| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
SEATTLE
CONNECTICUT |
|
|
148
| 66
Final
67 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 601 | SEATTLE | +220 | | 602 | CONNECTICUT | -300 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(172-53 since 1997.) (76.4%, +63.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread.
(149-54 since 1997.) (73.4%, +50.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread.
(125-44 since 1997.) (74%, +43.1 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(39-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +28.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(46-22 since 1997.) (67.6%, +28 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread.
(49-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after going over the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games against opponent after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(27-9 since 1997.) (75%, +22.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after going over the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games against opponent after going over the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games.
(23-7 since 1997.) (76.7%, +18.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 4 of their last 5 games against opponent after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(22-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.5%, +18.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(75-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in non-conference games, off a home loss.
(292-201 since 1997.) (59.2%, +85.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(287-312 since 1997.) (47.9%, +76.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws.
(277-263 since 1997.) (51.3%, +73.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in non-conference games, off a home loss against a division rival.
(166-116 since 1997.) (58.9%, +57.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games.
(193-122 since 1997.) (61.3%, +55 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games.
(138-72 since 1997.) (65.7%, +50.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - off a road loss, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(50-59 since 1997.) (45.9%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(134-73 since 1997.) (64.7%, +43.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a loss by 6 points or less.
(69-41 since 1997.) (62.7%, +43 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games.
(76-80 over the last 5 seasons.) (48.7%, +29.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games.
(84-74 since 1997.) (53.2%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(38-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.4%, +29 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(91-75 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.8%, +39.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(20-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +24.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(29-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.3%, +29.5 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(29-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.3%, +29.5 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(29-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.3%, +29.5 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better.
(85-40 since 1997.) (68%, +36.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a loss by 6 points or less.
(47-26 since 1997.) (64.4%, +36.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in non-conference games, off a close home loss by 3 points or less.
(60-32 since 1997.) (65.2%, +35.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games.
(62-42 since 1997.) (59.6%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(35-15 since 1997.) (70%, +32.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(35-15 since 1997.) (70%, +32.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(35-15 since 1997.) (70%, +32.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(95-69 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.9%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(60-27 since 1997.) (69%, +27.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(19-11 since 1997.) (63.3%, +26.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(24-13 since 1997.) (64.9%, +25.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(24-13 since 1997.) (64.9%, +25.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(24-13 since 1997.) (64.9%, +25.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in non-conference games, off a close home loss by 3 points or less.
(33-21 since 1997.) (61.1%, +25.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(54-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(41-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.6%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(55-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.9%, +26.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(66-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.5%, +28.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(45-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.4%, +32.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(37-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +26.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(211-162 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.6%, +57 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(52-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.9%, +24.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(56-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.2%, +33.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(27-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +21.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games.
(28-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +23.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(31-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.5%, +28.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(36-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.1%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| SEATTLE | 68 | | 26-62 | 42.3% | 5-17 | 32.7% | 11-13 | 79.9% | 40 | 7 | 16 | | CONNECTICUT | 78 | | 30-69 | 43.6% | 6-18 | 33.6% | 12-15 | 75.5% | 43 | 10 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 748 times, while SEATTLE won 232 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
SEATTLE is 24-25 against the money line (+15.6 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.4, OPPONENT 76.4 | CONNECTICUT is 8-20 against the money line (-14.5 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.2, OPPONENT 77.6 | CONNECTICUT is 11-30 against the money line (-19.8 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.5, OPPONENT 75.2 | CONNECTICUT is 4-11 against the money line (-10.2 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 68.7, OPPONENT 73.2 |
|
SEATTLE is 4-13 against the money line (-11.4 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 69.0, OPPONENT 76.7 | SEATTLE is 61-75 against the money line (-32.6 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 69.5, OPPONENT 69.6 | SEATTLE is 14-50 against the money line (-42.9 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.7, OPPONENT 79.8 | SEATTLE is 1-21 against the money line (-22.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.6, OPPONENT 84.7 | SEATTLE is 30-61 against the money line (-28.8 Units) in road games when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.7, OPPONENT 74.4 | CONNECTICUT is 6-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 75.3 | CONNECTICUT is 136-97 against the money line (+26.5 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 72.8 | CONNECTICUT is 76-37 against the money line (+37.3 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.5, OPPONENT 68.4 | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in home games when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 74.3 | CONNECTICUT is 16-7 against the money line (+15.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 79.3 |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 10-5 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 15-10 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 86-62 against the money line (+21.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.8, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 124-94 against the money line (+27.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.0, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 23-10 against the money line (+12.9 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.7, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 38-21 against the money line (+14.5 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.9, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 98-77 against the money line (+21.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.9, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 149-118 against the money line (+33.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.5, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-26 against the money line (-18.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.7, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-29 against the money line (-20.4 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.6, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 39-45 against the money line (-24.5 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.7, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 8-15 against the money line (-15.0 Units) in road games versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 68.0, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 12-30 against the money line (-26.6 Units) in road games versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 68.0, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-5 against the money line (+18.0 Units) versus teams who average 37 or less rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.1, OPPONENT 65.4 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-11 against the money line (+13.7 Units) versus teams who average 37 or less rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.5, OPPONENT 67.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 98-87 against the money line (+27.3 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.0, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 52-37 against the money line (+29.5 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.5, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 28-16 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after 2 straight games where opponent was called for 15 or less fouls since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.2, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 93-78 against the money line (+26.8 Units) off a road loss since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.4, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 44-43 against the money line (+17.9 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 69.6, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 94-78 against the money line (+21.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.6, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 107-98 against the money line (+31.4 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.5, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 141-122 against the money line (+28.9 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.4, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 62-59 against the money line (+23.7 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 69.8, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-20 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-6 against the money line (-6.2 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-16 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-29 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.6, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-32 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-12 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.1, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 4-15 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 69.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 1-11 against the money line (-10.8 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 69.7, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 9-29 against the money line (-18.3 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 67.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 5-21 against the money line (-16.5 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 68.3, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 3-11 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 69.1, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) against Western conference opponents this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-14 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) in non-conference games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-9 against the money line (+14.9 Units) in home games after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 42-30 against the money line (+15.0 Units) off a home loss since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.9, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 5-14 | -7.6 | 10-9 | 11-8 | 69.9 | 34.5 | 42.9% | 36.4 | 76.8 | 40.4 | 43.9% | 41.8 | | Road Games | 1-9 | -7 | 4-6 | 5-5 | 65.5 | 30.9 | 39.6% | 35.1 | 78.1 | 41.3 | 44.8% | 43.9 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +0.5 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 73.0 | 38.4 | 44.4% | 37.0 | 74.4 | 40.8 | 44.7% | 41.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 69.9 | 34.5 | 26-61 | 42.9% | 5-16 | 32.9% | 12-15 | 80.3% | 36 | 5 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 74.7 | 36.7 | 27-65 | 42.1% | 5-15 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 79.4% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 65.5 | 30.9 | 24-62 | 39.6% | 6-17 | 32.0% | 11-13 | 84.7% | 35 | 4 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.8 | 40.4 | 29-65 | 43.9% | 5-17 | 32.6% | 14-18 | 78.0% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.4 | 37.6 | 28-66 | 42.1% | 5-15 | 33.5% | 15-19 | 79.7% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.1 | 41.3 | 29-65 | 44.8% | 6-17 | 32.6% | 14-18 | 78.7% | 44 | 9 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 8-8 | +6.9 | 10-6 | 9-7 | 76.2 | 36.9 | 41.6% | 41.5 | 75.4 | 38.2 | 42.7% | 43.7 | | Home Games | 3-5 | -2.4 | 5-3 | 4-4 | 75.9 | 38.0 | 42.5% | 40.9 | 75.9 | 40.1 | 43.5% | 41.4 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -1.4 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 73.8 | 36.6 | 40.6% | 42.6 | 78.0 | 36.6 | 42.3% | 45.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 76.2 | 36.9 | 29-70 | 41.6% | 6-18 | 33.9% | 12-16 | 75.8% | 41 | 9 | 15 | 20 | 10 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 76 | 37.9 | 28-66 | 42.2% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 79.1% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 75.9 | 38.0 | 29-68 | 42.5% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 12-15 | 77.2% | 41 | 9 | 15 | 18 | 9 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.4 | 38.2 | 28-65 | 42.7% | 5-14 | 32.3% | 15-19 | 82.2% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 16 | 7 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 76.7 | 38.4 | 28-66 | 43.3% | 5-14 | 32.9% | 15-19 | 80.2% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.9 | 40.1 | 29-66 | 43.5% | 4-13 | 31.8% | 14-16 | 86.9% | 41 | 10 | 14 | 15 | 8 | 16 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: SEATTLE 70.8, CONNECTICUT 70.8 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/21/2015 | PHOENIX | 72-84 | L | +120 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 43 | 15 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 36 | 8 | | 6/25/2015 | MINNESOTA | 73-76 | L | +400 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 36 | 17 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 40 | 14 | | 6/27/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 71-73 | L | +180 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 34 | 14 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 45 | 15 | | 6/28/2015 | @ TULSA | 89-93 | L | +550 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 30 | 9 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 43 | 13 | | 6/30/2015 | TULSA | 74-69 | W | +120 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 42 | 9 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 43 | 10 | | 7/3/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 57-82 | L | +600 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 28 | 12 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 42 | 13 | | 7/5/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 64-72 | L | +210 | 23-59 | 39.0% | 36 | 14 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 49 | 12 | | 7/8/2015 | @ INDIANA | 65-88 | L | +210 | 19-45 | 42.2% | 36 | 19 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 32 | 11 | | 7/10/2015 | PHOENIX | 79-94 | L | +280 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 32 | 15 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 39 | 10 | | 7/12/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 60-70 | L | | 24-63 | 38.1% | 37 | 12 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 44 | 13 | | 7/15/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 68-61 | W | +135 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 31 | 11 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 41 | 21 | | 7/18/2015 | ATLANTA | 86-73 | W | +120 | 33-58 | 56.9% | 40 | 16 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 39 | 19 | | 7/21/2015 | NEW YORK | 77-81 | L | +170 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 36 | 14 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 39 | 10 | | 7/29/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 74-87 | L | +325 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 41 | 7 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 42 | 5 | | 7/31/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2015 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2015 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2015 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/21/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 76-68 | W | -175 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 40 | 8 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 37 | 16 | | 6/26/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 80-76 | W | -300 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 50 | 12 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 44 | 19 | | 6/30/2015 | INDIANA | 84-92 | L | -200 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 31 | 10 | 31-56 | 55.4% | 36 | 19 | | 7/2/2015 | CHICAGO | 74-77 | L | +155 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 14 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 36 | 15 | | 7/12/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 76-96 | L | +280 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 30 | 9 | 38-67 | 56.7% | 41 | 10 | | 7/14/2015 | MINNESOTA | 79-85 | L | +210 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 14 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 34 | 15 | | 7/16/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 57-64 | L | +180 | 21-70 | 30.0% | 47 | 15 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 53 | 13 | | 7/19/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 82-89 | L | +210 | 32-74 | 43.2% | 47 | 15 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 38 | 12 | | 7/22/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 78-77 | W | +280 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 42 | 15 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 50 | 16 | | 7/28/2015 | INDIANA | 73-75 | L | -115 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 37 | 18 | 33-81 | 40.7% | 52 | 13 | | 7/31/2015 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2015 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2015 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| SEATTLE is 14-17 (+0.3 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 3-2 (-1.4 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 11-4 (-3.1 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE since 1997 |
| |
| SEATTLE is 1-1 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/16/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 79 | 140.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 39 | 9 | 12 | | | SEATTLE | 58 | -2.5 | Under | 30 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 36 | 4 | 22 | 7/15/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 86 | 142 | SU ATS | 39 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 11-17 | 64.7% | 49 | 11 | 9 | | | SEATTLE | 63 | -3.5 | Over | 30 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 32 | 6 | 8 | 5/23/2014 | SEATTLE | 59 | 142.5 | Under | 27 | 19-51 | 37.3% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 30 | 3 | 14 | | | CONNECTICUT | 71 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 33 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 1-8 | 12.5% | 10-15 | 66.7% | 47 | 11 | 11 |
|
| | |
|
Anne is 5-20 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in July games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 12-24 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.4, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 7-30 against the money line (-25.4 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.3, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 5*) | Anne is 11-29 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.6, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 16-23 against the money line (-18.1 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 72.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 24-37 against the money line (-25.6 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 73.1, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 7-12 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in home games off an upset loss as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 74.4, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 13-32 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 9-20 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.0, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 5-12 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.1, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 90-105 against the money line (-49.8 Units) after playing a game as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 72.8, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 72-82 against the money line (-38.2 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 73.0, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 13-25 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.6, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 38-50 against the money line (-25.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 76.3, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 9-28 against the money line (-15.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Anne is 15-4 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in home games vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 80.3, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 188 times, while the road underdog won straight up 61 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 16 times, while the road underdog won straight up 8 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 07/16/2015 - Monica Wright out indefinitely ( Knee ) | |
| [G] 06/05/2015 - Allison Hightower out for season ( Suspension ) | | [F] 06/05/2015 - Kelsey Griffin out for season ( Hip ) | | [F] 06/04/2015 - Chiney Ogwumike out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/1/2024 2:49:36 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|