| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES MINNESOTA |
|
| 157 | 94 Final 76 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
655 | LOS ANGELES | +155 | 656 | MINNESOTA | -175 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season. (326-130 since 1997.) (71.5%, +93.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (175-53 since 1997.) (76.8%, +66.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (128-58 since 1997.) (68.8%, +51.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (98-33 since 1997.) (74.8%, +50.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (101-24 since 1997.) (80.8%, +49.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (88-57 since 1997.) (60.7%, +32.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite against opponent off 2 or more consecutive road wins. (32-6 since 1997.) (84.2%, +23.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite against opponent off 2 or more consecutive road wins. (34-9 since 1997.) (79.1%, +23 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (128-58 since 1997.) (68.8%, +51.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents, off a close win by 3 points or less over a division rival. (170-134 since 1997.) (55.9%, +50.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after a win by 6 points or less. (91-35 since 1997.) (72.2%, +41 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents. (46-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.8%, +32 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a close loss versus opponent by 3 points or less, off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite. (46-22 since 1997.) (67.6%, +32 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a close loss versus opponent by 3 points or less, off a upset loss as a favorite. (63-42 since 1997.) (60%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - playing with 2 days rest, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season. (62-32 since 1997.) (66%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, off a close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival. (43-21 since 1997.) (67.2%, +28 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game against opponent after a win by 6 points or less. (32-5 since 1997.) (86.5%, +25.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a close loss versus opponent by 3 points or less, off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite. (33-16 since 1997.) (67.3%, +23.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (38-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +22.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor rebounding team - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game, after 3 straight games being outrebounded by opponent by 5 or more. (22-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +22.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 3 straight games being outrebounded by opponent by 5 or more. (36-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +33 units. Rating = 4*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES | 76 | | 29-63 | 46.2% | 5-16 | 34.5% | 12-16 | 75.9% | 37 | 7 | 13 | MINNESOTA | 78 | | 30-67 | 44.4% | 4-13 | 29.5% | 14-18 | 81.2% | 44 | 12 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 545 times, while LOS ANGELES won 436 times. Edge against the money line=LOS ANGELES |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 48-74 against the money line (-43.9 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.8, OPPONENT 78.6 | MINNESOTA is 61-75 against the money line (-41.2 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.8, OPPONENT 74.0 | MINNESOTA is 97-99 against the money line (-43.9 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.4, OPPONENT 73.9 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 3-10 against the money line (-8.3 Units) in road games when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.8, OPPONENT 74.7 | LOS ANGELES is 32-55 against the money line (-46.8 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 80.0 | LOS ANGELES is 7-11 against the money line (-13.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 84.5 | LOS ANGELES is 12-20 against the money line (-13.3 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.9, OPPONENT 75.6 | LOS ANGELES is 99-103 against the money line (-61.4 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 74.7 | LOS ANGELES is 69-70 against the money line (-33.9 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.7, OPPONENT 75.6 | LOS ANGELES is 157-144 against the money line (-76.4 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.6, OPPONENT 82.2 | LOS ANGELES is 7-12 against the money line (-18.7 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 78.4 | LOS ANGELES is 4-12 against the money line (-19.4 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.6, OPPONENT 75.5 | MINNESOTA is 27-7 against the money line (+13.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 71.4 | MINNESOTA is 17-3 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.4, OPPONENT 71.5 | MINNESOTA is 97-42 against the money line (+48.2 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.5, OPPONENT 72.5 | MINNESOTA is 39-14 against the money line (+15.9 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.2, OPPONENT 80.3 | MINNESOTA is 24-2 against the money line (+19.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.4, OPPONENT 74.1 |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 14-37 against the money line (-28.4 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.4, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 6-8 against the money line (-12.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 167-160 against the money line (-56.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-32 against the money line (-22.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-22 against the money line (-26.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-29 against the money line (-21.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 32-38 against the money line (-26.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 157-134 against the money line (-69.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 24-34 against the money line (-19.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-9 against the money line (-11.6 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.4, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 14-4 against the money line (+9.6 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 10-1 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in all games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.4, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-1 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in May, June, or July games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.4, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) after playing a game as favorite this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.5, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-4 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.4, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-2 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 48-25 against the money line (+16.4 Units) in road games after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 163-153 against the money line (-58.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.3, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 15-36 against the money line (-35.2 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 32-54 against the money line (-35.4 Units) off an upset win as an underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.4, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 34-39 against the money line (-33.4 Units) off a road win against a division rival since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 23-41 against the money line (-36.5 Units) off an upset win as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 69.9, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 103-151 against the money line (-80.7 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.7, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 77-118 against the money line (-76.0 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.4, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 133-148 against the money line (-71.2 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.2, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 4-7 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.2, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 38-56 against the money line (-37.2 Units) in road games in June games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 24-30 against the money line (-21.5 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 25-27 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after a division game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-10 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after 2 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 25-27 against the money line (-19.5 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-13 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.8, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-15 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-13 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-10 against the money line (-22.1 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-10 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-4 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-12 against the money line (-15.9 Units) revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-25 against the money line (-19.5 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-19 against the money line (-18.0 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-15.7 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 68.0, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-8 against the money line (-7.3 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 68.4, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-10 against the money line (-9.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-13 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.0, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-14 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.7, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 44-10 against the money line (+21.5 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 25-7 against the money line (+12.2 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.5, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 15-3 against the money line (+10.4 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 41-16 against the money line (+16.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.3, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 13-6 against the money line (+15.9 Units) after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more shots than opponent since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 29-9 against the money line (+14.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 25-6 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 53-14 against the money line (+30.4 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 15-2 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after 5 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 7-1 against the money line (+6.4 Units) after 8 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 11-1 | +8.4 | 8-4 | 6-6 | 85.4 | 43.0 | 49.0% | 38.1 | 71.4 | 33.9 | 41.4% | 42.7 | Road Games | 6-0 | +6 | 5-1 | 3-3 | 86.2 | 42.3 | 48.1% | 40.8 | 70.8 | 33.5 | 40.5% | 43.8 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2.4 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 88.2 | 45.2 | 51.8% | 36.4 | 75.6 | 36.2 | 42.5% | 40.4 | Division Games | 5-1 | +2.4 | 3-3 | 2-4 | 80.2 | 41.3 | 48.4% | 35.2 | 67.3 | 31.5 | 40.2% | 42.3 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 85.4 | 43.0 | 32-66 | 49.0% | 6-16 | 37.8% | 15-19 | 76.5% | 38 | 7 | 21 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.7 | 40.9 | 29-68 | 43.1% | 6-17 | 32.0% | 19-23 | 79.7% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 86.2 | 42.3 | 32-66 | 48.1% | 6-16 | 38.4% | 16-20 | 79.2% | 41 | 6 | 21 | 17 | 10 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.4 | 33.9 | 27-65 | 41.4% | 4-15 | 25.1% | 14-19 | 74.3% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 82.1 | 40.5 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 5-16 | 32.9% | 17-22 | 79.2% | 44 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 70.8 | 33.5 | 27-67 | 40.5% | 4-14 | 27.9% | 12-19 | 67.0% | 44 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 13-0 | +12.4 | 9-4 | 6-7 | 86.5 | 45.2 | 48.1% | 41.7 | 73.8 | 38.0 | 41.1% | 39.4 | Home Games | 5-0 | +4 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 85.0 | 43.8 | 47.1% | 41.2 | 70.8 | 33.4 | 40.3% | 41.4 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +4.4 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 89.6 | 46.2 | 50.3% | 42.6 | 74.0 | 41.6 | 39.0% | 38.6 | Division Games | 7-0 | +7.4 | 5-2 | 3-4 | 85.0 | 43.6 | 46.4% | 42.0 | 74.6 | 39.0 | 43.4% | 37.9 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 86.5 | 45.2 | 33-68 | 48.1% | 5-14 | 33.5% | 16-19 | 83.8% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 19 | 10 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 84 | 41.5 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 6-16 | 33.6% | 18-23 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 85.0 | 43.8 | 33-69 | 47.1% | 5-15 | 32.4% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 41 | 9 | 22 | 17 | 10 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.8 | 38.0 | 27-65 | 41.1% | 5-17 | 26.0% | 16-20 | 79.5% | 39 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 7 | 16 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 83.1 | 40.9 | 29-67 | 43.9% | 5-17 | 32.1% | 19-24 | 80.7% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 70.8 | 33.4 | 27-66 | 40.3% | 4-19 | 22.7% | 13-17 | 78.6% | 41 | 8 | 15 | 21 | 8 | 15 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 71.2, MINNESOTA 72 |
| | |
|
|
5/15/2016 | SEATTLE | 96-66 | W | -500 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 26 | 10 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 39 | 24 | 5/20/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 97-67 | W | -330 | 37-66 | 56.1% | 36 | 11 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 41 | 21 | 5/21/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 79-72 | W | -120 | 31-88 | 35.2% | 57 | 11 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 61 | 15 | 5/24/2016 | @ CHICAGO | 93-80 | W | -155 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 37 | 8 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 40 | 15 | 5/26/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 77-72 | W | -650 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 44 | 17 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 44 | 12 | 6/2/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 68-61 | W | | 23-53 | 43.4% | 39 | 15 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 43 | 13 | 6/4/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 74-61 | W | -550 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 36 | 8 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 43 | 8 | 6/7/2016 | NEW YORK | 100-77 | W | -330 | 41-74 | 55.4% | 41 | 9 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 37 | 17 | 6/11/2016 | @ DALLAS | 97-73 | W | -450 | 38-65 | 58.5% | 35 | 19 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 34 | 21 | 6/14/2016 | CHICAGO | 98-85 | W | -360 | 39-67 | 58.2% | 31 | 6 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 36 | 9 | 6/17/2016 | PHOENIX | 77-71 | W | -550 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 36 | 8 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 44 | 15 | 6/21/2016 | MINNESOTA | 69-72 | L | -155 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 39 | 17 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 51 | 14 | 6/24/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/26/2016 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2016 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2016 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2016 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2016 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2016 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/18/2016 | @ CHICAGO | 97-80 | W | -165 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 41 | 9 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 41 | 12 | 5/22/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 78-71 | W | -500 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 11 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 42 | 15 | 5/25/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 85-78 | W | -175 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 40 | 21 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 30 | 19 | 5/27/2016 | INDIANA | 74-71 | W | -850 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 41 | 14 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 44 | 14 | 5/31/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 79-69 | W | -250 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 41 | 13 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 41 | 19 | 6/4/2016 | DALLAS | 80-63 | W | -850 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 42 | 13 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 45 | 18 | 6/7/2016 | PHOENIX | 89-81 | W | -600 | 27-73 | 37.0% | 37 | 9 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 46 | 12 | 6/10/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 110-78 | W | -330 | 38-69 | 55.1% | 37 | 10 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 47 | 18 | 6/11/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 83-76 | W | -330 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 46 | 19 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 32 | 13 | 6/14/2016 | INDIANA | 87-63 | W | | 32-65 | 49.2% | 42 | 11 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 42 | 12 | 6/19/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 96-84 | W | -650 | 41-73 | 56.2% | 37 | 10 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 33 | 14 | 6/21/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 72-69 | W | +135 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 51 | 14 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 39 | 17 | 6/24/2016 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/26/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2016 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2016 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/9/2016 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES is 43-30 (+8.3 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
MINNESOTA is 9-3 (+4.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
MINNESOTA is 20-16 (-3.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
MINNESOTA is 5-1 (+1.4 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/21/2016 | MINNESOTA | 72 | 163 | SU ATS | 38 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 51 | 12 | 14 | | LOS ANGELES | 69 | -3 | Under | 39 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 16-24 | 66.7% | 39 | 5 | 17 | 9/22/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 80 | 146 | Over | 30 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 33 | 7 | 13 | | MINNESOTA | 91 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 1-7 | 14.3% | 30-36 | 83.3% | 49 | 16 | 10 | 9/20/2015 | MINNESOTA | 71 | 145.5 | Over | 35 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 35 | 8 | 16 | | LOS ANGELES | 81 | -3 | SU ATS | 53 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 9-18 | 50.0% | 12-20 | 60.0% | 46 | 11 | 10 | 9/18/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 65 | 146.5 | ATS | 36 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 38 | 8 | 14 | | MINNESOTA | 67 | -5.5 | SU Under | 33 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 36 | 6 | 11 | 8/9/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 64 | 149.5 | Under | 32 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 39 | 9 | 16 | | MINNESOTA | 72 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 37 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 1-10 | 10.0% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 43 | 10 | 9 | 8/4/2015 | MINNESOTA | 61 | -2 | Under | 35 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 6-7 | 85.7% | 37 | 4 | 15 | | LOS ANGELES | 83 | 152.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 37-77 | 48.1% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 7-8 | 87.5% | 42 | 9 | 7 | 7/29/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 76 | 148 | ATS | 35 | 31-55 | 56.4% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 7-8 | 87.5% | 32 | 2 | 21 | | MINNESOTA | 82 | -8.5 | SU Over | 43 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 18-24 | 75.0% | 31 | 6 | 12 | 6/16/2015 | MINNESOTA | 67 | -11.5 | SU ATS | 23 | 30-57 | 52.6% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 4-7 | 57.1% | 31 | 4 | 8 | | LOS ANGELES | 52 | 144.5 | Under | 28 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 3-18 | 16.7% | 1-4 | 25.0% | 39 | 9 | 11 |
|
| | |
|
Agler is 31-18 against the money line (+15.2 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 79.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 63-53 against the money line (+18.0 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 73.0, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 123-91 against the money line (+42.2 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 73.7, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 16-8 against the money line (+17.6 Units) revenging a close loss versus opponent by 3 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 72.3, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 18-10 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 12-4 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.4, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 9-2 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 144-119 against the money line (+35.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 74.0, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 146-107 against the money line (+28.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 74.2, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 94-80 against the money line (+29.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 74.8, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Agler is 6-10 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 10-13 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.8, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 22-42 against the money line (-24.2 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 68.5, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 24-43 against the money line (-21.7 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 68.2, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 44-48 against the money line (-32.5 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 72.6, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 2-4 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 2-10 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in road games off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 68.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 5*) | Agler is 4-9 against the money line (-15.7 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 68.0, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Agler is 1-7 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in road games off a close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 63.0, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 2-8 against the money line (-7.3 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 68.4, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 2-10 against the money line (-9.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 10-13 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.0, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 7-14 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.7, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 6-8 against the money line (-12.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 12-27 against the money line (-21.0 Units) in road games versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 66.6, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 160-72 against the money line (+37.0 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 135-43 against the money line (+27.6 Units) as a favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 82-19 against the money line (+28.3 Units) as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 86-22 against the money line (+31.2 Units) in home games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 86-22 against the money line (+31.2 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 59-16 against the money line (+21.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 103-44 against the money line (+34.6 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 68-31 against the money line (+19.1 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 101-45 against the money line (+30.2 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 7-1 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more shots than opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 88.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 33-12 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 29-11 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 37-6 against the money line (+19.8 Units) in home games off a win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 38-13 against the money line (+13.5 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 111-48 against the money line (+18.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 91-39 against the money line (+18.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 77-31 against the money line (+22.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 64-23 against the money line (+19.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 114-46 against the money line (+32.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 85-32 against the money line (+22.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 62-21 against the money line (+20.3 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 49-10 against the money line (+28.1 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 37-8 against the money line (+20.9 Units) after 5 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 46-26 against the money line (+15.5 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 111-58 against the money line (+21.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 124-61 against the money line (+22.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 36-14 against the money line (+15.5 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 102-58 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 76-42 against the money line (+16.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 74-36 against the money line (+12.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.0, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 132 times, while the road underdog won straight up 92 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 15 times, while the road underdog won straight up 15 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[F] 06/23/2016 - Maya Moore injured last game, "?" Friday vs. LA Sparks ( Thigh ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/5/2024 8:03:31 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|