| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT NEW YORK |
|
| 163 | 94 Final 89 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
605 | CONNECTICUT | +145 | 606 | NEW YORK | -165 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents. (49-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (62%, +28.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more. (95-31 since 1997.) (75.4%, +48.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more. (93-31 since 1997.) (75%, +46.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (96-63 since 1997.) (60.4%, +42.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season. (46-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.3%, +28.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off an upset win as an underdog. (108-73 since 1997.) (59.7%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more. (65-19 since 1997.) (77.4%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more. (65-19 since 1997.) (77.4%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (72-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.3%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (124-57 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +53.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents. (34-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (68%, +24.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (59-16 since 1997.) (78.7%, +36.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (57-16 since 1997.) (78.1%, +34.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents. (47-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +27.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more. (86-52 since 1997.) (62.3%, +32.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents. (63-30 since 1997.) (67.7%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (36-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.9%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (49-13 since 1997.) (79%, +29.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - hot team - having covered 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (29-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.7%, +24.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (47-13 since 1997.) (78.3%, +27.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (98-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.1%, +42.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (29-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.4%, +22.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (32-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (91.4%, +27.8 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents. (37-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +30.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (47-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.9%, +28.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going over the total by more than 24 points in their previous game against opponent after going over the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games. (39-21 since 1997.) (65%, +23.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (42-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +26.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (40-19 since 1997.) (67.8%, +23.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days. (79-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.7%, +35.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (63-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +28.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going over the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (45-23 since 1997.) (66.2%, +21.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going over the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games against opponent after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games. (34-15 since 1997.) (69.4%, +21 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by more than 12 points in two consecutive games, vs. division opponents. (31-15 since 1997.) (67.4%, +18 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (50-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (55-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.6%, +34.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (48-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +34 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (22-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (88%, +18.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (35-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (92.1%, +30.8 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (76-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +35.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (81-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +25.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (65-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.9%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games. (24-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +10.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (40-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (87%, +25.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a win by 6 points or less. (36-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +28.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (25-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.3%, +21.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, playing with 3 or more days rest. (39-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.9%, +27.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (48-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (37-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +18.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (105-78 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.4%, +29.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (25-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +12.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (34-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (87.2%, +22.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (27-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (87.1%, +21.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (60-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (82-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.9%, +30.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (43-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.5%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 80 points or more. (25-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.3%, +21.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset win as a road underdog, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (36-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.9%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (46-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +18.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (51-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (28-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +15.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games against opponent after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games. (43-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more. (109-76 since 1997.) (58.9%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (101-60 since 1997.) (62.7%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (89-68 since 1997.) (56.7%, +32.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, on Friday nights. (52-28 since 1997.) (65%, +29.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (105-78 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.4%, +29.4 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT | 83 | | 31-73 | 43.1% | 7-17 | 39.3% | 14-19 | 71.6% | 45 | 13 | 12 | NEW YORK | 82 | | 29-66 | 43.1% | 5-15 | 33.5% | 19-25 | 77.9% | 46 | 12 | 14 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 542 times, while NEW YORK won 425 times. Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 31-35 against the money line (+16.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 80.8 | CONNECTICUT is 85-66 against the money line (+18.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.6, OPPONENT 75.7 | CONNECTICUT is 16-9 against the money line (+15.2 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 77.7 | CONNECTICUT is 6-4 against the money line (+11.9 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 81.1 | CONNECTICUT is 72-40 against the money line (+27.2 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 74.6 | CONNECTICUT is 13-9 against the money line (+14.4 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.1, OPPONENT 79.1 | CONNECTICUT is 82-64 against the money line (+20.0 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 74.0 | CONNECTICUT is 17-11 against the money line (+20.5 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.5, OPPONENT 84.8 | CONNECTICUT is 5-0 against the money line (+7.7 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 96.0, OPPONENT 79.2 | CONNECTICUT is 21-18 against the money line (+13.3 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 78.5 | NEW YORK is 69-93 against the money line (-37.0 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 69.6, OPPONENT 72.0 | NEW YORK is 15-25 against the money line (-17.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 80.9, OPPONENT 86.4 | NEW YORK is 18-91 against the money line (-79.0 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 78.5, OPPONENT 89.5 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 43-72 against the money line (-38.7 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.9, OPPONENT 77.0 | CONNECTICUT is 55-67 against the money line (-32.6 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.4, OPPONENT 77.9 | CONNECTICUT is 27-44 against the money line (-25.5 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.0, OPPONENT 79.5 | CONNECTICUT is 54-145 against the money line (-123.3 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 86.5 | NEW YORK is 37-19 against the money line (+18.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 80.9, OPPONENT 78.2 | NEW YORK is 12-7 against the money line (+9.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 78.6, OPPONENT 80.4 | NEW YORK is 10-1 against the money line (+14.1 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 88.4, OPPONENT 83.7 | NEW YORK is 15-2 against the money line (+15.7 Units) when they attempt 23 to 27 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 79.6, OPPONENT 72.9 | NEW YORK is 90-46 against the money line (+48.3 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.1, OPPONENT 69.3 | NEW YORK is 85-59 against the money line (+31.4 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 73.4, OPPONENT 71.6 | NEW YORK is 84-66 against the money line (+23.1 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.3, OPPONENT 71.8 | NEW YORK is 21-12 against the money line (+10.6 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 84.8, OPPONENT 85.0 | NEW YORK is 74-22 against the money line (+61.7 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 79.8, OPPONENT 73.5 | NEW YORK is 24-6 against the money line (+20.2 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 87.4, OPPONENT 81.4 | NEW YORK is 15-9 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 79.8, OPPONENT 79.5 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 10-5 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.8, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-6 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.1, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-12 against the money line (+18.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-16 against the money line (+13.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-16 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-21 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-9 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-12 against the money line (+17.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 2-9 against the money line (-8.4 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 74.6, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 27-47 against the money line (-25.6 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.8, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 21-13 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 83.1, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 31-16 against the money line (+16.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 76.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 39-22 against the money line (+15.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 77.6, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 23-11 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 83.8, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 8-6 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 77.5, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 22-13 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 83.1, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 21-13 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 83.3, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 84-54 against the money line (+31.3 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.3, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 37-22 against the money line (+13.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 78.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 19-7 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-9 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in June games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-13 against the money line (+16.0 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 46-22 against the money line (+18.4 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.0, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-1 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.4, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-4 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-16 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-13 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-9 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-15 against the money line (+12.1 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-12 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-9 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-16 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 39-22 against the money line (+14.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-9 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 117-116 against the money line (+24.3 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.1, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-24 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-8 against the money line (+14.4 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.2, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 5 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-21 against the money line (+15.5 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
NEW YORK is 28-18 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 81.9, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 14-3 against the money line (+17.0 Units) in June games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 87.3, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 6*) | NEW YORK is 25-12 against the money line (+16.5 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 82.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 25-13 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 78.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 31-15 against the money line (+13.2 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 80.7, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 12-3 against the money line (+14.3 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 84.9, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 5*) | NEW YORK is 16-9 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 82.8, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 19-6 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 82.1, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 29-11 against the money line (+14.5 Units) in home games after 3 or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 75.0, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 30-14 against the money line (+16.9 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 78.3, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 12-3 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 84.9, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 5*) | NEW YORK is 20-7 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 77.1, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 15-6 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 82.8, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 10-4 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 82.8, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 12-6 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 82.3, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 104-67 against the money line (+21.7 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.1, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 126-118 against the money line (+34.3 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.0, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 113-95 against the money line (+23.6 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.1, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 40-24 against the money line (+14.7 Units) in home games revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.4, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 20-12 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 83.2, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 76-68 against the money line (+27.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 75.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 20-13 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 82.7, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 14-9 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 84.2, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 32-30 against the money line (+18.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 77.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 13-8 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 82.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 8-1 against the money line (+12.9 Units) after allowing 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 91.4, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 6*) | NEW YORK is 8-3 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 87.6, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 10-5 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 85.0, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 22-11 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 81.8, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 6-1 against the money line (+5.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was NEW YORK 85.4, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 78-52 against the money line (+23.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 75.1, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 56-32 against the money line (+25.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 76.5, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 41-21 against the money line (+18.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 78.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 15-10 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 83.3, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 21-13 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 82.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 17-10 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 83.3, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 14-7 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 84.2, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 11-6 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 83.9, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 18-8 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 77.7, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 7-3 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after scoring 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 84.0, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 92-78 against the money line (+20.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 73.9, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 12-6 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 85.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 12-6 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 83.6, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 7-2 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 86.2, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 34-21 against the money line (+12.9 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 78.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 190-149 against the money line (+39.6 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.9, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 84-60 against the money line (+19.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.2, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 5-5 | +1.6 | 8-2 | 5-5 | 85.5 | 40.5 | 44.0% | 46.8 | 79.8 | 38.5 | 42.4% | 41.3 | Road Games | 3-3 | +2.7 | 6-0 | 3-3 | 85.5 | 41.3 | 44.1% | 48.8 | 81.3 | 38.0 | 43.0% | 40.0 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +5.5 | 5-0 | 4-1 | 91.8 | 41.2 | 47.5% | 45.6 | 79.0 | 36.0 | 42.9% | 40.2 | Division Games | 3-3 | -0.9 | 5-1 | 3-3 | 87.7 | 42.8 | 43.4% | 49.7 | 77.7 | 37.7 | 40.2% | 41.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 85.5 | 40.5 | 32-73 | 44.0% | 7-16 | 41.7% | 14-19 | 74.7% | 47 | 10 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 80.2 | 39.9 | 29-67 | 43.0% | 6-17 | 33.0% | 17-21 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 85.5 | 41.3 | 33-75 | 44.1% | 7-16 | 44.8% | 12-17 | 72.0% | 49 | 11 | 20 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.8 | 38.5 | 28-65 | 42.4% | 5-17 | 32.3% | 19-23 | 80.3% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 80.9 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 43.6% | 5-17 | 31.6% | 16-21 | 78.4% | 43 | 10 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 81.3 | 38.0 | 28-66 | 43.0% | 6-16 | 37.8% | 18-23 | 79.9% | 40 | 8 | 18 | 19 | 9 | 12 | 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 7-4 | +3.8 | 6-5 | 7-3 | 81.6 | 41.8 | 43.1% | 46.9 | 81.4 | 39.8 | 40.5% | 41.9 | Home Games | 5-2 | +3.8 | 4-3 | 4-2 | 81.4 | 42.4 | 43.5% | 46.6 | 78.9 | 38.1 | 40.0% | 42.7 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.8 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 87.2 | 42.4 | 44.4% | 47.6 | 81.6 | 40.2 | 39.3% | 42.2 | Division Games | 1-1 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 76.0 | 39.5 | 42.5% | 47.5 | 78.5 | 37.0 | 38.5% | 41.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 81.6 | 41.8 | 29-67 | 43.1% | 5-17 | 31.9% | 18-23 | 78.1% | 47 | 10 | 15 | 23 | 6 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 80.9 | 40.1 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 5-17 | 31.5% | 17-21 | 80.8% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 81.4 | 42.4 | 29-66 | 43.5% | 5-16 | 28.6% | 19-25 | 77.7% | 47 | 10 | 16 | 23 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.4 | 39.8 | 27-68 | 40.5% | 7-18 | 36.0% | 20-25 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 15 | 20 | 6 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 82.3 | 40.9 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 6-18 | 32.7% | 18-23 | 80.2% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 78.9 | 38.1 | 27-68 | 40.0% | 6-17 | 34.2% | 19-24 | 76.9% | 43 | 9 | 15 | 22 | 6 | 12 | 2 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 72, NEW YORK 71.5 |
| | |
|
|
5/20/2017 | @ INDIANA | 79-81 | L | +210 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 39 | 18 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 29 | 9 | 5/23/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 78-80 | L | +550 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 43 | 12 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 42 | 20 | 5/26/2017 | MINNESOTA | 68-82 | L | +200 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 34 | 12 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 51 | 15 | 5/28/2017 | @ CHICAGO | 97-79 | W | +120 | 33-84 | 39.3% | 69 | 7 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 48 | 11 | 5/31/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | 76-78 | L | +250 | 30-77 | 39.0% | 49 | 10 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 48 | 9 | 6/3/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 85-77 | W | -210 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 47 | 10 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 43 | 13 | 6/10/2017 | ATLANTA | 104-71 | W | -165 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 45 | 8 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 39 | 20 | 6/14/2017 | NEW YORK | 96-76 | W | -125 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 41 | 8 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 41 | 11 | 6/17/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 98-93 | W | +350 | 41-74 | 55.4% | 46 | 17 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 30 | 13 | 6/23/2017 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/25/2017 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2017 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2017 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2017 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2017 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/18/2017 | MINNESOTA | 71-90 | L | +175 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 43 | 11 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 50 | 11 | 5/23/2017 | @ PHOENIX | 69-67 | W | -115 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 49 | 17 | 22-64 | 34.4% | 35 | 10 | 5/26/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 81-87 | L | +180 | 31-78 | 39.7% | 50 | 8 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 45 | 10 | 5/30/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 75-90 | L | +120 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 39 | 18 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 38 | 11 | 6/2/2017 | DALLAS | 93-89 | W | -165 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 51 | 16 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 37 | 10 | 6/4/2017 | PHOENIX | 88-72 | W | +175 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 47 | 10 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 45 | 15 | 6/7/2017 | ATLANTA | 76-61 | W | -200 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 54 | 18 | 21-76 | 27.6% | 42 | 9 | 6/11/2017 | SEATTLE | 94-86 | W | -155 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 46 | 7 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 42 | 14 | 6/14/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | 76-96 | L | +105 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 41 | 11 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 41 | 8 | 6/16/2017 | @ DALLAS | 102-93 | W | -115 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 50 | 13 | 31-77 | 40.3% | 41 | 11 | 6/23/2017 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2017 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2017 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/9/2017 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
NEW YORK is 38-39 (-0.9 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
NEW YORK is 7-1 (+6.0 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
NEW YORK is 23-15 (+0.6 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
NEW YORK is 4-0 (+4.0 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/14/2017 | NEW YORK | 76 | 162 | Over | 32 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 41 | 11 | 11 | | CONNECTICUT | 96 | -2 | SU ATS | 45 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 20-25 | 80.0% | 41 | 7 | 8 | 9/9/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 82 | 164.5 | Over | 38 | 30-77 | 39.0% | 5-22 | 22.7% | 17-26 | 65.4% | 45 | 12 | 13 | | NEW YORK | 89 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 26-28 | 92.9% | 47 | 10 | 17 | 7/17/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 76 | 156.5 | ATS | 39 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 23-26 | 88.5% | 40 | 11 | 11 | | NEW YORK | 83 | -8 | SU Over | 36 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 2-4 | 50.0% | 23-26 | 88.5% | 46 | 6 | 16 | 6/16/2016 | NEW YORK | 80 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 19-28 | 67.9% | 45 | 12 | 17 | | CONNECTICUT | 72 | 161.5 | Under | 36 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 30 | 6 | 16 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 16-16 against the money line (+12.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 4-1 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.4, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 7-4 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 16-16 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 15-13 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 14-10 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 11-9 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 15-15 against the money line (+12.1 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 13-12 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 11-9 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 15-16 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 16-11 against the money line (+16.8 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 11-9 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 10-8 against the money line (+14.4 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 7-2 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.2, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 6*) | Miller is 10-5 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.8, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 9-6 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.1, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 17-14 against the money line (+17.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 16-12 against the money line (+18.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 15-10 against the money line (+16.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 17-16 against the money line (+13.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 15-16 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 15-12 against the money line (+17.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 9-17 against the money line (-12.2 Units) in home games when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 74.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 15-18 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 73.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 24-39 against the money line (-15.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 75.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 2-14 against the money line (-14.0 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 72.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
|
Lambeer is 80-73 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in all games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 75.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 27-17 against the money line (+16.1 Units) in June games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 78.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 56-44 against the money line (+20.9 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 76.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 34-28 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 76.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 16-8 against the money line (+13.9 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 81.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Lambeer is 23-12 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.7, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 36-24 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 76.5, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 30-15 against the money line (+16.4 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.1, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 34-20 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 76.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 22-12 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 28-14 against the money line (+15.6 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 44-32 against the money line (+20.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 28-24 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.0, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 47-40 against the money line (+12.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 76.4, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 31-21 against the money line (+19.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 78.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 17-13 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 78.2, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 32-23 against the money line (+19.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 76.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 18-11 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after allowing 90 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 78.1, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 17-10 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.2, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Lambeer is 21-15 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.6, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 24-16 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 79.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 103-63 against the money line (+26.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 75.8, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 70-40 against the money line (+21.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 76.1, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 25-14 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 80.2, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 61-37 against the money line (+17.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 76.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 22-12 against the money line (+8.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 81.0, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 24-10 against the money line (+13.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 78.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 18-10 against the money line (+12.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 80.3, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 39-32 against the money line (+7.7 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.2, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 56-42 against the money line (+22.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 76.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 45-38 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 73.2, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 60-57 against the money line (+7.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 74.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 15-4 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in home games versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 77.7, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 60-53 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 75.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 49-44 against the money line (+21.9 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 73.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 66-39 against the money line (+19.6 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 74.5, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 87 times, while the road underdog won straight up 54 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 11 times, while the road underdog won straight up 6 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 06/21/2017 - Alex Bentley is upgraded to probable Friday vs. NY Liberty ( Personal ) | [F] 06/17/2017 - Lynetta Kizer "?" Friday vs. New York ( Back ) | [F] 06/17/2017 - Morgan Tuck "?" Friday vs. New York ( Knee ) | [F] 05/13/2017 - Chiney Ogwumike out for season ( Achilles ) | |
[G] 06/22/2017 - Epiphanny Prince is upgraded to probable Friday vs. Connecticut Sun ( Personal ) | [C] 06/22/2017 - Kia Vaughn doubtful Friday vs. Connecticut Sun ( Personal ) | [G] 05/19/2017 - Brittany Boyd out for season ( Achilles ) | [G] 05/13/2017 - Shoni Schimmel out for season ( Personal ) | [G] 05/13/2017 - Tanisha Wright out for season ( Personal ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/9/2024 9:46:22 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|