| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA SAN ANTONIO |
|
| 152 | 85 Final 102 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
607 | ATLANTA | +100 | 608 | SAN ANTONIO | -120 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (287-98 since 1997.) (74.5%, +92.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (367-224 since 1997.) (62.1%, +90.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (306-109 since 1997.) (73.7%, +88.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG). (83-49 since 1997.) (62.9%, +39.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog. (23-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.7%, +24.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (81-46 since 1997.) (63.8%, +34.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games. (96-62 since 1997.) (60.8%, +34.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games. (56-29 since 1997.) (65.9%, +30.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (153-80 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +63.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (57-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.8%, +22.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (61-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (67%, +17.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (41-22 since 1997.) (65.1%, +26 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (25-9 since 1997.) (73.5%, +18.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (25-9 since 1997.) (73.5%, +18.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (25-9 since 1997.) (73.5%, +18.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog. (31-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.5%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (101-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.9%, +47 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (101-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.9%, +47 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (101-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.9%, +47 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off an upset win as an underdog. (31-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +20.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (210-162 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.5%, +56 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (42-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.4%, +26.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (195-143 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.7%, +56 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (286-310 since 1997.) (48%, +77.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (242-197 since 1997.) (55.1%, +63.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off an upset win as an underdog against opponent off a road loss against a division rival. (137-89 since 1997.) (60.6%, +52 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (122-79 since 1997.) (60.7%, +49.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (130-63 since 1997.) (67.4%, +46.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (38-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.2%, +26.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SAN ANTONIO) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (93-52 since 1997.) (64.1%, +35.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a loss against a division rival, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%). (59-23 since 1997.) (72%, +30.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%) after 15 or more games. (41-14 since 1997.) (74.5%, +30.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SAN ANTONIO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (52-27 since 1997.) (65.8%, +28.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a road loss against a division rival, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%). (40-11 since 1997.) (78.4%, +28 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games. (57-33 since 1997.) (63.3%, +25.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games. (33-11 since 1997.) (75%, +24.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a loss against a division rival, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%) after 15 or more games. (43-15 since 1997.) (74.1%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record. (43-20 since 1997.) (68.3%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games. (54-33 since 1997.) (62.1%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (28-15 since 1997.) (65.1%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (23-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.2%, +22.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (36-19 since 1997.) (65.5%, +21.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SAN ANTONIO) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (37-17 since 1997.) (68.5%, +18.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record. (26-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +20.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games. (24-10 since 1997.) (70.6%, +18 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%) after 15 or more games. (27-10 since 1997.) (73%, +17 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after beating the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games. (19-7 since 1997.) (73.1%, +16.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (42-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.4%, +26.3 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA | 73 | | 29-70 | 41.3% | 5-15 | 30.2% | 11-15 | 75.0% | 44 | 13 | 16 | SAN ANTONIO | 74 | | 26-61 | 43.3% | 3-12 | 27.2% | 18-23 | 79.6% | 41 | 8 | 16 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, SAN ANTONIO won the game straight up 528 times, while ATLANTA won 440 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
ATLANTA is 26-14 against the money line (+11.7 Units) when their opponents make 22% to 28% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 75.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 36-82 against the money line (-66.9 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.2, OPPONENT 77.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 40-52 against the money line (-24.5 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.8, OPPONENT 74.0 | SAN ANTONIO is 21-54 against the money line (-34.6 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 69.5, OPPONENT 75.9 | SAN ANTONIO is 19-27 against the money line (-19.2 Units) in home games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 76.9 | SAN ANTONIO is 5-12 against the money line (-10.0 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.5, OPPONENT 80.2 | SAN ANTONIO is 23-26 against the money line (-20.4 Units) in home games when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.9, OPPONENT 79.3 | SAN ANTONIO is 13-30 against the money line (-17.8 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 79.2 | SAN ANTONIO is 92-118 against the money line (-47.7 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 75.2 | SAN ANTONIO is 5-17 against the money line (-15.9 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 81.7 | SAN ANTONIO is 80-129 against the money line (-60.4 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.3, OPPONENT 75.0 |
|
ATLANTA is 5-10 against the money line (-17.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was ATLANTA 74.9, OPPONENT 79.8 | ATLANTA is 29-57 against the money line (-58.5 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 82.4 | ATLANTA is 7-15 against the money line (-15.2 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 70.9, OPPONENT 77.2 | ATLANTA is 21-31 against the money line (-29.3 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.3, OPPONENT 81.8 | ATLANTA is 55-63 against the money line (-29.8 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 80.5 | ATLANTA is 6-9 against the money line (-12.1 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 79.5 | ATLANTA is 18-18 against the money line (-16.2 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 82.6, OPPONENT 81.9 | ATLANTA is 7-11 against the money line (-18.1 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.7, OPPONENT 77.1 | ATLANTA is 11-19 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.7, OPPONENT 79.6 |
|
| | |
|
SAN ANTONIO is 85-92 against the money line (-39.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 72-64 against the money line (-41.4 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.2, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 152-202 against the money line (-61.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.7, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 21-36 against the money line (-20.0 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 40-58 against the money line (-29.4 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.1, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 66-57 against the money line (-41.2 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 36-31 against the money line (-26.3 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.9, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 15-17 against the money line (-28.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 7-12 against the money line (-18.5 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 3-9 against the money line (-14.7 Units) in road games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 71.9, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 2-7 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in road games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.0, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 9-13 against the money line (-15.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 19-20 against the money line (-17.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-11 against the money line (-10.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 82.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 8-20 against the money line (-14.9 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-14 against the money line (-19.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 16-19 against the money line (-17.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-14 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 20-21 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-6 against the money line (-12.0 Units) versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.5, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-12 against the money line (-16.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 15-17 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-6 against the money line (-8.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 83.4, OPPONENT 88.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 12-17 against the money line (-14.9 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-15 against the money line (-19.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 18-21 against the money line (-20.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 3-8 against the money line (-17.2 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 3-6 against the money line (-11.0 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-8 against the money line (-12.6 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-11 against the money line (-11.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-22 against the money line (-21.0 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.4, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 43-30 against the money line (+13.7 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.7, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 190-253 against the money line (-73.5 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 101-70 against the money line (-46.1 Units) as a favorite since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 80-59 against the money line (-47.2 Units) as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 113-108 against the money line (-49.8 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 90-83 against the money line (-45.7 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.6, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 67-89 against the money line (-38.1 Units) against Eastern conference opponents since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 91-140 against the money line (-57.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.3, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 23-33 against the money line (-19.1 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.1, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 67-89 against the money line (-38.1 Units) in non-conference games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 1-8 against the money line (-7.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 70.8, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 45-79 against the money line (-49.6 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 13-19 against the money line (-20.3 Units) in home games after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.4, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 16-26 against the money line (-23.0 Units) in home games off an upset win as an underdog since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 4-10 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 45-49 against the money line (-39.1 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 40-61 against the money line (-31.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 29-31 against the money line (-22.6 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.6, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 5-11 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 82.3, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 59-100 against the money line (-36.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 85-118 against the money line (-43.7 Units) after a game where they covered the spread since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.9, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 15-26 against the money line (-28.0 Units) in home games after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 3*) | SAN ANTONIO is 42-46 against the money line (-37.3 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 12-22 against the money line (-20.8 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.8, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 7-10 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in all games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 74.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 9-17 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 9-17 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 7-15 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 10-13 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in July games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 7-10 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in May, June, or July games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 74.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 3-14 against the money line (-15.3 Units) in road games against Western conference opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.2, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 4-6 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after a division game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 73.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-11 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.6, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 8-17 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.0, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 1-6 against the money line (-7.6 Units) in road games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.0, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 5-9 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-14 against the money line (-15.3 Units) in road games in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.2, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 14-13 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 3-8 against the money line (-9.5 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 70.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 2-7 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after 2 straight games where they were called for 22 or more fouls over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.3, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 1-9 against the money line (-11.3 Units) in road games after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.2, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 4-9 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in road games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 11-15 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.1, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 14-15 against the money line (-18.4 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-17 against the money line (-18.1 Units) off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 8-9 against the money line (-16.5 Units) off a road loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-15 against the money line (-16.1 Units) off a road cover where the team lost straight up as an underdog since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-10 against the money line (-20.0 Units) off a road loss over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 2-9 against the money line (-17.2 Units) off 2 or more consecutive road losses over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 6*) | ATLANTA is 15-19 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 10-17 against the money line (-21.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 8-15 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 6-13 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 18-18 against the money line (-20.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 11-14 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 19-20 against the money line (-21.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-10 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 5-10 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-14 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 4-8 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 2-6 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 18-18 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 21-21 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 5-15 against the money line (-19.3 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.8, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 5-13 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.3, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 12-19 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.8, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 5-8 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-9 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.4, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-7 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.0, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 2-5 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after playing a road game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.1, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 2-8 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 6*) | ATLANTA is 2-6 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after playing 3 consecutive road games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.6, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 12-14 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 12-13 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 11-15 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 9-3 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in home games when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.1, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 4-0 against the money line (+5.5 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent this season. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.8, OPPONENT 63.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 7-10 | -13.5 | 9-8 | 8-9 | 74.8 | 36.6 | 40.1% | 44.7 | 78.5 | 39.1 | 43.9% | 40.5 | Road Games | 2-6 | -5.1 | 5-3 | 5-3 | 76.1 | 37.1 | 40.7% | 40.1 | 82.5 | 41.4 | 47.2% | 40.4 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.8 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 79.2 | 41.6 | 42.5% | 38.6 | 82.2 | 39.4 | 47.4% | 41.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 74.8 | 36.6 | 28-69 | 40.1% | 5-15 | 30.9% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 45 | 12 | 17 | 23 | 9 | 17 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.4 | 38 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 5-15 | 33.1% | 15-19 | 79.4% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 76.1 | 37.1 | 28-69 | 40.7% | 6-17 | 36.0% | 14-18 | 78.7% | 40 | 10 | 16 | 21 | 9 | 17 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.5 | 39.1 | 27-62 | 43.9% | 5-15 | 32.4% | 19-24 | 81.5% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 20 | 9 | 16 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 75.7 | 38 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 5-15 | 32.1% | 15-19 | 79.4% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 82.5 | 41.4 | 29-62 | 47.2% | 4-11 | 34.8% | 20-23 | 86.5% | 40 | 7 | 15 | 17 | 9 | 16 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 5-12 | -5.2 | 9-7 | 7-10 | 71.0 | 33.8 | 41.4% | 41.7 | 76.5 | 38.2 | 44.5% | 41.4 | Home Games | 5-3 | +2.8 | 4-4 | 2-6 | 71.5 | 36.0 | 42.6% | 45.2 | 70.9 | 36.5 | 40.6% | 40.2 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +0.8 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 68.8 | 34.2 | 41.3% | 43.2 | 72.6 | 39.0 | 42.1% | 40.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.0 | 33.8 | 26-63 | 41.4% | 3-13 | 27.6% | 15-19 | 79.1% | 42 | 8 | 15 | 16 | 6 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.4 | 37.1 | 28-66 | 42.1% | 5-15 | 32.9% | 15-19 | 78.8% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 71.5 | 36.0 | 26-62 | 42.6% | 3-12 | 28.0% | 16-20 | 76.8% | 45 | 8 | 16 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.5 | 38.2 | 31-69 | 44.5% | 4-12 | 32.8% | 12-15 | 74.9% | 41 | 10 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 76.7 | 38.5 | 28-66 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 33.6% | 15-19 | 80.3% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 70.9 | 36.5 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 4-11 | 33.7% | 11-15 | 71.9% | 40 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 9 | 12 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 70.7, SAN ANTONIO 71.2 |
| | |
|
|
6/19/2015 | CHICAGO | 74-73 | W | +145 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 51 | 17 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 41 | 18 | 6/21/2015 | NEW YORK | 64-73 | L | -210 | 19-64 | 29.7% | 45 | 18 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 44 | 21 | 6/24/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 96-100 | L | +300 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 50 | 13 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 49 | 15 | 6/26/2015 | WASHINGTON | 72-69 | W | +145 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 45 | 17 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 34 | 17 | 7/5/2015 | SEATTLE | 72-64 | W | -270 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 49 | 12 | 23-59 | 39.0% | 36 | 14 | 7/7/2015 | TULSA | 75-85 | L | -210 | 31-80 | 38.7% | 54 | 17 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 48 | 18 | 7/12/2015 | NEW YORK | 84-76 | W | +145 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 40 | 15 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 45 | 17 | 7/14/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 71-80 | L | +375 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 39 | 14 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 41 | 10 | 7/16/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 76-72 | W | +120 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 42 | 15 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 38 | 16 | 7/18/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 73-86 | L | -140 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 39 | 19 | 33-58 | 56.9% | 40 | 16 | 7/21/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 92-97 | L | +350 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 33 | 14 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 42 | 15 | 7/29/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2015 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/19/2015 | MINNESOTA | 59-74 | L | +250 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 31 | 15 | 31-56 | 55.4% | 37 | 15 | 6/20/2015 | CHICAGO | 87-95 | L | +175 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 49 | 14 | 42-76 | 55.3% | 41 | 12 | 6/25/2015 | PHOENIX | 76-71 | W | +120 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 54 | 19 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 37 | 10 | 6/27/2015 | SEATTLE | 73-71 | W | -220 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 45 | 15 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 34 | 14 | 6/30/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 78-85 | L | +400 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 32 | 10 | 34-57 | 59.6% | 32 | 11 | 7/2/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 81-86 | L | +200 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 34 | 14 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 31 | 10 | 7/8/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 70-63 | W | +155 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 45 | 11 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 39 | 11 | 7/10/2015 | @ INDIANA | 76-83 | L | +250 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 44 | 13 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 37 | 10 | 7/12/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 49-66 | L | | 20-69 | 29.0% | 49 | 13 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 44 | 10 | 7/15/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 68-84 | L | +325 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 38 | 11 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 47 | 12 | 7/17/2015 | TULSA | 65-58 | W | +170 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 54 | 15 | 21-68 | 30.9% | 45 | 11 | 7/19/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 82-93 | L | +500 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 32 | 9 | 40-74 | 54.1% | 43 | 12 | 7/21/2015 | INDIANA | 80-62 | W | +105 | 27-45 | 60.0% | 43 | 20 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 25 | 10 | 7/29/2015 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2015 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2015 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
ATLANTA is 9-6 (+2.7 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO since 1997 |
| |
ATLANTA is 4-1 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
SAN ANTONIO is 4-3 (-0.3 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
SAN ANTONIO is 1-1 (+0.7 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/11/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 69 | 151.5 | ATS | 29 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 7-24 | 29.2% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 39 | 8 | 17 | | ATLANTA | 72 | -6 | SU Under | 32 | 28-76 | 36.8% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 55 | 20 | 15 | 6/26/2014 | ATLANTA | 81 | -3 | SU Under | 45 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 46 | 13 | 13 | | SAN ANTONIO | 79 | 163 | ATS | 42 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 12-23 | 52.2% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 37 | 8 | 16 | 5/16/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 75 | 157.5 | ATS | 36 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 20-27 | 74.1% | 40 | 7 | 16 | | ATLANTA | 79 | -8.5 | SU Under | 38 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 42 | 7 | 16 |
|
| | |
|
Michael is 102-42 against the money line (+42.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.6, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 8-1 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in road games after allowing 90 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 77.0, OPPONENT 68.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 32-16 against the money line (+13.2 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.1, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 155-183 against the money line (-39.7 Units) in all games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 84-55 against the money line (-34.4 Units) as a favorite as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 64-44 against the money line (-35.7 Units) as a home favorite as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.8, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 90-79 against the money line (-33.4 Units) in home games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.1, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 80-69 against the money line (-32.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 29-31 against the money line (-25.9 Units) in home games against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.1, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 76-98 against the money line (-31.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 18-22 against the money line (-13.3 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 79.2, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 29-31 against the money line (-25.9 Units) in home games in non-conference games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.1, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 41-57 against the money line (-30.6 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 12-14 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in home games after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.5, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 50-73 against the money line (-24.7 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.9, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 13-20 against the money line (-19.1 Units) in home games off an upset win as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 64-74 against the money line (-26.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 42-39 against the money line (-29.0 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 38-48 against the money line (-19.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.0, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 43-71 against the money line (-23.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 72-85 against the money line (-27.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 14-18 against the money line (-18.4 Units) in home games after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 37-35 against the money line (-27.3 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 26-34 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 17-25 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.8, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 11-17 against the money line (-14.7 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 1-6 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in home games after 2 straight games making 45% of their 3 point shots or better in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Dan 72.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 34-28 against the money line (-23.9 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.2, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 10-13 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.4, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 78-81 against the money line (-20.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.4, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 113-121 against the money line (-36.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 46-62 against the money line (-22.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.2, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 41-40 against the money line (-22.2 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.5, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 82-100 against the money line (-29.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 124-146 against the money line (-40.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 37-43 against the money line (-18.1 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 108-107 against the money line (-30.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.8, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 62-63 against the money line (-21.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 70-78 against the money line (-24.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 100-112 against the money line (-31.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Michael is 27-27 against the money line (-28.2 Units) in all games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 9-17 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in road games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 9-17 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 7-15 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 24-19 against the money line (-17.7 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 18-16 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after a division game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 14-13 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 6-10 against the money line (-20.0 Units) off a road loss as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Michael is 15-19 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 10-17 against the money line (-21.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Michael is 8-15 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 6-13 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Michael is 18-18 against the money line (-20.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 11-14 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 8-14 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Michael is 4-8 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 2-6 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 18-18 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 5-8 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 75.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 6-9 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 76.4, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 3-7 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 75.0, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 9-16 against the money line (-29.3 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 6*) | Michael is 2-8 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 6*) | Michael is 12-14 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 76.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 12-13 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 15-17 against the money line (-28.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Michael is 7-12 against the money line (-18.5 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 9-13 against the money line (-15.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 19-20 against the money line (-17.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 7-11 against the money line (-10.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 82.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 6-14 against the money line (-19.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Michael is 16-19 against the money line (-17.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 9-14 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 20-21 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 6-12 against the money line (-16.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 15-17 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 1-6 against the money line (-8.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 83.4, OPPONENT 88.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 9-15 against the money line (-19.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 18-21 against the money line (-20.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 3-6 against the money line (-11.0 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 75.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 6-11 against the money line (-11.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 22-8 against the money line (+11.5 Units) as a home favorite of -155 or less as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.1, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 51-44 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in July games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 108-106 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 13-8 against the money line (+8.8 Units) on Wednesday as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 132 times, while the road underdog won straight up 127 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 7 times, while the road underdog won straight up 4 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[F] 07/28/2015 - Cierra Burdick doubtful Wednesday vs. SA Stars ( Foot ) | [F] 07/21/2015 - Sancho Lyttle "?" Wednesday vs. SA Stars ( Foot ) | [G] 06/06/2015 - Celine Dumerc out for season ( Suspension ) | |
[G] 07/17/2015 - Alex Montgomery out indefinitely ( Knee ) | [G] 07/09/2015 - Jia Perkins out indefinitely ( Calf ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/8/2024 10:24:52 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|