| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
SEATTLE WASHINGTON |
|
| 143.5 | 74 Final 87 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
601 | SEATTLE | +280 | 602 | WASHINGTON | -360 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - in non-conference games, off a home loss. (291-201 since 1997.) (59.1%, +84.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (130-63 since 1997.) (67.4%, +46.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an good defensive team (38-40.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (93-46 since 1997.) (66.9%, +40.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (38-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.2%, +26.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games. (93-51 since 1997.) (64.6%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games. (46-32 since 1997.) (59%, +28.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - in non-conference games, off a home cover where the team lost straight up as an underdog. (21-7 since 1997.) (75%, +15.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws. (276-261 since 1997.) (51.4%, +74.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games. (191-120 since 1997.) (61.4%, +55 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games. (75-77 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.3%, +31.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games. (83-72 since 1997.) (53.5%, +41.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (89-60 since 1997.) (59.7%, +41 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (63-42 since 1997.) (60%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (63-42 since 1997.) (60%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (63-42 since 1997.) (60%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (35-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +21.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (63-39 since 1997.) (61.8%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE | 66 | | 26-63 | 41.0% | 5-17 | 30.6% | 9-11 | 80.3% | 40 | 7 | 14 | WASHINGTON | 76 | | 28-65 | 42.8% | 6-18 | 31.6% | 14-18 | 78.3% | 43 | 9 | 11 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON won the game straight up 761 times, while SEATTLE won 220 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
SEATTLE is 24-24 against the money line (+16.6 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 72.4, OPPONENT 76.2 | WASHINGTON is 87-148 against the money line (-53.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.9, OPPONENT 78.2 | WASHINGTON is 70-103 against the money line (-43.0 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 73.2 | WASHINGTON is 4-9 against the money line (-9.2 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 76.7 | WASHINGTON is 26-37 against the money line (-24.2 Units) in home games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.9, OPPONENT 73.3 | WASHINGTON is 64-100 against the money line (-43.8 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 74.3 | WASHINGTON is 120-192 against the money line (-76.1 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 74.2 | WASHINGTON is 133-187 against the money line (-57.2 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 73.3 |
|
SEATTLE is 4-13 against the money line (-11.4 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 69.0, OPPONENT 76.7 | SEATTLE is 37-77 against the money line (-48.8 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 68.8, OPPONENT 71.9 | SEATTLE is 30-60 against the money line (-27.8 Units) in road games when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 70.5, OPPONENT 73.8 | WASHINGTON is 10-4 against the money line (+11.2 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.1, OPPONENT 70.4 | WASHINGTON is 14-5 against the money line (+10.7 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.2, OPPONENT 70.0 | WASHINGTON is 8-0 against the money line (+9.8 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.1, OPPONENT 68.3 |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 10-4 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 15-9 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 75.7, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 86-61 against the money line (+22.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 73.8, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 124-93 against the money line (+28.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.0, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 83-72 against the money line (+20.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 73.3, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 120-108 against the money line (+22.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 73.3, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 117-142 against the money line (-57.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 61-81 against the money line (-42.6 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 21-29 against the money line (-19.0 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 32-42 against the money line (-27.1 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 26-53 against the money line (-24.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 25-39 against the money line (-28.7 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 85-145 against the money line (-68.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.5, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 132-201 against the money line (-73.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.3, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 114-192 against the money line (-84.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 181-279 against the money line (-98.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 13-24 against the money line (-15.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-28 against the money line (-19.5 Units) versus teams who average 37 or less rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 65.9, OPPONENT 68.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 18-31 against the money line (-18.9 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.5, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 65-101 against the money line (-45.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 31-36 against the money line (-24.2 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 37-72 against the money line (-31.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 8-29 against the money line (-18.6 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 65.0, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 98-86 against the money line (+28.3 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 72.0, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 52-36 against the money line (+30.5 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 72.4, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 31-33 against the money line (+17.4 Units) in road games after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 72.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 94-77 against the money line (+22.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.6, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 237-359 against the money line (-113.4 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 142-157 against the money line (-64.8 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 45-66 against the money line (-43.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 73-114 against the money line (-48.5 Units) in July games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 167-240 against the money line (-69.2 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 20-44 against the money line (-32.1 Units) on Wednesday since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 0-5 against the money line (-8.8 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 65.2, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 104-164 against the money line (-60.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 107-178 against the money line (-80.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-14 against the money line (-10.0 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 36-58 against the money line (-30.5 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.8, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 42-68 against the money line (-33.4 Units) off an upset win as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 130-232 against the money line (-88.8 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.3, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 111-174 against the money line (-66.8 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 20-38 against the money line (-23.2 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 102-132 against the money line (-45.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 18-35 against the money line (-23.4 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.6, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 1-10 against the money line (-9.8 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 69.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 8-22 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 71.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 3-10 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 68.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 10-4 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.0, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 18-13 against the money line (+11.2 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.9, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 10-4 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in home games after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 67.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.6, OPPONENT 67.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 5-13 | -6.6 | 10-8 | 10-8 | 69.7 | 34.3 | 43.0% | 36.2 | 76.2 | 39.7 | 43.7% | 41.8 | Road Games | 1-8 | -6 | 4-5 | 4-5 | 64.6 | 30.2 | 39.4% | 34.4 | 77.1 | 40.0 | 44.5% | 44.1 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +0.6 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 74.0 | 37.8 | 45.4% | 35.2 | 75.8 | 39.4 | 45.8% | 40.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.7 | 34.3 | 26-60 | 43.0% | 5-16 | 32.9% | 12-15 | 80.2% | 36 | 5 | 17 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 74.6 | 36.5 | 27-65 | 42.0% | 5-15 | 32.4% | 15-19 | 79.3% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 64.6 | 30.2 | 24-60 | 39.4% | 6-18 | 31.9% | 11-13 | 85.0% | 34 | 4 | 17 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.2 | 39.7 | 28-65 | 43.7% | 5-17 | 31.9% | 14-18 | 77.4% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 75.3 | 37.5 | 28-66 | 42.0% | 5-15 | 33.2% | 15-19 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 77.1 | 40.0 | 29-65 | 44.5% | 5-17 | 31.2% | 14-18 | 77.4% | 44 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 9-6 | -0.3 | 6-9 | 6-9 | 73.3 | 37.9 | 41.2% | 40.7 | 71.7 | 37.3 | 40.1% | 43.9 | Home Games | 5-3 | -1.1 | 3-5 | 5-3 | 76.6 | 38.1 | 41.8% | 41.0 | 71.7 | 36.1 | 41.6% | 41.2 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.7 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 73.2 | 37.8 | 39.6% | 41.2 | 73.0 | 42.2 | 39.2% | 49.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.3 | 37.9 | 26-64 | 41.2% | 6-18 | 32.5% | 15-19 | 77.9% | 41 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 76.2 | 38.2 | 27-65 | 42.2% | 5-15 | 33.0% | 16-20 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 76.6 | 38.1 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 5-17 | 31.7% | 15-20 | 77.8% | 41 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.7 | 37.3 | 27-68 | 40.1% | 4-14 | 29.0% | 13-15 | 82.7% | 44 | 12 | 15 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 76.5 | 39 | 28-67 | 41.6% | 5-15 | 32.7% | 16-20 | 77.6% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 71.7 | 36.1 | 27-66 | 41.6% | 5-15 | 31.1% | 12-14 | 83.5% | 41 | 10 | 15 | 21 | 5 | 14 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: SEATTLE 70.8, WASHINGTON 70.1 |
| | |
|
|
6/21/2015 | PHOENIX | 72-84 | L | +120 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 43 | 15 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 36 | 8 | 6/25/2015 | MINNESOTA | 73-76 | L | +400 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 36 | 17 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 40 | 14 | 6/27/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 71-73 | L | +180 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 34 | 14 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 45 | 15 | 6/28/2015 | @ TULSA | 89-93 | L | +550 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 30 | 9 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 43 | 13 | 6/30/2015 | TULSA | 74-69 | W | +120 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 42 | 9 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 43 | 10 | 7/3/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 57-82 | L | +600 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 28 | 12 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 42 | 13 | 7/5/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 64-72 | L | +210 | 23-59 | 39.0% | 36 | 14 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 49 | 12 | 7/8/2015 | @ INDIANA | 65-88 | L | +210 | 19-45 | 42.2% | 36 | 19 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 32 | 11 | 7/10/2015 | PHOENIX | 79-94 | L | +280 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 32 | 15 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 39 | 10 | 7/12/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 60-70 | L | | 24-63 | 38.1% | 37 | 12 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 44 | 13 | 7/15/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 68-61 | W | +135 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 31 | 11 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 41 | 21 | 7/18/2015 | ATLANTA | 86-73 | W | +120 | 33-58 | 56.9% | 40 | 16 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 39 | 19 | 7/21/2015 | NEW YORK | 77-81 | L | +170 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 36 | 14 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 39 | 10 | 7/29/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2015 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2015 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2015 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/19/2015 | TULSA | 82-86 | L | -165 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 38 | 12 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 37 | 9 | 6/20/2015 | @ INDIANA | 87-75 | W | -115 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 45 | 17 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 36 | 13 | 6/23/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 84-80 | W | -650 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 32 | 9 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 43 | 17 | 6/26/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 69-72 | L | -165 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 34 | 17 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 45 | 17 | 6/28/2015 | CHICAGO | 86-71 | W | -115 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 40 | 10 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 31 | 9 | 7/2/2015 | @ INDIANA | 50-73 | L | -165 | 17-58 | 29.3% | 39 | 15 | 29-58 | 50.0% | 37 | 7 | 7/9/2015 | NEW YORK | 76-79 | L | -175 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 45 | 12 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 49 | 16 | 7/15/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 57-85 | L | +180 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 44 | 14 | 38-83 | 45.8% | 54 | 8 | 7/17/2015 | INDIANA | 68-50 | W | -125 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 48 | 9 | 18-57 | 31.6% | 39 | 17 | 7/19/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 89-82 | W | -270 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 38 | 12 | 32-74 | 43.2% | 47 | 15 | 7/21/2015 | @ TULSA | 76-69 | W | +145 | 25-56 | 44.6% | 31 | 8 | 23-73 | 31.5% | 60 | 14 | 7/29/2015 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2015 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
SEATTLE is 16-11 (+3.3 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
SEATTLE is 3-1 (+2.8 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
WASHINGTON is 8-5 (-0.1 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE since 1997 |
| |
SEATTLE is 1-1 (+0.8 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/22/2014 | WASHINGTON | 86 | 140.5 | ATS | 41 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 35 | 7 | 11 | | SEATTLE | 89 | -3.5 | SU Over | 45 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 12-24 | 50.0% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 45 | 12 | 8 | 5/24/2014 | SEATTLE | 73 | 145 | SU ATS | 24 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 16-16 | 100.0% | 34 | 5 | 15 | | WASHINGTON | 65 | -5.5 | Under | 26 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 14-15 | 93.3% | 41 | 6 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Mike is 6-14 against the money line (-10.0 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 21-20 against the money line (-21.2 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.7, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 11-22 against the money line (-19.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.8, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 13-24 against the money line (-15.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 9-12 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 69.3, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 38-43 against the money line (-30.5 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 73.1, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Jenny is 3-16 against the money line (-14.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Jenny 71.3, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 169-118 against the money line (+25.6 Units) in May, June, or July games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 91-66 against the money line (+19.8 Units) after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 18-13 against the money line (+11.2 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.9, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 10-4 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in home games after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 67.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 99-75 against the money line (+25.9 Units) after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.9, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 23-18 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.8, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 20-5 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus teams who average 37 or less rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 71.8, OPPONENT 65.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Mike is 27-12 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus teams who average 37 or less rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 71.9, OPPONENT 67.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 32-6 against the money line (+18.2 Units) versus terrible teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 81.1, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 50-32 against the money line (+16.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 73.6, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 112 times, while the road underdog won straight up 49 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 12 times, while the road underdog won straight up 8 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 07/16/2015 - Monica Wright out indefinitely ( Knee ) | |
[C] 07/09/2015 - Kia Vaughn expected to miss 2-3 weeks ( Concussion ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/2/2024 7:43:09 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|