| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES MINNESOTA |
|
| 148 | 76 Final 82 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
605 | LOS ANGELES | +300 | 606 | MINNESOTA | -400 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (305-112 since 1997.) (73.1%, +92.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (269-74 since 1997.) (78.4%, +85.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG). (265-94 since 1997.) (73.8%, +84.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG). (247-98 since 1997.) (71.6%, +78.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games. (191-120 since 1997.) (61.4%, +55 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG). (137-48 since 1997.) (74.1%, +54.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (115-28 since 1997.) (80.4%, +53.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (126-47 since 1997.) (72.8%, +48.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a home loss, a terrible team (<=25%) playing a team with a winning record. (85-18 since 1997.) (82.5%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 115 points or less. (77-36 since 1997.) (68.1%, +42.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a home loss, a terrible team (<=25%) playing a team with a winning record. (88-22 since 1997.) (80%, +42.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off an embarrassing home loss scoring less than 54 points. (84-37 since 1997.) (69.4%, +42.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an good defensive team (38-40.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (93-46 since 1997.) (66.9%, +40.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 55 points or less. (72-28 since 1997.) (72%, +35.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 115 points or less. (45-9 since 1997.) (83.3%, +33.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - average defensive team (65-72 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more. (69-30 since 1997.) (69.7%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off an embarrassing home loss scoring less than 54 points, with a losing record. (49-14 since 1997.) (77.8%, +31.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 55 points or less. (41-8 since 1997.) (83.7%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - average defensive team (65-72 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (58-26 since 1997.) (69%, +27.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better against opponent after a game where a team made 15% of their 3 point shots or worse. (57-30 since 1997.) (65.5%, +27.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off an embarrassing home loss scoring less than 54 points, with a losing record. (28-1 since 1997.) (96.6%, +26.6 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off an embarrassing home loss scoring less than 54 points, with a losing record. (29-2 since 1997.) (93.5%, +26.5 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a home loss versus opponent, off an embarrassing home loss scoring less than 54 points. (30-6 since 1997.) (83.3%, +22.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 115 points or less. (37-13 since 1997.) (74%, +21.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off an embarrassing home loss scoring less than 54 points, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (31-9 since 1997.) (77.5%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against a poor team (-3 to -7 PPG differential), after allowing 75 points or more. (25-5 since 1997.) (83.3%, +18.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (75-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (45-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.4%, +16.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (54-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (54-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (54-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws. (276-261 since 1997.) (51.4%, +74.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games. (191-120 since 1997.) (61.4%, +55 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games. (75-77 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.3%, +31.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games. (83-72 since 1997.) (53.5%, +41.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after a loss by 6 points or less. (33-19 since 1997.) (63.5%, +38.5 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after a loss by 6 points or less. (26-18 since 1997.) (59.1%, +33 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a close home loss by 3 points or less, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (24-10 since 1997.) (70.6%, +24.9 units. Rating = 4*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES | 67 | | 27-65 | 40.9% | 5-16 | 30.7% | 9-11 | 83.9% | 38 | 7 | 13 | MINNESOTA | 82 | | 31-66 | 46.8% | 4-12 | 35.2% | 15-18 | 84.0% | 44 | 8 | 10 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 855 times, while LOS ANGELES won 130 times. Edge against the money line=MINNESOTA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 57-75 against the money line (-45.2 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.6, OPPONENT 74.2 | MINNESOTA is 90-94 against the money line (-41.1 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.4, OPPONENT 74.0 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 7-19 against the money line (-18.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 81.8 | LOS ANGELES is 37-69 against the money line (-83.6 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 79.6 | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-18.7 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 79.9 | LOS ANGELES is 34-45 against the money line (-24.8 Units) when they attempt 11 or less free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.7, OPPONENT 69.2 | LOS ANGELES is 0-6 against the money line (-7.2 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 67.8, OPPONENT 76.7 | LOS ANGELES is 1-10 against the money line (-10.4 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.5, OPPONENT 78.8 | LOS ANGELES is 29-53 against the money line (-47.6 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 80.0 | LOS ANGELES is 5-20 against the money line (-23.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 88.0 | LOS ANGELES is 2-11 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.1, OPPONENT 77.4 | LOS ANGELES is 2-9 against the money line (-8.6 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 65.6, OPPONENT 72.8 | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-11.3 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.9, OPPONENT 75.2 | LOS ANGELES is 5-10 against the money line (-15.8 Units) when they score 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 68.7, OPPONENT 72.7 | LOS ANGELES is 7-14 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 79.2 | MINNESOTA is 29-2 against the money line (+23.2 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 70.5 | MINNESOTA is 10-2 against the money line (+8.3 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 76.5 | MINNESOTA is 84-40 against the money line (+50.2 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.0, OPPONENT 71.7 | MINNESOTA is 30-7 against the money line (+16.2 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 75.6 | MINNESOTA is 17-3 against the money line (+12.5 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.3, OPPONENT 72.7 | MINNESOTA is 89-39 against the money line (+46.3 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.5, OPPONENT 72.7 | MINNESOTA is 26-7 against the money line (+15.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.1, OPPONENT 80.0 | MINNESOTA is 39-12 against the money line (+18.4 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 73.6 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 66-51 against the money line (+18.1 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.6, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 49-33 against the money line (+17.6 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 32-24 against the money line (+19.5 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.9, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 19-19 against the money line (-31.1 Units) when playing against a terrible team (Win Pct. <=25%) since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.6, OPPONENT 67.7 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 8-9 against the money line (-17.9 Units) when playing against a terrible team (Win Pct. <=25%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.1, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 62-47 against the money line (-34.1 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.9, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 17-15 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus terrible teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.4, OPPONENT 66.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 31-23 against the money line (-27.9 Units) versus terrible teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.5, OPPONENT 67.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 15-23 against the money line (-20.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-13 against the money line (-18.4 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-28 against the money line (-17.2 Units) when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-10 against the money line (-10.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-17 against the money line (-19.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-12 against the money line (-20.3 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-12 against the money line (-9.4 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-13 against the money line (-11.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-26 against the money line (-24.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-13 against the money line (-10.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.3, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-22 against the money line (-19.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-10 against the money line (-11.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.2, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-15 against the money line (-18.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.3, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 7*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-22 against the money line (-16.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 25-22 against the money line (-30.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-10 against the money line (-8.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-14 against the money line (-12.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-21 against the money line (-17.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-15 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-39 against the money line (-22.0 Units) in road games versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-34 against the money line (-24.2 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-13 against the money line (-11.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-25 against the money line (-23.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-10 against the money line (-8.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-16 against the money line (-13.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-10 against the money line (-13.8 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.1, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-15 against the money line (-14.8 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-22 against the money line (-17.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 33-6 against the money line (+17.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.7, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 30-9 against the money line (+16.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 45-17 against the money line (+17.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 29-8 against the money line (+16.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 42-13 against the money line (+19.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 17-5 against the money line (+11.6 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 24-9 against the money line (+11.2 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 37-10 against the money line (+21.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 53-19 against the money line (+20.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 23-7 against the money line (+13.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 35-10 against the money line (+19.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 49-18 against the money line (+19.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 75-96 against the money line (-57.4 Units) in July games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 186-192 against the money line (-71.3 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.9, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 46-40 against the money line (-32.8 Units) in home games after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.9, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 63-50 against the money line (-34.0 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.3, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 9-12 against the money line (-17.5 Units) in home games after a close loss by 3 points or less since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.5, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 25-24 against the money line (-22.1 Units) in home games after a loss by 6 points or less since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.4, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 116-146 against the money line (-57.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.0, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 3-13 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in all games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-24 against the money line (-17.3 Units) in road games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-23 against the money line (-16.3 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-13 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-13 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in May, June, or July games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 0-4 against the money line (-7.8 Units) on Wednesday over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 60.3, OPPONENT 65.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-14 against the money line (-30.2 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-22 against the money line (-16.0 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-11 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-10.3 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-17 against the money line (-17.2 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-18 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-7 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-17 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-11 against the money line (-10.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 0-7 against the money line (-8.9 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.0, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-14 against the money line (-10.6 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 24-44 against the money line (-21.7 Units) after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-12 against the money line (-11.6 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-24 against the money line (-15.1 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-20 against the money line (-17.8 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-15 against the money line (-13.1 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.1, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-19 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-11 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-16 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.5, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-9.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-25 against the money line (-23.5 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-10 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 68.3, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 65-21 against the money line (+20.2 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 63-13 against the money line (+25.8 Units) as a favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 34-4 against the money line (+21.3 Units) as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 34-4 against the money line (+21.3 Units) in home games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 34-4 against the money line (+21.3 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 43-14 against the money line (+17.4 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 23-7 against the money line (+13.9 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 43-13 against the money line (+23.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 7-1 against the money line (+6.3 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.9, OPPONENT 68.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 33-11 against the money line (+16.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 27-6 against the money line (+16.2 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.2, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 10-1 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 28-16 against the money line (+14.9 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 57-18 against the money line (+19.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 45-11 against the money line (+24.9 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 39-10 against the money line (+22.1 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 32-10 against the money line (+15.1 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 19-5 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.5, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 3-13 | -11.6 | 4-12 | 8-8 | 70.1 | 35.6 | 42.5% | 39.5 | 76.4 | 34.6 | 43.5% | 39.9 | Road Games | 0-7 | -8.3 | 2-5 | 4-3 | 68.3 | 35.0 | 41.0% | 41.1 | 78.4 | 35.9 | 43.2% | 40.4 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.6 | 1-4 | 0-5 | 64.6 | 33.0 | 42.0% | 39.6 | 70.0 | 35.2 | 37.2% | 41.2 | Division Games | 3-7 | -5 | 2-8 | 4-6 | 70.3 | 36.4 | 43.0% | 39.2 | 76.8 | 35.1 | 46.3% | 37.3 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.1 | 35.6 | 26-62 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 30.7% | 13-15 | 83.8% | 39 | 7 | 17 | 19 | 4 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 74.5 | 37.6 | 28-66 | 42.0% | 5-15 | 32.3% | 15-18 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 68.3 | 35.0 | 26-63 | 41.0% | 5-16 | 32.4% | 11-13 | 86.0% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 19 | 4 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.4 | 34.6 | 28-63 | 43.5% | 5-14 | 32.7% | 16-22 | 75.6% | 40 | 8 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 74.1 | 36.7 | 27-65 | 41.7% | 5-15 | 32.6% | 15-19 | 78.8% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.4 | 35.9 | 28-64 | 43.2% | 5-15 | 32.0% | 18-24 | 75.4% | 40 | 8 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 12-4 | -1.2 | 9-7 | 6-10 | 77.7 | 36.7 | 45.6% | 41.9 | 69.5 | 35.0 | 39.6% | 38.9 | Home Games | 6-2 | -1.9 | 5-3 | 3-5 | 79.4 | 37.2 | 45.6% | 44.0 | 67.1 | 32.7 | 37.2% | 39.9 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | -0.6 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 78.2 | 34.8 | 44.0% | 43.0 | 68.8 | 33.8 | 38.0% | 43.2 | Division Games | 9-2 | +1.1 | 7-4 | 3-8 | 76.0 | 36.7 | 46.8% | 40.9 | 66.4 | 35.1 | 38.1% | 37.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.7 | 36.7 | 30-66 | 45.6% | 4-12 | 35.3% | 14-16 | 84.2% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 16 | 7 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 76.4 | 38 | 28-66 | 43.1% | 5-15 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 79.4 | 37.2 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 5-12 | 41.0% | 12-15 | 84.0% | 44 | 10 | 19 | 16 | 6 | 13 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.5 | 35.0 | 26-66 | 39.6% | 6-18 | 31.8% | 11-14 | 82.0% | 39 | 8 | 16 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 75.6 | 37.8 | 28-66 | 42.1% | 5-16 | 33.1% | 15-18 | 80.0% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 67.1 | 32.7 | 25-69 | 37.2% | 5-17 | 29.3% | 11-12 | 88.0% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 16 | 6 | 12 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 70.3, MINNESOTA 70.2 |
| | |
|
|
6/21/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 68-76 | L | +155 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 37 | 16 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 40 | 8 | 6/23/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 80-84 | L | +450 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 43 | 17 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 32 | 9 | 6/26/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 76-80 | L | +220 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 44 | 19 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 50 | 12 | 6/28/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 70-79 | L | +145 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 39 | 10 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 39 | 9 | 7/2/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 86-81 | W | -250 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 31 | 10 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 34 | 14 | 7/3/2015 | TULSA | 98-95 | W | -220 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 41 | 9 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 40 | 10 | 7/5/2015 | PHOENIX | 91-94 | L | +145 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 42 | 8 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 38 | 4 | 7/8/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 63-70 | L | -175 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 39 | 11 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 45 | 11 | 7/11/2015 | @ TULSA | 67-82 | L | +175 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 42 | 13 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 41 | 5 | 7/15/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 61-68 | L | -155 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 41 | 21 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 31 | 11 | 7/16/2015 | ATLANTA | 72-76 | L | -140 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 38 | 16 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 42 | 15 | 7/21/2015 | PHOENIX | 70-65 | W | +155 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 38 | 10 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 30 | 7 | 7/22/2015 | NEW YORK | 53-59 | L | -120 | 20-63 | 31.7% | 39 | 12 | 17-66 | 25.8% | 62 | 13 | 7/29/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2015 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/19/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 74-59 | W | -330 | 31-56 | 55.4% | 37 | 15 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 31 | 15 | 6/21/2015 | TULSA | 78-86 | L | -330 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 32 | 16 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 44 | 11 | 6/25/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 76-73 | W | -600 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 40 | 14 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 36 | 17 | 6/27/2015 | PHOENIX | 71-56 | W | -270 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 40 | 12 | 19-57 | 33.3% | 42 | 20 | 7/3/2015 | SEATTLE | 82-57 | W | -950 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 42 | 13 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 28 | 12 | 7/10/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 83-90 | L | -165 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 41 | 9 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 40 | 10 | 7/12/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 66-49 | W | | 29-70 | 41.4% | 44 | 10 | 20-69 | 29.0% | 49 | 13 | 7/14/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 85-79 | W | -270 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 34 | 15 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 14 | 7/17/2015 | CHICAGO | 84-66 | W | -210 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 46 | 10 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 47 | 12 | 7/19/2015 | @ TULSA | 79-72 | W | -155 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 41 | 11 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 38 | 13 | 7/22/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 77-78 | L | -360 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 50 | 16 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 42 | 15 | 7/29/2015 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2015 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/1/2015 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2015 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2015 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES is 41-25 (+11.8 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
MINNESOTA is 6-4 (-0.2 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
LOS ANGELES is 16-16 (+3.0 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
MINNESOTA is 3-1 (-0.6 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/16/2015 | MINNESOTA | 67 | -11.5 | SU ATS | 23 | 30-57 | 52.6% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 4-7 | 57.1% | 31 | 4 | 8 | | LOS ANGELES | 52 | 144.5 | Under | 28 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 3-18 | 16.7% | 1-4 | 25.0% | 39 | 9 | 11 | 8/12/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 71 | 158.5 | SU ATS | 29 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 5-18 | 27.8% | 8-9 | 88.9% | 40 | 5 | 7 | | MINNESOTA | 63 | -8 | Under | 36 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 7-9 | 77.8% | 36 | 5 | 10 | 7/8/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 72 | 163 | Under | 42 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 12-17 | 70.6% | 49 | 20 | 8 | | MINNESOTA | 83 | -4 | SU ATS | 48 | 33-61 | 54.1% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 14-15 | 93.3% | 38 | 1 | 8 | 6/17/2014 | MINNESOTA | 94 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 53 | 37-58 | 63.8% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 35 | 6 | 13 | | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 158 | Over | 42 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 2-8 | 25.0% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 35 | 15 | 12 | 6/8/2014 | MINNESOTA | 85 | 164 | SU ATS | 42 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 19-25 | 76.0% | 50 | 11 | 14 | | LOS ANGELES | 72 | -3.5 | Under | 37 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 41 | 11 | 16 |
|
| | |
|
Brian is 73-56 against the money line (+24.4 Units) after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 72.2, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 108-84 against the money line (+33.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 73.0, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 90-67 against the money line (+23.9 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 73.0, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 25-13 against the money line (+16.9 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 73.9, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 38-34 against the money line (+17.7 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 69.3, OPPONENT 68.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 84-69 against the money line (+18.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 73.2, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 127-110 against the money line (+27.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 73.5, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 34-29 against the money line (+16.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 76.5, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 84-74 against the money line (+25.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 74.3, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 8-10 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after a game with 16 or more offensive rebounds as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.3, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 2-6 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in home games after a close loss by 3 points or less as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 4-7 against the money line (-15.5 Units) in home games after a loss by 6 points or less as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Brian is 3-13 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in all games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 3-13 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 13-21 against the money line (-23.8 Units) on Wednesday in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 68.6, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 5-22 against the money line (-16.4 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 66.4, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 19-39 against the money line (-24.9 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 67.9, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 22-35 against the money line (-28.5 Units) after 3 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 69.9, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 3-13 against the money line (-19.7 Units) in road games after 4 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 68.7, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 6*) | Brian is 22-40 against the money line (-21.4 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 68.0, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 0-7 against the money line (-8.9 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.0, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 6-15 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after a game being outrebounded by opponent by 15 or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 69.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 9-16 against the money line (-13.1 Units) in road games off a upset loss as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 68.8, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 23-30 against the money line (-19.9 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 66.9, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 9-20 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after scoring 55 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 63.6, OPPONENT 67.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 5-15 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after a combined score of 115 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 62.9, OPPONENT 68.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 23-41 against the money line (-23.9 Units) after a combined score of 125 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 65.8, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 2-10 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 68.3, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 2-18 against the money line (-15.6 Units) when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 65.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 3-10 against the money line (-8.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 10-32 against the money line (-21.4 Units) versus good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of <=40% in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 65.2, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 15-27 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 68.3, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 11-27 against the money line (-20.5 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 71.4, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 133-61 against the money line (+28.5 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 111-35 against the money line (+19.9 Units) as a favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 68-16 against the money line (+23.6 Units) as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 72-19 against the money line (+26.4 Units) in home games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 72-19 against the money line (+26.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 86-39 against the money line (+23.5 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 44-17 against the money line (+23.0 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 82-37 against the money line (+21.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 48-20 against the money line (+16.4 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 56-21 against the money line (+15.2 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 52-17 against the money line (+21.5 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 67-29 against the money line (+15.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.1, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 98-45 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 31-6 against the money line (+15.6 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 19-4 against the money line (+15.8 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 5*) | Cheryl is 74-31 against the money line (+17.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 106-39 against the money line (+33.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 86-30 against the money line (+20.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 74-22 against the money line (+28.1 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 65-16 against the money line (+30.7 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 52-16 against the money line (+17.0 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 66-26 against the money line (+21.6 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 69-30 against the money line (+21.3 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 51-25 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 60-21 against the money line (+18.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 39-21 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 69-31 against the money line (+22.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 92-48 against the money line (+19.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 58-26 against the money line (+16.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 79-32 against the money line (+27.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 106-50 against the money line (+23.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 35-15 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 73-30 against the money line (+28.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 96-47 against the money line (+21.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 122 times, while the road underdog won straight up 32 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 17 times, while the road underdog won straight up 4 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[F] 07/28/2015 - Candace Parker is upgraded to probable Wednesday vs. Min Lynx ( Personal ) | [G] 06/16/2015 - Alana Beard out indefinitely ( Foot ) | |
[C] 07/28/2015 - Sylvia Fowles has been acquired from the Chicago Sky and is probable Wednesday vs. LA Sparks ( Acquired ) | [G] 07/27/2015 - Lindsay Whalen is upgraded to probable Wednesday vs. LA Sparks ( Eye ) | [G] 07/18/2015 - Seimone Augustus expected to miss a month ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/11/2024 7:58:23 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|