| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
NEW YORK
INDIANA |
|
|
149
| 72
Final
84 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 603 | NEW YORK | -105 | | 604 | INDIANA | -115 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - vs. division opponents, playing on back-to-back days.
(186-63 since 1997.) (74.7%, +69.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(194-68 since 1997.) (74%, +65.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(170-52 since 1997.) (76.6%, +64.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after playing a road game, playing on back-to-back days.
(182-67 since 1997.) (73.1%, +61.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after playing a road game, playing on back-to-back days.
(165-80 since 1997.) (67.3%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Underdogs vs the money line (NEW YORK) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(139-51 since 1997.) (73.2%, +46.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, playing on back-to-back days.
(90-30 since 1997.) (75%, +44.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 115 points or less.
(77-36 since 1997.) (68.1%, +42.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a win against a division rival, playing on back-to-back days.
(99-39 since 1997.) (71.7%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a road win, playing on back-to-back days.
(87-32 since 1997.) (73.1%, +38.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, playing on back-to-back days.
(60-16 since 1997.) (78.9%, +34.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 115 points or less.
(45-9 since 1997.) (83.3%, +33.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - good FT shooting team (76-80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games.
(63-28 since 1997.) (69.2%, +32.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, playing on back-to-back days.
(72-35 since 1997.) (67.3%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(153-80 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +63.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 115 points or less.
(32-9 since 1997.) (78%, +21.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), after a game - attempting 20+ more free throws than opponent.
(26-7 since 1997.) (78.8%, +21.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 115 points or less.
(37-13 since 1997.) (74%, +21.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game - attempting 20+ more free throws than opponent.
(26-5 since 1997.) (83.9%, +18.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(75-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(101-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.9%, +47 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(101-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.9%, +47 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(101-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.9%, +47 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(54-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(54-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(54-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(26-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +18 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(21-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +15.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(21-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.7%, +18.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(286-310 since 1997.) (48%, +77.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - vs. division opponents, off a close win by 3 points or less over a division rival.
(166-126 since 1997.) (56.8%, +53.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in July games.
(95-90 since 1997.) (51.4%, +48.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games.
(75-77 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.3%, +31.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(150-149 since 1997.) (50.2%, +42.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after being beaten by the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in July games.
(62-55 since 1997.) (53%, +40 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in July games.
(42-31 since 1997.) (57.5%, +34 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(72-48 since 1997.) (60%, +32.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(59-36 since 1997.) (62.1%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(59-36 since 1997.) (62.1%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(59-36 since 1997.) (62.1%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after 5 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(47-26 since 1997.) (64.4%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(39-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +26 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(51-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.2%, +27.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(21-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +21.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(20-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.9%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(33-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +20 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| NEW YORK | 73 | | 27-64 | 41.3% | 3-12 | 27.4% | 17-22 | 76.5% | 48 | 11 | 16 | | INDIANA | 73 | | 25-64 | 39.7% | 5-15 | 36.3% | 17-23 | 74.3% | 40 | 8 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, INDIANA won the game straight up 491 times, while NEW YORK won 482 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
NEW YORK is 7-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.3, OPPONENT 69.9 | NEW YORK is 6-1 against the money line (+5.8 Units) when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 69.7, OPPONENT 65.4 | NEW YORK is 71-50 against the money line (+17.7 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.5, OPPONENT 70.0 | NEW YORK is 6-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.1, OPPONENT 77.6 | NEW YORK is 85-40 against the money line (+56.0 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.6, OPPONENT 70.6 | INDIANA is 11-15 against the money line (-14.2 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 73.0, OPPONENT 75.0 | INDIANA is 44-68 against the money line (-38.2 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 71.9, OPPONENT 74.4 | INDIANA is 9-16 against the money line (-12.7 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 71.7, OPPONENT 74.0 | INDIANA is 4-10 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 79.4, OPPONENT 85.1 |
|
NEW YORK is 29-61 against the money line (-42.5 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 64.7, OPPONENT 69.3 | INDIANA is 104-66 against the money line (+36.7 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 72.7, OPPONENT 70.3 | INDIANA is 54-27 against the money line (+21.1 Units) when their opponents make 22% to 28% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 72.3, OPPONENT 68.5 | INDIANA is 17-7 against the money line (+14.2 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 77.5, OPPONENT 74.4 | INDIANA is 106-64 against the money line (+26.8 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 72.7, OPPONENT 69.4 |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK is 8-3 against the money line (+7.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.0, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 13-8 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.3, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 9-2 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.6, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 13-8 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.3, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 8-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.3, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 8-1 against the money line (+9.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.7, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 4*) | INDIANA is 8-21 against the money line (-26.2 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 74.2, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 5*) | INDIANA is 26-36 against the money line (-27.2 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 73.6, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 8-2 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of <=40% over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 73.1, OPPONENT 65.6 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 31-21 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 73.3, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 8-3 against the money line (+8.4 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 74.1, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 13-7 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 73.5, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 9-3 against the money line (+9.4 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 74.4, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 14-7 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 75.1, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK is 14-6 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after a game with 8 or less assists since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 69.8, OPPONENT 68.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 12-5 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.0, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 7-2 against the money line (+9.4 Units) as an underdog this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.1, OPPONENT 68.3 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 4-0 against the money line (+6.1 Units) as a road underdog of +200 or less this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.0, OPPONENT 68.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 6-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) in July games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.0, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 12-5 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.0, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 33-21 against the money line (+14.5 Units) on Wednesday since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.2, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 5-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.3, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 187-166 against the money line (+21.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 70.1, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 6-1 against the money line (+6.9 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.3, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 119-109 against the money line (+35.8 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 70.4, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 166-157 against the money line (+22.6 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.1, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 137-118 against the money line (+25.6 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.3, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 171-137 against the money line (+39.2 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.1, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 35-22 against the money line (+16.7 Units) after playing 3 consecutive road games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.3, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 2-7 against the money line (-9.5 Units) in home games after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more shots than opponent since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 62.7, OPPONENT 66.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 93-96 against the money line (-41.0 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 72.5, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 61-63 against the money line (-35.2 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 72.4, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 99-103 against the money line (-40.9 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 72.2, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 148-148 against the money line (-52.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 72.3, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
NEW YORK is 1-11 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after a game with 55 or more rebounds since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.5, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 6-15 against the money line (-10.7 Units) off an upset win as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 66.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 21-15 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 75.8, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 20-13 against the money line (+9.1 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 76.2, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 8-4 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 75.7, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 97-64 against the money line (+32.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 74.8, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 134-112 against the money line (+21.2 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 71.2, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 75-39 against the money line (+32.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 73.1, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 12-5 | +9.1 | 12-4 | 8-9 | 73.0 | 37.4 | 40.6% | 47.0 | 70.8 | 36.6 | 37.4% | 40.6 | | Road Games | 6-3 | +5.6 | 6-2 | 4-5 | 72.9 | 39.0 | 39.4% | 48.2 | 71.8 | 37.4 | 38.3% | 39.9 | | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +6.2 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 72.6 | 34.8 | 38.1% | 52.4 | 65.6 | 33.8 | 37.9% | 39.2 | | Division Games | 6-4 | +2.9 | 7-3 | 5-5 | 73.3 | 38.2 | 40.5% | 45.1 | 73.5 | 38.1 | 37.6% | 43.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 73.0 | 37.4 | 26-65 | 40.6% | 3-12 | 28.0% | 17-23 | 76.4% | 47 | 11 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75.9 | 37.8 | 28-66 | 42.6% | 5-14 | 32.1% | 15-19 | 79.3% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.9 | 39.0 | 25-65 | 39.4% | 3-11 | 28.4% | 19-25 | 77.0% | 48 | 12 | 15 | 20 | 7 | 16 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.8 | 36.6 | 24-65 | 37.4% | 6-18 | 33.6% | 16-20 | 83.3% | 41 | 7 | 16 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 74.8 | 37.6 | 27-66 | 41.8% | 5-16 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 78.6% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 71.8 | 37.4 | 25-65 | 38.3% | 5-17 | 29.2% | 17-20 | 84.4% | 40 | 7 | 18 | 22 | 7 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 9-8 | +3 | 6-10 | 10-7 | 76.3 | 40.8 | 42.3% | 40.2 | 77.6 | 40.3 | 43.6% | 43.4 | | Home Games | 5-4 | +1.4 | 2-6 | 6-3 | 77.4 | 40.7 | 43.4% | 40.1 | 76.8 | 40.9 | 42.0% | 44.8 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.8 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 70.6 | 38.6 | 40.7% | 40.6 | 75.4 | 39.8 | 43.6% | 44.0 | | Division Games | 5-6 | +1.3 | 5-6 | 6-5 | 75.9 | 40.8 | 41.1% | 41.2 | 78.7 | 40.3 | 44.5% | 42.9 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 76.3 | 40.8 | 27-65 | 42.3% | 5-15 | 36.0% | 16-22 | 74.7% | 40 | 9 | 14 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75.1 | 37.9 | 28-67 | 41.7% | 5-15 | 32.9% | 14-18 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 77.4 | 40.7 | 28-65 | 43.4% | 4-14 | 30.2% | 16-23 | 72.9% | 40 | 9 | 13 | 23 | 8 | 12 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.6 | 40.3 | 28-64 | 43.6% | 5-15 | 31.2% | 17-21 | 78.6% | 43 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 76.2 | 37.9 | 28-67 | 42.4% | 5-15 | 32.0% | 15-19 | 79.6% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 76.8 | 40.9 | 27-64 | 42.0% | 5-17 | 32.0% | 17-22 | 79.7% | 45 | 10 | 14 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 5 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: NEW YORK 69.6, INDIANA 71.3 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/19/2015 | INDIANA | 63-80 | L | -165 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 40 | 16 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 44 | 9 | | 6/21/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 73-64 | W | +175 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 44 | 21 | 19-64 | 29.7% | 45 | 18 | | 6/26/2015 | @ TULSA | 62-71 | L | +325 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 44 | 26 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 34 | 13 | | 6/28/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 79-70 | W | -165 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 39 | 9 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 39 | 10 | | 6/30/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 89-81 | W | +180 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 45 | 12 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 39 | 8 | | 7/9/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 79-76 | W | +155 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 49 | 16 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 45 | 12 | | 7/12/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 76-84 | L | -165 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 45 | 17 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 40 | 15 | | 7/15/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 84-68 | W | -450 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 47 | 12 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 38 | 11 | | 7/16/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 64-57 | W | -220 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 53 | 13 | 21-70 | 30.0% | 47 | 15 | | 7/18/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 75-73 | W | +220 | 25-77 | 32.5% | 61 | 9 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 36 | 12 | | 7/21/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 81-77 | W | -200 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 39 | 10 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 36 | 14 | | 7/22/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 59-53 | W | +100 | 17-66 | 25.8% | 62 | 13 | 20-63 | 31.7% | 39 | 12 | | 7/29/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2015 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2015 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/19/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 80-63 | W | +145 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 44 | 9 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 40 | 16 | | 6/20/2015 | WASHINGTON | 75-87 | L | -105 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 36 | 13 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 45 | 17 | | 6/26/2015 | CHICAGO | 77-83 | L | +135 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 43 | 18 | 32-77 | 41.6% | 43 | 9 | | 6/30/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 92-84 | W | +170 | 31-56 | 55.4% | 36 | 19 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 31 | 10 | | 7/2/2015 | WASHINGTON | 73-50 | W | +145 | 29-58 | 50.0% | 37 | 7 | 17-58 | 29.3% | 39 | 15 | | 7/8/2015 | SEATTLE | 88-65 | W | -270 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 32 | 11 | 19-45 | 42.2% | 36 | 19 | | 7/10/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 83-76 | W | -330 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 37 | 10 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 44 | 13 | | 7/15/2015 | TULSA | 83-80 | W | -155 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 50 | 13 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 48 | 12 | | 7/17/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 50-68 | L | +105 | 18-57 | 31.6% | 39 | 17 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 48 | 9 | | 7/21/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 62-80 | L | -125 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 25 | 10 | 27-45 | 60.0% | 43 | 20 | | 7/28/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 75-73 | W | -105 | 33-81 | 40.7% | 52 | 13 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 37 | 18 | | 7/29/2015 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2015 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2015 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2015 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| INDIANA is 42-27 (+10.8 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK since 1997 |
| |
| INDIANA is 7-4 (+0.7 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| INDIANA is 25-7 (+13.1 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK since 1997 |
| |
| INDIANA is 3-1 (+0.3 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/19/2015 | INDIANA | 80 | 153 | SU ATS | 48 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 10-17 | 58.8% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 44 | 4 | 9 | | | NEW YORK | 63 | -3.5 | Under | 33 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 40 | 11 | 16 | 6/9/2015 | INDIANA | 79 | 149 | Over | 41 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 23-25 | 92.0% | 41 | 10 | 15 | | | NEW YORK | 86 | -3 | SU ATS | 38 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 23-32 | 71.9% | 40 | 7 | 12 | 8/17/2014 | INDIANA | 61 | 143 | Under | 32 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 8-9 | 88.9% | 43 | 11 | 17 | | | NEW YORK | 73 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 36 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 0-4 | 0.0% | 15-23 | 65.2% | 38 | 3 | 10 | 8/14/2014 | NEW YORK | 63 | 142 | Under | 21 | 23-59 | 39.0% | 0-4 | 0.0% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 41 | 7 | 17 | | | INDIANA | 76 | -6 | SU ATS | 46 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 15-24 | 62.5% | 45 | 8 | 14 | 8/10/2014 | INDIANA | 90 | 141.5 | SU ATS | 51 | 35-61 | 57.4% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 33 | 7 | 11 | | | NEW YORK | 76 | 0 | Over | 32 | 29-53 | 54.7% | 2-5 | 40.0% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 27 | 3 | 14 | 5/31/2014 | NEW YORK | 66 | 142 | Under | 36 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 2-5 | 40.0% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 42 | 10 | 18 | | | INDIANA | 70 | -3 | SU ATS | 39 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 37 | 8 | 11 |
|
| | |
|
Bill is 15-12 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in July games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 26-21 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 71.9, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 35-21 against the money line (+19.8 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 72.7, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 6-2 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games after a game making no 3 point shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 74.9, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 95-76 against the money line (+26.0 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 72.6, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 59-45 against the money line (+24.0 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 72.2, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 41-23 against the money line (+17.7 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 73.9, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 55-36 against the money line (+21.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 70.6, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 35-32 against the money line (+16.2 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 72.0, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Bill is 10-13 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after a game with 55 or more rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 75.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 6-15 against the money line (-10.7 Units) off an upset win as an underdog as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 66.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 4-10 against the money line (-8.2 Units) off an upset win as a road underdog as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 67.1, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 4-13 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after allowing 55 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 69.8, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Bill is 14-18 against the money line (-19.9 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Bill 72.2, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 3-8 against the money line (-8.1 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 2-7 against the money line (-7.9 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 70.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog won the game straight up 89 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 66 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 5 times, while the road underdog won straight up 4 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [F] 06/15/2015 - Rebecca Allen out for season ( Knee ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/11/2024 3:27:52 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|