| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
TULSA
First Half Results
PHOENIX |
|
|
74.5
| 42
Final
38 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | | |
|
 - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (PHOENIX) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(40-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.2%, +21.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (PHOENIX) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(38-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.5%, +23.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (PHOENIX) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(28-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +19.2 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals.
(68-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(51-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.8%, +29 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after failing to cover the spread in 5 or more consecutive games.
(67-33 since 1997.) (67%, +30.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - vs. division opponents, off a home loss.
(297-207 since 1997.) (58.9%, +69.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - vs. division opponents, off 2 or more consecutive home losses.
(89-45 since 1997.) (66.4%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, playing with 2 days rest.
(71-38 since 1997.) (65.1%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - off a loss against a division rival, playing with 2 days rest.
(123-75 since 1997.) (62.1%, +40.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - off a loss against a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(31-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.8%, +24.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - off a home loss, playing with 2 days rest.
(99-52 since 1997.) (65.6%, +41.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread, playing with 2 days rest.
(43-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.2%, +19.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, playing with 2 days rest.
(100-52 since 1997.) (65.8%, +42.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(59-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.8%, +34.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(59-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, playing with 2 days rest.
(51-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (68%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(80-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(43-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.2%, +29.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(32-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (78%, +22.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, playing with 2 days rest.
(116-64 since 1997.) (64.4%, +45.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(54-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.1%, +28.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 3 or more consecutive losses.
(78-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.2%, +36.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 3 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(35-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.1%, +22.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 3 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(51-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.9%, +31.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(131-78 since 1997.) (62.7%, +45.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(30-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.9%, +21.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (TULSA) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(80-35 since 1997.) (69.6%, +41.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - vs. division opponents, off 2 or more consecutive home losses.
(98-53 since 1997.) (64.9%, +39.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, playing with 2 days rest.
(138-83 since 1997.) (62.4%, +46.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - off a loss against a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(34-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.9%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - off a home loss, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(43-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.3%, +21 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread, playing with 2 days rest.
(58-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +25 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, playing with 2 days rest.
(32-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.4%, +19.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, playing with 2 days rest.
(62-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +27.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(95-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(48-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +24.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, playing with 2 days rest.
(129-77 since 1997.) (62.6%, +44.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(59-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 3 or more consecutive losses.
(88-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +37.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 3 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(37-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.5%, +23.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 3 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(53-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.6%, +29.9 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - vs. division opponents.
(982-765 since 1997.) (56.2%, +140.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(154-97 since 1997.) (61.4%, +47.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(466-336 since 1997.) (58.1%, +96.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(221-142 since 1997.) (60.9%, +64.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(154-93 since 1997.) (62.3%, +51.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(353-249 since 1997.) (58.6%, +79.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(182-118 since 1997.) (60.7%, +52.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(133-81 since 1997.) (62.1%, +43.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(406-292 since 1997.) (58.2%, +84.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 3 or more consecutive wins.
(242-165 since 1997.) (59.5%, +60.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - vs. division opponents.
(982-765 since 1997.) (56.2%, +140.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - cold shooting team - 4 straight games making <=40% of their shots.
(41-17 since 1997.) (70.7%, +22.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - poor shooting team - shooting <=40% on the season, cold shooting team - 4 straight games making <=40% of their shots.
(29-8 since 1997.) (78.4%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, cold shooting team - 4 straight games making <=40% of their shots.
(35-9 since 1997.) (79.5%, +25.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game.
(772-581 since 1997.) (57.1%, +132.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| TULSA | 73 | | 37 | | 26-71 | 36.5% | 7-20 | 35.3% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 47 | 14 | 12 | | PHOENIX | 79 | | 39 | | 28-63 | 44.3% | 5-13 | 35.5% | 18-21 | 83.1% | 43 | 7 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, TULSA covered the first half line 592 times, while PHOENIX covered the first half line 371 times.
Edge against first half line=TULSA | In 1000 simulated games, 586 games went over first half total, while 414 games went under first half total.
Edge against first half total=Over |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
TULSA is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots this season.
The average score was TULSA 40.8, OPPONENT 37.3 | TULSA is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) in road games when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 36.9, OPPONENT 39.0 | TULSA is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was TULSA 40.2, OPPONENT 37.0 |
|
TULSA is 7-17 against the 1rst half line (-11.7 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.5, OPPONENT 42.1 | PHOENIX is 14-3 against the 1rst half line (+10.7 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.1, OPPONENT 35.3 | PHOENIX is 26-16 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.2, OPPONENT 36.8 |
|
TULSA is 25-12 OVER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 39.6, OPPONENT 42.6 | TULSA is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 43.7, OPPONENT 41.1 | TULSA is 20-8 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 40.0, OPPONENT 42.2 | PHOENIX is 23-12 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 41.3, OPPONENT 38.3 | PHOENIX is 29-14 OVER (+13.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.2, OPPONENT 36.8 | PHOENIX is 20-10 OVER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 42.1, OPPONENT 37.1 |
|
PHOENIX is 107-75 UNDER (+24.5 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.7, OPPONENT 36.5 | PHOENIX is 81-31 UNDER (+46.9 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.5, OPPONENT 33.2 | PHOENIX is 117-86 UNDER (+22.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.2, OPPONENT 37.2 | PHOENIX is 110-74 UNDER (+28.6 Units) the 1rst half total in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.8, OPPONENT 37.1 | PHOENIX is 60-37 UNDER (+19.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 35.6, OPPONENT 35.0 |
|
| | | | |
|
PHOENIX is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.0, OPPONENT 30.4 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 15-6 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.3, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 18-8 against the 1rst half line (+9.2 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.5, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 13-3 against the 1rst half line (+9.7 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.5, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 44.3, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) in home games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 44.8, OPPONENT 29.5 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 10-1 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) in home games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.8, OPPONENT 30.8 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 13-5 against the 1rst half line (+7.5 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 44.0, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
TULSA is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.5, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 134-95 UNDER (+29.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.0, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 184-144 UNDER (+25.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.0, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 118-77 UNDER (+33.3 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.6, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 165-113 UNDER (+40.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.4, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 216-151 UNDER (+49.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.7, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 304-225 UNDER (+56.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.4, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 79-47 UNDER (+27.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.4, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 106-72 UNDER (+26.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.3, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 45-25 UNDER (+17.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.7, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 97-71 UNDER (+18.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.6, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
TULSA is 14-5 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) versus the first half line in all games this season.
The average score was TULSA 41.3, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) versus the 1rst half line in road games this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.5, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.5, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.9, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was TULSA 42.4, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 7-0 against the 1rst half line (+7.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more this season.
The average score was TULSA 43.6, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 3*) | TULSA is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season.
The average score was TULSA 43.5, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was TULSA 43.3, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season.
The average score was TULSA 43.5, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 25-12 against the 1rst half line (+11.8 Units) in road games after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 35.9, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 35.1, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
TULSA is 16-30 against the 1rst half line (-17.0 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 36.4, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 38-58 against the 1rst half line (-25.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 5-15 against the 1rst half line (-11.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.5, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 20-37 against the 1rst half line (-20.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 37.4, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 21-9 against the 1rst half line (+11.1 Units) as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.1, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 15-6 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) as a home favorite of 3.5 to 7 vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 44.0, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 22-9 against the 1rst half line (+12.1 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.3, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 22-9 against the 1rst half line (+12.1 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.3, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 19-7 against the 1rst half line (+11.3 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 70.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.9, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 25-13 against the 1rst half line (+10.7 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 41.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.6, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.7, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 16-5 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 44.7, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.5, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 7-0 against the 1rst half line (+7.0 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 46.7, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
TULSA is 23-11 OVER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 40.3, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 12-2 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a home loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 41.1, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 17-4 OVER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 40.5, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 3*) | TULSA is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 41.2, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 39.4, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 39.6, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 40.3, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 43.2, OPPONENT 46.2 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 16-5 OVER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3.5 to 7 vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 44.0, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.9, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 42.7, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
PHOENIX is 362-285 UNDER (+48.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.5, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 131-94 UNDER (+27.6 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.2, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 130-99 UNDER (+21.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.5, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 158-122 UNDER (+23.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.4, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 180-138 UNDER (+28.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 39.1, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 50-31 UNDER (+15.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.2, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 93-66 UNDER (+20.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.2, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 28-12 UNDER (+14.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where opponent was called for 27 or more fouls since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.9, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 88-56 UNDER (+26.4 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.5, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 48-26 UNDER (+19.4 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.4, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 54-34 UNDER (+16.6 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.1, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 39.9, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 132-86 UNDER (+37.4 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.2, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 97-63 UNDER (+27.7 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.5, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 68-43 UNDER (+20.7 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.6, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 86-44 UNDER (+37.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.5, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 60-38 UNDER (+18.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a win by 6 points or less since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.6, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 180-131 UNDER (+35.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.7, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 91-63 UNDER (+21.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.9, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 198-135 UNDER (+49.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.9, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 10-10 | +1.2 | 10-8 | 8-12 | 77.6 | 41.2 | 38.4% | 45.2 | 76.1 | 36.9 | 43.9% | 41.5 | | Road Games | 4-6 | -0.1 | 6-3 | 5-5 | 76.2 | 39.5 | 37.7% | 45.0 | 78.6 | 39.6 | 45.2% | 44.8 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -6.6 | 0-5 | 1-4 | 69.0 | 37.6 | 33.8% | 46.4 | 76.8 | 34.6 | 45.0% | 41.8 | | Division Games | 6-8 | -1.3 | 7-7 | 4-10 | 75.7 | 38.9 | 38.0% | 45.4 | 75.1 | 34.8 | 43.7% | 41.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 77.6 | 41.2 | 27-70 | 38.4% | 7-20 | 34.1% | 17-22 | 77.9% | 45 | 12 | 14 | 20 | 7 | 11 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 74.7 | 37.5 | 28-66 | 42.2% | 5-15 | 32.8% | 14-18 | 78.6% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 76.2 | 39.5 | 27-72 | 37.7% | 6-20 | 32.8% | 15-20 | 74.0% | 45 | 14 | 14 | 21 | 6 | 11 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.1 | 36.9 | 28-63 | 43.9% | 5-14 | 33.2% | 16-20 | 79.5% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 22 | 6 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 74.8 | 37.1 | 28-64 | 43.2% | 5-14 | 33.3% | 15-18 | 80.4% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.6 | 39.6 | 29-64 | 45.2% | 4-13 | 30.3% | 17-22 | 74.8% | 45 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 6 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 12-7 | +1.3 | 6-12 | 7-12 | 76.9 | 37.0 | 43.3% | 40.4 | 73.2 | 35.4 | 39.5% | 44.6 | | Home Games | 7-2 | +2.6 | 2-6 | 3-6 | 79.8 | 38.8 | 45.7% | 41.6 | 72.6 | 34.6 | 37.3% | 45.7 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1.8 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 75.2 | 35.4 | 44.4% | 39.2 | 73.2 | 37.8 | 36.5% | 47.6 | | Division Games | 9-3 | +5.6 | 5-6 | 4-8 | 78.3 | 38.3 | 45.9% | 38.5 | 71.2 | 34.7 | 40.3% | 41.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 76.9 | 37.0 | 28-64 | 43.3% | 5-14 | 35.5% | 16-20 | 83.0% | 40 | 6 | 16 | 19 | 9 | 12 | 7 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75.9 | 38.1 | 28-65 | 43.0% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 78.8% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 79.8 | 38.8 | 29-64 | 45.7% | 4-13 | 32.5% | 17-20 | 85.2% | 42 | 7 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 7 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.2 | 35.4 | 27-69 | 39.5% | 5-15 | 33.6% | 14-17 | 79.1% | 45 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 74.4 | 37.2 | 27-65 | 42.1% | 5-15 | 32.5% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 72.6 | 34.6 | 27-73 | 37.3% | 5-17 | 31.6% | 13-17 | 78.0% | 46 | 11 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: TULSA 71, PHOENIX 69.1 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/26/2015 | NEW YORK | 71-62 | 45-41 | -5 | L | 74.5 | O | 21-62 | 33.9% | 34 | 13 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 44 | 26 | | 6/28/2015 | SEATTLE | 93-89 | 45-42 | -7 | L | 74 | O | 29-65 | 44.6% | 43 | 13 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 30 | 9 | | 6/30/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 69-74 | 40-32 | -1.5 | W | 74 | U | 23-65 | 35.4% | 43 | 10 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 42 | 9 | | 7/2/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 55-86 | 29-47 | 4 | L | 73.5 | O | 20-71 | 28.2% | 43 | 13 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 43 | 13 | | 7/3/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 95-98 | 42-42 | 3 | W | 73.5 | O | 32-71 | 45.1% | 40 | 10 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 41 | 9 | | 7/7/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 85-75 | 48-41 | 2.5 | W | 75 | O | 25-63 | 39.7% | 48 | 18 | 31-80 | 38.7% | 54 | 17 | | 7/11/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 82-67 | 40-31 | -2.5 | W | 78 | U | 26-69 | 37.7% | 41 | 5 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 42 | 13 | | 7/15/2015 | @ INDIANA | 80-83 | 45-52 | 1.5 | L | 79 | O | 30-75 | 40.0% | 48 | 12 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 50 | 13 | | 7/17/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 58-65 | 35-32 | -2.5 | W | 74.5 | U | 21-68 | 30.9% | 45 | 11 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 54 | 15 | | 7/19/2015 | MINNESOTA | 72-79 | 34-27 | 1.5 | W | 74.5 | U | 25-64 | 39.1% | 38 | 13 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 41 | 11 | | 7/21/2015 | WASHINGTON | 69-76 | 40-38 | -2 | T | 74 | O | 23-73 | 31.5% | 60 | 14 | 25-56 | 44.6% | 31 | 8 | | 7/30/2015 | PHOENIX | 66-78 | 40-31 | 1 | W | 75.5 | U | 21-72 | 29.2% | 46 | 12 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 40 | 16 | | 8/1/2015 | MINNESOTA | 80-86 | 39-45 | 3 | L | 74.5 | O | 25-63 | 39.7% | 43 | 8 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 43 | 11 | | 8/4/2015 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/15/2015 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2015 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/25/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 71-76 | 27-32 | -1.5 | L | 73 | U | 27-74 | 36.5% | 37 | 10 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 54 | 19 | | 6/27/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 56-71 | 23-37 | 3.5 | L | 74 | U | 19-57 | 33.3% | 42 | 20 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 40 | 12 | | 6/30/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 85-78 | 43-32 | -6 | W | 73.5 | O | 34-57 | 59.6% | 32 | 11 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 32 | 10 | | 7/2/2015 | TULSA | 86-55 | 47-29 | -4 | W | 73.5 | O | 35-63 | 55.6% | 43 | 13 | 20-71 | 28.2% | 43 | 13 | | 7/5/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 94-91 | 42-46 | -2 | L | 76.5 | O | 34-67 | 50.7% | 38 | 4 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 42 | 8 | | 7/10/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 94-79 | 46-34 | -4.5 | W | 72.5 | O | 37-71 | 52.1% | 39 | 10 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 32 | 15 | | 7/12/2015 | SEATTLE | 70-60 | 41-27 | -8.5 | W | 74 | U | 25-61 | 41.0% | 44 | 13 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 37 | 12 | | 7/14/2015 | ATLANTA | 80-71 | 38-48 | -6 | L | 75 | O | 26-57 | 45.6% | 41 | 10 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 39 | 14 | | 7/18/2015 | NEW YORK | 73-75 | 37-36 | -3.5 | L | 73.5 | U | 28-65 | 43.1% | 36 | 12 | 25-77 | 32.5% | 61 | 9 | | 7/21/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 65-70 | 35-38 | -2 | L | 74 | U | 27-60 | 45.0% | 30 | 7 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 38 | 10 | | 7/28/2015 | CHICAGO | 89-87 | 31-44 | -2 | L | 79 | U | 32-70 | 45.7% | 43 | 13 | 33-86 | 38.4% | 53 | 12 | | 7/30/2015 | @ TULSA | 78-66 | 31-40 | -1 | L | 75.5 | U | 28-54 | 51.9% | 40 | 16 | 21-72 | 29.2% | 46 | 12 | | 8/2/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 71-68 | 43-31 | -3 | W | 77 | U | 21-57 | 36.8% | 47 | 14 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 40 | 12 | | 8/4/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2015 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2015 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2015 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| PHOENIX is 29-22 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA since 1997 | | 28 of 50 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| PHOENIX is 5-5 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA over the last 3 seasons | | 6 of 10 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| PHOENIX is 15-11 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA since 1997 | | 14 of 25 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| PHOENIX is 5-0 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 5 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/30/2015 | PHOENIX | 78 | -2 | SU ATS | 31 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 40 | 2 | 16 | | | TULSA | 66 | 153.5 | Under | 40 | 21-72 | 29.2% | 6-22 | 27.3% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 46 | 9 | 12 | 7/2/2015 | TULSA | 55 | 149.5 | Under | 29 | 20-71 | 28.2% | 4-22 | 18.2% | 11-17 | 64.7% | 43 | 15 | 13 | | | PHOENIX | 86 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 47 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 43 | 3 | 13 | 6/29/2014 | PHOENIX | 80 | -4.5 | SU Under | 31 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 28-31 | 90.3% | 33 | 3 | 13 | | | TULSA | 77 | 165 | ATS | 37 | 24-77 | 31.2% | 5-21 | 23.8% | 24-25 | 96.0% | 50 | 18 | 12 | 6/20/2014 | TULSA | 80 | 163 | ATS | 38 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 2-18 | 11.1% | 16-22 | 72.7% | 54 | 20 | 5 | | | PHOENIX | 91 | -11.5 | SU Over | 45 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 5-9 | 55.6% | 18-21 | 85.7% | 35 | 9 | 8 | 6/6/2014 | PHOENIX | 78 | -5.5 | Over | 33 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 1-7 | 14.3% | 29-34 | 85.3% | 33 | 10 | 15 | | | TULSA | 94 | 162.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 20-26 | 76.9% | 42 | 14 | 14 | 5/30/2014 | TULSA | 78 | 160 | Over | 36 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 9-24 | 37.5% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 32 | 8 | 17 | | | PHOENIX | 100 | -9 | SU ATS | 47 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 10-15 | 66.7% | 34-39 | 87.2% | 38 | 9 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Fred is 13-5 against the 1rst half line (+7.5 Units) in road games vs. division opponents as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.7, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 18-7 against the 1rst half line (+10.3 Units) in road games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 39.8, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 22-9 against the 1rst half line (+12.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 39.4, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Fred is 5-15 against the 1rst half line (-11.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.5, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 21-9 against the 1rst half line (+11.1 Units) as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.1, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 15-6 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) as a home favorite of 3.5 to 7 vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 44.0, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 22-9 against the 1rst half line (+12.1 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.3, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 22-9 against the 1rst half line (+12.1 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.3, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 19-7 against the 1rst half line (+11.3 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 70.5 as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.9, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 25-13 against the 1rst half line (+10.7 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 41.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.6, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.7, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 16-5 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 44.7, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.5, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 7-0 against the 1rst half line (+7.0 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 46.7, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.0, OPPONENT 30.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 15-6 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.3, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 18-8 against the 1rst half line (+9.2 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.5, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 13-3 against the 1rst half line (+9.7 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.5, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 44.3, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) in home games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 44.8, OPPONENT 29.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 10-1 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) in home games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.8, OPPONENT 30.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 13-5 against the 1rst half line (+7.5 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 44.0, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Fred is 23-11 OVER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 40.3, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 41-21 OVER (+17.9 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 39.3, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 33-18 OVER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 39.6, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 25-10 OVER (+14.0 Units) the 1rst half total double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 39.8, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 17-4 OVER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 40.5, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 41.2, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 39.4, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 21-6 OVER (+14.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a loss by 6 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 39.0, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 40.3, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 43.2, OPPONENT 46.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 26-12 OVER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 38.1, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 16-5 OVER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3.5 to 7 vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 44.0, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games vs. division opponents as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.9, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 42.7, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 28 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 26 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 4 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 4 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 29 games went under the first half total, while 25 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 7 games went over the first half total, while 6 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 10 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 5 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 3 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 1 times. | | Since 1997, 8 games went under the first half total, while 7 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 2 games went over the first half total, while 2 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [G] 08/04/2015 - Marta Xargay Casademont doubtful Tuesday vs. Tulsa Shock ( Ankle ) | | [G] 06/04/2015 - Diana Taurasi out for season ( Personal ) | | [G] 06/04/2015 - Eshaya Murphy out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/18/2024 9:48:10 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|