| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
INDIANA CHICAGO |
|
| 145.5 | 82 Final 77 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
607 | INDIANA | +220 | 608 | CHICAGO | -300 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent. (693-300 since 1997.) (69.8%, +135.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent. (648-284 since 1997.) (69.5%, +126.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (317-119 since 1997.) (72.7%, +81.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (280-102 since 1997.) (73.3%, +74.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (268-99 since 1997.) (73%, +71.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (286-110 since 1997.) (72.2%, +66.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game. (117-20 since 1997.) (85.4%, +62.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (330-205 since 1997.) (61.7%, +62 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, with a winning record on the season. (202-68 since 1997.) (74.8%, +55.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season, in August or September games. (88-17 since 1997.) (83.8%, +48.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite. (109-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.8%, +32.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 3 or more consecutive unders, very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game. (44-4 since 1997.) (91.7%, +35.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (37-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +27 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 4 or more consecutive unders, very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game. (33-2 since 1997.) (94.3%, +29.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after going over the total by more than 24 points in their previous game, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team. (31-9 since 1997.) (77.5%, +22 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games against opponent after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games. (27-5 since 1997.) (84.4%, +20.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - average defensive team (65-72 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (32-13 since 1997.) (71.1%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off 3 consecutive wins against division rivals against opponent after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points. (24-7 since 1997.) (77.4%, +19 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (29-11 since 1997.) (72.5%, +16.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - average defensive team (65-72 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (21-7 since 1997.) (75%, +15.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going over the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games. (44-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +26.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team. (70-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.1%, +38.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a win against a division rival, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record. (53-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.9%, +23.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games. (37-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +24.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going over the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games. (31-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.1%, +22 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA | 69 | | 25-66 | 37.4% | 6-17 | 35.2% | 13-17 | 77.8% | 41 | 10 | 13 | CHICAGO | 76 | | 27-64 | 42.0% | 4-13 | 32.0% | 18-22 | 81.3% | 47 | 11 | 14 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 683 times, while INDIANA won 290 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
INDIANA is 15-7 against the money line (+8.8 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.1, OPPONENT 71.7 | INDIANA is 23-14 against the money line (+9.2 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.1, OPPONENT 73.1 | CHICAGO is 18-30 against the money line (-20.1 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 77.6 |
|
INDIANA is 5-9 against the money line (-9.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was INDIANA 71.0, OPPONENT 73.8 | INDIANA is 4-12 against the money line (-13.9 Units) when they make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 69.8, OPPONENT 73.9 | INDIANA is 38-68 against the money line (-40.8 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 69.1, OPPONENT 71.4 | INDIANA is 8-13 against the money line (-9.0 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season. The average score was INDIANA 69.8, OPPONENT 70.9 | INDIANA is 5-11 against the money line (-11.4 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 71.1, OPPONENT 74.5 | INDIANA is 8-13 against the money line (-11.5 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.3, OPPONENT 76.0 | INDIANA is 6-13 against the money line (-11.3 Units) when they score 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 68.6, OPPONENT 72.1 | CHICAGO is 7-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.9, OPPONENT 71.6 | CHICAGO is 9-3 against the money line (+5.8 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 69.1 | CHICAGO is 8-1 against the money line (+8.1 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 69.2 |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 25-16 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.8, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 34-24 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.6, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 19-13 against the money line (+10.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.9, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 27-20 against the money line (+10.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.4, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 27-17 against the money line (+12.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.4, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 55-35 against the money line (+18.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.8, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 13-7 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.4, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 77-61 against the money line (+17.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.0, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 53-91 against the money line (-43.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-13 against the money line (-16.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 31-60 against the money line (-30.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.2, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-15 against the money line (-14.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 34-41 against the money line (-20.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-17 against the money line (-16.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-8.2 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 69.1, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-10 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 19-9 against the money line (+12.1 Units) after a game with 16 or more offensive rebounds since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.3, OPPONENT 67.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 8-3 against the money line (+6.8 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season. The average score was INDIANA 69.8, OPPONENT 64.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 79-57 against the money line (+22.4 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.5, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 85-61 against the money line (+21.9 Units) off a road loss since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.2, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 19-9 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.6, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 17-8 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.8, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 17-4 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 81.5, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 124-106 against the money line (+21.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.3, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 64-68 against the money line (-31.8 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-13 against the money line (-14.8 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 30-35 against the money line (-21.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 70.7, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 0-4 against the money line (-9.2 Units) in home games revenging a loss where team scored less than 60 points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 65.8, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-16 against the money line (-16.9 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 9-14 against the money line (-15.3 Units) in home games off a home win since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 0-4 against the money line (-9.6 Units) after 3 straight wins by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 69.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 38-61 against the money line (-36.4 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.5, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 26-50 against the money line (-33.7 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.3, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 12-16 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-16 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 65.8, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 3-10 against the money line (-8.3 Units) in road games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 26-61 against the money line (-33.6 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 70.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 2-8 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 70.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 1-6 against the money line (-7.2 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 68.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 15-4 against the money line (+9.3 Units) vs. division opponents this season. The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 17-8 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-1 against the money line (+7.9 Units) off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 11-2 against the money line (+8.9 Units) off a win against a division rival this season. The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 8-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.4, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 13-16 | -6.5 | 14-15 | 10-18 | 70.5 | 35.8 | 39.4% | 39.2 | 70.5 | 34.2 | 44.1% | 40.5 | Road Games | 6-9 | -1.9 | 7-8 | 5-10 | 69.0 | 34.1 | 39.9% | 39.1 | 70.5 | 34.1 | 43.3% | 40.6 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1 | 3-2 | 5-0 | 76.0 | 37.2 | 41.2% | 38.0 | 76.0 | 35.0 | 44.6% | 41.6 | Division Games | 8-9 | -3.8 | 8-9 | 5-11 | 70.2 | 36.4 | 38.5% | 40.5 | 68.9 | 32.3 | 42.3% | 42.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.5 | 35.8 | 25-64 | 39.4% | 6-16 | 35.1% | 14-18 | 77.9% | 39 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 10 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 76.3 | 37.8 | 28-67 | 42.2% | 5-14 | 32.5% | 15-19 | 78.0% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 69.0 | 34.1 | 25-64 | 39.9% | 5-16 | 32.8% | 13-17 | 76.3% | 39 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 10 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.5 | 34.2 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 4-12 | 31.8% | 15-18 | 79.6% | 40 | 8 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 76 | 37.6 | 28-67 | 42.5% | 4-14 | 31.7% | 15-19 | 77.9% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 70.5 | 34.1 | 25-58 | 43.3% | 4-11 | 32.7% | 16-20 | 79.5% | 41 | 8 | 14 | 16 | 7 | 15 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 21-8 | +6.7 | 19-10 | 13-16 | 79.6 | 39.9 | 41.9% | 46.8 | 72.8 | 37.1 | 40.2% | 41.9 | Home Games | 12-2 | +5 | 9-5 | 8-6 | 82.4 | 39.9 | 42.5% | 47.5 | 73.8 | 38.4 | 41.2% | 40.5 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +5.6 | 5-0 | 1-4 | 80.4 | 35.4 | 41.4% | 47.8 | 67.8 | 36.4 | 39.4% | 42.2 | Division Games | 15-4 | +9.3 | 13-6 | 8-11 | 78.7 | 40.0 | 41.7% | 46.3 | 70.7 | 36.7 | 39.2% | 43.3 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 79.6 | 39.9 | 29-68 | 41.9% | 5-14 | 32.9% | 18-22 | 81.4% | 47 | 11 | 15 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 76.1 | 37.5 | 28-66 | 42.6% | 5-14 | 32.4% | 15-19 | 78.2% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 82.4 | 39.9 | 30-69 | 42.5% | 4-14 | 30.3% | 19-23 | 82.4% | 47 | 11 | 17 | 16 | 7 | 12 | 7 | Stats Against (All Games) | 72.8 | 37.1 | 27-68 | 40.2% | 4-13 | 32.9% | 14-18 | 76.7% | 42 | 9 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 74.2 | 36.5 | 28-67 | 41.7% | 4-14 | 32.1% | 14-18 | 77.3% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 73.8 | 38.4 | 29-69 | 41.2% | 4-13 | 34.2% | 12-15 | 78.7% | 40 | 8 | 16 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: INDIANA 69.8, CHICAGO 70.5 |
| | |
|
|
8/1/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 64-70 | L | +170 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 48 | 13 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 36 | 8 | 8/3/2013 | CHICAGO | 79-58 | W | -155 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 50 | 10 | 20-61 | 32.8% | 39 | 14 | 8/6/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 64-58 | W | +200 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 35 | 9 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 52 | 15 | 8/8/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 64-74 | L | -140 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 42 | 10 | 30-55 | 54.5% | 37 | 16 | 8/10/2013 | ATLANTA | 80-66 | W | -140 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 38 | 13 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 29 | 14 | 8/14/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 58-75 | L | +175 | 21-67 | 31.3% | 34 | 12 | 28-56 | 50.0% | 45 | 19 | 8/16/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 72-94 | L | +250 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 30 | 12 | 36-57 | 63.2% | 34 | 12 | 8/17/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 70-77 | L | +100 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 43 | 5 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 28 | 11 | 8/21/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 80-63 | W | -360 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 35 | 12 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 38 | 19 | 8/24/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 77-84 | L | +350 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 31 | 13 | 37-64 | 57.8% | 35 | 13 | 8/30/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 73-67 | W | -200 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 37 | 7 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 48 | 13 | 9/4/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 80-89 | L | +170 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 44 | 15 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 59 | 16 | 9/6/2013 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/7/2013 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/10/2013 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2013 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/15/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8/2/2013 | WASHINGTON | 85-78 | W | -270 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 41 | 10 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 41 | 19 | 8/3/2013 | @ INDIANA | 58-79 | L | +135 | 20-61 | 32.8% | 39 | 14 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 50 | 10 | 8/6/2013 | INDIANA | 58-64 | L | -250 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 52 | 15 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 35 | 9 | 8/9/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 77-61 | W | -200 | 32-73 | 43.8% | 53 | 12 | 25-78 | 32.1% | 47 | 9 | 8/11/2013 | MINNESOTA | 94-86 | W | +105 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 39 | 14 | 32-74 | 43.2% | 41 | 16 | 8/13/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 76-80 | L | +210 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 41 | 11 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 40 | 17 | 8/15/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 79-66 | W | -125 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 41 | 10 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 27 | 16 | 8/18/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 89-78 | W | -400 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 46 | 16 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 34 | 18 | 8/20/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 79-73 | W | -140 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 49 | 11 | 22-64 | 34.4% | 51 | 14 | 8/23/2013 | NEW YORK | 82-64 | W | -750 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 45 | 10 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 39 | 19 | 8/24/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 67-56 | W | +155 | 23-64 | 35.9% | 53 | 20 | 20-70 | 28.6% | 47 | 22 | 8/31/2013 | ATLANTA | 85-68 | W | -300 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 46 | 8 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 40 | 17 | 9/6/2013 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/8/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2013 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/14/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
INDIANA is 26-6 (+12.5 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
INDIANA is 10-2 (+8.8 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
INDIANA is 11-4 (+8.0 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
INDIANA is 4-1 (+3.8 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/6/2013 | INDIANA | 64 | 146.5 | SU ATS | 29 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 16-17 | 94.1% | 35 | 10 | 9 | | CHICAGO | 58 | -6 | Under | 29 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 12-20 | 60.0% | 52 | 15 | 15 | 8/3/2013 | CHICAGO | 58 | 144 | Under | 32 | 20-61 | 32.8% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 39 | 11 | 14 | | INDIANA | 79 | -3 | SU ATS | 40 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 21-28 | 75.0% | 50 | 15 | 10 | 6/22/2013 | CHICAGO | 71 | -6 | SU ATS | 35 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 48 | 10 | 14 | | INDIANA | 61 | 145 | Under | 37 | 20-63 | 31.7% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 35 | 6 | 9 | 9/1/2012 | CHICAGO | 64 | 149 | Under | 31 | 23-56 | 41.1% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 39 | 11 | 20 | | INDIANA | 81 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 45 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 5-13 | 38.5% | 18-19 | 94.7% | 33 | 8 | 9 | 7/7/2012 | CHICAGO | 86 | 145.5 | ATS | 33 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 14-22 | 63.6% | 51 | 12 | 24 | | INDIANA | 88 | -9.5 | SU Over | 37 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 8-22 | 36.4% | 28-38 | 73.7% | 40 | 10 | 15 | 6/27/2012 | INDIANA | 81 | -1 | SU ATS | 37 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 11-19 | 57.9% | 14-20 | 70.0% | 35 | 7 | 10 | | CHICAGO | 72 | 145 | Over | 33 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 16-25 | 64.0% | 46 | 9 | 15 | 6/16/2012 | CHICAGO | 70 | 149.5 | Over | 38 | 28-55 | 50.9% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 9-17 | 52.9% | 37 | 6 | 21 | | INDIANA | 84 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 42 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 33 | 7 | 11 | 5/25/2012 | INDIANA | 83 | 149 | SU ATS | 37 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 20-26 | 76.9% | 37 | 4 | 15 | | CHICAGO | 72 | -2.5 | Over | 35 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 3-20 | 15.0% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 46 | 14 | 22 |
|
| | |
|
Lin is 91-57 against the money line (+16.4 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.6, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 78-51 against the money line (+16.7 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.6, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 20-11 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 10-3 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 73.4, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 13-7 against the money line (+10.4 Units) in road games off a road loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lin 71.9, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 40-20 against the money line (+13.2 Units) off a road loss as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.5, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 50-24 against the money line (+28.3 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Lin is 47-22 against the money line (+26.0 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Lin is 67-41 against the money line (+14.0 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.3, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 33-12 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 79.4, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 56-36 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.6, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 109-78 against the money line (+11.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 74-52 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 105-74 against the money line (+12.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.2, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 25-16 against the money line (+10.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 79.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 34-22 against the money line (+13.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.0, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 27-17 against the money line (+11.9 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.3, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 19-19 against the money line (-15.6 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 30-35 against the money line (-21.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 18-27 against the money line (-19.4 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 10-20 against the money line (-11.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 72.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 20-29 against the money line (-14.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 13-26 against the money line (-26.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 73.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Pokey is 16-28 against the money line (-23.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.5, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 34-41 against the money line (-20.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 15-29 against the money line (-25.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 36-40 against the money line (-17.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 2-8 against the money line (-8.2 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 69.1, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 5-10 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Lin is 20-39 against the money line (-23.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lin 69.5, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 30-49 against the money line (-26.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lin 70.1, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 15-3 against the money line (+11.4 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 96 times, while the road underdog won straight up 46 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 13 times, while the road underdog won straight up 8 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 09/05/2013 - Erin Phillips "?" Friday vs. Chicago Sky ( Eye ) | [G] 09/04/2013 - Briann January "?" Friday vs. Chicago Sky ( Flu ) | [G] 06/21/2013 - Katie Douglas out indefinitely ( Back ) | [C] 06/21/2013 - Jessica Davenport out for season ( Tibia ) | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 3/28/2024 10:07:21 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|