| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
SEATTLE SAN ANTONIO |
|
| 146.5 | 88 Final 67 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
603 | SEATTLE | +175 | 604 | SAN ANTONIO | -210 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Underdogs vs the money line (SEATTLE) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (83-25 since 1997.) (76.9%, +35 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better against opponent after a game where a team made 15% of their 3 point shots or worse. (54-24 since 1997.) (69.2%, +32.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (38-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.9%, +25.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (61-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +38.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (29-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.3%, +22.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (29-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.3%, +22.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (29-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.3%, +22.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (46-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +33.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (46-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +33.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (46-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +33.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (70-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.2%, +47.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (44-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (83%, +32.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season. (219-181 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.8%, +58.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (51-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.9%, +31.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (51-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.9%, +31.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (51-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.9%, +31.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (33-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.5%, +24.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (33-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.5%, +24.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (33-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.5%, +24.3 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (458-496 since 1997.) (48%, +100.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (256-260 since 1997.) (49.6%, +95.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, in July games. (155-169 since 1997.) (47.8%, +68.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games. (75-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.4%, +59.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (134-119 since 1997.) (53%, +55.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games. (82-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.7%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in July games. (45-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +34.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - horrible rebounding team - outrebounded by opponents by 5+ per game, on Friday nights. (29-11 since 1997.) (72.5%, +25.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season. (219-181 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.8%, +58.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (27-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +21.1 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE | 71 | | 27-60 | 44.8% | 6-18 | 34.8% | 11-14 | 78.7% | 40 | 7 | 16 | SAN ANTONIO | 77 | | 29-67 | 43.1% | 6-18 | 35.7% | 13-16 | 83.0% | 39 | 9 | 10 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, SAN ANTONIO won the game straight up 667 times, while SEATTLE won 310 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
SEATTLE is 74-30 against the money line (+40.4 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 77.3, OPPONENT 71.5 | SEATTLE is 61-59 against the money line (+20.4 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 71.3, OPPONENT 71.5 | SEATTLE is 18-14 against the money line (+19.9 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 72.4, OPPONENT 75.9 | SEATTLE is 12-5 against the money line (+15.5 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 80.9, OPPONENT 80.2 | SEATTLE is 26-28 against the money line (+20.9 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 71.4, OPPONENT 72.6 | SAN ANTONIO is 49-48 against the money line (-31.4 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 79.4, OPPONENT 79.6 | SAN ANTONIO is 34-74 against the money line (-59.0 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.9, OPPONENT 77.0 | SAN ANTONIO is 30-63 against the money line (-38.7 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 79.0 | SAN ANTONIO is 17-24 against the money line (-18.7 Units) in home games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.8, OPPONENT 77.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 42-65 against the money line (-27.7 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.1, OPPONENT 75.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 7-19 against the money line (-12.5 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 80.1 | SAN ANTONIO is 89-114 against the money line (-47.1 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 75.2 | SAN ANTONIO is 3-12 against the money line (-9.6 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 69.1, OPPONENT 78.8 |
|
SEATTLE is 25-46 against the money line (-24.3 Units) in road games when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 67.2, OPPONENT 74.1 | SEATTLE is 29-60 against the money line (-28.9 Units) in road games when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 71.1, OPPONENT 74.1 | SAN ANTONIO is 4-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents this season. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.6, OPPONENT 76.2 | SAN ANTONIO is 12-4 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in home games when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 87.1, OPPONENT 78.1 | SAN ANTONIO is 6-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.9, OPPONENT 68.9 | SAN ANTONIO is 11-3 against the money line (+12.2 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.1, OPPONENT 74.1 | SAN ANTONIO is 16-14 against the money line (+13.3 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.2, OPPONENT 77.3 |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 95-79 against the money line (+18.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 72.6, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 142-125 against the money line (+22.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 72.3, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 4-1 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 74.6, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 10-6 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 75.4, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 83-57 against the money line (+22.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 73.8, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 7-5 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 73.3, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 22-23 against the money line (+16.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 71.1, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 80-65 against the money line (+24.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 73.4, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 16-16 against the money line (+16.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 71.7, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 9-4 against the money line (+15.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 76.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 30-29 against the money line (+15.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 71.0, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 22-22 against the money line (+17.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 71.2, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 78-38 against the money line (+23.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 93-68 against the money line (+25.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 75.1, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 20-22 against the money line (+14.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 71.2, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 17-10 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 73.5, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 23-17 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 73.4, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 28-34 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 71.1, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 14-17 against the money line (+13.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 70.3, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 16-17 against the money line (+15.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 71.2, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 39-36 against the money line (-33.2 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 72-97 against the money line (-40.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 103-132 against the money line (-49.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.1, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 2-7 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.2, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 5-12 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.5, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 21-22 against the money line (-29.9 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 5-10 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 57-51 against the money line (-43.5 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 2-8 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.5, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 9-31 against the money line (-19.2 Units) in road games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 68.7, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 12-25 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in road games vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 68.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 8-17 against the money line (-11.5 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 68.1, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 24-9 against the money line (+16.8 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.5, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 16-7 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in home games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.3, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 25-30 against the money line (+13.3 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 70.2, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 16-24 against the money line (+17.2 Units) as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 69.4, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 180-163 against the money line (+24.2 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 71.2, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 16-19 against the money line (+12.6 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 69.5, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 146-119 against the money line (+24.1 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 72.5, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 8-8 against the money line (+13.4 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 69.0, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 87-79 against the money line (+19.6 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 70.7, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 11-5 against the money line (+18.8 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 71.5, OPPONENT 68.3 - (Rating = 6*) | SEATTLE is 8-6 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 68.6, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 6-4 against the money line (+11.5 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 68.2, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 10-10 against the money line (+12.6 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 69.1, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 11-8 against the money line (+15.5 Units) off a road loss over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 68.8, OPPONENT 68.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 41-38 against the money line (+19.4 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 69.6, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 90-67 against the money line (+28.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.7, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 99-83 against the money line (+19.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 73.4, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 12-6 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 73.3, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 19-21 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 70.3, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 103-88 against the money line (+37.1 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 70.6, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 137-112 against the money line (+34.6 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 71.5, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 17-11 against the money line (+19.8 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 69.7, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 17-13 against the money line (+22.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 69.4, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 4*) | SAN ANTONIO is 77-55 against the money line (-43.0 Units) as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 104-100 against the money line (-49.3 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.5, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 36-37 against the money line (-33.2 Units) in a home game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.2, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 81-75 against the money line (-45.3 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 15-35 against the money line (-25.1 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.2, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 44-74 against the money line (-46.0 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 25-33 against the money line (-23.1 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.5, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 16-15 against the money line (-20.3 Units) in home games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 2-7 against the money line (-7.8 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.2, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 48-57 against the money line (-30.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 35-39 against the money line (-25.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.6, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 12-14 against the money line (-19.6 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 39-45 against the money line (-39.5 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 24-28 against the money line (-23.2 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 80-109 against the money line (-38.8 Units) after a game where they covered the spread since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.8, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 13-24 against the money line (-27.5 Units) in home games after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 3*) | SAN ANTONIO is 40-44 against the money line (-35.1 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 14-17 against the money line (-18.5 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 12-28 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 28-62 against the money line (-28.9 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 68.4, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 2-8 against the money line (-8.7 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 67.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 12-25 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in road games off a road loss against a division rival since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 68.6, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 2-12 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 71.2, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 8-17 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after a game where a team made 15% of their 3 point shots or worse since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 67.1, OPPONENT 68.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 12-6 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in July games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 29-25 against the money line (+15.1 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 24-18 against the money line (+12.1 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 10-4 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 83.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 16-7 against the money line (+11.4 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.2, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 15-8 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 81.9, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 12-6 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 82.7, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 10-2 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after covering 8 or more of their last 10 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 85.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 3*) | SAN ANTONIO is 12-10 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 8-13 | -1.5 | 8-12 | 10-10 | 70.2 | 33.2 | 43.2% | 36.1 | 74.7 | 36.2 | 45.1% | 39.0 | Road Games | 3-10 | -5 | 5-7 | 6-7 | 68.5 | 32.6 | 42.9% | 35.1 | 75.4 | 35.0 | 45.4% | 38.8 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +0.1 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 68.8 | 30.4 | 44.9% | 35.2 | 73.2 | 38.0 | 44.8% | 40.0 | Division Games | 4-9 | -2.4 | 5-8 | 5-7 | 68.7 | 31.3 | 43.2% | 35.8 | 74.8 | 37.6 | 45.5% | 38.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.2 | 33.2 | 25-59 | 43.2% | 6-17 | 35.1% | 14-17 | 78.9% | 36 | 7 | 17 | 17 | 6 | 14 | 2 | vs opponents surrendering | 78.4 | 39 | 29-67 | 43.9% | 5-15 | 34.0% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 68.5 | 32.6 | 25-58 | 42.9% | 6-17 | 34.5% | 13-16 | 80.2% | 35 | 6 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 1 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.7 | 36.2 | 29-64 | 45.1% | 4-13 | 30.0% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 39 | 9 | 16 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 79.5 | 39.5 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 5-14 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 79.1% | 41 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 75.4 | 35.0 | 29-64 | 45.4% | 3-12 | 27.8% | 14-17 | 82.7% | 39 | 9 | 17 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 11-9 | +5 | 12-8 | 10-10 | 77.8 | 38.1 | 42.4% | 37.1 | 78.0 | 38.2 | 46.8% | 42.5 | Home Games | 4-5 | -3.8 | 3-6 | 6-3 | 80.2 | 38.6 | 41.4% | 37.0 | 79.3 | 40.6 | 47.4% | 43.7 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +4.2 | 5-0 | 1-4 | 76.4 | 36.4 | 42.7% | 38.6 | 72.6 | 33.2 | 40.5% | 42.4 | Division Games | 6-6 | +2.9 | 5-7 | 9-3 | 79.0 | 38.1 | 42.2% | 36.7 | 81.1 | 39.5 | 48.9% | 42.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.8 | 38.1 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 7-18 | 38.3% | 15-18 | 82.7% | 37 | 8 | 18 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.6 | 38.6 | 29-66 | 43.7% | 5-15 | 34.1% | 15-19 | 78.5% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.2 | 38.6 | 28-68 | 41.4% | 7-19 | 38.4% | 16-19 | 88.6% | 37 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.0 | 38.2 | 30-65 | 46.8% | 4-14 | 31.5% | 13-17 | 76.9% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 78.3 | 38.9 | 29-66 | 44.7% | 4-14 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 77.9% | 41 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 79.3 | 40.6 | 31-66 | 47.4% | 5-15 | 30.1% | 12-16 | 76.0% | 44 | 10 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: SEATTLE 72, SAN ANTONIO 71.9 |
| | |
|
|
6/1/2014 | TULSA | 62-60 | W | -165 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 34 | 11 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 40 | 15 | 6/3/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 72-87 | L | +450 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 34 | 14 | 33-62 | 53.2% | 37 | 11 | 6/6/2014 | MINNESOTA | 65-62 | W | +200 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 36 | 14 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 36 | 11 | 6/10/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 80-76 | W | +120 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 41 | 13 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 41 | 10 | 6/11/2014 | @ INDIANA | 68-76 | L | +220 | 23-49 | 46.9% | 30 | 13 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 33 | 12 | 6/13/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 79-72 | W | +200 | 33-58 | 56.9% | 32 | 16 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 36 | 12 | 6/15/2014 | @ TULSA | 79-85 | L | +210 | 29-55 | 52.7% | 29 | 11 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 40 | 8 | 6/19/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 82-87 | L | -155 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 47 | 12 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 45 | 6 | 6/22/2014 | WASHINGTON | 89-86 | W | -165 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 45 | 8 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 35 | 11 | 6/24/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 57-65 | L | +220 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 31 | 15 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 44 | 11 | 6/27/2014 | MINNESOTA | 81-71 | W | +210 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 40 | 13 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 40 | 6 | 6/29/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 69-74 | L | +325 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 29 | 15 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 48 | 18 | 7/3/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 56-70 | L | +105 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 35 | 18 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 36 | 14 | 7/5/2014 | CHICAGO | 80-73 | W | -140 | 28-55 | 50.9% | 29 | 5 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 46 | 10 | 7/9/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 58-78 | L | +375 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 43 | 20 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 30 | 6 | 7/11/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2014 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/22/2014 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2014 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/26/2014 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/1/2014 | MINNESOTA | 79-87 | L | +135 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 29 | 10 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 44 | 11 | 6/5/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 87-75 | W | +135 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 37 | 13 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 35 | 21 | 6/7/2014 | PHOENIX | 79-91 | L | +120 | 25-90 | 27.8% | 52 | 11 | 36-82 | 43.9% | 66 | 20 | 6/13/2014 | SEATTLE | 72-79 | L | -250 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 36 | 12 | 33-58 | 56.9% | 32 | 16 | 6/14/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 101-74 | W | +120 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 29 | 11 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 35 | 19 | 6/19/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 87-82 | W | +135 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 45 | 6 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 47 | 12 | 6/22/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 72-69 | W | +210 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 30 | 10 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 47 | 22 | 6/24/2014 | WASHINGTON | 70-81 | L | -250 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 37 | 8 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 40 | 9 | 6/26/2014 | ATLANTA | 79-81 | L | +135 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 37 | 16 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 46 | 13 | 6/29/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 73-65 | W | +120 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 42 | 7 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 43 | 12 | 7/1/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 74-71 | W | +145 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 33 | 15 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 47 | 19 | 7/3/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 84-91 | L | +280 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 43 | 12 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 38 | 7 | 7/5/2014 | @ INDIANA | 71-70 | W | +155 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 39 | 11 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 42 | 14 | 7/9/2014 | NEW YORK | 80-66 | W | -175 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 36 | 10 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 42 | 15 | 7/11/2014 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2014 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2014 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/22/2014 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/25/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/26/2014 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
SAN ANTONIO is 25-29 (-3.5 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE since 1997 |
| |
SEATTLE is 6-5 (+0.4 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
SAN ANTONIO is 15-11 (-3.3 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE since 1997 |
| |
SEATTLE is 3-3 (+1.9 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/19/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 87 | 148.5 | SU ATS | 35 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 10-17 | 58.8% | 17-22 | 77.3% | 45 | 8 | 6 | | SEATTLE | 82 | -3 | Over | 27 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 16-24 | 66.7% | 47 | 7 | 12 | 6/13/2014 | SEATTLE | 79 | 145 | SU ATS | 43 | 33-58 | 56.9% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 8-11 | 72.7% | 32 | 2 | 16 | | SAN ANTONIO | 72 | -6 | Over | 28 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 3-18 | 16.7% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 36 | 11 | 12 | 8/27/2013 | SEATTLE | 72 | -1.5 | SU Over | 31 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 8-16 | 50.0% | 10-15 | 66.7% | 43 | 11 | 17 | | SAN ANTONIO | 71 | 137 | ATS | 31 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 5-24 | 20.8% | 18-24 | 75.0% | 35 | 10 | 10 | 8/25/2013 | SEATTLE | 64 | 139.5 | Under | 24 | 19-53 | 35.8% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 20-23 | 87.0% | 36 | 8 | 15 | | SAN ANTONIO | 70 | 0 | SU ATS | 34 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 44 | 14 | 14 | 8/11/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 63 | 139 | Under | 26 | 23-68 | 33.8% | 6-26 | 23.1% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 38 | 9 | 10 | | SEATTLE | 69 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 56 | 15 | 11 | 8/9/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 77 | 142 | SU ATS | 47 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 34 | 4 | 10 | | SEATTLE | 56 | -7 | Under | 29 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 8-23 | 34.8% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 33 | 5 | 20 | 6/21/2013 | SEATTLE | 91 | 143.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 6-9 | 66.7% | 23-25 | 92.0% | 34 | 6 | 10 | | SAN ANTONIO | 86 | -6 | Over | 37 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 32 | 8 | 9 |
|
| | |
|
Brian is 139-99 against the money line (+49.6 Units) in all games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.7, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 33-19 against the money line (+22.9 Units) in July games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 83-57 against the money line (+40.7 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.7, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 29-16 against the money line (+16.1 Units) on Friday as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 91-61 against the money line (+39.3 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.7, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 85-64 against the money line (+23.5 Units) after a division game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.5, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 91-62 against the money line (+37.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.7, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 82-55 against the money line (+38.1 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 76-56 against the money line (+23.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.7, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 40-31 against the money line (+20.5 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 72.4, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 25-14 against the money line (+29.1 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 71.1, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 5*) | Brian is 28-12 against the money line (+27.1 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 72.6, OPPONENT 68.4 - (Rating = 5*) | Brian is 53-42 against the money line (+18.0 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 72.6, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 38-29 against the money line (+13.9 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 72.6, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 42-29 against the money line (+21.8 Units) off a road loss as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 72.8, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 18-17 against the money line (+12.9 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 71.1, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 52-31 against the money line (+30.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.5, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 22-13 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 54-37 against the money line (+26.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.9, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 23-24 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 71.4, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 15-11 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.9, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 59-50 against the money line (+32.2 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 72.3, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 49-41 against the money line (+24.9 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 72.4, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 69-49 against the money line (+30.0 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.2, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 65-46 against the money line (+26.2 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.2, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 56-40 against the money line (+28.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 72.7, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 28-21 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 75.8, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 49-54 against the money line (+14.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 72.3, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 47-34 against the money line (+15.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 74-56 against the money line (+28.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.0, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 51-24 against the money line (+23.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 76.4, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 68-36 against the money line (+30.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 76.7, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 53-29 against the money line (+18.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 75.5, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 79-43 against the money line (+37.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 76.0, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 54-46 against the money line (+12.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.6, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 76-53 against the money line (+25.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 113-80 against the money line (+43.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 50-33 against the money line (+31.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.7, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 72-50 against the money line (+39.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.9, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 18-11 against the money line (+13.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 79.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 30-16 against the money line (+28.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 80.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 5*) | Brian is 45-32 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 72.3, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 71-49 against the money line (+29.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 72.5, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 69-49 against the money line (+22.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.9, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 105-76 against the money line (+40.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.6, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 51-17 against the money line (+26.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 77.1, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 31-31 against the money line (+10.3 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 70.9, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 38-17 against the money line (+14.2 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 77.7, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 17-6 against the money line (+10.7 Units) vs. horrible rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 5+/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 79.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 76-54 against the money line (+23.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 111-77 against the money line (+40.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 53-27 against the money line (+22.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 77.2, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 77-39 against the money line (+37.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 77.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 70-49 against the money line (+24.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 99-71 against the money line (+38.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 51-41 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 75.1, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 74-58 against the money line (+30.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.9, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 29-20 against the money line (+22.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.1, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 41-30 against the money line (+30.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.0, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Dan is 145-161 against the money line (-27.6 Units) in all games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 81-51 against the money line (-30.3 Units) as a favorite as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 61-40 against the money line (-31.6 Units) as a home favorite as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.8, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 23-20 against the money line (-17.5 Units) as a home favorite of -165 to -250 as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 81-71 against the money line (-33.0 Units) in home games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.0, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 35-32 against the money line (-27.3 Units) in a home game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.6, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 71-61 against the money line (-32.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.1, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 17-18 against the money line (-15.0 Units) in home games on Friday as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 79-87 against the money line (-26.5 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 13-27 against the money line (-21.5 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Dan is 40-52 against the money line (-27.0 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 25-27 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.4, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 16-15 against the money line (-20.3 Units) in home games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 61-65 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.3, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 44-44 against the money line (-21.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.5, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 32-31 against the money line (-20.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 79.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 12-12 against the money line (-16.6 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.8, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 36-35 against the money line (-29.4 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 67-76 against the money line (-22.4 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 12-16 against the money line (-17.9 Units) in home games after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.2, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 35-33 against the money line (-25.1 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.5, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 10-23 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.0, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 21-22 against the money line (-21.1 Units) in home games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Dan 76.8, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 29-24 against the money line (-23.3 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 56-65 against the money line (-25.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 81-87 against the money line (-29.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 33-30 against the money line (-24.1 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.4, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 41-56 against the money line (-23.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 62-85 against the money line (-42.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 42-54 against the money line (-18.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 36-35 against the money line (-20.8 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.1, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 75-88 against the money line (-24.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 114-128 against the money line (-32.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 15-15 against the money line (-23.1 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.3, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 98-90 against the money line (-23.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 13-25 against the money line (-13.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 25-41 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.1, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Brian is 10-23 against the money line (-18.7 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 70.3, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 8-15 against the money line (-10.6 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 75.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 5-11 against the money line (-12.0 Units) in road games off a road loss against a division rival as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 70.4, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 3-10 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after a game where a team made 15% of their 3 point shots or worse in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 63.7, OPPONENT 66.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 6-12 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in road games vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.4, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 46-35 against the money line (+13.5 Units) in July games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 101-90 against the money line (+17.2 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 10-2 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after covering 8 or more of their last 10 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 85.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Dan is 37-27 against the money line (+9.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 23-13 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 16-6 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.5, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 228 times, while the road underdog won straight up 90 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 9 times, while the road underdog won straight up 6 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[F] 05/25/2013 - Lauren Jackson out for season ( Achilles ) | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/2/2024 1:04:07 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|