| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO INDIANA |
|
| 144 | 58 Final 79 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
653 | CHICAGO | +120 | 654 | INDIANA | -140 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent. (679-293 since 1997.) (69.9%, +145.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent. (636-279 since 1997.) (69.5%, +133.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, after 3 consecutive division games. (505-198 since 1997.) (71.8%, +106.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (131-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.2%, +55.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival. (321-132 since 1997.) (70.9%, +89.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, in August or September games. (302-115 since 1997.) (72.4%, +89.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss. (243-93 since 1997.) (72.3%, +89.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival. (247-93 since 1997.) (72.6%, +89.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival. (330-137 since 1997.) (70.7%, +88.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a loss against a division rival, in August or September games. (223-77 since 1997.) (74.3%, +85.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival. (251-97 since 1997.) (72.1%, +84.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss. (247-98 since 1997.) (71.6%, +84.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a loss against a division rival, in August or September games. (262-97 since 1997.) (73%, +81.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, playing on back-to-back days. (277-99 since 1997.) (73.7%, +79.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (114-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +42.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival. (186-64 since 1997.) (74.4%, +78.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (259-95 since 1997.) (73.2%, +78.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (277-104 since 1997.) (72.7%, +78.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (320-194 since 1997.) (62.3%, +75 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival. (185-67 since 1997.) (73.4%, +71.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss. (310-211 since 1997.) (59.5%, +70.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival. (232-94 since 1997.) (71.2%, +70.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a road loss, in August or September games. (207-76 since 1997.) (73.1%, +69.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival. (235-96 since 1997.) (71%, +67.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (176-61 since 1997.) (74.3%, +59.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (186-82 since 1997.) (69.4%, +58.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (161-54 since 1997.) (74.9%, +55.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (134-53 since 1997.) (71.7%, +53.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss. (126-111 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +42.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (126-40 since 1997.) (75.9%, +50.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (143-55 since 1997.) (72.2%, +50.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (115-34 since 1997.) (77.2%, +49.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a game being called for 10+ less fouls than opponent. (25-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.5%, +16.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (76-44 since 1997.) (63.3%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points. (60-33 since 1997.) (64.5%, +33.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good defensive team (38-40.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better. (57-19 since 1997.) (75%, +31.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, on Saturday games. (40-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season. (42-18 since 1997.) (70%, +28.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, off an home win scoring 85 or more points. (44-21 since 1997.) (67.7%, +28.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in August or September games. (40-15 since 1997.) (72.7%, +24.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (32-14 since 1997.) (69.6%, +22.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (44-10 since 1997.) (81.5%, +20.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (30-13 since 1997.) (69.8%, +19.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good defensive team (38-40.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (23-8 since 1997.) (74.2%, +16.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good defensive team (38-40.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game). (23-8 since 1997.) (74.2%, +16.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good defensive team (38-40.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (23-8 since 1997.) (74.2%, +16.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team. (66-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.7%, +36.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a win against a division rival, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record. (51-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.7%, +23.3 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO | 76 | | 28-66 | 42.0% | 5-15 | 33.1% | 15-19 | 82.0% | 47 | 11 | 14 | INDIANA | 74 | | 27-68 | 39.3% | 6-17 | 37.1% | 15-18 | 81.7% | 42 | 10 | 11 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 517 times, while INDIANA won 462 times. Edge against the money line=CHICAGO |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
INDIANA is 81-99 against the money line (-63.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 76.5, OPPONENT 76.2 | INDIANA is 3-10 against the money line (-13.9 Units) when they make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 69.4, OPPONENT 73.7 | INDIANA is 32-59 against the money line (-44.6 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.3, OPPONENT 74.2 | INDIANA is 44-63 against the money line (-32.1 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 70.8, OPPONENT 72.6 | INDIANA is 72-75 against the money line (-43.2 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 82.0, OPPONENT 82.1 |
|
CHICAGO is 24-30 against the money line (-17.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 76.9 | CHICAGO is 10-17 against the money line (-14.1 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 74.0, OPPONENT 75.7 | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in road games when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 72.5, OPPONENT 78.0 | CHICAGO is 8-13 against the money line (-11.8 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 79.6 | CHICAGO is 25-52 against the money line (-34.5 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 72.8, OPPONENT 77.0 | CHICAGO is 4-8 against the money line (-9.6 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 73.5, OPPONENT 76.6 | CHICAGO is 10-15 against the money line (-11.6 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 81.7 | INDIANA is 14-6 against the money line (+8.8 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.9, OPPONENT 71.3 | INDIANA is 21-11 against the money line (+10.6 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.5, OPPONENT 72.4 | INDIANA is 107-73 against the money line (+26.6 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.6, OPPONENT 68.2 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 45-51 against the money line (-26.6 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 22-30 against the money line (-19.2 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 1-11 against the money line (-10.9 Units) in road games when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 70.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 52-88 against the money line (-39.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 30-58 against the money line (-27.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.5, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-13 against the money line (-12.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 27-38 against the money line (-24.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-14 against the money line (-16.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 28-37 against the money line (-21.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 14-7 against the money line (+9.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.9, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 22-9 against the money line (+13.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.3, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 20-11 against the money line (+10.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.8, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 50-32 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 10-5 against the money line (+8.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.3, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 25-15 against the money line (+13.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.5, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 22-11 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.4, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 50-29 against the money line (+18.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.3, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 10-4 against the money line (+7.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.1, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 74-58 against the money line (+16.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.0, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 20-11 against the money line (+10.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.8, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 15-9 against the money line (+9.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.1, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 24-16 against the money line (+8.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.3, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 14-6 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 4-8 against the money line (-7.8 Units) vs. division opponents this season. The average score was INDIANA 68.1, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 6-14 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in road games after a division game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 73.6, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-7.2 Units) in road games after 3 consecutive division games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 71.8, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 27-33 against the money line (-20.8 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-16 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 72.9, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 47-72 against the money line (-35.0 Units) after one or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 22-33 against the money line (-21.2 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.5, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-24 against the money line (-19.3 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 71.4, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-14 against the money line (-15.9 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 11-16 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 27-49 against the money line (-30.8 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 41-62 against the money line (-28.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.6, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-11 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 71.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-8 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 71.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-18 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.6, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-17 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 70.9, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 16-28 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 32-60 against the money line (-42.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 15-26 against the money line (-22.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.5, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 23-49 against the money line (-36.3 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 9-14 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 11-3 against the money line (+7.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.9, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 15-4 against the money line (+9.6 Units) on Saturday games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.3, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 24-15 against the money line (+9.5 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.8, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 13-6 against the money line (+10.3 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 78-57 against the money line (+21.4 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.4, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 82-59 against the money line (+20.9 Units) off a road loss since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.1, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 16-6 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.2, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 9-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.9, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 14-5 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.6, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 38-20 against the money line (+23.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 69.8, OPPONENT 67.2 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 15-2 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 82.4, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 120-104 against the money line (+19.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.2, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 13-5 | +2.6 | 10-8 | 10-8 | 81.3 | 43.0 | 42.3% | 47.3 | 74.3 | 37.9 | 39.9% | 42.4 | Road Games | 5-4 | -0.8 | 5-4 | 4-5 | 79.9 | 43.3 | 42.2% | 46.1 | 73.8 | 36.8 | 39.4% | 42.9 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2.2 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 80.2 | 43.6 | 42.2% | 42.0 | 70.8 | 36.2 | 39.7% | 45.8 | Division Games | 9-2 | +6.2 | 7-4 | 7-4 | 81.9 | 43.6 | 42.7% | 45.2 | 72.8 | 38.1 | 39.9% | 43.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 81.3 | 43.0 | 29-69 | 42.3% | 5-15 | 32.7% | 18-22 | 82.6% | 47 | 11 | 15 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 7 | vs opponents surrendering | 77 | 38 | 29-68 | 42.2% | 5-15 | 31.6% | 15-19 | 78.5% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 79.9 | 43.3 | 28-67 | 42.2% | 6-16 | 35.7% | 18-21 | 83.4% | 46 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.3 | 37.9 | 28-70 | 39.9% | 5-14 | 35.2% | 14-18 | 76.1% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 74.4 | 36.1 | 28-67 | 41.4% | 5-14 | 32.4% | 14-18 | 77.3% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 73.8 | 36.8 | 27-69 | 39.4% | 5-13 | 34.5% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 43 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 8-10 | -6.1 | 8-10 | 3-14 | 69.3 | 35.6 | 38.9% | 39.8 | 68.9 | 32.5 | 42.8% | 40.6 | Home Games | 4-6 | -6.2 | 4-6 | 3-6 | 70.6 | 37.0 | 37.7% | 38.5 | 72.6 | 34.4 | 45.2% | 42.2 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.4 | 3-2 | 1-3 | 69.8 | 35.2 | 38.2% | 43.4 | 65.8 | 27.8 | 39.7% | 38.2 | Division Games | 4-8 | -7.8 | 4-8 | 2-9 | 68.1 | 36.0 | 37.4% | 40.4 | 69.4 | 31.5 | 43.6% | 41.3 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.3 | 35.6 | 25-64 | 38.9% | 5-16 | 34.5% | 14-17 | 79.0% | 40 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 10 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 76.7 | 38.1 | 29-68 | 41.8% | 5-15 | 32.0% | 15-19 | 77.9% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 70.6 | 37.0 | 25-65 | 37.7% | 6-17 | 36.5% | 15-19 | 81.0% | 38 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 9 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 68.9 | 32.5 | 25-59 | 42.8% | 4-12 | 32.0% | 14-18 | 80.1% | 41 | 8 | 13 | 18 | 8 | 16 | 6 | vs opponents averaging | 75.3 | 36.8 | 28-68 | 41.6% | 4-14 | 31.8% | 15-19 | 77.4% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 72.6 | 34.4 | 28-61 | 45.2% | 4-12 | 32.5% | 14-17 | 81.9% | 42 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 6 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 68.7, INDIANA 68.7 |
| | |
|
|
6/26/2013 | NEW YORK | 87-74 | W | -400 | 33-79 | 41.8% | 44 | 4 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 47 | 17 | 6/29/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 94-82 | W | -175 | 31-80 | 38.7% | 55 | 7 | 32-72 | 44.4% | 44 | 13 | 7/2/2013 | SEATTLE | 60-69 | L | -360 | 20-67 | 29.9% | 47 | 12 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 43 | 11 | 7/7/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 93-64 | W | -155 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 44 | 10 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 48 | 15 | 7/10/2013 | WASHINGTON | 89-85 | W | -500 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 48 | 9 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 41 | 11 | 7/12/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 83-70 | W | -165 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 40 | 12 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 45 | 12 | 7/18/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 75-55 | W | -175 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 46 | 10 | 22-69 | 31.9% | 49 | 18 | 7/20/2013 | NEW YORK | 80-69 | W | -850 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 38 | 12 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 48 | 14 | 7/24/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 78-82 | L | -175 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 45 | 9 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 46 | 12 | 8/2/2013 | WASHINGTON | 85-78 | W | -270 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 41 | 10 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 41 | 19 | 8/3/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2013 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2013 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/13/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/15/2013 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2013 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/25/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 60-76 | L | +650 | 22-61 | 36.1% | 48 | 23 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 32 | 15 | 6/28/2013 | TULSA | 80-69 | W | -155 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 40 | 13 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 40 | 17 | 6/30/2013 | SEATTLE | 71-63 | W | -210 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 37 | 20 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 28 | 17 | 7/6/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 78-66 | W | -200 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 34 | 8 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 42 | 21 | 7/11/2013 | MINNESOTA | 62-69 | L | +155 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 39 | 15 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 46 | 8 | 7/13/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 74-53 | W | +105 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 38 | 7 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 44 | 22 | 7/19/2013 | WASHINGTON | 77-70 | W | -210 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 41 | 13 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 38 | 21 | 7/21/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 65-52 | W | +170 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 44 | 12 | 17-55 | 30.9% | 40 | 15 | 7/23/2013 | NEW YORK | 72-77 | L | -270 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 46 | 7 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 43 | 12 | 7/25/2013 | @ TULSA | 71-60 | W | +145 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 38 | 18 | 20-55 | 36.4% | 34 | 19 | 8/1/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 64-70 | L | +170 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 48 | 13 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 36 | 8 | 8/3/2013 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2013 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2013 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/10/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2013 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/17/2013 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
INDIANA is 24-6 (+9.5 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
INDIANA is 8-2 (+5.8 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
INDIANA is 14-2 (+3.5 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
INDIANA is 5-1 (+4.0 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/22/2013 | CHICAGO | 71 | -6 | SU ATS | 35 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 48 | 10 | 14 | | INDIANA | 61 | 145 | Under | 37 | 20-63 | 31.7% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 35 | 6 | 9 | 9/1/2012 | CHICAGO | 64 | 149 | Under | 31 | 23-56 | 41.1% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 39 | 11 | 20 | | INDIANA | 81 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 45 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 5-13 | 38.5% | 18-19 | 94.7% | 33 | 8 | 9 | 7/7/2012 | CHICAGO | 86 | 145.5 | ATS | 33 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 14-22 | 63.6% | 51 | 12 | 24 | | INDIANA | 88 | -9.5 | SU Over | 37 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 8-22 | 36.4% | 28-38 | 73.7% | 40 | 10 | 15 | 6/27/2012 | INDIANA | 81 | -1 | SU ATS | 37 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 11-19 | 57.9% | 14-20 | 70.0% | 35 | 7 | 10 | | CHICAGO | 72 | 145 | Over | 33 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 16-25 | 64.0% | 46 | 9 | 15 | 6/16/2012 | CHICAGO | 70 | 149.5 | Over | 38 | 28-55 | 50.9% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 9-17 | 52.9% | 37 | 6 | 21 | | INDIANA | 84 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 42 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 33 | 7 | 11 | 5/25/2012 | INDIANA | 83 | 149 | SU ATS | 37 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 20-26 | 76.9% | 37 | 4 | 15 | | CHICAGO | 72 | -2.5 | Over | 35 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 3-20 | 15.0% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 46 | 14 | 22 |
|
| | |
|
Lin is 33-42 against the money line (-24.7 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lin 71.1, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 17-35 against the money line (-23.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lin 69.4, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 27-45 against the money line (-26.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lin 70.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Pokey is 6-14 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in road games after a division game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 73.6, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 5-12 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in road games after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 72.6, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 1-7 against the money line (-7.2 Units) in road games after 3 consecutive division games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 71.8, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 27-33 against the money line (-20.8 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 7-16 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 72.9, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 8-14 against the money line (-10.7 Units) off a home win as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 17-26 against the money line (-18.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 3-11 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 71.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 1-8 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 71.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 15-25 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 7-17 against the money line (-11.3 Units) in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 72.9, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 15-26 against the money line (-20.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 27-38 against the money line (-24.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 11-26 against the money line (-25.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Pokey is 28-37 against the money line (-21.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 87-56 against the money line (+12.4 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.7, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 75-47 against the money line (+17.1 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.9, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 50-34 against the money line (+12.8 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 37-23 against the money line (+14.1 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 79.3, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 37-18 against the money line (+12.2 Units) off a road loss as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.6, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 47-21 against the money line (+28.7 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.1, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Lin is 14-5 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.4, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 44-19 against the money line (+26.4 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.2, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Lin is 11-2 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 81.3, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Lin is 64-37 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.4, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 31-10 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 79.7, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 52-34 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 47-29 against the money line (+9.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 69-39 against the money line (+16.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.6, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 104-73 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.1, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 69-46 against the money line (+11.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.0, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 100-68 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.4, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 22-13 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 81.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 31-19 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 22-14 against the money line (+8.9 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.3, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 100-68 against the money line (+9.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.1, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 41-35 against the money line (+8.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 19-12 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.1, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 1 times, while the road underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 0 times, while the road underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[G] 08/03/2013 - Jeanette Pohlen is upgraded to probable Saturday vs. Chicago Sky ( Knee ) | [F] 08/02/2013 - Tamika Catchings is upgraded to probable Saturday vs. Chicago Sky ( Personal ) | [G] 08/02/2013 - Erin Phillips "?" Saturday vs. Chicago Sky ( Knee ) | [G] 06/21/2013 - Katie Douglas out indefinitely ( Back ) | [C] 06/21/2013 - Jessica Davenport out for season ( Tibia ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/27/2024 2:17:26 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|