| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
SEATTLE
First Half Results
SAN ANTONIO |
|
|
72.5
| 47
Final
35 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 603 | SEATTLE | 72 | | 604 | SAN ANTONIO | -2.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(72-35 since 1997.) (67.3%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(48-20 since 1997.) (70.6%, +26 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a loss by 10 points or more.
(73-37 since 1997.) (66.4%, +32.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(27-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.4%, +19.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (SEATTLE) - off a loss against a division rival, on Friday nights.
(26-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +16.1 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 1 or more consecutive unders.
(443-288 since 1997.) (60.6%, +126.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(223-148 since 1997.) (60.1%, +60.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in July games.
(428-293 since 1997.) (59.4%, +105.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in May, June, or July games.
(927-719 since 1997.) (56.3%, +136.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - vs. division opponents.
(906-691 since 1997.) (56.7%, +145.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(438-310 since 1997.) (58.6%, +97 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games.
(234-156 since 1997.) (60%, +62.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning record on the season.
(210-141 since 1997.) (59.8%, +54.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(148-87 since 1997.) (63%, +52.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - off a home win.
(261-153 since 1997.) (63%, +92.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - off a home win, in May, June, or July games.
(166-97 since 1997.) (63.1%, +59.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(306-207 since 1997.) (59.6%, +78.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts.
(391-280 since 1997.) (58.3%, +83 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, in July games.
(141-84 since 1997.) (62.7%, +48.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, in May, June, or July games.
(227-152 since 1997.) (59.9%, +59.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game.
(226-141 since 1997.) (61.6%, +70.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games.
(128-71 since 1997.) (64.3%, +49.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game.
(309-203 since 1997.) (60.4%, +85.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games.
(177-108 since 1997.) (62.1%, +58.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(254-169 since 1997.) (60%, +68.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(226-135 since 1997.) (62.6%, +77.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(147-84 since 1997.) (63.6%, +54.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season.
(153-93 since 1997.) (62.2%, +50.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(725-552 since 1997.) (56.8%, +117.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(382-262 since 1997.) (59.3%, +93.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(242-158 since 1997.) (60.5%, +68.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in July games.
(270-156 since 1997.) (63.4%, +98.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in May, June, or July games.
(558-361 since 1997.) (60.7%, +160.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - vs. division opponents.
(524-346 since 1997.) (60.2%, +143.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(366-249 since 1997.) (59.5%, +92.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a division game.
(477-329 since 1997.) (59.2%, +115.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(319-222 since 1997.) (59%, +74.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, in May, June, or July games.
(208-135 since 1997.) (60.6%, +59.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games.
(155-96 since 1997.) (61.8%, +49.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(118-69 since 1997.) (63.1%, +42.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive unders.
(463-284 since 1997.) (62%, +150.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(151-88 since 1997.) (63.2%, +54.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(279-184 since 1997.) (60.3%, +76.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games.
(246-162 since 1997.) (60.3%, +67.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(71-36 since 1997.) (66.4%, +31.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games against opponent after having won 2 of their last 3 games.
(97-57 since 1997.) (63%, +34.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games against opponent after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(83-46 since 1997.) (64.3%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(93-50 since 1997.) (65%, +38 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(129-80 since 1997.) (61.7%, +41 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - in July games.
(428-293 since 1997.) (59.4%, +105.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - in May, June, or July games.
(927-719 since 1997.) (56.3%, +136.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - vs. division opponents.
(906-691 since 1997.) (56.7%, +145.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts.
(404-281 since 1997.) (59%, +94.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, in July games.
(129-78 since 1997.) (62.3%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, in May, June, or July games.
(227-151 since 1997.) (60.1%, +60.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games.
(132-81 since 1997.) (62%, +42.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game.
(302-204 since 1997.) (59.7%, +77.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games.
(174-112 since 1997.) (60.8%, +50.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws.
(303-201 since 1997.) (60.1%, +81.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in May, June, or July games.
(180-112 since 1997.) (61.6%, +56.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - being called for 18 or less fouls/game on the season, in July games.
(40-15 since 1997.) (72.7%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - being called for 18 or less fouls/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(69-36 since 1997.) (65.7%, +29.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - averaging 37 or less rebounds/game on the season.
(58-29 since 1997.) (66.7%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after playing a road game.
(392-259 since 1997.) (60.2%, +107.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(187-98 since 1997.) (65.6%, +79.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in July games.
(69-27 since 1997.) (71.9%, +39.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(115-55 since 1997.) (67.6%, +54.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents.
(118-70 since 1997.) (62.8%, +41 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games.
(145-75 since 1997.) (65.9%, +62.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in July games.
(59-21 since 1997.) (73.8%, +35.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(93-42 since 1997.) (68.9%, +46.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents.
(91-50 since 1997.) (64.5%, +36 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games.
(108-51 since 1997.) (67.9%, +51.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(64-25 since 1997.) (71.9%, +36.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents.
(68-31 since 1997.) (68.7%, +33.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in July games.
(60-22 since 1997.) (73.2%, +35.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in May, June, or July games.
(75-42 since 1997.) (64.1%, +28.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games.
(275-194 since 1997.) (58.6%, +61.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after playing a road game.
(657-506 since 1997.) (56.5%, +100.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(294-202 since 1997.) (59.3%, +71.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in July games.
(103-53 since 1997.) (66%, +44.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(175-110 since 1997.) (61.4%, +54 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents.
(197-129 since 1997.) (60.4%, +55.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(133-83 since 1997.) (61.6%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games.
(157-98 since 1997.) (61.6%, +49.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(89-49 since 1997.) (64.5%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents.
(107-58 since 1997.) (64.8%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games.
(219-146 since 1997.) (60%, +58.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in July games.
(92-39 since 1997.) (70.2%, +49.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in May, June, or July games.
(122-73 since 1997.) (62.6%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, with a losing record.
(95-53 since 1997.) (64.2%, +36.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, with a winning record on the season.
(150-92 since 1997.) (62%, +48.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(258-157 since 1997.) (62.2%, +85.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning record on the season.
(222-133 since 1997.) (62.5%, +75.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(156-91 since 1997.) (63.2%, +55.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games.
(137-77 since 1997.) (64%, +52.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning record on the season.
(124-70 since 1997.) (63.9%, +47 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(87-45 since 1997.) (65.9%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - with a winning record on the season.
(385-253 since 1997.) (60.3%, +106.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - with a winning record on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(217-144 since 1997.) (60.1%, +58.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(272-177 since 1997.) (60.6%, +77.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(137-83 since 1997.) (62.3%, +45.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(103-60 since 1997.) (63.2%, +37 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in July games.
(270-156 since 1997.) (63.4%, +98.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in May, June, or July games.
(558-361 since 1997.) (60.7%, +160.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - vs. division opponents.
(524-346 since 1997.) (60.2%, +143.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(51-23 since 1997.) (68.9%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(299-175 since 1997.) (63.1%, +106.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(77-38 since 1997.) (67%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games.
(155-96 since 1997.) (61.8%, +49.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(98-59 since 1997.) (62.4%, +33.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(158-96 since 1997.) (62.2%, +52.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws.
(310-194 since 1997.) (61.5%, +96.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in May, June, or July games.
(180-103 since 1997.) (63.6%, +66.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season.
(63-28 since 1997.) (69.2%, +32.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - poor offensive rebounding team - averaging <=9/game on the season, in July games.
(48-21 since 1997.) (69.6%, +24.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - poor offensive rebounding team - averaging <=9/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(82-46 since 1997.) (64.1%, +31.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(121-71 since 1997.) (63%, +42.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season.
(381-263 since 1997.) (59.2%, +91.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(216-143 since 1997.) (60.2%, +58.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in July games.
(50-20 since 1997.) (71.4%, +28 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games.
(82-38 since 1997.) (68.3%, +40.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after playing a home game.
(395-252 since 1997.) (61.1%, +117.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(433-273 since 1997.) (61.3%, +132.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(156-99 since 1997.) (61.2%, +47.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(193-125 since 1997.) (60.7%, +55.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after successfully covering the spread in 5 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season.
(26-6 since 1997.) (81.2%, +19.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(429-269 since 1997.) (61.5%, +133.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(144-87 since 1997.) (62.3%, +48.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(281-166 since 1997.) (62.9%, +98.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games.
(284-174 since 1997.) (62%, +92.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games.
(198-126 since 1997.) (61.1%, +59.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| SEATTLE | 71 | | 35 | | 27-60 | 44.8% | 6-18 | 34.8% | 11-14 | 78.7% | 40 | 7 | 16 | | SAN ANTONIO | 77 | | 39 | | 29-67 | 43.1% | 6-18 | 35.7% | 13-16 | 83.0% | 39 | 9 | 10 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, SAN ANTONIO covered the first half line 526 times, while SEATTLE covered the first half line 474 times.
No Edge. | In 1000 simulated games, 552 games went over first half total, while 419 games went under first half total.
Edge against first half total=Over |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
SEATTLE is 60-40 against the 1rst half line (+16.0 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.9, OPPONENT 33.8 | SEATTLE is 19-9 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.1, OPPONENT 37.4 | SEATTLE is 34-21 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.6, OPPONENT 34.7 | SAN ANTONIO is 35-58 against the 1rst half line (-28.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 38.2 | SAN ANTONIO is 41-67 against the 1rst half line (-32.7 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.6, OPPONENT 36.8 |
|
SAN ANTONIO is 44-26 against the 1rst half line (+15.4 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.2, OPPONENT 32.6 |
|
SEATTLE is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.1, OPPONENT 37.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 101-74 OVER (+19.6 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.9, OPPONENT 39.4 |
|
SEATTLE is 132-79 UNDER (+45.1 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they attempt 57 to 63 shots since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.9, OPPONENT 34.0 | SEATTLE is 14-4 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.1, OPPONENT 35.0 | SEATTLE is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.4, OPPONENT 34.1 | SEATTLE is 79-47 UNDER (+27.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.8, OPPONENT 34.0 | SEATTLE is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 28.7, OPPONENT 35.0 | SEATTLE is 57-36 UNDER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they grab 7 or less offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.6, OPPONENT 35.2 | SEATTLE is 84-37 UNDER (+43.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit 3 to 6 more turnovers than their opponents since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.9, OPPONENT 34.3 | SEATTLE is 101-55 UNDER (+40.5 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.4, OPPONENT 33.0 | SEATTLE is 85-53 UNDER (+26.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.0, OPPONENT 34.6 | SEATTLE is 65-29 UNDER (+33.1 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.6, OPPONENT 33.8 | SEATTLE is 10-3 UNDER (+6.7 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.5, OPPONENT 33.6 | SAN ANTONIO is 48-21 UNDER (+24.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.2, OPPONENT 32.6 | SAN ANTONIO is 52-33 UNDER (+15.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 35.5 | SAN ANTONIO is 76-53 UNDER (+17.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 35.7 |
|
| | | | |
|
SEATTLE is 20-9 against the 1rst half line (+10.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.7, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 32-19 against the 1rst half line (+11.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.5, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 17-7 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.5, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 23-11 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 29-15 against the 1rst half line (+12.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 28-51 against the 1rst half line (-28.1 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 16-30 against the 1rst half line (-17.0 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.2, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 16-31 against the 1rst half line (-18.1 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 12-26 against the 1rst half line (-16.6 Units) in home games versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.0, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
SAN ANTONIO is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.6, OPPONENT 32.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.4, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.2, OPPONENT 31.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 139-102 UNDER (+26.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.1, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 53-31 UNDER (+18.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.3, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 44-23 UNDER (+18.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.0, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 151-113 UNDER (+26.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.0, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 37-18 UNDER (+17.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.2, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 87-60 UNDER (+21.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.5, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 47-23 UNDER (+21.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.6, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 120-84 UNDER (+27.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.7, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 161-121 UNDER (+27.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 125-85 UNDER (+31.5 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.1, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 119-82 UNDER (+28.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.1, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 172-116 UNDER (+44.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.0, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 158-117 UNDER (+29.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.6, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 238-161 UNDER (+60.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.4, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 25-10 UNDER (+14.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.8, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.8, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 50-26 UNDER (+21.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.3, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 64-39 UNDER (+21.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.4, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.8, OPPONENT 32.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.3, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 24-10 UNDER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total vs. horrible rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 5+/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.4, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 51-31 UNDER (+16.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.3, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 150-98 UNDER (+42.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 145-110 UNDER (+24.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 66-41 UNDER (+20.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.4, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 93-54 UNDER (+33.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.1, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.2, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.0, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.0, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 16-5 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.0, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.6, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.5, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 14-4 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 23-10 UNDER (+12.0 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.2, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 8-2 UNDER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.6, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 16-5 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.4, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 29-13 UNDER (+14.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.2, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 59-38 UNDER (+17.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.7, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 8-2 UNDER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.7, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 15-5 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.6, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 15-3 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.2, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) in road games on Friday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.9, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 31-18 against the 1rst half line (+11.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.3, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 68-97 against the 1rst half line (-38.7 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.9, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 52-81 against the 1rst half line (-37.1 Units) as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.2, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 66-91 against the 1rst half line (-34.1 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.3, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 48-70 against the 1rst half line (-29.0 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.2, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 25-44 against the 1rst half line (-23.4 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.9, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 17-32 against the 1rst half line (-18.2 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.8, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 8-23 against the 1rst half line (-17.3 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.2, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 3-10 against the 1rst half line (-8.0 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.3, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) in road games revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.4, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 40.5, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
SAN ANTONIO is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 41.9, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 33-21 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.3, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 25-15 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.8, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 121-79 UNDER (+34.1 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.9, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.2, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 159-99 UNDER (+50.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.7, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 98-66 UNDER (+25.4 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.4, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 29.9, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 24-12 UNDER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.3, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 201-136 UNDER (+51.4 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.6, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 36-21 UNDER (+12.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.3, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 157-104 UNDER (+42.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.3, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 21-11 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.2, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 29.6, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.8, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 17-8 UNDER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.9, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.6, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 10-0 UNDER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.9, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 10-0 UNDER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.9, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 15-4 UNDER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a home loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.3, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 17-8 UNDER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.7, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 13-5 UNDER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.3, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 15-3 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.5, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 10-0 UNDER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 29.9, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 5*) | SEATTLE is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 9-0 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.2, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 5*) | SEATTLE is 8-0 UNDER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 30.8, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 17-4 UNDER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.8, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 15-5 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.8, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.5, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 9-0 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a blowout loss by 15 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.4, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 25-13 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.4, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 11-1 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.6, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 11-1 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.6, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 20-6 UNDER (+13.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.3, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 23-5 UNDER (+17.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.5, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 32-16 UNDER (+14.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.2, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 35-19 UNDER (+14.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.4, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 24-14 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 50-31 UNDER (+15.9 Units) the 1rst half total on Friday since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 23-11 UNDER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 14-4 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.1, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 114-82 UNDER (+23.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.7, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.6, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 35-18 UNDER (+15.2 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 55-28 UNDER (+24.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a win by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.8, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.2, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 10-1 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 4*) | SAN ANTONIO is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 8-2 UNDER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.2, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 8-13 | -1.5 | 8-12 | 10-10 | 70.2 | 33.2 | 43.2% | 36.1 | 74.7 | 36.2 | 45.1% | 39.0 | | Road Games | 3-10 | -5 | 5-7 | 6-7 | 68.5 | 32.6 | 42.9% | 35.1 | 75.4 | 35.0 | 45.4% | 38.8 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +0.1 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 68.8 | 30.4 | 44.9% | 35.2 | 73.2 | 38.0 | 44.8% | 40.0 | | Division Games | 4-9 | -2.4 | 5-8 | 5-7 | 68.7 | 31.3 | 43.2% | 35.8 | 74.8 | 37.6 | 45.5% | 38.5 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 70.2 | 33.2 | 25-59 | 43.2% | 6-17 | 35.1% | 14-17 | 78.9% | 36 | 7 | 17 | 17 | 6 | 14 | 2 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.4 | 39 | 29-67 | 43.9% | 5-15 | 34.0% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 68.5 | 32.6 | 25-58 | 42.9% | 6-17 | 34.5% | 13-16 | 80.2% | 35 | 6 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 1 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.7 | 36.2 | 29-64 | 45.1% | 4-13 | 30.0% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 39 | 9 | 16 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 79.5 | 39.5 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 5-14 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 79.1% | 41 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 75.4 | 35.0 | 29-64 | 45.4% | 3-12 | 27.8% | 14-17 | 82.7% | 39 | 9 | 17 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 11-9 | +5 | 12-8 | 10-10 | 77.8 | 38.1 | 42.4% | 37.1 | 78.0 | 38.2 | 46.8% | 42.5 | | Home Games | 4-5 | -3.8 | 3-6 | 6-3 | 80.2 | 38.6 | 41.4% | 37.0 | 79.3 | 40.6 | 47.4% | 43.7 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +4.2 | 5-0 | 1-4 | 76.4 | 36.4 | 42.7% | 38.6 | 72.6 | 33.2 | 40.5% | 42.4 | | Division Games | 6-6 | +2.9 | 5-7 | 9-3 | 79.0 | 38.1 | 42.2% | 36.7 | 81.1 | 39.5 | 48.9% | 42.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 77.8 | 38.1 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 7-18 | 38.3% | 15-18 | 82.7% | 37 | 8 | 18 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.6 | 38.6 | 29-66 | 43.7% | 5-15 | 34.1% | 15-19 | 78.5% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.2 | 38.6 | 28-68 | 41.4% | 7-19 | 38.4% | 16-19 | 88.6% | 37 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.0 | 38.2 | 30-65 | 46.8% | 4-14 | 31.5% | 13-17 | 76.9% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 78.3 | 38.9 | 29-66 | 44.7% | 4-14 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 77.9% | 41 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 79.3 | 40.6 | 31-66 | 47.4% | 5-15 | 30.1% | 12-16 | 76.0% | 44 | 10 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: SEATTLE 72, SAN ANTONIO 71.9 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/1/2014 | TULSA | 62-60 | 37-36 | -2 | L | 73.5 | U | 25-60 | 41.7% | 34 | 11 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 40 | 15 | | 6/3/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 72-87 | 34-43 | 6.5 | L | 72.5 | O | 26-63 | 41.3% | 34 | 14 | 33-62 | 53.2% | 37 | 11 | | 6/6/2014 | MINNESOTA | 65-62 | 32-40 | 3 | L | 73 | U | 22-56 | 39.3% | 36 | 14 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 36 | 11 | | 6/10/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 80-76 | 42-30 | 1.5 | W | 70.5 | O | 27-60 | 45.0% | 41 | 13 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 41 | 10 | | 6/11/2014 | @ INDIANA | 68-76 | 36-30 | 3.5 | W | 68.5 | U | 23-49 | 46.9% | 30 | 13 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 33 | 12 | | 6/13/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 79-72 | 43-28 | 3 | W | 71.5 | U | 33-58 | 56.9% | 32 | 16 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 36 | 12 | | 6/15/2014 | @ TULSA | 79-85 | 39-41 | 3.5 | W | 72 | O | 29-55 | 52.7% | 29 | 11 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 40 | 8 | | 6/19/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 82-87 | 27-35 | -1.5 | L | 73 | U | 29-65 | 44.6% | 47 | 12 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 45 | 6 | | 6/22/2014 | WASHINGTON | 89-86 | 45-41 | -2 | W | 69.5 | O | 31-72 | 43.1% | 45 | 8 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 35 | 11 | | 6/24/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 57-65 | 26-32 | 3.5 | L | 73 | U | 21-58 | 36.2% | 31 | 15 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 44 | 11 | | 6/27/2014 | MINNESOTA | 81-71 | 33-26 | 3.5 | W | 73 | U | 28-59 | 47.5% | 40 | 13 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 40 | 6 | | 6/29/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 69-74 | 32-42 | 5 | L | 72.5 | O | 27-61 | 44.3% | 29 | 15 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 48 | 18 | | 7/3/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 56-70 | 22-40 | 1 | L | 73 | U | 23-58 | 39.7% | 35 | 18 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 36 | 14 | | 7/5/2014 | CHICAGO | 80-73 | 45-45 | -1.5 | L | 72.5 | O | 28-55 | 50.9% | 29 | 5 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 46 | 10 | | 7/9/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 58-78 | 20-37 | 6 | L | 75 | U | 25-59 | 42.4% | 43 | 20 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 30 | 6 | | 7/11/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2014 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/22/2014 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2014 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/26/2014 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/1/2014 | MINNESOTA | 79-87 | 45-52 | 1.5 | L | 76.5 | O | 29-62 | 46.8% | 29 | 10 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 44 | 11 | | 6/5/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 87-75 | 47-46 | 1.5 | W | 72.5 | O | 33-65 | 50.8% | 37 | 13 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 35 | 21 | | 6/7/2014 | PHOENIX | 79-91 | 33-35 | 1.5 | L | 78.5 | U | 25-90 | 27.8% | 52 | 11 | 36-82 | 43.9% | 66 | 20 | | 6/13/2014 | SEATTLE | 72-79 | 28-43 | -3 | L | 71.5 | U | 26-63 | 41.3% | 36 | 12 | 33-58 | 56.9% | 32 | 16 | | 6/14/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 101-74 | 49-44 | 1.5 | W | 76 | O | 34-62 | 54.8% | 29 | 11 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 35 | 19 | | 6/19/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 87-82 | 35-27 | 1.5 | W | 73 | U | 30-73 | 41.1% | 45 | 6 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 47 | 12 | | 6/22/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 72-69 | 40-38 | 3.5 | W | 78.5 | U | 28-67 | 41.8% | 30 | 10 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 47 | 22 | | 6/24/2014 | WASHINGTON | 70-81 | 33-36 | -3 | L | 75 | U | 27-69 | 39.1% | 37 | 8 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 40 | 9 | | 6/26/2014 | ATLANTA | 79-81 | 42-45 | 1.5 | L | 80.5 | O | 27-64 | 42.2% | 37 | 16 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 46 | 13 | | 6/29/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 73-65 | 40-32 | 1.5 | W | 73.5 | U | 26-65 | 40.0% | 42 | 7 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 43 | 12 | | 7/1/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 74-71 | 27-30 | 2 | L | 75.5 | U | 27-61 | 44.3% | 33 | 15 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 47 | 19 | | 7/3/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 84-91 | 35-41 | 4.5 | L | 77 | U | 30-66 | 45.5% | 43 | 12 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 38 | 7 | | 7/5/2014 | @ INDIANA | 71-70 | 38-34 | 2 | W | 74.5 | U | 24-61 | 39.3% | 39 | 11 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 42 | 14 | | 7/9/2014 | NEW YORK | 80-66 | 42-29 | -2 | W | 75 | U | 31-70 | 44.3% | 36 | 10 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 42 | 15 | | 7/11/2014 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2014 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2014 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/22/2014 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/25/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/26/2014 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| SEATTLE is 29-24 versus the first half line when playing against SAN ANTONIO since 1997 | | 32 of 52 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| SEATTLE is 6-5 versus the first half line when playing against SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons | | 6 of 11 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| SAN ANTONIO is 13-13 versus the first half line when playing against SEATTLE since 1997 | | 15 of 24 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| SAN ANTONIO is 3-3 versus the first half line when playing against SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 6 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/19/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 87 | 148.5 | SU ATS | 35 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 10-17 | 58.8% | 17-22 | 77.3% | 45 | 8 | 6 | | | SEATTLE | 82 | -3 | Over | 27 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 16-24 | 66.7% | 47 | 7 | 12 | 6/13/2014 | SEATTLE | 79 | 145 | SU ATS | 43 | 33-58 | 56.9% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 8-11 | 72.7% | 32 | 2 | 16 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 72 | -6 | Over | 28 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 3-18 | 16.7% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 36 | 11 | 12 | 8/27/2013 | SEATTLE | 72 | -1.5 | SU Over | 31 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 8-16 | 50.0% | 10-15 | 66.7% | 43 | 11 | 17 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 71 | 137 | ATS | 31 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 5-24 | 20.8% | 18-24 | 75.0% | 35 | 10 | 10 | 8/25/2013 | SEATTLE | 64 | 139.5 | Under | 24 | 19-53 | 35.8% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 20-23 | 87.0% | 36 | 8 | 15 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 70 | 0 | SU ATS | 34 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 44 | 14 | 14 | 8/11/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 63 | 139 | Under | 26 | 23-68 | 33.8% | 6-26 | 23.1% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 38 | 9 | 10 | | | SEATTLE | 69 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 56 | 15 | 11 | 8/9/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 77 | 142 | SU ATS | 47 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 34 | 4 | 10 | | | SEATTLE | 56 | -7 | Under | 29 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 8-23 | 34.8% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 33 | 5 | 20 | 6/21/2013 | SEATTLE | 91 | 143.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 6-9 | 66.7% | 23-25 | 92.0% | 34 | 6 | 10 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 86 | -6 | Over | 37 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 32 | 8 | 9 |
|
| | |
|
Brian is 28-17 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) on Friday as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.8, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 75-60 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.6, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 27-13 against the 1rst half line (+12.7 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.9, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 49-34 against the 1rst half line (+11.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 52-35 against the 1rst half line (+13.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 58-37 against the 1rst half line (+17.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.9, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 48-32 against the 1rst half line (+12.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.2, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 75-55 against the 1rst half line (+14.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.6, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 46-28 against the 1rst half line (+15.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.2, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 63-40 against the 1rst half line (+19.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.3, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 70-49 against the 1rst half line (+16.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.0, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 106-87 against the 1rst half line (+10.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 49-34 against the 1rst half line (+11.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.7, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 73-49 against the 1rst half line (+19.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 29-17 against the 1rst half line (+10.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.8, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 46-32 against the 1rst half line (+10.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.3, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 69-53 against the 1rst half line (+10.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.5, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 66-52 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.3, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 101-81 against the 1rst half line (+11.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.7, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 35-22 against the 1rst half line (+10.8 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.6, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 103-86 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 92-78 against the 1rst half line (+6.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 31-18 against the 1rst half line (+11.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 44-27 against the 1rst half line (+14.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.3, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 57-77 against the 1rst half line (-27.7 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.4, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 41-62 against the 1rst half line (-27.2 Units) as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 68-85 against the 1rst half line (-25.5 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 58-75 against the 1rst half line (-24.5 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.6, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 38-54 against the 1rst half line (-21.4 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.2, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 34-51 against the 1rst half line (-22.1 Units) in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 38-56 against the 1rst half line (-23.6 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.0, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 21-38 against the 1rst half line (-20.8 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.0, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 15-27 against the 1rst half line (-14.7 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.3, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 29-44 against the 1rst half line (-19.4 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.7, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 29-44 against the 1rst half line (-19.4 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.2, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 63-79 against the 1rst half line (-23.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 27-41 against the 1rst half line (-18.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 21-37 against the 1rst half line (-19.7 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.2, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 30-42 against the 1rst half line (-16.2 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 41-53 against the 1rst half line (-17.3 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.4, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 10-19 against the 1rst half line (-10.9 Units) in home games versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.4, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Brian is 15-25 against the 1rst half line (-12.5 Units) in road games revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.4, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) in road games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.1, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 6-17 against the 1rst half line (-12.7 Units) in road games revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.2, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 104-91 against the 1rst half line (+3.9 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.3, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 82-66 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Brian is 143-97 UNDER (+36.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.7, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 68-44 UNDER (+19.6 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.7, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 58-35 UNDER (+19.5 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.2, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 40-18 UNDER (+20.2 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.3, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 27-7 UNDER (+19.3 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.7, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 76-46 UNDER (+25.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.7, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 44-27 UNDER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.9, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 64-42 UNDER (+17.8 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.2, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 64-31 UNDER (+29.9 Units) the 1rst half total in July games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.7, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 85-54 UNDER (+25.6 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 88-67 UNDER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 83-65 UNDER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.7, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 91-63 UNDER (+21.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 79-60 UNDER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.6, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 21-5 UNDER (+15.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 31.1, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 40-28 UNDER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.4, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 66-42 UNDER (+19.8 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.2, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 42-28 UNDER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 25-14 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.9, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 52-28 UNDER (+21.2 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.0, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 18-9 UNDER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.6, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 15-2 UNDER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.2, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 20-8 UNDER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a home loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.4, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 55-40 UNDER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.3, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 17-8 UNDER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.2, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 36-19 UNDER (+15.1 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.6, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 26-14 UNDER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss against a division rival as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.7, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 20-9 UNDER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 47-23 UNDER (+21.7 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.2, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 23-11 UNDER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss by 10 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.6, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 59-26 UNDER (+30.4 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 59-32 UNDER (+23.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 30-16 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.2, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 18-8 UNDER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a blowout loss by 15 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.4, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 42-20 UNDER (+20.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.4, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 65-42 UNDER (+18.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.4, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 57-32 UNDER (+21.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.1, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 76-41 UNDER (+30.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.0, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 23-7 UNDER (+15.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where they had 5 or less steals in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.6, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 69-41 UNDER (+23.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 61-33 UNDER (+24.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.9, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 57-43 UNDER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.5, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 53-32 UNDER (+17.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.4, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 32-17 UNDER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.4, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 24-14 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.1, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 73-56 UNDER (+11.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.6, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 44-32 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.2, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 59-45 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.3, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 48-34 UNDER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.9, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 70-51 UNDER (+13.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.0, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 58-40 UNDER (+14.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.6, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 75-56 UNDER (+13.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.3, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 114-80 UNDER (+26.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 68-52 UNDER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 34-18 UNDER (+14.2 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.3, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 72-45 UNDER (+22.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.0, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 71-52 UNDER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.5, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 67-53 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.3, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 108-74 UNDER (+26.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.7, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 45-26 UNDER (+16.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.2, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 35-22 UNDER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.6, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 74-58 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 112-78 UNDER (+26.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 67-52 UNDER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.2, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 67-52 UNDER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.3, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 100-69 UNDER (+24.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 26-16 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.3, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 76-53 UNDER (+17.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.5, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 55-33 UNDER (+18.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.3, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 174-128 UNDER (+33.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 75-59 UNDER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.4, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 58-45 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 41-28 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 82-69 UNDER (+6.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 53-27 UNDER (+23.3 Units) the 1rst half total in July games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.6, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 114-71 UNDER (+35.9 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.7, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 37-25 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total on Friday as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 177-126 UNDER (+38.4 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 35.4, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 68-37 UNDER (+27.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 45-23 UNDER (+19.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.4, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 126-95 UNDER (+21.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 35.0, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 74-60 UNDER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 46-27 UNDER (+16.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.0, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 84-63 UNDER (+14.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 78-55 UNDER (+17.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 33.6, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 86-59 UNDER (+21.1 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.1, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 59-31 UNDER (+24.9 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.0, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 79-40 UNDER (+35.0 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.3, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 41-23 UNDER (+15.7 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 35.6, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 26-13 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win by 10 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.2, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 46-33 UNDER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 44-22 UNDER (+19.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 76-53 UNDER (+17.7 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.3, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 31-20 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.9, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 86-64 UNDER (+15.6 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 59-42 UNDER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.3, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 75-57 UNDER (+12.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.9, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 57-43 UNDER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 81-65 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 89-57 UNDER (+26.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.6, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 40-24 UNDER (+13.6 Units) the 1rst half total after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.9, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 82-59 UNDER (+17.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 69-40 UNDER (+25.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.7, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 43-31 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.4, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 71-46 UNDER (+20.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.2, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 30-14 UNDER (+14.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 108-76 UNDER (+24.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.7, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 92-75 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 61-39 UNDER (+18.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.3, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 73-45 UNDER (+23.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 35.8, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 80-48 UNDER (+27.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 58-39 UNDER (+15.1 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 87-60 UNDER (+21.0 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 58-39 UNDER (+15.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 94-55 UNDER (+33.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.7, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 89-75 UNDER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.7, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 136-106 UNDER (+19.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.2, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 47-26 UNDER (+18.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.3, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 46-27 UNDER (+16.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.9, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 52-34 UNDER (+14.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 44-26 UNDER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.6, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 37 or less rebounds/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 31.1, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 71-57 UNDER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.4, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 106-85 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.8, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 38-23 UNDER (+12.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.7, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 39-21 UNDER (+15.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 41-23 UNDER (+15.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.8, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 67-39 UNDER (+24.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.4, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 172 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 144 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 8 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 7 times. |
|
|
| |
|
Since 1997, 96 games went under the first half total, while 52 games went over the first half total.
Edge against the first half total=Under | Over the last 3 seasons, 5 games went over the first half total, while 1 games went under the first half total.
Edge against the first half total=Over |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 24 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 12 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 2 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 2 times. | | Since 1997, 19 games went under the first half total, while 17 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 3 games went under the first half total, while 1 games went over the first half total. |
|
| | |
| [F] 05/25/2013 - Lauren Jackson out for season ( Achilles ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/2/2024 1:08:50 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|