| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA INDIANA |
|
| 153.5 | 93 Final 74 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
651 | ATLANTA | -120 | 652 | INDIANA | +100 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more. (108-60 since 1997.) (64.3%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (170-87 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +75.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better. (24-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +17 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more. (77-39 since 1997.) (66.4%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15+ games, after scoring 80 points or more. (57-28 since 1997.) (67.1%, +27.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season. (221-182 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.8%, +59.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (114-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.3%, +52.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (114-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.3%, +52.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (114-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.3%, +52.3 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (461-496 since 1997.) (48.2%, +104.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (259-260 since 1997.) (49.9%, +99.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more. (235-92 since 1997.) (71.9%, +72 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (149-120 since 1997.) (55.4%, +69.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (229-94 since 1997.) (70.9%, +67.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (124-43 since 1997.) (74.3%, +58.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (136-119 since 1997.) (53.3%, +58.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (220-99 since 1997.) (69%, +57.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (148-50 since 1997.) (74.7%, +54.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (136-46 since 1997.) (74.7%, +51.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (41-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.7%, +29.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (119-48 since 1997.) (71.3%, +49 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games. (122-50 since 1997.) (70.9%, +49 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in July games. (118-46 since 1997.) (72%, +48.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (79-18 since 1997.) (81.4%, +48.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games. (140-56 since 1997.) (71.4%, +46 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (73-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.7%, +34.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (50-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.3%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (74-20 since 1997.) (78.7%, +44.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (52-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.9%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent as a home favorite of 7 or more. (112-62 since 1997.) (64.4%, +43.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more. (142-100 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.7%, +44.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a straight up loss vs opponent as a favorite of 7 or more. (119-65 since 1997.) (64.7%, +42.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (47-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (87%, +33.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (75-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.6%, +29.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in July games. (88-30 since 1997.) (74.6%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (68-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.8%, +33.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (INDIANA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games. (42-20 since 1997.) (67.7%, +24.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (44-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (71%, +22.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less. (43-17 since 1997.) (71.7%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after scoring 80 points or more in a win over a division rival, in July games. (33-11 since 1997.) (75%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (56-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +31.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more. (90-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (72%, +39.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games, in July games. (33-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.5%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (41-21 since 1997.) (66.1%, +18.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a straight up loss vs opponent as a favorite of 7 or more, off a home win against a division rival. (20-5 since 1997.) (80%, +16.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (39-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a win against a division rival, in July games. (36-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +28.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (60-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +15.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 80 points or more. (72-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +36.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (28-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.8%, +22.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a win by 10 points or more. (63-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +21.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a home win against a division rival, in July games. (22-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (71%, +18.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a win by 10 points or more. (129-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.5%, +37.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a home win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season. (132-75 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.8%, +40.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA | 75 | | 28-65 | 43.2% | 3-13 | 25.6% | 15-21 | 71.1% | 44 | 11 | 16 | INDIANA | 77 | | 27-64 | 41.7% | 5-15 | 36.2% | 18-23 | 76.9% | 42 | 11 | 16 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, INDIANA won the game straight up 545 times, while ATLANTA won 424 times. Edge against the money line=INDIANA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
INDIANA is 11-18 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.2, OPPONENT 75.9 | INDIANA is 6-11 against the money line (-9.7 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.9, OPPONENT 75.4 | INDIANA is 17-24 against the money line (-13.8 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 72.2, OPPONENT 72.9 | INDIANA is 38-64 against the money line (-38.4 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.7, OPPONENT 74.4 | INDIANA is 4-10 against the money line (-8.9 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.3, OPPONENT 74.1 | INDIANA is 0-5 against the money line (-8.8 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 83.0, OPPONENT 88.2 |
|
ATLANTA is 9-17 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 72.8, OPPONENT 78.3 | ATLANTA is 14-15 against the money line (-16.4 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 77.8 | ATLANTA is 22-27 against the money line (-21.3 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 79.1 | ATLANTA is 14-15 against the money line (-17.3 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 77.2 | ATLANTA is 44-53 against the money line (-26.4 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 80.8 | ATLANTA is 4-9 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 83.4 | INDIANA is 21-9 against the money line (+14.4 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 72.0 | INDIANA is 51-26 against the money line (+19.8 Units) when their opponents make 22% to 28% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.3, OPPONENT 68.4 |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 8-19 against the money line (-23.9 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 74.7, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 4*) | INDIANA is 23-33 against the money line (-28.1 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 73.2, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 16-20 against the money line (-17.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 13-18 against the money line (-18.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 7-15 against the money line (-13.9 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 71.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 13-17 against the money line (-15.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-16 against the money line (-16.6 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 71.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 10-14 against the money line (-18.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.0, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 5-13 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.1, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 2-6 against the money line (-12.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 72.9, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 6-13 against the money line (-15.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 71.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 25-28 against the money line (-20.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 7-3 against the money line (+8.7 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 34-21 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.4, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 36-22 against the money line (+16.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.1, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 5-0 against the money line (+8.6 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.8, OPPONENT 64.4 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 8-2 against the money line (+9.4 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.1, OPPONENT 66.9 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 11-5 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 71.8, OPPONENT 66.6 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 9-1 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.5, OPPONENT 67.5 - (Rating = 5*) | INDIANA is 11-5 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.1, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 33-22 against the money line (+12.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.1, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 7-3 against the money line (+8.7 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 24-18 against the money line (+10.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.4, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 11-6 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.0, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 17-6 against the money line (+8.9 Units) off a home win over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 8-14 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 72.5, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 0-6 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 8-12 against the money line (-10.7 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 3-7 against the money line (-10.1 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 72-76 against the money line (-34.8 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.3, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 87-90 against the money line (-40.1 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.3, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 92-98 against the money line (-43.5 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.1, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 139-139 against the money line (-53.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.2, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 64-76 against the money line (-33.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.4, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 10-18 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 72.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 10-18 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 72.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-15 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.3, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 2-9 against the money line (-9.5 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 70.5, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 4-12 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 71.3, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 9-17 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-9 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 70.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-11 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 72.4, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-9 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.4, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 3-9 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.4, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 9-3 against the money line (+6.8 Units) in July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.0, OPPONENT 67.4 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 40-28 against the money line (+11.2 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.1, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 6-2 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season. The average score was INDIANA 74.0, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 13-5 | +1.1 | 10-8 | 10-8 | 81.5 | 41.1 | 44.4% | 46.7 | 76.1 | 37.9 | 42.3% | 41.8 | Road Games | 4-3 | -1 | 2-5 | 4-3 | 78.4 | 40.6 | 42.2% | 45.6 | 79.9 | 39.9 | 44.7% | 41.9 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +0.7 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 79.2 | 39.6 | 45.3% | 48.0 | 73.6 | 38.0 | 39.8% | 41.8 | Division Games | 8-5 | -4.3 | 7-6 | 7-6 | 80.7 | 40.5 | 43.2% | 48.5 | 75.3 | 37.8 | 41.8% | 42.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 81.5 | 41.1 | 31-70 | 44.4% | 4-14 | 28.9% | 16-22 | 70.8% | 47 | 12 | 19 | 18 | 10 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.1 | 37.7 | 29-66 | 43.8% | 4-14 | 32.2% | 15-20 | 77.6% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 78.4 | 40.6 | 29-69 | 42.2% | 5-16 | 29.5% | 15-22 | 69.7% | 46 | 12 | 17 | 18 | 12 | 17 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.1 | 37.9 | 28-66 | 42.3% | 6-15 | 37.4% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 9 | 16 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 75.6 | 37.4 | 28-65 | 42.9% | 5-14 | 33.4% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.9 | 39.9 | 29-65 | 44.7% | 7-17 | 42.5% | 14-19 | 75.2% | 42 | 8 | 17 | 19 | 9 | 18 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 10-10 | +2.7 | 12-8 | 11-9 | 75.7 | 36.8 | 41.5% | 40.2 | 77.0 | 35.7 | 44.3% | 42.2 | Home Games | 4-6 | -4.5 | 5-5 | 4-6 | 76.4 | 35.8 | 42.3% | 40.2 | 77.1 | 36.0 | 45.0% | 40.8 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +4.3 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 75.4 | 35.6 | 43.2% | 38.4 | 72.4 | 33.0 | 41.5% | 42.0 | Division Games | 8-6 | +6.4 | 8-6 | 8-6 | 73.9 | 35.6 | 41.1% | 40.4 | 75.4 | 35.9 | 43.4% | 44.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 75.7 | 36.8 | 26-63 | 41.5% | 5-14 | 35.6% | 18-23 | 76.6% | 40 | 10 | 15 | 22 | 9 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.4 | 38.1 | 29-66 | 43.5% | 5-14 | 34.2% | 15-20 | 76.9% | 41 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 76.4 | 35.8 | 27-63 | 42.3% | 6-15 | 40.1% | 17-23 | 74.6% | 40 | 10 | 14 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.0 | 35.7 | 28-63 | 44.3% | 4-13 | 27.8% | 18-23 | 78.0% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 21 | 8 | 15 | 6 | vs opponents averaging | 77.8 | 38.3 | 29-67 | 43.5% | 5-15 | 31.8% | 15-19 | 76.9% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 77.1 | 36.0 | 28-63 | 45.0% | 4-13 | 32.3% | 16-20 | 79.4% | 41 | 9 | 15 | 21 | 8 | 15 | 6 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 69.8, INDIANA 69.1 |
| | |
|
|
6/3/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 93-85 | W | +135 | 39-73 | 53.4% | 40 | 17 | 37-77 | 48.1% | 40 | 16 | 6/7/2014 | CHICAGO | 97-59 | W | -250 | 35-78 | 44.9% | 59 | 13 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 40 | 18 | 6/13/2014 | MINNESOTA | 85-82 | W | -120 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 46 | 15 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 42 | 12 | 6/15/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 75-67 | W | -175 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 52 | 17 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 42 | 19 | 6/18/2014 | WASHINGTON | 83-73 | W | -330 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 45 | 10 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 38 | 14 | 6/20/2014 | NEW YORK | 85-64 | W | -450 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 50 | 10 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 43 | 15 | 6/22/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 78-85 | L | -200 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 56 | 15 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 40 | 16 | 6/26/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 81-79 | W | -155 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 46 | 13 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 37 | 16 | 6/29/2014 | @ INDIANA | 76-68 | W | -155 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 37 | 15 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 43 | 18 | 7/1/2014 | INDIANA | 70-77 | L | -330 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 57 | 15 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 44 | 11 | 7/5/2014 | WASHINGTON | 86-73 | W | -400 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 48 | 8 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 44 | 15 | 7/8/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 83-71 | W | -450 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 52 | 20 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 41 | 20 | 7/12/2014 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2014 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/16/2014 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/22/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/25/2014 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/27/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/6/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 64-61 | W | +170 | 21-60 | 35.0% | 38 | 11 | 18-61 | 29.5% | 51 | 17 | 6/7/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 71-88 | L | +155 | 26-49 | 53.1% | 30 | 25 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 40 | 12 | 6/11/2014 | SEATTLE | 76-68 | W | -300 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 33 | 12 | 23-49 | 46.9% | 30 | 13 | 6/17/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 67-89 | L | +145 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 37 | 21 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 43 | 21 | 6/20/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 83-75 | W | +145 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 52 | 14 | 33-67 | 49.3% | 36 | 14 | 6/22/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 77-83 | L | +350 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 37 | 16 | 31-54 | 57.4% | 34 | 19 | 6/25/2014 | TULSA | 102-107 | L | -200 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 45 | 12 | 39-78 | 50.0% | 46 | 14 | 6/27/2014 | PHOENIX | 76-81 | L | +180 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 46 | 17 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 30 | 7 | 6/29/2014 | ATLANTA | 68-76 | L | +135 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 43 | 18 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 37 | 15 | 7/1/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 77-70 | W | +250 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 44 | 11 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 57 | 15 | 7/2/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 80-77 | W | +155 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 38 | 17 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 37 | 14 | 7/5/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 70-71 | L | -175 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 42 | 14 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 39 | 11 | 7/8/2014 | @ TULSA | 78-76 | W | -105 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 36 | 11 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 41 | 15 | 7/10/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 72-68 | W | -220 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 32 | 14 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 36 | 12 | 7/12/2014 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2014 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2014 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/22/2014 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/26/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/28/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
ATLANTA is 20-17 (+2.8 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA since 1997 |
| |
INDIANA is 8-10 (-0.1 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
ATLANTA is 9-11 (+4.2 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA since 1997 |
| |
ATLANTA is 5-4 (+3.1 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/1/2014 | INDIANA | 77 | 154 | SU ATS | 40 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 27-30 | 90.0% | 44 | 7 | 11 | | ATLANTA | 70 | -7.5 | Under | 34 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 0-13 | 0.0% | 20-32 | 62.5% | 57 | 12 | 15 | 6/29/2014 | ATLANTA | 76 | -3 | SU ATS | 40 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 10-15 | 66.7% | 37 | 5 | 15 | | INDIANA | 68 | 156.5 | Under | 37 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 9-25 | 36.0% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 43 | 12 | 18 | 5/25/2014 | INDIANA | 82 | 151 | SU ATS | 39 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 24-36 | 66.7% | 48 | 15 | 13 | | ATLANTA | 77 | -8.5 | Over | 35 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 16-23 | 69.6% | 47 | 8 | 21 | 5/17/2014 | ATLANTA | 90 | -3 | SU Over | 46 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 5-13 | 38.5% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 46 | 11 | 26 | | INDIANA | 88 | 147 | ATS | 44 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 10-19 | 52.6% | 41 | 12 | 22 | 9/29/2013 | ATLANTA | 67 | 145 | SU ATS | 34 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 1-12 | 8.3% | 12-17 | 70.6% | 52 | 14 | 11 | | INDIANA | 53 | -5.5 | Under | 33 | 18-64 | 28.1% | 4-21 | 19.0% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 45 | 13 | 15 | 9/26/2013 | INDIANA | 79 | 144 | Over | 40 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 38 | 10 | 16 | | ATLANTA | 84 | -3 | SU ATS | 42 | 32-60 | 53.3% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 29 | 7 | 11 | 9/4/2013 | INDIANA | 80 | 144 | Over | 33 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 9-24 | 37.5% | 17-22 | 77.3% | 44 | 16 | 15 | | ATLANTA | 89 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 23-30 | 76.7% | 59 | 15 | 16 | 8/10/2013 | ATLANTA | 66 | 143 | Over | 37 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 29 | 2 | 14 | | INDIANA | 80 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 46 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 38 | 11 | 13 | 6/25/2013 | INDIANA | 60 | 142 | Under | 30 | 22-61 | 36.1% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 48 | 14 | 23 | | ATLANTA | 76 | -13 | SU ATS | 36 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 20-28 | 71.4% | 32 | 6 | 15 | 5/31/2013 | ATLANTA | 86 | 157 | SU ATS | 46 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 42 | 12 | 13 | | INDIANA | 77 | -5 | Over | 47 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 36 | 11 | 13 |
|
| | |
|
Michael is 34-14 against the money line (+15.7 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 74.3, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 212-106 against the money line (+42.5 Units) in all games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.2, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 178-55 against the money line (+46.9 Units) as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.2, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 70-26 against the money line (+25.9 Units) as a road favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 73.9, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 55-24 against the money line (+18.4 Units) as a road favorite of -245 or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 74.1, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 95-66 against the money line (+21.6 Units) in road games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 73.1, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 141-67 against the money line (+26.8 Units) in May, June, or July games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.8, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 49-19 against the money line (+26.3 Units) on Saturday games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 74.4, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 141-73 against the money line (+29.3 Units) vs. division opponents in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.0, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 144-63 against the money line (+48.0 Units) after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.1, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 99-48 against the money line (+29.9 Units) after 2 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.3, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 77-34 against the money line (+27.8 Units) after 3 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.1, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 48-20 against the money line (+19.7 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.3, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 94-34 against the money line (+48.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.9, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 42-21 against the money line (+19.4 Units) in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 72.3, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 30-12 against the money line (+16.5 Units) in road games after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 72.1, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 42-16 against the money line (+18.1 Units) revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.6, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 77-37 against the money line (+32.0 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.7, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 53-24 against the money line (+24.7 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 78.3, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 51-24 against the money line (+21.7 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.9, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 98-41 against the money line (+26.8 Units) off a win against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 74.0, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 42-27 against the money line (+14.6 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 73.6, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 31-18 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 74.0, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 25-12 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.0, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 21-10 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.6, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 163-64 against the money line (+44.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.8, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 58-28 against the money line (+24.3 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 73.3, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 50-21 against the money line (+25.3 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 72.8, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 40-16 against the money line (+19.2 Units) in road games after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 73.7, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 83-25 against the money line (+28.1 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 77.2, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 146-63 against the money line (+34.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 74.7, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 103-39 against the money line (+27.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 74.5, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 84-51 against the money line (+21.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.7, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 111-59 against the money line (+30.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 74.2, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 163-84 against the money line (+30.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 74.8, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 25-6 against the money line (+14.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.5, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 82-75 against the money line (-22.5 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.2, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 14-26 against the money line (-16.5 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lin 71.7, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Michael is 16-13 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after 3 straight games with 45 or more rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 74.4, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 146-111 against the money line (+4.5 Units) in all games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 104-67 against the money line (+23.0 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.4, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 95-69 against the money line (+8.5 Units) after a division game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 69-52 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 85-62 against the money line (+9.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 121-89 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 13-3 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in home games vs. poor free throw shooting teams - making <=71% of their attempts as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 82.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 83-57 against the money line (+15.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 118-85 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 12-6 against the money line (+11.5 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 73.5, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 33-27 against the money line (+8.9 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.2, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 115-85 against the money line (+6.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.6, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 25-21 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.6, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 49-41 against the money line (+14.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 64-59 against the money line (+6.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 17-10 against the money line (+8.4 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 79.6, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 86 times, while the home underdog won straight up 75 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 3 times, while the home underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/17/2024 11:14:57 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|