| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
MINNESOTA
First Half Results
LOS ANGELES |
|
|
75
| 35
Final
39 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 655 | MINNESOTA | -1.5 | | 656 | LOS ANGELES | 74.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | | |
|
 - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent against opponent after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite.
(129-79 since 1997.) (62%, +42.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite.
(104-60 since 1997.) (63.4%, +38 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points.
(232-160 since 1997.) (59.2%, +56 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, in August or September games.
(84-44 since 1997.) (65.6%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, in August or September games.
(63-30 since 1997.) (67.7%, +30 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(43-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(114-67 since 1997.) (63%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(141-84 since 1997.) (62.7%, +48.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(52-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +28.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(30-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(42-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +28.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(25-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.3%, +19.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(28-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +20.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(36-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +26.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - average defensive team (65-72 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 80 points or more.
(24-6 since 1997.) (80%, +17.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(155-102 since 1997.) (60.3%, +42.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(35-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +24 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents.
(982-765 since 1997.) (56.2%, +140.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(148-94 since 1997.) (61.2%, +44.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(128-71 since 1997.) (64.3%, +49.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(90-54 since 1997.) (62.5%, +30.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(128-71 since 1997.) (64.3%, +49.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(128-71 since 1997.) (64.3%, +49.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(90-54 since 1997.) (62.5%, +30.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(90-54 since 1997.) (62.5%, +30.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(467-323 since 1997.) (59.1%, +111.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(352-229 since 1997.) (60.6%, +100.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG).
(122-74 since 1997.) (62.2%, +40.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games.
(81-40 since 1997.) (66.9%, +37 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after one or more consecutive overs, an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG).
(68-32 since 1997.) (68%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after one or more consecutive overs, an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games.
(44-18 since 1997.) (71%, +24.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(528-395 since 1997.) (57.2%, +93.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record.
(190-124 since 1997.) (60.5%, +53.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(133-83 since 1997.) (61.6%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(802-574 since 1997.) (58.3%, +170.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(364-258 since 1997.) (58.5%, +80.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(114-67 since 1997.) (63%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a win against a division rival.
(231-150 since 1997.) (60.6%, +66 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road win.
(145-84 since 1997.) (63.3%, +52.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win.
(170-105 since 1997.) (61.8%, +54.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points.
(594-439 since 1997.) (57.5%, +111.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record.
(284-196 since 1997.) (59.2%, +68.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a road win.
(110-62 since 1997.) (64%, +41.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points against opponent off a road win.
(129-76 since 1997.) (62.9%, +45.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(574-403 since 1997.) (58.8%, +130.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(297-204 since 1997.) (59.3%, +72.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(107-62 since 1997.) (63.3%, +38.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a win against a division rival.
(161-102 since 1997.) (61.2%, +48.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road win.
(106-54 since 1997.) (66.2%, +46.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win against a division rival.
(66-34 since 1997.) (66%, +28.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win.
(126-66 since 1997.) (65.6%, +53.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent.
(432-303 since 1997.) (58.8%, +98.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(102-56 since 1997.) (64.6%, +40.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a losing record.
(224-141 since 1997.) (61.4%, +68.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(159-98 since 1997.) (61.9%, +51.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent against opponent off an road win where they scored 85 or more points.
(34-11 since 1997.) (75.6%, +21.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent.
(631-445 since 1997.) (58.6%, +141.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(406-292 since 1997.) (58.2%, +84.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents.
(982-765 since 1997.) (56.2%, +140.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents, off a road win against a division rival.
(118-61 since 1997.) (65.9%, +50.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents, off a road win.
(159-92 since 1997.) (63.3%, +57.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days, with a winning record on the season.
(127-79 since 1997.) (61.7%, +40.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(58-29 since 1997.) (66.7%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(643-479 since 1997.) (57.3%, +116.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(77-41 since 1997.) (65.3%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(57-27 since 1997.) (67.9%, +27.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(55-27 since 1997.) (67.1%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(71-32 since 1997.) (68.9%, +35.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(57-27 since 1997.) (67.9%, +27.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(57-27 since 1997.) (67.9%, +27.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(467-323 since 1997.) (59.1%, +111.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(352-229 since 1997.) (60.6%, +100.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(310-209 since 1997.) (59.7%, +80.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(137-75 since 1997.) (64.6%, +54.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(411-297 since 1997.) (58.1%, +84.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(273-183 since 1997.) (59.9%, +71.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(112-69 since 1997.) (61.9%, +36.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(351-243 since 1997.) (59.1%, +83.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning record on the season.
(317-220 since 1997.) (59%, +75 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(140-81 since 1997.) (63.3%, +50.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games.
(272-183 since 1997.) (59.8%, +70.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning record on the season.
(259-173 since 1997.) (60%, +68.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(118-60 since 1997.) (66.3%, +52 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(82-42 since 1997.) (66.1%, +35.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season.
(708-524 since 1997.) (57.5%, +131.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(474-348 since 1997.) (57.7%, +91.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a road win against a division rival.
(163-95 since 1997.) (63.2%, +58.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a road win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season.
(93-48 since 1997.) (66%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a road win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(64-27 since 1997.) (70.3%, +34.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a road win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(39-16 since 1997.) (70.9%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival.
(494-368 since 1997.) (57.3%, +89.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season.
(282-200 since 1997.) (58.5%, +62 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(51-24 since 1997.) (68%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season.
(56-27 since 1997.) (67.5%, +26.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a road win.
(308-198 since 1997.) (60.9%, +90.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season.
(176-102 since 1997.) (63.3%, +63.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(113-56 since 1997.) (66.9%, +51.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game.
(214-146 since 1997.) (59.4%, +53.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after a win by 6 points or less.
(37-12 since 1997.) (75.5%, +23.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(774-568 since 1997.) (57.7%, +149.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(392-262 since 1997.) (59.9%, +103.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(260-163 since 1997.) (61.5%, +80.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(160-103 since 1997.) (60.8%, +46.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season.
(230-140 since 1997.) (62.2%, +76 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(149-88 since 1997.) (62.9%, +52.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(817-588 since 1997.) (58.1%, +170.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(470-324 since 1997.) (59.2%, +113.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(306-207 since 1997.) (59.6%, +78.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins against opponent after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(213-140 since 1997.) (60.3%, +59 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(332-232 since 1997.) (58.9%, +76.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins.
(262-178 since 1997.) (59.5%, +66.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(215-143 since 1997.) (60.1%, +57.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(306-213 since 1997.) (59%, +71.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| MINNESOTA | 79 | | 39 | | 30-66 | 45.6% | 5-12 | 37.4% | 14-17 | 83.3% | 41 | 8 | 11 | | LOS ANGELES | 73 | | 36 | | 28-65 | 43.8% | 5-15 | 31.2% | 12-14 | 84.0% | 39 | 7 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA covered the first half line 579 times, while LOS ANGELES covered the first half line 421 times.
Edge against first half line=MINNESOTA | In 1000 simulated games, 561 games went over first half total, while 439 games went under first half total.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 18-8 against the 1rst half line (+9.2 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.7, OPPONENT 36.4 | MINNESOTA is 135-103 against the 1rst half line (+21.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.1, OPPONENT 38.6 | LOS ANGELES is 42-64 against the 1rst half line (-28.4 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 39.0 | LOS ANGELES is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.8, OPPONENT 39.6 | LOS ANGELES is 7-20 against the 1rst half line (-15.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.1, OPPONENT 42.7 |
|
MINNESOTA is 15-5 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.9, OPPONENT 42.5 | MINNESOTA is 15-5 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 44.8, OPPONENT 39.4 | MINNESOTA is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.8, OPPONENT 43.9 | MINNESOTA is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.2, OPPONENT 42.4 | MINNESOTA is 24-14 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.1, OPPONENT 41.8 | MINNESOTA is 14-4 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.1, OPPONENT 42.1 | LOS ANGELES is 55-30 OVER (+22.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.1, OPPONENT 38.7 | LOS ANGELES is 19-7 OVER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.1, OPPONENT 42.7 | LOS ANGELES is 190-98 OVER (+82.2 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.2, OPPONENT 38.9 |
|
MINNESOTA is 97-71 UNDER (+18.9 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.8, OPPONENT 35.4 | MINNESOTA is 109-75 UNDER (+26.5 Units) the 1rst half total when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.3, OPPONENT 35.9 | LOS ANGELES is 98-59 UNDER (+33.1 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 34.3 |
|
| | |
|
| MINNESOTA | -1.5 | | | LOS ANGELES | | |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.6, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 73-110 against the 1rst half line (-48.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.9, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.6, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.3, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 137-102 UNDER (+24.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.8, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 56-33 UNDER (+19.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.9, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 35-20 UNDER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.6, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 64-43 UNDER (+16.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.9, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 55-26 UNDER (+26.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.3, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 80-47 UNDER (+28.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.6, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 106-69 UNDER (+30.1 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.4, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 154-100 UNDER (+44.0 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.5, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 61-38 UNDER (+19.2 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.3, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 134-93 UNDER (+31.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.1, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 194-134 UNDER (+46.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.9, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 185-128 UNDER (+44.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.8, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 274-187 UNDER (+68.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.5, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 25-12 UNDER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.8, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 74-44 UNDER (+25.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.3, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 82-50 UNDER (+27.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.0, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 116-69 UNDER (+40.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.9, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 117-85 UNDER (+23.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.2, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 117-83 UNDER (+25.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.0, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 199-156 UNDER (+27.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 81-56 UNDER (+19.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.1, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 59-33 UNDER (+22.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.7, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 74-51 UNDER (+17.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 66-45 UNDER (+16.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.2, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 124-78 UNDER (+38.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 166-128 UNDER (+25.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.7, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 11-2 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.7, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.6, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.7, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 70.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.4, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 7-17 against the 1rst half line (-11.7 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.3, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 24-47 against the 1rst half line (-27.7 Units) off a road win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.6, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 80-112 against the 1rst half line (-43.2 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.1, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 11-26 against the 1rst half line (-17.6 Units) off an road win where they scored 85 or more points since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.6, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 45-71 against the 1rst half line (-33.1 Units) off a road win since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.2, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 35-55 against the 1rst half line (-25.5 Units) after a win by 6 points or less since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.5, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 79-107 against the 1rst half line (-38.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.7, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 34-53 against the 1rst half line (-24.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.3, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 115-155 against the 1rst half line (-55.5 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.0, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 122-167 against the 1rst half line (-61.7 Units) after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.5, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 129-169 against the 1rst half line (-56.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.4, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 71-97 against the 1rst half line (-35.7 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.8, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 90-63 against the 1rst half line (+20.7 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.3, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 29-15 against the 1rst half line (+12.5 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.5, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total as a road favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.3, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total as a road favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.5, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 20-9 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.8, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 20-9 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.8, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 17-6 OVER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 70.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.1, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 10-1 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.5, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.1, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.6, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.0, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.6, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.6, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 332-242 UNDER (+65.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.9, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 108-71 UNDER (+29.9 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.9, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 69-41 UNDER (+23.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing with 2 days rest since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.6, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 220-148 UNDER (+57.2 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.7, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 209-148 UNDER (+46.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.7, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 164-124 UNDER (+27.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.1, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 59-29 UNDER (+27.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 4th game in 7 days since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 32.4, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 129-80 UNDER (+41.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.6, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 167-108 UNDER (+48.2 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.1, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 73-45 UNDER (+23.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.1, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 126-74 UNDER (+44.6 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.2, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 80-48 UNDER (+27.2 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.6, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 95-56 UNDER (+33.4 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 16-5 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.8, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 115-72 UNDER (+35.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.1, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 52-32 UNDER (+16.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.3, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 22-8 UNDER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.3, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 141-107 UNDER (+23.3 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.4, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a win by 6 points or less over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.2, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 142-108 UNDER (+23.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.4, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road favorite this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.5, OPPONENT 30.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.5, OPPONENT 30.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 13-3 UNDER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they had 2 or less steals since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 33.9, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 88-48 UNDER (+35.2 Units) the 1rst half total after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.1, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 33-20 UNDER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.7, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 61-35 UNDER (+22.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.1, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 76-48 UNDER (+23.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.6, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 357-300 UNDER (+27.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 237-193 UNDER (+24.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 232-181 UNDER (+32.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.5, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 132-98 UNDER (+24.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 85-59 UNDER (+20.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 4th game in 7 days since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 179-132 UNDER (+33.8 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.4, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 118-89 UNDER (+20.1 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 114-82 UNDER (+23.8 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.7, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 61-39 UNDER (+18.1 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.7, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 91-66 UNDER (+18.4 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.7, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 35-15 UNDER (+18.5 Units) the 1rst half total off 2 or more consecutive road wins since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.5, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 31-18 UNDER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.0, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 114-80 UNDER (+26.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.0, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 136-103 UNDER (+22.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.0, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 236-190 UNDER (+27.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.7, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after playing a game as a road favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.1, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 178-131 UNDER (+33.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.1, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 187-144 UNDER (+28.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 28-11 UNDER (+15.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a game forcing opponent to commit 8 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 15-4 | +0.8 | 11-8 | 9-10 | 78.8 | 38.1 | 45.5% | 41.7 | 70.4 | 34.9 | 40.5% | 38.8 | | Road Games | 7-2 | +1.8 | 5-4 | 4-5 | 77.1 | 37.2 | 45.5% | 40.1 | 72.8 | 37.4 | 42.0% | 38.4 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | -0.6 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 82.0 | 38.8 | 43.7% | 42.8 | 75.2 | 34.4 | 43.4% | 39.0 | | Division Games | 11-2 | +3.1 | 8-5 | 5-8 | 77.2 | 37.8 | 46.7% | 40.3 | 68.2 | 35.4 | 39.4% | 37.5 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 78.8 | 38.1 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 4-12 | 36.1% | 14-17 | 83.0% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 16 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 76.7 | 38.1 | 28-65 | 43.3% | 5-14 | 33.5% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 77.1 | 37.2 | 29-64 | 45.5% | 4-12 | 31.8% | 15-18 | 84.7% | 40 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.4 | 34.9 | 27-65 | 40.5% | 6-18 | 32.0% | 12-14 | 81.3% | 39 | 8 | 16 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.4 | 37.9 | 28-66 | 41.9% | 5-16 | 33.2% | 15-19 | 79.5% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 72.8 | 37.4 | 27-64 | 42.0% | 6-19 | 33.5% | 13-17 | 76.0% | 38 | 7 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 5-14 | -9.8 | 6-13 | 11-8 | 71.9 | 35.9 | 44.1% | 39.2 | 76.8 | 36.0 | 43.7% | 38.9 | | Home Games | 3-6 | -3.3 | 2-7 | 4-5 | 71.6 | 36.1 | 43.7% | 38.2 | 74.8 | 33.6 | 43.8% | 39.4 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2.1 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 73.4 | 34.8 | 47.5% | 38.0 | 72.2 | 39.4 | 40.6% | 38.6 | | Division Games | 4-8 | -5 | 3-9 | 6-6 | 71.6 | 36.4 | 45.0% | 38.6 | 77.3 | 36.9 | 46.1% | 36.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 71.9 | 35.9 | 27-62 | 44.1% | 5-15 | 31.8% | 12-15 | 83.7% | 39 | 7 | 18 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75 | 37.8 | 28-66 | 42.3% | 5-15 | 33.2% | 14-18 | 79.4% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 71.6 | 36.1 | 27-62 | 43.7% | 4-14 | 29.2% | 14-16 | 82.4% | 38 | 7 | 18 | 18 | 5 | 12 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.8 | 36.0 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 5-14 | 34.1% | 17-22 | 76.6% | 39 | 8 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 74.8 | 37.3 | 28-65 | 42.1% | 5-15 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 79.1% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 74.8 | 33.6 | 27-63 | 43.8% | 5-14 | 33.3% | 15-20 | 75.8% | 39 | 8 | 16 | 18 | 6 | 10 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 69.4, LOS ANGELES 70.2 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/25/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 76-73 | 42-51 | -6 | L | 72 | O | 29-64 | 45.3% | 40 | 14 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 36 | 17 | | 6/27/2015 | PHOENIX | 71-56 | 37-23 | -3.5 | W | 74 | U | 27-64 | 42.2% | 40 | 12 | 19-57 | 33.3% | 42 | 20 | | 7/3/2015 | SEATTLE | 82-57 | 34-33 | -7.5 | L | 73 | U | 33-64 | 51.6% | 42 | 13 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 28 | 12 | | 7/10/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 83-90 | 40-38 | -2 | T | 76.5 | O | 34-78 | 43.6% | 41 | 9 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 40 | 10 | | 7/12/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 66-49 | 39-26 | -9 | W | 73.5 | U | 29-70 | 41.4% | 44 | 10 | 20-69 | 29.0% | 49 | 13 | | 7/14/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 85-79 | 42-40 | -3.5 | L | 72 | O | 32-63 | 50.8% | 34 | 15 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 14 | | 7/17/2015 | CHICAGO | 84-66 | 34-34 | -2.5 | L | 76.5 | U | 33-74 | 44.6% | 46 | 10 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 47 | 12 | | 7/19/2015 | @ TULSA | 79-72 | 27-34 | -1.5 | L | 74.5 | U | 28-61 | 45.9% | 41 | 11 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 38 | 13 | | 7/22/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 77-78 | 32-35 | -4.5 | L | 72.5 | U | 29-75 | 38.7% | 50 | 16 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 42 | 15 | | 7/29/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 82-76 | 43-35 | -5 | W | 73 | O | 29-61 | 47.5% | 31 | 12 | 31-55 | 56.4% | 32 | 21 | | 7/31/2015 | ATLANTA | 86-70 | 47-29 | -8 | W | 76.5 | U | 33-77 | 42.9% | 49 | 15 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 40 | 19 | | 8/1/2015 | @ TULSA | 86-80 | 45-39 | -3 | W | 74.5 | O | 29-65 | 44.6% | 43 | 11 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 43 | 8 | | 8/4/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2015 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2015 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/19/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/26/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 76-80 | 32-26 | 3.5 | W | 70 | U | 29-66 | 43.9% | 44 | 19 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 50 | 12 | | 6/28/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 70-79 | 38-41 | 2 | L | 70 | O | 22-60 | 36.7% | 39 | 10 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 39 | 9 | | 7/2/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 86-81 | 38-40 | -3 | L | 74 | O | 31-62 | 50.0% | 31 | 10 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 34 | 14 | | 7/3/2015 | TULSA | 98-95 | 42-42 | -3 | L | 73.5 | O | 33-63 | 52.4% | 41 | 9 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 40 | 10 | | 7/5/2015 | PHOENIX | 91-94 | 46-42 | 2 | W | 76.5 | O | 33-71 | 46.5% | 42 | 8 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 38 | 4 | | 7/8/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 63-70 | 38-35 | -2 | W | 76.5 | U | 24-69 | 34.8% | 39 | 11 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 45 | 11 | | 7/11/2015 | @ TULSA | 67-82 | 31-40 | 2.5 | L | 78 | U | 24-61 | 39.3% | 42 | 13 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 41 | 5 | | 7/15/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 61-68 | 37-35 | -1.5 | W | 72.5 | U | 25-51 | 49.0% | 41 | 21 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 31 | 11 | | 7/16/2015 | ATLANTA | 72-76 | 35-35 | -1.5 | L | 75 | U | 27-62 | 43.5% | 38 | 16 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 42 | 15 | | 7/21/2015 | PHOENIX | 70-65 | 38-35 | 2 | W | 74 | U | 27-56 | 48.2% | 38 | 10 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 30 | 7 | | 7/22/2015 | NEW YORK | 53-59 | 24-31 | -1 | L | 72.5 | U | 20-63 | 31.7% | 39 | 12 | 17-66 | 25.8% | 62 | 13 | | 7/29/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 76-82 | 35-43 | 5 | L | 73 | O | 31-55 | 56.4% | 32 | 21 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 31 | 12 | | 7/31/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 88-77 | 39-39 | 2.5 | W | 80.5 | U | 32-66 | 48.5% | 42 | 6 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 37 | 9 | | 8/2/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 80-78 | 38-49 | -2.5 | L | 75 | O | 35-65 | 53.8% | 39 | 10 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 33 | 7 | | 8/4/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2015 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2015 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| MINNESOTA is 37-29 versus the first half line when playing against LOS ANGELES since 1997 | | 36 of 65 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 7-4 versus the first half line when playing against LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons | | 7 of 11 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 17-16 versus the first half line when playing against MINNESOTA since 1997 | | 20 of 33 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 4-2 versus the first half line when playing against MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons | | 4 of 6 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/29/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 76 | 148 | ATS | 35 | 31-55 | 56.4% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 7-8 | 87.5% | 32 | 2 | 21 | | | MINNESOTA | 82 | -8.5 | SU Over | 43 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 18-24 | 75.0% | 31 | 6 | 12 | 6/16/2015 | MINNESOTA | 67 | -11.5 | SU ATS | 23 | 30-57 | 52.6% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 4-7 | 57.1% | 31 | 4 | 8 | | | LOS ANGELES | 52 | 144.5 | Under | 28 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 3-18 | 16.7% | 1-4 | 25.0% | 39 | 9 | 11 | 8/12/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 71 | 158.5 | SU ATS | 29 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 5-18 | 27.8% | 8-9 | 88.9% | 40 | 5 | 7 | | | MINNESOTA | 63 | -8 | Under | 36 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 7-9 | 77.8% | 36 | 5 | 10 | 7/8/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 72 | 163 | Under | 42 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 12-17 | 70.6% | 49 | 20 | 8 | | | MINNESOTA | 83 | -4 | SU ATS | 48 | 33-61 | 54.1% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 14-15 | 93.3% | 38 | 1 | 8 | 6/17/2014 | MINNESOTA | 94 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 53 | 37-58 | 63.8% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 35 | 6 | 13 | | | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 158 | Over | 42 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 2-8 | 25.0% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 35 | 15 | 12 | 6/8/2014 | MINNESOTA | 85 | 164 | SU ATS | 42 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 19-25 | 76.0% | 50 | 11 | 14 | | | LOS ANGELES | 72 | -3.5 | Under | 37 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 41 | 11 | 16 |
|
| | |
|
Cheryl is 78-62 against the 1rst half line (+9.8 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 56-41 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.5, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 51-38 against the 1rst half line (+9.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.6, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 22-10 against the 1rst half line (+11.0 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.6, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 31-20 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.2, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 27-44 against the 1rst half line (-21.4 Units) off a road win in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.9, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 10-22 against the 1rst half line (-14.2 Units) after a close win by 3 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.7, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 23-44 against the 1rst half line (-25.4 Units) after a win by 6 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.6, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Cheryl is 40-53 against the 1rst half line (-18.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.2, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 22-35 against the 1rst half line (-16.5 Units) after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.7, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 14-25 against the 1rst half line (-13.5 Units) after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.7, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 57-72 against the 1rst half line (-22.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.0, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 53-68 against the 1rst half line (-21.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.5, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 36-54 against the 1rst half line (-23.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.0, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 26-37 against the 1rst half line (-14.7 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.7, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 37-51 against the 1rst half line (-19.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.4, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 21-9 against the 1rst half line (+11.1 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 40.0, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 58-38 against the 1rst half line (+16.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.6, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 40-19 against the 1rst half line (+19.1 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 37.8, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 54-35 against the 1rst half line (+15.5 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 37.1, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Cheryl is 43-23 OVER (+17.7 Units) the 1rst half total as a road favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 12-2 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total as a road favorite of 1.5 points or less vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.6, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 23-9 OVER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total as a road favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.7, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 63-41 OVER (+17.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.8, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 63-41 OVER (+17.9 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.8, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 52-34 OVER (+14.6 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 70.5 as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.2, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 27-15 OVER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in August or September games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.1, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 40-27 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.5, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 44-26 OVER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a division game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.5, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 18-7 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing their 3rd game in 5 days as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.6, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 29-18 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.0, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 33-22 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games off a win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.3, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 25-14 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.2, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 20-8 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.9, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 47-35 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.4, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 53-35 OVER (+14.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 41-29 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.5, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 36-21 OVER (+12.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.1, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 30-19 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.0, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 26-15 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.2, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 30-19 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.8, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 26-15 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.0, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 33-22 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.0, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 47-32 OVER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.0, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 49-35 OVER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.6, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.8, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 24-13 OVER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.5, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 49-33 OVER (+12.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.9, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 29-17 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.4, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Cheryl is 26-13 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.8, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 40-20 UNDER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.9, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 23-12 UNDER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a win by 6 points or less as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.2, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 38-24 UNDER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.8, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 58-40 UNDER (+14.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.1, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 61-46 UNDER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.0, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 45-31 UNDER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.7, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 29-15 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.2, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 38-26 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.2, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 244-136 UNDER (+94.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.1, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 123-67 UNDER (+49.3 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.4, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 119-72 UNDER (+39.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.6, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 86-52 UNDER (+28.8 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 37.0, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 79-50 UNDER (+24.0 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.8, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 46-24 UNDER (+19.6 Units) the 1rst half total on Tuesday in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.5, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 155-91 UNDER (+54.9 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.1, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 150-85 UNDER (+56.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.9, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 114-79 UNDER (+27.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.6, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 73-31 UNDER (+38.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 3rd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.7, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 40-15 UNDER (+23.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 4th game in 7 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 31.7, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 35-20 UNDER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.2, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 33-18 UNDER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.2, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 114-48 UNDER (+61.2 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.3, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 44-18 UNDER (+24.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive overs in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.4, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 90-44 UNDER (+41.6 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.6, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 80-46 UNDER (+29.4 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.2, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 107-65 UNDER (+35.5 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.8, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 79-44 UNDER (+30.6 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.8, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 56-27 UNDER (+26.3 Units) the 1rst half total double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.6, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cheryl 36.4, OPPONENT 32.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 47-22 UNDER (+22.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.9, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 79-39 UNDER (+36.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.4, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 92-48 UNDER (+39.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.3, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 33-18 UNDER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.1, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 70-47 UNDER (+18.3 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.7, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 88-55 UNDER (+27.5 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.6, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 25-12 UNDER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 37.2, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 58-35 UNDER (+19.5 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.2, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 19-6 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.1, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 66-33 UNDER (+29.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.6, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 122-65 UNDER (+50.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.1, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 30-9 UNDER (+20.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.9, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 121-56 UNDER (+59.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.5, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 58-28 UNDER (+27.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive road games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.0, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 124-65 UNDER (+52.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.2, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 116-76 UNDER (+32.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.2, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 109-62 UNDER (+40.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.4, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 57-36 UNDER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.6, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 110-72 UNDER (+30.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.2, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 83-53 UNDER (+24.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.6, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 92-66 UNDER (+19.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.9, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 142-98 UNDER (+34.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.8, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 101-67 UNDER (+27.3 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.1, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 27-13 UNDER (+12.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.0, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 40-23 UNDER (+14.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.4, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 80-51 UNDER (+23.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.3, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 124-78 UNDER (+38.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.9, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 119-70 UNDER (+42.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.3, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 188-104 UNDER (+73.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.0, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 40-23 UNDER (+14.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.1, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 66-38 UNDER (+24.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.7, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 92-61 UNDER (+24.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 136-87 UNDER (+40.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.5, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 93-63 UNDER (+23.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.3, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 67-43 UNDER (+19.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.7, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home underdog covered the first half line 71 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 57 times. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog covered the first half line 14 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 5 times.
Edge against the first half line=LOS ANGELES |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 26 games went under the first half total, while 22 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 7 games went under the first half total, while 6 games went over the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite covered the first half line 6 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 4 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite covered the first half line 2 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 2 times. | | Since 1997, 6 games went under the first half total, while 4 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 2 games went over the first half total, while 2 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
| [G] 07/18/2015 - Seimone Augustus expected to miss a month ( Knee ) | |
| [G] 08/02/2015 - Erin Phillips "?" Tuesday vs. Min Lynx ( Leg ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/7/2024 7:05:00 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|