| | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
SEATTLE First Half Results CONNECTICUT |
|
| 73 | 40 Final 38 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
601 | SEATTLE | 72.5 | 602 | CONNECTICUT | -3.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | |
|
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - off a upset loss as a favorite, playing with 2 days rest. (172-111 since 1997.) (60.8%, +49.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games. (57-26 since 1997.) (68.7%, +28.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread. (38-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +17.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread. (23-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.2%, +14.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread. (55-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +27.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (SEATTLE) - revenging a home loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a road loss. (51-22 since 1997.) (69.9%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (SEATTLE) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (32-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (78%, +22.1 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (39-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.9%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (37-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.5%, +23.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (27-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.1%, +18.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days. (77-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.7%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days. (51-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.9%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days. (128-78 since 1997.) (62.1%, +42.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days. (77-35 since 1997.) (68.8%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days. (92-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (63%, +32.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days. (56-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.1%, +28.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in July games. (285-174 since 1997.) (62.1%, +93.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in May, June, or July games. (587-395 since 1997.) (59.8%, +152.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - playing with 2 days rest. (202-135 since 1997.) (59.9%, +53.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after a division game. (579-369 since 1997.) (61.1%, +173.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after a division game against opponent after a non-conference game. (223-134 since 1997.) (62.5%, +75.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (316-197 since 1997.) (61.6%, +99.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (46-20 since 1997.) (69.7%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games. (157-98 since 1997.) (61.6%, +49.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (46-20 since 1997.) (69.7%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (46-20 since 1997.) (69.7%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%). (234-149 since 1997.) (61.1%, +70.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (59-26 since 1997.) (69.4%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (51-18 since 1997.) (73.9%, +31.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (53-25 since 1997.) (67.9%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games. (190-114 since 1997.) (62.5%, +64.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (51-18 since 1997.) (73.9%, +31.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (51-18 since 1997.) (73.9%, +31.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (53-25 since 1997.) (67.9%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (53-25 since 1997.) (67.9%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (33-11 since 1997.) (75%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games. (169-107 since 1997.) (61.2%, +51.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (33-11 since 1997.) (75%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (33-11 since 1997.) (75%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in non-conference games. (331-221 since 1997.) (60%, +87.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in non-conference games, after a division game. (208-128 since 1997.) (61.9%, +67.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive unders. (467-311 since 1997.) (60%, +124.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread. (286-205 since 1997.) (58.2%, +60.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games. (282-194 since 1997.) (59.2%, +68.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after a game being outrebounded by opponent by 15 or more. (59-24 since 1997.) (71.1%, +32.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss against a division rival. (283-180 since 1997.) (61.1%, +85 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (56-25 since 1997.) (69.1%, +28.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (40-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (34-13 since 1997.) (72.3%, +19.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (59-28 since 1997.) (67.8%, +28.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more. (359-237 since 1997.) (60.2%, +98.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (146-85 since 1997.) (63.2%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (87-49 since 1997.) (64%, +33.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (69-29 since 1997.) (70.4%, +37.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (32-9 since 1997.) (78%, +22.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (323-221 since 1997.) (59.4%, +79.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts. (405-290 since 1997.) (58.3%, +86 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, in July games. (148-91 since 1997.) (61.9%, +47.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, in May, June, or July games. (235-160 since 1997.) (59.5%, +59 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game. (237-157 since 1997.) (60.2%, +64.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games. (134-86 since 1997.) (60.9%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game. (324-223 since 1997.) (59.2%, +78.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games. (183-125 since 1997.) (59.4%, +45.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (168-112 since 1997.) (60%, +44.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (132-85 since 1997.) (60.8%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season. (400-279 since 1997.) (58.9%, +93.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (225-155 since 1997.) (59.2%, +54.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - averaging 9 or more steals/game on the season, in July games. (97-53 since 1997.) (64.7%, +38.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in July games. (61-34 since 1997.) (64.2%, +23.6 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games. (95-55 since 1997.) (63.3%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after playing a home game. (411-268 since 1997.) (60.5%, +116.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread. (410-278 since 1997.) (59.6%, +104.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive losses. (415-281 since 1997.) (59.6%, +105.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, in July games. (133-77 since 1997.) (63.3%, +48.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, in May, June, or July games. (264-188 since 1997.) (58.4%, +57.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in July games. (470-346 since 1997.) (57.6%, +89.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after a division game against opponent after a non-conference game. (381-269 since 1997.) (58.6%, +85.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (89-52 since 1997.) (63.1%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (89-52 since 1997.) (63.1%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (89-52 since 1997.) (63.1%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%). (346-250 since 1997.) (58.1%, +71 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (73-43 since 1997.) (62.9%, +25.7 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (57-25 since 1997.) (69.5%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games. (260-181 since 1997.) (59%, +60.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (57-25 since 1997.) (69.5%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (57-25 since 1997.) (69.5%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, playing with 2 days rest. (124-72 since 1997.) (63.3%, +44.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - averaging 9 or more steals/game on the season, in July games. (133-82 since 1997.) (61.9%, +42.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, in July games. (229-156 since 1997.) (59.5%, +57.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in July games. (285-174 since 1997.) (62.1%, +93.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in May, June, or July games. (587-395 since 1997.) (59.8%, +152.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a non-conference game. (364-224 since 1997.) (61.9%, +117.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 2 consecutive non-conference games. (165-109 since 1997.) (60.2%, +45.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days. (166-107 since 1997.) (60.8%, +48.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days, in May, June, or July games. (125-75 since 1997.) (62.5%, +42.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (342-240 since 1997.) (58.8%, +78 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, in May, June, or July games. (224-151 since 1997.) (59.7%, +57.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (342-209 since 1997.) (62.1%, +112.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (46-20 since 1997.) (69.7%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (36-14 since 1997.) (72%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games. (157-98 since 1997.) (61.6%, +49.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (46-20 since 1997.) (69.7%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (46-20 since 1997.) (69.7%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%). (230-149 since 1997.) (60.7%, +66.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (84-46 since 1997.) (64.6%, +33.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (33-11 since 1997.) (75%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games. (169-107 since 1997.) (61.2%, +51.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (64-30 since 1997.) (68.1%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better. (29-7 since 1997.) (80.6%, +21.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (33-11 since 1997.) (75%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (33-11 since 1997.) (75%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%). (197-132 since 1997.) (59.9%, +51.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (90-47 since 1997.) (65.7%, +38.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games. (152-94 since 1997.) (61.8%, +48.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (66-32 since 1997.) (67.3%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (122-75 since 1997.) (61.9%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in non-conference games. (331-221 since 1997.) (60%, +87.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in non-conference games, after a non-conference game. (213-130 since 1997.) (62.1%, +70 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after one or more consecutive overs. (384-268 since 1997.) (58.9%, +89.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games. (260-170 since 1997.) (60.5%, +73 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (96-56 since 1997.) (63.2%, +34.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (73-38 since 1997.) (65.8%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread. (309-191 since 1997.) (61.8%, +98.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread. (234-146 since 1997.) (61.6%, +73.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days. (52-25 since 1997.) (67.5%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (295-210 since 1997.) (58.4%, +64 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 75 points or more. (133-79 since 1997.) (62.7%, +46.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more. (332-234 since 1997.) (58.7%, +74.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (323-219 since 1997.) (59.6%, +82.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (203-132 since 1997.) (60.6%, +57.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a combined score of 155 points or more. (231-157 since 1997.) (59.5%, +58.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games. (143-93 since 1997.) (60.6%, +40.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game. (323-219 since 1997.) (59.6%, +82.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games. (186-125 since 1997.) (59.8%, +48.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season. (205-130 since 1997.) (61.2%, +62 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in July games. (81-39 since 1997.) (67.5%, +38.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (121-77 since 1997.) (61.1%, +36.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws. (326-224 since 1997.) (59.3%, +79.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in May, June, or July games. (195-132 since 1997.) (59.6%, +49.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws. (113-64 since 1997.) (63.8%, +42.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after playing a road game. (409-279 since 1997.) (59.4%, +102.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (94-52 since 1997.) (64.4%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - in July games. (470-346 since 1997.) (57.6%, +89.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after a non-conference game. (621-453 since 1997.) (57.8%, +122.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (640-476 since 1997.) (57.3%, +116.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%). (346-250 since 1997.) (58.1%, +71 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (144-82 since 1997.) (63.7%, +53.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (73-43 since 1997.) (62.9%, +25.7 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (57-25 since 1997.) (69.5%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games. (260-181 since 1997.) (59%, +60.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (105-57 since 1997.) (64.8%, +42.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better. (50-22 since 1997.) (69.4%, +25.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (57-25 since 1997.) (69.5%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (57-25 since 1997.) (69.5%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (155-99 since 1997.) (61%, +46.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (61-33 since 1997.) (64.9%, +24.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread. (408-295 since 1997.) (58%, +83.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days. (99-61 since 1997.) (61.9%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where team scored less than 60 points against opponent off an upset loss as a home favorite. (23-3 since 1997.) (88.5%, +19.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where team scored less than 60 points against opponent off a home loss. (26-6 since 1997.) (81.2%, +19.4 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE | 68 | | 35 | | 26-62 | 42.3% | 5-17 | 32.7% | 11-13 | 79.9% | 40 | 7 | 16 | CONNECTICUT | 78 | | 39 | | 30-69 | 43.6% | 6-18 | 33.6% | 12-15 | 75.5% | 43 | 10 | 12 |
| The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT covered the first half line 557 times, while SEATTLE covered the first half line 443 times. No Edge. | In 1000 simulated games, 551 games went over first half total, while 449 games went under first half total. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
SEATTLE is 51-98 against the 1rst half line (-56.8 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 36.3, OPPONENT 41.4 | SEATTLE is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers this season. The average score was SEATTLE 33.1, OPPONENT 41.6 | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the 1rst half line (+7.5 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.3, OPPONENT 37.1 | CONNECTICUT is 19-9 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.0, OPPONENT 35.8 | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.1, OPPONENT 36.1 | CONNECTICUT is 18-6 against the 1rst half line (+11.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.9, OPPONENT 37.2 |
|
SEATTLE is 21-10 OVER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 35.4, OPPONENT 42.1 | CONNECTICUT is 127-66 OVER (+54.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.0, OPPONENT 38.0 | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.3, OPPONENT 40.5 |
|
SEATTLE is 141-86 UNDER (+46.4 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they attempt 57 to 63 shots since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 33.9, OPPONENT 34.4 | SEATTLE is 90-57 UNDER (+27.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 34.6, OPPONENT 35.5 | SEATTLE is 107-47 UNDER (+55.3 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 33.6, OPPONENT 33.8 | SEATTLE is 81-49 UNDER (+27.1 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 34.0, OPPONENT 35.0 | SEATTLE is 86-50 UNDER (+31.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 33.7, OPPONENT 34.4 | SEATTLE is 118-88 UNDER (+21.2 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 7 or less offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 34.3, OPPONENT 35.5 | SEATTLE is 87-40 UNDER (+43.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit 3 to 6 more turnovers than their opponents since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 33.0, OPPONENT 34.5 | SEATTLE is 104-59 UNDER (+39.1 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 33.3 | SEATTLE is 88-57 UNDER (+25.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 35.1, OPPONENT 34.9 | SEATTLE is 70-31 UNDER (+35.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 32.7, OPPONENT 33.9 | SEATTLE is 29-16 UNDER (+11.4 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 35.5 | CONNECTICUT is 21-8 UNDER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.2, OPPONENT 35.5 | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.9, OPPONENT 35.4 | CONNECTICUT is 27-15 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.0, OPPONENT 36.1 | CONNECTICUT is 60-38 UNDER (+18.2 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.9, OPPONENT 35.4 |
|
| | | | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 19-35 against the 1rst half line (-19.5 Units) when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.9, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-24 against the 1rst half line (-17.4 Units) when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.3, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-50 against the 1rst half line (-25.0 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.2, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was SEATTLE 34.8, OPPONENT 44.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 18-35 against the 1rst half line (-20.5 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 35.2, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.7, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.8, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 158-119 UNDER (+27.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 35.0, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 38-20 UNDER (+16.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 92-64 UNDER (+21.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 36.5, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 87-62 UNDER (+18.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 128-91 UNDER (+27.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 35.7, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 174-135 UNDER (+25.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 124-88 UNDER (+27.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 34.3, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 182-127 UNDER (+42.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 34.2, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 166-125 UNDER (+28.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 34.7, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 251-175 UNDER (+58.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 40-20 UNDER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 34.3, OPPONENT 32.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 53-33 UNDER (+16.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 34.3, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 161-108 UNDER (+42.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 156-122 UNDER (+21.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 30-14 UNDER (+14.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 32.8, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 72-45 UNDER (+22.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 33.5, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 103-62 UNDER (+34.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 34.2, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-5 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.1, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-2 UNDER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.7, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-5 UNDER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.4, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-3 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.9, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 112-84 UNDER (+19.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.2, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-8 UNDER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.2, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-10 UNDER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.4, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-13 UNDER (+15.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.5, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-7 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.7, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 41-23 UNDER (+15.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.2, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-10 UNDER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.6, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-13 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.1, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 51-32 UNDER (+15.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.0, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 74-105 against the 1rst half line (-41.5 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.9, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 45-68 against the 1rst half line (-29.8 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.1, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was SEATTLE 33.5, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 4-14 against the 1rst half line (-11.4 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 31.6, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) off a road loss this season. The average score was SEATTLE 32.3, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 31.3, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 4-14 against the 1rst half line (-11.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 33.4, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more this season. The average score was SEATTLE 32.9, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog this season. The average score was SEATTLE 32.0, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) after playing a road game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 32.0, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season. The average score was SEATTLE 32.9, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 3-10 against the 1rst half line (-8.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) after a division game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.4, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-7 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.2, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.2, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.6, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-13 against the 1rst half line (+15.7 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.4, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-9 against the 1rst half line (+13.1 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.3, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-9 against the 1rst half line (+10.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.5, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.7, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.1, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-8 against the 1rst half line (+11.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.4, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.9, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.9, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.4, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.3, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 321-224 UNDER (+74.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 162-113 UNDER (+37.7 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 32.5, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 129-85 UNDER (+35.5 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 32.1, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 167-105 UNDER (+51.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 32.7, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 106-72 UNDER (+26.8 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 34.2, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 93-66 UNDER (+20.4 Units) the 1rst half total in July games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 34.1, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 218-145 UNDER (+58.5 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 34.2, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 61-33 UNDER (+24.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games against Eastern conference opponents since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 31.6, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 111-75 UNDER (+28.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 34.8, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 54-35 UNDER (+15.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive non-conference games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 34.7, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 90-62 UNDER (+21.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 164-114 UNDER (+38.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 35.4, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 164-120 UNDER (+32.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 35.0, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 33.6, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 144-103 UNDER (+30.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 35.3, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 34-18 UNDER (+14.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 33.5, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 61-33 UNDER (+24.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in non-conference games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 31.6, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 162-91 UNDER (+61.9 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 34.8, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 64-40 UNDER (+20.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 35.0, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 104-74 UNDER (+22.6 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 34.3, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 119-74 UNDER (+37.6 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 73-36 UNDER (+33.4 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 34.4, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 83-46 UNDER (+32.4 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 34.8, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 41-18 UNDER (+21.2 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 34.4, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where team scored less than 60 points over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 32.8, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 17-4 UNDER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 32.2, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 31.3, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 103-71 UNDER (+24.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 36.6, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 25-13 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 34.4, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 69-45 UNDER (+19.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 34.0, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 110-77 UNDER (+25.3 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 35.6, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 83-53 UNDER (+24.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 39-24 UNDER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 34.1, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 93-56 UNDER (+31.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 32.1, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 58-36 UNDER (+18.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 31.5, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 20-6 UNDER (+13.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 32.5, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 20-6 UNDER (+13.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 32.5, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 30-13 UNDER (+15.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 34.4, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 35-15 UNDER (+18.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 34.2, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total on Friday over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.3, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.8, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 53-33 UNDER (+16.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.4, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 5-14 | -7.6 | 10-9 | 11-8 | 69.9 | 34.5 | 42.9% | 36.4 | 76.8 | 40.4 | 43.9% | 41.8 | Road Games | 1-9 | -7 | 4-6 | 5-5 | 65.5 | 30.9 | 39.6% | 35.1 | 78.1 | 41.3 | 44.8% | 43.9 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +0.5 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 73.0 | 38.4 | 44.4% | 37.0 | 74.4 | 40.8 | 44.7% | 41.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.9 | 34.5 | 26-61 | 42.9% | 5-16 | 32.9% | 12-15 | 80.3% | 36 | 5 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 74.7 | 36.7 | 27-65 | 42.1% | 5-15 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 79.4% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 65.5 | 30.9 | 24-62 | 39.6% | 6-17 | 32.0% | 11-13 | 84.7% | 35 | 4 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.8 | 40.4 | 29-65 | 43.9% | 5-17 | 32.6% | 14-18 | 78.0% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 75.4 | 37.6 | 28-66 | 42.1% | 5-15 | 33.5% | 15-19 | 79.7% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.1 | 41.3 | 29-65 | 44.8% | 6-17 | 32.6% | 14-18 | 78.7% | 44 | 9 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 8-8 | +6.9 | 10-6 | 9-7 | 76.2 | 36.9 | 41.6% | 41.5 | 75.4 | 38.2 | 42.7% | 43.7 | Home Games | 3-5 | -2.4 | 5-3 | 4-4 | 75.9 | 38.0 | 42.5% | 40.9 | 75.9 | 40.1 | 43.5% | 41.4 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -1.4 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 73.8 | 36.6 | 40.6% | 42.6 | 78.0 | 36.6 | 42.3% | 45.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.2 | 36.9 | 29-70 | 41.6% | 6-18 | 33.9% | 12-16 | 75.8% | 41 | 9 | 15 | 20 | 10 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 76 | 37.9 | 28-66 | 42.2% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 79.1% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 75.9 | 38.0 | 29-68 | 42.5% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 12-15 | 77.2% | 41 | 9 | 15 | 18 | 9 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.4 | 38.2 | 28-65 | 42.7% | 5-14 | 32.3% | 15-19 | 82.2% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 16 | 7 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 76.7 | 38.4 | 28-66 | 43.3% | 5-14 | 32.9% | 15-19 | 80.2% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.9 | 40.1 | 29-66 | 43.5% | 4-13 | 31.8% | 14-16 | 86.9% | 41 | 10 | 14 | 15 | 8 | 16 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: SEATTLE 70.8, CONNECTICUT 70.8 |
| | |
|
|
6/21/2015 | PHOENIX | 72-84 | 36-44 | 1.5 | L | 70.5 | O | 28-60 | 46.7% | 43 | 15 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 36 | 8 | 6/25/2015 | MINNESOTA | 73-76 | 51-42 | 6 | W | 72 | O | 28-62 | 45.2% | 36 | 17 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 40 | 14 | 6/27/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 71-73 | 40-38 | 3 | W | 71 | O | 29-65 | 44.6% | 34 | 14 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 45 | 15 | 6/28/2015 | @ TULSA | 89-93 | 42-45 | 7 | W | 74 | O | 35-69 | 50.7% | 30 | 9 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 43 | 13 | 6/30/2015 | TULSA | 74-69 | 32-40 | 1.5 | L | 74 | U | 29-62 | 46.8% | 42 | 9 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 43 | 10 | 7/3/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 57-82 | 33-34 | 7.5 | W | 73 | U | 24-62 | 38.7% | 28 | 12 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 42 | 13 | 7/5/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 64-72 | 27-36 | 3.5 | L | 72.5 | U | 23-59 | 39.0% | 36 | 14 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 49 | 12 | 7/8/2015 | @ INDIANA | 65-88 | 35-53 | 3.5 | L | 73.5 | O | 19-45 | 42.2% | 36 | 19 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 32 | 11 | 7/10/2015 | PHOENIX | 79-94 | 34-46 | 4.5 | L | 72.5 | O | 26-57 | 45.6% | 32 | 15 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 39 | 10 | 7/12/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 60-70 | 27-41 | 8.5 | L | 74 | U | 24-63 | 38.1% | 37 | 12 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 44 | 13 | 7/15/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 68-61 | 35-37 | 1.5 | L | 72.5 | U | 25-64 | 39.1% | 31 | 11 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 41 | 21 | 7/18/2015 | ATLANTA | 86-73 | 48-33 | 1.5 | W | 72.5 | O | 33-58 | 56.9% | 40 | 16 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 39 | 19 | 7/21/2015 | NEW YORK | 77-81 | 45-40 | 2.5 | W | 71.5 | O | 30-62 | 48.4% | 36 | 14 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 39 | 10 | 7/29/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 74-87 | 37-53 | 5 | L | 71 | O | 30-73 | 41.1% | 41 | 7 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 42 | 5 | 7/31/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2015 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2015 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2015 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/21/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 76-68 | 30-40 | -2 | L | 67 | O | 28-65 | 43.1% | 40 | 8 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 37 | 16 | 6/26/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 80-76 | 26-32 | -3.5 | L | 70 | U | 26-75 | 34.7% | 50 | 12 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 44 | 19 | 6/30/2015 | INDIANA | 84-92 | 44-49 | -2.5 | L | 74.5 | O | 33-66 | 50.0% | 31 | 10 | 31-56 | 55.4% | 36 | 19 | 7/2/2015 | CHICAGO | 74-77 | 42-38 | 2 | W | 75.5 | O | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 14 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 36 | 15 | 7/12/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 76-96 | 41-49 | 4.5 | L | 77.5 | O | 28-62 | 45.2% | 30 | 9 | 38-67 | 56.7% | 41 | 10 | 7/14/2015 | MINNESOTA | 79-85 | 40-42 | 3.5 | W | 72 | O | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 14 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 34 | 15 | 7/16/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 57-64 | 33-28 | 3 | W | 72.5 | U | 21-70 | 30.0% | 47 | 15 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 53 | 13 | 7/19/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 82-89 | 41-39 | 3.5 | W | 70.5 | O | 32-74 | 43.2% | 47 | 15 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 38 | 12 | 7/22/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 78-77 | 35-32 | 4.5 | W | 72.5 | U | 30-72 | 41.7% | 42 | 15 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 50 | 16 | 7/28/2015 | INDIANA | 73-75 | 34-42 | -0.5 | L | 75 | O | 28-65 | 43.1% | 37 | 18 | 33-81 | 40.7% | 52 | 13 | 7/31/2015 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2015 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2015 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CONNECTICUT is 16-14 versus the first half line when playing against SEATTLE since 1997 | 15 of 29 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 3-2 versus the first half line when playing against SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons | 3 of 5 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CONNECTICUT is 9-6 versus the first half line when playing against SEATTLE since 1997 | 8 of 15 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 1-1 versus the first half line when playing against SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons | 1 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/16/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 79 | 140.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 39 | 9 | 12 | | SEATTLE | 58 | -2.5 | Under | 30 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 36 | 4 | 22 | 7/15/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 86 | 142 | SU ATS | 39 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 11-17 | 64.7% | 49 | 11 | 9 | | SEATTLE | 63 | -3.5 | Over | 30 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 32 | 6 | 8 | 5/23/2014 | SEATTLE | 59 | 142.5 | Under | 27 | 19-51 | 37.3% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 30 | 3 | 14 | | CONNECTICUT | 71 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 33 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 1-8 | 12.5% | 10-15 | 66.7% | 47 | 11 | 11 |
|
| | |
|
Anne is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.4, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 14-30 against the 1rst half line (-19.0 Units) as a home favorite of 3.5 to 5 points vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 35.5, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 33-53 against the 1rst half line (-25.3 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 37.0, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 25-44 against the 1rst half line (-23.4 Units) in home games after playing a game as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 36.7, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 6-16 against the 1rst half line (-11.6 Units) in home games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 35.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Jenny is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 32.0, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Jenny is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 32.0, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 55-36 against the 1rst half line (+15.4 Units) when playing with 2 days rest in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 34.8, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 156-115 against the 1rst half line (+29.5 Units) after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 35.1, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 124-94 against the 1rst half line (+20.6 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 35.4, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 28-17 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.1, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 86-52 against the 1rst half line (+28.8 Units) off a loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 36.4, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 22-12 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.0, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 116-83 against the 1rst half line (+24.7 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 36.3, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 128-81 against the 1rst half line (+38.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 35.8, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.7, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Jenny is 38-20 OVER (+16.0 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Jenny 36.7, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Jenny is 14-4 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a home loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Jenny 37.7, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Jenny is 29-15 OVER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Jenny 37.4, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 19-10 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games in May, June, or July games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.7, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 24-11 OVER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 38.0, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.3, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Anne is 239-183 UNDER (+37.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 34.8, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 118-83 UNDER (+26.7 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 35.8, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 31-15 UNDER (+14.5 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3.5 to 5 points vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 35.5, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 16-4 UNDER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total on Friday as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.8, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Anne is 154-114 UNDER (+28.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 35.1, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.4, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 86-54 UNDER (+26.6 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 34.1, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 23-6 UNDER (+16.4 Units) the 1rst half total off a close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 33.0, OPPONENT 31.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Anne is 29-12 UNDER (+15.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a close loss by 3 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 33.5, OPPONENT 32.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 91-64 UNDER (+20.6 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 35.3, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 24-13 UNDER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.7, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 15-5 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.1, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 46-19 UNDER (+25.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 34.5, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 29-13 UNDER (+14.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 34.1, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 13-2 UNDER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.7, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Anne is 17-5 UNDER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.4, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 14-3 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.9, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Anne is 18-9 UNDER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.5, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 22-8 UNDER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.2, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 97-68 UNDER (+22.2 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 35.3, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 24-10 UNDER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.4, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 30-19 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.6, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 30-13 UNDER (+15.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.5, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 38-26 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.9, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 18-7 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.7, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 32-11 UNDER (+19.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 37 or less rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 32.3, OPPONENT 30.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 40-15 UNDER (+23.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 37 or less rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 31.9, OPPONENT 30.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 25-13 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.1, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 90-65 UNDER (+18.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 36.8, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 36-19 UNDER (+15.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 35.0, OPPONENT 32.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 57-28 UNDER (+26.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 35.1, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 28-12 UNDER (+14.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 35.5, OPPONENT 31.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 60-37 UNDER (+19.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 33.0, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 81-53 UNDER (+22.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 33.8, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 126 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 121 times. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 15 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 9 times. |
|
|
| |
|
Since 1997, 58 games went under the first half total, while 41 games went over the first half total. | Over the last 3 seasons, 9 games went over the first half total, while 7 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 16 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 14 times. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 2 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 1 times. | Since 1997, 19 games went under the first half total, while 10 games went over the first half total. | Over the last 3 seasons, 2 games went under the first half total, while 1 games went over the first half total. |
|
| | |
[G] 07/16/2015 - Monica Wright out indefinitely ( Knee ) | |
[G] 06/05/2015 - Allison Hightower out for season ( Suspension ) | [F] 06/05/2015 - Kelsey Griffin out for season ( Hip ) | [F] 06/04/2015 - Chiney Ogwumike out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/1/2024 1:35:21 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|