| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
PHOENIX
CHICAGO |
|
|
162
| 72
Final
66 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 605 | PHOENIX | -220 | | 606 | CHICAGO | +180 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(239-96 since 1997.) (71.3%, +83.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(239-96 since 1997.) (71.3%, +83.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(239-96 since 1997.) (71.3%, +83.1 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(239-96 since 1997.) (71.3%, +83.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(239-96 since 1997.) (71.3%, +83.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(239-96 since 1997.) (71.3%, +83.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(279-117 since 1997.) (70.5%, +81.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(279-117 since 1997.) (70.5%, +81.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(174-84 since 1997.) (67.4%, +52.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(138-63 since 1997.) (68.7%, +48.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(131-63 since 1997.) (67.5%, +46.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(114-53 since 1997.) (68.3%, +40.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(102-49 since 1997.) (67.5%, +40 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(96-43 since 1997.) (69.1%, +36.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(83-33 since 1997.) (71.6%, +35.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(69-30 since 1997.) (69.7%, +30.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset loss as a home favorite, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(23-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.2%, +14.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread.
(47-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.4%, +28.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home loss, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(36-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(43-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.1%, +26 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(458-496 since 1997.) (48%, +100.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(256-260 since 1997.) (49.6%, +95.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(180-55 since 1997.) (76.6%, +84.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - in non-conference games, off a home loss.
(280-197 since 1997.) (58.7%, +75 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(157-35 since 1997.) (81.8%, +74.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws.
(243-225 since 1997.) (51.9%, +74.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(228-81 since 1997.) (73.8%, +73.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more.
(234-92 since 1997.) (71.8%, +71 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(147-120 since 1997.) (55.1%, +67.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(227-94 since 1997.) (70.7%, +65.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(157-50 since 1997.) (75.8%, +63 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - off a win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(48-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.4%, +31.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(113-30 since 1997.) (79%, +60.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games.
(75-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.4%, +59.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(201-81 since 1997.) (71.3%, +57.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(122-43 since 1997.) (73.9%, +56.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(99-18 since 1997.) (84.6%, +55.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(134-119 since 1997.) (53%, +55.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(218-99 since 1997.) (68.8%, +55.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(146-50 since 1997.) (74.5%, +52.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(135-46 since 1997.) (74.6%, +50.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(39-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (83%, +27.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in July games.
(90-84 since 1997.) (51.7%, +49.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - in non-conference games, off a home loss against a division rival.
(157-114 since 1997.) (57.9%, +48.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(30-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.3%, +22.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(121-50 since 1997.) (70.8%, +48 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in July games.
(117-46 since 1997.) (71.8%, +47.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(94-29 since 1997.) (76.4%, +47.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games.
(71-53 since 1997.) (57.3%, +47.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(122-47 since 1997.) (72.2%, +47.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(117-48 since 1997.) (70.9%, +47 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(85-19 since 1997.) (81.7%, +46.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(77-18 since 1997.) (81.1%, +46.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws.
(126-47 since 1997.) (72.8%, +46.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, in July games.
(86-86 over the last 5 seasons.) (50%, +51.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(87-35 since 1997.) (71.3%, +44.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(71-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.2%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record.
(96-29 since 1997.) (76.8%, +43.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(73-20 since 1997.) (78.5%, +43.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games.
(36-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (87.8%, +28 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more.
(141-100 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.5%, +43.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season.
(94-29 since 1997.) (76.4%, +42 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(78-17 since 1997.) (82.1%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after scoring 75 points or more.
(111-36 since 1997.) (75.5%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - with a losing record, in July games.
(79-20 since 1997.) (79.8%, +40.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(106-51 since 1997.) (67.5%, +40.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record.
(57-8 since 1997.) (87.7%, +40.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(104-33 since 1997.) (75.9%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(87-30 since 1997.) (74.4%, +38.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games.
(82-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.7%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(66-13 since 1997.) (83.5%, +38.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(149-95 since 1997.) (61.1%, +37.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(60-15 since 1997.) (80%, +36.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better.
(62-28 since 1997.) (68.9%, +35.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(67-16 since 1997.) (80.7%, +35.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in July games.
(45-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +34.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(63-14 since 1997.) (81.8%, +35 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(62-14 since 1997.) (81.6%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games.
(33-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.2%, +24.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - off a win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(75-32 since 1997.) (70.1%, +34.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in July games.
(62-14 since 1997.) (81.6%, +34.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team, in July games.
(63-15 since 1997.) (80.8%, +34 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games.
(44-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.5%, +27.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(67-43 since 1997.) (60.9%, +33.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(30-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (90.9%, +24.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - off a home win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(45-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.6%, +21.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better.
(50-10 since 1997.) (83.3%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(98-56 since 1997.) (63.6%, +31.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(42-6 since 1997.) (87.5%, +30 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games against opponent after a game where they covered the spread.
(58-18 since 1997.) (76.3%, +29.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, on Friday nights.
(64-44 since 1997.) (59.3%, +29.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(66-18 since 1997.) (78.6%, +28.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(54-20 since 1997.) (73%, +28.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - off a home win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(28-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.8%, +21.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(51-20 since 1997.) (71.8%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in July games.
(45-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +31.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(48-25 since 1997.) (65.8%, +24.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after 8 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(29-3 since 1997.) (90.6%, +24.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, on Friday nights.
(42-24 since 1997.) (63.6%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in May, June, or July games.
(65-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.3%, +29.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(70-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.2%, +47.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(49-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.3%, +22.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a blowout win by 15 points or more.
(37-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +15.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season, on Friday nights.
(49-25 since 1997.) (66.2%, +20.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games, in July games.
(32-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.7%, +22.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games, on Friday nights.
(23-6 since 1997.) (79.3%, +18 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games.
(46-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +29.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(19-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.4%, +15.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - off a win against a division rival, in July games.
(35-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +27.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - off a home win against a division rival, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(26-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.2%, +15.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(51-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.9%, +31.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(51-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.9%, +31.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(51-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.9%, +31.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a win by 10 points or more.
(62-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.8%, +20.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - off a home win against a division rival, in July games.
(21-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +17.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a win by 10 points or more.
(128-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.3%, +36.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - off a home win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(34-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.3%, +16.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - off a home win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(64-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.1%, +31.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a loss against a division rival against opponent off a home win by 10 points or more.
(40-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +17.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - off a home win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season.
(131-75 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| PHOENIX | 81 | | 30-65 | 46.1% | 5-15 | 32.5% | 16-19 | 82.3% | 42 | 8 | 12 | | CHICAGO | 76 | | 29-68 | 42.8% | 3-12 | 28.8% | 15-18 | 80.7% | 41 | 10 | 11 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, PHOENIX won the game straight up 612 times, while CHICAGO won 361 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
PHOENIX is 21-12 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.5, OPPONENT 79.4 | PHOENIX is 9-1 against the money line (+9.6 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.9, OPPONENT 73.2 | PHOENIX is 108-76 against the money line (+34.9 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 80.3, OPPONENT 77.5 | PHOENIX is 11-1 against the money line (+11.2 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 84.8, OPPONENT 77.4 | PHOENIX is 4-0 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in road games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.0, OPPONENT 75.3 | PHOENIX is 8-2 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in road games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.4, OPPONENT 77.5 | PHOENIX is 7-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 83.2, OPPONENT 78.8 | PHOENIX is 17-8 against the money line (+13.1 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 82.9, OPPONENT 80.2 | PHOENIX is 11-3 against the money line (+8.0 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 77.9, OPPONENT 74.7 | PHOENIX is 78-57 against the money line (+20.4 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 79.7, OPPONENT 78.0 | PHOENIX is 88-64 against the money line (+23.6 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 78.2, OPPONENT 76.5 | PHOENIX is 30-7 against the money line (+21.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 86.2, OPPONENT 80.1 | CHICAGO is 60-102 against the money line (-58.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 78.6 | CHICAGO is 35-49 against the money line (-25.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 76.4 | CHICAGO is 7-14 against the money line (-11.7 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 81.7 | CHICAGO is 18-24 against the money line (-20.0 Units) in home games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 76.8 | CHICAGO is 9-14 against the money line (-17.4 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.9, OPPONENT 75.5 | CHICAGO is 19-33 against the money line (-21.4 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 78.3 | CHICAGO is 7-18 against the money line (-14.3 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 80.3 | CHICAGO is 3-9 against the money line (-7.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.0, OPPONENT 88.1 | CHICAGO is 36-39 against the money line (-24.9 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 82.3 | CHICAGO is 5-9 against the money line (-10.7 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 75.9 | CHICAGO is 27-28 against the money line (-21.8 Units) in home games in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 75.8 |
|
PHOENIX is 86-109 against the money line (-43.1 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 79.7, OPPONENT 82.1 |
|
| | |
|
PHOENIX is 7-4 against the money line (+10.4 Units) in road games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 76.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 15-7 against the money line (+14.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 77.3, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 28-13 against the money line (+15.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 80.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 10-5 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 80.6, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 12-7 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 79.5, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 15-8 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.5, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 9-4 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 79.5, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 15-7 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 82.3, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 10-6 against the money line (+12.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 76.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 19-11 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 80.4, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 8-6 against the money line (+10.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 75.7, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 12-10 against the money line (+9.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 76.5, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 8-5 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 76.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-11.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 69.9, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 16-23 against the money line (-14.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-29 against the money line (-18.4 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.7, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-46 against the money line (-29.8 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-10.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 67.7, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 2-9 against the money line (-14.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 5*) | CHICAGO is 90-130 against the money line (-49.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 17-23 against the money line (-17.4 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-18 against the money line (-19.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 2-6 against the money line (-9.2 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 70.1, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-10 against the money line (-7.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 32-43 against the money line (-28.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 64-115 against the money line (-51.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 36-82 against the money line (-35.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-12 against the money line (-9.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.5, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-11 against the money line (-11.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
PHOENIX is 21-21 against the money line (-21.2 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 78.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 9-13 against the money line (-14.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 74.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 5-9 against the money line (-13.0 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 74.1, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 2-9 against the money line (-16.0 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 71.6, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 6*) | PHOENIX is 6-12 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 71.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 3-7 against the money line (-13.0 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 71.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.4, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
PHOENIX is 18-10 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 80.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 18-10 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 80.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 18-10 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 80.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 12-5 against the money line (+14.7 Units) in road games after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.2, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 4*) | PHOENIX is 7-3 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in road games after 2 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 79.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 11-5 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 11-5 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 84.5, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 14-4 against the money line (+9.8 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 80.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 6-1 against the money line (+5.4 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 82.6, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 8-2 against the money line (+6.3 Units) off a home win against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 80.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 15-7 against the money line (+11.5 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 82.4, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 65-57 against the money line (+19.4 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 86.8, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 12-2 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 84.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 13-5 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 83.9, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 59-50 against the money line (+21.4 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 88.4, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 102-67 against the money line (+23.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 89.9, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 90-58 against the money line (+21.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 90.8, OPPONENT 88.2 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 12-2 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 85.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 71-76 against the money line (-39.7 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 68-72 against the money line (-38.7 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 32-37 against the money line (-22.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 31-50 against the money line (-23.7 Units) in July games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 20-22 against the money line (-19.0 Units) in home games on Friday since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 40-63 against the money line (-30.1 Units) against Western conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-8 against the money line (-7.8 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 40-63 against the money line (-30.1 Units) in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-9 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-12 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-8.0 Units) in home games after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-12 against the money line (-12.0 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-11 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-15 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-8 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 71.3, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 4-8 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in home games revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 71.3, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 8-19 against the money line (-17.1 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 7-17 against the money line (-15.0 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-8 against the money line (-11.0 Units) off a home loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-14 against the money line (-14.6 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-29 against the money line (-21.5 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.9, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 10-25 against the money line (-20.5 Units) off an upset loss as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 7-12 against the money line (-11.9 Units) off a home loss over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-9 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 2-11 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 68.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 7*) | CHICAGO is 44-71 against the money line (-42.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 10-15 against the money line (-11.3 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-16 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-23 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 17-23 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-14 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-18 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
PHOENIX is 19-23 against the money line (-19.2 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 83.5, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 5-10 against the money line (-16.9 Units) red hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 83.9, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 29-37 against the money line (-21.4 Units) after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 75.8, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 1-5 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in road games after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 74.5, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 18-32 against the money line (-32.5 Units) after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 78.5, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 14-3 | +5.2 | 11-6 | 8-9 | 84.9 | 40.3 | 49.2% | 38.6 | 76.2 | 37.1 | 41.6% | 40.5 | | Road Games | 7-2 | +3.7 | 5-4 | 4-5 | 83.8 | 37.2 | 47.2% | 39.3 | 79.8 | 39.2 | 41.2% | 43.3 | | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +5 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 84.0 | 38.0 | 47.9% | 35.0 | 73.8 | 36.8 | 40.8% | 43.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 84.9 | 40.3 | 31-62 | 49.2% | 5-14 | 37.2% | 18-22 | 83.5% | 39 | 7 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 6 | | vs opponents surrendering | 79 | 39.1 | 30-65 | 45.2% | 5-14 | 33.8% | 15-19 | 79.2% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 83.8 | 37.2 | 30-63 | 47.2% | 5-13 | 34.5% | 20-24 | 82.3% | 39 | 7 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 7 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.2 | 37.1 | 29-69 | 41.6% | 5-17 | 31.2% | 13-17 | 79.6% | 41 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 2 | | vs opponents averaging | 77.7 | 38.3 | 29-66 | 43.8% | 5-15 | 33.6% | 15-19 | 78.6% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.8 | 39.2 | 29-71 | 41.2% | 6-17 | 36.9% | 15-19 | 80.3% | 43 | 11 | 17 | 22 | 7 | 14 | 2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 8-11 | -4 | 8-11 | 10-9 | 78.9 | 40.6 | 44.2% | 42.1 | 81.6 | 41.7 | 43.5% | 43.3 | | Home Games | 5-6 | -3.8 | 5-6 | 8-3 | 83.6 | 40.4 | 45.4% | 43.6 | 82.8 | 41.3 | 43.3% | 42.1 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.5 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 74.0 | 42.2 | 42.1% | 41.0 | 78.2 | 42.2 | 44.0% | 39.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 78.9 | 40.6 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 4-12 | 32.0% | 15-19 | 79.6% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 6 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77 | 37.7 | 29-66 | 43.5% | 5-14 | 33.2% | 15-19 | 78.0% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 83.6 | 40.4 | 32-69 | 45.4% | 4-11 | 31.7% | 17-21 | 81.7% | 44 | 10 | 19 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 8 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.6 | 41.7 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 5-14 | 34.1% | 17-21 | 78.7% | 43 | 11 | 19 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 76.7 | 37.8 | 29-66 | 43.6% | 4-14 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 76.9% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 82.8 | 41.3 | 30-70 | 43.3% | 5-13 | 35.0% | 18-22 | 79.8% | 42 | 10 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 6 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: PHOENIX 71.6, CHICAGO 69.4 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/3/2014 | SEATTLE | 87-72 | W | -650 | 33-62 | 53.2% | 37 | 11 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 34 | 14 | | 6/6/2014 | @ TULSA | 78-94 | L | -220 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 33 | 15 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 42 | 14 | | 6/7/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 91-79 | W | -140 | 36-82 | 43.9% | 66 | 20 | 25-90 | 27.8% | 52 | 11 | | 6/10/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 81-66 | W | -175 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 35 | 9 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 41 | 15 | | 6/12/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 95-96 | L | -270 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 38 | 7 | 33-67 | 49.3% | 38 | 12 | | 6/15/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 80-72 | W | +180 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 42 | 10 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 42 | 10 | | 6/18/2014 | MINNESOTA | 92-79 | W | -200 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 44 | 13 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 28 | 6 | | 6/20/2014 | TULSA | 91-80 | W | -750 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 35 | 8 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 54 | 5 | | 6/27/2014 | @ INDIANA | 81-76 | W | -220 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 30 | 7 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 46 | 17 | | 6/29/2014 | @ TULSA | 80-77 | W | -200 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 33 | 13 | 24-77 | 31.2% | 50 | 12 | | 7/2/2014 | CHICAGO | 87-69 | W | -500 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 51 | 13 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 38 | 7 | | 7/6/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 94-89 | W | -125 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 31 | 15 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 39 | 15 | | 7/9/2014 | SEATTLE | 78-58 | W | -550 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 30 | 6 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 43 | 20 | | 7/11/2014 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2014 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2014 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/22/2014 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/26/2014 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/6/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 88-102 | L | -165 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 41 | 17 | 43-77 | 55.8% | 38 | 10 | | 6/7/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 59-97 | L | +200 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 40 | 18 | 35-78 | 44.9% | 59 | 13 | | 6/10/2014 | SEATTLE | 76-80 | L | -140 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 41 | 10 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 41 | 13 | | 6/13/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 68-79 | L | +220 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 44 | 13 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 45 | 14 | | 6/18/2014 | NEW YORK | 105-100 | W | -125 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 44 | 10 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 45 | 17 | | 6/20/2014 | INDIANA | 75-83 | L | -165 | 33-67 | 49.3% | 36 | 14 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 52 | 14 | | 6/22/2014 | TULSA | 99-105 | L | -140 | 39-77 | 50.6% | 42 | 14 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 43 | 17 | | 6/25/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 69-79 | L | +100 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 33 | 12 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 55 | 14 | | 6/27/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 73-69 | W | -120 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 26 | 15 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 47 | 16 | | 7/1/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 90-83 | W | +210 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 45 | 21 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 31 | 11 | | 7/2/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 69-87 | L | +350 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 38 | 7 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 51 | 13 | | 7/5/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 73-80 | L | +120 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 46 | 10 | 28-55 | 50.9% | 29 | 5 | | 7/9/2014 | WASHINGTON | 65-72 | L | -165 | 21-67 | 31.3% | 50 | 15 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 41 | 12 | | 7/11/2014 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2014 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2014 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/22/2014 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/25/2014 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/27/2014 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| PHOENIX is 13-4 (+10.6 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
| PHOENIX is 2-3 (+0.0 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| PHOENIX is 6-2 (+7.6 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
| PHOENIX is 1-1 (+3.0 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/2/2014 | CHICAGO | 69 | 161.5 | Under | 38 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 5-8 | 62.5% | 38 | 7 | 7 | | | PHOENIX | 87 | -9.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 20-24 | 83.3% | 51 | 12 | 13 | 9/11/2013 | PHOENIX | 68 | 157 | ATS | 40 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 10-11 | 90.9% | 33 | 6 | 8 | | | CHICAGO | 70 | -8.5 | SU Under | 36 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 21-28 | 75.0% | 46 | 5 | 10 | 5/27/2013 | CHICAGO | 102 | 167.5 | SU ATS | 56 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 8-16 | 50.0% | 20-23 | 87.0% | 46 | 13 | 12 | | | PHOENIX | 80 | -7 | Over | 32 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 18-20 | 90.0% | 34 | 7 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Pokey is 59-62 against the money line (-20.3 Units) in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 17-24 against the money line (-16.5 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 36-47 against the money line (-34.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 17-24 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 10-19 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 11-17 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 27-33 against the money line (-17.4 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 22-29 against the money line (-16.8 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 16-19 against the money line (-13.1 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 10-16 against the money line (-12.7 Units) off a home loss as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 23-39 against the money line (-32.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 13-32 against the money line (-30.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 5*) | Pokey is 6-16 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.4, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Pokey is 20-28 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 22-37 against the money line (-28.1 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 25-34 against the money line (-21.5 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 26-33 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 5-10 against the money line (-10.6 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 10-17 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 6-13 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 10-25 against the money line (-20.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 22-38 against the money line (-26.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 3-12 against the money line (-9.8 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 7-19 against the money line (-14.9 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 10-21 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.5, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 16-34 against the money line (-34.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 5*) | Pokey is 10-22 against the money line (-13.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 23-31 against the money line (-14.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 41-52 against the money line (-30.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 13-24 against the money line (-16.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.4, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 18-40 against the money line (-38.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 5*) | Pokey is 5-15 against the money line (-15.2 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 25-33 against the money line (-13.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.5, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 43-54 against the money line (-30.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 10-10 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 42-47 against the money line (-18.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 25-42 against the money line (-23.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 16-37 against the money line (-21.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 7-17 against the money line (-11.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 11-25 against the money line (-19.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Sandy is 3-7 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Sandy 81.3, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 39 times, while the home underdog won straight up 22 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 7 times, while the home underdog won straight up 6 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/3/2024 2:55:22 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|