| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES
NEW YORK |
|
|
156
| 68
Final
54 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 601 | LOS ANGELES | -200 | | 602 | NEW YORK | +170 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 3 consecutive division games against opponent after 2 consecutive non-conference games.
(151-134 since 1997.) (53%, +52.9 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after a loss by 10 points or more.
(79-26 since 1997.) (75.2%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better.
(62-28 since 1997.) (68.9%, +35.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 3 consecutive division games against opponent after 2 consecutive non-conference games.
(70-37 since 1997.) (65.4%, +29.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good free throw shooting team (76-80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher.
(50-27 since 1997.) (64.9%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good FT shooting team (76-80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher.
(32-17 since 1997.) (65.3%, +19.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(42-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.4%, +26.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(61-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.4%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(458-496 since 1997.) (48%, +100.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(256-260 since 1997.) (49.6%, +95.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more.
(241-93 since 1997.) (72.2%, +74.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(147-120 since 1997.) (55.1%, +67.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(227-94 since 1997.) (70.7%, +65.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games.
(75-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.4%, +59.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(173-63 since 1997.) (73.3%, +58.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(122-43 since 1997.) (73.9%, +56.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(218-99 since 1997.) (68.8%, +55.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(146-50 since 1997.) (74.5%, +52.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(156-65 since 1997.) (70.6%, +52.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(124-86 over the last 5 seasons.) (59%, +51.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(39-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (83%, +27.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(117-48 since 1997.) (70.9%, +47 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(77-18 since 1997.) (81.1%, +46.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, in July games.
(86-86 over the last 5 seasons.) (50%, +51.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(71-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.2%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games.
(36-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (87.8%, +28 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(88-29 since 1997.) (75.2%, +42.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - with a losing record, in July games.
(79-20 since 1997.) (79.8%, +40.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games.
(82-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.7%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(78-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +42.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(83-26 since 1997.) (76.1%, +37 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(111-81 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.8%, +58.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(67-16 since 1997.) (80.7%, +35.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in July games.
(45-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +34.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(62-14 since 1997.) (81.6%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games.
(33-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.2%, +24.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(77-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.1%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in July games.
(62-14 since 1997.) (81.6%, +34.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(169-87 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +74.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games.
(44-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.5%, +27.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(78-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.6%, +50.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(30-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (90.9%, +24.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(71-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.7%, +48.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(59-30 since 1997.) (66.3%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in July games.
(45-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +31.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(54-32 since 1997.) (62.8%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in May, June, or July games.
(65-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.3%, +29.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(49-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.3%, +22.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(53-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(53-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(53-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(55-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +30.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games.
(46-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +29.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(28-13 since 1997.) (68.3%, +17.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(40-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +24.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season.
(219-181 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.8%, +58.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(113-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +51.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(113-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +51.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(113-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +51.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more.
(39-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| LOS ANGELES | 74 | | 30-70 | 42.3% | 2-9 | 27.6% | 12-16 | 76.3% | 43 | 10 | 13 | | NEW YORK | 74 | | 29-66 | 43.8% | 4-11 | 34.0% | 13-17 | 76.4% | 44 | 9 | 16 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 491 times, while NEW YORK won 484 times.
Edge against the money line=NEW YORK |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 12-2 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in road games when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.4, OPPONENT 76.6 | LOS ANGELES is 107-56 against the money line (+33.9 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 70.7 | LOS ANGELES is 216-128 against the money line (+31.6 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 73.2 | NEW YORK is 8-17 against the money line (-11.2 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 70.5, OPPONENT 74.4 | NEW YORK is 61-85 against the money line (-33.7 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 68.6, OPPONENT 71.2 | NEW YORK is 4-9 against the money line (-7.7 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.6, OPPONENT 78.3 | NEW YORK is 40-66 against the money line (-31.2 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 70.7, OPPONENT 74.2 | NEW YORK is 2-8 against the money line (-6.8 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.8, OPPONENT 77.2 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 20-17 against the money line (-22.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.7, OPPONENT 79.2 | LOS ANGELES is 46-52 against the money line (-36.8 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.8, OPPONENT 74.4 | LOS ANGELES is 11-12 against the money line (-19.7 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 77.5 | LOS ANGELES is 12-14 against the money line (-21.8 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.8, OPPONENT 78.4 | LOS ANGELES is 63-65 against the money line (-40.5 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 74.6 | LOS ANGELES is 3-8 against the money line (-9.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.4, OPPONENT 89.6 | NEW YORK is 80-37 against the money line (+51.0 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.6, OPPONENT 70.4 |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK is 2-7 against the money line (-7.2 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 70.4, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 12-29 against the money line (-16.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 5-11 against the money line (-10.5 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 69.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 13-28 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.5, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 4-10 against the money line (-9.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 69.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 11-26 against the money line (-15.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 2-9 against the money line (-8.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.6, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 9-28 against the money line (-17.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.2, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 8-20 against the money line (-13.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 70.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 25-15 against the money line (-22.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-11.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.8, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-16 against the money line (-17.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-11 against the money line (-24.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-9 against the money line (-9.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-9 against the money line (-23.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-14 against the money line (-21.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-11 against the money line (-26.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-10.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-9 against the money line (-19.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-11.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.8, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-7 against the money line (-25.1 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-10 against the money line (-21.4 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 49-39 against the money line (+22.9 Units) in road games in July games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 31-22 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 23-9 against the money line (+14.1 Units) after a game giving up 4 or less offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 25-16 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.4, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 2-7 against the money line (-9.0 Units) in home games on Friday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 68.6, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 11-28 against the money line (-16.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 70.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 5-17 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 67.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 2-8 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 64.9, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 4-10 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 68.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 1-6 against the money line (-7.7 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 69.3, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 12-25 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 69.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 13-28 against the money line (-18.0 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 70.5, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 7-11 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-8 against the money line (-11.1 Units) as a favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-13 against the money line (-20.2 Units) as a road favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 23-23 against the money line (-18.9 Units) in road games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 23-23 against the money line (-18.9 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-21 against the money line (-19.8 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.3, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-11 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after a division game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-11 against the money line (-20.5 Units) after 2 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.3, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-13 against the money line (-23.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-6 against the money line (-7.6 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-6 against the money line (-7.6 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-7 against the money line (-8.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-8 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in road games after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-5 against the money line (-6.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-27 against the money line (-19.0 Units) in road games after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.5, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-7 against the money line (-8.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-7 against the money line (-10.1 Units) after playing a road game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.4, OPPONENT 89.9 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 25-19 against the money line (-20.4 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-9 against the money line (-12.7 Units) in road games after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.3, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 106-74 against the money line (+46.5 Units) off a road loss since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.5, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 7-2 against the money line (+8.1 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 89-83 against the money line (+22.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.1, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 106-95 against the money line (+24.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.5, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 66-56 against the money line (+25.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.2, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 11-7 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.6, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 85-75 against the money line (+22.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.6, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 100-44 against the money line (+35.1 Units) in home games after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.8, OPPONENT 67.7 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 155-139 against the money line (+29.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 70.9, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 7-11 | -11.6 | 7-11 | 9-8 | 78.9 | 41.3 | 45.3% | 40.8 | 80.3 | 38.8 | 45.8% | 40.0 | | Road Games | 4-5 | -3.4 | 4-5 | 5-3 | 80.7 | 43.0 | 44.6% | 41.8 | 82.2 | 38.8 | 45.2% | 41.6 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.7 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 81.2 | 44.0 | 45.2% | 40.2 | 82.4 | 37.6 | 48.6% | 39.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 78.9 | 41.3 | 32-70 | 45.3% | 3-8 | 30.9% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 41 | 10 | 19 | 18 | 10 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.4 | 39.3 | 29-66 | 44.5% | 5-14 | 33.8% | 15-19 | 78.5% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.7 | 43.0 | 32-73 | 44.6% | 2-8 | 28.6% | 14-18 | 75.3% | 42 | 11 | 19 | 19 | 11 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.3 | 38.8 | 30-65 | 45.8% | 5-15 | 35.2% | 15-18 | 82.4% | 40 | 8 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 78.9 | 38.8 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 5-15 | 34.1% | 15-19 | 79.7% | 40 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 82.2 | 38.8 | 30-67 | 45.2% | 5-15 | 32.8% | 17-19 | 89.6% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 16 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 7-12 | -6.6 | 6-12 | 8-11 | 74.0 | 37.0 | 43.4% | 42.3 | 76.0 | 40.0 | 41.7% | 42.2 | | Home Games | 6-4 | +0 | 4-5 | 6-4 | 76.4 | 39.6 | 44.6% | 42.3 | 74.7 | 40.7 | 41.7% | 40.8 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1.5 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 75.8 | 38.8 | 45.8% | 44.6 | 74.4 | 41.2 | 42.0% | 36.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 74.0 | 37.0 | 28-65 | 43.4% | 4-11 | 35.1% | 14-18 | 75.7% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.2 | 38.5 | 29-66 | 44.2% | 5-14 | 33.8% | 15-20 | 77.4% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 76.4 | 39.6 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 4-11 | 35.7% | 14-18 | 76.8% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.0 | 40.0 | 28-67 | 41.7% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 78.6% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 77.8 | 38.4 | 29-67 | 43.4% | 5-15 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 77.7% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 74.7 | 40.7 | 27-65 | 41.7% | 5-16 | 34.8% | 15-20 | 76.1% | 41 | 9 | 15 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 2 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 71.9, NEW YORK 70.1 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/1/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 84-92 | L | -210 | 32-97 | 33.0% | 50 | 15 | 31-76 | 40.8% | 65 | 29 | | 6/3/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 85-93 | L | -155 | 37-77 | 48.1% | 40 | 16 | 39-73 | 53.4% | 40 | 17 | | 6/6/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 102-88 | W | +145 | 43-77 | 55.8% | 38 | 10 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 41 | 17 | | 6/8/2014 | MINNESOTA | 72-85 | L | -165 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 41 | 16 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 50 | 14 | | 6/13/2014 | @ TULSA | 67-69 | L | -175 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 47 | 13 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 42 | 6 | | 6/14/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 74-101 | L | -140 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 35 | 19 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 29 | 11 | | 6/17/2014 | MINNESOTA | 77-94 | L | +100 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 35 | 12 | 37-58 | 63.8% | 35 | 13 | | 6/19/2014 | TULSA | 87-77 | W | -270 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 44 | 14 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 45 | 14 | | 6/22/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 69-72 | L | -270 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 47 | 22 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 30 | 10 | | 6/24/2014 | SEATTLE | 65-57 | W | -300 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 44 | 11 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 31 | 15 | | 6/28/2014 | @ TULSA | 92-89 | W | -105 | 36-76 | 47.4% | 46 | 11 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 47 | 16 | | 7/1/2014 | CHICAGO | 83-90 | L | -270 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 31 | 11 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 45 | 21 | | 7/3/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 70-56 | W | -125 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 36 | 14 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 35 | 18 | | 7/6/2014 | PHOENIX | 89-94 | L | +105 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 39 | 15 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 31 | 15 | | 7/8/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 72-83 | L | +155 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 49 | 8 | 33-61 | 54.1% | 38 | 8 | | 7/11/2014 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2014 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2014 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/23/2014 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2014 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/26/2014 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/5/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 75-87 | L | -155 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 35 | 21 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 37 | 13 | | 6/8/2014 | WASHINGTON | 81-64 | W | -200 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 45 | 13 | 19-57 | 33.3% | 33 | 13 | | 6/10/2014 | @ TULSA | 57-72 | L | +155 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 45 | 10 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 46 | 9 | | 6/13/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 75-83 | L | -250 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 41 | 10 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 43 | 10 | | 6/15/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 72-76 | L | -115 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 43 | 14 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 46 | 9 | | 6/18/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 100-105 | L | +105 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 45 | 17 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 44 | 10 | | 6/20/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 64-85 | L | +325 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 43 | 15 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 50 | 10 | | 6/22/2014 | ATLANTA | 85-78 | W | +170 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 40 | 16 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 56 | 15 | | 6/27/2014 | CHICAGO | 69-73 | L | +100 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 47 | 16 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 26 | 15 | | 6/29/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 67-65 | W | -155 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 41 | 15 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 49 | 16 | | 7/1/2014 | TULSA | 90-74 | W | -140 | 36-68 | 52.9% | 52 | 14 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 34 | 9 | | 7/6/2014 | MINNESOTA | 87-80 | W | +155 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 41 | 13 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 38 | 11 | | 7/9/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 66-80 | L | +155 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 42 | 15 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 36 | 10 | | 7/11/2014 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/16/2014 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/23/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2014 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/26/2014 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| NEW YORK is 18-18 (+4.6 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 3-1 (+0.8 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| NEW YORK is 11-8 (+1.9 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
| NEW YORK is 1-1 (+0.8 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/10/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 85 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 35-67 | 52.2% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 42 | 8 | 15 | | | NEW YORK | 67 | 153 | Under | 30 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 3-7 | 42.9% | 18-24 | 75.0% | 41 | 9 | 12 | 7/4/2013 | NEW YORK | 89 | 157 | ATS | 37 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 10-11 | 90.9% | 34 | 15 | 14 | | | LOS ANGELES | 97 | -13 | SU Over | 60 | 40-62 | 64.5% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 29 | 4 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Bill is 11-28 against the money line (-16.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 70.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 5-17 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 67.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 4-10 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 68.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 8-16 against the money line (-12.3 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 69.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 12-29 against the money line (-16.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 5-11 against the money line (-10.5 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 69.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 13-28 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.5, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 4-10 against the money line (-9.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 69.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 11-26 against the money line (-15.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 4-15 against the money line (-14.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.7, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Bill is 8-20 against the money line (-13.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 70.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Carol is 52-35 against the money line (-30.2 Units) in all games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.2, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 43-23 against the money line (-31.6 Units) as a favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.6, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 15-13 against the money line (-20.2 Units) as a road favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 23-23 against the money line (-18.9 Units) in road games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 23-23 against the money line (-18.9 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 18-21 against the money line (-19.8 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.3, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 30-23 against the money line (-23.5 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.5, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 35-24 against the money line (-21.8 Units) after a division game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 22-17 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 1-6 against the money line (-7.0 Units) in road games off a road loss by 10 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.1, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 2-8 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in road games after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Carol is 22-21 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.6, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 25-19 against the money line (-20.4 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 8-12 against the money line (-11.9 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 25-15 against the money line (-22.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 11-14 against the money line (-12.2 Units) in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.7, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 16-12 against the money line (-22.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 25-17 against the money line (-26.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 38-30 against the money line (-33.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.8, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 18-14 against the money line (-17.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.2, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 32-27 against the money line (-22.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.3, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 9-7 against the money line (-23.1 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 16-10 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 7-2 against the money line (+8.1 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 59-38 against the money line (+24.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 73.6, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 73-46 against the money line (+28.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 74.5, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 34-18 against the money line (+22.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 75.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 45-31 against the money line (+15.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 74.0, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 11-7 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.6, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 11-3 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in home games after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 77.1, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 37-25 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 77.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 17-11 against the money line (+11.9 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 72.6, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 89-58 against the money line (+20.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 71.1, OPPONENT 68.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 49-31 against the money line (+18.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 70.8, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 29 times, while the home underdog won straight up 16 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 8 times, while the home underdog won straight up 1 times.
Edge against the money line=LOS ANGELES |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [G] 05/16/2014 - Kamiko Williams out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/17/2024 5:04:24 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|