| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
First Half Results
NEW YORK |
|
|
72
| 33
Final
34 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 651 | CONNECTICUT | 72 | | 652 | NEW YORK | -2.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents, off a home win.
(230-153 since 1997.) (60.1%, +61.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
 - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win against opponent off an road win where they scored 85 or more points.
(67-33 since 1997.) (67%, +30.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(79-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.8%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (NEW YORK) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, playing with 2 days rest.
(31-11 since 1997.) (73.8%, +18.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%).
(188-114 since 1997.) (62.3%, +62.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games.
(140-85 since 1997.) (62.2%, +46.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG).
(68-34 since 1997.) (66.7%, +30.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - after one or more consecutive overs.
(363-232 since 1997.) (61%, +107.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - after one or more consecutive overs against opponent after 1 or more consecutive unders.
(177-105 since 1997.) (62.8%, +61.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(289-171 since 1997.) (62.8%, +100.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record.
(95-42 since 1997.) (69.3%, +48.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(66-27 since 1997.) (71%, +36.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(36-12 since 1997.) (75%, +22.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games.
(273-160 since 1997.) (63%, +97 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - with a losing record.
(261-167 since 1997.) (61%, +77.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(173-107 since 1997.) (61.8%, +55.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(112-62 since 1997.) (64.4%, +43.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival.
(123-73 since 1997.) (62.8%, +42.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - off a win against a division rival.
(269-158 since 1997.) (63%, +95.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - off a win against a division rival, in August or September games.
(95-54 since 1997.) (63.8%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - off a win against a division rival, with a losing record.
(60-26 since 1997.) (69.8%, +31.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - off a win against a division rival against opponent off a home win.
(87-45 since 1997.) (65.9%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - after allowing 75 points or more.
(317-209 since 1997.) (60.3%, +87.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - after scoring 75 points or more.
(321-225 since 1997.) (58.8%, +73.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts.
(373-260 since 1997.) (58.9%, +87 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - after playing a road game.
(386-263 since 1997.) (59.5%, +96.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(408-255 since 1997.) (61.5%, +127.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(411-250 since 1997.) (62.2%, +136 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in August or September games.
(138-86 since 1997.) (61.6%, +43.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a losing record.
(92-49 since 1997.) (65.2%, +38.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - vs. division opponents.
(835-624 since 1997.) (57.2%, +148.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - after a division game.
(856-636 since 1997.) (57.4%, +156.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - after a division game against opponent after 2 consecutive division games.
(355-254 since 1997.) (58.3%, +75.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - after one or more consecutive overs.
(647-485 since 1997.) (57.2%, +113.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record.
(153-92 since 1997.) (62.4%, +51.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(103-60 since 1997.) (63.2%, +37 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - with a losing record.
(467-338 since 1997.) (58%, +95.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(192-123 since 1997.) (61%, +56.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - off a win against a division rival.
(441-318 since 1997.) (58.1%, +91.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(85-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +36.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(206-125 since 1997.) (62.2%, +68.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, on Saturday games.
(38-15 since 1997.) (71.7%, +21.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (NEW YORK) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(671-497 since 1997.) (57.4%, +124.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in August or September games.
(267-170 since 1997.) (61.1%, +80 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents.
(494-319 since 1997.) (60.8%, +143.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(346-227 since 1997.) (60.4%, +96.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents, after 2 consecutive division games.
(232-150 since 1997.) (60.7%, +67 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents, off a win against a division rival.
(188-112 since 1997.) (62.7%, +64.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents, off a home win.
(192-116 since 1997.) (62.3%, +64.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after a division game.
(455-303 since 1997.) (60%, +121.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 consecutive division games.
(299-189 since 1997.) (61.3%, +91.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(143-85 since 1997.) (62.7%, +49.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(296-202 since 1997.) (59.4%, +73.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(299-180 since 1997.) (62.4%, +101 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games.
(129-76 since 1997.) (62.9%, +45.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%).
(196-118 since 1997.) (62.4%, +66.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive unders.
(443-267 since 1997.) (62.4%, +149.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(238-118 since 1997.) (66.9%, +108.2 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive unders.
(138-66 since 1997.) (67.6%, +65.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games.
(233-146 since 1997.) (61.5%, +72.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(65-30 since 1997.) (68.4%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games against opponent after having won 2 of their last 3 games.
(92-49 since 1997.) (65.2%, +38.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(88-44 since 1997.) (66.7%, +39.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(281-169 since 1997.) (62.4%, +95.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - off a win against a division rival.
(256-148 since 1997.) (63.4%, +93.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win.
(274-158 since 1997.) (63.4%, +100.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season.
(384-267 since 1997.) (59%, +90.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after playing a home game.
(398-252 since 1997.) (61.2%, +120.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(178-89 since 1997.) (66.7%, +80.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents.
(114-65 since 1997.) (63.7%, +42.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games.
(138-67 since 1997.) (67.3%, +64.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents.
(87-46 since 1997.) (65.4%, +36.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games.
(105-45 since 1997.) (70%, +55.5 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents.
(65-28 since 1997.) (69.9%, +34.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(104-45 since 1997.) (69.8%, +54.5 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games.
(55-21 since 1997.) (72.4%, +31.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a losing record.
(42-16 since 1997.) (72.4%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games.
(81-41 since 1997.) (66.4%, +35.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games.
(86-37 since 1997.) (69.9%, +45.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games.
(47-18 since 1997.) (72.3%, +27.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(412-233 since 1997.) (63.9%, +155.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(199-125 since 1997.) (61.4%, +61.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(436-242 since 1997.) (64.3%, +169.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in August or September games.
(145-76 since 1997.) (65.6%, +61.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, on Saturday games.
(83-44 since 1997.) (65.4%, +34.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents.
(835-624 since 1997.) (57.2%, +148.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(532-380 since 1997.) (58.3%, +114 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(330-235 since 1997.) (58.4%, +71.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a win against a division rival.
(123-71 since 1997.) (63.4%, +44.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - off a win against a division rival.
(423-295 since 1997.) (58.9%, +98.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(271-180 since 1997.) (60.1%, +73 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents.
(181-115 since 1997.) (61.1%, +54.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games.
(205-133 since 1997.) (60.7%, +58.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games.
(148-86 since 1997.) (63.2%, +53.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents.
(99-51 since 1997.) (66%, +42.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games.
(156-93 since 1997.) (62.7%, +53.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(144-77 since 1997.) (65.2%, +59.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games.
(75-36 since 1997.) (67.6%, +35.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games.
(118-67 since 1997.) (63.8%, +44.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games.
(120-61 since 1997.) (66.3%, +52.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games.
(64-30 since 1997.) (68.1%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(673-461 since 1997.) (59.3%, +165.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(161-99 since 1997.) (61.9%, +52.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(709-479 since 1997.) (59.7%, +182.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - in August or September games.
(267-170 since 1997.) (61.1%, +80 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - playing with 2 days rest.
(179-117 since 1997.) (60.5%, +50.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - vs. division opponents.
(494-319 since 1997.) (60.8%, +143.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(326-204 since 1997.) (61.5%, +101.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - after a division game.
(520-318 since 1997.) (62.1%, +170.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - after a division game against opponent after 2 consecutive division games.
(226-128 since 1997.) (63.8%, +85.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games.
(129-76 since 1997.) (62.9%, +45.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%).
(194-124 since 1997.) (61%, +57.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (NEW YORK) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games.
(154-92 since 1997.) (62.6%, +52.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 69 | | 35 | | 27-73 | 37.6% | 4-14 | 29.5% | 10-13 | 73.8% | 43 | 12 | 11 | | NEW YORK | 73 | | 37 | | 29-68 | 42.0% | 4-11 | 36.8% | 12-15 | 76.4% | 51 | 13 | 16 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT covered the first half line 512 times, while NEW YORK covered the first half line 488 times.
No Edge. | In 1000 simulated games, 495 games went under first half total, while 467 games went over first half total.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
NEW YORK is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 36.3, OPPONENT 38.1 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.8, OPPONENT 37.8 | CONNECTICUT is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in road games when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.3, OPPONENT 37.9 | CONNECTICUT is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.8, OPPONENT 42.2 | NEW YORK is 65-42 against the 1rst half line (+18.8 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.0, OPPONENT 30.0 | NEW YORK is 75-52 against the 1rst half line (+17.8 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.4, OPPONENT 32.5 | NEW YORK is 47-28 against the 1rst half line (+16.2 Units) when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.7, OPPONENT 32.9 |
|
NEW YORK is 126-56 UNDER (+64.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.5, OPPONENT 33.3 | NEW YORK is 83-24 UNDER (+56.6 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.0, OPPONENT 30.0 | NEW YORK is 83-43 UNDER (+35.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.4, OPPONENT 32.5 | NEW YORK is 90-32 UNDER (+54.8 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.2, OPPONENT 32.1 | NEW YORK is 108-57 UNDER (+45.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.0, OPPONENT 33.5 | NEW YORK is 102-51 UNDER (+45.9 Units) the 1rst half total in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.8, OPPONENT 33.4 | NEW YORK is 102-34 UNDER (+64.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.9, OPPONENT 32.3 | NEW YORK is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 31.3, OPPONENT 37.1 | NEW YORK is 80-38 UNDER (+38.2 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit 3 to 6 more turnovers than their opponents since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.1, OPPONENT 33.3 | NEW YORK is 51-23 UNDER (+25.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.7, OPPONENT 32.9 | NEW YORK is 72-33 UNDER (+35.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.6, OPPONENT 33.5 | NEW YORK is 67-41 UNDER (+21.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.8, OPPONENT 33.8 | NEW YORK is 215-98 UNDER (+107.2 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.0, OPPONENT 33.1 |
|
| | | | |
|
NEW YORK is 56-83 against the 1rst half line (-35.3 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.6, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.7, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 7-16 against the 1rst half line (-10.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.0, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 65-90 against the 1rst half line (-34.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.6, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.6, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-26 against the 1rst half line (-12.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.5, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-17 against the 1rst half line (-10.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.0, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-22 against the 1rst half line (-14.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.3, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-18 against the 1rst half line (-10.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.3, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-26 against the 1rst half line (-14.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.8, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.6, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-15 against the 1rst half line (-13.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.6, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 76-105 against the 1rst half line (-39.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.1, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-21 against the 1rst half line (-15.1 Units) versus poor ball handling teams - committing >=17 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.0, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-32 against the 1rst half line (-18.2 Units) versus poor ball handling teams - committing >=17 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.0, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 25-12 against the 1rst half line (+11.8 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.9, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 29.4, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 153-76 UNDER (+69.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.6, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 82-53 UNDER (+23.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.6, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 59-25 UNDER (+31.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.8, OPPONENT 31.6 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 33-14 UNDER (+17.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.0, OPPONENT 31.7 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 15-2 UNDER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.2, OPPONENT 30.4 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 55-19 UNDER (+34.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.8, OPPONENT 31.4 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 100-69 UNDER (+24.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 166-99 UNDER (+57.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.7, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 147-75 UNDER (+64.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.5, OPPONENT 32.3 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 214-102 UNDER (+101.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.5, OPPONENT 32.1 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 203-113 UNDER (+78.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.1, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 306-155 UNDER (+135.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.1, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 71-49 UNDER (+17.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.5, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 55-34 UNDER (+17.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.7, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 71-46 UNDER (+20.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.4, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 118-70 UNDER (+41.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.1, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 90-57 UNDER (+27.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.7, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 152-84 UNDER (+59.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.4, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 78-39 UNDER (+35.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.5, OPPONENT 31.9 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 64-37 UNDER (+23.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.7, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 94-53 UNDER (+35.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.8, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK is 120-162 against the 1rst half line (-58.2 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.4, OPPONENT 31.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 103-135 against the 1rst half line (-45.5 Units) as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.7, OPPONENT 31.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) in a home game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.8, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 36.9, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 31.9, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 57-83 against the 1rst half line (-34.3 Units) after a win by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.2, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.2, OPPONENT 45.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 31.4, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 37.2, OPPONENT 45.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 0-10 against the 1rst half line (-11.0 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.5, OPPONENT 45.5 - (Rating = 5*) | NEW YORK is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 31.9, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 37.9, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 42-66 against the 1rst half line (-30.6 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 31.5, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 20-46 against the 1rst half line (-30.6 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 30.2, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 12-34 against the 1rst half line (-25.4 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 29.9, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) versus the first half line in all games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.2, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.4, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-17 against the 1rst half line (-10.7 Units) versus the 1rst half line in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.9, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-17 against the 1rst half line (-10.7 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.9, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.0, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-23 against the 1rst half line (-14.3 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.7, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-19 against the 1rst half line (-12.9 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.5, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-20 against the 1rst half line (-13.0 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.3, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-53 against the 1rst half line (-27.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.9, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-24 against the 1rst half line (-15.4 Units) after 3 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.7, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.4, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-43 against the 1rst half line (-23.3 Units) in road games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.4, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-8 against the 1rst half line (-8.8 Units) in road games off a home win against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.6, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in road games off a win against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.8, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-13 against the 1rst half line (-11.3 Units) off a home win over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.1, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-18 against the 1rst half line (-11.8 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.7, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.8, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 57-34 OVER (+19.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.8, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.2, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 30.8, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-11 UNDER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.1, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 383-201 UNDER (+161.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.2, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 193-87 UNDER (+97.3 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.4, OPPONENT 31.5 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 161-74 UNDER (+79.6 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.7, OPPONENT 31.5 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 112-50 UNDER (+57.0 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.1, OPPONENT 32.0 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 60-24 UNDER (+33.6 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.2, OPPONENT 31.2 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 31.2, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 79-32 UNDER (+43.8 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.0, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 31.2, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 135-74 UNDER (+53.6 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.3, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 61-32 UNDER (+25.8 Units) the 1rst half total on Saturday games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.6, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 94-41 UNDER (+48.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing with 2 days rest since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.3, OPPONENT 32.3 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 238-129 UNDER (+96.1 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.1, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a division game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 31.0, OPPONENT 31.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 139-94 UNDER (+35.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.3, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 183-113 UNDER (+58.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.2, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 43-25 UNDER (+15.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games with 11 or more offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.2, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 60-34 UNDER (+22.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.5, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 169-82 UNDER (+78.8 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.2, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 84-40 UNDER (+40.0 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.5, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 136-70 UNDER (+59.0 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.7, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 152-81 UNDER (+62.9 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.6, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 87-42 UNDER (+40.8 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.3, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 28-14 UNDER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a win by 10 points or more as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.2, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 68-42 UNDER (+21.8 Units) the 1rst half total off an upset win as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.7, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 42-24 UNDER (+15.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.3, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 59-18 UNDER (+39.2 Units) the 1rst half total off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 31.6, OPPONENT 31.3 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 127-56 UNDER (+65.4 Units) the 1rst half total off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.8, OPPONENT 32.2 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 71-45 UNDER (+21.5 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.9, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 112-71 UNDER (+33.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.1, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 95-40 UNDER (+51.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a win by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.2, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 30-16 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.3, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 124-70 UNDER (+47.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.2, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 75-34 UNDER (+37.6 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.8, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 68-43 UNDER (+20.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 35.5, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 180-100 UNDER (+70.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.7, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 94-53 UNDER (+35.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.1, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 60-27 UNDER (+30.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.4, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 37-17 UNDER (+18.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.4, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 146-80 UNDER (+58.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.9, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 53-31 UNDER (+18.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.5, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 23-10 UNDER (+12.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive games as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.7, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 178-97 UNDER (+71.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.9, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 74-46 UNDER (+23.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 34.2, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 35-16 UNDER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive road games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 33.0, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 203-91 UNDER (+102.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.7, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 199-98 UNDER (+91.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 32.9, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 69-36 UNDER (+29.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 31.5, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 44-21 UNDER (+20.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 30.2, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 30-14 UNDER (+14.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 29.9, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 5-12 | -11.6 | 6-11 | 4-12 | 70.6 | 33.2 | 38.8% | 45.2 | 74.8 | 37.8 | 41.5% | 46.8 | | Road Games | 1-7 | -5.9 | 2-6 | 1-7 | 66.4 | 31.9 | 36.9% | 44.9 | 73.9 | 37.2 | 41.0% | 50.2 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.2 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 66.2 | 28.4 | 36.3% | 42.8 | 69.2 | 33.6 | 40.1% | 52.2 | | Division Games | 3-7 | -5.4 | 5-5 | 2-7 | 70.7 | 32.0 | 40.1% | 45.8 | 73.7 | 38.4 | 40.9% | 45.5 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 70.6 | 33.2 | 27-70 | 38.8% | 4-13 | 31.3% | 12-16 | 73.5% | 45 | 11 | 15 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75.6 | 37.2 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 5-14 | 32.2% | 15-19 | 78.5% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 66.4 | 31.9 | 26-71 | 36.9% | 4-15 | 28.9% | 10-14 | 71.6% | 45 | 12 | 13 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.8 | 37.8 | 29-69 | 41.5% | 4-12 | 32.9% | 13-18 | 75.7% | 47 | 12 | 13 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.2 | 37.7 | 28-67 | 41.4% | 5-15 | 32.3% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 73.9 | 37.2 | 29-70 | 41.0% | 4-12 | 31.6% | 13-18 | 70.8% | 50 | 15 | 14 | 15 | 8 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 8-11 | -0.6 | 10-9 | 7-11 | 71.1 | 33.6 | 41.2% | 47.0 | 76.2 | 37.5 | 39.4% | 43.2 | | Home Games | 5-4 | +0.8 | 4-5 | 2-7 | 69.1 | 31.2 | 40.7% | 48.9 | 72.9 | 33.8 | 37.3% | 43.4 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +1.1 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 68.4 | 31.4 | 38.0% | 48.2 | 74.0 | 37.2 | 37.7% | 44.4 | | Division Games | 5-7 | +1.6 | 6-6 | 4-7 | 69.5 | 33.6 | 39.9% | 47.4 | 76.5 | 38.7 | 39.4% | 43.5 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 71.1 | 33.6 | 28-67 | 41.2% | 4-11 | 34.8% | 12-16 | 75.9% | 47 | 11 | 15 | 18 | 6 | 17 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75 | 37.2 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 4-13 | 32.6% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 69.1 | 31.2 | 27-67 | 40.7% | 3-11 | 28.3% | 12-16 | 73.1% | 49 | 12 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 19 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.2 | 37.5 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 6-20 | 30.4% | 14-18 | 78.1% | 43 | 11 | 16 | 16 | 10 | 11 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.4 | 38 | 28-67 | 41.4% | 5-15 | 32.0% | 15-19 | 78.6% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 72.9 | 33.8 | 27-71 | 37.3% | 7-20 | 33.1% | 13-17 | 77.6% | 43 | 11 | 14 | 17 | 11 | 13 | 5 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 70.8, NEW YORK 72 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/29/2013 | PHOENIX | 70-89 | 32-38 | 2.5 | L | 81 | U | 18-67 | 26.9% | 51 | 11 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 48 | 12 | | 7/2/2013 | TULSA | 88-69 | 43-34 | -3 | W | 74 | O | 32-63 | 50.8% | 49 | 13 | 26-77 | 33.8% | 44 | 9 | | 7/6/2013 | @ INDIANA | 66-78 | 23-41 | 2.5 | L | 71.5 | U | 24-57 | 42.1% | 42 | 21 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 34 | 8 | | 7/12/2013 | CHICAGO | 70-83 | 35-50 | 2 | L | 79 | O | 30-73 | 41.1% | 45 | 12 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 40 | 12 | | 7/14/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 86-84 | 34-32 | -4 | L | 76.5 | U | 34-71 | 47.9% | 38 | 7 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 46 | 14 | | 7/19/2013 | @ TULSA | 58-64 | 28-27 | -1 | T | 78.5 | U | 21-72 | 29.2% | 46 | 15 | 25-75 | 33.3% | 66 | 24 | | 7/20/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 52-60 | 35-35 | 0.5 | W | 77 | U | 21-72 | 29.2% | 46 | 11 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 48 | 16 | | 7/24/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 65-74 | 20-40 | 5.5 | L | 75 | U | 23-65 | 35.4% | 48 | 14 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 53 | 13 | | 8/1/2013 | INDIANA | 70-64 | 25-34 | -2.5 | L | 69 | U | 27-67 | 40.3% | 36 | 8 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 48 | 13 | | 8/3/2013 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2013 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2013 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2013 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2013 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/26/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 74-87 | 42-44 | 5 | W | 74.5 | O | 27-62 | 43.5% | 47 | 17 | 33-79 | 41.8% | 44 | 4 | | 6/28/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 67-62 | 30-30 | 2 | W | 71 | U | 26-60 | 43.3% | 52 | 21 | 23-68 | 33.8% | 36 | 7 | | 7/2/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 87-94 | 41-46 | 7 | W | 81.5 | O | 33-68 | 48.5% | 43 | 13 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 44 | 7 | | 7/4/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 89-97 | 37-60 | 7.5 | L | 77.5 | O | 36-75 | 48.0% | 34 | 14 | 40-62 | 64.5% | 29 | 15 | | 7/7/2013 | CHICAGO | 64-93 | 31-42 | 1.5 | L | 74.5 | U | 24-72 | 33.3% | 48 | 15 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 44 | 10 | | 7/9/2013 | SEATTLE | 66-57 | 36-19 | -3.5 | W | 70 | U | 25-62 | 40.3% | 45 | 17 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 38 | 18 | | 7/13/2013 | INDIANA | 53-74 | 34-37 | -1 | L | 69 | O | 21-55 | 38.2% | 44 | 22 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 38 | 7 | | 7/18/2013 | CHICAGO | 55-75 | 25-41 | 2 | L | 75 | U | 22-69 | 31.9% | 49 | 18 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 46 | 10 | | 7/20/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 69-80 | 42-39 | 7 | W | 74.5 | O | 26-72 | 36.1% | 48 | 14 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 38 | 12 | | 7/23/2013 | @ INDIANA | 77-72 | 33-42 | 3.5 | L | 68 | O | 27-61 | 44.3% | 43 | 12 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 46 | 7 | | 7/25/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 53-65 | 22-31 | 1.5 | L | 72.5 | U | 16-60 | 26.7% | 48 | 16 | 19-61 | 31.1% | 52 | 13 | | 7/31/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 88-78 | 35-33 | 3 | W | 72 | U | 37-75 | 49.3% | 53 | 16 | 28-77 | 36.4% | 40 | 11 | | 8/3/2013 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2013 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/10/2013 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2013 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2013 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CONNECTICUT is 35-28 versus the first half line when playing against NEW YORK since 1997 | | 42 of 62 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 8-5 versus the first half line when playing against NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons | | 7 of 13 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 17-13 versus the first half line when playing against NEW YORK since 1997 | | 18 of 29 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| NEW YORK is 3-3 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons | | 5 of 6 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/14/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 68 | 147.5 | Under | 33 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 8-11 | 72.7% | 43 | 7 | 11 | | | NEW YORK | 78 | 0 | SU ATS | 24 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 6-12 | 50.0% | 16-25 | 64.0% | 63 | 20 | 16 | 5/25/2013 | NEW YORK | 69 | 150 | | 42 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 10-10 | 100.0% | 45 | 8 | 16 | | | CONNECTICUT | 81 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 31-78 | 39.7% | 10-26 | 38.5% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 48 | 14 | 10 | 9/29/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 75 | -4 | SU ATS | 27 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 51 | 15 | 13 | | | NEW YORK | 62 | 151.5 | Under | 33 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 5-7 | 71.4% | 31 | 6 | 10 | 9/27/2012 | NEW YORK | 60 | 154 | ATS | 34 | 20-77 | 26.0% | 5-23 | 21.7% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 52 | 17 | 12 | | | CONNECTICUT | 65 | -9.5 | SU Under | 41 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 7-9 | 77.8% | 47 | 7 | 13 | 8/18/2012 | NEW YORK | 74 | 154.5 | Over | 43 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 9-18 | 50.0% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 36 | 5 | 26 | | | CONNECTICUT | 85 | -7 | SU ATS | 47 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 37 | 6 | 13 | 8/16/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 66 | -3 | Under | 35 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 4-5 | 80.0% | 47 | 12 | 17 | | | NEW YORK | 79 | 153.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 5-6 | 83.3% | 36 | 9 | 6 | 6/15/2012 | NEW YORK | 55 | 162 | Under | 27 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 1-10 | 10.0% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 35 | 6 | 19 | | | CONNECTICUT | 97 | -8 | SU ATS | 61 | 36-71 | 50.7% | 4-9 | 44.4% | 21-24 | 87.5% | 45 | 11 | 10 | 5/20/2012 | NEW YORK | 77 | 154 | Over | 40 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 15-22 | 68.2% | 41 | 10 | 13 | | | CONNECTICUT | 92 | -7 | SU ATS | 44 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 26-29 | 89.7% | 46 | 10 | 11 | 5/19/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 78 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 33 | 31-78 | 39.7% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 50 | 14 | 11 | | | NEW YORK | 73 | 154 | Under | 41 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 2-15 | 13.3% | 15-24 | 62.5% | 54 | 13 | 10 |
|
| | |
|
Bill is 4-15 against the 1rst half line (-12.5 Units) in home games after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 32.5, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 20-44 against the 1rst half line (-28.4 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 34.9, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 31.9, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 31-49 against the 1rst half line (-22.9 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 34.7, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) in home games versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 34.4, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 15-30 against the 1rst half line (-18.0 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 36.5, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Anne is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.2, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 44-66 against the 1rst half line (-28.6 Units) off a home win in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 33.8, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 24-41 against the 1rst half line (-21.1 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 31.8, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 32-17 against the 1rst half line (+13.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 39.7, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Anne is 203-152 UNDER (+35.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.7, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 59-38 UNDER (+17.2 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 32.7, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 106-70 UNDER (+29.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 33.1, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 143-92 UNDER (+41.8 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.4, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 133-93 UNDER (+30.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.9, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 96-62 UNDER (+27.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.7, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 50-31 UNDER (+15.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.7, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 55-33 UNDER (+18.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 33.4, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 70-43 UNDER (+22.7 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.1, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 30-15 UNDER (+13.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 32.4, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 80-45 UNDER (+30.5 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.2, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 45-26 UNDER (+16.4 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 33.2, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 75-39 UNDER (+32.1 Units) the 1rst half total off a win against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 33.7, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 39-19 UNDER (+18.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games off a home win in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 31.8, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 60-40 UNDER (+16.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a game as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 33.1, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 113-57 UNDER (+50.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 33.3, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 51-27 UNDER (+21.3 Units) the 1rst half total after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 33.3, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 107-66 UNDER (+34.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 33.8, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 84-60 UNDER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.4, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 95-58 UNDER (+31.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 33.4, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 132-83 UNDER (+40.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 33.6, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 120-85 UNDER (+26.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.3, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 172-119 UNDER (+41.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.3, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 34-13 UNDER (+19.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 32.0, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 44-20 UNDER (+22.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 31.8, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 52-26 UNDER (+23.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.3, OPPONENT 32.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor ball handling teams - committing >=17 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 33.8, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 31.2, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 31.2, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a division game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 31.0, OPPONENT 31.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 44-25 UNDER (+16.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.4, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 19-7 UNDER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 33.1, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 32-15 UNDER (+15.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 32.2, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 20-3 UNDER (+16.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 30.3, OPPONENT 31.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Bill is 13-2 UNDER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 31.8, OPPONENT 31.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 10-1 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 30.7, OPPONENT 29.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 33-18 UNDER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.5, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 122 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 115 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 20 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 11 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 38 games went under the first half total, while 31 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 5 games went over the first half total, while 3 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 25 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 21 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 4 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 1 times. | | Since 1997, 25 games went under the first half total, while 24 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 3 games went under the first half total, while 2 games went over the first half total. |
|
| | |
| [G] 08/01/2013 - Kara Lawson expected to miss another 2 weeks ( Knee ) | | [G] 06/16/2013 - Danielle McCray out for season ( Achilles ) | | [F] 05/25/2013 - Asjha Jones out for season ( Personal ) | |
| [G] 06/09/2013 - Essence Carson out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/19/2024 5:45:18 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|