| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES
First Half Results
MINNESOTA |
|
|
77.5
| 38
Final
36 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 655 | LOS ANGELES | 76 | | 656 | MINNESOTA | -2 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (LOS ANGELES) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(48-21 since 1997.) (69.6%, +24.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (LOS ANGELES) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(37-12 since 1997.) (75.5%, +23.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (LOS ANGELES) - a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record, in May, June, or July games.
(30-9 since 1997.) (76.9%, +20.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
 - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(144-86 since 1997.) (62.6%, +49.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - off a upset loss as a favorite, playing with 2 days rest.
(89-50 since 1997.) (64%, +34 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - off a close home loss by 3 points or less, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(48-19 since 1997.) (71.6%, +27.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, playing with 2 days rest.
(133-76 since 1997.) (63.6%, +49.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, playing with 2 days rest.
(257-172 since 1997.) (59.9%, +67.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, playing with 2 days rest.
(239-163 since 1997.) (59.5%, +59.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - off a road win by 3 points or less.
(43-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +22.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games against opponent after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(70-34 since 1997.) (67.3%, +32.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - after 5 or more consecutive wins, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(140-87 since 1997.) (61.7%, +44.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - after 6 or more consecutive wins, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(91-52 since 1997.) (63.6%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games against opponent after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(43-17 since 1997.) (71.7%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less.
(48-21 since 1997.) (69.6%, +24.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, off a home loss.
(174-114 since 1997.) (60.4%, +48.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win by 3 points or less.
(30-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - off a upset loss as a favorite, playing with 2 days rest.
(91-48 since 1997.) (65.5%, +38.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - off an upset loss as a home favorite, playing with 2 days rest.
(75-40 since 1997.) (65.2%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - off a close home loss by 3 points or less, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(50-20 since 1997.) (71.4%, +28 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by more than 18 points in their previous game.
(72-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +31.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by more than 18 points in their previous game, vs. division opponents.
(49-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +24.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - off a upset loss as a favorite, playing with 2 days rest.
(75-36 since 1997.) (67.6%, +35.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - off a home loss, playing with 2 days rest.
(105-55 since 1997.) (65.6%, +44.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - off a home loss, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(34-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.9%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - off a close home loss by 3 points or less, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(41-12 since 1997.) (77.4%, +27.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread, playing with 2 days rest.
(205-136 since 1997.) (60.1%, +55.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, playing with 2 days rest.
(105-56 since 1997.) (65.2%, +43.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, playing with 2 days rest.
(221-134 since 1997.) (62.3%, +73.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(75-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, off a home loss.
(307-215 since 1997.) (58.8%, +70.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, off a close home loss by 3 points or less.
(61-29 since 1997.) (67.8%, +29.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (LOS ANGELES) - off a close home loss by 3 points or less, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(31-9 since 1997.) (77.5%, +21.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(69-35 since 1997.) (66.3%, +30.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (LOS ANGELES) - off a close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival.
(39-14 since 1997.) (73.6%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in June games.
(43-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.2%, +19.9 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (MINNESOTA) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in June games.
(37-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +17.2 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season, in June games.
(40-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +22.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in May, June, or July games.
(283-200 since 1997.) (58.6%, +63 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in May, June, or July games.
(150-98 since 1997.) (60.5%, +42.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after a win by 6 points or less.
(40-12 since 1997.) (76.9%, +26.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game.
(88-52 since 1997.) (62.9%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(68-35 since 1997.) (66%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game.
(77-38 since 1997.) (67%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game.
(38-13 since 1997.) (74.5%, +23.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(438-319 since 1997.) (57.9%, +87.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(130-75 since 1997.) (63.4%, +47.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(289-197 since 1997.) (59.5%, +72.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(370-262 since 1997.) (58.5%, +81.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games.
(286-196 since 1997.) (59.3%, +70.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning record on the season.
(271-186 since 1997.) (59.3%, +66.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - with a winning record on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(407-282 since 1997.) (59.1%, +96.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team, in May, June, or July games.
(195-127 since 1997.) (60.6%, +55.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, in May, June, or July games.
(237-163 since 1997.) (59.2%, +57.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(430-312 since 1997.) (58%, +86.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins.
(258-173 since 1997.) (59.9%, +67.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(115-67 since 1997.) (63.2%, +41.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 5 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(39-15 since 1997.) (72.2%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents, playing with 2 days rest.
(243-159 since 1997.) (60.4%, +68.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents, off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals.
(130-82 since 1997.) (61.3%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(266-180 since 1997.) (59.6%, +68 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team, in May, June, or July games.
(186-121 since 1997.) (60.6%, +52.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| LOS ANGELES | 76 | | 38 | | 29-63 | 46.2% | 5-16 | 34.5% | 12-16 | 75.9% | 37 | 7 | 13 | | MINNESOTA | 78 | | 39 | | 30-67 | 44.4% | 4-13 | 29.5% | 14-18 | 81.2% | 44 | 12 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES covered the first half line 530 times, while MINNESOTA covered the first half line 433 times.
No Edge. | In 1000 simulated games, 522 games went over first half total, while 435 games went under first half total.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.3, OPPONENT 33.8 | MINNESOTA is 48-77 against the 1rst half line (-36.7 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.3, OPPONENT 38.7 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 11-24 against the 1rst half line (-15.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.6, OPPONENT 42.1 | MINNESOTA is 143-111 against the 1rst half line (+20.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.2, OPPONENT 38.6 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 24-10 OVER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.6, OPPONENT 42.1 | LOS ANGELES is 16-6 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.8, OPPONENT 38.9 | MINNESOTA is 21-5 OVER (+15.5 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.6, OPPONENT 40.6 | MINNESOTA is 34-20 OVER (+12.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.0, OPPONENT 39.7 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 16-2 UNDER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.3, OPPONENT 32.8 | LOS ANGELES is 125-86 UNDER (+30.4 Units) the 1rst half total in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 35.0 | LOS ANGELES is 91-66 UNDER (+18.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 70% to 76% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.1, OPPONENT 35.3 | LOS ANGELES is 198-148 UNDER (+35.2 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 34.8 | LOS ANGELES is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.4, OPPONENT 33.7 | LOS ANGELES is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.5, OPPONENT 32.5 | LOS ANGELES is 205-160 UNDER (+29.0 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 35.0 | MINNESOTA is 24-12 UNDER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.3, OPPONENT 35.5 | MINNESOTA is 85-54 UNDER (+25.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.4, OPPONENT 36.1 | MINNESOTA is 117-87 UNDER (+21.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.3, OPPONENT 36.2 | MINNESOTA is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.1, OPPONENT 33.3 | MINNESOTA is 77-46 UNDER (+26.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.3, OPPONENT 35.7 | MINNESOTA is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.4, OPPONENT 34.9 | MINNESOTA is 191-143 UNDER (+33.7 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.9, OPPONENT 35.9 | MINNESOTA is 134-94 UNDER (+30.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.0, OPPONENT 36.0 | MINNESOTA is 53-26 UNDER (+24.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.8, OPPONENT 33.6 | MINNESOTA is 181-126 UNDER (+42.4 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.9, OPPONENT 35.5 |
|
| | |
|
| LOS ANGELES | | | | MINNESOTA | -2.5 | |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.5, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 24-12 against the 1rst half line (+10.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.3, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 123-165 against the 1rst half line (-58.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.0, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 35-69 against the 1rst half line (-40.9 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.2, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 83-126 against the 1rst half line (-55.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.2, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 107-73 UNDER (+26.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 151-105 UNDER (+35.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.0, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-8 UNDER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.3, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 179-134 UNDER (+31.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.8, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 35-20 UNDER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 33.7, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 176-114 UNDER (+50.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.0, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 30-13 UNDER (+15.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 33.7, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.4, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 80-54 UNDER (+20.6 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.0, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 8-0 UNDER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.5, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 11-1 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.7, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 51-29 UNDER (+19.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.0, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 86-50 UNDER (+31.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.7, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.1, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 26-11 UNDER (+13.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.6, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 206-146 UNDER (+45.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.0, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 16-7 UNDER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.4, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 39-22 UNDER (+14.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.4, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 94-55 UNDER (+33.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.9, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 36-14 UNDER (+20.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 33.8, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 17-4 UNDER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total vs. top caliber teams - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 33.4, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 15-4 UNDER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.8, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.1, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.0, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.7, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) in road games on Friday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.8, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.2, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-2 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.8, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-5 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.1, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 48-72 against the 1rst half line (-31.2 Units) on Friday since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.2, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 35-54 against the 1rst half line (-24.4 Units) in home games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.1, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 13-38 against the 1rst half line (-28.8 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 32.7, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 29-56 against the 1rst half line (-32.6 Units) off an upset win as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 32.8, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 27-50 against the 1rst half line (-28.0 Units) off a road win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.7, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 87-121 against the 1rst half line (-46.1 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.2, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 20-43 against the 1rst half line (-27.3 Units) off an upset win as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 32.0, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 49-78 against the 1rst half line (-36.8 Units) off a road win since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.6, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 36-62 against the 1rst half line (-32.2 Units) after a win by 6 points or less since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.6, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 106-147 against the 1rst half line (-55.7 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 33.9, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 77-117 against the 1rst half line (-51.7 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 33.7, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 123-166 against the 1rst half line (-59.6 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.2, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 130-175 against the 1rst half line (-62.5 Units) after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.7, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 140-183 against the 1rst half line (-61.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.6, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 28-47 against the 1rst half line (-23.7 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.7, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 3-17 against the 1rst half line (-15.7 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.1, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 53-79 against the 1rst half line (-33.9 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.2, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 31-57 against the 1rst half line (-31.7 Units) in road games after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 33.2, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 24-48 against the 1rst half line (-28.8 Units) in road games after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 32.5, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-40 against the 1rst half line (-28.0 Units) in road games after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 32.4, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 20-9 against the 1rst half line (+10.1 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.9, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 30-19 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.6, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 197-147 UNDER (+35.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.3, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 168-121 UNDER (+34.9 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.9, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total on Friday over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 84-60 UNDER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing with 2 days rest since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 250-199 UNDER (+31.1 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-9 UNDER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.2, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-5 UNDER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.9, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-7 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.5, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 33.4, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 60-34 UNDER (+22.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.3, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 48-25 UNDER (+20.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 33.6, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 89-59 UNDER (+24.1 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.6, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 141-104 UNDER (+26.6 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.2, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 77-54 UNDER (+17.6 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 of their last 5 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.2, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 118-82 UNDER (+27.8 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.9, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 102-61 UNDER (+34.9 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.2, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 75-49 UNDER (+21.1 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.9, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 118-88 UNDER (+21.2 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.0, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-7 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games off a home loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.7, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 101-71 UNDER (+22.9 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.7, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 73-50 UNDER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a upset loss as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 23-10 UNDER (+12.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 44-26 UNDER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.7, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 250-198 UNDER (+32.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 183-145 UNDER (+23.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 75-46 UNDER (+24.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.4, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 115-80 UNDER (+27.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.2, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 94-67 UNDER (+20.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.4, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 196-147 UNDER (+34.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 100-72 UNDER (+20.8 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.2, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 151-117 UNDER (+22.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 349-263 UNDER (+59.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.1, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.7, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 76-47 UNDER (+24.3 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.9, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.7, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.7, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 19-8 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 70.5 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.1, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 102-70 UNDER (+25.0 Units) the 1rst half total in June games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.2, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.5, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 76-45 UNDER (+26.5 Units) the 1rst half total on Friday since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.2, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing with 2 days rest over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.7, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 230-159 UNDER (+55.1 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 12-2 UNDER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.4, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 143-99 UNDER (+34.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.6, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 97-69 UNDER (+21.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.2, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 20-9 UNDER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.7, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.3, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.3, OPPONENT 30.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 13-3 UNDER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.2, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.2, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 9-1 UNDER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.8, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 44-27 UNDER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.7, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 56-34 UNDER (+18.6 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.0, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.8, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 54-28 UNDER (+23.2 Units) the 1rst half total off an upset win as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 32.8, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games off a road win against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.0, OPPONENT 31.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 10-1 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games off a win against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.3, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 22-7 UNDER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.8, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 43-17 UNDER (+24.3 Units) the 1rst half total off an upset win as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 32.0, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 18-7 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win by 3 points or less since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 33.1, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 13-5 UNDER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.4, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 18-5 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total off 2 or more consecutive road wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.0, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a close win by 3 points or less since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.0, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 10-0 UNDER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a win by 6 points or less over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.9, OPPONENT 31.9 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.1, OPPONENT 31.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.5, OPPONENT 31.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 147-98 UNDER (+39.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 33.9, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 118-69 UNDER (+42.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 33.7, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 20-8 UNDER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.0, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 72-45 UNDER (+22.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.3, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.0, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 92-51 UNDER (+35.9 Units) the 1rst half total after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.2, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 45-21 UNDER (+21.9 Units) the 1rst half total after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.2, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 14-2 UNDER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.2, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 10-1 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.8, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 3 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.0, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 9-1 UNDER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 4 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.8, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 5 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.7, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.1, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 11-1 | +8.4 | 8-4 | 6-6 | 85.4 | 43.0 | 49.0% | 38.1 | 71.4 | 33.9 | 41.4% | 42.7 | | Road Games | 6-0 | +6 | 5-1 | 3-3 | 86.2 | 42.3 | 48.1% | 40.8 | 70.8 | 33.5 | 40.5% | 43.8 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2.4 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 88.2 | 45.2 | 51.8% | 36.4 | 75.6 | 36.2 | 42.5% | 40.4 | | Division Games | 5-1 | +2.4 | 3-3 | 2-4 | 80.2 | 41.3 | 48.4% | 35.2 | 67.3 | 31.5 | 40.2% | 42.3 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 85.4 | 43.0 | 32-66 | 49.0% | 6-16 | 37.8% | 15-19 | 76.5% | 38 | 7 | 21 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.7 | 40.9 | 29-68 | 43.1% | 6-17 | 32.0% | 19-23 | 79.7% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 86.2 | 42.3 | 32-66 | 48.1% | 6-16 | 38.4% | 16-20 | 79.2% | 41 | 6 | 21 | 17 | 10 | 12 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.4 | 33.9 | 27-65 | 41.4% | 4-15 | 25.1% | 14-19 | 74.3% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.1 | 40.5 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 5-16 | 32.9% | 17-22 | 79.2% | 44 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 70.8 | 33.5 | 27-67 | 40.5% | 4-14 | 27.9% | 12-19 | 67.0% | 44 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 13-0 | +12.4 | 9-4 | 6-7 | 86.5 | 45.2 | 48.1% | 41.7 | 73.8 | 38.0 | 41.1% | 39.4 | | Home Games | 5-0 | +4 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 85.0 | 43.8 | 47.1% | 41.2 | 70.8 | 33.4 | 40.3% | 41.4 | | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +4.4 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 89.6 | 46.2 | 50.3% | 42.6 | 74.0 | 41.6 | 39.0% | 38.6 | | Division Games | 7-0 | +7.4 | 5-2 | 3-4 | 85.0 | 43.6 | 46.4% | 42.0 | 74.6 | 39.0 | 43.4% | 37.9 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 86.5 | 45.2 | 33-68 | 48.1% | 5-14 | 33.5% | 16-19 | 83.8% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 19 | 10 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 84 | 41.5 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 6-16 | 33.6% | 18-23 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 85.0 | 43.8 | 33-69 | 47.1% | 5-15 | 32.4% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 41 | 9 | 22 | 17 | 10 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.8 | 38.0 | 27-65 | 41.1% | 5-17 | 26.0% | 16-20 | 79.5% | 39 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 7 | 16 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 83.1 | 40.9 | 29-67 | 43.9% | 5-17 | 32.1% | 19-24 | 80.7% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 70.8 | 33.4 | 27-66 | 40.3% | 4-19 | 22.7% | 13-17 | 78.6% | 41 | 8 | 15 | 21 | 8 | 15 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 71.2, MINNESOTA 72 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/15/2016 | SEATTLE | 96-66 | 51-26 | -5.5 | W | 75 | O | 36-66 | 54.5% | 26 | 10 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 39 | 24 | | 5/20/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 97-67 | 43-31 | -4 | W | 78 | U | 37-66 | 56.1% | 36 | 11 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 41 | 21 | | 5/21/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 79-72 | 34-34 | -1 | L | 78 | U | 31-88 | 35.2% | 57 | 11 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 61 | 15 | | 5/24/2016 | @ CHICAGO | 93-80 | 53-35 | -1.5 | W | 82 | O | 30-65 | 46.2% | 37 | 8 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 40 | 15 | | 5/26/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 77-72 | 41-43 | -6.5 | L | 78 | O | 29-57 | 50.9% | 44 | 17 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 44 | 12 | | 6/2/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 68-61 | 35-31 | -9.5 | L | 74.5 | U | 23-53 | 43.4% | 39 | 15 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 43 | 13 | | 6/4/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 74-61 | 33-26 | -6 | W | 72.5 | U | 27-58 | 46.6% | 36 | 8 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 43 | 8 | | 6/7/2016 | NEW YORK | 100-77 | 51-38 | -4 | W | 74.5 | O | 41-74 | 55.4% | 41 | 9 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 37 | 17 | | 6/11/2016 | @ DALLAS | 97-73 | 50-32 | -5 | W | 81 | O | 38-65 | 58.5% | 35 | 19 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 34 | 21 | | 6/14/2016 | CHICAGO | 98-85 | 46-37 | -4.5 | W | 83.5 | U | 39-67 | 58.2% | 31 | 6 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 36 | 9 | | 6/17/2016 | PHOENIX | 77-71 | 40-36 | -6 | L | 83.5 | U | 31-68 | 45.6% | 36 | 8 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 44 | 15 | | 6/21/2016 | MINNESOTA | 69-72 | 39-38 | -1.5 | L | 80.5 | U | 24-60 | 40.0% | 39 | 17 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 51 | 14 | | 6/24/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/26/2016 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2016 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2016 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2016 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2016 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2016 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/18/2016 | @ CHICAGO | 97-80 | 46-40 | -2 | W | 81 | O | 36-70 | 51.4% | 41 | 9 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 41 | 12 | | 5/22/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 78-71 | 46-41 | -5.5 | L | 78 | O | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 11 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 42 | 15 | | 5/25/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 85-78 | 48-38 | -2 | W | 81.5 | O | 29-62 | 46.8% | 40 | 21 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 30 | 19 | | 5/27/2016 | INDIANA | 74-71 | 50-27 | -7 | W | 82 | U | 30-64 | 46.9% | 41 | 14 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 44 | 14 | | 5/31/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 79-69 | 46-31 | -3 | W | 75.5 | O | 32-65 | 49.2% | 41 | 13 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 41 | 19 | | 6/4/2016 | DALLAS | 80-63 | 36-29 | -7 | T | 81 | U | 34-70 | 48.6% | 42 | 13 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 45 | 18 | | 6/7/2016 | PHOENIX | 89-81 | 32-38 | -6 | L | 82.5 | U | 27-73 | 37.0% | 37 | 9 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 46 | 12 | | 6/10/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 110-78 | 46-45 | -4 | L | 81.5 | O | 38-69 | 55.1% | 37 | 10 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 47 | 18 | | 6/11/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 83-76 | 45-47 | -4 | L | 78.5 | O | 29-59 | 49.2% | 46 | 19 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 32 | 13 | | 6/14/2016 | INDIANA | 87-63 | 49-31 | -8 | W | 81 | U | 32-65 | 49.2% | 42 | 11 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 42 | 12 | | 6/19/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 96-84 | 53-46 | -6.5 | W | 79 | O | 41-73 | 56.2% | 37 | 10 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 33 | 14 | | 6/21/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 72-69 | 38-39 | 1.5 | W | 80.5 | U | 29-70 | 41.4% | 51 | 14 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 39 | 17 | | 6/24/2016 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/26/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2016 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2016 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/9/2016 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| MINNESOTA is 40-32 versus the first half line when playing against LOS ANGELES since 1997 | | 40 of 71 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 8-4 versus the first half line when playing against LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons | | 7 of 12 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| MINNESOTA is 23-13 versus the first half line when playing against LOS ANGELES since 1997 | | 18 of 35 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 5-1 versus the first half line when playing against LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 6 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/21/2016 | MINNESOTA | 72 | 163 | SU ATS | 38 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 51 | 12 | 14 | | | LOS ANGELES | 69 | -3 | Under | 39 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 16-24 | 66.7% | 39 | 5 | 17 | 9/22/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 80 | 146 | Over | 30 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 33 | 7 | 13 | | | MINNESOTA | 91 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 1-7 | 14.3% | 30-36 | 83.3% | 49 | 16 | 10 | 9/20/2015 | MINNESOTA | 71 | 145.5 | Over | 35 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 35 | 8 | 16 | | | LOS ANGELES | 81 | -3 | SU ATS | 53 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 9-18 | 50.0% | 12-20 | 60.0% | 46 | 11 | 10 | 9/18/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 65 | 146.5 | ATS | 36 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 38 | 8 | 14 | | | MINNESOTA | 67 | -5.5 | SU Under | 33 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 36 | 6 | 11 | 8/9/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 64 | 149.5 | Under | 32 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 39 | 9 | 16 | | | MINNESOTA | 72 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 37 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 1-10 | 10.0% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 43 | 10 | 9 | 8/4/2015 | MINNESOTA | 61 | -2 | Under | 35 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 6-7 | 85.7% | 37 | 4 | 15 | | | LOS ANGELES | 83 | 152.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 37-77 | 48.1% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 7-8 | 87.5% | 42 | 9 | 7 | 7/29/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 76 | 148 | ATS | 35 | 31-55 | 56.4% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 7-8 | 87.5% | 32 | 2 | 21 | | | MINNESOTA | 82 | -8.5 | SU Over | 43 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 18-24 | 75.0% | 31 | 6 | 12 | 6/16/2015 | MINNESOTA | 67 | -11.5 | SU ATS | 23 | 30-57 | 52.6% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 4-7 | 57.1% | 31 | 4 | 8 | | | LOS ANGELES | 52 | 144.5 | Under | 28 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 3-18 | 16.7% | 1-4 | 25.0% | 39 | 9 | 11 |
|
| | |
|
Agler is 26-13 against the 1rst half line (+11.7 Units) in road games on Friday in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.0, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) after a division game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.2, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.8, OPPONENT 31.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 11-2 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.8, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 39-21 against the 1rst half line (+15.9 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.2, OPPONENT 32.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 29-13 against the 1rst half line (+14.7 Units) off an upset loss as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.4, OPPONENT 31.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 45-23 against the 1rst half line (+19.7 Units) off a home loss in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.1, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 59-38 against the 1rst half line (+17.2 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.7, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 16-5 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.1, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.5, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 24-12 against the 1rst half line (+10.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.3, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 37-53 against the 1rst half line (-21.3 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.8, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 64-79 against the 1rst half line (-22.9 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.2, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 11-23 against the 1rst half line (-14.3 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.1, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 64-78 against the 1rst half line (-21.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.3, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 56-69 against the 1rst half line (-19.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.2, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 40-58 against the 1rst half line (-23.8 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.4, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 50-65 against the 1rst half line (-21.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.7, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 85-100 against the 1rst half line (-25.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.4, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 18-31 against the 1rst half line (-16.1 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.1, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 47-67 against the 1rst half line (-26.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.8, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Agler is 8-20 against the 1rst half line (-14.0 Units) in road games after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 32.8, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 13-26 against the 1rst half line (-15.6 Units) in road games versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 31.4, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 20-9 against the 1rst half line (+10.1 Units) as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.3, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 75-56 against the 1rst half line (+13.4 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.8, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 88-72 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.0, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 24-14 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) in home games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Reeve is 132-120 OVER (+0.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.7, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Agler is 30-19 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.6, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 129-69 UNDER (+53.1 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 32.5, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 103-52 UNDER (+45.8 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 32.2, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 68-30 UNDER (+35.0 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 32.8, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 46-15 UNDER (+29.5 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 32.2, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 135-69 UNDER (+59.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 32.9, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 92-56 UNDER (+30.4 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.1, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 81-37 UNDER (+40.3 Units) the 1rst half total in June games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.5, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 171-91 UNDER (+70.9 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.1, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total on Friday as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 168-97 UNDER (+61.3 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.5, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 20-9 UNDER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.2, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 109-60 UNDER (+43.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.1, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 75-41 UNDER (+29.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.0, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 128-85 UNDER (+34.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.0, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 13-5 UNDER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.9, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 17-7 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.5, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 39-21 UNDER (+15.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 2 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 32.2, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 33.4, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 84-50 UNDER (+29.0 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.5, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 58-34 UNDER (+20.6 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.4, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 62-28 UNDER (+31.2 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 75-40 UNDER (+31.0 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.1, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 35-19 UNDER (+14.1 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 of their last 5 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.2, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 51-25 UNDER (+23.5 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.1, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 23-9 UNDER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 32.0, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 30-14 UNDER (+14.6 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 33.4, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 48-24 UNDER (+21.6 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a home loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 33.1, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 114-72 UNDER (+34.8 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.3, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 83-50 UNDER (+28.0 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.4, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 24-6 UNDER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.2, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 18-3 UNDER (+14.7 Units) the 1rst half total off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.8, OPPONENT 31.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 32-11 UNDER (+19.9 Units) the 1rst half total off a home loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 33.8, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 83-35 UNDER (+44.5 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 33.5, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 44-14 UNDER (+28.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a upset loss as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.2, OPPONENT 32.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 32-9 UNDER (+22.1 Units) the 1rst half total off an upset loss as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.4, OPPONENT 31.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 48-20 UNDER (+26.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a home loss in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.1, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 89-40 UNDER (+45.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.5, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 41-15 UNDER (+24.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a loss by 6 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 33.2, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 136-73 UNDER (+55.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.6, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 72-42 UNDER (+25.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.8, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 42-21 UNDER (+18.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.7, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 101-60 UNDER (+35.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.2, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 46-16 UNDER (+28.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.6, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 15-2 UNDER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive games as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 32.4, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 125-77 UNDER (+40.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.9, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 67-31 UNDER (+32.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive home games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.6, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 26-12 UNDER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive home games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.5, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 133-68 UNDER (+58.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.5, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 61-35 UNDER (+22.5 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.7, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 127-56 UNDER (+65.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.1, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 118-68 UNDER (+43.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 33.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 120-77 UNDER (+35.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.5, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 89-58 UNDER (+25.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.1, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 158-105 UNDER (+42.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.1, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 117-74 UNDER (+35.6 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.6, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 50-26 UNDER (+21.4 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.8, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 135-82 UNDER (+44.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.2, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 203-111 UNDER (+80.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.4, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 18-8 UNDER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.3, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 72-41 UNDER (+26.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.1, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 33-17 UNDER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 33.7, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 149-93 UNDER (+46.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.8, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 103-67 UNDER (+29.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.6, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 48-25 UNDER (+20.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.5, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 82-51 UNDER (+25.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.6, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 68-53 UNDER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.9, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 73-55 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 73-55 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 52-39 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 70.5 as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.6, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 20-6 UNDER (+13.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.5, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 50-31 UNDER (+15.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.0, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 46-30 UNDER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a division game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.7, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 35-19 UNDER (+14.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.4, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 49-35 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.6, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 41-27 UNDER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.3, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 18-2 UNDER (+15.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.8, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 6*) | Reeve is 45-28 UNDER (+14.2 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.4, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 53-39 UNDER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.9, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 29-16 UNDER (+11.4 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.4, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 36-24 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.8, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 31-14 UNDER (+15.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.6, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 35-15 UNDER (+18.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games off a win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.1, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 17-7 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.7, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total off an upset win as a road underdog as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.8, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 48-24 UNDER (+21.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.9, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total off 2 or more consecutive road wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.7, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 27-16 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a win by 6 points or less as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.4, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 53-36 UNDER (+13.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.5, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 43-29 UNDER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.2, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 35-24 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.4, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 71-47 UNDER (+19.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.9, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 52-30 UNDER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 69-56 UNDER (+7.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.2, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 52-37 UNDER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.1, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 19-10 UNDER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 4 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.6, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 16-7 UNDER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 5 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.1, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 29-16 UNDER (+11.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.3, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 40-25 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.8, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 39-23 UNDER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.2, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 47-26 UNDER (+18.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.7, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 32-16 UNDER (+14.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.2, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 44-29 UNDER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.8, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 58-36 UNDER (+18.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.3, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 49-28 UNDER (+18.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.8, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 45-31 UNDER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.9, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 62-42 UNDER (+15.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.2, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 55-31 UNDER (+20.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.1, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 39-20 UNDER (+17.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.8, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.0, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 42-16 UNDER (+24.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.9, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 112 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 105 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 16 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 14 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 7 games went under the first half total, while 5 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 2 games went over the first half total, while 1 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 7 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 6 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 1 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 1 times. | | Since 1997, 9 games went under the first half total, while 4 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 1 games went over the first half total, while 1 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [F] 06/23/2016 - Maya Moore injured last game, "?" Friday vs. LA Sparks ( Thigh ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/5/2024 8:52:34 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|