| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
PHOENIX TULSA |
|
| 153.5 | 78 Final 66 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
651 | PHOENIX | -125 | 652 | TULSA | +105 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (368-224 since 1997.) (62.2%, +91.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more. (79-44 since 1997.) (64.2%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - off a upset loss as a favorite against opponent off a close home win by 3 points or less. (41-15 since 1997.) (73.2%, +29 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (40-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.5%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15+ games, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (47-25 since 1997.) (65.3%, +23.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (PHOENIX) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (40-15 since 1997.) (72.7%, +23.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - cold team - failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (32-7 since 1997.) (82.1%, +23.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - in a game involving two poor defensive teams (72-76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (38-14 since 1997.) (73.1%, +22.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after one or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two poor defensive teams (72-76 PPG) after 15+ games. (20-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +15.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - in a game involving two poor defensive teams (72-76 PPG), after scoring 80 points or more. (27-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.1%, +19.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (PHOENIX) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (25-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.8%, +17.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (PHOENIX) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (27-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +19.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (PHOENIX) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (22-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.9%, +16.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (22-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +19.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (286-312 since 1997.) (47.8%, +75.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws. (276-263 since 1997.) (51.2%, +72.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more. (260-108 since 1997.) (70.7%, +72.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more. (261-109 since 1997.) (70.5%, +69.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more. (243-95 since 1997.) (71.9%, +69.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (250-108 since 1997.) (69.8%, +65.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (185-124 since 1997.) (59.9%, +60.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (TULSA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season. (175-62 since 1997.) (73.8%, +59.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (189-73 since 1997.) (72.1%, +58.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (162-56 since 1997.) (74.3%, +58.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (144-87 since 1997.) (62.3%, +56.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws. (150-57 since 1997.) (72.5%, +55.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (139-54 since 1997.) (72%, +55.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games. (192-122 since 1997.) (61.1%, +54 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (160-144 since 1997.) (52.6%, +53.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season. (118-39 since 1997.) (75.2%, +51.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (89-23 since 1997.) (79.5%, +49.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games. (134-57 since 1997.) (70.2%, +49.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (125-43 since 1997.) (74.4%, +48.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (43-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.1%, +19.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in July games. (95-91 since 1997.) (51.1%, +46.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games. (39-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +17.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (133-61 since 1997.) (68.6%, +41.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games. (75-80 over the last 5 seasons.) (48.4%, +28.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (89-61 since 1997.) (59.3%, +40 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games. (83-74 since 1997.) (52.9%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game. (109-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.6%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, on Thursday nights. (93-60 since 1997.) (60.8%, +38.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after being beaten by the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in July games. (62-56 since 1997.) (52.5%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, in July games. (105-43 since 1997.) (70.9%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better. (64-31 since 1997.) (67.4%, +33.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better. (87-47 since 1997.) (64.9%, +32.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (63-43 since 1997.) (59.4%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (63-43 since 1997.) (59.4%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (63-43 since 1997.) (59.4%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (PHOENIX) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points. (68-42 since 1997.) (61.8%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (94-69 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.7%, +42.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - good defensive team (38-40.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better. (60-22 since 1997.) (73.2%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (PHOENIX) - vs. division opponents, off an home win scoring 85 or more points. (50-28 since 1997.) (64.1%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (PHOENIX) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season. (48-25 since 1997.) (65.8%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (PHOENIX) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, in May, June, or July games. (45-24 since 1997.) (65.2%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (TULSA) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in July games. (49-16 since 1997.) (75.4%, +24.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (77-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +36 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in July games. (35-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.5%, +15.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (56-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +29.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (56-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +29.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (56-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +29.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (22-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +19.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (30-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.8%, +21.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a home loss. (48-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.6%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (44-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
PHOENIX | 75 | | 28-64 | 43.1% | 5-14 | 34.3% | 15-18 | 83.0% | 42 | 7 | 12 | TULSA | 78 | | 27-72 | 38.1% | 7-20 | 35.6% | 16-20 | 78.3% | 49 | 15 | 11 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, TULSA won the game straight up 582 times, while PHOENIX won 393 times. Edge against the money line=TULSA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
PHOENIX is 25-8 against the money line (+14.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.4, OPPONENT 75.4 | PHOENIX is 11-1 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.8, OPPONENT 70.2 | PHOENIX is 6-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in road games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.3, OPPONENT 77.0 | PHOENIX is 17-6 against the money line (+13.7 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 78.8, OPPONENT 73.0 | PHOENIX is 21-6 against the money line (+12.0 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.0, OPPONENT 74.0 | PHOENIX is 17-3 against the money line (+14.2 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.4, OPPONENT 75.5 | PHOENIX is 21-10 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 84.8, OPPONENT 82.3 | TULSA is 19-42 against the money line (-23.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 79.5, OPPONENT 82.9 | TULSA is 7-29 against the money line (-25.1 Units) when they make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was TULSA 72.5, OPPONENT 82.5 | TULSA is 4-15 against the money line (-11.7 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 77.3, OPPONENT 81.5 | TULSA is 8-22 against the money line (-15.9 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 75.8, OPPONENT 80.5 | TULSA is 11-27 against the money line (-19.3 Units) in home games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was TULSA 80.3, OPPONENT 80.6 |
|
PHOENIX is 86-98 against the money line (-43.7 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 75.5, OPPONENT 75.7 | PHOENIX is 54-68 against the money line (-29.6 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 78.6, OPPONENT 79.4 | PHOENIX is 22-20 against the money line (-18.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.7, OPPONENT 85.7 | PHOENIX is 54-82 against the money line (-48.1 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 76.3, OPPONENT 78.5 | TULSA is 7-2 against the money line (+7.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was TULSA 88.4, OPPONENT 80.7 |
|
| | |
|
PHOENIX is 11-2 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.8, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 17-4 against the money line (+10.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.7, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 23-3 against the money line (+19.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 84.3, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 6*) | PHOENIX is 34-10 against the money line (+17.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 22-2 against the money line (+20.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 84.3, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 7*) | PHOENIX is 32-7 against the money line (+21.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.8, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 4*) | PHOENIX is 26-3 against the money line (+22.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 84.0, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 7*) | PHOENIX is 39-10 against the money line (+22.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.0, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 16-2 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.7, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 5*) | PHOENIX is 26-7 against the money line (+15.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.5, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 10-3 against the money line (+6.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.3, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 26-12 against the money line (+12.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 26-3 against the money line (+22.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 84.0, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 7*) | PHOENIX is 36-7 against the money line (+25.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.7, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 5*) | PHOENIX is 22-3 against the money line (+18.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 84.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 6*) | PHOENIX is 30-8 against the money line (+16.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 15-3 against the money line (+11.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.4, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 20-5 against the money line (+14.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.6, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 18-4 against the money line (+10.9 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.3, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 20-2 against the money line (+18.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 84.8, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 6*) | PHOENIX is 29-6 against the money line (+21.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.3, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 5*) | TULSA is 2-12 against the money line (-10.7 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) since 1997. The average score was TULSA 71.8, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 5-11 against the money line (-9.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 74.5, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 3-11 against the money line (-9.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 77.7, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 11-35 against the money line (-21.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997. The average score was TULSA 77.6, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 10-23 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 78.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 6-15 against the money line (-12.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 75.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
PHOENIX is 84-94 against the money line (-48.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 80.5, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
PHOENIX is 45-13 against the money line (+23.3 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 42-9 against the money line (+20.9 Units) as a favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.4, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 29-18 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in road games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 79.8, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 29-18 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 79.8, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 26-16 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 30-7 against the money line (+19.6 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.4, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 19-11 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 24-3 against the money line (+18.9 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 84.4, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 4*) | PHOENIX is 19-2 against the money line (+16.1 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.6, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 5*) | PHOENIX is 18-2 against the money line (+15.6 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 85.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 5*) | PHOENIX is 185-130 against the money line (+29.2 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 80.8, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 14-2 against the money line (+12.9 Units) after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 84.3, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 5*) | PHOENIX is 20-2 against the money line (+19.0 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.5, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 7*) | PHOENIX is 19-6 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.4, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 25-4 against the money line (+19.2 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.2, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 4*) | PHOENIX is 23-5 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.7, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 22-5 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.7, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 9-2 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in road games off a no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 79.0, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 7-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in road games off a home no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 78.4, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 8-2 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in road games after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 9-5 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in road games off a close home win by 3 points or less since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 80.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 21-6 against the money line (+11.3 Units) off a home win over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.4, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 17-4 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.0, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 12-2 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 8-3 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.4, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 21-2 against the money line (+20.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.0, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 8*) | PHOENIX is 23-9 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.8, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 18-0 against the money line (+18.8 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 84.8, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 36-9 against the money line (+21.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.0, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 25-7 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.7, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 23-4 against the money line (+18.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.6, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 5*) | PHOENIX is 60-49 against the money line (+19.1 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 87.2, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 38-11 against the money line (+22.2 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 31-10 against the money line (+15.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.2, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 26-8 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 22-6 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.6, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 23-6 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.7, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 23-7 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 21-4 against the money line (+15.1 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.5, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 8-2 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in road games after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 79.0, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 12-2 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.9, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 6*) | PHOENIX is 15-3 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 84.2, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 18-3 against the money line (+14.1 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 4*) | PHOENIX is 14-2 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 84.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 4*) | PHOENIX is 10-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.8, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 6-15 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 79.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 34-80 against the money line (-37.4 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997. The average score was TULSA 77.7, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 3-16 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 77.5, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
TULSA is 6-1 against the money line (+7.7 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent this season. The average score was TULSA 79.0, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 10-7 | -0.7 | 5-11 | 7-10 | 77.2 | 37.0 | 43.2% | 40.0 | 73.9 | 35.4 | 40.3% | 44.8 | Road Games | 3-5 | -3.3 | 3-5 | 4-4 | 74.4 | 35.0 | 40.5% | 38.2 | 75.5 | 36.4 | 44.2% | 43.9 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -2.8 | 0-5 | 1-4 | 75.4 | 36.4 | 44.1% | 38.8 | 72.6 | 38.6 | 38.2% | 45.6 | Division Games | 8-3 | +4.6 | 4-6 | 4-7 | 78.4 | 39.0 | 45.4% | 38.4 | 71.7 | 34.3 | 41.4% | 40.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.2 | 37.0 | 28-65 | 43.2% | 5-14 | 35.4% | 16-19 | 82.8% | 40 | 7 | 16 | 19 | 9 | 11 | 7 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.7 | 37.9 | 28-65 | 42.8% | 5-15 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 78.7% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 74.4 | 35.0 | 27-66 | 40.5% | 6-16 | 38.1% | 15-19 | 79.9% | 38 | 7 | 15 | 19 | 9 | 10 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.9 | 35.4 | 28-68 | 40.3% | 5-15 | 33.6% | 14-17 | 79.1% | 45 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 74.3 | 36.8 | 28-65 | 42.6% | 5-14 | 32.2% | 15-18 | 79.4% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 75.5 | 36.4 | 28-64 | 44.2% | 5-13 | 36.6% | 15-18 | 80.1% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 17 | 5 | 14 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 10-8 | +3.2 | 10-6 | 7-11 | 78.1 | 41.4 | 38.8% | 45.3 | 75.4 | 36.8 | 43.5% | 41.5 | Home Games | 6-2 | +3.4 | 4-3 | 2-6 | 80.5 | 43.9 | 40.4% | 45.6 | 71.5 | 33.2 | 41.2% | 37.4 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -4.6 | 1-3 | 1-4 | 72.2 | 38.8 | 35.8% | 46.4 | 74.0 | 36.0 | 42.9% | 43.6 | Division Games | 6-6 | +0.7 | 7-5 | 3-9 | 76.2 | 38.8 | 38.6% | 45.6 | 73.9 | 34.2 | 43.0% | 41.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.1 | 41.4 | 27-70 | 38.8% | 7-20 | 34.8% | 17-21 | 78.3% | 45 | 13 | 15 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.1 | 37.7 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 5-15 | 32.7% | 14-18 | 78.8% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.5 | 43.9 | 27-67 | 40.4% | 7-19 | 37.4% | 19-23 | 83.1% | 46 | 11 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.4 | 36.8 | 27-63 | 43.5% | 4-14 | 31.6% | 16-20 | 79.0% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 21 | 6 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 74.4 | 36.8 | 28-64 | 43.1% | 5-14 | 32.6% | 14-18 | 80.2% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 71.5 | 33.2 | 26-62 | 41.2% | 5-15 | 33.1% | 15-18 | 85.4% | 37 | 7 | 14 | 22 | 7 | 14 | 6 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: PHOENIX 69.8, TULSA 70.4 |
| | |
|
|
6/21/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 84-72 | W | -140 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 36 | 8 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 43 | 15 | 6/25/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 71-76 | L | -140 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 37 | 10 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 54 | 19 | 6/27/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 56-71 | L | +210 | 19-57 | 33.3% | 42 | 20 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 40 | 12 | 6/30/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 85-78 | W | -600 | 34-57 | 59.6% | 32 | 11 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 32 | 10 | 7/2/2015 | TULSA | 86-55 | W | -330 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 43 | 13 | 20-71 | 28.2% | 43 | 13 | 7/5/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 94-91 | W | -165 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 38 | 4 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 42 | 8 | 7/10/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 94-79 | W | -360 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 39 | 10 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 32 | 15 | 7/12/2015 | SEATTLE | 70-60 | W | | 25-61 | 41.0% | 44 | 13 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 37 | 12 | 7/14/2015 | ATLANTA | 80-71 | W | -550 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 41 | 10 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 39 | 14 | 7/18/2015 | NEW YORK | 73-75 | L | -300 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 36 | 12 | 25-77 | 32.5% | 61 | 9 | 7/21/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 65-70 | L | -175 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 30 | 7 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 38 | 10 | 7/28/2015 | CHICAGO | 89-87 | W | -175 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 43 | 13 | 33-86 | 38.4% | 53 | 12 | 7/30/2015 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2015 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2015 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/21/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 86-78 | W | +250 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 44 | 11 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 32 | 16 | 6/26/2015 | NEW YORK | 71-62 | W | -450 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 34 | 13 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 44 | 26 | 6/28/2015 | SEATTLE | 93-89 | W | -850 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 43 | 13 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 30 | 9 | 6/30/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 69-74 | L | -140 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 43 | 10 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 42 | 9 | 7/2/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 55-86 | L | +250 | 20-71 | 28.2% | 43 | 13 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 43 | 13 | 7/3/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 95-98 | L | +180 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 40 | 10 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 41 | 9 | 7/7/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 85-75 | W | +175 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 48 | 18 | 31-80 | 38.7% | 54 | 17 | 7/11/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 82-67 | W | -210 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 41 | 5 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 42 | 13 | 7/15/2015 | @ INDIANA | 80-83 | L | +135 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 48 | 12 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 50 | 13 | 7/17/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 58-65 | L | -200 | 21-68 | 30.9% | 45 | 11 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 54 | 15 | 7/19/2015 | MINNESOTA | 72-79 | L | +135 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 38 | 13 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 41 | 11 | 7/21/2015 | WASHINGTON | 69-76 | L | -165 | 23-73 | 31.5% | 60 | 14 | 25-56 | 44.6% | 31 | 8 | 7/30/2015 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/1/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2015 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/15/2015 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
PHOENIX is 32-15 (+20.5 Units) against the money line versus TULSA since 1997 |
| |
PHOENIX is 8-1 (+5.8 Units) against the money line versus TULSA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
PHOENIX is 15-9 (+11.4 Units) against the money line versus TULSA since 1997 |
| |
PHOENIX is 3-1 (+0.8 Units) against the money line versus TULSA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/2/2015 | TULSA | 55 | 149.5 | Under | 29 | 20-71 | 28.2% | 4-22 | 18.2% | 11-17 | 64.7% | 43 | 15 | 13 | | PHOENIX | 86 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 47 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 43 | 3 | 13 | 6/29/2014 | PHOENIX | 80 | -4.5 | SU Under | 31 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 28-31 | 90.3% | 33 | 3 | 13 | | TULSA | 77 | 165 | ATS | 37 | 24-77 | 31.2% | 5-21 | 23.8% | 24-25 | 96.0% | 50 | 18 | 12 | 6/20/2014 | TULSA | 80 | 163 | ATS | 38 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 2-18 | 11.1% | 16-22 | 72.7% | 54 | 20 | 5 | | PHOENIX | 91 | -11.5 | SU Over | 45 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 5-9 | 55.6% | 18-21 | 85.7% | 35 | 9 | 8 | 6/6/2014 | PHOENIX | 78 | -5.5 | Over | 33 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 1-7 | 14.3% | 29-34 | 85.3% | 33 | 10 | 15 | | TULSA | 94 | 162.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 20-26 | 76.9% | 42 | 14 | 14 | 5/30/2014 | TULSA | 78 | 160 | Over | 36 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 9-24 | 37.5% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 32 | 8 | 17 | | PHOENIX | 100 | -9 | SU ATS | 47 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 10-15 | 66.7% | 34-39 | 87.2% | 38 | 9 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Sandy is 45-13 against the money line (+23.3 Units) in all games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 42-9 against the money line (+20.9 Units) as a favorite as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.4, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 30-7 against the money line (+19.6 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.4, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 24-3 against the money line (+18.9 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 84.4, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Sandy is 19-2 against the money line (+16.1 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.6, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 5*) | Sandy is 18-2 against the money line (+15.6 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 85.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 5*) | Sandy is 14-2 against the money line (+12.9 Units) after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 84.3, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 5*) | Sandy is 20-2 against the money line (+19.0 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.5, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 7*) | Sandy is 25-4 against the money line (+19.2 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.2, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Sandy is 23-5 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.7, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 22-5 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.7, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 21-6 against the money line (+11.3 Units) off a home win as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.4, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 17-4 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.0, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 12-2 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 21-2 against the money line (+20.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.0, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 8*) | Sandy is 18-0 against the money line (+18.8 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 84.8, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 36-9 against the money line (+21.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.0, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 25-7 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.7, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 23-4 against the money line (+18.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.6, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 5*) | Sandy is 38-11 against the money line (+22.2 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 31-10 against the money line (+15.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.2, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 26-8 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 22-6 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.6, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 23-6 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.7, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 23-7 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 21-4 against the money line (+15.1 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.5, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 15-3 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 84.2, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 18-3 against the money line (+14.1 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Sandy is 14-2 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 84.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Sandy is 10-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.8, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 11-2 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.8, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 17-4 against the money line (+10.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.7, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 23-3 against the money line (+19.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 84.3, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 6*) | Sandy is 34-10 against the money line (+17.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 22-2 against the money line (+20.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 84.3, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 7*) | Sandy is 32-7 against the money line (+21.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.8, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Sandy is 26-3 against the money line (+22.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 84.0, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 7*) | Sandy is 39-10 against the money line (+22.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.0, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 16-2 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.7, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 5*) | Sandy is 26-7 against the money line (+15.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.5, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 10-3 against the money line (+6.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.3, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 26-3 against the money line (+22.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 84.0, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 7*) | Sandy is 36-7 against the money line (+25.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.7, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 5*) | Sandy is 22-3 against the money line (+18.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 84.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 6*) | Sandy is 30-8 against the money line (+16.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 15-3 against the money line (+11.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.4, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 20-5 against the money line (+14.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.6, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 12-2 against the money line (+10.6 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Sandy 84.3, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 18-4 against the money line (+10.9 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.3, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 20-2 against the money line (+18.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 84.8, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 6*) | Sandy is 29-6 against the money line (+21.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.3, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 5*) | Fred is 6-15 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in July games as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 79.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 7-15 against the money line (-14.0 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 74.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 2-9 against the money line (-11.0 Units) off an upset loss as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 78.4, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 4-15 against the money line (-15.2 Units) off a home loss in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 79.1, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 3-16 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 77.5, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 22-41 against the money line (-32.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 77.7, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 19-32 against the money line (-25.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.9, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 3-11 against the money line (-10.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 78.0, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 8-22 against the money line (-14.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.7, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 11-24 against the money line (-25.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 74.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 22-35 against the money line (-26.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 17-29 against the money line (-28.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 77.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 29-43 against the money line (-31.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 78.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 12-25 against the money line (-18.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.6, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 21-40 against the money line (-23.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 78.0, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 5-17 against the money line (-13.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.9, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Fred is 16-5 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in home games after playing a game as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 81.7, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 14-5 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 81.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 68 times, while the home underdog won straight up 54 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 6 times, while the home underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 07/28/2015 - Marta Xargay Casademont expected to miss a week ( Ankle ) | [G] 06/04/2015 - Diana Taurasi out for season ( Personal ) | [G] 06/04/2015 - Eshaya Murphy out for season ( Knee ) | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/21/2024 2:07:08 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|