| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA NEW YORK |
|
| 150 | 70 Final 57 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
603 | ATLANTA | -155 | 604 | NEW YORK | +135 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (85-51 since 1997.) (62.5%, +37.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game). (85-51 since 1997.) (62.5%, +37.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (85-51 since 1997.) (62.5%, +37.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent. (693-300 since 1997.) (69.8%, +135.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (317-119 since 1997.) (72.7%, +81.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more. (214-83 since 1997.) (72.1%, +71.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (187-55 since 1997.) (77.3%, +67.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (161-54 since 1997.) (74.9%, +58.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (157-56 since 1997.) (73.7%, +57.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (162-95 since 1997.) (63%, +57.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, with a winning record on the season. (202-68 since 1997.) (74.8%, +55.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (54-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (74%, +43.1 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (117-36 since 1997.) (76.5%, +53.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO's). (45-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.8%, +26.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (123-39 since 1997.) (75.9%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after 2 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 2 or more consecutive wins. (117-44 since 1997.) (72.7%, +48.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more. (136-50 since 1997.) (73.1%, +48.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (126-51 since 1997.) (71.2%, +47.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average free throw shooting teams (71-76%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO's). (114-32 since 1997.) (78.1%, +46.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite. (109-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.8%, +32.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (91-29 since 1997.) (75.8%, +43.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) - 15+ games. (35-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.4%, +20.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO's). (35-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.4%, +20.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) - 15+ games. (35-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.4%, +20.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after scoring 80 points or more. (88-31 since 1997.) (73.9%, +41.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent as a home favorite of 7 or more. (38-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.4%, +19.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game, with a losing record. (78-54 since 1997.) (59.1%, +40.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a straight up loss vs opponent as a favorite of 7 or more. (43-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +16.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (87-23 since 1997.) (79.1%, +38.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (121-85 since 1997.) (58.7%, +38.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, on Friday nights. (38-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (82-45 since 1997.) (64.6%, +33.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games against opponent after a game where they covered the spread. (55-16 since 1997.) (77.5%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, on Friday nights. (52-14 since 1997.) (78.8%, +30.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, on Friday nights. (25-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.3%, +24.7 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points. (61-37 since 1997.) (62.2%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (84-52 since 1997.) (61.8%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game against opponent after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games. (28-16 since 1997.) (63.6%, +28.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, on Friday nights. (56-29 since 1997.) (65.9%, +28.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after allowing 90 points or more. (36-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.5%, +22.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - vs. division opponents, off an home win scoring 85 or more points. (45-24 since 1997.) (65.2%, +25.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season. (43-21 since 1997.) (67.2%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (40-22 since 1997.) (64.5%, +25 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games. (27-13 since 1997.) (67.5%, +23.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, playing with 3 or more days rest. (69-21 since 1997.) (76.7%, +23.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent as a home favorite of 7 or more. (28-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.4%, +14.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (24-9 since 1997.) (72.7%, +17.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (24-9 since 1997.) (72.7%, +17.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (24-9 since 1997.) (72.7%, +17.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after scoring 80 points or more. (27-11 since 1997.) (71.1%, +15.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite. (24-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.8%, +15 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a win against a division rival. (50-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.5%, +23.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a home win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team. (70-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.1%, +38.1 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA | 74 | | 29-71 | 41.8% | 3-13 | 25.1% | 12-16 | 74.3% | 43 | 10 | 12 | NEW YORK | 72 | | 27-67 | 40.7% | 4-11 | 35.6% | 14-18 | 76.3% | 48 | 12 | 17 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, ATLANTA won the game straight up 541 times, while NEW YORK won 426 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
ATLANTA is 15-7 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 74.9 | ATLANTA is 20-11 against the money line (+9.2 Units) when they make 70% to 76% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 77.9 | ATLANTA is 15-7 against the money line (+7.7 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 72.0 | NEW YORK is 3-8 against the money line (-7.0 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents this season. The average score was NEW YORK 70.3, OPPONENT 79.6 | NEW YORK is 39-63 against the money line (-29.1 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 70.6, OPPONENT 74.2 | NEW YORK is 5-13 against the money line (-12.9 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 69.9, OPPONENT 74.7 |
|
ATLANTA is 3-9 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was ATLANTA 72.6, OPPONENT 79.7 | ATLANTA is 10-12 against the money line (-17.4 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 78.2 | ATLANTA is 10-11 against the money line (-14.3 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 77.2 | ATLANTA is 9-29 against the money line (-29.5 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 83.7 | ATLANTA is 15-17 against the money line (-15.6 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 83.9, OPPONENT 83.5 | NEW YORK is 12-4 against the money line (+8.0 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 75.2, OPPONENT 71.2 | NEW YORK is 105-76 against the money line (+22.5 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.7, OPPONENT 70.5 | NEW YORK is 44-34 against the money line (+15.7 Units) when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.9, OPPONENT 70.8 | NEW YORK is 82-78 against the money line (+21.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 81.0, OPPONENT 80.9 | NEW YORK is 11-6 against the money line (+8.8 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 75.1, OPPONENT 73.5 |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK is 2-9 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 65.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 2-7 against the money line (-8.0 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 65.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 3-9 against the money line (-9.4 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 65.8, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 5-18 against the money line (-12.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 66.8, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 6-21 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 69.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 1-6 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.1, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 11-14 against the money line (-13.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.0, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-9 against the money line (-9.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 76.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 1-8 against the money line (-9.2 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.8, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 1-6 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 70.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-9 against the money line (-9.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 76.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 1-9 against the money line (-10.9 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.1, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 4-7 against the money line (-8.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 76.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 1-6 against the money line (-6.8 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 72.7, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-7 against the money line (-8.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 76.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 18-25 against the money line (-14.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 6-12 against the money line (-11.7 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 4-10 against the money line (-11.2 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 11-21 against the money line (-14.8 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 14-28 against the money line (-19.7 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-8 against the money line (-9.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 76.4, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-8 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.7, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 6-1 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 87.0, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 135-110 against the money line (+26.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 74.0, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 13-3 against the money line (+11.1 Units) on Friday over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 10-3 against the money line (+9.6 Units) double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 8-1 against the money line (+8.3 Units) revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 8-2 against the money line (+6.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 3-9 against the money line (-8.4 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season. The average score was NEW YORK 66.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 8-17 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 70.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 2-10 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 68.7, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 2-9 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season. The average score was NEW YORK 68.7, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 2-10 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 69.6, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 6-13 against the money line (-9.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 69.3, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 1-12 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 66.7, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 7*) | NEW YORK is 3-11 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in home games after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 66.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 4-11 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in home games after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 67.7, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 3-10 against the money line (-10.7 Units) in road games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 72.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 3-10 against the money line (-10.7 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season. The average score was ATLANTA 72.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 2-7 against the money line (-6.4 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season. The average score was ATLANTA 73.4, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 18-31 against the money line (-27.4 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 2-10 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in road games after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 51-67 against the money line (-33.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-5 against the money line (-6.7 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 67.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 1-7 against the money line (-6.9 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 71.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 69-55 against the money line (+17.0 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.9, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 14-5 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after a game - attempting 20+ less free throws than opponent since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 70.4, OPPONENT 64.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 56-51 against the money line (+18.0 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 70.9, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 16-8 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 72.9, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 74-57 against the money line (+30.5 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 70.7, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 35-25 against the money line (+23.3 Units) after having lost 4 of their last 5 games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.0, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 38-36 against the money line (+17.6 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 70.6, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 104-67 against the money line (+52.9 Units) off a road loss since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.5, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 85-75 against the money line (+26.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 73.2, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 51-47 against the money line (+20.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 74.5, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 103-87 against the money line (+28.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.4, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 63-51 against the money line (+26.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 73.5, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 151-138 against the money line (+24.6 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.2, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 83-69 against the money line (+26.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.8, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 20-18 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.0, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 9-6 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season. The average score was NEW YORK 73.7, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 17-4 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in home games after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 74.3, OPPONENT 65.5 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 151-128 against the money line (+37.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 70.9, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 16-13 | -5.2 | 14-14 | 14-15 | 77.4 | 40.2 | 42.8% | 44.1 | 74.7 | 37.3 | 41.6% | 43.5 | Road Games | 3-10 | -10.6 | 3-10 | 5-8 | 72.1 | 39.0 | 40.3% | 43.7 | 79.7 | 40.6 | 45.4% | 43.3 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -3.1 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 77.0 | 37.2 | 41.2% | 46.2 | 79.8 | 34.6 | 40.5% | 45.6 | Division Games | 11-8 | -3.8 | 9-10 | 9-10 | 76.7 | 39.1 | 42.6% | 44.3 | 72.9 | 35.8 | 40.3% | 44.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.4 | 40.2 | 30-69 | 42.8% | 3-13 | 24.7% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 44 | 11 | 17 | 18 | 10 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.5 | 37.3 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 5-14 | 32.2% | 15-19 | 78.0% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.1 | 39.0 | 29-71 | 40.3% | 3-14 | 18.4% | 12-17 | 72.4% | 44 | 12 | 14 | 19 | 9 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.7 | 37.3 | 28-66 | 41.6% | 4-12 | 32.6% | 15-20 | 78.6% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 17 | 8 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 75 | 36.9 | 28-66 | 41.9% | 5-14 | 33.1% | 15-19 | 78.3% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.7 | 40.6 | 30-66 | 45.4% | 4-11 | 36.8% | 16-20 | 79.3% | 43 | 9 | 16 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 11-19 | -4 | 13-17 | 12-17 | 70.6 | 34.5 | 41.1% | 45.8 | 77.7 | 38.2 | 41.0% | 42.7 | Home Games | 6-9 | -4.6 | 5-10 | 5-10 | 67.9 | 31.9 | 39.8% | 46.7 | 75.3 | 35.5 | 40.5% | 43.1 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2.8 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 68.0 | 35.4 | 39.2% | 44.8 | 77.4 | 40.4 | 42.1% | 43.6 | Division Games | 8-11 | +1.2 | 9-10 | 8-10 | 70.7 | 35.1 | 41.5% | 45.9 | 77.0 | 38.1 | 40.4% | 42.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.6 | 34.5 | 27-66 | 41.1% | 4-10 | 34.3% | 13-17 | 75.9% | 46 | 11 | 15 | 18 | 6 | 16 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 75 | 37.2 | 28-66 | 42.5% | 4-13 | 32.2% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 67.9 | 31.9 | 26-66 | 39.8% | 3-10 | 29.3% | 13-18 | 71.8% | 47 | 11 | 14 | 16 | 6 | 16 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.7 | 38.2 | 29-70 | 41.0% | 6-18 | 33.6% | 14-18 | 78.1% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 17 | 9 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 75.8 | 37.6 | 28-67 | 42.0% | 5-14 | 32.2% | 15-19 | 78.2% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.3 | 35.5 | 28-70 | 40.5% | 6-18 | 35.2% | 12-16 | 77.0% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 9 | 12 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 70.3, NEW YORK 71.8 |
| | |
|
|
8/3/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 76-82 | L | +170 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 50 | 16 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 38 | 21 | 8/10/2013 | @ INDIANA | 66-80 | L | +120 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 29 | 14 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 38 | 13 | 8/11/2013 | NEW YORK | 82-88 | L | -360 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 34 | 8 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 50 | 16 | 8/14/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 86-88 | L | -165 | 35-75 | 46.7% | 48 | 10 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 38 | 13 | 8/16/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 88-57 | W | -450 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 38 | 17 | 22-69 | 31.9% | 47 | 21 | 8/18/2013 | WASHINGTON | 76-58 | W | -300 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 50 | 17 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 45 | 17 | 8/20/2013 | MINNESOTA | 88-75 | W | +120 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 40 | 13 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 43 | 19 | 8/23/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 64-74 | L | -140 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 50 | 14 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 42 | 9 | 8/24/2013 | CHICAGO | 56-67 | L | -175 | 20-70 | 28.6% | 47 | 22 | 23-64 | 35.9% | 53 | 20 | 8/28/2013 | WASHINGTON | 80-85 | L | -270 | 34-83 | 41.0% | 51 | 16 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 44 | 16 | 8/31/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 68-85 | L | +220 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 40 | 17 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 46 | 8 | 9/2/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 92-82 | W | +135 | 34-65 | 52.3% | 34 | 12 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 41 | 15 | 9/4/2013 | INDIANA | 89-80 | W | -200 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 59 | 16 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 44 | 15 | 9/6/2013 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/8/2013 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2013 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/15/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/31/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 88-78 | W | +200 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 53 | 16 | 28-77 | 36.4% | 40 | 11 | 8/3/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 66-88 | L | -200 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 34 | 16 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 44 | 14 | 8/6/2013 | WASHINGTON | 93-88 | W | -155 | 35-64 | 54.7% | 41 | 10 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 39 | 7 | 8/10/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 67-85 | L | +180 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 41 | 12 | 35-67 | 52.2% | 42 | 15 | 8/11/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 88-82 | W | +280 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 50 | 16 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 34 | 8 | 8/16/2013 | WASHINGTON | 57-66 | L | -140 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 46 | 15 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 40 | 10 | 8/18/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 57-88 | L | | 20-64 | 31.2% | 44 | 14 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 42 | 7 | 8/23/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 64-82 | L | +500 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 39 | 19 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 45 | 10 | 8/25/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 74-66 | W | +120 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 45 | 13 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 38 | 6 | 8/27/2013 | MINNESOTA | 47-73 | L | +300 | 18-72 | 25.0% | 50 | 12 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 54 | 15 | 8/30/2013 | INDIANA | 67-73 | L | +170 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 48 | 13 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 37 | 7 | 9/1/2013 | @ TULSA | 88-93 | L | +155 | 36-76 | 47.4% | 42 | 13 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 44 | 16 | 9/6/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/10/2013 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/15/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
NEW YORK is 15-10 (+8.7 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
NEW YORK is 7-5 (+6.1 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
NEW YORK is 7-4 (+0.8 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
NEW YORK is 3-2 (+0.3 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/11/2013 | NEW YORK | 88 | 149.5 | SU ATS | 42 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 19-20 | 95.0% | 50 | 13 | 16 | | ATLANTA | 82 | -8 | Over | 37 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 23-29 | 79.3% | 34 | 12 | 8 | 6/9/2013 | ATLANTA | 67 | -6 | Under | 33 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 43 | 11 | 18 | | NEW YORK | 76 | 149 | SU ATS | 32 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 49 | 12 | 15 | 6/7/2013 | NEW YORK | 56 | 153.5 | Under | 33 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 1-8 | 12.5% | 7-11 | 63.6% | 40 | 13 | 19 | | ATLANTA | 75 | -11 | SU ATS | 44 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 12-17 | 70.6% | 53 | 14 | 13 | 6/24/2012 | ATLANTA | 74 | 148.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 17-22 | 77.3% | 47 | 12 | 15 | | NEW YORK | 64 | -6.5 | Under | 40 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 11-17 | 64.7% | 53 | 18 | 26 | 6/19/2012 | NEW YORK | 73 | 152.5 | SU ATS | 36 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 5-6 | 83.3% | 33 | 5 | 14 | | ATLANTA | 60 | -4.5 | Under | 30 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 6-9 | 66.7% | 45 | 15 | 16 | 6/5/2012 | ATLANTA | 74 | 161 | Under | 43 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 2-12 | 16.7% | 16-22 | 72.7% | 48 | 12 | 15 | | NEW YORK | 79 | -2 | SU ATS | 48 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 45 | 8 | 18 | 5/25/2012 | NEW YORK | 74 | 161 | Over | 33 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 38 | 5 | 22 | | ATLANTA | 100 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 48 | 39-79 | 49.4% | 9-18 | 50.0% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 46 | 13 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Fred is 18-8 against the money line (+12.8 Units) off a home win in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 77.9, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 9-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 7-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 80.1, OPPONENT 68.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 3-9 against the money line (-8.4 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 66.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 14-20 against the money line (-23.6 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 72.7, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 2-9 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 68.7, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 2-9 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 65.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Bill is 2-7 against the money line (-8.0 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 65.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 3-9 against the money line (-9.4 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 65.8, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Fred is 4-11 against the money line (-10.7 Units) in road games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 74.1, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 4-11 against the money line (-10.7 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 74.1, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 2-8 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in road games after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 77.0, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 2-9 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 74.1, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 1-7 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 74.8, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 2-9 against the money line (-9.2 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 74.6, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 2-7 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 74.4, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 1-7 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 74.8, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 2-10 against the money line (-10.9 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 73.8, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 1-6 against the money line (-6.8 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 72.7, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 4-8 against the money line (-9.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 1-6 against the money line (-7.2 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 76.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 2-9 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 74.5, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 42-22 against the money line (+16.6 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 72.9, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 55-30 against the money line (+28.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 73.7, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 30-15 against the money line (+14.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 74.5, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 70-38 against the money line (+33.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 74.6, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 42-26 against the money line (+17.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 74.5, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 88-57 against the money line (+21.0 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 73.3, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 84-65 against the money line (+21.8 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 72.7, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 55-40 against the money line (+21.8 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 72.3, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 36-20 against the money line (+14.3 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 74.1, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 87-54 against the money line (+21.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 71.1, OPPONENT 68.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 34-21 against the money line (+13.2 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 76.9, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 73 times, while the home underdog won straight up 43 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 6 times, while the home underdog won straight up 5 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[G] 06/09/2013 - Essence Carson out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/19/2024 7:31:18 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|