| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA
MINNESOTA |
|
|
155.5
| 70
Final
86 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 605 | ATLANTA | +650 | | 606 | MINNESOTA | -1050 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(306-112 since 1997.) (73.2%, +93.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(253-87 since 1997.) (74.4%, +91.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(270-74 since 1997.) (78.5%, +86.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(223-58 since 1997.) (79.4%, +81.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 8 or more of their last 10 games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(220-77 since 1997.) (74.1%, +71.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(177-58 since 1997.) (75.3%, +70.4 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(143-35 since 1997.) (80.3%, +65.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(172-53 since 1997.) (76.4%, +63.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(157-41 since 1997.) (79.3%, +61.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games.
(193-122 since 1997.) (61.3%, +55 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games.
(138-72 since 1997.) (65.7%, +50.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(90-21 since 1997.) (81.1%, +45.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(107-51 since 1997.) (67.7%, +45 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(38-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.4%, +29 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(51-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.8%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(29-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.3%, +29.5 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(29-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.3%, +29.5 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(29-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.3%, +29.5 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(90-40 since 1997.) (69.2%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - average defensive team (65-72 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more.
(70-30 since 1997.) (70%, +34 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(155-80 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +65.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(39-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +28.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - average defensive team (65-72 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(59-26 since 1997.) (69.4%, +28.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(62-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +18.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(35-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +25.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against a poor shooting team (38-40.5%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(49-16 since 1997.) (75.4%, +27.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against a poor shooting team (38-40.5%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(49-16 since 1997.) (75.4%, +27.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against a poor shooting team (38-40.5%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(49-16 since 1997.) (75.4%, +27.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - poor shooting team (38-40.5%) against an good defensive team (38-40.5%), after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(35-7 since 1997.) (83.3%, +24.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(38-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.1%, +25.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(81-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.8%, +19.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against a poor team (-3 to -7 PPG differential), after allowing 75 points or more.
(26-5 since 1997.) (83.9%, +19.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(26-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.2%, +23.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(26-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.2%, +23.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(26-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.2%, +23.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 90 points or more.
(45-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +25 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(103-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +49.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(103-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +49.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(103-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +49.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(40-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +20.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(28-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.4%, +18.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(211-162 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.6%, +57 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(102-56 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +24.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(32-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +22.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(29-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.7%, +21.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(196-143 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.8%, +57 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(63-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.4%, +20.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(75-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after one or more consecutive overs, an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG).
(71-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.5%, +38 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a home win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season.
(128-71 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +43.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(73-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.7%, +42.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(62-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.2%, +40.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(55-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.4%, +32.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(42-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.6%, +40.5 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(91-75 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.8%, +39.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a combined score of 155 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(61-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.5%, +35.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(95-69 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.9%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(36-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.5%, +36.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(27-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +38.3 units. Rating = 6*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(49-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.5%, +27 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(90-81 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.6%, +29.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(54-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(41-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.6%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(55-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.9%, +26.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(33-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +19.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(66-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.5%, +28.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(42-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.5%, +22.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(45-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.4%, +32.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(37-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +26.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(27-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +22.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(40-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(38-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.1%, +24.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(52-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.9%, +24.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games.
(28-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +23.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games.
(19-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.3%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| ATLANTA | 68 | | 27-68 | 39.1% | 4-15 | 29.4% | 11-14 | 75.1% | 41 | 10 | 17 | | MINNESOTA | 82 | | 30-64 | 47.5% | 4-11 | 37.2% | 17-20 | 83.4% | 43 | 8 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 842 times, while ATLANTA won 141 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 90-94 against the money line (-41.1 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.4, OPPONENT 74.0 |
|
ATLANTA is 5-11 against the money line (-18.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.5, OPPONENT 81.2 | ATLANTA is 5-11 against the money line (-20.3 Units) when they make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 72.4, OPPONENT 76.6 | ATLANTA is 3-11 against the money line (-16.1 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.6, OPPONENT 80.4 | ATLANTA is 7-15 against the money line (-15.2 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 70.9, OPPONENT 77.2 | ATLANTA is 21-31 against the money line (-29.3 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.3, OPPONENT 81.8 | ATLANTA is 10-14 against the money line (-16.7 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 80.6 | ATLANTA is 5-9 against the money line (-13.9 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 80.6 | ATLANTA is 0-9 against the money line (-13.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 89.3 | ATLANTA is 11-18 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in road games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.4, OPPONENT 78.6 | ATLANTA is 55-63 against the money line (-29.8 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 80.5 | ATLANTA is 20-33 against the money line (-21.9 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.0, OPPONENT 79.8 | ATLANTA is 6-9 against the money line (-12.1 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 79.5 | ATLANTA is 3-12 against the money line (-23.3 Units) when they score 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 68.5, OPPONENT 75.9 | ATLANTA is 11-20 against the money line (-13.1 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.1, OPPONENT 80.4 | MINNESOTA is 29-2 against the money line (+23.2 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 70.5 | MINNESOTA is 11-2 against the money line (+9.3 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 76.5 | MINNESOTA is 22-1 against the money line (+20.0 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 67.5 | MINNESOTA is 84-40 against the money line (+50.2 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.0, OPPONENT 71.7 | MINNESOTA is 30-7 against the money line (+16.2 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 75.6 | MINNESOTA is 27-7 against the money line (+16.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.0, OPPONENT 79.9 |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 38-55 against the money line (-26.5 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 6-21 against the money line (-18.4 Units) when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 3-13 against the money line (-12.3 Units) when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 11-16 against the money line (-15.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 24-32 against the money line (-20.8 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.1, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 15-29 against the money line (-22.4 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.7, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 27-42 against the money line (-26.7 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.8, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-14 against the money line (-16.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 19-21 against the money line (-18.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-12 against the money line (-11.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.3, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 27-31 against the money line (-18.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 3-10 against the money line (-12.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 11-19 against the money line (-16.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-15 against the money line (-20.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 16-20 against the money line (-18.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 9-15 against the money line (-17.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 20-22 against the money line (-17.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-13 against the money line (-17.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.3, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 15-18 against the money line (-17.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-7 against the money line (-9.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 83.6, OPPONENT 89.9 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 12-18 against the money line (-15.9 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 28-49 against the money line (-25.0 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 5-17 against the money line (-14.2 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.3, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 9-26 against the money line (-20.3 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 8-13 against the money line (-16.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 14-17 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-10 against the money line (-10.1 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.4, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 2-14 against the money line (-13.1 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 6-12 against the money line (-12.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 4-11 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 34-6 against the money line (+18.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.7, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 31-9 against the money line (+17.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 46-17 against the money line (+18.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 29-10 against the money line (+13.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 38-10 against the money line (+22.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 54-19 against the money line (+21.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 16-3 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 36-10 against the money line (+20.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 50-18 against the money line (+20.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 26-5 against the money line (+16.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 26-9 against the money line (+12.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 76-96 against the money line (-56.4 Units) in July games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 72.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 187-192 against the money line (-70.3 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.9, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 45-60 against the money line (-29.8 Units) on Friday since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 57-42 against the money line (-32.2 Units) in home games against Eastern conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.4, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 175-180 against the money line (-63.0 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 147-146 against the money line (-62.4 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.2, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 57-42 against the money line (-32.2 Units) in home games in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.4, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 16-20 against the money line (-20.5 Units) after a game giving up 4 or less offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.3, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 47-40 against the money line (-31.8 Units) in home games after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.0, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 7-11 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 9-18 against the money line (-15.3 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 9-18 against the money line (-15.3 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 7-16 against the money line (-15.8 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 10-14 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-11 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 3-15 against the money line (-16.3 Units) in road games against Western conference opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 73.9, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 12-20 against the money line (-21.9 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 3-12 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.3, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 8-18 against the money line (-16.4 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.3, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 1-7 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in road games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.4, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-10 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 2-9 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.7, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 3-15 against the money line (-16.3 Units) in road games in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 73.9, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 14-14 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-9 against the money line (-10.5 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 71.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-6 against the money line (-7.4 Units) after 2 straight games where they were called for 22 or more fouls over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.7, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-11 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-10 against the money line (-12.3 Units) in road games after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.1, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 11-16 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-11 against the money line (-21.0 Units) off a road loss over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 2-10 against the money line (-18.2 Units) off 2 or more consecutive road losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.6, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 7*) | ATLANTA is 4-11 against the money line (-17.5 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 15-20 against the money line (-19.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 10-18 against the money line (-22.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 8-16 against the money line (-18.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 6-14 against the money line (-18.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 18-19 against the money line (-21.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 11-15 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-11 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 19-21 against the money line (-22.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-11 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 3-7 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.5, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 7-12 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.5, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 10-20 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after a blowout loss by 15 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 8-15 against the money line (-20.6 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 4-9 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 2-7 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.8, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 18-19 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 21-22 against the money line (-19.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-16 against the money line (-20.3 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 13-16 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 12-20 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.1, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 10-13 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 27-27 against the money line (-24.0 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 16-14 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 5-9 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-10 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 3-8 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.9, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 2-6 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after playing a road game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.4, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 2-9 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 7*) | ATLANTA is 2-7 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after playing 3 consecutive road games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.8, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 21-26 against the money line (-25.9 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 12-14 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 11-16 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.6, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 1-7 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in road games after 3 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 70.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 66-21 against the money line (+21.2 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 64-13 against the money line (+26.8 Units) as a favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 35-4 against the money line (+22.3 Units) as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 35-4 against the money line (+22.3 Units) in home games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 35-4 against the money line (+22.3 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 27-3 against the money line (+17.9 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 24-7 against the money line (+14.9 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 44-13 against the money line (+24.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after 2 straight games where they were called for 15 or less fouls over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 67.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 10-3 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 39-13 against the money line (+15.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 34-11 against the money line (+17.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 29-9 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 28-6 against the money line (+17.2 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 11-1 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 29-16 against the money line (+15.9 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 58-18 against the money line (+20.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 46-11 against the money line (+25.9 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 40-10 against the money line (+23.1 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 33-10 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 20-5 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 7-11 | -14.5 | 9-9 | 9-9 | 75.3 | 36.9 | 40.3% | 44.3 | 79.8 | 39.6 | 44.5% | 40.8 | | Road Games | 2-7 | -6.1 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 77.1 | 37.7 | 41.0% | 39.8 | 84.7 | 42.0 | 48.0% | 40.9 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.2 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 79.4 | 41.2 | 42.0% | 38.0 | 87.4 | 42.4 | 49.8% | 41.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 75.3 | 36.9 | 28-69 | 40.3% | 5-15 | 30.5% | 15-20 | 75.2% | 44 | 12 | 16 | 23 | 9 | 17 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75.7 | 38.1 | 28-67 | 42.0% | 5-15 | 33.2% | 15-18 | 79.2% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 77.1 | 37.7 | 28-69 | 41.0% | 6-17 | 34.9% | 15-19 | 78.5% | 40 | 10 | 16 | 22 | 9 | 16 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.8 | 39.6 | 28-62 | 44.5% | 5-15 | 33.7% | 20-24 | 81.1% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 20 | 9 | 16 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.8 | 38 | 28-66 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 32.2% | 15-19 | 79.5% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 84.7 | 42.0 | 30-62 | 48.0% | 4-12 | 37.7% | 20-24 | 84.8% | 41 | 7 | 17 | 18 | 9 | 16 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 13-4 | -0.1 | 9-8 | 7-10 | 77.9 | 37.1 | 45.7% | 41.2 | 69.9 | 35.0 | 40.5% | 38.5 | | Home Games | 7-2 | -0.9 | 5-4 | 4-5 | 79.7 | 37.9 | 45.8% | 42.6 | 68.1 | 33.0 | 38.9% | 39.0 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +0.4 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 81.4 | 35.6 | 45.2% | 40.4 | 74.2 | 35.6 | 42.9% | 39.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 77.9 | 37.1 | 30-65 | 45.7% | 4-12 | 36.4% | 14-17 | 83.5% | 41 | 9 | 18 | 16 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 76.6 | 38 | 28-66 | 43.2% | 5-15 | 33.2% | 15-19 | 78.0% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 79.7 | 37.9 | 31-67 | 45.8% | 5-12 | 42.3% | 13-16 | 82.5% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 15 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.9 | 35.0 | 27-66 | 40.5% | 6-18 | 32.7% | 11-13 | 82.2% | 38 | 7 | 16 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.5 | 37.7 | 28-66 | 42.3% | 5-16 | 33.2% | 15-18 | 80.1% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 68.1 | 33.0 | 26-67 | 38.9% | 5-17 | 31.2% | 11-12 | 88.0% | 39 | 8 | 17 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 70.7, MINNESOTA 70.2 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/21/2015 | NEW YORK | 64-73 | L | -210 | 19-64 | 29.7% | 45 | 18 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 44 | 21 | | 6/24/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 96-100 | L | +300 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 50 | 13 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 49 | 15 | | 6/26/2015 | WASHINGTON | 72-69 | W | +145 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 45 | 17 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 34 | 17 | | 7/5/2015 | SEATTLE | 72-64 | W | -270 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 49 | 12 | 23-59 | 39.0% | 36 | 14 | | 7/7/2015 | TULSA | 75-85 | L | -210 | 31-80 | 38.7% | 54 | 17 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 48 | 18 | | 7/12/2015 | NEW YORK | 84-76 | W | +145 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 40 | 15 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 45 | 17 | | 7/14/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 71-80 | L | +375 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 39 | 14 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 41 | 10 | | 7/16/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 76-72 | W | +120 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 42 | 15 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 38 | 16 | | 7/18/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 73-86 | L | -140 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 39 | 19 | 33-58 | 56.9% | 40 | 16 | | 7/21/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 92-97 | L | +350 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 33 | 14 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 42 | 15 | | 7/29/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 85-102 | L | +145 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 37 | 13 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 45 | 17 | | 7/31/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2015 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2015 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/21/2015 | TULSA | 78-86 | L | -330 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 32 | 16 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 44 | 11 | | 6/25/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 76-73 | W | -600 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 40 | 14 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 36 | 17 | | 6/27/2015 | PHOENIX | 71-56 | W | -270 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 40 | 12 | 19-57 | 33.3% | 42 | 20 | | 7/3/2015 | SEATTLE | 82-57 | W | -950 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 42 | 13 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 28 | 12 | | 7/10/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 83-90 | L | -165 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 41 | 9 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 40 | 10 | | 7/12/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 66-49 | W | | 29-70 | 41.4% | 44 | 10 | 20-69 | 29.0% | 49 | 13 | | 7/14/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 85-79 | W | -270 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 34 | 15 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 14 | | 7/17/2015 | CHICAGO | 84-66 | W | -210 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 46 | 10 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 47 | 12 | | 7/19/2015 | @ TULSA | 79-72 | W | -155 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 41 | 11 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 38 | 13 | | 7/22/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 77-78 | L | -360 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 50 | 16 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 42 | 15 | | 7/29/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 82-76 | W | -400 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 31 | 12 | 31-55 | 56.4% | 32 | 21 | | 7/31/2015 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/1/2015 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2015 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2015 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| MINNESOTA is 15-5 (+5.6 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 5-2 (+2.6 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| MINNESOTA is 9-2 (+0.9 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 4-0 (+4.0 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/22/2014 | ATLANTA | 108 | 163.5 | ATS | 48 | 42-93 | 45.2% | 10-33 | 30.3% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 45 | 9 | 14 | | | MINNESOTA | 112 | -5 | SU Over | 52 | 42-86 | 48.8% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 20-23 | 87.0% | 58 | 9 | 21 | 6/13/2014 | MINNESOTA | 82 | 163 | Over | 33 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 20-22 | 90.9% | 42 | 9 | 12 | | | ATLANTA | 85 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 9-15 | 60.0% | 16-22 | 72.7% | 46 | 14 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Michael is 102-43 against the money line (+41.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 76.7, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 95-63 against the money line (+19.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 75.4, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 12-12 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after a game giving up 4 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Michael is 27-28 against the money line (-29.2 Units) in all games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 9-18 against the money line (-15.3 Units) in road games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 9-18 against the money line (-15.3 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 7-16 against the money line (-15.8 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 24-20 against the money line (-18.7 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 14-14 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 1-6 against the money line (-7.4 Units) after 2 straight games where they were called for 22 or more fouls as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.7, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 8-11 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 6-11 against the money line (-21.0 Units) off a road loss as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 5*) | Michael is 15-20 against the money line (-19.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 10-18 against the money line (-22.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Michael is 8-16 against the money line (-18.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 6-14 against the money line (-18.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Michael is 18-19 against the money line (-21.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 11-15 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 7-11 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 3-7 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.5, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Michael is 8-15 against the money line (-20.6 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Michael is 4-9 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 2-7 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.8, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 18-19 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 10-13 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 22-24 against the money line (-23.5 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 74.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 16-14 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 5-9 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 6-10 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 3-8 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.9, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 9-17 against the money line (-30.3 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 7*) | Michael is 2-9 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 7*) | Michael is 12-14 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 9-14 against the money line (-16.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 19-21 against the money line (-18.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 7-12 against the money line (-11.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.3, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 3-10 against the money line (-12.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 6-15 against the money line (-20.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 5*) | Michael is 16-20 against the money line (-18.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 9-15 against the money line (-17.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 20-22 against the money line (-17.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 6-13 against the money line (-17.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.3, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Michael is 15-18 against the money line (-17.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 1-7 against the money line (-9.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 83.6, OPPONENT 89.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 8-13 against the money line (-16.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 14-17 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 6-12 against the money line (-12.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 4-11 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 134-61 against the money line (+29.5 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 112-35 against the money line (+20.9 Units) as a favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 69-16 against the money line (+24.6 Units) as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 73-19 against the money line (+27.4 Units) in home games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 73-19 against the money line (+27.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 55-16 against the money line (+17.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 83-37 against the money line (+22.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 36-16 against the money line (+13.6 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 49-20 against the money line (+17.4 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 57-21 against the money line (+16.2 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 53-17 against the money line (+22.5 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 44-12 against the money line (+19.7 Units) off a home win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.2, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 33-5 against the money line (+18.5 Units) in home games off a win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.4, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 24-6 against the money line (+13.8 Units) off a no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 60-20 against the money line (+23.7 Units) off a home win as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 68-29 against the money line (+16.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 99-45 against the money line (+17.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 44-16 against the money line (+14.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 32-6 against the money line (+16.6 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 77-34 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 20-4 against the money line (+16.8 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 5*) | Cheryl is 75-31 against the money line (+18.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 107-39 against the money line (+34.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 87-30 against the money line (+21.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 75-22 against the money line (+29.1 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 66-16 against the money line (+31.7 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 53-16 against the money line (+18.0 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 67-26 against the money line (+22.6 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 70-30 against the money line (+22.3 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 52-25 against the money line (+16.0 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 97-38 against the money line (+26.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 61-21 against the money line (+19.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 70-31 against the money line (+23.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 93-48 against the money line (+20.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 59-26 against the money line (+17.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 80-32 against the money line (+28.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 107-50 against the money line (+24.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 26-7 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 36-10 against the money line (+20.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 7-1 against the money line (+6.9 Units) in home games versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 74-30 against the money line (+29.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 97-47 against the money line (+22.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 42-13 against the money line (+17.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 58-22 against the money line (+23.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 63-32 against the money line (+14.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 16 times, while the road underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 4 times, while the road underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [F] 07/29/2015 - Cierra Burdick missed last game, "?" Friday vs. Min Lynx ( Foot ) | | [F] 07/29/2015 - Angel McCoughtry injured last game, probable Friday vs. Min Lynx ( Groin ) | | [F] 07/29/2015 - Sancho Lyttle missed last game, "?" Friday vs. Min Lynx ( Foot ) | | [G] 06/06/2015 - Celine Dumerc out for season ( Suspension ) | |
| [G] 07/30/2015 - Anna Cruz "?" Friday vs. Atlanta Dream ( Ankle ) | | [G] 07/18/2015 - Seimone Augustus expected to miss a month ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/5/2024 10:33:32 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|