WNBA SANANTONIO Matchup 20150731

You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.

WNBA : First Half Matchup

Friday 7/31/2015

Line

$ Line

OU Line

Score

WASHINGTON
First Half Results
SAN ANTONIO

-1

73.5

49
Final
27

WASHINGTON (10 - 6) at SAN ANTONIO (6 - 12)

Friday, 7/31/2015 8:05 PM

Board		First Half
603	WASHINGTON	-1
604	SAN ANTONIO	73.5

	Current First Half FoxSheets
	ATS FoxSheet
	First Half FoxSheet
	Money Line FoxSheet
	Teaser Line FoxSheet

KEY GAME INFORMATION

STATFOX SUPER SITUATIONS™

StatFox Super Situations favoring SAN ANTONIO to cover the first half line

There are 2 situations with a total rating of 5 stars.

- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(39-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.9%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*)

- Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(37-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.5%, +23.8 units. Rating = 3*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line

There are 5 situations with a total rating of 11 stars.

- Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(154-102 since 1997.) (60.2%, +41.8 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(140-84 since 1997.) (62.5%, +47.6 units. Rating = 2*)

- Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - after scoring 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(51-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.8%, +27.9 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(34-12 since 1997.) (73.9%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(132-83 since 1997.) (61.4%, +40.7 units. Rating = 2*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring the game to go UNDER the first half total

There are 294 situations with a total rating of 675 stars.

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games.
(169-107 since 1997.) (61.2%, +51.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(33-11 since 1997.) (75%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(33-11 since 1997.) (75%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(316-192 since 1997.) (62.2%, +104.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(238-134 since 1997.) (64%, +90.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in non-conference games.
(331-221 since 1997.) (60%, +87.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in non-conference games, off a home win.
(118-61 since 1997.) (65.9%, +50.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after one or more consecutive overs.
(395-259 since 1997.) (60.4%, +110.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games.
(296-187 since 1997.) (61.3%, +90.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games.
(208-133 since 1997.) (61%, +61.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(224-150 since 1997.) (59.9%, +59 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - with a losing record.
(309-206 since 1997.) (60%, +82.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - with a losing record, in July games.
(116-68 since 1997.) (63%, +41.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - with a losing record, in May, June, or July games.
(183-124 since 1997.) (59.6%, +46.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(209-129 since 1997.) (61.8%, +67.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(142-86 since 1997.) (62.3%, +47.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(89-46 since 1997.) (65.9%, +38.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record.
(76-36 since 1997.) (67.9%, +36.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record, in July games.
(31-9 since 1997.) (77.5%, +21.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(52-18 since 1997.) (74.3%, +32.2 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - off a home win.
(272-164 since 1997.) (62.4%, +91.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - off a home win, in May, June, or July games.
(176-106 since 1997.) (62.4%, +59.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - off a home win, with a losing record.
(68-33 since 1997.) (67.3%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins.
(74-33 since 1997.) (69.2%, +37.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 75 points or more.
(359-237 since 1997.) (60.2%, +98.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after a win by 10 points or more.
(107-54 since 1997.) (66.5%, +47.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(146-85 since 1997.) (63.2%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(87-49 since 1997.) (64%, +33.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(172-101 since 1997.) (63%, +60.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(105-57 since 1997.) (64.8%, +42.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after playing 2 consecutive home games.
(166-98 since 1997.) (62.9%, +58.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(453-293 since 1997.) (60.7%, +130.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a losing record.
(146-91 since 1997.) (61.6%, +45.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where they covered the spread, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(71-35 since 1997.) (67%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(202-134 since 1997.) (60.1%, +54.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(448-290 since 1997.) (60.7%, +129 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(152-97 since 1997.) (61%, +45.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(297-182 since 1997.) (62%, +96.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a losing record.
(109-69 since 1997.) (61.2%, +33.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins against opponent after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(123-75 since 1997.) (62.1%, +40.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(234-143 since 1997.) (62.1%, +76.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(155-90 since 1997.) (63.3%, +56 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in July games.
(470-346 since 1997.) (57.6%, +89.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%).
(346-250 since 1997.) (58.1%, +71 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(111-65 since 1997.) (63.1%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(73-43 since 1997.) (62.9%, +25.7 units. Rating = 1*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(57-25 since 1997.) (69.5%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games.
(260-181 since 1997.) (59%, +60.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(111-65 since 1997.) (63.1%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(111-65 since 1997.) (63.1%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(57-25 since 1997.) (69.5%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(57-25 since 1997.) (69.5%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(464-321 since 1997.) (59.1%, +110.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(349-227 since 1997.) (60.6%, +99.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season.
(180-118 since 1997.) (60.4%, +50.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(234-162 since 1997.) (59.1%, +55.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where they covered the spread against opponent after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games.
(50-20 since 1997.) (71.4%, +28 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games against opponent after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games.
(47-19 since 1997.) (71.2%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games against opponent after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games.
(29-8 since 1997.) (78.4%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(405-291 since 1997.) (58.2%, +84.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(260-183 since 1997.) (58.7%, +58.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in July games.
(285-174 since 1997.) (62.1%, +93.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in May, June, or July games.
(587-395 since 1997.) (59.8%, +152.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a non-conference game.
(364-224 since 1997.) (61.9%, +117.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 2 consecutive non-conference games.
(165-109 since 1997.) (60.2%, +45.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(166-107 since 1997.) (60.8%, +48.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days, in May, June, or July games.
(125-75 since 1997.) (62.5%, +42.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(342-240 since 1997.) (58.8%, +78 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, in May, June, or July games.
(224-151 since 1997.) (59.7%, +57.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(342-209 since 1997.) (62.1%, +112.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better.
(97-54 since 1997.) (64.2%, +37.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%).
(230-149 since 1997.) (60.7%, +66.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(103-57 since 1997.) (64.4%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(87-47 since 1997.) (64.9%, +35.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(87-47 since 1997.) (64.9%, +35.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(87-47 since 1997.) (64.9%, +35.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(84-46 since 1997.) (64.6%, +33.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(33-11 since 1997.) (75%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games.
(169-107 since 1997.) (61.2%, +51.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(64-30 since 1997.) (68.1%, +31 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better.
(29-7 since 1997.) (80.6%, +21.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(33-11 since 1997.) (75%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(33-11 since 1997.) (75%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(316-192 since 1997.) (62.2%, +104.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(238-134 since 1997.) (64%, +90.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in non-conference games.
(331-221 since 1997.) (60%, +87.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in non-conference games, after a non-conference game.
(213-130 since 1997.) (62.1%, +70 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in non-conference games, off a home win.
(84-47 since 1997.) (64.1%, +32.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after one or more consecutive overs.
(384-268 since 1997.) (58.9%, +89.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(234-146 since 1997.) (61.6%, +73.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(52-25 since 1997.) (67.5%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(164-96 since 1997.) (63.1%, +58.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(107-63 since 1997.) (62.9%, +37.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(68-33 since 1997.) (67.3%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(45-18 since 1997.) (71.4%, +25.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(92-45 since 1997.) (67.2%, +42.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(44-9 since 1997.) (83%, +34.1 units. Rating = 5*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(27-6 since 1997.) (81.8%, +20.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(264-170 since 1997.) (60.8%, +77 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning record on the season.
(227-139 since 1997.) (62%, +74.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(154-89 since 1997.) (63.4%, +56.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(91-54 since 1997.) (62.8%, +31.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(122-74 since 1997.) (62.2%, +40.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(54-18 since 1997.) (75%, +34.2 units. Rating = 4*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(31-9 since 1997.) (77.5%, +21.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(24-6 since 1997.) (80%, +17.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season.
(415-245 since 1997.) (62.9%, +145.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season, in July games.
(148-64 since 1997.) (69.8%, +77.6 units. Rating = 4*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(239-128 since 1997.) (65.1%, +98.2 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(283-163 since 1997.) (63.5%, +103.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games, in July games.
(103-46 since 1997.) (69.1%, +52.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games.
(107-46 since 1997.) (69.9%, +56.4 units. Rating = 4*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(166-94 since 1997.) (63.8%, +62.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team, in July games.
(63-26 since 1997.) (70.8%, +34.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team, in May, June, or July games.
(100-54 since 1997.) (64.9%, +40.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(114-59 since 1997.) (65.9%, +49.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games, in July games.
(47-19 since 1997.) (71.2%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games.
(48-19 since 1997.) (71.6%, +27.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(190-120 since 1997.) (61.3%, +58 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season, in July games.
(70-33 since 1997.) (68%, +33.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(116-61 since 1997.) (65.5%, +48.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games.
(51-23 since 1997.) (68.9%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(86-40 since 1997.) (68.3%, +42 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record, in July games.
(36-13 since 1997.) (73.5%, +21.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record, in May, June, or July games.
(57-23 since 1997.) (71.2%, +31.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(57-26 since 1997.) (68.7%, +28.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a bad team (25% to 40%).
(38-12 since 1997.) (76%, +24.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off a home win by 10 points or more.
(165-89 since 1997.) (65%, +67.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off a home win by 10 points or more, in July games.
(56-19 since 1997.) (74.7%, +35.1 units. Rating = 4*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off a home win by 10 points or more, in May, June, or July games.
(107-54 since 1997.) (66.5%, +47.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off a home win by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season.
(96-46 since 1997.) (67.6%, +45.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off a home win by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(63-29 since 1997.) (68.5%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off a home win by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(39-14 since 1997.) (73.6%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off a home win by 10 points or more against opponent off a home win.
(53-24 since 1997.) (68.8%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off a home win.
(303-176 since 1997.) (63.3%, +109.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off a home win, in July games.
(98-47 since 1997.) (67.6%, +46.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off a home win, in May, June, or July games.
(193-110 since 1997.) (63.7%, +72 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off a home win, with a winning record on the season.
(181-100 since 1997.) (64.4%, +71 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off a home win, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(117-69 since 1997.) (62.9%, +41.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off a home win, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(40-14 since 1997.) (74.1%, +24.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a win by 10 points or more.
(241-127 since 1997.) (65.5%, +101.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(83-41 since 1997.) (66.9%, +37.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(45-20 since 1997.) (69.2%, +23 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(50-18 since 1997.) (73.5%, +30.2 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(94-45 since 1997.) (67.6%, +44.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(44-16 since 1997.) (73.3%, +26.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(22-4 since 1997.) (84.6%, +17.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(66-27 since 1997.) (71%, +36.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(323-219 since 1997.) (59.6%, +82.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(203-132 since 1997.) (60.6%, +57.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 75 points or more.
(371-238 since 1997.) (60.9%, +109.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(76-39 since 1997.) (66.1%, +33.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(108-60 since 1997.) (64.3%, +42 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 80 points or more.
(220-132 since 1997.) (62.5%, +74.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 80 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(72-32 since 1997.) (69.2%, +36.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(231-157 since 1997.) (59.5%, +58.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts.
(418-292 since 1997.) (58.9%, +96.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, in May, June, or July games.
(235-160 since 1997.) (59.5%, +59 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in July games.
(285-174 since 1997.) (62.1%, +93.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in May, June, or July games.
(587-395 since 1997.) (59.8%, +152.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(122-77 since 1997.) (61.3%, +37.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(33-11 since 1997.) (75%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(103-57 since 1997.) (64.4%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(71-33 since 1997.) (68.3%, +34.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(75-35 since 1997.) (68.2%, +36.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(323-221 since 1997.) (59.4%, +79.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(142-79 since 1997.) (64.3%, +55.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(55-24 since 1997.) (69.6%, +28.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - poor 3 point shooting team - making <=30% of their attempts.
(127-75 since 1997.) (62.9%, +44.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws.
(334-215 since 1997.) (60.8%, +97.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in May, June, or July games.
(197-122 since 1997.) (61.8%, +62.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season.
(72-34 since 1997.) (67.9%, +34.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(132-85 since 1997.) (60.8%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(164-106 since 1997.) (60.7%, +47.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(104-57 since 1997.) (64.6%, +41.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - averaging 7 or less steals/game on the season.
(142-94 since 1997.) (60.2%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - averaging 7 or less steals/game on the season, in July games.
(60-32 since 1997.) (65.2%, +24.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in July games.
(61-34 since 1997.) (64.2%, +23.6 units. Rating = 1*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games.
(95-55 since 1997.) (63.3%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after playing a home game.
(411-268 since 1997.) (60.5%, +116.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(57-25 since 1997.) (69.5%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(464-321 since 1997.) (59.1%, +110.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(349-227 since 1997.) (60.6%, +99.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(408-295 since 1997.) (58%, +83.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(99-61 since 1997.) (61.9%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(272-182 since 1997.) (59.9%, +71.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(112-68 since 1997.) (62.2%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(144-84 since 1997.) (63.2%, +51.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(64-27 since 1997.) (70.3%, +34.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(96-56 since 1997.) (63.2%, +34.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(34-10 since 1997.) (77.3%, +23 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(51-23 since 1997.) (68.9%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season.
(705-522 since 1997.) (57.5%, +130.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season, in July games.
(231-136 since 1997.) (62.9%, +81.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(399-273 since 1997.) (59.4%, +98.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(471-346 since 1997.) (57.6%, +90.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games, in July games.
(158-95 since 1997.) (62.5%, +53.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games.
(165-97 since 1997.) (63%, +58.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season, in July games.
(116-72 since 1997.) (61.7%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a win by 10 points or more.
(407-284 since 1997.) (58.9%, +94.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after a win by 10 points or more.
(275-193 since 1997.) (58.8%, +62.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(770-565 since 1997.) (57.7%, +148.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(191-124 since 1997.) (60.6%, +54.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(390-260 since 1997.) (60%, +104 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(258-161 since 1997.) (61.6%, +80.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(159-102 since 1997.) (60.9%, +46.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread against opponent after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(182-121 since 1997.) (60.1%, +48.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season.
(229-139 since 1997.) (62.2%, +76.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(148-87 since 1997.) (63%, +52.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(49-21 since 1997.) (70%, +25.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games.
(194-129 since 1997.) (60.1%, +52.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season.
(118-70 since 1997.) (62.8%, +41 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(814-585 since 1997.) (58.2%, +170.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(255-163 since 1997.) (61%, +75.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(521-378 since 1997.) (58%, +105.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(467-322 since 1997.) (59.2%, +112.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(303-205 since 1997.) (59.6%, +77.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins against opponent after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(212-139 since 1997.) (60.4%, +59.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(330-230 since 1997.) (58.9%, +77 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 3 or more consecutive wins.
(261-177 since 1997.) (59.6%, +66.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(162-103 since 1997.) (61.1%, +48.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(214-142 since 1997.) (60.1%, +57.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games.
(143-93 since 1997.) (60.6%, +40.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game.
(323-219 since 1997.) (59.6%, +82.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games.
(186-125 since 1997.) (59.8%, +48.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season.
(205-130 since 1997.) (61.2%, +62 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in July games.
(81-39 since 1997.) (67.5%, +38.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(121-77 since 1997.) (61.1%, +36.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season.
(442-321 since 1997.) (57.9%, +88.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(173-111 since 1997.) (60.9%, +50.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better.
(60-29 since 1997.) (67.4%, +28.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws.
(326-224 since 1997.) (59.3%, +79.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in May, June, or July games.
(195-132 since 1997.) (59.6%, +49.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season.
(412-283 since 1997.) (59.3%, +100.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(142-86 since 1997.) (62.3%, +47.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(234-153 since 1997.) (60.5%, +65.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after a win by 10 points or more.
(138-69 since 1997.) (66.7%, +62.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more.
(229-147 since 1997.) (60.9%, +67.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 80 points or more.
(147-87 since 1997.) (62.8%, +51.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more.
(179-118 since 1997.) (60.3%, +49.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after playing a home game.
(445-290 since 1997.) (60.5%, +126 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(453-265 since 1997.) (63.1%, +161.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(99-57 since 1997.) (63.5%, +36.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(164-110 since 1997.) (59.9%, +43 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(175-117 since 1997.) (59.9%, +46.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(232-122 since 1997.) (65.5%, +97.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(151-75 since 1997.) (66.8%, +68.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(89-42 since 1997.) (67.9%, +42.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(62-26 since 1997.) (70.5%, +33.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(48-20 since 1997.) (70.6%, +26 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread against opponent after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(100-56 since 1997.) (64.1%, +38.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(221-141 since 1997.) (61%, +65.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season.
(139-76 since 1997.) (64.7%, +55.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(86-45 since 1997.) (65.6%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(58-27 since 1997.) (68.2%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(476-275 since 1997.) (63.4%, +173.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(160-81 since 1997.) (66.4%, +70.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(310-185 since 1997.) (62.6%, +106.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(278-150 since 1997.) (65%, +113 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(182-94 since 1997.) (65.9%, +78.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(109-58 since 1997.) (65.3%, +45.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(73-37 since 1997.) (66.4%, +32.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(129-76 since 1997.) (62.9%, +45.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(59-23 since 1997.) (72%, +33.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins against opponent after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(129-65 since 1997.) (66.5%, +57.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(258-159 since 1997.) (61.9%, +83.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(85-48 since 1997.) (63.9%, +32.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(160-107 since 1997.) (59.9%, +42.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(195-108 since 1997.) (64.4%, +76.2 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(124-66 since 1997.) (65.3%, +51.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(78-39 since 1997.) (66.7%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(93-53 since 1997.) (63.7%, +34.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(43-16 since 1997.) (72.9%, +25.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 3 or more consecutive wins.
(148-83 since 1997.) (64.1%, +56.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(92-55 since 1997.) (62.6%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(124-67 since 1997.) (64.9%, +50.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(78-40 since 1997.) (66.1%, +34 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 4 or more consecutive wins.
(96-51 since 1997.) (65.3%, +39.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(86-46 since 1997.) (65.2%, +35.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in July games.
(470-346 since 1997.) (57.6%, +89.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a non-conference game.
(621-453 since 1997.) (57.8%, +122.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(640-476 since 1997.) (57.3%, +116.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%).
(100-54 since 1997.) (64.9%, +40.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%).
(346-250 since 1997.) (58.1%, +71 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(144-82 since 1997.) (63.7%, +53.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(111-65 since 1997.) (63.1%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(73-43 since 1997.) (62.9%, +25.7 units. Rating = 1*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(57-25 since 1997.) (69.5%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games.
(260-181 since 1997.) (59%, +60.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(105-57 since 1997.) (64.8%, +42.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better.
(50-22 since 1997.) (69.4%, +25.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(111-65 since 1997.) (63.1%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(111-65 since 1997.) (63.1%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(57-25 since 1997.) (69.5%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*)

STATFOX GAME ESTIMATOR™

	Projection				Shooting		3pt Shots		Free Throws		Rebounding
Teams	Score	Edge	Half	Edge	FGM-A	Pct.	FGM-A	Pct.	FTM-A	Pct.	Tot.	OFF	TO
WASHINGTON	74		37		28-67	42.1%	6-18	32.6%	11-14	78.4%	42	10	11
SAN ANTONIO	71		36		27-66	41.1%	4-13	27.8%	13-16	78.3%	45	12	13

The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total.

In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON covered the first half line 501 times, while SAN ANTONIO covered the first half line 461 times.
No Edge.

In 1000 simulated games, 527 games went under first half total, while 473 games went over first half total.
No Edge.

Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line

WASHINGTON is 58-38 against the 1rst half line (+16.2 Units) when their opponents make 22% to 28% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.5, OPPONENT 34.5

WASHINGTON is 7-0 against the 1rst half line (+7.0 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.8, OPPONENT 34.9

WASHINGTON is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) in road games when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.6, OPPONENT 35.2

SAN ANTONIO is 46-68 against the 1rst half line (-28.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.4, OPPONENT 37.3

SAN ANTONIO is 27-47 against the 1rst half line (-24.7 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.6, OPPONENT 36.2

SAN ANTONIO is 17-33 against the 1rst half line (-19.3 Units) in home games when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.5, OPPONENT 38.8

SAN ANTONIO is 17-32 against the 1rst half line (-18.2 Units) in home games when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.3, OPPONENT 37.7

SAN ANTONIO is 0-8 against the 1rst half line (-8.8 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.9, OPPONENT 39.7

SAN ANTONIO is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) when they score 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.4, OPPONENT 37.9

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring SAN ANTONIO to cover the first half line

WASHINGTON is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.2, OPPONENT 37.6

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring the OVER against the first half total

WASHINGTON is 7-0 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 42.9, OPPONENT 40.1

SAN ANTONIO is 113-82 OVER (+22.8 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.8, OPPONENT 39.4

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring the UNDER against the first half total

WASHINGTON is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 34.9

WASHINGTON is 98-63 UNDER (+28.7 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 35.3

WASHINGTON is 72-47 UNDER (+20.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.4

WASHINGTON is 60-37 UNDER (+19.3 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 22% to 28% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.5, OPPONENT 34.5

WASHINGTON is 14-4 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.6, OPPONENT 35.7

WASHINGTON is 116-70 UNDER (+39.0 Units) the 1rst half total in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.1, OPPONENT 35.0

WASHINGTON is 175-130 UNDER (+32.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 35.8

WASHINGTON is 63-31 UNDER (+28.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.6, OPPONENT 33.3

WASHINGTON is 29-12 UNDER (+15.8 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.6, OPPONENT 35.4

WASHINGTON is 130-88 UNDER (+33.2 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 34.9

SAN ANTONIO is 19-6 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.8, OPPONENT 36.7

SAN ANTONIO is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.0, OPPONENT 36.4

SAN ANTONIO is 54-30 UNDER (+21.0 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.2, OPPONENT 36.3

SAN ANTONIO is 31-14 UNDER (+15.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.9, OPPONENT 38.2

SAN ANTONIO is 98-68 UNDER (+23.2 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 36.8

SAN ANTONIO is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.4, OPPONENT 37.9

SAN ANTONIO is 132-73 UNDER (+51.7 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.9, OPPONENT 35.8

STATFOX POWERLINE™

	Power Rating
	Estimate	Edge
WASHINGTON
SAN ANTONIO	-1.5

STATFOX MATCHUP POWER TRENDS™

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line

There are 7 trends with a total rating of 6 stars.

WASHINGTON is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.9, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 16-5 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.4, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 16-5 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.4, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 27-13 against the 1rst half line (+12.7 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.3, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 15-5 against the 1rst half line (+9.5 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.3, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.9, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.8, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring SAN ANTONIO to cover the first half line

There are 6 trends with a total rating of 6 stars.

SAN ANTONIO is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 42.6, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 39.9, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.4, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 11-2 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.9, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 2*)

SAN ANTONIO is 15-5 against the 1rst half line (+9.5 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 39.0, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 11-2 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 39.0, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 2*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring the OVER against the first half total

There are 3 trends with a total rating of 1 stars.

WASHINGTON is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.8, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.2, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.7, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring the UNDER against the first half total

There are 26 trends with a total rating of 16 stars.

WASHINGTON is 30-16 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.0, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 18-8 UNDER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.0, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 60-35 UNDER (+21.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.4, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 111-79 UNDER (+24.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.7, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 165-118 UNDER (+35.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.0, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 125-87 UNDER (+29.3 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.1, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 22-9 UNDER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.0, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 32-19 UNDER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.1, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 182-125 UNDER (+44.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.1, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 269-187 UNDER (+63.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 51-29 UNDER (+19.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 69-43 UNDER (+21.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 98-70 UNDER (+21.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.9, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 150-106 UNDER (+33.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.3, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 42-24 UNDER (+15.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.1, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 69-44 UNDER (+20.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.5, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 140-106 UNDER (+23.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.6, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.4, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 118-72 UNDER (+38.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 72-50 UNDER (+17.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.9, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 87-55 UNDER (+26.5 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 131-88 UNDER (+34.2 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 134-94 UNDER (+30.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.0, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 198-156 UNDER (+26.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 84-60 UNDER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 21-9 UNDER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.6, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*)

STATFOX SITUATIONAL POWER TRENDS™

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line

There are 23 trends with a total rating of 10 stars.

WASHINGTON is 28-15 against the 1rst half line (+11.5 Units) versus the 1rst half line in road games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.4, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 62-40 against the 1rst half line (+18.0 Units) in a road game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.5, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 28-15 against the 1rst half line (+11.5 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.4, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 18-7 against the 1rst half line (+10.3 Units) on Friday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.0, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 28-14 against the 1rst half line (+12.6 Units) after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.0, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 5-12 against the 1rst half line (-8.2 Units) versus the first half line in all games this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.6, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 29-47 against the 1rst half line (-22.7 Units) in a home game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.4, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 5-12 against the 1rst half line (-8.2 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.6, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 29-49 against the 1rst half line (-24.9 Units) in home games against Eastern conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.3, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 99-135 against the 1rst half line (-49.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.7, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 47-69 against the 1rst half line (-28.9 Units) in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 8-19 against the 1rst half line (-12.9 Units) in home games hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 7-21 against the 1rst half line (-16.1 Units) in home games hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 29-49 against the 1rst half line (-24.9 Units) in home games in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.3, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 9-22 against the 1rst half line (-15.2 Units) after 2 straight games where opponent was called for 22 or more fouls since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.1, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 7-18 against the 1rst half line (-12.8 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home wins since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.3, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 27-48 against the 1rst half line (-25.8 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.0, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 18-35 against the 1rst half line (-20.5 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.9, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 38-64 against the 1rst half line (-32.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 6-18 against the 1rst half line (-13.8 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.4, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 17-34 against the 1rst half line (-20.4 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 12-27 against the 1rst half line (-17.7 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.9, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 31-50 against the 1rst half line (-24.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring SAN ANTONIO to cover the first half line

There are 4 trends with a total rating of 4 stars.

WASHINGTON is 49-79 against the 1rst half line (-37.9 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.9, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 40-65 against the 1rst half line (-31.5 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.6, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) after a win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.7, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 93-133 against the 1rst half line (-53.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.2, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the OVER against the first half total

There are 4 trends with a total rating of 2 stars.

WASHINGTON is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total against Western conference opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.6, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.0, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.6, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 15-4 OVER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 40.4, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the UNDER against the first half total

There are 37 trends with a total rating of 25 stars.

WASHINGTON is 341-246 UNDER (+70.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 26-12 UNDER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.8, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 227-173 UNDER (+36.7 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 71-41 UNDER (+25.9 Units) the 1rst half total on Friday since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.1, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 119-87 UNDER (+23.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 20-8 UNDER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.9, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 103-72 UNDER (+23.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 42-20 UNDER (+20.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 165-121 UNDER (+31.9 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 16-5 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.6, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 18-5 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.2, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a win by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.4, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 126-85 UNDER (+32.5 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.2, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 74-50 UNDER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.2, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 117-86 UNDER (+22.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 102-69 UNDER (+26.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 17-7 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.3, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 27-15 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.5, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 29-14 UNDER (+13.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.6, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.4, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 52-36 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 41-27 UNDER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 76-52 UNDER (+18.8 Units) the 1rst half total in July games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.0, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 170-114 UNDER (+44.6 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.5, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 55-35 UNDER (+16.5 Units) the 1rst half total on Friday since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 100-56 UNDER (+38.4 Units) the 1rst half total against Eastern conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.8, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 2*)

SAN ANTONIO is 13-5 UNDER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 36-20 UNDER (+14.0 Units) the 1rst half total hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.5, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 100-56 UNDER (+38.4 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.8, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 2*)

SAN ANTONIO is 124-92 UNDER (+22.8 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 24-10 UNDER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total off an home win scoring 85 or more points since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.7, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 132-97 UNDER (+25.3 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.7, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 90-62 UNDER (+21.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.7, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 57-31 UNDER (+22.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a win by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 94-64 UNDER (+23.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 119-87 UNDER (+23.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*)

ADVANCED TEAM STATS

WASHINGTON - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team				Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.
All Games	10-6	+0.7	7-9	7-9	74.1	38.8	41.6%	40.7	71.8	37.3	40.2%	43.7
Road Games	4-3	+0.9	3-4	1-6	69.4	37.6	40.5%	40.3	71.6	38.7	38.6%	46.9
Last 5 Games	4-1	+3.4	4-1	2-3	75.4	39.2	42.0%	40.6	72.0	39.6	39.2%	48.2

WASHINGTON Team Statistics
			Shooting		3pt Shooting		Free Throws		Rebounding
	PPG	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	PCT	FTM-A	Pct	Tot	Off	Ast	PF	Stl	TO	Bk
Team Stats (All Games)	74.1	38.8	27-65	41.6%	6-18	33.2%	14-18	78.6%	41	8	18	18	7	12	5
vs opponents surrendering	76.5	38.4	28-65	42.6%	5-15	33.2%	16-20	79.8%	42	8	17	19	8	14	5
Team Stats (Road Games)	69.4	37.6	25-61	40.5%	6-18	33.3%	14-17	77.9%	40	9	16	18	6	13	6
Stats Against (All Games)	71.8	37.3	28-69	40.2%	4-14	29.3%	12-15	82.6%	44	12	15	19	6	13	4
vs opponents averaging	76.2	38.8	28-67	41.8%	5-15	32.5%	15-20	77.8%	43	10	16	20	8	14	4
Stats Against (Road Games)	71.6	38.7	27-71	38.6%	3-12	25.9%	14-17	81.9%	47	14	15	19	8	12	4

SAN ANTONIO - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team				Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.
All Games	6-12	-4.2	10-7	8-10	72.7	34.6	42.1%	41.9	76.9	38.4	44.5%	41.1
Home Games	6-3	+3.8	5-4	3-6	74.9	37.2	43.9%	45.2	72.4	37.1	41.0%	39.9
Last 5 Games	3-2	+1.8	4-1	3-2	79.4	38.4	46.9%	42.4	76.4	39.6	42.6%	39.4

SAN ANTONIO Team Statistics
			Shooting		3pt Shooting		Free Throws		Rebounding
	PPG	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	PCT	FTM-A	Pct	Tot	Off	Ast	PF	Stl	TO	Bk
Team Stats (All Games)	72.7	34.6	27-63	42.1%	4-13	29.4%	16-20	78.8%	42	8	16	16	6	14	4
vs opponents surrendering	75.8	37.4	28-65	42.4%	5-15	33.3%	15-19	79.0%	42	8	16	19	7	13	4
Team Stats (Home Games)	74.9	37.2	27-62	43.9%	4-12	31.8%	17-22	76.5%	45	8	18	17	7	15	4
Stats Against (All Games)	76.9	38.4	30-68	44.5%	4-12	32.2%	12-16	75.2%	41	10	15	20	8	12	5
vs opponents averaging	76.6	38.4	28-66	42.5%	5-15	33.6%	15-19	80.0%	42	9	16	19	7	13	5
Stats Against (Home Games)	72.4	37.1	28-69	41.0%	4-11	32.4%	12-17	73.0%	40	10	14	20	9	12	5

Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 69.6, SAN ANTONIO 70.8

SCHEDULE AND RESULTS

WASHINGTON - Season Results Against the First Half Line
								Team Stats				Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	Half	Line	ATS	Tot.	O/U	Shots	Pct	REB	TO	Shots	Pct	REB	TO
6/23/2015	LOS ANGELES	84-80	39-37	-6.5	L	68	O	27-58	46.6%	32	9	34-68	50.0%	43	17
6/26/2015	@ ATLANTA	69-72	36-31	-2	W	72	U	26-57	45.6%	34	17	30-70	42.9%	45	17
6/28/2015	CHICAGO	86-71	43-34	-0.5	W	75.5	O	35-70	50.0%	40	10	31-65	47.7%	31	9
7/2/2015	@ INDIANA	50-73	34-38	-2	L	76.5	U	17-58	29.3%	39	15	29-58	50.0%	37	7
7/9/2015	NEW YORK	76-79	46-50	-2	L	71	O	27-74	36.5%	45	12	28-68	41.2%	49	16
7/15/2015	@ CHICAGO	57-85	32-51	3	L	78	O	23-70	32.9%	44	14	38-83	45.8%	54	8
7/17/2015	INDIANA	68-50	34-29	-1	W	74	U	27-70	38.6%	48	9	18-57	31.6%	39	17
7/19/2015	CONNECTICUT	89-82	39-41	-3.5	L	70.5	O	28-58	48.3%	38	12	32-74	43.2%	47	15
7/21/2015	@ TULSA	76-69	38-40	2	T	74	O	25-56	44.6%	31	8	23-73	31.5%	60	14
7/29/2015	SEATTLE	87-74	53-37	-5	W	71	O	33-70	47.1%	42	5	30-73	41.1%	41	7
7/31/2015	@ SAN ANTONIO
8/2/2015	@ CHICAGO
8/5/2015	SAN ANTONIO
8/7/2015	@ CONNECTICUT
8/9/2015	CONNECTICUT
8/11/2015	INDIANA
8/16/2015	MINNESOTA

SAN ANTONIO - Season Results Against the First Half Line
								Team Stats				Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	Half	Line	ATS	Tot.	O/U	Shots	Pct	REB	TO	Shots	Pct	REB	TO
6/25/2015	PHOENIX	76-71	32-27	1.5	W	73	U	27-63	42.9%	54	19	27-74	36.5%	37	10
6/27/2015	SEATTLE	73-71	38-40	-3	L	71	O	30-67	44.8%	45	15	29-65	44.6%	34	14
6/30/2015	@ PHOENIX	78-85	32-43	6	L	73.5	O	28-65	43.1%	32	10	34-57	59.6%	32	11
7/2/2015	@ LOS ANGELES	81-86	40-38	3	W	74	O	33-60	55.0%	34	14	31-62	50.0%	31	10
7/8/2015	LOS ANGELES	70-63	35-38	2	L	76.5	U	29-61	47.5%	45	11	24-69	34.8%	39	11
7/10/2015	@ INDIANA	76-83	38-38	4	W	75	O	28-66	42.4%	44	13	31-61	50.8%	37	10
7/12/2015	@ MINNESOTA	49-66	26-39	9	L	73.5	U	20-69	29.0%	49	13	29-70	41.4%	44	10
7/15/2015	@ NEW YORK	68-84	30-39	5	L	71.5	U	23-62	37.1%	38	11	35-73	47.9%	47	12
7/17/2015	TULSA	65-58	32-35	2.5	L	74.5	U	21-55	38.2%	54	15	21-68	30.9%	45	11
7/19/2015	@ CHICAGO	82-93	35-50	6.5	L	76.5	O	32-67	47.8%	32	9	40-74	54.1%	43	12
7/21/2015	INDIANA	80-62	48-32	1	W	74.5	O	27-45	60.0%	43	20	21-62	33.9%	25	10
7/29/2015	ATLANTA	102-85	47-42	-2	W	74.5	O	35-65	53.8%	45	17	29-66	43.9%	37	13
7/31/2015	WASHINGTON
8/2/2015	LOS ANGELES
8/4/2015	@ CONNECTICUT
8/5/2015	@ WASHINGTON
8/8/2015	SEATTLE
8/11/2015	@ MINNESOTA
8/16/2015	@ SEATTLE

HEAD-TO-HEAD HISTORY

All games in this series since 1997

WASHINGTON is 21-12 versus the first half line when playing against SAN ANTONIO since 1997

17 of 33 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997

Games over the last 3 seasons

WASHINGTON is 3-1 versus the first half line when playing against SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons

2 of 4 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons

All games played at SAN ANTONIO since 1997

WASHINGTON is 13-3 versus the first half line when playing against SAN ANTONIO since 1997

8 of 16 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997

Games played at SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons.

WASHINGTON is 2-0 versus the first half line when playing against SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons

1 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons

						Shooting		3pt shots		Free Throws		Rebounds
Date	Teams	Score	Line	Result	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	Pct	FTM-A	Pct	Tot.	OFF	TO
6/29/2014	SAN ANTONIO	73	149	SU ATS	40	26-65	40.0%	7-15	46.7%	14-20	70.0%	42	8	7
	WASHINGTON	65	-2.5	Under	32	24-63	38.1%	2-17	11.8%	15-16	93.7%	43	12	12
6/24/2014	WASHINGTON	81	152.5	SU ATS	36	32-63	50.8%	5-12	41.7%	12-13	92.3%	40	10	9
	SAN ANTONIO	70	-6	Under	33	27-69	39.1%	2-15	13.3%	14-17	82.4%	37	11	8

COACHING TRENDS

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line

There are 41 trends with a total rating of 29 stars.

Mike is 50-38 against the 1rst half line (+8.2 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.5, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 28-15 against the 1rst half line (+11.5 Units) versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.4, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 28-15 against the 1rst half line (+11.5 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.4, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 18-7 against the 1rst half line (+10.3 Units) on Friday as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.0, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 16-4 against the 1rst half line (+11.6 Units) in road games after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 40.9, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 28-14 against the 1rst half line (+12.6 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.0, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 22-10 against the 1rst half line (+11.0 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 38.9, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 15-5 against the 1rst half line (+9.5 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.0, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.9, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 16-5 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.4, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 12-4 against the 1rst half line (+7.6 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.0, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 25-15 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.6, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 15-5 against the 1rst half line (+9.5 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.3, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 39-27 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.0, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 27-12 against the 1rst half line (+13.8 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.7, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 76-94 against the 1rst half line (-27.4 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 28-42 against the 1rst half line (-18.2 Units) in a home game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.7, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 66-84 against the 1rst half line (-26.4 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.6, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 43-62 against the 1rst half line (-25.2 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.5, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 22-39 against the 1rst half line (-20.9 Units) in home games against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 83-96 against the 1rst half line (-22.6 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.9, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 35-57 against the 1rst half line (-27.7 Units) in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.7, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) in home games hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.7, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 22-39 against the 1rst half line (-20.9 Units) in home games in non-conference games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 12-23 against the 1rst half line (-13.3 Units) in home games after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 9-18 against the 1rst half line (-10.8 Units) after 2 straight games where opponent was called for 22 or more fouls as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.0, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 42-59 against the 1rst half line (-22.9 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) in home games off 2 or more consecutive home wins as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.8, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 62-78 against the 1rst half line (-23.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.2, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 43-55 against the 1rst half line (-17.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.7, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 35-49 against the 1rst half line (-18.9 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.0, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 35-53 against the 1rst half line (-23.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.2, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 39.1, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 16-27 against the 1rst half line (-13.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 11-23 against the 1rst half line (-14.3 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.9, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 33-49 against the 1rst half line (-20.9 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 67-86 against the 1rst half line (-27.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 28-44 against the 1rst half line (-20.4 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 10-21 against the 1rst half line (-13.1 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.5, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 31-43 against the 1rst half line (-16.3 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.3, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 35-47 against the 1rst half line (-16.7 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring SAN ANTONIO to cover the first half line

There are 4 trends with a total rating of 2 stars.

Mike is 31-51 against the 1rst half line (-25.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.2, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 106-87 against the 1rst half line (+10.3 Units) as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.4, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 89-76 against the 1rst half line (+5.4 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 36-23 against the 1rst half line (+10.7 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.7, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring the OVER against the first half total

There are 10 trends with a total rating of 9 stars.

Mike is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total against Western conference opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.6, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 53-34 OVER (+15.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 38.5, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.6, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 38-21 OVER (+14.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 38.1, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 66-34 OVER (+28.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.4, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.8, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.2, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 22-6 OVER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.3, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 18-7 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.2, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 40.8, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring the UNDER against the first half total

There are 82 trends with a total rating of 75 stars.

Mike is 50-38 UNDER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.5, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 26-12 UNDER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.8, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 17-8 UNDER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total on Friday as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.0, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 30-19 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.1, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 16-5 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win by 10 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.6, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 18-5 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.2, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 3*)

Mike is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.4, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 28-14 UNDER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.0, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 27-15 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.5, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 29-14 UNDER (+13.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.6, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.4, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 33-15 UNDER (+16.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 35.1, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 67-43 UNDER (+19.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 36.3, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 46-24 UNDER (+19.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 36.0, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 30-16 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 36.1, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 30-16 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.0, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 18-8 UNDER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.0, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 22-9 UNDER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.0, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 32-19 UNDER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.1, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 24-7 UNDER (+16.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a game with 24 or more assists in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 35.5, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 191-145 UNDER (+31.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 109-81 UNDER (+19.9 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.4, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 59-37 UNDER (+18.3 Units) the 1rst half total in July games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.9, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 125-85 UNDER (+31.5 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.7, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 42-29 UNDER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total on Friday as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 77-45 UNDER (+27.5 Units) the 1rst half total against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.5, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 75-41 UNDER (+29.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.4, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 47-25 UNDER (+19.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.3, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 56-36 UNDER (+16.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 97-81 UNDER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.9, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 96-83 UNDER (+4.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 45-23 UNDER (+19.7 Units) the 1rst half total hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.3, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 27-15 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 25-15 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 77-45 UNDER (+27.5 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.5, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 95-71 UNDER (+16.9 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 60-33 UNDER (+23.7 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.0, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 52-37 UNDER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 27-16 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win by 10 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 21-10 UNDER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total off an home win scoring 85 or more points as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 90-51 UNDER (+33.9 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.4, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 99-81 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 69-53 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 46-25 UNDER (+18.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 39-20 UNDER (+17.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a blowout win by 15 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 33.8, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 81-62 UNDER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.2, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 94-73 UNDER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 51-39 UNDER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.2, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 65-48 UNDER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.6, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 27-16 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.7, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 81-56 UNDER (+19.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.2, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 41-27 UNDER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 79-61 UNDER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 61-47 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 149-91 UNDER (+48.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 35.1, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 64-34 UNDER (+26.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive home games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.5, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 95-67 UNDER (+21.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 43-30 UNDER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 85-67 UNDER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 70-43 UNDER (+22.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.7, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 142-100 UNDER (+32.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.7, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 92-60 UNDER (+26.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.8, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 113-83 UNDER (+21.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.8, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 98-83 UNDER (+6.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 67-44 UNDER (+18.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.2, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 78-50 UNDER (+23.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 35.7, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 87-57 UNDER (+24.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.5, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 37-23 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.7, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 52-38 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.6, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 127-111 UNDER (+4.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.4, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 66-47 UNDER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 99-73 UNDER (+18.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.2, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 64-46 UNDER (+13.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 102-66 UNDER (+29.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.9, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 162-111 UNDER (+39.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.8, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 149-123 UNDER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 62-47 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 45-27 UNDER (+15.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.6, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 50-31 UNDER (+15.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 35.3, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 79-52 UNDER (+21.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.7, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*)

STATFOX LINE TRACKER™

Here is a summary of past results against the first half line in games where the line movement was similar to:

Opening First Half Line = 0, Closing First Half Line = 1

Since 1997, the road favorite covered the first half line 13 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 6 times.

Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite covered the first half line 2 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 0 times.

Here is a summary of past over/under results in games where the first half total movement was similar to:

Opening First Half Total = 72, Closing First Half Total = 73.5

Since 1997, 3 games went over the first half total, while 3 games went under the first half total.

Over the last 3 seasons, 2 games went under the first half total, while 1 games went over the first half total.

Here is a summary of past ATS and Over/Under results in games where the first half line and first half total were similar to:

Closing First Half Line = 1, Closing First Half Total = 73.5

Since 1997, the home underdog covered the first half line 9 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 4 times.

Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite covered the first half line 2 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 2 times.

Since 1997, 7 games went over the first half total, while 7 games went under the first half total.

Over the last 3 seasons, 3 games went under the first half total, while 1 games went over the first half total.

KEY PLAYER INJURIES

WASHINGTON

No significant injuries.

SAN ANTONIO

[F] 07/30/2015 - Danielle Adams expected to miss another 2 games ( Suspension )

[F] 07/30/2015 - Dearica Hamby "?" Friday vs. Wash Mystics ( Ankle )

[G] 07/17/2015 - Alex Montgomery out indefinitely ( Knee )

Last Updated: 5/4/2024 8:52:18 PM EST.