| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES
First Half Results
TULSA |
|
|
78
| 37
Final
39 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 605 | LOS ANGELES | -3 | | 606 | TULSA | 78.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(86-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.7%, +34.3 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(63-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.3%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(45-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +21.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(28-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.7%, +18.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - vs. division opponents.
(856-642 since 1997.) (57.1%, +149.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(526-390 since 1997.) (57.4%, +97 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after one or more consecutive overs.
(658-499 since 1997.) (56.9%, +109.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(128-75 since 1997.) (63.1%, +45.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record.
(160-98 since 1997.) (62%, +52.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(110-66 since 1997.) (62.5%, +37.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(91-48 since 1997.) (65.5%, +38.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - with a losing record.
(481-353 since 1997.) (57.7%, +92.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(76-41 since 1997.) (65%, +30.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(715-492 since 1997.) (59.2%, +173.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(180-110 since 1997.) (62.1%, +59 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(312-209 since 1997.) (59.9%, +82.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(95-51 since 1997.) (65.1%, +38.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(62-31 since 1997.) (66.7%, +27.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a home win.
(195-123 since 1997.) (61.3%, +59.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points.
(523-376 since 1997.) (58.2%, +109.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record.
(240-162 since 1997.) (59.7%, +61.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(508-343 since 1997.) (59.7%, +130.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(252-165 since 1997.) (60.4%, +70.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(114-64 since 1997.) (64%, +43.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(90-48 since 1997.) (65.2%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(61-31 since 1997.) (66.3%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent.
(565-380 since 1997.) (59.8%, +147 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(145-82 since 1997.) (63.9%, +54.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(251-167 since 1997.) (60%, +67.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - off a home win, in August or September games.
(158-101 since 1997.) (61%, +46.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season.
(138-79 since 1997.) (63.6%, +51.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(686-514 since 1997.) (57.2%, +120.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents.
(856-642 since 1997.) (57.1%, +149.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning record on the season.
(199-131 since 1997.) (60.3%, +54.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days, with a winning record on the season.
(123-71 since 1997.) (63.4%, +44.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(112-66 since 1997.) (62.9%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(95-52 since 1997.) (64.6%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(48-22 since 1997.) (68.6%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(95-52 since 1997.) (64.6%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(95-52 since 1997.) (64.6%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(48-22 since 1997.) (68.6%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(48-22 since 1997.) (68.6%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(405-262 since 1997.) (60.7%, +116.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(297-186 since 1997.) (61.5%, +92.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(55-25 since 1997.) (68.8%, +27.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(112-66 since 1997.) (62.9%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(95-52 since 1997.) (64.6%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(48-22 since 1997.) (68.6%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(95-52 since 1997.) (64.6%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(95-52 since 1997.) (64.6%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(48-22 since 1997.) (68.6%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(48-22 since 1997.) (68.6%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(110-64 since 1997.) (63.2%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(92-52 since 1997.) (63.9%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(92-52 since 1997.) (63.9%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(92-52 since 1997.) (63.9%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(405-262 since 1997.) (60.7%, +116.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(297-186 since 1997.) (61.5%, +92.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(233-156 since 1997.) (59.9%, +61.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - with a winning record on the season.
(650-451 since 1997.) (59%, +153.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(439-309 since 1997.) (58.7%, +99.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(266-177 since 1997.) (60%, +71.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(146-87 since 1997.) (62.7%, +50.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season.
(343-245 since 1997.) (58.3%, +73.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(418-297 since 1997.) (58.5%, +91.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after a win by 6 points or less.
(84-44 since 1997.) (65.6%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game.
(192-119 since 1997.) (61.7%, +61.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after a win by 6 points or less.
(34-11 since 1997.) (75.6%, +21.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after playing 3 consecutive road games.
(114-66 since 1997.) (63.3%, +41.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| LOS ANGELES | 79 | | 40 | | 32-66 | 47.6% | 3-9 | 34.9% | 13-16 | 79.3% | 43 | 10 | 14 | | TULSA | 77 | | 39 | | 27-67 | 40.8% | 7-20 | 33.8% | 16-20 | 76.5% | 42 | 12 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, TULSA covered the first half line 546 times, while LOS ANGELES covered the first half line 410 times.
Edge against first half line=TULSA | In 1000 simulated games, 512 games went over first half total, while 488 games went under first half total.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 28-16 against the 1rst half line (+10.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.4, OPPONENT 38.1 | LOS ANGELES is 12-4 against the 1rst half line (+7.6 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.7, OPPONENT 37.0 | LOS ANGELES is 33-13 against the 1rst half line (+18.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 44.1, OPPONENT 37.8 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 41-22 OVER (+16.8 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.2, OPPONENT 40.2 | LOS ANGELES is 11-1 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.5, OPPONENT 43.8 | LOS ANGELES is 29-18 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 44.1, OPPONENT 37.8 | TULSA is 27-14 OVER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 39.1, OPPONENT 44.4 | TULSA is 26-12 OVER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 40.5, OPPONENT 43.6 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 174-134 UNDER (+26.6 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 34.6 | LOS ANGELES is 69-41 UNDER (+23.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.2, OPPONENT 34.8 | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.1, OPPONENT 35.6 | LOS ANGELES is 185-143 UNDER (+27.7 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 34.8 |
|
| | | | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 23-13 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.5, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-5 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.2, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 22-10 against the 1rst half line (+11.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.7, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 33-20 against the 1rst half line (+11.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.6, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 34-21 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.6, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-8 against the 1rst half line (+9.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.1, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 32.3, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
TULSA is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 40.5, OPPONENT 45.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 74-48 UNDER (+21.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.2, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 42-25 UNDER (+14.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.8, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 31-7 UNDER (+23.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 33.6, OPPONENT 31.1 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 22-5 UNDER (+16.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 32.1, OPPONENT 30.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 32-17 UNDER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.0, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-5 UNDER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.1, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 101-69 UNDER (+25.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 179-141 UNDER (+23.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.6, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 130-90 UNDER (+31.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.6, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.8, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 33.8, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 108-65 UNDER (+36.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.4, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 145-105 UNDER (+29.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 40-28 against the 1rst half line (+9.2 Units) versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.1, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 35-18 against the 1rst half line (+15.2 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.2, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-8 against the 1rst half line (+10.2 Units) in August or September games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.1, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.0, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-2 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.2, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.9, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-0 against the 1rst half line (+10.0 Units) off 2 or more consecutive road losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 46.9, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 33-20 against the 1rst half line (+11.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.7, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 29-18 against the 1rst half line (+9.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.5, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 14-28 against the 1rst half line (-16.8 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 36.7, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 26-43 against the 1rst half line (-21.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 36.0, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 19-32 against the 1rst half line (-16.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 36.6, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 9-22 against the 1rst half line (-15.2 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.1, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 18-33 against the 1rst half line (-18.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.5, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 9-20 against the 1rst half line (-13.0 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.5, OPPONENT 43.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
TULSA is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) as a home underdog of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 44.3, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 17-8 against the 1rst half line (+8.2 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.8, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 20-6 OVER (+13.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.8, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 OVER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total off 2 or more consecutive road losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 46.9, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-3 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.8, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-0 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.6, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 326-271 UNDER (+27.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.5, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 172-128 UNDER (+31.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.0, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 143-103 UNDER (+29.7 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.6, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-6 UNDER (+6.4 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.4, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 209-165 UNDER (+27.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.4, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 127-91 UNDER (+26.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.7, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 81-57 UNDER (+18.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 4th game in 7 days since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.7, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 30-16 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 3rd road game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.2, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 151-113 UNDER (+26.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.4, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 102-65 UNDER (+30.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.5, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-7 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.1, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 80-56 UNDER (+18.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.3, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 65-41 UNDER (+19.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.3, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 162-117 UNDER (+33.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 168-127 UNDER (+28.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 85-60 UNDER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 8-2 UNDER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total on Friday this season.
The average score was TULSA 35.0, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 23-11 UNDER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 36.0, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season.
The average score was TULSA 35.3, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 21-10 | -19 | 12-19 | 11-20 | 81.9 | 40.5 | 47.8% | 41.3 | 75.5 | 37.3 | 41.5% | 41.8 | | Road Games | 8-8 | -10 | 6-10 | 5-11 | 77.6 | 38.3 | 46.0% | 40.9 | 78.4 | 39.6 | 43.1% | 42.4 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.6 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 83.4 | 35.2 | 47.0% | 43.8 | 81.6 | 37.6 | 43.6% | 41.8 | | Division Games | 11-8 | -25.6 | 8-11 | 6-13 | 81.5 | 39.4 | 46.0% | 42.1 | 75.6 | 38.1 | 42.2% | 42.1 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 81.9 | 40.5 | 32-66 | 47.8% | 3-10 | 33.7% | 15-19 | 78.0% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 76.2 | 37.7 | 28-66 | 42.8% | 5-14 | 32.5% | 15-19 | 78.3% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 77.6 | 38.3 | 31-67 | 46.0% | 3-9 | 30.6% | 13-17 | 75.5% | 41 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.5 | 37.3 | 28-68 | 41.5% | 4-14 | 30.1% | 15-19 | 77.5% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.6 | 37.4 | 28-66 | 42.2% | 5-15 | 32.6% | 15-19 | 78.3% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.4 | 39.6 | 29-67 | 43.1% | 4-13 | 31.6% | 16-21 | 78.8% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 10-20 | -6.2 | 16-13 | 16-14 | 77.0 | 37.1 | 40.4% | 41.1 | 79.8 | 38.7 | 45.3% | 43.9 | | Home Games | 7-8 | -1.3 | 9-6 | 8-7 | 81.5 | 39.3 | 42.3% | 42.0 | 80.6 | 39.1 | 45.1% | 43.7 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.5 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 81.0 | 38.4 | 41.4% | 41.4 | 81.6 | 35.6 | 45.8% | 44.0 | | Division Games | 6-12 | -2.6 | 11-6 | 10-8 | 77.9 | 36.6 | 42.6% | 39.4 | 79.1 | 37.6 | 45.7% | 41.9 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 77.0 | 37.1 | 27-66 | 40.4% | 7-19 | 34.0% | 17-22 | 77.4% | 41 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75.9 | 37.6 | 28-67 | 42.2% | 5-15 | 32.3% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 81.5 | 39.3 | 29-68 | 42.3% | 7-19 | 36.6% | 17-22 | 76.3% | 42 | 12 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.8 | 38.7 | 30-67 | 45.3% | 5-14 | 32.9% | 15-19 | 77.7% | 44 | 10 | 17 | 20 | 9 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 76.8 | 38.1 | 29-66 | 43.4% | 4-14 | 32.2% | 15-19 | 78.5% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 80.6 | 39.1 | 30-67 | 45.1% | 5-15 | 35.4% | 14-19 | 77.8% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 69.9, TULSA 70.8 |
| | |
|
|
| 8/2/2013 | @ TULSA | 89-96 | 31-42 | -4.5 | L | 80 | U | 36-78 | 46.2% | 37 | 11 | 33-62 | 53.2% | 42 | 14 | | 8/4/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 75-57 | 33-26 | -0.5 | W | 77.5 | U | 33-70 | 47.1% | 48 | 13 | 25-73 | 34.2% | 42 | 16 | | 8/6/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 74-72 | 43-36 | -2 | W | 76 | O | 30-68 | 44.1% | 44 | 14 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 36 | 13 | | 8/8/2013 | @ INDIANA | 74-64 | 43-30 | 1.5 | W | 72.5 | O | 30-55 | 54.5% | 37 | 16 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 42 | 10 | | 8/10/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 85-67 | 39-30 | -3 | W | 75 | U | 35-67 | 52.2% | 42 | 15 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 41 | 12 | | 8/13/2013 | CHICAGO | 80-76 | 34-34 | -3.5 | L | 79 | U | 32-61 | 52.5% | 40 | 17 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 41 | 11 | | 8/16/2013 | INDIANA | 94-72 | 49-37 | -4 | W | 71.5 | O | 36-57 | 63.2% | 34 | 12 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 30 | 12 | | 8/20/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 57-77 | 37-51 | -3 | L | 72.5 | O | 23-61 | 37.7% | 33 | 15 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 46 | 16 | | 8/25/2013 | TULSA | 90-88 | 27-30 | -6 | L | 78 | U | 37-84 | 44.0% | 50 | 17 | 31-78 | 39.7% | 49 | 18 | | 8/27/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 91-78 | 49-35 | -8 | W | 75.5 | O | 37-65 | 56.9% | 42 | 13 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 38 | 18 | | 8/31/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 80-67 | 35-30 | -5 | T | 75.5 | U | 33-69 | 47.8% | 46 | 10 | 26-74 | 35.1% | 44 | 13 | | 9/2/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 82-92 | 32-48 | -1.5 | L | 76.5 | O | 28-62 | 45.2% | 41 | 15 | 34-65 | 52.3% | 34 | 12 | | 9/4/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 74-83 | 33-45 | 4 | L | 79 | U | 30-71 | 42.3% | 40 | 13 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 44 | 9 | | 9/6/2013 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/12/2013 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/15/2013 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 8/2/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 96-89 | 42-31 | 4.5 | W | 80 | U | 33-62 | 53.2% | 42 | 14 | 36-78 | 46.2% | 37 | 11 | | 8/4/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 65-69 | 35-33 | -1 | W | 74.5 | U | 23-60 | 38.3% | 51 | 19 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 41 | 14 | | 8/9/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 67-70 | 38-40 | 1.5 | L | 79 | U | 24-59 | 40.7% | 31 | 16 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 50 | 20 | | 8/11/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 56-77 | 16-40 | 4 | L | 76.5 | U | 14-51 | 27.5% | 38 | 15 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 45 | 8 | | 8/16/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 83-77 | 44-42 | 8.5 | W | 75.5 | O | 29-58 | 50.0% | 38 | 17 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 34 | 14 | | 8/20/2013 | PHOENIX | 86-89 | 42-39 | 2 | W | 75.5 | O | 33-74 | 44.6% | 41 | 4 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 47 | 12 | | 8/23/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 73-67 | 40-22 | -3.5 | W | 73.5 | U | 28-63 | 44.4% | 30 | 9 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 45 | 15 | | 8/25/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 88-90 | 30-27 | 6 | W | 78 | U | 31-78 | 39.7% | 49 | 18 | 37-84 | 44.0% | 50 | 17 | | 8/30/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 65-74 | 28-42 | -3.5 | L | 72.5 | U | 25-68 | 36.8% | 43 | 12 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 36 | 12 | | 9/1/2013 | NEW YORK | 93-88 | 52-48 | -2 | W | 72.5 | O | 26-62 | 41.9% | 44 | 16 | 36-76 | 47.4% | 42 | 13 | | 9/6/2013 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/8/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/12/2013 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/14/2013 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| TULSA is 26-16 versus the first half line when playing against LOS ANGELES since 1997 | | 22 of 41 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| TULSA is 9-4 versus the first half line when playing against LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons | | 7 of 12 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| TULSA is 15-7 versus the first half line when playing against LOS ANGELES since 1997 | | 13 of 23 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| TULSA is 4-2 versus the first half line when playing against LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons | | 4 of 6 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/25/2013 | TULSA | 88 | 157.5 | ATS | 30 | 31-78 | 39.7% | 10-23 | 43.5% | 16-17 | 94.1% | 49 | 14 | 18 | | | LOS ANGELES | 90 | -10.5 | SU Over | 27 | 37-84 | 44.0% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 50 | 9 | 17 | 8/2/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 89 | -8 | Over | 31 | 36-78 | 46.2% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 37 | 11 | 11 | | | TULSA | 96 | 162 | SU ATS | 42 | 33-62 | 53.2% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 23-28 | 82.1% | 42 | 6 | 14 | 7/11/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 94 | -8 | SU ATS | 50 | 39-71 | 54.9% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 35 | 8 | 10 | | | TULSA | 78 | 163 | Over | 35 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 40 | 16 | 20 | 6/8/2013 | TULSA | 69 | 168 | ATS | 30 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 35 | 8 | 21 | | | LOS ANGELES | 76 | -18 | SU Under | 38 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 45 | 11 | 20 | 8/30/2012 | LOS ANGELES | 85 | -9.5 | Over | 50 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 7-22 | 31.8% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 41 | 12 | 17 | | | TULSA | 99 | 165 | SU ATS | 42 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 14-24 | 58.3% | 11-17 | 64.7% | 41 | 11 | 12 | 6/26/2012 | LOS ANGELES | 75 | -7 | Over | 25 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 39 | 6 | 23 | | | TULSA | 91 | 163.5 | SU ATS | 48 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 9-14 | 64.3% | 43 | 8 | 16 | 6/20/2012 | TULSA | 79 | 159.5 | | 39 | 29-78 | 37.2% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 18-26 | 69.2% | 49 | 18 | 8 | | | LOS ANGELES | 95 | -16 | SU Over | 49 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 1-10 | 10.0% | 26-34 | 76.5% | 44 | 13 | 14 | 5/29/2012 | TULSA | 75 | 154.5 | ATS | 36 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 20-28 | 71.4% | 39 | 11 | 15 | | | LOS ANGELES | 76 | -15.5 | SU Under | 40 | 24-52 | 46.2% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 23-23 | 100.0% | 41 | 7 | 28 |
|
| | |
|
Carol is 40-28 against the 1rst half line (+9.2 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.1, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 35-18 against the 1rst half line (+15.2 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.2, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 19-8 against the 1rst half line (+10.2 Units) in August or September games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.1, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.0, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 11-2 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.2, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.9, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 33-20 against the 1rst half line (+11.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.7, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 29-18 against the 1rst half line (+9.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.5, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 23-13 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.5, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 14-5 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.2, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 22-10 against the 1rst half line (+11.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.7, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 33-20 against the 1rst half line (+11.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.6, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 34-21 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.6, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 18-8 against the 1rst half line (+9.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.1, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Gary is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) as a home underdog of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 44.3, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Gary is 17-8 against the 1rst half line (+8.2 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.8, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Gary is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 40.5, OPPONENT 45.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Carol is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home underdog covered the first half line 31 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 20 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog covered the first half line 6 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 5 times. |
|
|
| |
|
Since 1997, 13 games went over the first half total, while 3 games went under the first half total.
Edge against the first half total=Over | Over the last 3 seasons, 8 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total.
Edge against the first half total=Over |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite covered the first half line 2 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 1 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite covered the first half line 2 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 0 times. | | Since 1997, 3 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 2 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/26/2024 3:39:15 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|