| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES CHICAGO |
|
| 163 | 88 Final 77 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
607 | LOS ANGELES | +180 | 608 | CHICAGO | -220 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games. (193-122 since 1997.) (61.3%, +55 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after going over the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (86-44 since 1997.) (66.2%, +37 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (96-52 since 1997.) (64.9%, +36.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games. (68-21 since 1997.) (76.4%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less. (74-46 since 1997.) (61.7%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less. (33-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.2%, +26.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games. (43-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.5%, +22.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less. (24-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +19.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (46-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +17.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (102-56 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +24.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (75-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (272-259 since 1997.) (51.2%, +85 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (287-312 since 1997.) (47.9%, +76.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws. (277-263 since 1997.) (51.3%, +73.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (243-261 since 1997.) (48.2%, +70.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (110-96 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.4%, +34.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (176-170 since 1997.) (50.9%, +62.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after one or more consecutive overs, terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season. (248-238 since 1997.) (51%, +56.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games. (193-122 since 1997.) (61.3%, +55 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days. (50-59 since 1997.) (45.9%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games. (76-80 over the last 5 seasons.) (48.7%, +29.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (150-150 since 1997.) (50%, +41.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games. (84-74 since 1997.) (53.2%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after a loss by 6 points or less. (33-20 since 1997.) (62.3%, +37.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games. (97-62 since 1997.) (61%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (95-69 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.9%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after a loss by 6 points or less. (26-19 since 1997.) (57.8%, +32 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher. (54-34 since 1997.) (61.4%, +30.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (34-15 since 1997.) (69.4%, +26.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (90-81 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.6%, +29.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more. (139-132 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.3%, +44.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (109-91 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.5%, +35.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher. (23-7 since 1997.) (76.7%, +17.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after going over the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games. (24-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +21.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (56-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.2%, +33.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a road cover where the team lost straight up as an underdog, playing with 2 days rest. (24-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +19.4 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES | 75 | | 29-67 | 43.6% | 6-16 | 34.9% | 11-13 | 83.7% | 39 | 7 | 13 | CHICAGO | 88 | | 33-68 | 47.9% | 4-13 | 32.2% | 18-21 | 85.6% | 43 | 9 | 9 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 828 times, while LOS ANGELES won 156 times. Edge against the money line=CHICAGO |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CHICAGO is 74-116 against the money line (-59.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 79.0 | CHICAGO is 20-25 against the money line (-18.5 Units) in home games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 77.1 | CHICAGO is 13-20 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in home games when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 77.3 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 7-19 against the money line (-18.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 81.8 | LOS ANGELES is 37-70 against the money line (-84.6 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 79.6 | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-18.7 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 79.9 | LOS ANGELES is 0-7 against the money line (-8.5 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 64.1, OPPONENT 74.4 | LOS ANGELES is 0-6 against the money line (-7.2 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 67.8, OPPONENT 76.7 | LOS ANGELES is 1-11 against the money line (-11.4 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.9, OPPONENT 79.1 | LOS ANGELES is 5-21 against the money line (-24.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 87.8 | LOS ANGELES is 3-15 against the money line (-17.7 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.1, OPPONENT 91.1 | LOS ANGELES is 2-12 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.5, OPPONENT 77.7 | LOS ANGELES is 2-9 against the money line (-8.6 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 65.6, OPPONENT 72.8 | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-11.3 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.9, OPPONENT 75.2 | LOS ANGELES is 8-18 against the money line (-18.8 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.7, OPPONENT 85.8 | LOS ANGELES is 3-11 against the money line (-12.2 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.7, OPPONENT 81.2 | LOS ANGELES is 7-14 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 79.2 | CHICAGO is 20-5 against the money line (+13.4 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.0, OPPONENT 75.7 | CHICAGO is 12-4 against the money line (+10.3 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 78.1 | CHICAGO is 15-6 against the money line (+9.0 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 78.3 | CHICAGO is 32-17 against the money line (+13.7 Units) in home games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 74.9 | CHICAGO is 23-8 against the money line (+17.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 88.4, OPPONENT 81.8 | CHICAGO is 10-2 against the money line (+8.5 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 92.7, OPPONENT 82.0 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 66-52 against the money line (+17.1 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.6, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 49-34 against the money line (+16.6 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.2, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 35-42 against the money line (-26.2 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-12 against the money line (-8.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 71.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-21 against the money line (-14.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-9 against the money line (-10.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 71.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 3-13 against the money line (-12.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 72.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 111-151 against the money line (-50.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-11 against the money line (-10.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 74.0, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-17 against the money line (-12.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-11 against the money line (-8.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 74.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 17-24 against the money line (-16.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 15-24 against the money line (-21.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-14 against the money line (-19.4 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-13 against the money line (-21.3 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-13 against the money line (-10.4 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-14 against the money line (-12.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-27 against the money line (-25.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-14 against the money line (-11.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.4, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-23 against the money line (-20.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-11 against the money line (-12.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.5, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-16 against the money line (-19.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.4, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 7*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-16 against the money line (-18.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-7.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 25-23 against the money line (-31.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-11 against the money line (-9.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-15 against the money line (-13.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.1, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-22 against the money line (-18.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-16 against the money line (-14.4 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.1, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-13 against the money line (-10.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 23-21 against the money line (-31.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-22 against the money line (-17.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-13 against the money line (-12.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-14 against the money line (-12.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-26 against the money line (-24.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-11 against the money line (-9.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-17 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-13 against the money line (-10.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-23 against the money line (-18.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 20-20 against the money line (-19.8 Units) as a home favorite of -165 to -250 since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-17 against the money line (-15.3 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 87-116 against the money line (-43.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 14-30 against the money line (-25.0 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 4-13 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.5, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 4-17 against the money line (-15.3 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 63-94 against the money line (-44.4 Units) after one or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 29-41 against the money line (-23.6 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-18 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after 3 or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 26-38 against the money line (-26.3 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.7, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-7.6 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 73.9, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 67-116 against the money line (-59.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 49-88 against the money line (-46.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 74-112 against the money line (-43.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 43-73 against the money line (-34.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 26-45 against the money line (-26.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 27-33 against the money line (-20.8 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 42-60 against the money line (-29.0 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 22-38 against the money line (-21.8 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 43-63 against the money line (-29.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-14 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 74.2, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-20 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-12 against the money line (-10.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-20 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.5, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 13-20 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-15 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 43-49 against the money line (-26.7 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 3-14 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in all games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-17 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-24 against the money line (-17.3 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-14 against the money line (-12.7 Units) in July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-14 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in May, June, or July games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-11 against the money line (-12.1 Units) against Eastern conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-9 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after a division game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 67.9, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-10 against the money line (-11.3 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-18 against the money line (-18.2 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-9 against the money line (-8.9 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-8 against the money line (-8.5 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-12.7 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 55% of their shots or better since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-7.0 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.3, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-11 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-11 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-8 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-14 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-15 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-7 against the money line (-6.4 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-7 against the money line (-6.4 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 24-45 against the money line (-22.7 Units) after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-10 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-6 against the money line (-6.2 Units) off a road loss this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-19 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-6 against the money line (-6.6 Units) after allowing 80 points or more this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-12 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-16 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-8 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after playing a game as an underdog this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 67.9, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-6 against the money line (-6.2 Units) after playing a road game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-14 against the money line (-18.6 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-11 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 68.8, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-9 against the money line (-8.7 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-5 against the money line (-8.2 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 3-14 | -12.6 | 5-12 | 9-8 | 70.5 | 35.6 | 43.2% | 39.1 | 76.7 | 35.1 | 43.8% | 39.4 | Road Games | 0-8 | -9.3 | 3-5 | 5-3 | 69.2 | 35.0 | 42.7% | 40.0 | 78.9 | 36.7 | 43.7% | 39.2 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.6 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 66.4 | 33.8 | 45.3% | 37.6 | 70.0 | 35.8 | 39.0% | 39.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.5 | 35.6 | 27-62 | 43.2% | 5-15 | 31.8% | 12-15 | 83.9% | 39 | 7 | 17 | 19 | 5 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 74.6 | 37.6 | 28-66 | 42.0% | 5-15 | 32.6% | 14-18 | 80.0% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 69.2 | 35.0 | 26-62 | 42.7% | 5-16 | 34.4% | 11-13 | 86.1% | 40 | 7 | 17 | 20 | 4 | 15 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.7 | 35.1 | 28-63 | 43.8% | 5-14 | 33.8% | 17-22 | 75.6% | 39 | 8 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 74.6 | 36.9 | 27-65 | 42.0% | 5-15 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 79.0% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.9 | 36.7 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 5-14 | 34.2% | 18-24 | 75.4% | 39 | 7 | 18 | 16 | 9 | 9 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 11-7 | +1.5 | 8-10 | 12-6 | 85.8 | 42.6 | 45.9% | 43.7 | 81.0 | 39.8 | 43.0% | 42.2 | Home Games | 7-1 | +5.2 | 4-4 | 7-1 | 92.1 | 44.9 | 47.8% | 45.5 | 80.9 | 39.5 | 43.7% | 39.4 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 85.6 | 44.6 | 44.4% | 47.8 | 80.8 | 36.0 | 44.6% | 39.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 85.8 | 42.6 | 33-71 | 45.9% | 4-13 | 31.2% | 17-19 | 85.4% | 44 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 7 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.3 | 38 | 28-65 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 32.1% | 15-19 | 80.3% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 92.1 | 44.9 | 34-72 | 47.8% | 5-13 | 36.8% | 19-21 | 87.2% | 45 | 11 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 8 | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.0 | 39.8 | 30-71 | 43.0% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 14-19 | 76.2% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 75.7 | 37.8 | 28-66 | 41.9% | 5-15 | 33.2% | 15-19 | 77.5% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 80.9 | 39.5 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 6-16 | 37.2% | 13-18 | 73.0% | 39 | 9 | 20 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 70.5, CHICAGO 70.6 |
| | |
|
|
6/21/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 68-76 | L | +155 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 37 | 16 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 40 | 8 | 6/23/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 80-84 | L | +450 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 43 | 17 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 32 | 9 | 6/26/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 76-80 | L | +220 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 44 | 19 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 50 | 12 | 6/28/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 70-79 | L | +145 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 39 | 10 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 39 | 9 | 7/2/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 86-81 | W | -250 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 31 | 10 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 34 | 14 | 7/3/2015 | TULSA | 98-95 | W | -220 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 41 | 9 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 40 | 10 | 7/5/2015 | PHOENIX | 91-94 | L | +145 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 42 | 8 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 38 | 4 | 7/8/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 63-70 | L | -175 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 39 | 11 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 45 | 11 | 7/11/2015 | @ TULSA | 67-82 | L | +175 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 42 | 13 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 41 | 5 | 7/15/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 61-68 | L | -155 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 41 | 21 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 31 | 11 | 7/16/2015 | ATLANTA | 72-76 | L | -140 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 38 | 16 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 42 | 15 | 7/21/2015 | PHOENIX | 70-65 | W | +155 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 38 | 10 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 30 | 7 | 7/22/2015 | NEW YORK | 53-59 | L | -120 | 20-63 | 31.7% | 39 | 12 | 17-66 | 25.8% | 62 | 13 | 7/29/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 76-82 | L | +300 | 31-55 | 56.4% | 32 | 21 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 31 | 12 | 7/31/2015 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2015 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/24/2015 | ATLANTA | 100-96 | W | -400 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 49 | 15 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 50 | 13 | 6/26/2015 | @ INDIANA | 83-77 | W | -155 | 32-77 | 41.6% | 43 | 9 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 43 | 18 | 6/28/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 71-86 | L | -105 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 31 | 9 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 40 | 10 | 6/30/2015 | NEW YORK | 81-89 | L | -220 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 39 | 8 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 45 | 12 | 7/2/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 77-74 | W | -175 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 36 | 15 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 14 | 7/10/2015 | MINNESOTA | 90-83 | W | +145 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 40 | 10 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 41 | 9 | 7/12/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 96-76 | W | -360 | 38-67 | 56.7% | 41 | 10 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 30 | 9 | 7/15/2015 | WASHINGTON | 85-57 | W | -220 | 38-83 | 45.8% | 54 | 8 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 44 | 14 | 7/17/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 66-84 | L | +175 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 47 | 12 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 46 | 10 | 7/19/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 93-82 | W | -750 | 40-74 | 54.1% | 43 | 12 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 32 | 9 | 7/21/2015 | ATLANTA | 97-92 | W | -500 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 42 | 15 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 33 | 14 | 7/28/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 87-89 | L | +155 | 33-86 | 38.4% | 53 | 12 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 43 | 13 | 7/31/2015 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2015 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2015 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2015 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES is 11-6 (+3.1 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 2-2 (+0.5 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
LOS ANGELES is 5-4 (+0.6 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 1-1 (+0.5 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/1/2014 | CHICAGO | 90 | 157 | SU ATS | 41 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 45 | 9 | 21 | | LOS ANGELES | 83 | -6.5 | Over | 44 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 31 | 6 | 11 | 6/6/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 102 | 154 | SU ATS | 61 | 43-77 | 55.8% | 3-8 | 37.5% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 38 | 10 | 10 | | CHICAGO | 88 | -3.5 | Over | 44 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 24-26 | 92.3% | 41 | 11 | 17 |
|
| | |
|
Brian is 108-85 against the money line (+32.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 73.0, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 90-68 against the money line (+22.9 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 73.0, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 38-35 against the money line (+16.7 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 69.4, OPPONENT 68.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 127-111 against the money line (+26.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 73.5, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 34-30 against the money line (+15.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 76.5, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 132-102 against the money line (+28.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 73.8, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 58-34 against the money line (+21.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 76.5, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 88-48 against the money line (+40.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 76.8, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 84-75 against the money line (+24.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 74.3, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 16-18 against the money line (-13.9 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 20-35 against the money line (-26.3 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 48-59 against the money line (-31.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 20-35 against the money line (-26.3 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 37-41 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 21-23 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 38-50 against the money line (-28.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 25-40 against the money line (-26.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 42-49 against the money line (-22.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 23-31 against the money line (-18.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 10-20 against the money line (-19.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 29-35 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 27-33 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 8-18 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 13-20 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 28-38 against the money line (-23.2 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 36-42 against the money line (-19.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 13-21 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 18-33 against the money line (-15.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 18-34 against the money line (-22.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 73.0, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 27-54 against the money line (-46.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Pokey is 6-13 against the money line (-9.2 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 73.4, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 8-24 against the money line (-23.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 73.7, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Pokey is 52-53 against the money line (-18.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 63-72 against the money line (-28.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 28-30 against the money line (-20.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 11-28 against the money line (-20.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 73.5, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 21-38 against the money line (-24.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Brian is 3-14 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in all games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 3-14 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 1-9 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after a division game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 67.9, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 2-9 against the money line (-8.9 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 5-23 against the money line (-17.4 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 66.8, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 2-6 against the money line (-11.9 Units) in road games after 2 straight games being called for 5+ more fouls than opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 69.9, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 12-22 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in road games off a road loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 67.2, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 23-31 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 67.0, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 1-8 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 67.9, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 2-11 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 68.8, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 2-9 against the money line (-8.7 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 3-11 against the money line (-9.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 8-2 against the money line (+6.6 Units) in home games after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 8-3 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after a close loss by 3 points or less as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 8-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 82.4, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 51 times, while the road underdog won straight up 26 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 8 times, while the road underdog won straight up 5 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 07/29/2015 - Erin Phillips missed last game, "?" Friday vs. Chicago Sky ( Leg ) | |
[F] 06/15/2015 - Tamera Young out indefinitely ( Thumb ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/18/2024 7:59:59 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|