| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
SEATTLE |
|
|
165.5
| 81
Final
98 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 657 | CONNECTICUT | +210 | | 658 | SEATTLE | -270 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(199-71 since 1997.) (73.7%, +68.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(234-95 since 1997.) (71.1%, +61.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(131-31 since 1997.) (80.9%, +58 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(186-62 since 1997.) (75%, +51.4 units. Rating = 1*) |  - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(109-26 since 1997.) (80.7%, +51 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(152-104 since 1997.) (59.4%, +49 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(129-88 since 1997.) (59.4%, +44.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after a loss by 10 points or more.
(79-40 since 1997.) (66.4%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(151-114 since 1997.) (57%, +34.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(120-83 since 1997.) (59.1%, +33.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(53-34 since 1997.) (60.9%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going over the total by more than 24 points in their previous game against opponent after going over the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games.
(37-18 since 1997.) (67.3%, +25.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(36-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.9%, +18.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(39-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.9%, +9.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games against opponent after having lost 4 of their last 5 games.
(30-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.8%, +18.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(40-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +25.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(52-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.2%, +31.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after having lost 4 of their last 5 games against opponent after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(23-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.7%, +17.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(57-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.8%, +24.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games against opponent cold team - having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games.
(24-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.8%, +20.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after allowing 80 points or more in 4 straight games.
(23-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +12.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(39-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +14.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(88-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - in non-conference games, off a home loss.
(310-215 since 1997.) (59%, +90.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(294-287 since 1997.) (50.6%, +80.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more.
(278-256 since 1997.) (52.1%, +67.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(62-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +33.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(193-188 since 1997.) (50.7%, +62.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - in non-conference games, off a home loss against a division rival.
(176-125 since 1997.) (58.5%, +58.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(129-88 since 1997.) (59.4%, +44.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(112-67 since 1997.) (62.6%, +44.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(78-71 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.3%, +29.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(98-72 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.6%, +45.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game, with a losing record.
(97-71 since 1997.) (57.7%, +40.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(68-57 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.4%, +27.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(88-56 since 1997.) (61.1%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(151-114 since 1997.) (57%, +34.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(73-52 since 1997.) (58.4%, +34 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(44-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.1%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(43-11 since 1997.) (79.6%, +30.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game against opponent after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(36-25 since 1997.) (59%, +30.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(58-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.2%, +29.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game against opponent after going over the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games.
(31-20 since 1997.) (60.8%, +27.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(37-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +10.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record.
(26-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +16.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game against opponent after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games.
(31-23 since 1997.) (57.4%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(52-28 since 1997.) (65%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(60-51 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.1%, +24 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(23-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (50%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a close win by 3 points or less.
(34-14 since 1997.) (70.8%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(39-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.9%, +9.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(21-7 since 1997.) (75%, +14.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(34-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +27.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(64-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (61%, +37.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(26-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.1%, +29.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(45-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +30.3 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 75 | | 30-69 | 42.9% | 5-18 | 29.1% | 11-15 | 71.3% | 40 | 11 | 14 | | SEATTLE | 81 | | 29-61 | 46.9% | 6-17 | 33.9% | 18-21 | 84.1% | 41 | 8 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, SEATTLE won the game straight up 653 times, while CONNECTICUT won 328 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 68-38 against the money line (+23.8 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 74.2 | CONNECTICUT is 143-108 against the money line (+25.6 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.5, OPPONENT 73.4 | CONNECTICUT is 111-94 against the money line (+23.9 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.0, OPPONENT 73.7 | CONNECTICUT is 69-49 against the money line (+18.3 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.5, OPPONENT 72.5 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 3-9 against the money line (-7.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 87.8 | CONNECTICUT is 29-54 against the money line (-50.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.7, OPPONENT 80.0 | CONNECTICUT is 4-17 against the money line (-13.2 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.5, OPPONENT 79.8 | CONNECTICUT is 41-65 against the money line (-38.5 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.2, OPPONENT 75.8 | CONNECTICUT is 23-39 against the money line (-26.5 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.5, OPPONENT 79.5 | CONNECTICUT is 1-9 against the money line (-9.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 91.2 | CONNECTICUT is 2-9 against the money line (-8.2 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 88.4 | SEATTLE is 77-42 against the money line (+19.6 Units) in home games in games where they attempt 77 to 83 shots since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.4, OPPONENT 69.9 | SEATTLE is 77-43 against the money line (+30.4 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.9, OPPONENT 72.7 | SEATTLE is 39-19 against the money line (+15.0 Units) in home games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.1, OPPONENT 70.2 | SEATTLE is 67-49 against the money line (+33.9 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.7, OPPONENT 73.1 | SEATTLE is 60-30 against the money line (+23.8 Units) in home games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.6, OPPONENT 69.4 | SEATTLE is 82-44 against the money line (+48.2 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 71.0 | SEATTLE is 78-33 against the money line (+25.1 Units) in home games when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.3, OPPONENT 70.4 | SEATTLE is 147-116 against the money line (+37.4 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.7, OPPONENT 70.5 | SEATTLE is 6-0 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in home games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.0, OPPONENT 66.2 | SEATTLE is 110-83 against the money line (+28.9 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.8, OPPONENT 80.6 | SEATTLE is 60-20 against the money line (+53.5 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.8, OPPONENT 72.9 | SEATTLE is 9-8 against the money line (+12.2 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.3, OPPONENT 82.2 | SEATTLE is 92-55 against the money line (+23.1 Units) in home games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.8, OPPONENT 69.2 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 59-46 against the money line (+15.7 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.1, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-13 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 2-13 against the money line (-12.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.5, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 111-143 against the money line (-48.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 146-96 against the money line (+25.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.3, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 57-22 against the money line (+20.5 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.7, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 126-99 against the money line (+25.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.0, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 107-58 against the money line (+27.8 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.9, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 106-56 against the money line (+28.0 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.5, OPPONENT 68.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 144-82 against the money line (+24.9 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.0, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 86-49 against the money line (+19.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 154-131 against the money line (+28.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.6, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 104-68 against the money line (+29.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.5, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 91-56 against the money line (+22.1 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.8, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 60-35 against the money line (+20.1 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 4-1 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in road games in June games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-6 against the money line (+9.9 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-9 against the money line (+11.4 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.4, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-6 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 63-41 against the money line (+24.7 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.0, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 4-11 against the money line (-9.6 Units) after 2 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.4, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 19-25 against the money line (-22.1 Units) in home games after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.2, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 5-11 against the money line (-8.7 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 19-40 against the money line (-22.8 Units) off a home loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 68.9, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 11-20 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.5, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 3-10 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after playing a game as a home underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 5-15 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.2, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 3-10 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-10 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-13 against the money line (-10.8 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.1, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-24 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-10 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-15 against the money line (-17.0 Units) off a close home win by 3 points or less since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-8 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.3, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-23 against the money line (-20.7 Units) after a close win by 3 points or less since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-8 against the money line (-7.9 Units) after a win by 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-17 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-9 against the money line (-8.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 88.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-19 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-17 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-16 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 195-78 against the money line (+33.0 Units) as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.8, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 160-54 against the money line (+41.3 Units) as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.3, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 187-103 against the money line (+37.9 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 133-65 against the money line (+38.3 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.1, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 59-50 against the money line (+18.8 Units) on Friday since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.7, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 95-44 against the money line (+24.1 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.2, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 91-50 against the money line (+21.3 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.9, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 69-50 against the money line (+38.7 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.8, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 61-63 against the money line (+19.6 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.2, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 76-55 against the money line (+29.0 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.1, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 51-34 against the money line (+22.1 Units) in home games after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.4, OPPONENT 68.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 20-8 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in home games after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.2, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 23-15 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in home games after having lost 4 of their last 5 games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.1, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 12-3 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in home games after failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.2, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 27-17 against the money line (+18.2 Units) revenging a close loss versus opponent by 3 points or less since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.8, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 77-42 against the money line (+24.6 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.1, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 82-43 against the money line (+26.9 Units) in home games revenging a road loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.6, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 10-2 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in home games off 3 consecutive losses against division rivals since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.6, OPPONENT 67.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 100-89 against the money line (+22.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.9, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 40-16 against the money line (+21.0 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.9, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 26-9 against the money line (+16.7 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.1, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 19-5 against the money line (+13.7 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.0, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 36-12 against the money line (+18.0 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.4, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 68-28 against the money line (+22.1 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.3, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 52-17 against the money line (+22.8 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.4, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 37-12 against the money line (+18.7 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.2, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 23-5 against the money line (+16.6 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.9, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 37-9 against the money line (+21.9 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.0, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 89-57 against the money line (+25.2 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.5, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 145-138 against the money line (+23.6 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.2, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 63-60 against the money line (+22.2 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.9, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 34-19 against the money line (+29.1 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.3, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 67-64 against the money line (+30.7 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.4, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 32-29 against the money line (+22.4 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 69.5, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 3-10 | -8.2 | 6-6 | 7-6 | 80.8 | 37.9 | 42.8% | 43.6 | 87.2 | 41.3 | 47.0% | 43.1 | | Road Games | 1-4 | -3 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 80.0 | 37.6 | 43.5% | 41.2 | 89.2 | 41.2 | 47.0% | 44.8 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.6 | 2-2 | 3-2 | 87.0 | 38.4 | 45.7% | 43.4 | 89.6 | 42.8 | 47.6% | 41.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.8 | 37.9 | 30-71 | 42.8% | 5-18 | 30.1% | 15-21 | 70.5% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 23 | 9 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.9 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 43.6% | 5-16 | 33.0% | 18-23 | 78.9% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.0 | 37.6 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 6-18 | 35.2% | 14-20 | 67.3% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 26 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 87.2 | 41.3 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 6-16 | 35.6% | 20-25 | 79.0% | 43 | 8 | 19 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.3 | 39.9 | 29-66 | 43.5% | 5-16 | 31.8% | 19-23 | 79.1% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 89.2 | 41.2 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 4-14 | 30.0% | 23-28 | 81.3% | 45 | 10 | 19 | 19 | 9 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 4-9 | -1.3 | 5-8 | 8-5 | 80.0 | 38.8 | 45.3% | 38.1 | 84.4 | 42.5 | 46.1% | 39.6 | | Home Games | 2-4 | -2 | 3-3 | 5-1 | 83.8 | 42.2 | 45.9% | 39.2 | 84.3 | 44.3 | 47.0% | 39.7 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.3 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 79.8 | 39.4 | 43.7% | 35.8 | 85.2 | 38.8 | 46.7% | 42.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.0 | 38.8 | 28-62 | 45.3% | 6-20 | 32.0% | 18-22 | 82.6% | 38 | 7 | 17 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.1 | 40.5 | 29-66 | 44.3% | 5-16 | 32.4% | 18-23 | 79.2% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 83.8 | 42.2 | 29-64 | 45.9% | 7-20 | 35.2% | 18-22 | 81.5% | 39 | 8 | 18 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 84.4 | 42.5 | 31-68 | 46.1% | 5-15 | 34.5% | 17-21 | 81.7% | 40 | 9 | 16 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.6 | 40.7 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 5-17 | 32.2% | 18-23 | 79.3% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 84.3 | 44.3 | 33-70 | 47.0% | 5-14 | 36.9% | 13-16 | 81.8% | 40 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 7 | 12 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 71.1, SEATTLE 72.2 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/19/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 72-68 | W | -165 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 41 | 11 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 44 | 15 | | 5/21/2016 | WASHINGTON | 76-84 | L | -250 | 27-78 | 34.6% | 53 | 16 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 48 | 20 | | 5/26/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 72-77 | L | +450 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 44 | 12 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 44 | 17 | | 5/28/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 81-93 | L | +180 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 31 | 13 | 32-57 | 56.1% | 44 | 18 | | 5/31/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 90-99 | L | +550 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 48 | 19 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 35 | 4 | | 6/3/2016 | ATLANTA | 77-83 | L | +250 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 50 | 18 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 47 | 16 | | 6/5/2016 | INDIANA | 77-88 | L | +200 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 40 | 16 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 38 | 13 | | 6/10/2016 | SEATTLE | 77-76 | W | +135 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 46 | 12 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 40 | 12 | | 6/12/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 87-93 | L | +280 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 43 | 11 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 46 | 13 | | 6/14/2016 | WASHINGTON | 106-109 | L | +135 | 39-86 | 45.3% | 55 | 19 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 42 | 18 | | 6/16/2016 | NEW YORK | 72-80 | L | +250 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 30 | 16 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 45 | 17 | | 6/19/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 93-90 | W | -210 | 36-73 | 49.3% | 43 | 10 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 32 | 13 | | 6/24/2016 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/26/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2016 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2016 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2016 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2016 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/15/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 66-96 | L | +350 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 39 | 24 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 26 | 10 | | 5/20/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 81-80 | W | +500 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 48 | 16 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 37 | 12 | | 5/22/2016 | MINNESOTA | 71-78 | L | +350 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 42 | 15 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 11 | | 5/26/2016 | WASHINGTON | 82-84 | L | -200 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 35 | 11 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 49 | 16 | | 5/28/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 93-81 | W | -220 | 32-57 | 56.1% | 44 | 18 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 31 | 13 | | 6/1/2016 | @ INDIANA | 75-85 | L | +210 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 27 | 20 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 37 | 14 | | 6/3/2016 | PHOENIX | 95-81 | W | +200 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 43 | 10 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 32 | 12 | | 6/5/2016 | NEW YORK | 78-86 | L | +105 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 38 | 7 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 46 | 10 | | 6/10/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 76-77 | L | -155 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 40 | 12 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 46 | 12 | | 6/12/2016 | @ INDIANA | 90-88 | W | +200 | 28-53 | 52.8% | 34 | 16 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 37 | 14 | | 6/14/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 70-77 | L | -175 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 41 | 11 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 50 | 13 | | 6/16/2016 | @ DALLAS | 79-88 | L | +180 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 31 | 19 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 44 | 17 | | 6/19/2016 | MINNESOTA | 84-96 | L | +450 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 33 | 14 | 41-73 | 56.2% | 37 | 10 | | 6/24/2016 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2016 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2016 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2016 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2016 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2016 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| SEATTLE is 15-19 (-1.3 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 5-1 (+5.0 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| SEATTLE is 11-6 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 2-1 (+1.7 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/10/2016 | SEATTLE | 76 | -3 | Under | 38 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 8-9 | 88.9% | 40 | 5 | 12 | | | CONNECTICUT | 77 | 162 | SU ATS | 28 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 19-24 | 79.2% | 46 | 12 | 12 | 5/28/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 81 | 152.5 | Over | 37 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 31 | 11 | 13 | | | SEATTLE | 93 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 32-57 | 56.1% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 23-29 | 79.3% | 44 | 12 | 18 | 7/31/2015 | SEATTLE | 66 | 148 | ATS | 40 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 40 | 6 | 15 | | | CONNECTICUT | 67 | -7 | SU Under | 38 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 14-22 | 63.6% | 47 | 6 | 16 | 6/16/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 79 | 140.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 39 | 9 | 12 | | | SEATTLE | 58 | -2.5 | Under | 30 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 36 | 4 | 22 |
|
| | |
|
Boucek is 4-11 against the money line (-9.6 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.4, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 5-11 against the money line (-8.7 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 3-10 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after playing a game as a home underdog as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Boucek is 5-15 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.2, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Boucek is 2-13 against the money line (-12.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.5, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
|
Miller is 3-10 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 3-10 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 2-9 against the money line (-8.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 88.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 21-11 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 79.7, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 15-5 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 78.6, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 135 times, while the road underdog won straight up 62 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 13 times, while the road underdog won straight up 9 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [F] 06/23/2016 - Alyssa Thomas "?" Friday vs. Seattle Storm ( Concussion ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/18/2024 3:58:42 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|