| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO NEW YORK |
|
| 161.5 | 79 Final 80 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
653 | CHICAGO | +145 | 654 | NEW YORK | -165 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - off a road win by 10 points or more, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (44-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +30.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (120-83 since 1997.) (59.1%, +33.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (35-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +22.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (71-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.7%, +40.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (57-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.8%, +24.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (32-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.2%, +23.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (88-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (294-287 since 1997.) (50.6%, +80.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (193-188 since 1997.) (50.7%, +62.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (139-78 since 1997.) (64.1%, +42.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (78-71 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.3%, +29.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (98-72 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.6%, +45.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (68-57 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.4%, +27.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (58-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.2%, +29.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (53-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.9%, +32.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (26-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.1%, +29.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (34-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.7%, +25.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO | 79 | | 32-72 | 44.1% | 4-12 | 35.9% | 12-14 | 82.0% | 44 | 10 | 11 | NEW YORK | 80 | | 29-70 | 42.0% | 5-13 | 34.7% | 17-22 | 76.7% | 46 | 12 | 11 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, NEW YORK won the game straight up 517 times, while CHICAGO won 465 times. Edge against the money line=CHICAGO |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CHICAGO is 34-17 against the money line (+15.5 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 88.3, OPPONENT 82.5 | NEW YORK is 65-89 against the money line (-35.6 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 68.9, OPPONENT 71.5 | NEW YORK is 1-6 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in home games when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 68.7, OPPONENT 80.3 | NEW YORK is 6-13 against the money line (-16.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 77.3, OPPONENT 82.4 |
|
CHICAGO is 12-23 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 82.7 | CHICAGO is 43-59 against the money line (-28.4 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 76.8 | CHICAGO is 3-11 against the money line (-11.3 Units) in road games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 83.1 | CHICAGO is 29-56 against the money line (-35.9 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 72.1, OPPONENT 74.9 | CHICAGO is 22-53 against the money line (-40.5 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 78.1 | CHICAGO is 24-43 against the money line (-28.7 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 79.1 | CHICAGO is 9-18 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in road games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 82.9 | CHICAGO is 20-47 against the money line (-31.2 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 80.3 | CHICAGO is 2-7 against the money line (-9.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 89.6 | CHICAGO is 2-7 against the money line (-9.4 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers this season. The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 88.0 | CHICAGO is 3-7 against the money line (-8.4 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 86.6 | CHICAGO is 0-5 against the money line (-8.3 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 86.2 | NEW YORK is 24-7 against the money line (+14.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 79.4, OPPONENT 72.9 | NEW YORK is 13-6 against the money line (+9.8 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 76.8, OPPONENT 74.2 | NEW YORK is 77-55 against the money line (+28.7 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.6, OPPONENT 70.8 | NEW YORK is 107-95 against the money line (+28.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 81.0, OPPONENT 80.8 | NEW YORK is 13-2 against the money line (+10.4 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 79.5, OPPONENT 72.7 | NEW YORK is 26-3 against the money line (+22.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 83.2, OPPONENT 73.7 | NEW YORK is 17-4 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 81.0, OPPONENT 74.0 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 91.3, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 17-24 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 20-51 against the money line (-36.1 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.5, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 49-60 against the money line (-33.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 60-73 against the money line (-30.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 94-140 against the money line (-50.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 51-98 against the money line (-37.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 24-10 against the money line (+11.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 76.6, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 11-2 against the money line (+10.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 77.1, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 22-9 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 74.6, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 28-13 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 76.3, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 8-1 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 74.3, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 84.4, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 79-49 against the money line (+34.2 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 70.7, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 11-1 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 3-14 against the money line (-16.6 Units) after a game with 55 or more rebounds since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 73.9, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 29-41 against the money line (-31.7 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 67.9, OPPONENT 68.8 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 157-200 against the money line (-59.3 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-12.2 Units) in road games after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 99-125 against the money line (-48.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-7 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 77-124 against the money line (-62.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 56-93 against the money line (-48.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 25-31 against the money line (-20.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 50-78 against the money line (-36.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 32-47 against the money line (-25.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 48-67 against the money line (-36.5 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 27-43 against the money line (-26.2 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-11 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.8, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 50-66 against the money line (-33.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 33-48 against the money line (-28.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-24 against the money line (-22.9 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 16-19 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-9 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-19 against the money line (-14.2 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 72.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-18 against the money line (-19.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.3, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 5-10 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.6, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-9.2 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 14-18 against the money line (-18.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 11-18 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-23 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 69-88 against the money line (-36.5 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 47-69 against the money line (-33.2 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 64-103 against the money line (-49.2 Units) after playing a home game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-5 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.9, OPPONENT 88.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 34-41 against the money line (-23.2 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-16 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-12 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 35-18 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 76.3, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in June games this season. The average score was NEW YORK 85.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 21-10 against the money line (+10.4 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 76.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 22-12 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 73.9, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 7-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after 3 straight games with 45 or more rebounds over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 77.5, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 23-14 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 75.9, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 65-59 against the money line (+23.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 74.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 33-26 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 76.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 127-109 against the money line (+28.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.8, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 48-37 against the money line (+17.5 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 75.2, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 65-43 against the money line (+16.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 73.4, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 45-23 against the money line (+21.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 74.7, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 31-13 against the money line (+15.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 75.8, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 25-10 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 77.8, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 24-10 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 76.1, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 42-21 against the money line (+17.0 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.5, OPPONENT 68.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 183-142 against the money line (+41.4 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.5, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 8-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 79.6, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 37-23 against the money line (+17.3 Units) after playing 3 consecutive road games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.7, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 6-7 | -6.4 | 5-8 | 8-5 | 84.9 | 44.5 | 46.8% | 45.3 | 83.6 | 39.7 | 41.5% | 40.6 | Road Games | 3-5 | -6.4 | 3-5 | 5-3 | 84.0 | 45.5 | 46.8% | 45.4 | 85.0 | 40.5 | 41.0% | 41.2 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -3.1 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 83.2 | 43.0 | 45.2% | 44.8 | 84.8 | 40.4 | 42.9% | 42.6 | Division Games | 4-2 | -0.1 | 4-2 | 3-3 | 88.0 | 47.8 | 46.1% | 49.5 | 78.7 | 37.2 | 38.8% | 42.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 84.9 | 44.5 | 34-72 | 46.8% | 3-10 | 32.8% | 15-17 | 83.6% | 45 | 10 | 20 | 21 | 6 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.1 | 40.2 | 30-67 | 44.0% | 5-16 | 32.4% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 44 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 84.0 | 45.5 | 33-71 | 46.8% | 4-11 | 37.4% | 13-16 | 82.5% | 45 | 10 | 20 | 22 | 5 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 83.6 | 39.7 | 28-68 | 41.5% | 6-20 | 32.2% | 21-26 | 80.1% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 82.3 | 40.2 | 29-67 | 43.5% | 5-17 | 32.0% | 18-24 | 78.2% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 85.0 | 40.5 | 28-69 | 41.0% | 6-20 | 31.7% | 22-26 | 81.6% | 41 | 10 | 16 | 16 | 8 | 9 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 9-4 | +2.7 | 7-5 | 7-6 | 82.2 | 40.8 | 43.6% | 49.5 | 78.2 | 40.3 | 38.7% | 43.6 | Home Games | 3-3 | -2.3 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 80.2 | 40.5 | 41.8% | 50.0 | 76.8 | 37.5 | 37.0% | 47.0 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +5 | 3-1 | 3-2 | 85.8 | 42.8 | 45.0% | 53.2 | 77.8 | 41.6 | 37.9% | 40.2 | Division Games | 5-1 | +1.7 | 4-1 | 3-3 | 84.2 | 40.0 | 44.4% | 51.5 | 74.3 | 36.8 | 35.3% | 43.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 82.2 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 43.6% | 4-12 | 37.1% | 18-24 | 75.4% | 50 | 10 | 20 | 22 | 7 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.1 | 40.2 | 30-67 | 44.5% | 5-15 | 32.1% | 18-23 | 77.9% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.2 | 40.5 | 29-70 | 41.8% | 5-12 | 43.1% | 17-23 | 73.0% | 50 | 10 | 18 | 21 | 8 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.2 | 40.3 | 27-71 | 38.7% | 6-21 | 26.8% | 18-23 | 77.5% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 21 | 10 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 82.4 | 40.4 | 29-67 | 43.4% | 6-17 | 31.7% | 18-23 | 78.2% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 76.8 | 37.5 | 27-72 | 37.0% | 6-22 | 27.7% | 17-22 | 78.9% | 47 | 10 | 14 | 20 | 10 | 12 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 71.2, NEW YORK 70.4 |
| | |
|
|
5/18/2016 | MINNESOTA | 80-97 | L | +145 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 41 | 12 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 41 | 9 | 5/22/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 81-87 | L | -200 | 29-77 | 37.7% | 60 | 13 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 44 | 5 | 5/24/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 80-93 | L | +135 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 40 | 15 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 37 | 8 | 5/27/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 78-79 | L | -330 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 50 | 15 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 33 | 11 | 5/29/2016 | @ DALLAS | 92-87 | W | -120 | 41-70 | 58.6% | 39 | 13 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 43 | 12 | 6/1/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 86-78 | W | -175 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 35 | 12 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 42 | 13 | 6/3/2016 | WASHINGTON | 98-72 | W | -600 | 39-71 | 54.9% | 45 | 11 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 32 | 14 | 6/10/2016 | @ INDIANA | 73-64 | W | -120 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 51 | 14 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 41 | 9 | 6/12/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 80-86 | L | +120 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 41 | 13 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 46 | 11 | 6/14/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 85-98 | L | +280 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 36 | 9 | 39-67 | 58.2% | 31 | 6 | 6/17/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 97-101 | L | -210 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 51 | 11 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 50 | 9 | 6/21/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 81-75 | W | | 30-73 | 41.1% | 45 | 13 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 45 | 16 | 6/24/2016 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2016 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2016 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2016 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2016 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/15/2016 | DALLAS | 79-71 | W | -270 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 46 | 16 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 42 | 11 | 5/21/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 72-79 | L | +100 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 61 | 15 | 31-88 | 35.2% | 57 | 11 | 5/24/2016 | ATLANTA | 79-85 | L | -330 | 32-89 | 36.0% | 56 | 15 | 23-76 | 30.3% | 68 | 16 | 5/31/2016 | MINNESOTA | 69-79 | L | +200 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 41 | 19 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 41 | 13 | 6/3/2016 | INDIANA | 91-59 | W | -210 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 51 | 12 | 20-61 | 32.8% | 32 | 12 | 6/5/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 86-78 | W | -125 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 46 | 10 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 38 | 7 | 6/7/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 77-100 | L | +250 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 37 | 17 | 41-74 | 55.4% | 41 | 9 | 6/11/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 90-75 | W | -330 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 59 | 12 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 47 | 10 | 6/14/2016 | DALLAS | 91-88 | W | -360 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 45 | 12 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 42 | 12 | 6/16/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 80-72 | W | -330 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 45 | 17 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 30 | 16 | 6/19/2016 | @ INDIANA | 78-75 | W | -155 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 56 | 21 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 36 | 14 | 6/22/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 90-79 | W | -140 | 35-77 | 45.5% | 61 | 18 | 28-84 | 33.3% | 46 | 11 | 6/24/2016 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/26/2016 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2016 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2016 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2016 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
NEW YORK is 20-20 (+0.4 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 5-3 (+1.7 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CHICAGO is 9-11 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 3-1 (+3.9 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/3/2015 | CHICAGO | 82 | 152 | SU ATS | 46 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 9-15 | 60.0% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 45 | 10 | 9 | | NEW YORK | 60 | -6.5 | Under | 27 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 0-7 | 0.0% | 14-21 | 66.7% | 44 | 11 | 11 | 8/11/2015 | CHICAGO | 63 | 152.5 | Under | 36 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 2-8 | 25.0% | 3-5 | 60.0% | 35 | 8 | 17 | | NEW YORK | 84 | -7 | SU ATS | 45 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 12-14 | 85.7% | 42 | 7 | 14 | 8/7/2015 | NEW YORK | 77 | 158.5 | SU ATS | 42 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 17-24 | 70.8% | 52 | 6 | 14 | | CHICAGO | 63 | -4.5 | Under | 32 | 20-67 | 29.9% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 21-24 | 87.5% | 43 | 5 | 13 | 6/30/2015 | NEW YORK | 89 | 152 | SU ATS | 48 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 9-19 | 47.4% | 20-22 | 90.9% | 45 | 9 | 12 | | CHICAGO | 81 | -5.5 | Over | 36 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 20-23 | 87.0% | 39 | 9 | 8 |
|
| | |
|
Chatman is 21-13 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 80.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 17-33 against the money line (-20.4 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 70.5, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 3-8 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after a game with 55 or more rebounds as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 75.5, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 33-22 against the money line (-27.1 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 74.6, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 4-6 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in home games after 5 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 70.1, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 33-36 against the money line (-26.0 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 75.3, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Chatman is 97-97 against the money line (-28.6 Units) in all games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 23-26 against the money line (-16.3 Units) in June games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 80.6, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 55-55 against the money line (-19.5 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 29-38 against the money line (-21.6 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 60-68 against the money line (-35.8 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 23-36 against the money line (-15.6 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 21-36 against the money line (-15.5 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 48-58 against the money line (-31.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 32-45 against the money line (-28.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 51-59 against the money line (-34.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 30-36 against the money line (-20.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 16-22 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 20-35 against the money line (-21.3 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 14-26 against the money line (-16.1 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 9-21 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 73.5, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 32-36 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 23-37 against the money line (-17.7 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 15-24 against the money line (-17.0 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 8-15 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 73.7, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 33-45 against the money line (-32.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 10-16 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 2-8 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.1, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 42-51 against the money line (-27.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 19-26 against the money line (-20.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 41-49 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 48-50 against the money line (-20.5 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 27-28 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 19-23 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 12-18 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 37-57 against the money line (-36.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 8-24 against the money line (-21.2 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Chatman is 74-79 against the money line (-28.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 38-36 against the money line (-18.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 69-70 against the money line (-21.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 33-37 against the money line (-21.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 55-67 against the money line (-22.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 31-53 against the money line (-24.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 30-23 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 74.4, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 44-27 against the money line (+17.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 74.8, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 26-15 against the money line (+12.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 74.6, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 10-2 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 74.6, OPPONENT 68.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 94-60 against the money line (+33.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 74.5, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 21-13 against the money line (+14.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 75.2, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 39-22 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 75.1, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 39-16 against the money line (+19.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 75.1, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 49-35 against the money line (+19.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 75.7, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 34-27 against the money line (+17.3 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 73.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 18-13 against the money line (+9.6 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 72.9, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 61-34 against the money line (+22.5 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 74.0, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 231 times, while the road underdog won straight up 158 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog won the game straight up 18 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 14 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 06/08/2016 - Betnijah Laney out for season ( Knee ) | |
[G] 05/14/2016 - Epiphanny Prince out indefinitely ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/3/2024 8:24:33 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|