| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
MINNESOTA
First Half Results
TULSA |
|
|
74.5
| 45
Final
39 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 651 | MINNESOTA | -2.5 | | 652 | TULSA | 74 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | | |
|
 - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(113-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.4%, +38.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(51-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.9%, +30.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(178-113 since 1997.) (61.2%, +53.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after failing to cover the spread in 4 or more consecutive games against opponent after a game where they covered the spread.
(81-42 since 1997.) (65.9%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(32-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (78%, +22.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(106-59 since 1997.) (64.2%, +41.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(139-79 since 1997.) (63.8%, +52.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(109-62 since 1997.) (63.7%, +40.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(73-38 since 1997.) (65.8%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(34-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.3%, +19.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(43-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.9%, +25.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, extremely tired team - when playing their 3rd game in 4 days.
(40-16 since 1997.) (71.4%, +22.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(114-66 since 1997.) (63.3%, +41.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - vs. division opponents.
(980-763 since 1997.) (56.2%, +140.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after a division game against opponent after a non-conference game.
(382-270 since 1997.) (58.6%, +85 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(90-53 since 1997.) (62.9%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(90-53 since 1997.) (62.9%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(90-53 since 1997.) (62.9%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(801-573 since 1997.) (58.3%, +170.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(207-128 since 1997.) (61.8%, +66.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points.
(593-438 since 1997.) (57.5%, +111.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(573-402 since 1997.) (58.8%, +130.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, poor shooting team - shooting <=40% on the season.
(92-52 since 1997.) (63.9%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (TULSA) - after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games against opponent after having won 3 of their last 4 games.
(46-19 since 1997.) (70.8%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents.
(980-763 since 1997.) (56.2%, +140.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents, after a non-conference game.
(291-193 since 1997.) (60.1%, +78.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a non-conference game.
(622-455 since 1997.) (57.8%, +121.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(55-26 since 1997.) (67.9%, +26.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(161-108 since 1997.) (59.9%, +42.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(349-242 since 1997.) (59.1%, +82.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning record on the season.
(315-219 since 1997.) (59%, +74.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games.
(271-182 since 1997.) (59.8%, +70.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning record on the season.
(258-172 since 1997.) (60%, +68.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season.
(705-523 since 1997.) (57.4%, +129.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(471-347 since 1997.) (57.6%, +89.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a win by 10 points or more.
(407-285 since 1997.) (58.8%, +93.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game.
(214-145 since 1997.) (59.6%, +54.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after a win by 10 points or more.
(275-194 since 1997.) (58.6%, +61.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(771-566 since 1997.) (57.7%, +148.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(192-125 since 1997.) (60.6%, +54.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(390-261 since 1997.) (59.9%, +102.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(258-162 since 1997.) (61.4%, +79.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(208-142 since 1997.) (59.4%, +51.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(146-87 since 1997.) (62.7%, +50.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(814-586 since 1997.) (58.1%, +169.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(467-323 since 1997.) (59.1%, +111.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(303-206 since 1997.) (59.5%, +76.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(244-166 since 1997.) (59.5%, +61.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(167-105 since 1997.) (61.4%, +51.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(330-231 since 1997.) (58.8%, +75.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| MINNESOTA | 77 | | 39 | | 30-66 | 45.3% | 4-12 | 34.6% | 14-16 | 83.2% | 45 | 8 | 14 | | TULSA | 74 | | 37 | | 27-71 | 38.0% | 7-20 | 34.2% | 14-17 | 78.7% | 44 | 11 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, TULSA covered the first half line 553 times, while MINNESOTA covered the first half line 447 times.
No Edge. | In 1000 simulated games, 575 games went over first half total, while 384 games went under first half total.
Edge against first half total=Over |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 73-47 against the 1rst half line (+21.3 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.6, OPPONENT 32.2 | TULSA is 1-9 against the 1rst half line (-8.9 Units) in home games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.9, OPPONENT 41.9 |
|
MINNESOTA is 56-81 against the 1rst half line (-33.1 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.9, OPPONENT 36.3 | TULSA is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots this season.
The average score was TULSA 40.8, OPPONENT 37.3 | TULSA is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 44.3, OPPONENT 36.2 |
|
MINNESOTA is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.7, OPPONENT 42.7 | MINNESOTA is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 44.8, OPPONENT 39.4 | MINNESOTA is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.7, OPPONENT 40.6 | MINNESOTA is 16-5 OVER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.0, OPPONENT 43.1 | TULSA is 24-11 OVER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 39.9, OPPONENT 42.7 |
|
MINNESOTA is 87-31 UNDER (+52.9 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.6, OPPONENT 32.2 | MINNESOTA is 83-52 UNDER (+25.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.3, OPPONENT 36.1 | MINNESOTA is 101-72 UNDER (+21.8 Units) the 1rst half total in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.2, OPPONENT 35.8 | MINNESOTA is 171-124 UNDER (+34.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.1, OPPONENT 35.6 | MINNESOTA is 109-74 UNDER (+27.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.2, OPPONENT 35.8 | MINNESOTA is 174-118 UNDER (+44.2 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.8, OPPONENT 35.3 |
|
| | | | |
|
TULSA is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.5, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 3-13 against the 1rst half line (-11.3 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.1, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 36-56 against the 1rst half line (-25.6 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.1, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 54-77 against the 1rst half line (-30.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.9, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 72-110 against the 1rst half line (-49.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 16-5 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 38.5, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) in home games versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 39.7, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 166-104 UNDER (+51.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.8, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 99-58 UNDER (+35.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.0, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 117-76 UNDER (+33.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.8, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 171-116 UNDER (+43.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.8, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 98-66 UNDER (+25.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.2, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 146-99 UNDER (+37.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.1, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 29-15 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.3, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 45-24 UNDER (+18.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.7, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 106-68 UNDER (+31.2 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.4, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 154-99 UNDER (+45.1 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.5, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 185-127 UNDER (+45.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.7, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 274-186 UNDER (+69.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.5, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 37-20 UNDER (+15.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 58-37 UNDER (+17.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.4, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 25-11 UNDER (+12.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.5, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 74-43 UNDER (+26.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.2, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 82-49 UNDER (+28.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.9, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 35-22 UNDER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.3, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 15-5 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.4, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.5, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) in home games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.7, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 8-20 against the 1rst half line (-14.0 Units) in home games after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 36.2, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 4-15 against the 1rst half line (-12.5 Units) in home games off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 36.9, OPPONENT 45.5 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 20-36 against the 1rst half line (-19.6 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 37.7, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 17-34 against the 1rst half line (-20.4 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 37.6, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.4, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 6-17 against the 1rst half line (-12.7 Units) in home games after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 37.7, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 1-9 against the 1rst half line (-8.9 Units) in road games after a cover as a double digit favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.8, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 78-107 against the 1rst half line (-39.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.7, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 33-53 against the 1rst half line (-25.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.2, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 121-167 against the 1rst half line (-62.7 Units) after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.5, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 128-169 against the 1rst half line (-57.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.3, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 70-97 against the 1rst half line (-36.7 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.7, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 14-4 against the 1rst half line (+9.6 Units) versus the first half line in all games this season.
The average score was TULSA 41.4, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.4, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 7-0 against the 1rst half line (+7.0 Units) as a home underdog of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 43.3, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 11-2 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.9, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 3*) | TULSA is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was TULSA 42.7, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 3*) | TULSA is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) after playing a game as an underdog this season.
The average score was TULSA 43.9, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.6, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.6, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 16-6 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 70.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.0, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 9-1 OVER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.3, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 21-7 OVER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a cover as a double digit favorite since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.6, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.1, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.3, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.3, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 22-11 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 40.3, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 11-2 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a home loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 41.3, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 16-4 OVER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 40.6, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 3*) | TULSA is 11-2 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 40.5, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 332-241 UNDER (+66.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.9, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 108-70 UNDER (+31.0 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.9, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 220-147 UNDER (+58.3 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.7, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 120-78 UNDER (+34.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.9, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 91-62 UNDER (+22.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.0, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 164-123 UNDER (+28.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.1, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 167-107 UNDER (+49.3 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.0, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 73-44 UNDER (+24.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.1, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 116-85 UNDER (+22.5 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.7, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 114-70 UNDER (+37.0 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.2, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 80-47 UNDER (+28.3 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.6, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 142-107 UNDER (+24.3 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.3, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 109-81 UNDER (+19.9 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.7, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 179-130 UNDER (+36.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.3, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 172-110 UNDER (+51.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.5, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 179-115 UNDER (+52.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.3, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 33-19 UNDER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.6, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 38-22 UNDER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 37.5, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 14-4 | -0.1 | 10-8 | 8-10 | 78.4 | 37.7 | 45.5% | 41.7 | 69.9 | 34.7 | 40.6% | 38.6 | | Road Games | 6-2 | +0.8 | 4-4 | 3-5 | 76.0 | 36.2 | 45.7% | 39.7 | 71.9 | 37.2 | 42.3% | 37.9 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | -0.6 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 81.6 | 36.6 | 43.7% | 43.4 | 72.4 | 33.4 | 42.4% | 39.8 | | Division Games | 10-2 | +2.1 | 7-5 | 4-8 | 76.5 | 37.2 | 46.9% | 40.1 | 67.2 | 35.1 | 39.4% | 37.1 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 78.4 | 37.7 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 4-12 | 35.2% | 14-17 | 82.7% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 16 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 76.7 | 38.1 | 28-66 | 43.3% | 5-14 | 33.2% | 15-19 | 78.2% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 76.0 | 36.2 | 29-63 | 45.7% | 3-11 | 28.7% | 15-18 | 84.4% | 40 | 8 | 17 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.9 | 34.7 | 27-66 | 40.6% | 6-18 | 32.3% | 11-13 | 82.5% | 39 | 7 | 16 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.3 | 37.6 | 28-66 | 42.1% | 5-16 | 33.0% | 15-18 | 79.8% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 71.9 | 37.2 | 27-64 | 42.3% | 6-19 | 34.2% | 11-15 | 76.9% | 38 | 7 | 15 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 10-9 | +2.2 | 10-7 | 7-12 | 77.5 | 41.4 | 38.3% | 45.3 | 75.6 | 36.5 | 43.8% | 41.4 | | Home Games | 6-3 | +2.4 | 4-4 | 2-7 | 78.9 | 43.4 | 39.1% | 45.7 | 72.2 | 33.0 | 42.3% | 37.7 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -6.6 | 0-4 | 1-4 | 69.0 | 38.8 | 34.1% | 47.4 | 76.2 | 36.0 | 45.3% | 43.2 | | Division Games | 6-7 | -0.3 | 7-6 | 3-10 | 75.4 | 38.9 | 37.9% | 45.6 | 74.2 | 34.0 | 43.6% | 41.3 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 77.5 | 41.4 | 27-70 | 38.3% | 7-20 | 34.4% | 17-22 | 78.3% | 45 | 12 | 14 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 74.9 | 37.6 | 28-66 | 42.3% | 5-15 | 32.8% | 14-18 | 78.6% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 78.9 | 43.4 | 26-68 | 39.1% | 7-20 | 36.2% | 19-23 | 82.5% | 46 | 11 | 15 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.6 | 36.5 | 28-63 | 43.8% | 4-14 | 32.3% | 16-20 | 79.1% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 74.6 | 36.9 | 28-64 | 43.1% | 5-14 | 32.8% | 15-18 | 80.1% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 72.2 | 33.0 | 26-61 | 42.3% | 5-14 | 34.4% | 16-18 | 84.8% | 38 | 7 | 15 | 22 | 7 | 14 | 6 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 69.7, TULSA 70.8 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/25/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 76-73 | 42-51 | -6 | L | 72 | O | 29-64 | 45.3% | 40 | 14 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 36 | 17 | | 6/27/2015 | PHOENIX | 71-56 | 37-23 | -3.5 | W | 74 | U | 27-64 | 42.2% | 40 | 12 | 19-57 | 33.3% | 42 | 20 | | 7/3/2015 | SEATTLE | 82-57 | 34-33 | -7.5 | L | 73 | U | 33-64 | 51.6% | 42 | 13 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 28 | 12 | | 7/10/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 83-90 | 40-38 | -2 | T | 76.5 | O | 34-78 | 43.6% | 41 | 9 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 40 | 10 | | 7/12/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 66-49 | 39-26 | -9 | W | 73.5 | U | 29-70 | 41.4% | 44 | 10 | 20-69 | 29.0% | 49 | 13 | | 7/14/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 85-79 | 42-40 | -3.5 | L | 72 | O | 32-63 | 50.8% | 34 | 15 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 14 | | 7/17/2015 | CHICAGO | 84-66 | 34-34 | -2.5 | L | 76.5 | U | 33-74 | 44.6% | 46 | 10 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 47 | 12 | | 7/19/2015 | @ TULSA | 79-72 | 27-34 | -1.5 | L | 74.5 | U | 28-61 | 45.9% | 41 | 11 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 38 | 13 | | 7/22/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 77-78 | 32-35 | -4.5 | L | 72.5 | U | 29-75 | 38.7% | 50 | 16 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 42 | 15 | | 7/29/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 82-76 | 43-35 | -5 | W | 73 | O | 29-61 | 47.5% | 31 | 12 | 31-55 | 56.4% | 32 | 21 | | 7/31/2015 | ATLANTA | 86-70 | 47-29 | -8 | W | 76.5 | U | 33-77 | 42.9% | 49 | 15 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 40 | 19 | | 8/1/2015 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2015 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2015 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/26/2015 | NEW YORK | 71-62 | 45-41 | -5 | L | 74.5 | O | 21-62 | 33.9% | 34 | 13 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 44 | 26 | | 6/28/2015 | SEATTLE | 93-89 | 45-42 | -7 | L | 74 | O | 29-65 | 44.6% | 43 | 13 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 30 | 9 | | 6/30/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 69-74 | 40-32 | -1.5 | W | 74 | U | 23-65 | 35.4% | 43 | 10 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 42 | 9 | | 7/2/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 55-86 | 29-47 | 4 | L | 73.5 | O | 20-71 | 28.2% | 43 | 13 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 43 | 13 | | 7/3/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 95-98 | 42-42 | 3 | W | 73.5 | O | 32-71 | 45.1% | 40 | 10 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 41 | 9 | | 7/7/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 85-75 | 48-41 | 2.5 | W | 75 | O | 25-63 | 39.7% | 48 | 18 | 31-80 | 38.7% | 54 | 17 | | 7/11/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 82-67 | 40-31 | -2.5 | W | 78 | U | 26-69 | 37.7% | 41 | 5 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 42 | 13 | | 7/15/2015 | @ INDIANA | 80-83 | 45-52 | 1.5 | L | 79 | O | 30-75 | 40.0% | 48 | 12 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 50 | 13 | | 7/17/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 58-65 | 35-32 | -2.5 | W | 74.5 | U | 21-68 | 30.9% | 45 | 11 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 54 | 15 | | 7/19/2015 | MINNESOTA | 72-79 | 34-27 | 1.5 | W | 74.5 | U | 25-64 | 39.1% | 38 | 13 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 41 | 11 | | 7/21/2015 | WASHINGTON | 69-76 | 40-38 | -2 | T | 74 | O | 23-73 | 31.5% | 60 | 14 | 25-56 | 44.6% | 31 | 8 | | 7/30/2015 | PHOENIX | 66-78 | 40-31 | 1 | W | 75.5 | U | 21-72 | 29.2% | 46 | 12 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 40 | 16 | | 8/1/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2015 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/15/2015 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| MINNESOTA is 23-22 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA since 1997 | | 24 of 44 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| TULSA is 8-4 versus the first half line when playing against MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons | | 6 of 12 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| MINNESOTA is 12-10 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA since 1997 | | 13 of 22 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| TULSA is 3-3 versus the first half line when playing against MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 6 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/19/2015 | MINNESOTA | 79 | -3 | SU ATS | 27 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 41 | 8 | 11 | | | TULSA | 72 | 152 | Under | 34 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 9-23 | 39.1% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 38 | 6 | 13 | 6/21/2015 | TULSA | 86 | 157.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 44 | 14 | 11 | | | MINNESOTA | 78 | -7.5 | Over | 38 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 16-17 | 94.1% | 32 | 8 | 16 | 6/5/2015 | TULSA | 75 | 162.5 | ATS | 44 | 28-79 | 35.4% | 7-24 | 29.2% | 12-12 | 100.0% | 38 | 9 | 6 | | | MINNESOTA | 83 | -10.5 | SU Under | 45 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 5-13 | 38.5% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 53 | 10 | 16 | 8/16/2014 | TULSA | 63 | 163 | Under | 43 | 23-73 | 31.5% | 6-26 | 23.1% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 44 | 13 | 15 | | | MINNESOTA | 80 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 37 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 18-25 | 72.0% | 60 | 18 | 11 | 8/2/2014 | MINNESOTA | 84 | -7 | SU ATS | 33 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 12-12 | 100.0% | 43 | 8 | 11 | | | TULSA | 75 | 166.5 | Under | 32 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 15-22 | 68.2% | 34 | 5 | 12 | 7/16/2014 | TULSA | 82 | 166.5 | Over | 39 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 24-28 | 85.7% | 44 | 13 | 16 | | | MINNESOTA | 93 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 23-27 | 85.2% | 39 | 8 | 8 | 7/10/2014 | MINNESOTA | 91 | -3 | SU ATS | 55 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 22-28 | 78.6% | 40 | 7 | 12 | | | TULSA | 85 | 164.5 | Over | 49 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 17-19 | 89.5% | 36 | 7 | 10 | 5/23/2014 | MINNESOTA | 94 | -6.5 | SU Over | 60 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 37 | 8 | 14 | | | TULSA | 93 | 161.5 | ATS | 48 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 9-23 | 39.1% | 20-27 | 74.1% | 40 | 7 | 10 |
|
| | |
|
Cheryl is 77-62 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) in home games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.7, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.4, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.5, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Cheryl is 32-46 against the 1rst half line (-18.6 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.0, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) in road games after a cover as a double digit favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.1, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 9-21 against the 1rst half line (-14.1 Units) in road games after a blowout win by 15 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.5, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 56-72 against the 1rst half line (-23.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.0, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 52-68 against the 1rst half line (-22.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.4, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 35-54 against the 1rst half line (-24.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.9, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 25-37 against the 1rst half line (-15.7 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.6, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 47-60 against the 1rst half line (-19.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.0, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 40-55 against the 1rst half line (-20.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.1, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 10-19 against the 1rst half line (-10.9 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.4, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 14-24 against the 1rst half line (-12.4 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.4, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 26-38 against the 1rst half line (-15.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.4, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 36-51 against the 1rst half line (-20.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.3, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Cheryl is 42-23 OVER (+16.7 Units) the 1rst half total as a road favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 22-9 OVER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total as a road favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.6, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 62-41 OVER (+16.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.7, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 62-41 OVER (+16.9 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.7, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 51-34 OVER (+13.6 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 70.5 as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.1, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 26-15 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in August or September games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.0, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 39-27 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 17-7 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing their 3rd game in 5 days as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.6, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 11-2 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.6, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 21-7 OVER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a cover as a double digit favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.6, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 36-23 OVER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win by 10 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.2, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 32-20 OVER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games off a home win as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.9, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 24-14 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.1, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 52-35 OVER (+13.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 35-21 OVER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.1, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 25-15 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.1, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 60-42 OVER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.4, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 65-43 OVER (+17.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.5, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 19-10 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.7, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 34-23 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.6, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 37-25 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.8, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 46-32 OVER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.0, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 48-35 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.5, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 23-13 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 48-33 OVER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.8, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 30-19 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.8, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 44-27 OVER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.0, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 35-21 OVER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.8, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 28-17 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.3, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 22-11 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 40.3, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 40-21 OVER (+16.9 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 39.3, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 16-4 OVER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 40.6, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Cheryl is 61-45 UNDER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.0, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.7, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home underdog covered the first half line 40 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 32 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog covered the first half line 9 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 6 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 39 games went under the first half total, while 22 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 3 games went over the first half total, while 3 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite covered the first half line 6 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 4 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite covered the first half line 2 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 0 times. | | Since 1997, 7 games went over the first half total, while 3 games went under the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 2 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
| [G] 07/31/2015 - Anna Cruz "?" Saturday vs. Tulsa Shock ( Ankle ) | | [G] 07/18/2015 - Seimone Augustus expected to miss a month ( Knee ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/27/2024 7:30:56 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|