| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON
SAN ANTONIO |
|
|
149
| 88
Final
53 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 603 | WASHINGTON | -125 | | 604 | SAN ANTONIO | +105 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(35-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +20.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(63-40 since 1997.) (61.2%, +28.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two good offensive teams (72-76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 80 points or more.
(51-29 since 1997.) (63.8%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in non-conference games.
(25-14 since 1997.) (64.1%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(41-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +16.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after a blowout win by 15 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(31-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.5%, +16.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(56-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.9%, +27 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(287-312 since 1997.) (47.9%, +76.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more.
(261-108 since 1997.) (70.7%, +73.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more.
(262-109 since 1997.) (70.6%, +70.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more.
(244-95 since 1997.) (72%, +70.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(243-261 since 1997.) (48.2%, +70.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(251-108 since 1997.) (69.9%, +66.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(190-73 since 1997.) (72.2%, +59.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(140-54 since 1997.) (72.2%, +56.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more.
(185-72 since 1997.) (72%, +52.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(163-63 since 1997.) (72.1%, +51.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(144-96 since 1997.) (60%, +51.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(135-57 since 1997.) (70.3%, +50.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(102-23 since 1997.) (81.6%, +50 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(122-80 since 1997.) (60.4%, +48.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(177-113 since 1997.) (61%, +47.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(131-64 since 1997.) (67.2%, +46.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(35-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.8%, +18.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game, with a losing record.
(30-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +19.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games.
(40-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.5%, +18.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(134-61 since 1997.) (68.7%, +42.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games.
(76-80 over the last 5 seasons.) (48.7%, +29.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(97-34 since 1997.) (74%, +42 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game.
(110-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.8%, +40.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a losing record.
(64-16 since 1997.) (80%, +38.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(39-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (78%, +26.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games.
(106-47 since 1997.) (69.3%, +37.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(85-29 since 1997.) (74.6%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(67-19 since 1997.) (77.9%, +36.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SAN ANTONIO) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(93-52 since 1997.) (64.1%, +35.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(50-29 since 1997.) (63.3%, +34.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(60-15 since 1997.) (80%, +34.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points.
(69-42 since 1997.) (62.2%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(129-88 since 1997.) (59.4%, +31.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(72-49 since 1997.) (59.5%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game, on Friday nights.
(43-31 since 1997.) (58.1%, +29.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SAN ANTONIO) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after a win by 10 points or more.
(55-27 since 1997.) (67.1%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(62-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +18.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 or more consecutive wins against opponent after 4 or more consecutive wins.
(28-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.8%, +18.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, on Friday nights.
(57-31 since 1997.) (64.8%, +27.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season.
(49-25 since 1997.) (66.2%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, on Friday nights.
(45-26 since 1997.) (63.4%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(49-17 since 1997.) (74.2%, +26.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(39-12 since 1997.) (76.5%, +26.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, in May, June, or July games.
(46-24 since 1997.) (65.7%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(90-81 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.6%, +29.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two good offensive teams (72-76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 80 points or more.
(51-29 since 1997.) (63.8%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game against opponent after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games.
(27-17 since 1997.) (61.4%, +25.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game, with a losing record.
(52-18 since 1997.) (74.3%, +24 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(54-33 since 1997.) (62.1%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 2 straight games making 50% of their shots or better.
(30-7 since 1997.) (81.1%, +21.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(109-91 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.5%, +35.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(23-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.1%, +21.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, on Friday nights.
(34-16 since 1997.) (68%, +18.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in July games.
(36-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +16.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record.
(26-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +19.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential) against a poor team (-3 to -7 PPG differential), after a win by 10 points or more.
(21-7 since 1997.) (75%, +15.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(102-56 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +24.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(111-83 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.2%, +39.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(55-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +21.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(32-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +22.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(42-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +26.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(27-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.5%, +14 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(41-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.5%, +23.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(43-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +26.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(29-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.7%, +17 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(63-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.4%, +20.6 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| WASHINGTON | 74 | | 28-67 | 42.1% | 6-18 | 32.6% | 11-14 | 78.4% | 42 | 10 | 11 | | SAN ANTONIO | 71 | | 27-66 | 41.1% | 4-13 | 27.8% | 13-16 | 78.3% | 45 | 12 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON won the game straight up 571 times, while SAN ANTONIO won 397 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 14-5 against the money line (+10.7 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.2, OPPONENT 70.0 | WASHINGTON is 8-0 against the money line (+9.8 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.1, OPPONENT 68.3 | WASHINGTON is 9-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.4, OPPONENT 70.9 | SAN ANTONIO is 55-52 against the money line (-30.3 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.1, OPPONENT 81.3 | SAN ANTONIO is 36-82 against the money line (-66.9 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.2, OPPONENT 77.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 21-54 against the money line (-34.6 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 69.5, OPPONENT 75.9 | SAN ANTONIO is 19-27 against the money line (-19.2 Units) in home games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 76.9 | SAN ANTONIO is 23-26 against the money line (-20.4 Units) in home games when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.9, OPPONENT 79.3 | SAN ANTONIO is 13-30 against the money line (-17.8 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 79.2 | SAN ANTONIO is 9-22 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.5, OPPONENT 80.6 | SAN ANTONIO is 5-17 against the money line (-15.9 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 81.7 | SAN ANTONIO is 4-13 against the money line (-10.7 Units) when they score 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 68.9, OPPONENT 76.9 | SAN ANTONIO is 81-129 against the money line (-59.4 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.4, OPPONENT 75.1 |
|
WASHINGTON is 88-148 against the money line (-52.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.9, OPPONENT 78.1 | WASHINGTON is 70-103 against the money line (-43.0 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 73.2 | WASHINGTON is 49-104 against the money line (-69.5 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 67.9, OPPONENT 72.3 | WASHINGTON is 121-192 against the money line (-75.1 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 74.2 | WASHINGTON is 133-187 against the money line (-57.2 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 73.3 | SAN ANTONIO is 17-13 against the money line (+13.9 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.5, OPPONENT 76.5 | SAN ANTONIO is 8-3 against the money line (+7.7 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.0, OPPONENT 75.1 |
|
| | |
|
SAN ANTONIO is 76-105 against the money line (-43.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 108-141 against the money line (-52.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.2, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 28-58 against the money line (-34.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.1, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 73-64 against the money line (-40.4 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.4, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 88-130 against the money line (-51.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 153-202 against the money line (-60.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.8, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 2-9 against the money line (-8.0 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.9, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 4-13 against the money line (-10.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.7, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 118-142 against the money line (-56.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 62-81 against the money line (-41.6 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 86-145 against the money line (-67.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.5, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 133-201 against the money line (-72.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 115-192 against the money line (-83.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 182-279 against the money line (-97.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 14-24 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.5, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 23-54 against the money line (-32.2 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.2, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 35-74 against the money line (-33.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.9, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 10-32 against the money line (-20.3 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 67.8, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 22-56 against the money line (-27.2 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 66-101 against the money line (-44.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 32-36 against the money line (-23.2 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 38-72 against the money line (-30.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.3, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 5-0 against the money line (+6.5 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.8, OPPONENT 65.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 29-12 against the money line (+18.4 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 18-8 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in home games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.2, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 11-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.6, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-4 against the money line (+7.6 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.6, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-3 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.8, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 191-253 against the money line (-72.5 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 114-108 against the money line (-48.8 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.8, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 38-40 against the money line (-35.3 Units) in a home game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.0, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 91-83 against the money line (-44.7 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.8, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 3-8 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in home games on Friday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 68-89 against the money line (-37.1 Units) against Eastern conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.3, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 92-140 against the money line (-56.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.4, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 100-146 against the money line (-64.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.3, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 9-19 against the money line (-22.7 Units) in home games hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.9, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 3*) | SAN ANTONIO is 68-89 against the money line (-37.1 Units) in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.3, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 46-79 against the money line (-48.6 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.7, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 1-6 against the money line (-7.6 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.3, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 2-6 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in home games off 2 or more consecutive home wins since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 63-88 against the money line (-36.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 72-94 against the money line (-37.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 49-64 against the money line (-36.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 46-49 against the money line (-38.1 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.5, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 41-61 against the money line (-30.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 8-14 against the money line (-17.7 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 79.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 6-11 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 83.3, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 4-10 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in home games after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 81.1, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 65-92 against the money line (-34.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 16-22 against the money line (-24.7 Units) in home games after a combined score of 165 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 86-118 against the money line (-42.7 Units) after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 16-26 against the money line (-27.0 Units) in home games after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | SAN ANTONIO is 43-46 against the money line (-36.3 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.5, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 14-18 against the money line (-20.6 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.6, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 13-22 against the money line (-19.8 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.5, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 238-359 against the money line (-112.4 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 74-114 against the money line (-47.5 Units) in July games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 168-240 against the money line (-68.2 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 105-164 against the money line (-59.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 110-183 against the money line (-75.0 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 5-13 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 18-41 against the money line (-21.5 Units) in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 1-7 against the money line (-7.4 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 13-24 against the money line (-21.4 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 21-38 against the money line (-22.2 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 103-132 against the money line (-44.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 19-35 against the money line (-22.4 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.9, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 4-0 against the money line (+5.5 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.8, OPPONENT 63.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 12-8 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.7, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 11-7 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.8, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 6-1 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.7, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 10-3 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in home games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.7, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 10-6 | +0.7 | 7-9 | 7-9 | 74.1 | 38.8 | 41.6% | 40.7 | 71.8 | 37.3 | 40.2% | 43.7 | | Road Games | 4-3 | +0.9 | 3-4 | 1-6 | 69.4 | 37.6 | 40.5% | 40.3 | 71.6 | 38.7 | 38.6% | 46.9 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.4 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 75.4 | 39.2 | 42.0% | 40.6 | 72.0 | 39.6 | 39.2% | 48.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 74.1 | 38.8 | 27-65 | 41.6% | 6-18 | 33.2% | 14-18 | 78.6% | 41 | 8 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 76.5 | 38.4 | 28-65 | 42.6% | 5-15 | 33.2% | 16-20 | 79.8% | 42 | 8 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 69.4 | 37.6 | 25-61 | 40.5% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 14-17 | 77.9% | 40 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 6 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.8 | 37.3 | 28-69 | 40.2% | 4-14 | 29.3% | 12-15 | 82.6% | 44 | 12 | 15 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 76.2 | 38.8 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 5-15 | 32.5% | 15-20 | 77.8% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 71.6 | 38.7 | 27-71 | 38.6% | 3-12 | 25.9% | 14-17 | 81.9% | 47 | 14 | 15 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 6-12 | -4.2 | 10-7 | 8-10 | 72.7 | 34.6 | 42.1% | 41.9 | 76.9 | 38.4 | 44.5% | 41.1 | | Home Games | 6-3 | +3.8 | 5-4 | 3-6 | 74.9 | 37.2 | 43.9% | 45.2 | 72.4 | 37.1 | 41.0% | 39.9 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1.8 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 79.4 | 38.4 | 46.9% | 42.4 | 76.4 | 39.6 | 42.6% | 39.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 72.7 | 34.6 | 27-63 | 42.1% | 4-13 | 29.4% | 16-20 | 78.8% | 42 | 8 | 16 | 16 | 6 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75.8 | 37.4 | 28-65 | 42.4% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 79.0% | 42 | 8 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 74.9 | 37.2 | 27-62 | 43.9% | 4-12 | 31.8% | 17-22 | 76.5% | 45 | 8 | 18 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.9 | 38.4 | 30-68 | 44.5% | 4-12 | 32.2% | 12-16 | 75.2% | 41 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 76.6 | 38.4 | 28-66 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 33.6% | 15-19 | 80.0% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 72.4 | 37.1 | 28-69 | 41.0% | 4-11 | 32.4% | 12-17 | 73.0% | 40 | 10 | 14 | 20 | 9 | 12 | 5 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 69.6, SAN ANTONIO 70.8 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/23/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 84-80 | W | -650 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 32 | 9 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 43 | 17 | | 6/26/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 69-72 | L | -165 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 34 | 17 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 45 | 17 | | 6/28/2015 | CHICAGO | 86-71 | W | -115 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 40 | 10 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 31 | 9 | | 7/2/2015 | @ INDIANA | 50-73 | L | -165 | 17-58 | 29.3% | 39 | 15 | 29-58 | 50.0% | 37 | 7 | | 7/9/2015 | NEW YORK | 76-79 | L | -175 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 45 | 12 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 49 | 16 | | 7/15/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 57-85 | L | +180 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 44 | 14 | 38-83 | 45.8% | 54 | 8 | | 7/17/2015 | INDIANA | 68-50 | W | -125 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 48 | 9 | 18-57 | 31.6% | 39 | 17 | | 7/19/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 89-82 | W | -270 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 38 | 12 | 32-74 | 43.2% | 47 | 15 | | 7/21/2015 | @ TULSA | 76-69 | W | +145 | 25-56 | 44.6% | 31 | 8 | 23-73 | 31.5% | 60 | 14 | | 7/29/2015 | SEATTLE | 87-74 | W | -450 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 42 | 5 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 41 | 7 | | 7/31/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2015 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/25/2015 | PHOENIX | 76-71 | W | +120 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 54 | 19 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 37 | 10 | | 6/27/2015 | SEATTLE | 73-71 | W | -220 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 45 | 15 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 34 | 14 | | 6/30/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 78-85 | L | +400 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 32 | 10 | 34-57 | 59.6% | 32 | 11 | | 7/2/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 81-86 | L | +200 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 34 | 14 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 31 | 10 | | 7/8/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 70-63 | W | +155 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 45 | 11 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 39 | 11 | | 7/10/2015 | @ INDIANA | 76-83 | L | +250 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 44 | 13 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 37 | 10 | | 7/12/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 49-66 | L | | 20-69 | 29.0% | 49 | 13 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 44 | 10 | | 7/15/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 68-84 | L | +325 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 38 | 11 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 47 | 12 | | 7/17/2015 | TULSA | 65-58 | W | +170 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 54 | 15 | 21-68 | 30.9% | 45 | 11 | | 7/19/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 82-93 | L | +500 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 32 | 9 | 40-74 | 54.1% | 43 | 12 | | 7/21/2015 | INDIANA | 80-62 | W | +105 | 27-45 | 60.0% | 43 | 20 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 25 | 10 | | 7/29/2015 | ATLANTA | 102-85 | W | -165 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 45 | 17 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 37 | 13 | | 7/31/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2015 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2015 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2015 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| WASHINGTON is 16-16 (+1.8 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 3-1 (+3.1 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| WASHINGTON is 9-6 (+9.4 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 2-0 (+3.5 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/29/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 73 | 149 | SU ATS | 40 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 14-20 | 70.0% | 42 | 8 | 7 | | | WASHINGTON | 65 | -2.5 | Under | 32 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 2-17 | 11.8% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 43 | 12 | 12 | 6/24/2014 | WASHINGTON | 81 | 152.5 | SU ATS | 36 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 40 | 10 | 9 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 70 | -6 | Under | 33 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 2-15 | 13.3% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 37 | 11 | 8 |
|
| | |
|
Mike is 170-118 against the money line (+26.6 Units) in May, June, or July games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 76.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 63-39 against the money line (+18.2 Units) on Friday in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 76.4, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 92-66 against the money line (+20.8 Units) after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 77.4, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 46-26 against the money line (+27.9 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 76.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 19-13 against the money line (+12.2 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 15-5 against the money line (+13.6 Units) in road games after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 78.9, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 24-18 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.1, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 61-41 against the money line (+17.4 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 77.1, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 51-32 against the money line (+17.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 73.7, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 77-55 against the money line (+17.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 73.8, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 1-5 against the money line (-7.5 Units) in home games after a game with 24 or more assists as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 156-183 against the money line (-38.7 Units) in all games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 91-79 against the money line (-32.4 Units) in home games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.2, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 37-35 against the money line (-29.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.4, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 81-69 against the money line (-31.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 30-44 against the money line (-20.7 Units) on Friday as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.0, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 30-31 against the money line (-24.9 Units) in home games against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 77-98 against the money line (-30.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 82-103 against the money line (-40.4 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 8-12 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in home games hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 81.7, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 30-31 against the money line (-24.9 Units) in home games in non-conference games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 74-89 against the money line (-26.9 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.3, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 7-12 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after a game where opponent was called for 27 or more fouls in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 70.8, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 42-57 against the money line (-29.6 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 25-30 against the money line (-20.1 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 81-98 against the money line (-23.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.8, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 52-68 against the money line (-24.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 65-74 against the money line (-25.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 45-51 against the money line (-27.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 25-29 against the money line (-26.8 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 43-39 against the money line (-28.0 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 39-48 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.2, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 8-11 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 4-8 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in home games after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 82.9, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 60-74 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 15-17 against the money line (-18.2 Units) in home games after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.4, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 14-22 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.0, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 73-85 against the money line (-26.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.2, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 15-18 against the money line (-17.4 Units) in home games after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.8, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 38-35 against the money line (-26.3 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 13-13 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 79.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 27-34 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 12-17 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 2-6 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in home games after 2 straight games making 45% of their 3 point shots or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 75.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 41-64 against the money line (-25.3 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 19-34 against the money line (-17.1 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 60-73 against the money line (-28.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 86-96 against the money line (-31.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 39-33 against the money line (-20.9 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 21-42 against the money line (-22.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.4, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 114-121 against the money line (-35.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 47-66 against the money line (-26.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 71-100 against the money line (-46.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 47-62 against the money line (-21.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.5, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 42-40 against the money line (-21.2 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.8, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 83-100 against the money line (-28.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.7, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 125-146 against the money line (-39.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 47-62 against the money line (-20.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.9, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 71-78 against the money line (-23.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 101-112 against the money line (-30.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 19-36 against the money line (-18.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.8, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 33-57 against the money line (-23.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Mike is 5-13 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 1-7 against the money line (-7.4 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 14-24 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.5, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 39-43 against the money line (-29.5 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 73.3, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 52-44 against the money line (+10.4 Units) in July games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.3, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 109-106 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 10-4 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after covering 8 or more of their last 10 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 82.4, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 21-9 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 79.4, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 13-6 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in home games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 14 times, while the home underdog won straight up 6 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 2 times, while the home underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [F] 07/30/2015 - Danielle Adams expected to miss another 2 games ( Suspension ) | | [F] 07/30/2015 - Dearica Hamby "?" Friday vs. Wash Mystics ( Ankle ) | | [G] 07/17/2015 - Alex Montgomery out indefinitely ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/4/2024 11:43:31 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|