| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON
MINNESOTA |
|
|
166.5
| 76
Final
93 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 607 | WASHINGTON | +325 | | 608 | MINNESOTA | -450 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in non-conference games, off a home loss.
(327-235 since 1997.) (58.2%, +67.6 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more.
(157-44 since 1997.) (78.1%, +64.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more.
(144-29 since 1997.) (83.2%, +63.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more.
(108-28 since 1997.) (79.4%, +50.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(133-64 since 1997.) (67.5%, +47.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(87-22 since 1997.) (79.8%, +43.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(96-63 since 1997.) (60.4%, +42.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(72-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.3%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(124-57 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +53.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more.
(31-1 over the last 5 seasons.) (96.9%, +29.4 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more.
(31-1 over the last 5 seasons.) (96.9%, +29.4 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(46-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.8%, +29.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(39-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (88.6%, +30.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(25-1 over the last 5 seasons.) (96.2%, +23.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(25-1 over the last 5 seasons.) (96.2%, +23.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(46-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.1%, +26.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off an upset loss as a home favorite against opponent off a home loss.
(61-23 since 1997.) (72.6%, +32.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(39-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.8%, +28.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(35-5 since 1997.) (87.5%, +29 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(36-4 since 1997.) (90%, +28 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(36-4 since 1997.) (90%, +28 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(98-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.1%, +42.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(45-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.9%, +24.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(32-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (91.4%, +27.8 units. Rating = 5*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(32-3 since 1997.) (91.4%, +26.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(47-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.9%, +28.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(42-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +26.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(50-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.7%, +34.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(54-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.1%, +27.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(47-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (88.7%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(79-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.7%, +35.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(46-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (88.5%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(63-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +28.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(49-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.7%, +31.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after one or more consecutive overs, very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game.
(41-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.1%, +32.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(29-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (87.9%, +20 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after one or more consecutive overs, very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game.
(41-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.7%, +29.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(55-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.6%, +34.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(48-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +34 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(29-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.9%, +18 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(35-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (92.1%, +30.8 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(76-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +35.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(81-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +25.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(28-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (87.5%, +18.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(65-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.9%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(40-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (87%, +25.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(30-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.1%, +17.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(25-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.3%, +21.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(34-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.3%, +17.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after scoring 90 points or more.
(27-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (90%, +19.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(37-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +18.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after scoring 90 points or more.
(27-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.4%, +17.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in non-conference games, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(54-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +28.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(105-78 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.4%, +29.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(25-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +12.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(34-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (87.2%, +22.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(27-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (87.1%, +21.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(60-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(82-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.9%, +30.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(43-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.5%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(25-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.3%, +21.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games against opponent hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games.
(32-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(46-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +18.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(51-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(28-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +15.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games against opponent after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(43-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in non-conference games, off a home loss.
(327-235 since 1997.) (58.2%, +67.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss.
(34-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.8%, +22 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a loss by 6 points or less.
(72-45 since 1997.) (61.5%, +44.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(101-60 since 1997.) (62.7%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(47-26 since 1997.) (64.4%, +31.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(24-16 since 1997.) (60%, +28.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(31-13 since 1997.) (70.5%, +24.1 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| WASHINGTON | 79 | | 28-68 | 41.7% | 8-22 | 34.5% | 14-18 | 81.7% | 39 | 11 | 12 | | MINNESOTA | 87 | | 33-69 | 47.4% | 5-13 | 40.9% | 16-20 | 80.3% | 46 | 13 | 11 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 709 times, while WASHINGTON won 261 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 17-9 against the money line (+13.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 87.5, OPPONENT 81.0 | MINNESOTA is 106-103 against the money line (-52.0 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.2, OPPONENT 74.2 | MINNESOTA is 66-72 against the money line (-32.8 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.2, OPPONENT 77.0 | MINNESOTA is 41-56 against the money line (-41.0 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.7, OPPONENT 79.6 | MINNESOTA is 15-9 against the money line (-23.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 89.4, OPPONENT 86.3 |
|
WASHINGTON is 106-170 against the money line (-56.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.8, OPPONENT 78.2 | WASHINGTON is 77-118 against the money line (-52.9 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 74.2 | WASHINGTON is 34-98 against the money line (-73.1 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.5, OPPONENT 78.0 | WASHINGTON is 1-6 against the money line (-9.2 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 82.0 | WASHINGTON is 72-111 against the money line (-44.3 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 74.6 | WASHINGTON is 7-14 against the money line (-12.6 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.5, OPPONENT 83.0 | WASHINGTON is 8-23 against the money line (-19.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.2, OPPONENT 87.5 | WASHINGTON is 3-18 against the money line (-22.4 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.4, OPPONENT 91.0 | WASHINGTON is 18-29 against the money line (-15.0 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.3, OPPONENT 80.3 | WASHINGTON is 68-117 against the money line (-41.3 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 74.8 | WASHINGTON is 38-105 against the money line (-75.2 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 75.1 | WASHINGTON is 11-21 against the money line (-12.9 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.7, OPPONENT 85.8 | MINNESOTA is 17-4 against the money line (+10.9 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 74.8 | MINNESOTA is 104-43 against the money line (+47.7 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.9, OPPONENT 72.7 | MINNESOTA is 203-66 against the money line (+105.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.0, OPPONENT 78.7 | MINNESOTA is 151-33 against the money line (+106.6 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 90.4, OPPONENT 80.2 | MINNESOTA is 35-9 against the money line (+16.3 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 71.7 |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 11-8 against the money line (-19.2 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.2, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 9-8 against the money line (-16.3 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.2, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 26-17 against the money line (-24.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.6, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 114-109 against the money line (-50.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.6, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 16-10 against the money line (-24.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 2-4 against the money line (-18.4 Units) in home games versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 7-8 against the money line (-14.5 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.8, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 127-203 against the money line (-60.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 4-10 against the money line (-9.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 10-17 against the money line (-11.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 5-13 against the money line (-11.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 201-306 against the money line (-106.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 39-79 against the money line (-32.3 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 128-178 against the money line (-55.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.6, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 45-113 against the money line (-47.5 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-46 against the money line (-27.0 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 43-85 against the money line (-34.0 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 17-1 against the money line (+14.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 90.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 7-2 against the money line (+8.1 Units) in road games in June games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 84.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 13-9 against the money line (+10.3 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 10-6 against the money line (+10.9 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.2, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-4 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 7-2 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.4, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-6 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 5-1 against the money line (+7.7 Units) after playing 3 consecutive home games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 85.8, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 212-197 against the money line (-74.2 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.0, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 24-14 against the money line (-26.4 Units) against Eastern conference opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 24-14 against the money line (-26.4 Units) in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 8-19 against the money line (-18.6 Units) after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 71.1, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 88-82 against the money line (-39.2 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.9, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 4-16 against the money line (-22.4 Units) after a game being outrebounded by opponent by 15 or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 6*) | MINNESOTA is 152-149 against the money line (-53.4 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.0, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 130-151 against the money line (-65.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.3, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 266-396 against the money line (-121.3 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 1-10 against the money line (-10.1 Units) on Friday over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.8, OPPONENT 89.0 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 6-17 against the money line (-17.5 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.5, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 123-188 against the money line (-65.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-17 against the money line (-17.5 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.5, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 122-193 against the money line (-80.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 52-91 against the money line (-44.4 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 10-18 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 100-142 against the money line (-47.8 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 2-7 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 31-44 against the money line (-21.4 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 13-27 against the money line (-21.9 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 16-71 against the money line (-37.2 Units) in road games revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 32-62 against the money line (-28.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 115-198 against the money line (-73.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 68-128 against the money line (-49.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 13-20 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.2, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 12-19 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.5, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 8-13 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.4, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 5-10 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 81-124 against the money line (-45.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.5, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 128-214 against the money line (-73.3 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 141-237 against the money line (-70.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-13 against the money line (-10.1 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 2-8 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.5, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 65-24 against the money line (+23.5 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 47-16 against the money line (+21.2 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 78-38 against the money line (+28.6 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.1, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 15-1 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 119-60 against the money line (+25.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 40-9 against the money line (+19.3 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 55-16 against the money line (+22.8 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 39-18 against the money line (+17.5 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 14-1 against the money line (+12.5 Units) in home games after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 14-1 against the money line (+12.5 Units) in home games after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 7-4 | -0.6 | 4-6 | 5-6 | 83.6 | 44.2 | 42.0% | 44.8 | 81.1 | 41.7 | 42.2% | 41.1 | | Road Games | 2-2 | 0 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 85.7 | 45.5 | 43.0% | 40.5 | 84.0 | 46.5 | 42.3% | 42.2 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1.6 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 84.6 | 45.4 | 43.4% | 46.0 | 83.2 | 41.2 | 41.8% | 42.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 83.6 | 44.2 | 28-67 | 42.0% | 7-21 | 33.5% | 20-23 | 87.0% | 45 | 11 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 10 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.6 | 41.1 | 30-67 | 44.2% | 5-17 | 31.9% | 18-22 | 80.0% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 85.7 | 45.5 | 30-70 | 43.0% | 8-22 | 35.6% | 18-19 | 94.7% | 40 | 11 | 18 | 19 | 6 | 9 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.1 | 41.7 | 30-70 | 42.2% | 7-18 | 36.8% | 15-19 | 82.0% | 41 | 9 | 19 | 21 | 5 | 10 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.3 | 39.8 | 29-67 | 43.8% | 5-17 | 32.8% | 17-21 | 79.6% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 84.0 | 46.5 | 29-68 | 42.3% | 7-20 | 33.3% | 20-22 | 87.8% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 4 | 11 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 9-1 | +2 | 5-5 | 4-5 | 87.3 | 47.2 | 47.7% | 43.0 | 75.3 | 37.6 | 42.7% | 38.6 | | Home Games | 3-1 | -4 | 0-4 | 1-3 | 80.7 | 41.5 | 45.7% | 40.0 | 75.7 | 38.0 | 44.4% | 45.0 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | -2 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 92.4 | 51.8 | 52.1% | 38.8 | 77.6 | 40.2 | 45.9% | 36.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 87.3 | 47.2 | 33-69 | 47.7% | 6-17 | 37.0% | 15-19 | 78.2% | 43 | 10 | 22 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.5 | 41.1 | 29-68 | 43.4% | 6-17 | 32.5% | 18-23 | 80.7% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.7 | 41.5 | 31-69 | 45.7% | 5-16 | 30.3% | 13-18 | 71.8% | 40 | 9 | 23 | 15 | 12 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.3 | 37.6 | 28-66 | 42.7% | 5-15 | 35.1% | 13-17 | 80.4% | 39 | 8 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.3 | 40.2 | 30-69 | 43.1% | 6-17 | 34.8% | 17-22 | 79.7% | 44 | 10 | 17 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.7 | 38.0 | 31-69 | 44.4% | 6-14 | 43.1% | 8-12 | 66.7% | 45 | 9 | 21 | 17 | 8 | 18 | 5 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 70.2, MINNESOTA 69.6 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/14/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | 89-74 | W | | 28-64 | 43.7% | 46 | 13 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 31 | 13 | | 5/19/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 89-99 | L | +180 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 29 | 14 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 32 | 11 | | 5/21/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 71-81 | L | +105 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 41 | 10 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 39 | 11 | | 5/24/2017 | @ CHICAGO | 82-67 | W | -220 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 48 | 7 | 21-70 | 30.0% | 51 | 10 | | 5/26/2017 | CHICAGO | 88-79 | W | -360 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 51 | 9 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 15 | | 5/31/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 78-76 | W | -330 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 48 | 9 | 30-77 | 39.0% | 49 | 10 | | 6/4/2017 | ATLANTA | 78-72 | W | -250 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 58 | 14 | 28-79 | 35.4% | 45 | 3 | | 6/6/2017 | @ DALLAS | 101-89 | W | -165 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 44 | 7 | 29-77 | 37.7% | 47 | 12 | | 6/9/2017 | MINNESOTA | 73-98 | L | +280 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 38 | 15 | 40-76 | 52.6% | 38 | 8 | | 6/11/2017 | INDIANA | 88-70 | W | -360 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 52 | 10 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 31 | 8 | | 6/18/2017 | DALLAS | 83-87 | L | -360 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 38 | 7 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 49 | 11 | | 6/23/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/25/2017 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2017 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2017 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2017 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/14/2017 | CHICAGO | 70-61 | W | | 27-73 | 37.0% | 48 | 15 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 53 | 23 | | 5/18/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 90-71 | W | -210 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 50 | 11 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 43 | 11 | | 5/20/2017 | @ DALLAS | 89-87 | W | -500 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 45 | 18 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 33 | 16 | | 5/23/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 80-78 | W | -850 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 42 | 20 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 43 | 12 | | 5/26/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | 82-68 | W | -250 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 51 | 15 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 34 | 12 | | 5/28/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | 80-66 | W | | 33-74 | 44.6% | 40 | 8 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 38 | 22 | | 6/3/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 100-77 | W | -155 | 41-69 | 59.4% | 39 | 14 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 27 | 14 | | 6/9/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | 98-73 | W | -360 | 40-76 | 52.6% | 38 | 8 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 38 | 15 | | 6/11/2017 | @ DALLAS | 91-74 | W | -550 | 38-72 | 52.8% | 47 | 13 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 31 | 11 | | 6/17/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 93-98 | L | -500 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 30 | 13 | 41-74 | 55.4% | 46 | 17 | | 6/23/2017 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/25/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2017 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2017 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2017 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| WASHINGTON is 15-18 (+8.1 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 3-3 (+5.1 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| WASHINGTON is 6-8 (+4.3 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 1-1 (+2.5 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/9/2017 | MINNESOTA | 98 | -8 | SU ATS | 58 | 40-76 | 52.6% | 11-24 | 45.8% | 7-9 | 77.8% | 38 | 10 | 8 | | | WASHINGTON | 73 | 157 | Over | 39 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 38 | 8 | 15 | 9/2/2016 | WASHINGTON | 69 | 160 | ATS | 34 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 3-21 | 14.3% | 14-20 | 70.0% | 37 | 10 | 9 | | | MINNESOTA | 75 | -11 | SU Under | 43 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 1-4 | 25.0% | 26-29 | 89.7% | 51 | 11 | 10 | 6/26/2016 | MINNESOTA | 63 | -8.5 | Under | 30 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 36 | 10 | 14 | | | WASHINGTON | 87 | 160 | SU ATS | 52 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 11-29 | 37.9% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 44 | 8 | 9 | 6/11/2016 | MINNESOTA | 83 | -7.5 | SU Over | 45 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 20-25 | 80.0% | 46 | 8 | 19 | | | WASHINGTON | 76 | 158.5 | ATS | 47 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 5-22 | 22.7% | 11-11 | 100.0% | 32 | 6 | 13 |
|
| | |
|
Thibault is 89-63 against the money line (+20.5 Units) in June games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 186-137 against the money line (+24.7 Units) in May, June, or July games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.0, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 48-42 against the money line (+16.9 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.8, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 128-104 against the money line (+22.2 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.7, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 49-36 against the money line (+21.1 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 79.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 53-46 against the money line (+17.0 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.7, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 19-17 against the money line (+10.7 Units) off a home loss as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.5, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 36-34 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 26-22 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 10-5 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 40-35 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.2, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 117-100 against the money line (+21.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 7-3 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 129-116 against the money line (+25.6 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 74.9, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 32-26 against the money line (-22.5 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Thibault is 5-15 against the money line (-12.3 Units) in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 3-9 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in road games after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 2-9 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 20-35 against the money line (-15.4 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 22-30 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.3, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 14-24 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 75.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 10-17 against the money line (-10.6 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 19-27 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 78.8, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 18-33 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.6, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 14-23 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 6-19 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.7, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Thibault is 32-51 against the money line (-19.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 185-82 against the money line (+21.3 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 99-27 against the money line (+21.6 Units) in home games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 99-27 against the money line (+21.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 21-2 against the money line (+15.8 Units) in home games on Friday as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 70-23 against the money line (+22.1 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 79-25 against the money line (+23.8 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 59-17 against the money line (+24.9 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 45-12 against the money line (+23.2 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 60-15 against the money line (+26.7 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 31-6 against the money line (+17.2 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 14-3 against the money line (+9.2 Units) red hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 64-12 against the money line (+39.5 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 86-32 against the money line (+19.0 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 73-31 against the money line (+18.7 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 33-18 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 98-39 against the money line (+20.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 137-58 against the money line (+21.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 69-23 against the money line (+21.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 52-10 against the money line (+24.7 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 108-43 against the money line (+21.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 46-11 against the money line (+19.8 Units) after scoring 90 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 59-15 against the money line (+20.6 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 30-6 against the money line (+18.4 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 102-39 against the money line (+20.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 152-57 against the money line (+25.7 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 110-35 against the money line (+30.8 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 97-29 against the money line (+29.4 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 94-33 against the money line (+29.9 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 97-37 against the money line (+29.6 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 64-31 against the money line (+16.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 135-63 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 115 times, while the road underdog won straight up 27 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 7 times, while the road underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [C] 05/25/2017 - Emma Meesseman out indefinitely ( Personal ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/6/2024 5:00:55 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|