| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
MINNESOTA
LOS ANGELES |
|
|
152.5
| 61
Final
83 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 655 | MINNESOTA | -140 | | 656 | LOS ANGELES | +120 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(368-227 since 1997.) (61.8%, +88.7 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, in August or September games.
(48-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +25.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(58-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +22.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road win by 3 points or less, tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days.
(21-6 since 1997.) (77.8%, +15.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in August or September games.
(31-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.5%, +18.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(103-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +22.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(27-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (73%, +18.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(22-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +15.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(64-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.1%, +20.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(28-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.3%, +31.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(76-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +29.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(307-112 since 1997.) (73.3%, +94.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(198-60 since 1997.) (76.7%, +94.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(155-40 since 1997.) (79.5%, +92.6 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(254-87 since 1997.) (74.5%, +92.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(175-37 since 1997.) (82.5%, +88 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(271-74 since 1997.) (78.6%, +87.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(137-24 since 1997.) (85.1%, +86.3 units. Rating = 5*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(224-58 since 1997.) (79.4%, +82.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(212-72 since 1997.) (74.6%, +77 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws.
(281-265 since 1997.) (51.5%, +76.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more.
(264-108 since 1997.) (71%, +76.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more.
(266-109 since 1997.) (70.9%, +74.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(176-56 since 1997.) (75.9%, +74.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more.
(247-95 since 1997.) (72.2%, +73.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(212-56 since 1997.) (79.1%, +73.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 8 or more of their last 10 games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(221-77 since 1997.) (74.2%, +72.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(177-58 since 1997.) (75.3%, +70.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(156-35 since 1997.) (81.7%, +70.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(186-46 since 1997.) (80.2%, +70.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(245-103 since 1997.) (70.4%, +68.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(126-33 since 1997.) (79.2%, +68.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(174-53 since 1997.) (76.7%, +65.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(112-19 since 1997.) (85.5%, +65.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in August or September games.
(197-73 since 1997.) (73%, +63.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(157-41 since 1997.) (79.3%, +61.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(192-73 since 1997.) (72.5%, +61.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws.
(154-57 since 1997.) (73%, +59.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(104-22 since 1997.) (82.5%, +59 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(108-73 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.7%, +40.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(110-33 since 1997.) (76.9%, +55.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season.
(122-39 since 1997.) (75.8%, +55.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(116-28 since 1997.) (80.6%, +54.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(165-63 since 1997.) (72.4%, +53.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(129-43 since 1997.) (75%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, off a close win by 3 points or less over a division rival.
(166-127 since 1997.) (56.7%, +51.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more.
(138-47 since 1997.) (74.6%, +51.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(80-12 since 1997.) (87%, +50.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after scoring 75 points or more.
(124-39 since 1997.) (76.1%, +50.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(73-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.7%, +42.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(127-47 since 1997.) (73%, +49.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(179-113 since 1997.) (61.3%, +49.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(57-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.1%, +39 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(62-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.2%, +40.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(95-39 since 1997.) (70.9%, +48.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(133-64 since 1997.) (67.5%, +48.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(101-26 since 1997.) (79.5%, +48.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(85-21 since 1997.) (80.2%, +47.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - playing with 2 days rest, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(78-22 since 1997.) (78%, +45.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(137-93 since 1997.) (59.6%, +45.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(118-57 since 1997.) (67.4%, +45.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(55-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.4%, +32.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game.
(114-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.5%, +44.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(74-18 since 1997.) (80.4%, +41.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after a win by 6 points or less.
(89-33 since 1997.) (73%, +41.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(42-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.6%, +40.5 units. Rating = 5*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after a win by 6 points or less.
(75-15 since 1997.) (83.3%, +40.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(93-76 over the last 5 seasons.) (55%, +40.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(51-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.8%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(76-30 since 1997.) (71.7%, +39.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(81-25 since 1997.) (76.4%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a combined score of 155 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(61-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.5%, +35.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in August or September games.
(58-13 since 1997.) (81.7%, +37.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(86-29 since 1997.) (74.8%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(83-36 since 1997.) (69.7%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - playing with 2 days rest, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(64-13 since 1997.) (83.1%, +36.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(94-52 since 1997.) (64.4%, +36.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(66-18 since 1997.) (78.6%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(98-70 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.3%, +46 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - average defensive team (65-72 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more.
(71-30 since 1997.) (70.3%, +35 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(96-38 since 1997.) (71.6%, +34.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(60-22 since 1997.) (73.2%, +32.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(130-88 since 1997.) (59.6%, +32.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(40-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.9%, +29.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a combined score of 155 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(55-14 since 1997.) (79.7%, +30.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(26-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.7%, +24 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - playing with 2 days rest, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(43-14 since 1997.) (75.4%, +29.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(68-22 since 1997.) (75.6%, +29 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - average defensive team (65-72 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(59-26 since 1997.) (69.4%, +28.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(52-27 since 1997.) (65.8%, +28.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(92-81 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +31.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(43-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.1%, +27.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(49-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.5%, +27 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(52-24 since 1997.) (68.4%, +27.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - playing with 2 days rest, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(58-30 since 1997.) (65.9%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(61-35 since 1997.) (63.5%, +26.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(44-13 since 1997.) (77.2%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor pressure defensive team - forcing <=14 turnovers/game, on Tuesday nights.
(39-10 since 1997.) (79.6%, +26 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(56-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.2%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(24-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +18.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(52-29 since 1997.) (64.2%, +24.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(44-22 since 1997.) (66.7%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(41-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.7%, +28.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(23-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.7%, +17.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, on Tuesday nights.
(33-7 since 1997.) (82.5%, +23.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(46-15 since 1997.) (75.4%, +23.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road win, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(37-20 since 1997.) (64.9%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(42-21 since 1997.) (66.7%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after a close win by 3 points or less.
(39-14 since 1997.) (73.6%, +23 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(30-8 since 1997.) (78.9%, +22.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(44-19 since 1997.) (69.8%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(79-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.4%, +38 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games.
(37-18 since 1997.) (67.3%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(37-11 since 1997.) (77.1%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(35-9 since 1997.) (79.5%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after a win by 6 points or less.
(29-5 since 1997.) (85.3%, +21.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(24-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +15.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after a win by 6 points or less.
(41-22 since 1997.) (65.1%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(30-12 since 1997.) (71.4%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(56-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.7%, +26.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(33-14 since 1997.) (70.2%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(35-16 since 1997.) (68.6%, +20.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG), after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(24-3 since 1997.) (88.9%, +20.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against a poor team (-3 to -7 PPG differential), after allowing 75 points or more.
(26-5 since 1997.) (83.9%, +19.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(33-15 since 1997.) (68.8%, +19.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(37-17 since 1997.) (68.5%, +18.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(41-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.1%, +15.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(47-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.5%, +33.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, on Tuesday nights.
(23-4 since 1997.) (85.2%, +18.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games.
(26-9 since 1997.) (74.3%, +18.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(63-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.4%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(28-12 since 1997.) (70%, +18.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(67-56 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.5%, +28.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(42-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.5%, +22.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(22-5 since 1997.) (81.5%, +17.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(38-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +26.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(27-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +22.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(24-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +15.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(22-8 since 1997.) (73.3%, +14.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(58-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +31.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(58-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +31.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(58-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +31.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, on Tuesday nights.
(36-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(58-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.4%, +34.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(53-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.8%, +24.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(28-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.3%, +15 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(28-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +21.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games.
(29-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +23.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(42-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(32-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +28.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(37-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.7%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(29-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.5%, +21.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, playing with 2 days rest.
(88-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| MINNESOTA | 79 | | 30-66 | 45.6% | 5-12 | 37.4% | 14-17 | 83.3% | 41 | 8 | 11 | | LOS ANGELES | 73 | | 28-65 | 43.8% | 5-15 | 31.2% | 12-14 | 84.0% | 39 | 7 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 666 times, while LOS ANGELES won 308 times.
Edge against the money line=MINNESOTA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 12-2 against the money line (+10.3 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 76.7 | MINNESOTA is 31-7 against the money line (+17.2 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 75.7 | MINNESOTA is 13-0 against the money line (+13.5 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 74.4 | MINNESOTA is 28-7 against the money line (+17.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.0, OPPONENT 79.6 | MINNESOTA is 41-12 against the money line (+20.4 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 73.8 | LOS ANGELES is 9-19 against the money line (-15.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 81.5 | LOS ANGELES is 37-70 against the money line (-84.6 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 79.6 | LOS ANGELES is 2-8 against the money line (-10.6 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.0, OPPONENT 81.8 | LOS ANGELES is 57-55 against the money line (-30.8 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 75.8 | LOS ANGELES is 0-7 against the money line (-8.5 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 64.1, OPPONENT 74.4 | LOS ANGELES is 2-11 against the money line (-9.6 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.2, OPPONENT 78.9 | LOS ANGELES is 30-54 against the money line (-47.6 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 80.0 | LOS ANGELES is 6-21 against the money line (-23.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 87.4 | LOS ANGELES is 6-20 against the money line (-17.4 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.3, OPPONENT 79.2 | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-7.6 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 66.8, OPPONENT 73.3 | LOS ANGELES is 10-18 against the money line (-16.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 85.2 | LOS ANGELES is 3-11 against the money line (-12.2 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.7, OPPONENT 81.2 |
|
MINNESOTA is 53-84 against the money line (-34.2 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 74.4 | MINNESOTA is 91-94 against the money line (-40.1 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.5, OPPONENT 74.0 |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 34-6 against the money line (+18.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 32-9 against the money line (+18.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 47-17 against the money line (+19.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 31-8 against the money line (+18.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.1, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 44-13 against the money line (+21.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 18-5 against the money line (+12.6 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 25-9 against the money line (+12.2 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 29-10 against the money line (+13.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 39-10 against the money line (+23.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 55-19 against the money line (+22.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 25-7 against the money line (+15.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 37-10 against the money line (+21.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 51-18 against the money line (+21.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-24 against the money line (-19.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-14 against the money line (-17.6 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-29 against the money line (-18.2 Units) when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-19 against the money line (-11.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-11 against the money line (-11.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-18 against the money line (-20.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-13 against the money line (-19.6 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-6 against the money line (-7.4 Units) in home games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-8 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-27 against the money line (-22.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-7 against the money line (-9.4 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-23 against the money line (-17.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-11 against the money line (-11.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.7, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-16 against the money line (-17.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-7 against the money line (-19.2 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-23 against the money line (-14.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 27-23 against the money line (-28.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-29 against the money line (-20.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-15 against the money line (-11.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.0, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-22 against the money line (-15.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-16 against the money line (-11.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-35 against the money line (-25.2 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-14 against the money line (-10.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-26 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-15 against the money line (-19.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-17 against the money line (-12.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-11 against the money line (-13.8 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.8, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-16 against the money line (-14.8 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-23 against the money line (-15.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 67-21 against the money line (+22.2 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 65-13 against the money line (+27.8 Units) as a favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 45-14 against the money line (+19.4 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 45-13 against the money line (+25.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 15-4 against the money line (+10.6 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 30-8 against the money line (+14.9 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 31-9 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 29-17 against the money line (+13.4 Units) in road games after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.6, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 19-6 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 40-13 against the money line (+16.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 35-11 against the money line (+18.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 30-9 against the money line (+15.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 12-1 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 9-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 54-28 against the money line (+17.5 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 9-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 59-18 against the money line (+21.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 47-11 against the money line (+26.9 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 41-10 against the money line (+24.1 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 34-10 against the money line (+17.1 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-14 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-17 against the money line (-18.9 Units) in home games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-16 against the money line (-17.9 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-13 against the money line (-18.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-23 against the money line (-16.0 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-9 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after a division game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-18 against the money line (-15.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-5 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in home games when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.8, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-12 against the money line (-13.3 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-9 against the money line (-10.7 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-6 against the money line (-11.1 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-5 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-11 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-21 against the money line (-16.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-16 against the money line (-12.1 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-16 against the money line (-13.1 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-6 against the money line (-16.3 Units) off a road win against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-8 against the money line (-9.9 Units) off a win against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-8 against the money line (-20.5 Units) off a no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-12 against the money line (-21.5 Units) off a road no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.7, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-7 against the money line (-19.7 Units) in home games off a road win over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-19 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-5 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after a close win by 3 points or less over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-6 against the money line (-9.0 Units) after a win by 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-12 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-16 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-10 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-12 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-6 against the money line (-8.2 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-20 against the money line (-18.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-5 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in home games after playing a game as a road favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-11.5 Units) in home games after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-26 against the money line (-24.5 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-13 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-5 against the money line (-8.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-7 against the money line (-7.7 Units) after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-7 against the money line (-6.7 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 175-180 against the money line (-63.0 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 31-36 against the money line (-31.7 Units) off a road win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.2, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 0-4 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.0, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 122-140 against the money line (-67.5 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.2, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 0-4 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.0, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after a game where opponent was called for 10 or less fouls since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 15-4 | +0.8 | 11-8 | 9-10 | 78.8 | 38.1 | 45.5% | 41.7 | 70.4 | 34.9 | 40.5% | 38.8 | | Road Games | 7-2 | +1.8 | 5-4 | 4-5 | 77.1 | 37.2 | 45.5% | 40.1 | 72.8 | 37.4 | 42.0% | 38.4 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | -0.6 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 82.0 | 38.8 | 43.7% | 42.8 | 75.2 | 34.4 | 43.4% | 39.0 | | Division Games | 11-2 | +3.1 | 8-5 | 5-8 | 77.2 | 37.8 | 46.7% | 40.3 | 68.2 | 35.4 | 39.4% | 37.5 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 78.8 | 38.1 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 4-12 | 36.1% | 14-17 | 83.0% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 16 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 76.7 | 38.1 | 28-65 | 43.3% | 5-14 | 33.5% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 77.1 | 37.2 | 29-64 | 45.5% | 4-12 | 31.8% | 15-18 | 84.7% | 40 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.4 | 34.9 | 27-65 | 40.5% | 6-18 | 32.0% | 12-14 | 81.3% | 39 | 8 | 16 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.4 | 37.9 | 28-66 | 41.9% | 5-16 | 33.2% | 15-19 | 79.5% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 72.8 | 37.4 | 27-64 | 42.0% | 6-19 | 33.5% | 13-17 | 76.0% | 38 | 7 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 5-14 | -9.8 | 6-13 | 11-8 | 71.9 | 35.9 | 44.1% | 39.2 | 76.8 | 36.0 | 43.7% | 38.9 | | Home Games | 3-6 | -3.3 | 2-7 | 4-5 | 71.6 | 36.1 | 43.7% | 38.2 | 74.8 | 33.6 | 43.8% | 39.4 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2.1 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 73.4 | 34.8 | 47.5% | 38.0 | 72.2 | 39.4 | 40.6% | 38.6 | | Division Games | 4-8 | -5 | 3-9 | 6-6 | 71.6 | 36.4 | 45.0% | 38.6 | 77.3 | 36.9 | 46.1% | 36.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 71.9 | 35.9 | 27-62 | 44.1% | 5-15 | 31.8% | 12-15 | 83.7% | 39 | 7 | 18 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75 | 37.8 | 28-66 | 42.3% | 5-15 | 33.2% | 14-18 | 79.4% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 71.6 | 36.1 | 27-62 | 43.7% | 4-14 | 29.2% | 14-16 | 82.4% | 38 | 7 | 18 | 18 | 5 | 12 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.8 | 36.0 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 5-14 | 34.1% | 17-22 | 76.6% | 39 | 8 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 74.8 | 37.3 | 28-65 | 42.1% | 5-15 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 79.1% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 74.8 | 33.6 | 27-63 | 43.8% | 5-14 | 33.3% | 15-20 | 75.8% | 39 | 8 | 16 | 18 | 6 | 10 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 69.4, LOS ANGELES 70.2 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/25/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 76-73 | W | -600 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 40 | 14 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 36 | 17 | | 6/27/2015 | PHOENIX | 71-56 | W | -270 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 40 | 12 | 19-57 | 33.3% | 42 | 20 | | 7/3/2015 | SEATTLE | 82-57 | W | -950 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 42 | 13 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 28 | 12 | | 7/10/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 83-90 | L | -165 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 41 | 9 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 40 | 10 | | 7/12/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 66-49 | W | | 29-70 | 41.4% | 44 | 10 | 20-69 | 29.0% | 49 | 13 | | 7/14/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 85-79 | W | -270 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 34 | 15 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 14 | | 7/17/2015 | CHICAGO | 84-66 | W | -210 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 46 | 10 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 47 | 12 | | 7/19/2015 | @ TULSA | 79-72 | W | -155 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 41 | 11 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 38 | 13 | | 7/22/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 77-78 | L | -360 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 50 | 16 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 42 | 15 | | 7/29/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 82-76 | W | -400 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 31 | 12 | 31-55 | 56.4% | 32 | 21 | | 7/31/2015 | ATLANTA | 86-70 | W | | 33-77 | 42.9% | 49 | 15 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 40 | 19 | | 8/1/2015 | @ TULSA | 86-80 | W | -220 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 43 | 11 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 43 | 8 | | 8/4/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2015 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2015 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/19/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/26/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 76-80 | L | +220 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 44 | 19 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 50 | 12 | | 6/28/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 70-79 | L | +145 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 39 | 10 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 39 | 9 | | 7/2/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 86-81 | W | -250 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 31 | 10 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 34 | 14 | | 7/3/2015 | TULSA | 98-95 | W | -220 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 41 | 9 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 40 | 10 | | 7/5/2015 | PHOENIX | 91-94 | L | +145 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 42 | 8 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 38 | 4 | | 7/8/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 63-70 | L | -175 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 39 | 11 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 45 | 11 | | 7/11/2015 | @ TULSA | 67-82 | L | +175 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 42 | 13 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 41 | 5 | | 7/15/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 61-68 | L | -155 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 41 | 21 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 31 | 11 | | 7/16/2015 | ATLANTA | 72-76 | L | -140 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 38 | 16 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 42 | 15 | | 7/21/2015 | PHOENIX | 70-65 | W | +155 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 38 | 10 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 30 | 7 | | 7/22/2015 | NEW YORK | 53-59 | L | -120 | 20-63 | 31.7% | 39 | 12 | 17-66 | 25.8% | 62 | 13 | | 7/29/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 76-82 | L | +300 | 31-55 | 56.4% | 32 | 21 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 31 | 12 | | 7/31/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 88-77 | W | +175 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 42 | 6 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 37 | 9 | | 8/2/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 80-78 | W | -210 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 39 | 10 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 33 | 7 | | 8/4/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2015 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2015 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| LOS ANGELES is 41-26 (+10.8 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 7-4 (+0.9 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 25-9 (+8.8 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 3-3 (+0.5 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/29/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 76 | 148 | ATS | 35 | 31-55 | 56.4% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 7-8 | 87.5% | 32 | 2 | 21 | | | MINNESOTA | 82 | -8.5 | SU Over | 43 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 18-24 | 75.0% | 31 | 6 | 12 | 6/16/2015 | MINNESOTA | 67 | -11.5 | SU ATS | 23 | 30-57 | 52.6% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 4-7 | 57.1% | 31 | 4 | 8 | | | LOS ANGELES | 52 | 144.5 | Under | 28 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 3-18 | 16.7% | 1-4 | 25.0% | 39 | 9 | 11 | 8/12/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 71 | 158.5 | SU ATS | 29 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 5-18 | 27.8% | 8-9 | 88.9% | 40 | 5 | 7 | | | MINNESOTA | 63 | -8 | Under | 36 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 7-9 | 77.8% | 36 | 5 | 10 | 7/8/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 72 | 163 | Under | 42 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 12-17 | 70.6% | 49 | 20 | 8 | | | MINNESOTA | 83 | -4 | SU ATS | 48 | 33-61 | 54.1% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 14-15 | 93.3% | 38 | 1 | 8 | 6/17/2014 | MINNESOTA | 94 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 53 | 37-58 | 63.8% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 35 | 6 | 13 | | | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 158 | Over | 42 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 2-8 | 25.0% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 35 | 15 | 12 | 6/8/2014 | MINNESOTA | 85 | 164 | SU ATS | 42 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 19-25 | 76.0% | 50 | 11 | 14 | | | LOS ANGELES | 72 | -3.5 | Under | 37 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 41 | 11 | 16 |
|
| | |
|
Cheryl is 135-61 against the money line (+30.5 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 113-35 against the money line (+21.9 Units) as a favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 53-21 against the money line (+26.0 Units) in August or September games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 27-9 against the money line (+14.0 Units) on Tuesday as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 88-39 against the money line (+25.5 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 84-37 against the money line (+23.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 31-11 against the money line (+18.2 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 62-17 against the money line (+31.2 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 26-15 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in road games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 58-21 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 54-17 against the money line (+23.5 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 40-18 against the money line (+15.1 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 12-4 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 16-6 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 69-29 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.3, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 100-45 against the money line (+18.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 45-16 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 33-6 against the money line (+17.6 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 78-34 against the money line (+16.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 24-4 against the money line (+16.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 41-10 against the money line (+19.8 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 21-4 against the money line (+17.8 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 5*) | Cheryl is 76-31 against the money line (+19.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 22-5 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 108-39 against the money line (+35.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 88-30 against the money line (+22.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 76-22 against the money line (+30.1 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 67-16 against the money line (+32.7 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 54-16 against the money line (+19.0 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 98-38 against the money line (+27.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 73-27 against the money line (+18.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 53-18 against the money line (+16.7 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 61-21 against the money line (+19.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 40-21 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 39-24 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 71-31 against the money line (+24.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 94-48 against the money line (+21.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 59-26 against the money line (+17.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 81-32 against the money line (+29.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 108-50 against the money line (+25.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 37-15 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 75-30 against the money line (+30.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 98-47 against the money line (+23.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 5-14 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in all games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 2-9 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after a division game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 23-34 against the money line (-21.6 Units) when playing their 4th game in 7 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 66.8, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 26-29 against the money line (-21.9 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 71.5, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 5-11 against the money line (-13.9 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 71.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 2-19 against the money line (-16.6 Units) when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 66.2, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 12-28 against the money line (-20.5 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 71.8, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Brian is 89-48 against the money line (+26.7 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 74.6, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 31-10 against the money line (+19.9 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 80.7, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 47-21 against the money line (+19.1 Units) in home games in August or September games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 74.9, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 110-85 against the money line (+35.2 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.1, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 31-19 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 74.7, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 68-50 against the money line (+26.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.1, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 20-9 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 77.0, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 31-15 against the money line (+15.8 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 77.3, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 32-9 against the money line (+18.3 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 80.6, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 43-21 against the money line (+20.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 77.5, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 26-11 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 77.8, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 20-10 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 76.8, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 18-3 against the money line (+14.2 Units) in home games after playing a game as a road favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 75.0, OPPONENT 65.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 59-31 against the money line (+18.4 Units) in home games after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 72.8, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 34-14 against the money line (+15.9 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive road games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.7, OPPONENT 68.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 18-8 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in home games after playing 3 consecutive road games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 75.6, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 27-9 against the money line (+15.0 Units) in home games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 77.5, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 20-6 against the money line (+15.6 Units) in home games after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 79.3, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 56-33 against the money line (+19.1 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 74.1, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 86-70 against the money line (+20.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.4, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 129-111 against the money line (+28.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.6, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 35-30 against the money line (+17.6 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 76.7, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 74-40 against the money line (+24.5 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 75.5, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 39-21 against the money line (+15.0 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 76.0, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 85-75 against the money line (+26.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 74.3, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 35-21 against the money line (+13.4 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 73.6, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 80 times, while the home underdog won straight up 49 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 10 times, while the home underdog won straight up 10 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 07/18/2015 - Seimone Augustus expected to miss a month ( Knee ) | |
| [G] 08/02/2015 - Erin Phillips "?" Tuesday vs. Min Lynx ( Leg ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/7/2024 7:36:07 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|