| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
PHOENIX
First Half Results
TULSA |
|
|
75.5
| 31
Final
40 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | | |
|
 - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(112-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.2%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season.
(85-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +32.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(50-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.5%, +29.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(44-14 since 1997.) (75.9%, +28.6 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (PHOENIX) - vs. division opponents, off a close home win by 3 points or less.
(151-94 since 1997.) (61.6%, +47.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (PHOENIX) - after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(54-25 since 1997.) (68.4%, +26.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (PHOENIX) - after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(46-17 since 1997.) (73%, +27.3 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in July games.
(469-346 since 1997.) (57.5%, +88.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - vs. division opponents.
(979-763 since 1997.) (56.2%, +139.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(88-52 since 1997.) (62.9%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(88-52 since 1997.) (62.9%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(88-52 since 1997.) (62.9%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team, in July games.
(113-63 since 1997.) (64.2%, +43.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team, in May, June, or July games.
(183-119 since 1997.) (60.6%, +52.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games, in July games.
(79-38 since 1997.) (67.5%, +37.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games.
(80-39 since 1997.) (67.2%, +37.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(800-573 since 1997.) (58.3%, +169.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(207-132 since 1997.) (61.1%, +61.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(206-128 since 1997.) (61.7%, +65.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points.
(592-438 since 1997.) (57.5%, +110.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(422-296 since 1997.) (58.8%, +96.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(106-59 since 1997.) (64.2%, +41.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a blowout loss versus opponent by 30 points or more.
(29-8 since 1997.) (78.4%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a loss where team scored less than 60 points, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(44-16 since 1997.) (73.3%, +26.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a loss where team scored less than 60 points against opponent off a home win.
(66-30 since 1997.) (68.8%, +33 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(572-402 since 1997.) (58.7%, +129.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent.
(629-445 since 1997.) (58.6%, +139.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(166-98 since 1997.) (62.9%, +58.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(167-102 since 1997.) (62.1%, +54.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(349-245 since 1997.) (58.8%, +79.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(91-49 since 1997.) (65%, +37.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a road blowout loss versus opponent by 30 points or more.
(26-4 since 1997.) (86.7%, +21.6 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, poor shooting team - shooting <=40% on the season.
(91-52 since 1997.) (63.6%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, in July games.
(228-156 since 1997.) (59.4%, +56.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - in July games.
(469-346 since 1997.) (57.5%, +88.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - vs. division opponents.
(979-763 since 1997.) (56.2%, +139.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - vs. division opponents, after a non-conference game.
(290-193 since 1997.) (60%, +77.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after a non-conference game.
(620-453 since 1997.) (57.8%, +121.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(111-67 since 1997.) (62.4%, +37.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(639-476 since 1997.) (57.3%, +115.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(54-26 since 1997.) (67.5%, +25.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(154-99 since 1997.) (60.9%, +45.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - good defensive team (38-40.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%).
(120-73 since 1997.) (62.2%, +39.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - good defensive team (38-40.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games.
(92-44 since 1997.) (67.6%, +43.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - good defensive team (38-40.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(44-13 since 1997.) (77.2%, +29.7 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(348-242 since 1997.) (59%, +81.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning record on the season.
(314-219 since 1997.) (58.9%, +73.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games.
(270-182 since 1997.) (59.7%, +69.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning record on the season.
(257-172 since 1997.) (59.9%, +67.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - with a winning record on the season.
(704-522 since 1997.) (57.4%, +129.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - with a winning record on the season, in July games.
(230-136 since 1997.) (62.8%, +80.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - with a winning record on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(398-273 since 1997.) (59.3%, +97.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(470-346 since 1997.) (57.6%, +89.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games, in July games.
(157-95 since 1997.) (62.3%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games.
(164-97 since 1997.) (62.8%, +57.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team, in July games.
(114-63 since 1997.) (64.4%, +44.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team, in May, June, or July games.
(192-124 since 1997.) (60.8%, +55.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games, in July games.
(78-38 since 1997.) (67.2%, +36.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games.
(82-38 since 1997.) (68.3%, +40.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(251-165 since 1997.) (60.3%, +69.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(126-81 since 1997.) (60.9%, +36.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(182-120 since 1997.) (60.3%, +50 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team.
(143-91 since 1997.) (61.1%, +42.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - off a home win, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(95-50 since 1997.) (65.5%, +40 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - off a home win, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team.
(55-24 since 1997.) (69.6%, +28.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in July games.
(159-87 since 1997.) (64.6%, +63.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in May, June, or July games.
(275-192 since 1997.) (58.9%, +63.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(813-585 since 1997.) (58.2%, +169.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(254-163 since 1997.) (60.9%, +74.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(520-378 since 1997.) (57.9%, +104.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(466-322 since 1997.) (59.1%, +111.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(302-205 since 1997.) (59.6%, +76.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(243-166 since 1997.) (59.4%, +60.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(166-105 since 1997.) (61.3%, +50.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(141-82 since 1997.) (63.2%, +50.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(103-57 since 1997.) (64.4%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team.
(80-41 since 1997.) (66.1%, +34.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games.
(62-28 since 1997.) (68.9%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| PHOENIX | 75 | | 38 | | 28-64 | 43.1% | 5-14 | 34.3% | 15-18 | 83.0% | 42 | 7 | 12 | | TULSA | 78 | | 39 | | 27-72 | 38.1% | 7-20 | 35.6% | 16-20 | 78.3% | 49 | 15 | 11 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, TULSA covered the first half line 573 times, while PHOENIX covered the first half line 382 times.
Edge against first half line=TULSA | In 1000 simulated games, 617 games went over first half total, while 383 games went under first half total.
Edge against first half total=Over |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
PHOENIX is 13-3 against the 1rst half line (+9.7 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.1, OPPONENT 35.6 |
|
PHOENIX is 128-188 against the 1rst half line (-78.8 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 40.7, OPPONENT 43.0 | PHOENIX is 49-88 against the 1rst half line (-47.8 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.4, OPPONENT 38.1 | TULSA is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots this season.
The average score was TULSA 40.9, OPPONENT 37.7 | TULSA is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was TULSA 40.3, OPPONENT 36.8 |
|
PHOENIX is 11-1 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 44.5, OPPONENT 37.6 | PHOENIX is 17-3 OVER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 42.5, OPPONENT 40.4 | PHOENIX is 23-12 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 41.3, OPPONENT 38.3 | TULSA is 24-11 OVER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 39.9, OPPONENT 42.7 | TULSA is 18-8 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 41.7, OPPONENT 42.3 |
|
PHOENIX is 107-75 UNDER (+24.5 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.7, OPPONENT 36.5 | PHOENIX is 80-31 UNDER (+45.9 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.5, OPPONENT 33.2 | PHOENIX is 92-61 UNDER (+24.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.4, OPPONENT 36.7 | PHOENIX is 116-86 UNDER (+21.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.3, OPPONENT 37.2 | PHOENIX is 109-74 UNDER (+27.6 Units) the 1rst half total in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.8, OPPONENT 37.1 | PHOENIX is 56-33 UNDER (+19.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 35.9, OPPONENT 36.0 | TULSA is 21-9 UNDER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 34.4, OPPONENT 36.9 |
|
| | | | |
|
TULSA is 3-13 against the 1rst half line (-11.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 34.1, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.6, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 35.4, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 1-9 against the 1rst half line (-8.9 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 1-9 against the 1rst half line (-8.9 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.2, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
PHOENIX is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 35.4, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
PHOENIX is 182-122 UNDER (+47.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.6, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 118-75 UNDER (+35.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.5, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 133-95 UNDER (+28.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.0, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 183-144 UNDER (+24.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.0, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 117-77 UNDER (+32.3 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.7, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 164-113 UNDER (+39.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.4, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 214-151 UNDER (+47.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.7, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 302-225 UNDER (+54.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.4, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 78-47 UNDER (+26.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.4, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 105-72 UNDER (+25.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.3, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 44-25 UNDER (+16.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.8, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 48-30 UNDER (+15.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.6, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.4, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
PHOENIX is 25-12 against the 1rst half line (+11.8 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 41.8, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 18-5 against the 1rst half line (+12.5 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.3, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.9, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 18-6 against the 1rst half line (+11.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 42.4, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.7, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 16-3 against the 1rst half line (+12.7 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.1, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 4*) | PHOENIX is 20-8 against the 1rst half line (+11.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 42.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 13-3 against the 1rst half line (+9.7 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.4, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 45.8, OPPONENT 31.2 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 8-0 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) in road games after failing to cover the spread in 5 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 39.6, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) in home games in July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) in home games after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 36.6, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 16-34 against the 1rst half line (-21.4 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 37.5, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 5-17 against the 1rst half line (-13.7 Units) in home games after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 37.6, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) in home games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.1, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
PHOENIX is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.6, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.0, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) versus the first half line in all games this season.
The average score was TULSA 41.4, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was TULSA 41.4, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.8, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was TULSA 43.0, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
PHOENIX is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total off an home win scoring 85 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 42.9, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total on Thursday over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 39.0, OPPONENT 46.0 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 12-3 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 39.6, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 41.2, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 7-0 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 3 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 40.4, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 40.4, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
PHOENIX is 360-285 UNDER (+46.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.5, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 189-133 UNDER (+42.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.3, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 145-103 UNDER (+31.7 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.2, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 121-78 UNDER (+35.2 Units) the 1rst half total in July games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.8, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 230-187 UNDER (+24.3 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.0, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 238-172 UNDER (+48.8 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.4, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 86-56 UNDER (+24.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.9, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 156-122 UNDER (+21.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.4, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 178-138 UNDER (+26.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 39.1, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 86-56 UNDER (+24.4 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.5, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 130-86 UNDER (+35.4 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.2, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 95-63 UNDER (+25.7 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.5, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 66-43 UNDER (+18.7 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.6, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 24-12 UNDER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 39.1, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 18-7 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.7, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 59-38 UNDER (+17.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a win by 6 points or less since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.7, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 92-64 UNDER (+21.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.7, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 46-28 UNDER (+15.2 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.9, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 196-135 UNDER (+47.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.9, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 10-7 | -0.7 | 5-11 | 7-10 | 77.2 | 37.0 | 43.2% | 40.0 | 73.9 | 35.4 | 40.3% | 44.8 | | Road Games | 3-5 | -3.3 | 3-5 | 4-4 | 74.4 | 35.0 | 40.5% | 38.2 | 75.5 | 36.4 | 44.2% | 43.9 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -2.8 | 0-5 | 1-4 | 75.4 | 36.4 | 44.1% | 38.8 | 72.6 | 38.6 | 38.2% | 45.6 | | Division Games | 8-3 | +4.6 | 4-6 | 4-7 | 78.4 | 39.0 | 45.4% | 38.4 | 71.7 | 34.3 | 41.4% | 40.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 77.2 | 37.0 | 28-65 | 43.2% | 5-14 | 35.4% | 16-19 | 82.8% | 40 | 7 | 16 | 19 | 9 | 11 | 7 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75.7 | 37.9 | 28-65 | 42.8% | 5-15 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 78.7% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 74.4 | 35.0 | 27-66 | 40.5% | 6-16 | 38.1% | 15-19 | 79.9% | 38 | 7 | 15 | 19 | 9 | 10 | 6 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.9 | 35.4 | 28-68 | 40.3% | 5-15 | 33.6% | 14-17 | 79.1% | 45 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 74.3 | 36.8 | 28-65 | 42.6% | 5-14 | 32.2% | 15-18 | 79.4% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 75.5 | 36.4 | 28-64 | 44.2% | 5-13 | 36.6% | 15-18 | 80.1% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 17 | 5 | 14 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 10-8 | +3.2 | 10-6 | 7-11 | 78.1 | 41.4 | 38.8% | 45.3 | 75.4 | 36.8 | 43.5% | 41.5 | | Home Games | 6-2 | +3.4 | 4-3 | 2-6 | 80.5 | 43.9 | 40.4% | 45.6 | 71.5 | 33.2 | 41.2% | 37.4 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -4.6 | 1-3 | 1-4 | 72.2 | 38.8 | 35.8% | 46.4 | 74.0 | 36.0 | 42.9% | 43.6 | | Division Games | 6-6 | +0.7 | 7-5 | 3-9 | 76.2 | 38.8 | 38.6% | 45.6 | 73.9 | 34.2 | 43.0% | 41.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 78.1 | 41.4 | 27-70 | 38.8% | 7-20 | 34.8% | 17-21 | 78.3% | 45 | 13 | 15 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75.1 | 37.7 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 5-15 | 32.7% | 14-18 | 78.8% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.5 | 43.9 | 27-67 | 40.4% | 7-19 | 37.4% | 19-23 | 83.1% | 46 | 11 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.4 | 36.8 | 27-63 | 43.5% | 4-14 | 31.6% | 16-20 | 79.0% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 21 | 6 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 74.4 | 36.8 | 28-64 | 43.1% | 5-14 | 32.6% | 14-18 | 80.2% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 71.5 | 33.2 | 26-62 | 41.2% | 5-15 | 33.1% | 15-18 | 85.4% | 37 | 7 | 14 | 22 | 7 | 14 | 6 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: PHOENIX 69.8, TULSA 70.4 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/21/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 84-72 | 44-36 | -1.5 | W | 70.5 | O | 27-65 | 41.5% | 36 | 8 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 43 | 15 | | 6/25/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 71-76 | 27-32 | -1.5 | L | 73 | U | 27-74 | 36.5% | 37 | 10 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 54 | 19 | | 6/27/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 56-71 | 23-37 | 3.5 | L | 74 | U | 19-57 | 33.3% | 42 | 20 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 40 | 12 | | 6/30/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 85-78 | 43-32 | -6 | W | 73.5 | O | 34-57 | 59.6% | 32 | 11 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 32 | 10 | | 7/2/2015 | TULSA | 86-55 | 47-29 | -4 | W | 73.5 | O | 35-63 | 55.6% | 43 | 13 | 20-71 | 28.2% | 43 | 13 | | 7/5/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 94-91 | 42-46 | -2 | L | 76.5 | O | 34-67 | 50.7% | 38 | 4 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 42 | 8 | | 7/10/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 94-79 | 46-34 | -4.5 | W | 72.5 | O | 37-71 | 52.1% | 39 | 10 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 32 | 15 | | 7/12/2015 | SEATTLE | 70-60 | 41-27 | -8.5 | W | 74 | U | 25-61 | 41.0% | 44 | 13 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 37 | 12 | | 7/14/2015 | ATLANTA | 80-71 | 38-48 | -6 | L | 75 | O | 26-57 | 45.6% | 41 | 10 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 39 | 14 | | 7/18/2015 | NEW YORK | 73-75 | 37-36 | -3.5 | L | 73.5 | U | 28-65 | 43.1% | 36 | 12 | 25-77 | 32.5% | 61 | 9 | | 7/21/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 65-70 | 35-38 | -2 | L | 74 | U | 27-60 | 45.0% | 30 | 7 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 38 | 10 | | 7/28/2015 | CHICAGO | 89-87 | 31-44 | -2 | L | 79 | U | 32-70 | 45.7% | 43 | 13 | 33-86 | 38.4% | 53 | 12 | | 7/30/2015 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2015 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2015 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/21/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 86-78 | 38-38 | 4 | W | 78 | U | 33-74 | 44.6% | 44 | 11 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 32 | 16 | | 6/26/2015 | NEW YORK | 71-62 | 45-41 | -5 | L | 74.5 | O | 21-62 | 33.9% | 34 | 13 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 44 | 26 | | 6/28/2015 | SEATTLE | 93-89 | 45-42 | -7 | L | 74 | O | 29-65 | 44.6% | 43 | 13 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 30 | 9 | | 6/30/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 69-74 | 40-32 | -1.5 | W | 74 | U | 23-65 | 35.4% | 43 | 10 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 42 | 9 | | 7/2/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 55-86 | 29-47 | 4 | L | 73.5 | O | 20-71 | 28.2% | 43 | 13 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 43 | 13 | | 7/3/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 95-98 | 42-42 | 3 | W | 73.5 | O | 32-71 | 45.1% | 40 | 10 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 41 | 9 | | 7/7/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 85-75 | 48-41 | 2.5 | W | 75 | O | 25-63 | 39.7% | 48 | 18 | 31-80 | 38.7% | 54 | 17 | | 7/11/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 82-67 | 40-31 | -2.5 | W | 78 | U | 26-69 | 37.7% | 41 | 5 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 42 | 13 | | 7/15/2015 | @ INDIANA | 80-83 | 45-52 | 1.5 | L | 79 | O | 30-75 | 40.0% | 48 | 12 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 50 | 13 | | 7/17/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 58-65 | 35-32 | -2.5 | W | 74.5 | U | 21-68 | 30.9% | 45 | 11 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 54 | 15 | | 7/19/2015 | MINNESOTA | 72-79 | 34-27 | 1.5 | W | 74.5 | U | 25-64 | 39.1% | 38 | 13 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 41 | 11 | | 7/21/2015 | WASHINGTON | 69-76 | 40-38 | -2 | T | 74 | O | 23-73 | 31.5% | 60 | 14 | 25-56 | 44.6% | 31 | 8 | | 7/30/2015 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/1/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2015 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/15/2015 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| PHOENIX is 29-21 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA since 1997 | | 27 of 49 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| PHOENIX is 5-4 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA over the last 3 seasons | | 6 of 9 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| PHOENIX is 14-10 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA since 1997 | | 13 of 24 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| TULSA is 4-0 versus the first half line when playing against PHOENIX over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 4 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/2/2015 | TULSA | 55 | 149.5 | Under | 29 | 20-71 | 28.2% | 4-22 | 18.2% | 11-17 | 64.7% | 43 | 15 | 13 | | | PHOENIX | 86 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 47 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 43 | 3 | 13 | 6/29/2014 | PHOENIX | 80 | -4.5 | SU Under | 31 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 28-31 | 90.3% | 33 | 3 | 13 | | | TULSA | 77 | 165 | ATS | 37 | 24-77 | 31.2% | 5-21 | 23.8% | 24-25 | 96.0% | 50 | 18 | 12 | 6/20/2014 | TULSA | 80 | 163 | ATS | 38 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 2-18 | 11.1% | 16-22 | 72.7% | 54 | 20 | 5 | | | PHOENIX | 91 | -11.5 | SU Over | 45 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 5-9 | 55.6% | 18-21 | 85.7% | 35 | 9 | 8 | 6/6/2014 | PHOENIX | 78 | -5.5 | Over | 33 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 1-7 | 14.3% | 29-34 | 85.3% | 33 | 10 | 15 | | | TULSA | 94 | 162.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 20-26 | 76.9% | 42 | 14 | 14 | 5/30/2014 | TULSA | 78 | 160 | Over | 36 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 9-24 | 37.5% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 32 | 8 | 17 | | | PHOENIX | 100 | -9 | SU ATS | 47 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 10-15 | 66.7% | 34-39 | 87.2% | 38 | 9 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Sandy is 25-12 against the 1rst half line (+11.8 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 41.8, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 18-5 against the 1rst half line (+12.5 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.3, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.9, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 18-6 against the 1rst half line (+11.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 42.4, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.7, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 16-3 against the 1rst half line (+12.7 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.1, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Sandy is 20-8 against the 1rst half line (+11.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 42.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 13-3 against the 1rst half line (+9.7 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.4, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 45.8, OPPONENT 31.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) in home games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.1, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.6, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 1-9 against the 1rst half line (-8.9 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 1-9 against the 1rst half line (-8.9 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.2, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Sandy is 11-24 against the 1rst half line (-15.4 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Sandy 35.7, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) in road games on Thursday in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Sandy 34.2, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Sandy 33.3, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.6, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Sandy 33.9, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 11-25 against the 1rst half line (-16.5 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Sandy 37.0, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 6-16 against the 1rst half line (-11.6 Units) in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Sandy 36.4, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 21-9 against the 1rst half line (+11.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 39.4, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 18-6 against the 1rst half line (+11.4 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 39.9, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Sandy is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total off an home win scoring 85 or more points as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 42.9, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total on Thursday as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 39.0, OPPONENT 46.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 40-20 OVER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 39.3, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 32-17 OVER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 39.6, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 10-1 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a blowout loss versus opponent by 20 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 40.9, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 10-1 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a road blowout loss versus opponent by 20 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 40.9, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 41.2, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 40.4, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Sandy is 19-6 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Sandy 34.7, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a game where they failed to cover the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Sandy 36.6, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Sandy 33.3, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Sandy 35.5, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Sandy 36.4, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home underdog covered the first half line 61 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 59 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog covered the first half line 6 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 3 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 20 games went under the first half total, while 17 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 8 games went over the first half total, while 7 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite covered the first half line 2 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 2 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite covered the first half line 1 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 1 times. | | Since 1997, 3 games went over the first half total, while 1 games went under the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 1 games went over the first half total, while 1 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
| [G] 07/28/2015 - Marta Xargay Casademont expected to miss a week ( Ankle ) | | [G] 06/04/2015 - Diana Taurasi out for season ( Personal ) | | [G] 06/04/2015 - Eshaya Murphy out for season ( Knee ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/3/2024 10:23:44 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|