| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES
First Half Results
CHICAGO |
|
|
80.5
| 39
Final
39 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 607 | LOS ANGELES | 80 | | 608 | CHICAGO | -3 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | | |
|
 - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (LOS ANGELES) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(32-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (78%, +22.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (LOS ANGELES) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(28-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +19.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - playing with 2 days rest, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(93-51 since 1997.) (64.6%, +36.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(40-15 since 1997.) (72.7%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(149-92 since 1997.) (61.8%, +47.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(107-62 since 1997.) (63.3%, +38.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(103-54 since 1997.) (65.6%, +43.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(75-34 since 1997.) (68.8%, +37.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(55-26 since 1997.) (67.9%, +26.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(100-59 since 1997.) (62.9%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(163-104 since 1997.) (61%, +48.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(117-67 since 1997.) (63.6%, +43.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games.
(124-78 since 1997.) (61.4%, +38.2 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(77-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.7%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(51-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.9%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (LOS ANGELES) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(31-11 since 1997.) (73.8%, +18.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (LOS ANGELES) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(45-21 since 1997.) (68.2%, +21.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(128-78 since 1997.) (62.1%, +42.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(77-35 since 1997.) (68.8%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(92-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (63%, +32.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(56-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.1%, +28.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in July games.
(470-346 since 1997.) (57.6%, +89.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(143-90 since 1997.) (61.4%, +44 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(124-70 since 1997.) (63.9%, +47 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(124-70 since 1997.) (63.9%, +47 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(124-70 since 1997.) (63.9%, +47 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(147-94 since 1997.) (61%, +43.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(127-71 since 1997.) (64.1%, +48.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(89-52 since 1997.) (63.1%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(127-71 since 1997.) (64.1%, +48.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(127-71 since 1997.) (64.1%, +48.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(89-52 since 1997.) (63.1%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(89-52 since 1997.) (63.1%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(464-321 since 1997.) (59.1%, +110.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(349-227 since 1997.) (60.6%, +99.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(462-336 since 1997.) (57.9%, +92.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(219-142 since 1997.) (60.7%, +62.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(152-93 since 1997.) (62%, +49.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(349-249 since 1997.) (58.4%, +75.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(180-118 since 1997.) (60.4%, +50.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(131-81 since 1997.) (61.8%, +41.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more.
(74-36 since 1997.) (67.3%, +34.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season, in July games.
(130-78 since 1997.) (62.5%, +44.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off a road loss, in July games.
(138-76 since 1997.) (64.5%, +54.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - averaging 42 or more rebounds/game on the season, after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more.
(54-26 since 1997.) (67.5%, +25.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, in July games.
(229-156 since 1997.) (59.5%, +57.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in July games.
(470-346 since 1997.) (57.6%, +89.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(640-476 since 1997.) (57.3%, +116.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(143-90 since 1997.) (61.4%, +44 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(124-70 since 1997.) (63.9%, +47 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(69-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(124-70 since 1997.) (63.9%, +47 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(124-70 since 1997.) (63.9%, +47 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(155-99 since 1997.) (61%, +46.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(464-321 since 1997.) (59.1%, +110.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(349-227 since 1997.) (60.6%, +99.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(309-220 since 1997.) (58.4%, +67 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in July games.
(111-69 since 1997.) (61.7%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(186-128 since 1997.) (59.2%, +45.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games.
(234-161 since 1997.) (59.2%, +56.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(142-94 since 1997.) (60.2%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games.
(169-106 since 1997.) (61.5%, +52.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(97-56 since 1997.) (63.4%, +35.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games.
(223-155 since 1997.) (59%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in July games.
(89-49 since 1997.) (64.5%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in May, June, or July games.
(121-81 since 1997.) (59.9%, +31.9 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games.
(177-121 since 1997.) (59.4%, +43.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(770-565 since 1997.) (57.7%, +148.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(191-124 since 1997.) (60.6%, +54.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(303-213 since 1997.) (58.7%, +68.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| LOS ANGELES | 75 | | 38 | | 29-67 | 43.6% | 6-16 | 34.9% | 11-13 | 83.7% | 39 | 7 | 13 | | CHICAGO | 88 | | 45 | | 33-68 | 47.9% | 4-13 | 32.2% | 18-21 | 85.6% | 43 | 9 | 9 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO covered the first half line 619 times, while LOS ANGELES covered the first half line 336 times.
Edge against first half line=CHICAGO | In 1000 simulated games, 580 games went over first half total, while 382 games went under first half total.
Edge against first half total=Over |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 20-36 against the 1rst half line (-19.6 Units) in road games when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.4, OPPONENT 39.6 | LOS ANGELES is 7-19 against the 1rst half line (-13.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.2, OPPONENT 42.4 | CHICAGO is 90-44 against the 1rst half line (+41.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.9, OPPONENT 38.2 | CHICAGO is 59-25 against the 1rst half line (+31.5 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.2, OPPONENT 38.7 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 20-9 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.2, OPPONENT 43.2 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 98-59 UNDER (+33.1 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 34.3 | LOS ANGELES is 78-54 UNDER (+18.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 36.2 | LOS ANGELES is 196-156 UNDER (+24.4 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 34.9 |
|
| | |
|
| LOS ANGELES | | | | CHICAGO | -5 |  |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 12-24 against the 1rst half line (-14.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.7, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-16 against the 1rst half line (-11.6 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 1-9 against the 1rst half line (-8.9 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.9, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.0, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 13-3 OVER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.4, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.8, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 26-11 OVER (+13.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 34-17 OVER (+15.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 27-16 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.5, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 116-85 UNDER (+22.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.2, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 116-82 UNDER (+25.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.0, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 71-49 UNDER (+17.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.5, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 100-71 UNDER (+21.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 198-155 UNDER (+27.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 142-102 UNDER (+29.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.0, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 80-55 UNDER (+19.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.1, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 58-32 UNDER (+22.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.6, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 73-50 UNDER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 123-78 UNDER (+37.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 165-128 UNDER (+24.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.7, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.1, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.3, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 12-23 against the 1rst half line (-13.3 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-11 against the 1rst half line (-10.1 Units) in home games after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) in home games after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-34 against the 1rst half line (-16.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-25 against the 1rst half line (-17.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 20-33 against the 1rst half line (-16.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 12-27 against the 1rst half line (-17.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-31 against the 1rst half line (-16.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-18 against the 1rst half line (-12.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.3, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-20 against the 1rst half line (-13.0 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.0, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 16-31 against the 1rst half line (-18.1 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 15-38 against the 1rst half line (-26.8 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 32.8, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 55% of their shots or better since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 32.8, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-12 against the 1rst half line (-11.2 Units) after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ less free throws than opponent since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 32.6, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 18-8 against the 1rst half line (+9.2 Units) in July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.8, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-3 OVER (+6.7 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.1, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-5 OVER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.2, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 12-3 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.9, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.9, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 70.5 this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.9, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-2 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games on Friday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-4 OVER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 22-12 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 36-19 OVER (+15.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.7, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 23-7 OVER (+15.3 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.5, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-8 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 26-12 OVER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.7, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 14-4 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.6, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 21-8 OVER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 7-0 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.3, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.5, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-5 OVER (+15.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 22-6 OVER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.4, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.1, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 22-9 OVER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 16-6 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 17-5 OVER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 22-12 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 14-4 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 17-8 OVER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-2 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 24-7 OVER (+16.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 14-3 OVER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.3, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-4 OVER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.2, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 18-7 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-6 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.1, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-10 OVER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.3, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-7 OVER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 24-9 OVER (+14.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 18-7 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 356-299 UNDER (+27.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 186-141 UNDER (+30.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.3, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 157-115 UNDER (+30.5 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 58-36 UNDER (+18.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in July games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 231-181 UNDER (+31.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.5, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 150-117 UNDER (+21.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.5, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 178-131 UNDER (+33.9 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.4, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 36-20 UNDER (+14.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.7, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 117-88 UNDER (+20.2 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-9 UNDER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.2, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.2, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 30-17 UNDER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.0, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 116-75 UNDER (+33.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 113-79 UNDER (+26.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 135-102 UNDER (+22.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.0, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 177-130 UNDER (+34.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.1, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 3-14 | -12.6 | 5-12 | 9-8 | 70.5 | 35.6 | 43.2% | 39.1 | 76.7 | 35.1 | 43.8% | 39.4 | | Road Games | 0-8 | -9.3 | 3-5 | 5-3 | 69.2 | 35.0 | 42.7% | 40.0 | 78.9 | 36.7 | 43.7% | 39.2 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.6 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 66.4 | 33.8 | 45.3% | 37.6 | 70.0 | 35.8 | 39.0% | 39.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 70.5 | 35.6 | 27-62 | 43.2% | 5-15 | 31.8% | 12-15 | 83.9% | 39 | 7 | 17 | 19 | 5 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 74.6 | 37.6 | 28-66 | 42.0% | 5-15 | 32.6% | 14-18 | 80.0% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 69.2 | 35.0 | 26-62 | 42.7% | 5-16 | 34.4% | 11-13 | 86.1% | 40 | 7 | 17 | 20 | 4 | 15 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.7 | 35.1 | 28-63 | 43.8% | 5-14 | 33.8% | 17-22 | 75.6% | 39 | 8 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 74.6 | 36.9 | 27-65 | 42.0% | 5-15 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 79.0% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.9 | 36.7 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 5-14 | 34.2% | 18-24 | 75.4% | 39 | 7 | 18 | 16 | 9 | 9 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 11-7 | +1.5 | 8-10 | 12-6 | 85.8 | 42.6 | 45.9% | 43.7 | 81.0 | 39.8 | 43.0% | 42.2 | | Home Games | 7-1 | +5.2 | 4-4 | 7-1 | 92.1 | 44.9 | 47.8% | 45.5 | 80.9 | 39.5 | 43.7% | 39.4 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 85.6 | 44.6 | 44.4% | 47.8 | 80.8 | 36.0 | 44.6% | 39.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 85.8 | 42.6 | 33-71 | 45.9% | 4-13 | 31.2% | 17-19 | 85.4% | 44 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 7 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75.3 | 38 | 28-65 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 32.1% | 15-19 | 80.3% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 92.1 | 44.9 | 34-72 | 47.8% | 5-13 | 36.8% | 19-21 | 87.2% | 45 | 11 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 8 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.0 | 39.8 | 30-71 | 43.0% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 14-19 | 76.2% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.7 | 37.8 | 28-66 | 41.9% | 5-15 | 33.2% | 15-19 | 77.5% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 80.9 | 39.5 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 6-16 | 37.2% | 13-18 | 73.0% | 39 | 9 | 20 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 70.5, CHICAGO 70.6 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/21/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 68-76 | 40-30 | 2 | W | 67 | O | 25-59 | 42.4% | 37 | 16 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 40 | 8 | | 6/23/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 80-84 | 37-39 | 6.5 | W | 68 | O | 34-68 | 50.0% | 43 | 17 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 32 | 9 | | 6/26/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 76-80 | 32-26 | 3.5 | W | 70 | U | 29-66 | 43.9% | 44 | 19 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 50 | 12 | | 6/28/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 70-79 | 38-41 | 2 | L | 70 | O | 22-60 | 36.7% | 39 | 10 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 39 | 9 | | 7/2/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 86-81 | 38-40 | -3 | L | 74 | O | 31-62 | 50.0% | 31 | 10 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 34 | 14 | | 7/3/2015 | TULSA | 98-95 | 42-42 | -3 | L | 73.5 | O | 33-63 | 52.4% | 41 | 9 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 40 | 10 | | 7/5/2015 | PHOENIX | 91-94 | 46-42 | 2 | W | 76.5 | O | 33-71 | 46.5% | 42 | 8 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 38 | 4 | | 7/8/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 63-70 | 38-35 | -2 | W | 76.5 | U | 24-69 | 34.8% | 39 | 11 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 45 | 11 | | 7/11/2015 | @ TULSA | 67-82 | 31-40 | 2.5 | L | 78 | U | 24-61 | 39.3% | 42 | 13 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 41 | 5 | | 7/15/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 61-68 | 37-35 | -1.5 | W | 72.5 | U | 25-51 | 49.0% | 41 | 21 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 31 | 11 | | 7/16/2015 | ATLANTA | 72-76 | 35-35 | -1.5 | L | 75 | U | 27-62 | 43.5% | 38 | 16 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 42 | 15 | | 7/21/2015 | PHOENIX | 70-65 | 38-35 | 2 | W | 74 | U | 27-56 | 48.2% | 38 | 10 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 30 | 7 | | 7/22/2015 | NEW YORK | 53-59 | 24-31 | -1 | L | 72.5 | U | 20-63 | 31.7% | 39 | 12 | 17-66 | 25.8% | 62 | 13 | | 7/29/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 76-82 | 35-43 | 5 | L | 73 | O | 31-55 | 56.4% | 32 | 21 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 31 | 12 | | 7/31/2015 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2015 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/24/2015 | ATLANTA | 100-96 | 40-34 | -5 | W | 79 | U | 30-72 | 41.7% | 49 | 15 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 50 | 13 | | 6/26/2015 | @ INDIANA | 83-77 | 43-52 | -1.5 | L | 81.5 | O | 32-77 | 41.6% | 43 | 9 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 43 | 18 | | 6/28/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 71-86 | 34-43 | 0.5 | L | 75.5 | O | 31-65 | 47.7% | 31 | 9 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 40 | 10 | | 6/30/2015 | NEW YORK | 81-89 | 36-48 | -3 | L | 74.5 | O | 28-71 | 39.4% | 39 | 8 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 45 | 12 | | 7/2/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 77-74 | 38-42 | -2 | L | 75.5 | O | 29-62 | 46.8% | 36 | 15 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 14 | | 7/10/2015 | MINNESOTA | 90-83 | 38-40 | 2 | T | 76.5 | O | 32-63 | 50.8% | 40 | 10 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 41 | 9 | | 7/12/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 96-76 | 49-41 | -4.5 | W | 77.5 | O | 38-67 | 56.7% | 41 | 10 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 30 | 9 | | 7/15/2015 | WASHINGTON | 85-57 | 51-32 | -3 | W | 78 | O | 38-83 | 45.8% | 54 | 8 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 44 | 14 | | 7/17/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 66-84 | 34-34 | 2.5 | W | 76.5 | U | 26-73 | 35.6% | 47 | 12 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 46 | 10 | | 7/19/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 93-82 | 50-35 | -6.5 | W | 76.5 | O | 40-74 | 54.1% | 43 | 12 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 32 | 9 | | 7/21/2015 | ATLANTA | 97-92 | 44-48 | -5.5 | L | 80.5 | O | 32-65 | 49.2% | 42 | 15 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 33 | 14 | | 7/28/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 87-89 | 44-31 | 2 | W | 79 | U | 33-86 | 38.4% | 53 | 12 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 43 | 13 | | 7/31/2015 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2015 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2015 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2015 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| LOS ANGELES is 10-8 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO since 1997 | | 9 of 17 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 3-1 versus the first half line when playing against LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 4 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 5-4 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO since 1997 | | 4 of 8 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 1-1 versus the first half line when playing against LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/1/2014 | CHICAGO | 90 | 157 | SU ATS | 41 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 45 | 9 | 21 | | | LOS ANGELES | 83 | -6.5 | Over | 44 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 31 | 6 | 11 | 6/6/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 102 | 154 | SU ATS | 61 | 43-77 | 55.8% | 3-8 | 37.5% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 38 | 10 | 10 | | | CHICAGO | 88 | -3.5 | Over | 44 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 24-26 | 92.3% | 41 | 11 | 17 |
|
| | |
|
Brian is 57-37 against the 1rst half line (+16.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.5, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 26-13 against the 1rst half line (+11.7 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.9, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 72-91 against the 1rst half line (-28.1 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 39-53 against the 1rst half line (-19.3 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 23-42 against the 1rst half line (-23.2 Units) as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 12-22 against the 1rst half line (-12.2 Units) as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.4, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 29-49 against the 1rst half line (-24.9 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 28-49 against the 1rst half line (-25.9 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 21-34 against the 1rst half line (-16.4 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 19-33 against the 1rst half line (-17.3 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 7-17 against the 1rst half line (-11.7 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 25-40 against the 1rst half line (-19.0 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.1, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 16-28 against the 1rst half line (-14.8 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 10-19 against the 1rst half line (-10.9 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 1-9 against the 1rst half line (-8.9 Units) in home games after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 37-51 against the 1rst half line (-19.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 40-53 against the 1rst half line (-18.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 20-35 against the 1rst half line (-18.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.9, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 10-20 against the 1rst half line (-12.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.6, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 35-49 against the 1rst half line (-18.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 22-39 against the 1rst half line (-20.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 37-49 against the 1rst half line (-16.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 26-41 against the 1rst half line (-19.1 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.0, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 19-34 against the 1rst half line (-18.4 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.6, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 28-51 against the 1rst half line (-28.1 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.1, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 30-46 against the 1rst half line (-20.6 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 16-28 against the 1rst half line (-14.8 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 12-24 against the 1rst half line (-14.4 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.5, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.8, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 25-42 against the 1rst half line (-21.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.3, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 43-61 against the 1rst half line (-24.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.5, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 34-50 against the 1rst half line (-21.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.3, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 58-76 against the 1rst half line (-25.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 9-24 against the 1rst half line (-17.4 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.1, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 19-36 against the 1rst half line (-20.6 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 14-24 against the 1rst half line (-12.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.2, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Pokey is 26-16 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) in July games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Pokey is 92-71 OVER (+13.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 51-39 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 56-42 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 33-21 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 61-45 OVER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 51-38 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 49-36 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 49-31 OVER (+14.9 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 35-20 OVER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 29-16 OVER (+11.4 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 20-9 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 52-35 OVER (+13.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 41-22 OVER (+16.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 32-18 OVER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 52-40 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 19-10 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.6, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 40-25 OVER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 31-19 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 21-6 OVER (+14.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 52-32 OVER (+16.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 40-21 OVER (+16.9 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 51-37 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 31-19 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 37-24 OVER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 48-26 OVER (+19.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 22-12 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 30-15 OVER (+13.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 27-15 OVER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.7, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 62-43 OVER (+14.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.5, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 78-57 OVER (+15.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Brian is 243-135 UNDER (+94.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.1, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 122-67 UNDER (+48.3 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.4, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 97-50 UNDER (+42.0 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.1, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 62-28 UNDER (+31.2 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.7, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 40-13 UNDER (+25.7 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 31.9, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 124-63 UNDER (+54.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.6, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 81-50 UNDER (+26.0 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.7, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 75-38 UNDER (+33.2 Units) the 1rst half total in July games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.3, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 163-86 UNDER (+68.4 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.7, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 88-45 UNDER (+38.5 Units) the 1rst half total against Eastern conference opponents in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.0, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 149-85 UNDER (+55.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.9, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 65-37 UNDER (+24.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.6, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 113-78 UNDER (+27.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.6, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 123-78 UNDER (+37.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.6, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 55% of their shots or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.0, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 104-57 UNDER (+41.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.9, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 47-26 UNDER (+18.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.6, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 88-45 UNDER (+38.5 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.0, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 29-12 UNDER (+15.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.4, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 113-47 UNDER (+61.3 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.2, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 17-6 UNDER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games being called for 5+ more fouls than opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.3, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 77-38 UNDER (+35.2 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.7, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 46-26 UNDER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.0, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 25-12 UNDER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.1, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 62-35 UNDER (+23.5 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.7, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 21-9 UNDER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.3, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 32-15 UNDER (+15.5 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.1, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 89-43 UNDER (+41.7 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.6, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 79-33 UNDER (+42.7 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.1, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 48-22 UNDER (+23.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.8, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 75-34 UNDER (+37.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.8, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 19-8 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.9, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 91-47 UNDER (+39.3 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.2, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 55-25 UNDER (+27.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.4, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 39-14 UNDER (+23.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a loss by 6 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.7, OPPONENT 32.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 87-54 UNDER (+27.6 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.5, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 65-32 UNDER (+29.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.5, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 113-63 UNDER (+43.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.9, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 90-46 UNDER (+39.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.8, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 120-55 UNDER (+59.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.4, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 112-64 UNDER (+41.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.9, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 121-54 UNDER (+61.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.9, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 61-28 UNDER (+30.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.8, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 46-17 UNDER (+27.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.9, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 108-62 UNDER (+39.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.3, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 56-36 UNDER (+16.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.6, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 91-65 UNDER (+19.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.9, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 141-97 UNDER (+34.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.8, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 100-66 UNDER (+27.4 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 26-13 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 39-23 UNDER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.4, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 79-50 UNDER (+24.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.2, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 123-77 UNDER (+38.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.8, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 118-69 UNDER (+42.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.3, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 187-103 UNDER (+73.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.0, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 62-38 UNDER (+20.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.8, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 92-62 UNDER (+23.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.7, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 92-66 UNDER (+19.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.0, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 143-90 UNDER (+44.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.7, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 81-57 UNDER (+18.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 37.0, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 39-23 UNDER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.1, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 65-38 UNDER (+23.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.7, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 91-61 UNDER (+23.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 135-87 UNDER (+39.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.5, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 92-63 UNDER (+22.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.2, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 66-42 UNDER (+19.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.6, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 45 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 31 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 9 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 4 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 8 games went under the first half total, while 7 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 6 games went over the first half total, while 3 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 7 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 5 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 1 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 0 times. | | Since 1997, 6 games went over the first half total, while 6 games went under the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 1 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
| [G] 07/29/2015 - Erin Phillips missed last game, "?" Friday vs. Chicago Sky ( Leg ) | |
| [F] 06/15/2015 - Tamera Young out indefinitely ( Thumb ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/18/2024 4:40:55 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|