| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
First Half Results
SEATTLE |
|
|
82
| 37
Final
56 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 657 | CONNECTICUT | 81 | | 658 | SEATTLE | -3.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a win by 6 points or less.
(119-74 since 1997.) (61.7%, +37.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, off a home loss.
(174-114 since 1997.) (60.4%, +48.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(67-32 since 1997.) (67.7%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a win by 6 points or less.
(57-24 since 1997.) (70.4%, +30.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(118-69 since 1997.) (63.1%, +42.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (SEATTLE) - after 3 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(51-24 since 1997.) (68%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a home loss by 10 points or more.
(38-14 since 1997.) (73.1%, +22.6 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(152-93 since 1997.) (62%, +49.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(88-46 since 1997.) (65.7%, +37.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(86-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +44.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(61-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.5%, +36.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(53-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.7%, +28.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(42-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +28.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite.
(66-33 since 1997.) (66.7%, +29.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite, in June games.
(26-6 since 1997.) (81.2%, +19.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite, in May, June, or July games.
(40-15 since 1997.) (72.7%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(47-20 since 1997.) (70.1%, +25 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(53-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(152-93 since 1997.) (62%, +49.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season.
(35-12 since 1997.) (74.5%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season.
(32-9 since 1997.) (78%, +22.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - after having lost 4 of their last 5 games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record.
(69-34 since 1997.) (67%, +31.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CONNECTICUT) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(112-65 since 1997.) (63.3%, +40.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(69-35 since 1997.) (66.3%, +30.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games.
(105-65 since 1997.) (61.8%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(100-57 since 1997.) (63.7%, +37.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(70-37 since 1997.) (65.4%, +29.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after a division game against opponent after a non-conference game.
(401-296 since 1997.) (57.5%, +75.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after 2 consecutive division games against opponent after a non-conference game.
(256-181 since 1997.) (58.6%, +56.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(508-361 since 1997.) (58.5%, +110.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(370-252 since 1997.) (59.5%, +92.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(846-626 since 1997.) (57.5%, +157.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(609-434 since 1997.) (58.4%, +131.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(311-219 since 1997.) (58.7%, +70.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent.
(667-481 since 1997.) (58.1%, +137.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(174-110 since 1997.) (61.3%, +53 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game.
(804-621 since 1997.) (56.4%, +120.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in May, June, or July games.
(500-368 since 1997.) (57.6%, +95.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(864-642 since 1997.) (57.4%, +157.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(539-401 since 1997.) (57.3%, +97.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after a non-conference game.
(658-503 since 1997.) (56.7%, +104.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(508-361 since 1997.) (58.5%, +110.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 75 | | 38 | | 30-69 | 42.9% | 5-18 | 29.1% | 11-15 | 71.3% | 40 | 11 | 14 | | SEATTLE | 81 | | 41 | | 29-61 | 46.9% | 6-17 | 33.9% | 18-21 | 84.1% | 41 | 8 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT covered the first half line 513 times, while SEATTLE covered the first half line 487 times.
No Edge. | In 1000 simulated games, 552 games went under first half total, while 414 games went over first half total.
Edge against first half total=Under |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) in road games when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.6, OPPONENT 35.0 | CONNECTICUT is 64-42 against the 1rst half line (+17.8 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.9, OPPONENT 35.6 | CONNECTICUT is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.8, OPPONENT 35.5 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 7-24 against the 1rst half line (-19.4 Units) in road games when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.7, OPPONENT 37.0 | CONNECTICUT is 56-125 against the 1rst half line (-81.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 42.0 | SEATTLE is 55-24 against the 1rst half line (+28.6 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.5, OPPONENT 34.5 | SEATTLE is 131-56 against the 1rst half line (+69.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 41.1, OPPONENT 36.0 |
|
SEATTLE is 144-94 UNDER (+40.6 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they attempt 57 to 63 shots since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.2, OPPONENT 34.7 | SEATTLE is 108-52 UNDER (+50.8 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.8, OPPONENT 34.1 | SEATTLE is 82-53 UNDER (+23.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.2, OPPONENT 35.2 | SEATTLE is 111-73 UNDER (+30.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.0, OPPONENT 34.9 | SEATTLE is 74-50 UNDER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.2, OPPONENT 34.3 | SEATTLE is 126-92 UNDER (+24.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.7, OPPONENT 34.8 | SEATTLE is 155-104 UNDER (+40.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.3, OPPONENT 34.1 | SEATTLE is 175-108 UNDER (+56.2 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.7, OPPONENT 34.4 | SEATTLE is 138-100 UNDER (+28.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 35.2 | SEATTLE is 90-61 UNDER (+22.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.2, OPPONENT 35.1 | SEATTLE is 193-116 UNDER (+65.4 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.3, OPPONENT 34.3 |
|
| | | | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.6, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 21-40 against the 1rst half line (-23.0 Units) when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.7, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-17 against the 1rst half line (-10.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.4, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 33-58 against the 1rst half line (-30.8 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.2, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 40.5, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 24-13 OVER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.9, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 22-12 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.6, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 19-8 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.0, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 19-8 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.1, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 118-89 UNDER (+20.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.1, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-7 UNDER (+12.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.2, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 37-19 UNDER (+16.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a terrible team (Win Pct. <=25%) since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.9, OPPONENT 31.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 148-92 UNDER (+46.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.1, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 96-68 UNDER (+21.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.6, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 131-95 UNDER (+26.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 188-137 UNDER (+37.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.3, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 91-46 UNDER (+40.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.3, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 74-46 UNDER (+23.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.0, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 41-23 UNDER (+15.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.7, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 80-42 UNDER (+33.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.5, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) in road games against Western conference opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.7, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-5 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.6, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-5 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.7, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) in road games in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.7, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.4, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-5 against the 1rst half line (+9.5 Units) in road games after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.2, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 9-19 against the 1rst half line (-11.9 Units) after 2 consecutive division games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 2-13 against the 1rst half line (-12.3 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.7, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 7-17 against the 1rst half line (-11.7 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.6, OPPONENT 43.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.8, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 10-19 against the 1rst half line (-10.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.5, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.2, OPPONENT 43.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 8-20 against the 1rst half line (-14.0 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.4, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 9-19 against the 1rst half line (-11.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.1, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 0-8 against the 1rst half line (-8.8 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.6, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) in June games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.8, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.5, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.8, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-44 against the 1rst half line (-24.4 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.7, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-32 against the 1rst half line (-18.2 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.3, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.8, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.8, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-16 against the 1rst half line (-13.6 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-10 against the 1rst half line (-10.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.4, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-25 against the 1rst half line (-15.5 Units) in road games after a win by 6 points or less since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.4, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 49-79 against the 1rst half line (-37.9 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.3, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 55-81 against the 1rst half line (-34.1 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.8, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 74-104 against the 1rst half line (-40.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.9, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 18-7 against the 1rst half line (+10.3 Units) after failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.4, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 73-49 against the 1rst half line (+19.1 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.5, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 38-16 against the 1rst half line (+20.4 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 32.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 29-18 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.7, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-9 OVER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.4, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-8 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-10 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.6, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-15 OVER (+13.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.3, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-5 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.3, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-10 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.3, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-8 OVER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.4, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.2, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.6, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 18-8 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.7, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 17-8 OVER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.6, OPPONENT 43.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.6, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 20-10 OVER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.5, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 41.3, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.8, OPPONENT 31.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.6, OPPONENT 31.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.4, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 331-242 UNDER (+64.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.7, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 158-113 UNDER (+33.7 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.6, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 55-36 UNDER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3.5 to 7 vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.8, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 47-24 UNDER (+20.6 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3.5 to 5 points vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.9, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 110-65 UNDER (+38.5 Units) the 1rst half total in June games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 223-154 UNDER (+53.6 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.4, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 209-148 UNDER (+46.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.5, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 148-96 UNDER (+42.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.3, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 52-27 UNDER (+22.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.4, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.7, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 152-113 UNDER (+27.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.5, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 66-45 UNDER (+16.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.2, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 22-10 UNDER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where opponent was called for 22 or more fouls since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.6, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 78-55 UNDER (+17.5 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.6, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 103-70 UNDER (+26.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.3, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 51-32 UNDER (+15.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.9, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 130-97 UNDER (+23.3 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 86-61 UNDER (+18.9 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.4, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 173-108 UNDER (+54.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.4, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 99-63 UNDER (+29.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.5, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 37-18 UNDER (+17.2 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 32.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 161-113 UNDER (+36.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.7, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 3-10 | -8.2 | 6-6 | 7-6 | 80.8 | 37.9 | 42.8% | 43.6 | 87.2 | 41.3 | 47.0% | 43.1 | | Road Games | 1-4 | -3 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 80.0 | 37.6 | 43.5% | 41.2 | 89.2 | 41.2 | 47.0% | 44.8 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.6 | 2-2 | 3-2 | 87.0 | 38.4 | 45.7% | 43.4 | 89.6 | 42.8 | 47.6% | 41.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.8 | 37.9 | 30-71 | 42.8% | 5-18 | 30.1% | 15-21 | 70.5% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 23 | 9 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.9 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 43.6% | 5-16 | 33.0% | 18-23 | 78.9% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.0 | 37.6 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 6-18 | 35.2% | 14-20 | 67.3% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 26 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 87.2 | 41.3 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 6-16 | 35.6% | 20-25 | 79.0% | 43 | 8 | 19 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.3 | 39.9 | 29-66 | 43.5% | 5-16 | 31.8% | 19-23 | 79.1% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 89.2 | 41.2 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 4-14 | 30.0% | 23-28 | 81.3% | 45 | 10 | 19 | 19 | 9 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 4-9 | -1.3 | 5-8 | 8-5 | 80.0 | 38.8 | 45.3% | 38.1 | 84.4 | 42.5 | 46.1% | 39.6 | | Home Games | 2-4 | -2 | 3-3 | 5-1 | 83.8 | 42.2 | 45.9% | 39.2 | 84.3 | 44.3 | 47.0% | 39.7 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.3 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 79.8 | 39.4 | 43.7% | 35.8 | 85.2 | 38.8 | 46.7% | 42.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.0 | 38.8 | 28-62 | 45.3% | 6-20 | 32.0% | 18-22 | 82.6% | 38 | 7 | 17 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.1 | 40.5 | 29-66 | 44.3% | 5-16 | 32.4% | 18-23 | 79.2% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 83.8 | 42.2 | 29-64 | 45.9% | 7-20 | 35.2% | 18-22 | 81.5% | 39 | 8 | 18 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 84.4 | 42.5 | 31-68 | 46.1% | 5-15 | 34.5% | 17-21 | 81.7% | 40 | 9 | 16 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.6 | 40.7 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 5-17 | 32.2% | 18-23 | 79.3% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 84.3 | 44.3 | 33-70 | 47.0% | 5-14 | 36.9% | 13-16 | 81.8% | 40 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 7 | 12 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 71.1, SEATTLE 72.2 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/19/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 72-68 | 39-36 | -2 | W | 74.5 | O | 28-67 | 41.8% | 41 | 11 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 44 | 15 | | 5/21/2016 | WASHINGTON | 76-84 | 37-32 | -3 | W | 76.5 | U | 27-78 | 34.6% | 53 | 16 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 48 | 20 | | 5/26/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 72-77 | 43-41 | 6.5 | W | 78 | O | 26-70 | 37.1% | 44 | 12 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 44 | 17 | | 5/28/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 81-93 | 37-39 | 3 | W | 75 | O | 30-69 | 43.5% | 31 | 13 | 32-57 | 56.1% | 44 | 18 | | 5/31/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 90-99 | 46-40 | 7 | W | 81.5 | O | 34-67 | 50.7% | 48 | 19 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 35 | 4 | | 6/3/2016 | ATLANTA | 77-83 | 39-43 | 4 | T | 82.5 | U | 29-73 | 39.7% | 50 | 18 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 47 | 16 | | 6/5/2016 | INDIANA | 77-88 | 35-47 | 3 | L | 81.5 | O | 32-66 | 48.5% | 40 | 16 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 38 | 13 | | 6/10/2016 | SEATTLE | 77-76 | 28-38 | 1.5 | L | 80 | U | 27-69 | 39.1% | 46 | 12 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 40 | 12 | | 6/12/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 87-93 | 41-46 | 4.5 | L | 83 | O | 34-71 | 47.9% | 43 | 11 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 46 | 13 | | 6/14/2016 | WASHINGTON | 106-109 | 42-44 | 1.5 | L | 80.5 | O | 39-86 | 45.3% | 55 | 19 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 42 | 18 | | 6/16/2016 | NEW YORK | 72-80 | 36-41 | 4 | L | 80 | U | 28-60 | 46.7% | 30 | 16 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 45 | 17 | | 6/19/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 93-90 | 45-45 | -2.5 | L | 75.5 | O | 36-73 | 49.3% | 43 | 10 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 32 | 13 | | 6/24/2016 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/26/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2016 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2016 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2016 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2016 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/15/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 66-96 | 26-51 | 5.5 | L | 75 | O | 24-49 | 49.0% | 39 | 24 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 26 | 10 | | 5/20/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 81-80 | 37-43 | 6.5 | W | 81 | U | 26-65 | 40.0% | 48 | 16 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 37 | 12 | | 5/22/2016 | MINNESOTA | 71-78 | 41-46 | 5.5 | W | 78 | O | 28-66 | 42.4% | 42 | 15 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 11 | | 5/26/2016 | WASHINGTON | 82-84 | 33-40 | -2.5 | L | 75 | U | 29-70 | 41.4% | 35 | 11 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 49 | 16 | | 5/28/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 93-81 | 39-37 | -3 | L | 75 | O | 32-57 | 56.1% | 44 | 18 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 31 | 13 | | 6/1/2016 | @ INDIANA | 75-85 | 38-51 | 3.5 | L | 80.5 | O | 28-52 | 53.8% | 27 | 20 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 37 | 14 | | 6/3/2016 | PHOENIX | 95-81 | 49-44 | 3 | W | 83.5 | O | 32-63 | 50.8% | 43 | 10 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 32 | 12 | | 6/5/2016 | NEW YORK | 78-86 | 45-46 | 1 | T | 75 | O | 28-69 | 40.6% | 38 | 7 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 46 | 10 | | 6/10/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 76-77 | 38-28 | -1.5 | W | 80 | U | 30-68 | 44.1% | 40 | 12 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 46 | 12 | | 6/12/2016 | @ INDIANA | 90-88 | 42-36 | 3 | W | 80.5 | U | 28-53 | 52.8% | 34 | 16 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 37 | 14 | | 6/14/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 70-77 | 33-41 | -2 | L | 73 | O | 23-70 | 32.9% | 41 | 11 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 50 | 13 | | 6/16/2016 | @ DALLAS | 79-88 | 38-36 | 3 | W | 82.5 | U | 27-59 | 45.8% | 31 | 19 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 44 | 17 | | 6/19/2016 | MINNESOTA | 84-96 | 46-53 | 6.5 | L | 79 | O | 28-61 | 45.9% | 33 | 14 | 41-73 | 56.2% | 37 | 10 | | 6/24/2016 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2016 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2016 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2016 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2016 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2016 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CONNECTICUT is 17-16 versus the first half line when playing against SEATTLE since 1997 | | 16 of 32 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 4-2 versus the first half line when playing against SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 6 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| SEATTLE is 8-8 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT since 1997 | | 8 of 15 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 3-0 versus the first half line when playing against SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 3 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/10/2016 | SEATTLE | 76 | -3 | Under | 38 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 8-9 | 88.9% | 40 | 5 | 12 | | | CONNECTICUT | 77 | 162 | SU ATS | 28 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 19-24 | 79.2% | 46 | 12 | 12 | 5/28/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 81 | 152.5 | Over | 37 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 31 | 11 | 13 | | | SEATTLE | 93 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 32-57 | 56.1% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 23-29 | 79.3% | 44 | 12 | 18 | 7/31/2015 | SEATTLE | 66 | 148 | ATS | 40 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 40 | 6 | 15 | | | CONNECTICUT | 67 | -7 | SU Under | 38 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 14-22 | 63.6% | 47 | 6 | 16 | 6/16/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 79 | 140.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 39 | 9 | 12 | | | SEATTLE | 58 | -2.5 | Under | 30 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 36 | 4 | 22 |
|
| | |
|
Boucek is 17-32 against the 1rst half line (-18.2 Units) after 2 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 34.7, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 9-22 against the 1rst half line (-15.2 Units) after 3 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 34.3, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 7-17 against the 1rst half line (-11.7 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.6, OPPONENT 43.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 6-16 against the 1rst half line (-11.6 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 37.1, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 10-19 against the 1rst half line (-10.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.5, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.2, OPPONENT 43.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 0-8 against the 1rst half line (-8.8 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.6, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Miller is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) in June games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.8, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.8, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.8, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.8, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 40.5, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 37.8, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Boucek is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.6, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 18-8 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.7, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 17-8 OVER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.6, OPPONENT 43.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 13-3 OVER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 36.8, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.6, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 20-10 OVER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.5, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 41.3, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 24-13 OVER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.9, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 22-12 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.6, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 32-17 OVER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 38.5, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 19-8 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.0, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 19-8 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.1, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 103 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 89 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 14 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 7 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 4 games went over the first half total, while 3 games went under the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 3 games went over the first half total, while 1 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 9 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 3 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 1 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 0 times. | | Since 1997, 7 games went under the first half total, while 5 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 1 games went under the first half total, while 0 games went over the first half total. |
|
| | |
| [F] 06/23/2016 - Alyssa Thomas "?" Friday vs. Seattle Storm ( Concussion ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/18/2024 8:01:05 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|