| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES TULSA |
|
| 158 | 74 Final 70 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
605 | LOS ANGELES | -250 | 606 | TULSA | +200 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (330-205 since 1997.) (61.7%, +62 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (50-31 since 1997.) (61.7%, +27.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (43-18 since 1997.) (70.5%, +25.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (44-15 since 1997.) (74.6%, +21.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (43-27 since 1997.) (61.4%, +20.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (36-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +18.9 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss against a division rival, in August or September games. (276-103 since 1997.) (72.8%, +80.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (157-56 since 1997.) (73.7%, +57.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (117-36 since 1997.) (76.5%, +53.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record. (97-23 since 1997.) (80.8%, +49 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games. (84-19 since 1997.) (81.6%, +46.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after playing 2 consecutive home games, playing with 3 or more days rest. (97-84 since 1997.) (53.6%, +46.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record. (106-42 since 1997.) (71.6%, +41.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game, with a losing record. (78-54 since 1997.) (59.1%, +40.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after a win by 6 points or less. (80-29 since 1997.) (73.4%, +39.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games. (89-33 since 1997.) (73%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (79-33 since 1997.) (70.5%, +37.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (35-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.4%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a losing record. (51-12 since 1997.) (81%, +31.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record. (51-11 since 1997.) (82.3%, +29.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor offensive rebounding team - averaging <=9/game on the season. (33-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.8%, +20.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a bad team (25% to 40%) after 15 or more games. (42-9 since 1997.) (82.4%, +27.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good free throw shooting teams (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (45-11 since 1997.) (80.4%, +25 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good FT shooting teams (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (45-11 since 1997.) (80.4%, +25 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good FT shooting teams (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (45-11 since 1997.) (80.4%, +25 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (TULSA) - in a game involving two good free throw shooting teams (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (45-11 since 1997.) (80.4%, +25 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (TULSA) - in a game involving two good FT shooting teams (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (45-11 since 1997.) (80.4%, +25 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (TULSA) - in a game involving two good FT shooting teams (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (45-11 since 1997.) (80.4%, +25 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game against opponent after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games. (24-14 since 1997.) (63.2%, +24.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (83-21 since 1997.) (79.8%, +24.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after a win by 6 points or less. (40-19 since 1997.) (67.8%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after a win by 6 points or less. (28-4 since 1997.) (87.5%, +21.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (101-47 since 1997.) (68.2%, +21.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (36-18 since 1997.) (66.7%, +21 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (TULSA) - off a home win, with a losing record. (74-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.5%, +26.1 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES | 79 | | 32-66 | 47.6% | 3-9 | 34.9% | 13-16 | 79.3% | 43 | 10 | 14 | TULSA | 77 | | 27-67 | 40.8% | 7-20 | 33.8% | 16-20 | 76.5% | 42 | 12 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 546 times, while TULSA won 426 times. Edge against the money line=TULSA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in road games when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.9, OPPONENT 77.0 | LOS ANGELES is 11-2 against the money line (+9.0 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.1, OPPONENT 73.1 | LOS ANGELES is 188-52 against the money line (+113.2 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.0, OPPONENT 77.7 | LOS ANGELES is 210-121 against the money line (+39.4 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 73.0 | TULSA is 2-13 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was TULSA 76.7, OPPONENT 85.3 | TULSA is 3-14 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in home games when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was TULSA 78.4, OPPONENT 83.3 | TULSA is 3-9 against the money line (-7.8 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season. The average score was TULSA 75.6, OPPONENT 80.0 | TULSA is 2-12 against the money line (-9.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was TULSA 80.6, OPPONENT 89.4 | TULSA is 5-11 against the money line (-7.6 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was TULSA 77.5, OPPONENT 82.4 | TULSA is 2-8 against the money line (-9.3 Units) in home games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 75.7, OPPONENT 81.0 | TULSA is 2-13 against the money line (-11.9 Units) in home games when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was TULSA 74.1, OPPONENT 83.4 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 36-27 against the money line (-23.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.1, OPPONENT 80.2 | LOS ANGELES is 7-8 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in road games when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.2, OPPONENT 82.7 | LOS ANGELES is 9-12 against the money line (-25.0 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 78.9 | LOS ANGELES is 7-11 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in road games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.6, OPPONENT 85.3 | LOS ANGELES is 61-63 against the money line (-37.6 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 74.7 | LOS ANGELES is 8-10 against the money line (-11.9 Units) in road games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 79.9 | LOS ANGELES is 8-7 against the money line (-15.2 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.7, OPPONENT 83.6 | LOS ANGELES is 1-4 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in road games when they score 78 to 82 points in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.6, OPPONENT 86.6 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 20-12 against the money line (-22.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-12 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.7, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-4 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-13 against the money line (-25.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.7, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-11 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.8, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-5 against the money line (-19.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-7 against the money line (-16.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-6 against the money line (-18.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-9 against the money line (-23.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.7, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-6 against the money line (-20.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-15 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-7 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-13 against the money line (-13.8 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.3, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 43-30 against the money line (+19.4 Units) in road games when playing their 4th game in 7 days since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.8, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 29-22 against the money line (+15.2 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 45-33 against the money line (+15.8 Units) after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-2 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.2, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 3-9 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was TULSA 74.5, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 2-7 against the money line (-7.4 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more this season. The average score was TULSA 80.8, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 2-15 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 73.7, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 5*) | TULSA is 2-8 against the money line (-8.6 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 74.1, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 18-10 against the money line (-19.0 Units) in all games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-18 against the money line (-17.5 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-18 against the money line (-17.5 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-17 against the money line (-18.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.3, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-8 against the money line (-25.7 Units) vs. division opponents this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.5, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-10 against the money line (-12.2 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.6, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-13 against the money line (-26.8 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-10 against the money line (-22.8 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-9 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-22 against the money line (-19.8 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-7 against the money line (-18.0 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.0, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-8 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 21-10 | -19 | 12-19 | 11-20 | 81.9 | 40.5 | 47.8% | 41.3 | 75.5 | 37.3 | 41.5% | 41.8 | Road Games | 8-8 | -10 | 6-10 | 5-11 | 77.6 | 38.3 | 46.0% | 40.9 | 78.4 | 39.6 | 43.1% | 42.4 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.6 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 83.4 | 35.2 | 47.0% | 43.8 | 81.6 | 37.6 | 43.6% | 41.8 | Division Games | 11-8 | -25.6 | 8-11 | 6-13 | 81.5 | 39.4 | 46.0% | 42.1 | 75.6 | 38.1 | 42.2% | 42.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 81.9 | 40.5 | 32-66 | 47.8% | 3-10 | 33.7% | 15-19 | 78.0% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 76.2 | 37.7 | 28-66 | 42.8% | 5-14 | 32.5% | 15-19 | 78.3% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 77.6 | 38.3 | 31-67 | 46.0% | 3-9 | 30.6% | 13-17 | 75.5% | 41 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.5 | 37.3 | 28-68 | 41.5% | 4-14 | 30.1% | 15-19 | 77.5% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 75.6 | 37.4 | 28-66 | 42.2% | 5-15 | 32.6% | 15-19 | 78.3% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.4 | 39.6 | 29-67 | 43.1% | 4-13 | 31.6% | 16-21 | 78.8% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 10-20 | -6.2 | 16-13 | 16-14 | 77.0 | 37.1 | 40.4% | 41.1 | 79.8 | 38.7 | 45.3% | 43.9 | Home Games | 7-8 | -1.3 | 9-6 | 8-7 | 81.5 | 39.3 | 42.3% | 42.0 | 80.6 | 39.1 | 45.1% | 43.7 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.5 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 81.0 | 38.4 | 41.4% | 41.4 | 81.6 | 35.6 | 45.8% | 44.0 | Division Games | 6-12 | -2.6 | 11-6 | 10-8 | 77.9 | 36.6 | 42.6% | 39.4 | 79.1 | 37.6 | 45.7% | 41.9 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.0 | 37.1 | 27-66 | 40.4% | 7-19 | 34.0% | 17-22 | 77.4% | 41 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.9 | 37.6 | 28-67 | 42.2% | 5-15 | 32.3% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 81.5 | 39.3 | 29-68 | 42.3% | 7-19 | 36.6% | 17-22 | 76.3% | 42 | 12 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.8 | 38.7 | 30-67 | 45.3% | 5-14 | 32.9% | 15-19 | 77.7% | 44 | 10 | 17 | 20 | 9 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 76.8 | 38.1 | 29-66 | 43.4% | 4-14 | 32.2% | 15-19 | 78.5% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 80.6 | 39.1 | 30-67 | 45.1% | 5-15 | 35.4% | 14-19 | 77.8% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 69.9, TULSA 70.8 |
| | |
|
|
8/2/2013 | @ TULSA | 89-96 | L | -360 | 36-78 | 46.2% | 37 | 11 | 33-62 | 53.2% | 42 | 14 | 8/4/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 75-57 | W | -115 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 48 | 13 | 25-73 | 34.2% | 42 | 16 | 8/6/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 74-72 | W | -165 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 44 | 14 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 36 | 13 | 8/8/2013 | @ INDIANA | 74-64 | W | +120 | 30-55 | 54.5% | 37 | 16 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 42 | 10 | 8/10/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 85-67 | W | -220 | 35-67 | 52.2% | 42 | 15 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 41 | 12 | 8/13/2013 | CHICAGO | 80-76 | W | -270 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 40 | 17 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 41 | 11 | 8/16/2013 | INDIANA | 94-72 | W | -330 | 36-57 | 63.2% | 34 | 12 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 30 | 12 | 8/20/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 57-77 | L | -250 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 33 | 15 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 46 | 16 | 8/25/2013 | TULSA | 90-88 | W | -600 | 37-84 | 44.0% | 50 | 17 | 31-78 | 39.7% | 49 | 18 | 8/27/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 91-78 | W | | 37-65 | 56.9% | 42 | 13 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 38 | 18 | 8/31/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 80-67 | W | -400 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 46 | 10 | 26-74 | 35.1% | 44 | 13 | 9/2/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 82-92 | L | -155 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 41 | 15 | 34-65 | 52.3% | 34 | 12 | 9/4/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 74-83 | L | +250 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 40 | 13 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 44 | 9 | 9/6/2013 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/12/2013 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/15/2013 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8/2/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 96-89 | W | +280 | 33-62 | 53.2% | 42 | 14 | 36-78 | 46.2% | 37 | 11 | 8/4/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 65-69 | L | -120 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 51 | 19 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 41 | 14 | 8/9/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 67-70 | L | +135 | 24-59 | 40.7% | 31 | 16 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 50 | 20 | 8/11/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 56-77 | L | +250 | 14-51 | 27.5% | 38 | 15 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 45 | 8 | 8/16/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 83-77 | W | | 29-58 | 50.0% | 38 | 17 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 34 | 14 | 8/20/2013 | PHOENIX | 86-89 | L | +155 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 41 | 4 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 47 | 12 | 8/23/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 73-67 | W | -300 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 30 | 9 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 45 | 15 | 8/25/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 88-90 | L | +400 | 31-78 | 39.7% | 49 | 18 | 37-84 | 44.0% | 50 | 17 | 8/30/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 65-74 | L | -270 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 43 | 12 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 36 | 12 | 9/1/2013 | NEW YORK | 93-88 | W | -175 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 44 | 16 | 36-76 | 47.4% | 42 | 13 | 9/6/2013 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/8/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/12/2013 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/14/2013 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
TULSA is 17-22 (+5.5 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
TULSA is 4-6 (+8.5 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
TULSA is 13-10 (+7.8 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
TULSA is 3-3 (+5.5 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/25/2013 | TULSA | 88 | 157.5 | ATS | 30 | 31-78 | 39.7% | 10-23 | 43.5% | 16-17 | 94.1% | 49 | 14 | 18 | | LOS ANGELES | 90 | -10.5 | SU Over | 27 | 37-84 | 44.0% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 50 | 9 | 17 | 8/2/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 89 | -8 | Over | 31 | 36-78 | 46.2% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 37 | 11 | 11 | | TULSA | 96 | 162 | SU ATS | 42 | 33-62 | 53.2% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 23-28 | 82.1% | 42 | 6 | 14 | 7/11/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 94 | -8 | SU ATS | 50 | 39-71 | 54.9% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 35 | 8 | 10 | | TULSA | 78 | 163 | Over | 35 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 40 | 16 | 20 | 6/8/2013 | TULSA | 69 | 168 | ATS | 30 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 35 | 8 | 21 | | LOS ANGELES | 76 | -18 | SU Under | 38 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 45 | 11 | 20 | 8/30/2012 | LOS ANGELES | 85 | -9.5 | Over | 50 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 7-22 | 31.8% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 41 | 12 | 17 | | TULSA | 99 | 165 | SU ATS | 42 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 14-24 | 58.3% | 11-17 | 64.7% | 41 | 11 | 12 | 6/26/2012 | LOS ANGELES | 75 | -7 | Over | 25 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 39 | 6 | 23 | | TULSA | 91 | 163.5 | SU ATS | 48 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 9-14 | 64.3% | 43 | 8 | 16 | 6/20/2012 | TULSA | 79 | 159.5 | | 39 | 29-78 | 37.2% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 18-26 | 69.2% | 49 | 18 | 8 | | LOS ANGELES | 95 | -16 | SU Over | 49 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 1-10 | 10.0% | 26-34 | 76.5% | 44 | 13 | 14 | 5/29/2012 | TULSA | 75 | 154.5 | ATS | 36 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 20-28 | 71.4% | 39 | 11 | 15 | | LOS ANGELES | 76 | -15.5 | SU Under | 40 | 24-52 | 46.2% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 23-23 | 100.0% | 41 | 7 | 28 |
|
| | |
|
Gary is 5-13 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 77.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Gary is 2-15 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 73.7, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 5*) | Gary is 2-8 against the money line (-8.6 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 74.1, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Carol is 17-18 against the money line (-17.5 Units) in road games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 17-18 against the money line (-17.5 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 14-17 against the money line (-18.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.3, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 23-17 against the money line (-27.0 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 7-10 against the money line (-12.2 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.6, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 7-9 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 16-14 against the money line (-23.1 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 4-8 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 20-12 against the money line (-22.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 7-12 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.7, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 14-9 against the money line (-22.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 19-13 against the money line (-25.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.7, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 10-11 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.8, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 19-12 against the money line (-21.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 13-15 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 4-7 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 8-13 against the money line (-13.8 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.3, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 30 times, while the home underdog won straight up 22 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog won the game straight up 6 times, while the road favorite won the game straight up 5 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/4/2024 9:14:31 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|