| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO ATLANTA |
|
| 163.5 | 82 Final 78 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
603 | CHICAGO | +175 | 604 | ATLANTA | -210 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - vs. division opponents, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival. (267-97 since 1997.) (73.4%, +82.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - vs. division opponents, off a road loss by 10 points or more. (264-92 since 1997.) (74.2%, +82.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (142-32 since 1997.) (81.6%, +65 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more. (145-52 since 1997.) (73.6%, +56 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home loss against a division rival, terrible team, winning 25% or less of their games on the season. (106-26 since 1997.) (80.3%, +50.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival. (138-53 since 1997.) (72.3%, +50 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games against opponent after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games. (37-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.2%, +21.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games against opponent after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games. (45-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +22.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games against opponent after having lost 4 of their last 5 games. (30-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +18.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a loss against a division rival, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days. (29-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (46.8%, +35.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (42-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.8%, +22.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO | 81 | | 31-71 | 44.1% | 4-12 | 31.1% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 46 | 14 | 14 | ATLANTA | 84 | | 30-70 | 43.2% | 5-16 | 28.3% | 19-25 | 74.4% | 45 | 14 | 11 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, ATLANTA won the game straight up 580 times, while CHICAGO won 391 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CHICAGO is 34-26 against the money line (+16.3 Units) when their opponents make 22% to 28% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 75.0 | CHICAGO is 123-59 against the money line (+75.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 86.6, OPPONENT 81.7 | ATLANTA is 134-144 against the money line (-63.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 81.1 | ATLANTA is 7-12 against the money line (-12.5 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 83.6 | ATLANTA is 2-5 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in home games when they attempt 23 to 27 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 81.1 | ATLANTA is 9-14 against the money line (-16.2 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 79.6 | ATLANTA is 26-40 against the money line (-25.1 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 80.3 | ATLANTA is 66-146 against the money line (-129.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 82.2, OPPONENT 87.6 | ATLANTA is 108-123 against the money line (-47.3 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 84.7, OPPONENT 85.2 |
|
CHICAGO is 105-148 against the money line (-67.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 80.1 | CHICAGO is 49-75 against the money line (-32.5 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 78.6 | CHICAGO is 26-57 against the money line (-40.1 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 78.9 | CHICAGO is 27-49 against the money line (-32.3 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 80.2 | CHICAGO is 36-52 against the money line (-34.4 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 78.4 | CHICAGO is 12-26 against the money line (-20.8 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 90.4 | CHICAGO is 9-22 against the money line (-17.7 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 92.8 | CHICAGO is 65-97 against the money line (-54.2 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 79.5 | CHICAGO is 17-24 against the money line (-12.1 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.6, OPPONENT 88.6 | CHICAGO is 1-12 against the money line (-14.7 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 88.6 | CHICAGO is 7-16 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.6, OPPONENT 87.0 | ATLANTA is 9-2 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in home games when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 84.3, OPPONENT 76.9 | ATLANTA is 17-8 against the money line (+9.6 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 79.3 | ATLANTA is 18-10 against the money line (+15.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 88.1, OPPONENT 87.3 | ATLANTA is 17-4 against the money line (+24.7 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 90.8, OPPONENT 86.7 |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 85-74 against the money line (-47.6 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 121-140 against the money line (-58.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 128-146 against the money line (-60.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 16-28 against the money line (-15.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 10-18 against the money line (-11.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 15-26 against the money line (-17.8 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 114-124 against the money line (-57.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 34-28 against the money line (-29.3 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 106-128 against the money line (-54.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 61-96 against the money line (-60.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 133-174 against the money line (-57.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 33-42 against the money line (-26.7 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 107-156 against the money line (-53.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-14 against the money line (-12.0 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 49-72 against the money line (-35.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-4 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 88.4, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 7-2 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in road games off a loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 166-178 against the money line (-63.7 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 105-67 against the money line (-59.3 Units) as a favorite since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 80-46 against the money line (-45.0 Units) as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 88-66 against the money line (-43.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.9, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 4-11 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in June games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 106-112 against the money line (-54.0 Units) vs. division opponents since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 20-30 against the money line (-18.5 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 18-30 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 12-19 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 74-81 against the money line (-35.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 11-16 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in home games off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 44-60 against the money line (-35.0 Units) off a road loss since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 11-19 against the money line (-24.5 Units) in home games off a road loss by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 52-71 against the money line (-31.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.9, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 4-7 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 82-101 against the money line (-49.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 29-45 against the money line (-33.0 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 113-116 against the money line (-45.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 59-46 against the money line (-37.8 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 82.1, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 15-23 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 35-48 against the money line (-25.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 76-85 against the money line (-39.1 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 12-21 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-9.4 Units) in road games on Friday over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.0, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 110-139 against the money line (-51.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-7 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 83-115 against the money line (-53.4 Units) after one or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-35 against the money line (-19.7 Units) off a home loss against a division rival since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 32-56 against the money line (-29.3 Units) off a home loss since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.5, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 92-141 against the money line (-63.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 70-109 against the money line (-50.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 99-137 against the money line (-52.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 64-91 against the money line (-34.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 68-97 against the money line (-37.6 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-7 against the money line (-8.0 Units) in road games after allowing 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-9.4 Units) in road games after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 60-82 against the money line (-39.0 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 38-55 against the money line (-27.4 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-14 against the money line (-10.7 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-13 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-12 against the money line (-9.4 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.7, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-29 against the money line (-17.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-22 against the money line (-16.1 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-17 against the money line (-15.7 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.7, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 5-13 against the money line (-11.3 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.3, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 28-34 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-15 against the money line (-12.7 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.1, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-7 against the money line (-7.5 Units) in road games after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-16 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.7, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 73-113 against the money line (-49.8 Units) after playing a home game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-10 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in road games after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.5, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 2-10 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.5, OPPONENT 91.5 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 13-21 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after a game forcing opponent to commit 8 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-9.5 Units) in road games after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 9 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) in home games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 88.4, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 9-0 against the money line (+13.3 Units) in home games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 93.2, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 7-1 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 87.1, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 9-3 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 84.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 10-4 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 85.2, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 2-9 | -5.2 | 5-6 | 6-4 | 77.0 | 37.8 | 43.0% | 45.3 | 85.0 | 43.0 | 41.9% | 46.5 | Road Games | 2-4 | +0.2 | 5-1 | 2-3 | 74.7 | 34.2 | 43.3% | 47.5 | 79.2 | 41.5 | 38.8% | 46.2 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2.8 | 3-2 | 3-1 | 80.6 | 38.8 | 49.2% | 42.6 | 87.2 | 43.0 | 42.8% | 39.8 | Division Games | 1-5 | -3.4 | 1-5 | 4-2 | 77.0 | 38.3 | 40.9% | 45.3 | 86.7 | 42.2 | 42.7% | 49.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.0 | 37.8 | 29-68 | 43.0% | 5-16 | 34.3% | 13-18 | 73.5% | 45 | 8 | 18 | 22 | 5 | 16 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 80.2 | 39.6 | 29-66 | 43.3% | 6-17 | 32.3% | 17-22 | 80.3% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 74.7 | 34.2 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 4-12 | 35.1% | 12-17 | 70.6% | 47 | 9 | 17 | 22 | 6 | 18 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 85.0 | 43.0 | 30-73 | 41.9% | 5-18 | 28.9% | 19-25 | 76.1% | 46 | 11 | 20 | 17 | 9 | 10 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 81.3 | 40.7 | 29-67 | 43.1% | 6-18 | 31.8% | 18-22 | 79.7% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.2 | 41.5 | 28-71 | 38.8% | 5-18 | 25.5% | 19-26 | 73.7% | 46 | 10 | 19 | 16 | 10 | 10 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 5-5 | +2.7 | 4-5 | 3-7 | 76.4 | 35.7 | 39.9% | 43.8 | 80.4 | 38.7 | 42.3% | 47.5 | Home Games | 2-1 | +0.7 | 1-2 | 0-3 | 74.3 | 32.3 | 39.0% | 46.7 | 72.7 | 33.0 | 41.4% | 47.7 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -0.8 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 73.8 | 33.2 | 37.6% | 41.8 | 85.8 | 40.6 | 45.0% | 47.6 | Division Games | 2-5 | -3.8 | 2-4 | 2-5 | 74.4 | 35.7 | 38.7% | 43.1 | 82.1 | 39.7 | 42.5% | 49.3 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.4 | 35.7 | 28-69 | 39.9% | 4-18 | 23.0% | 17-23 | 72.8% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.9 | 40.6 | 29-68 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 33.0% | 18-22 | 79.5% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 74.3 | 32.3 | 27-68 | 39.0% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 17-26 | 65.4% | 47 | 12 | 19 | 18 | 10 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.4 | 38.7 | 28-66 | 42.3% | 5-17 | 28.9% | 20-25 | 79.4% | 47 | 9 | 15 | 21 | 6 | 15 | 6 | vs opponents averaging | 81.2 | 40 | 30-67 | 43.9% | 6-16 | 35.0% | 16-20 | 79.8% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 72.7 | 33.0 | 26-64 | 41.4% | 4-13 | 28.9% | 16-23 | 72.1% | 48 | 10 | 18 | 21 | 7 | 18 | 10 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 72.5, ATLANTA 71.2 |
| | |
|
|
5/14/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 61-70 | L | | 24-68 | 35.3% | 53 | 23 | 27-73 | 37.0% | 48 | 15 | 5/19/2017 | ATLANTA | 83-91 | L | +100 | 30-77 | 39.0% | 39 | 12 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 47 | 15 | 5/21/2017 | @ ATLANTA | 75-71 | W | +200 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 54 | 15 | 25-72 | 34.7% | 49 | 11 | 5/24/2017 | WASHINGTON | 67-82 | L | +180 | 21-70 | 30.0% | 51 | 10 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 48 | 7 | 5/26/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | 79-88 | L | +280 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 15 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 51 | 9 | 5/28/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 79-97 | L | -140 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 48 | 11 | 33-84 | 39.3% | 69 | 7 | 6/1/2017 | PHOENIX | 91-99 | L | +175 | 38-71 | 53.5% | 35 | 16 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 37 | 11 | 6/6/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 70-79 | L | +650 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 48 | 18 | 22-64 | 34.4% | 44 | 7 | 6/10/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 85-81 | W | +120 | 36-65 | 55.4% | 41 | 20 | 33-82 | 40.2% | 44 | 12 | 6/16/2017 | @ PHOENIX | 78-86 | L | +350 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 49 | 15 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 41 | 9 | 6/18/2017 | INDIANA | 79-91 | L | -105 | 31-57 | 54.4% | 40 | 18 | 37-80 | 46.2% | 33 | 4 | 6/23/2017 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/25/2017 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2017 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2017 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/19/2017 | @ CHICAGO | 91-83 | W | -120 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 47 | 15 | 30-77 | 39.0% | 39 | 12 | 5/21/2017 | CHICAGO | 71-75 | L | -250 | 25-72 | 34.7% | 49 | 11 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 54 | 15 | 5/27/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 75-73 | W | +220 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 45 | 13 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 40 | 17 | 5/31/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | 77-70 | W | -330 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 46 | 13 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 49 | 21 | 6/4/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | 72-78 | L | +200 | 28-79 | 35.4% | 45 | 3 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 58 | 14 | 6/7/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 61-76 | L | +170 | 21-76 | 27.6% | 42 | 9 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 54 | 18 | 6/10/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | 71-104 | L | +145 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 39 | 20 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 45 | 8 | 6/13/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 91-86 | W | +325 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 45 | 17 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 41 | 15 | 6/15/2017 | @ INDIANA | 74-85 | L | +155 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 38 | 8 | 31-57 | 54.4% | 40 | 13 | 6/23/2017 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2017 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2017 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2017 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2017 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/9/2017 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CHICAGO is 26-17 (+14.2 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 6-4 (+0.3 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CHICAGO is 13-10 (+10.4 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
ATLANTA is 3-2 (+1.4 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
5/21/2017 | CHICAGO | 75 | 164.5 | SU ATS | 28 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 14-20 | 70.0% | 54 | 10 | 15 | | ATLANTA | 71 | -6 | Under | 32 | 25-72 | 34.7% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 16-25 | 64.0% | 49 | 11 | 11 | 5/19/2017 | ATLANTA | 91 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 11-20 | 55.0% | 47 | 8 | 15 | | CHICAGO | 83 | 155 | Over | 43 | 30-77 | 39.0% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 17-17 | 100.0% | 39 | 9 | 12 | 9/25/2016 | ATLANTA | 98 | 172 | Over | 50 | 33-77 | 42.9% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 24-34 | 70.6% | 47 | 16 | 12 | | CHICAGO | 108 | -2 | SU ATS | 56 | 44-80 | 55.0% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 47 | 17 | 11 | 8/26/2016 | ATLANTA | 82 | 167 | Over | 44 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 22-31 | 71.0% | 41 | 6 | 12 | | CHICAGO | 90 | -5 | SU ATS | 44 | 32-79 | 40.5% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 22-25 | 88.0% | 50 | 18 | 7 | 6/17/2016 | CHICAGO | 97 | -5 | Over | 55 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 18-25 | 72.0% | 51 | 11 | 11 | | ATLANTA | 101 | 177 | SU ATS | 55 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 30-38 | 78.9% | 50 | 9 | 9 | 5/22/2016 | CHICAGO | 81 | -4.5 | Under | 41 | 29-77 | 37.7% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 60 | 14 | 13 | | ATLANTA | 87 | 170.5 | SU ATS | 37 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 22-31 | 71.0% | 44 | 7 | 5 |
|
| | |
|
Cooper is 58-58 against the money line (-22.8 Units) in all games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 36-25 against the money line (-32.1 Units) as a favorite as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 25-15 against the money line (-24.1 Units) as a home favorite as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 16-19 against the money line (-16.4 Units) in June games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 33-38 against the money line (-31.9 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 5-12 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 17-25 against the money line (-20.6 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 15-20 against the money line (-16.9 Units) off a road loss as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 3-6 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in home games off a road loss by 10 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 37-45 against the money line (-19.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 30-41 against the money line (-24.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 25-38 against the money line (-24.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 20-36 against the money line (-27.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Cooper is 19-22 against the money line (-19.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 12-18 against the money line (-19.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 10-13 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 23-32 against the money line (-24.2 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 16-20 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 38-38 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 35-35 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 18-25 against the money line (-19.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 22-34 against the money line (-35.0 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Cooper is 7-18 against the money line (-20.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Cooper is 4-7 against the money line (-14.4 Units) when playing against a terrible team (Win Pct. <=25%) as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 32-31 against the money line (-33.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Cooper is 40-48 against the money line (-24.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 30-35 against the money line (-15.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 41-47 against the money line (-19.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 28-39 against the money line (-25.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 19-25 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 39-46 against the money line (-23.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 25-31 against the money line (-20.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.3, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 9-12 against the money line (-19.1 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 77.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Cooper is 36-44 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Cooper is 12-5 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in home games when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 82.0, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 171-91 against the money line (+40.5 Units) after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Cooper 76.3, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 120-64 against the money line (+38.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Cooper 77.4, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 18-4 against the money line (+14.2 Units) in home games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 85.3, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Cooper is 7-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) in home games after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 88.9, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 13-2 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in home games revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Cooper 83.9, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 7-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in home games revenging a home loss versus opponent as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 84.1, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 100-64 against the money line (+20.9 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Cooper 77.6, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 61-37 against the money line (+19.9 Units) off a loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Cooper 78.5, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 14-6 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Cooper 76.5, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 30-21 against the money line (+8.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 11-4 against the money line (+10.4 Units) in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 86.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 214 times, while the road underdog won straight up 80 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 11 times, while the road underdog won straight up 5 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 05/28/2017 - Jamierra Faulkner out for season ( ACL ) | [C] 05/21/2017 - Alaina Coates out indefinitely ( Ankle ) | |
[F] 06/13/2017 - Sancho Lyttle expected to miss next 4 games ( Personal ) | [F] 05/27/2017 - Aneika Henry-Morello out indefinitely ( Foot ) | [F] 05/13/2017 - Angel McCoughtry out indefinitely ( Personal ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/10/2024 2:15:36 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|