| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT NEW YORK |
|
| 145.5 | 88 Final 66 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
651 | CONNECTICUT | +170 | 652 | NEW YORK | -200 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game. (224-61 since 1997.) (78.6%, +79.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game. (158-26 since 1997.) (85.9%, +76.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game. (260-119 since 1997.) (68.6%, +71 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (159-51 since 1997.) (75.7%, +65.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (143-43 since 1997.) (76.9%, +62.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (167-73 since 1997.) (69.6%, +61.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games. (231-78 since 1997.) (74.8%, +57 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game. (97-15 since 1997.) (86.6%, +56.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (133-55 since 1997.) (70.7%, +55.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (113-31 since 1997.) (78.5%, +54.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (125-39 since 1997.) (76.2%, +53.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive unders, poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game. (146-54 since 1997.) (73%, +51.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents. (159-47 since 1997.) (77.2%, +46.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (93-19 since 1997.) (83%, +40.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (89-16 since 1997.) (84.8%, +38.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (122-36 since 1997.) (77.2%, +38.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, on Saturday games. (94-65 since 1997.) (59.1%, +38.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (122-68 since 1997.) (64.2%, +35.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (87-42 since 1997.) (67.4%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (73-15 since 1997.) (83%, +33.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (69-12 since 1997.) (85.2%, +31.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, on Saturday games. (70-45 since 1997.) (60.9%, +30.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (28-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.9%, -1.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (90-26 since 1997.) (77.6%, +29.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (80-20 since 1997.) (80%, +28.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (154-90 since 1997.) (63.1%, +28.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (70-16 since 1997.) (81.4%, +28.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (86-38 since 1997.) (69.4%, +27.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (118-69 since 1997.) (63.1%, +25.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (56-11 since 1997.) (83.6%, +24.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%). (61-30 since 1997.) (67%, +24.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (53-9 since 1997.) (85.5%, +22.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%) after 15 or more games. (42-19 since 1997.) (68.9%, +19 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%) after 15 or more games. (26-8 since 1997.) (76.5%, +16.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - vs. division opponents, off a road win by 10 points or more. (46-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.7%, +28.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - off an upset win as an underdog, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%). (22-10 since 1997.) (68.8%, +10.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - off an upset win by 10 points or more as a road underdog. (40-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.6%, +27.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win, with a losing record. (65-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.3%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - off an upset win by 10 points or more as a road underdog, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (24-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.8%, +17.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - vs. division opponents, off an upset win by 10 points or more as a road underdog. (26-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.2%, +17.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - vs. division opponents, off an upset win by 10 points or more as a road underdog. (32-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +19.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (156-94 since 1997.) (62.4%, +51 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (49-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.1%, +38 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game, with a losing record. (73-53 since 1997.) (57.9%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (34-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.8%, +26.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (27-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.5%, +22.5 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT | 69 | | 27-73 | 37.6% | 4-14 | 29.5% | 10-13 | 73.8% | 43 | 12 | 11 | NEW YORK | 73 | | 29-68 | 42.0% | 4-11 | 36.8% | 12-15 | 76.4% | 51 | 13 | 16 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, NEW YORK won the game straight up 602 times, while CONNECTICUT won 369 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 14-4 against the money line (+11.9 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 74.3 | CONNECTICUT is 30-14 against the money line (+15.7 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 75.8 | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the money line (+10.2 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 73.8 | NEW YORK is 14-25 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 73.1, OPPONENT 78.8 | NEW YORK is 1-7 against the money line (-7.2 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents this season. The average score was NEW YORK 69.1, OPPONENT 78.1 | NEW YORK is 3-8 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in home games in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 67.8, OPPONENT 74.6 | NEW YORK is 4-12 against the money line (-12.7 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 70.4, OPPONENT 75.8 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 3-10 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 69.8, OPPONENT 75.8 | CONNECTICUT is 27-39 against the money line (-22.9 Units) when they make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.9, OPPONENT 73.7 | CONNECTICUT is 4-8 against the money line (-12.0 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.1, OPPONENT 78.1 | CONNECTICUT is 3-9 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in road games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.8, OPPONENT 81.3 | CONNECTICUT is 1-5 against the money line (-7.1 Units) when they score 66 to 71 points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 68.3, OPPONENT 78.3 | CONNECTICUT is 3-7 against the money line (-8.9 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.0, OPPONENT 75.7 | NEW YORK is 9-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 77.7, OPPONENT 70.7 | NEW YORK is 12-4 against the money line (+8.0 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 76.4, OPPONENT 70.1 | NEW YORK is 10-3 against the money line (+7.5 Units) in home games when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 71.9, OPPONENT 70.7 | NEW YORK is 8-1 against the money line (+8.9 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 73.6, OPPONENT 68.3 | NEW YORK is 43-32 against the money line (+14.9 Units) when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 73.1, OPPONENT 70.6 | NEW YORK is 14-9 against the money line (+10.2 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 74.9, OPPONENT 73.8 |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK is 3-14 against the money line (-11.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 67.0, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 6-17 against the money line (-12.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 70.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 13-19 against the money line (-18.0 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 68.4, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-30 against the money line (-24.2 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.2, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 132-104 against the money line (+28.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 74.1, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 92-58 against the money line (+24.0 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.4, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 64-38 against the money line (+17.6 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+9.7 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-8 against the money line (+9.2 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 4-13 against the money line (-10.7 Units) on Saturday games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 73.1, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 7-14 against the money line (-9.8 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 71.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 2-7 against the money line (-9.1 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 63.2, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 1-9 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 67.7, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 3-8 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 69.9, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 27-39 against the money line (-20.4 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 68.2, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 17-28 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 67.8, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 5-12 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in all games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.6, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-15 against the money line (-16.9 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-9 against the money line (-7.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 69.9, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-4 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 64.3, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-9 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 67.0, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-8 against the money line (-7.7 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 69.4, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-8 against the money line (-8.3 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 69.8, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 13-4 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in home games in August or September games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 74.8, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 200-159 against the money line (+27.6 Units) after a division game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 69.5, OPPONENT 68.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 20-14 against the money line (+13.5 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 75.7, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 12-6 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 70.6, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 12-2 against the money line (+12.0 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog of 6 or more since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 74.3, OPPONENT 68.4 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 100-83 against the money line (+29.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.4, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 63-48 against the money line (+23.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.7, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 149-132 against the money line (+28.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.3, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 82-64 against the money line (+31.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.0, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 46-39 against the money line (+18.9 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.5, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 28-25 against the money line (+17.5 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.1, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 20-16 against the money line (+17.5 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 70.7, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 124-102 against the money line (+29.1 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.6, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 156-120 against the money line (+41.7 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.2, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 31-20 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after playing 3 consecutive road games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.2, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 5-12 | -11.6 | 6-11 | 4-12 | 70.6 | 33.2 | 38.8% | 45.2 | 74.8 | 37.8 | 41.5% | 46.8 | Road Games | 1-7 | -5.9 | 2-6 | 1-7 | 66.4 | 31.9 | 36.9% | 44.9 | 73.9 | 37.2 | 41.0% | 50.2 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.2 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 66.2 | 28.4 | 36.3% | 42.8 | 69.2 | 33.6 | 40.1% | 52.2 | Division Games | 3-7 | -5.4 | 5-5 | 2-7 | 70.7 | 32.0 | 40.1% | 45.8 | 73.7 | 38.4 | 40.9% | 45.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.6 | 33.2 | 27-70 | 38.8% | 4-13 | 31.3% | 12-16 | 73.5% | 45 | 11 | 15 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.6 | 37.2 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 5-14 | 32.2% | 15-19 | 78.5% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 66.4 | 31.9 | 26-71 | 36.9% | 4-15 | 28.9% | 10-14 | 71.6% | 45 | 12 | 13 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.8 | 37.8 | 29-69 | 41.5% | 4-12 | 32.9% | 13-18 | 75.7% | 47 | 12 | 13 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 75.2 | 37.7 | 28-67 | 41.4% | 5-15 | 32.3% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 73.9 | 37.2 | 29-70 | 41.0% | 4-12 | 31.6% | 13-18 | 70.8% | 50 | 15 | 14 | 15 | 8 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 8-11 | -0.6 | 10-9 | 7-11 | 71.1 | 33.6 | 41.2% | 47.0 | 76.2 | 37.5 | 39.4% | 43.2 | Home Games | 5-4 | +0.8 | 4-5 | 2-7 | 69.1 | 31.2 | 40.7% | 48.9 | 72.9 | 33.8 | 37.3% | 43.4 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +1.1 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 68.4 | 31.4 | 38.0% | 48.2 | 74.0 | 37.2 | 37.7% | 44.4 | Division Games | 5-7 | +1.6 | 6-6 | 4-7 | 69.5 | 33.6 | 39.9% | 47.4 | 76.5 | 38.7 | 39.4% | 43.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.1 | 33.6 | 28-67 | 41.2% | 4-11 | 34.8% | 12-16 | 75.9% | 47 | 11 | 15 | 18 | 6 | 17 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 75 | 37.2 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 4-13 | 32.6% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 69.1 | 31.2 | 27-67 | 40.7% | 3-11 | 28.3% | 12-16 | 73.1% | 49 | 12 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 19 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.2 | 37.5 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 6-20 | 30.4% | 14-18 | 78.1% | 43 | 11 | 16 | 16 | 10 | 11 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 75.4 | 38 | 28-67 | 41.4% | 5-15 | 32.0% | 15-19 | 78.6% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 72.9 | 33.8 | 27-71 | 37.3% | 7-20 | 33.1% | 13-17 | 77.6% | 43 | 11 | 14 | 17 | 11 | 13 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 70.8, NEW YORK 72 |
| | |
|
|
6/29/2013 | PHOENIX | 70-89 | L | +170 | 18-67 | 26.9% | 51 | 11 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 48 | 12 | 7/2/2013 | TULSA | 88-69 | W | -220 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 49 | 13 | 26-77 | 33.8% | 44 | 9 | 7/6/2013 | @ INDIANA | 66-78 | L | +170 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 42 | 21 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 34 | 8 | 7/12/2013 | CHICAGO | 70-83 | L | +145 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 45 | 12 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 40 | 12 | 7/14/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 86-84 | W | -330 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 38 | 7 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 46 | 14 | 7/19/2013 | @ TULSA | 58-64 | L | -120 | 21-72 | 29.2% | 46 | 15 | 25-75 | 33.3% | 66 | 24 | 7/20/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 52-60 | L | -105 | 21-72 | 29.2% | 46 | 11 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 48 | 16 | 7/24/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 65-74 | L | +350 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 48 | 14 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 53 | 13 | 8/1/2013 | INDIANA | 70-64 | W | -200 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 36 | 8 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 48 | 13 | 8/3/2013 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2013 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2013 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2013 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2013 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/26/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 74-87 | L | +300 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 47 | 17 | 33-79 | 41.8% | 44 | 4 | 6/28/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 67-62 | W | +155 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 52 | 21 | 23-68 | 33.8% | 36 | 7 | 7/2/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 87-94 | L | +550 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 43 | 13 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 44 | 7 | 7/4/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 89-97 | L | +650 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 34 | 14 | 40-62 | 64.5% | 29 | 15 | 7/7/2013 | CHICAGO | 64-93 | L | +135 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 48 | 15 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 44 | 10 | 7/9/2013 | SEATTLE | 66-57 | W | -300 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 45 | 17 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 38 | 18 | 7/13/2013 | INDIANA | 53-74 | L | -125 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 44 | 22 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 38 | 7 | 7/18/2013 | CHICAGO | 55-75 | L | +155 | 22-69 | 31.9% | 49 | 18 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 46 | 10 | 7/20/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 69-80 | L | +550 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 48 | 14 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 38 | 12 | 7/23/2013 | @ INDIANA | 77-72 | W | +210 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 43 | 12 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 46 | 7 | 7/25/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 53-65 | L | +120 | 16-60 | 26.7% | 48 | 16 | 19-61 | 31.1% | 52 | 13 | 7/31/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 88-78 | W | +200 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 53 | 16 | 28-77 | 36.4% | 40 | 11 | 8/3/2013 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2013 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/10/2013 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2013 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2013 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
NEW YORK is 27-35 (-6.0 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 10-3 (+7.1 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
NEW YORK is 17-13 (-0.9 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 3-3 (+0.0 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/14/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 68 | 147.5 | Under | 33 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 8-11 | 72.7% | 43 | 7 | 11 | | NEW YORK | 78 | 0 | SU ATS | 24 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 6-12 | 50.0% | 16-25 | 64.0% | 63 | 20 | 16 | 5/25/2013 | NEW YORK | 69 | 150 | | 42 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 10-10 | 100.0% | 45 | 8 | 16 | | CONNECTICUT | 81 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 31-78 | 39.7% | 10-26 | 38.5% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 48 | 14 | 10 | 9/29/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 75 | -4 | SU ATS | 27 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 51 | 15 | 13 | | NEW YORK | 62 | 151.5 | Under | 33 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 5-7 | 71.4% | 31 | 6 | 10 | 9/27/2012 | NEW YORK | 60 | 154 | ATS | 34 | 20-77 | 26.0% | 5-23 | 21.7% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 52 | 17 | 12 | | CONNECTICUT | 65 | -9.5 | SU Under | 41 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 7-9 | 77.8% | 47 | 7 | 13 | 8/18/2012 | NEW YORK | 74 | 154.5 | Over | 43 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 9-18 | 50.0% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 36 | 5 | 26 | | CONNECTICUT | 85 | -7 | SU ATS | 47 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 37 | 6 | 13 | 8/16/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 66 | -3 | Under | 35 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 4-5 | 80.0% | 47 | 12 | 17 | | NEW YORK | 79 | 153.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 5-6 | 83.3% | 36 | 9 | 6 | 6/15/2012 | NEW YORK | 55 | 162 | Under | 27 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 1-10 | 10.0% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 35 | 6 | 19 | | CONNECTICUT | 97 | -8 | SU ATS | 61 | 36-71 | 50.7% | 4-9 | 44.4% | 21-24 | 87.5% | 45 | 11 | 10 | 5/20/2012 | NEW YORK | 77 | 154 | Over | 40 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 15-22 | 68.2% | 41 | 10 | 13 | | CONNECTICUT | 92 | -7 | SU ATS | 44 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 26-29 | 89.7% | 46 | 10 | 11 | 5/19/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 78 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 33 | 31-78 | 39.7% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 50 | 14 | 11 | | NEW YORK | 73 | 154 | Under | 41 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 2-15 | 13.3% | 15-24 | 62.5% | 54 | 13 | 10 |
|
| | |
|
Anne is 73-50 against the money line (+21.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 74.0, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Anne is 5-12 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.6, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 1-9 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 67.0, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 6*) | Anne is 3-8 against the money line (-8.3 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 69.8, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 85-100 against the money line (-50.3 Units) after playing a game as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 72.4, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 68-77 against the money line (-37.7 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 72.5, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 67-34 against the money line (+33.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 74.7, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 85-50 against the money line (+22.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 71.4, OPPONENT 68.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 31-17 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 78.3, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 45-24 against the money line (+21.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 71.3, OPPONENT 68.8 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 147 times, while the road underdog won straight up 95 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 22 times, while the road underdog won straight up 9 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 08/01/2013 - Kara Lawson expected to miss another 2 weeks ( Knee ) | [G] 06/16/2013 - Danielle McCray out for season ( Achilles ) | [F] 05/25/2013 - Asjha Jones out for season ( Personal ) | |
[G] 06/09/2013 - Essence Carson out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/4/2024 10:58:19 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|