| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
TULSA PHOENIX |
|
| 151.5 | 84 Final 87 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
657 | TULSA | +300 | 658 | PHOENIX | -400 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (93-61 since 1997.) (60.4%, +44 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (67-43 since 1997.) (60.9%, +36.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (67-43 since 1997.) (60.9%, +36.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (67-43 since 1997.) (60.9%, +36.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - poor shooting team (38-40.5%) against an good defensive team (38-40.5%), after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (36-7 since 1997.) (83.7%, +25.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (79-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.4%, +38 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (81-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.3%, +18.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a close win by 3 points or less. (36-16 since 1997.) (69.2%, +20.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (58-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +31.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (58-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +31.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (58-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +31.1 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
TULSA | 73 | | 26-71 | 36.5% | 7-20 | 35.3% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 47 | 14 | 12 | PHOENIX | 79 | | 28-63 | 44.3% | 5-13 | 35.5% | 18-21 | 83.1% | 43 | 7 | 12 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, PHOENIX won the game straight up 622 times, while TULSA won 356 times. Edge against the money line=TULSA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
PHOENIX is 86-98 against the money line (-43.7 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 75.5, OPPONENT 75.7 |
|
TULSA is 19-43 against the money line (-24.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 79.3, OPPONENT 82.8 | TULSA is 7-29 against the money line (-25.1 Units) when they make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was TULSA 72.5, OPPONENT 82.5 | TULSA is 5-17 against the money line (-12.9 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 76.0, OPPONENT 79.7 | TULSA is 5-29 against the money line (-22.2 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was TULSA 75.3, OPPONENT 85.5 | TULSA is 8-22 against the money line (-15.9 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 75.8, OPPONENT 80.5 | TULSA is 13-40 against the money line (-23.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 81.9, OPPONENT 87.6 | TULSA is 2-13 against the money line (-11.9 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 75.0, OPPONENT 80.5 | PHOENIX is 12-1 against the money line (+12.8 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.0, OPPONENT 70.0 | PHOENIX is 9-2 against the money line (+8.0 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.1, OPPONENT 73.6 | PHOENIX is 18-6 against the money line (+14.7 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 78.8, OPPONENT 72.7 | PHOENIX is 22-6 against the money line (+13.0 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.6, OPPONENT 73.8 | PHOENIX is 18-3 against the money line (+15.2 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.9, OPPONENT 75.2 | PHOENIX is 9-3 against the money line (+7.6 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 77.6, OPPONENT 70.5 | PHOENIX is 14-3 against the money line (+11.0 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 79.6, OPPONENT 73.3 | PHOENIX is 9-1 against the money line (+8.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was PHOENIX 84.9, OPPONENT 75.5 | PHOENIX is 23-7 against the money line (+13.4 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.2, OPPONENT 75.6 |
|
| | |
|
TULSA is 9-22 against the money line (-13.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 78.7, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 3-13 against the money line (-11.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 77.1, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 11-37 against the money line (-23.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997. The average score was TULSA 77.4, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 10-25 against the money line (-16.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 77.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 6-17 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 75.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 10-23 against the money line (-14.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 78.4, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 2-9 against the money line (-7.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was TULSA 73.8, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 12-2 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.6, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 18-4 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.5, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 17-3 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 25-3 against the money line (+21.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.6, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 7*) | PHOENIX is 36-10 against the money line (+19.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.6, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 23-2 against the money line (+21.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 84.1, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 7*) | PHOENIX is 33-7 against the money line (+22.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.7, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 4*) | PHOENIX is 28-3 against the money line (+24.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.4, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 7*) | PHOENIX is 41-10 against the money line (+24.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 17-2 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.5, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 6*) | PHOENIX is 27-7 against the money line (+16.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 12-3 against the money line (+8.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 19-5 against the money line (+10.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 28-3 against the money line (+24.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.4, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 7*) | PHOENIX is 38-7 against the money line (+27.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.3, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 5*) | PHOENIX is 24-3 against the money line (+20.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.9, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 6*) | PHOENIX is 32-8 against the money line (+18.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.2, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 16-3 against the money line (+12.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.1, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 4*) | PHOENIX is 21-5 against the money line (+15.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.4, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 4*) | PHOENIX is 19-4 against the money line (+11.9 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.1, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 21-2 against the money line (+19.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 84.5, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 7*) | PHOENIX is 30-6 against the money line (+22.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.1, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 5*) |
|
| | |
|
TULSA is 11-6 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 83.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 73-86 against the money line (-36.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 75.6, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
TULSA is 14-41 against the money line (-22.9 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997. The average score was TULSA 74.1, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 18-38 against the money line (-19.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 79.0, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 8-25 against the money line (-16.6 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less since 1997. The average score was TULSA 73.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 12-49 against the money line (-37.1 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more since 1997. The average score was TULSA 75.7, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 3*) | TULSA is 3-18 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 77.0, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 8-22 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 79.8, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 47-13 against the money line (+25.3 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 44-9 against the money line (+22.9 Units) as a favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 27-3 against the money line (+18.1 Units) in home games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 84.0, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 27-3 against the money line (+18.1 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 84.0, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 24-1 against the money line (+20.3 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 84.5, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 15-2 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in August or September games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.8, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 4*) | PHOENIX is 12-1 against the money line (+10.3 Units) on Tuesday over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 84.6, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 31-7 against the money line (+20.6 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.3, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 4*) | PHOENIX is 28-8 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.6, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 16-2 against the money line (+14.9 Units) after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.2, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 6*) | PHOENIX is 21-6 against the money line (+17.3 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.0, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 4*) | PHOENIX is 10-4 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 34-14 against the money line (+18.7 Units) in home games after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 79.0, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 27-4 against the money line (+21.2 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.6, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 5*) | PHOENIX is 25-5 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 24-5 against the money line (+14.4 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 27-3 against the money line (+23.8 Units) after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.3, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 7*) | PHOENIX is 37-11 against the money line (+14.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 34-9 against the money line (+19.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.3, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 40-11 against the money line (+24.2 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.8, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 33-10 against the money line (+17.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.9, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 28-8 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 24-6 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 21-6 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 16-5 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 21-6 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.6, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 8-2 against the money line (+6.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.1, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 22-4 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.4, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 35-10 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.2, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 20-4 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.6, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 20-3 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.0, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 4*) | PHOENIX is 16-2 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.3, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 5*) | PHOENIX is 12-2 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.4, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 10-10 | +1.2 | 10-8 | 8-12 | 77.6 | 41.2 | 38.4% | 45.2 | 76.1 | 36.9 | 43.9% | 41.5 | Road Games | 4-6 | -0.1 | 6-3 | 5-5 | 76.2 | 39.5 | 37.7% | 45.0 | 78.6 | 39.6 | 45.2% | 44.8 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -6.6 | 0-5 | 1-4 | 69.0 | 37.6 | 33.8% | 46.4 | 76.8 | 34.6 | 45.0% | 41.8 | Division Games | 6-8 | -1.3 | 7-7 | 4-10 | 75.7 | 38.9 | 38.0% | 45.4 | 75.1 | 34.8 | 43.7% | 41.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.6 | 41.2 | 27-70 | 38.4% | 7-20 | 34.1% | 17-22 | 77.9% | 45 | 12 | 14 | 20 | 7 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 74.7 | 37.5 | 28-66 | 42.2% | 5-15 | 32.8% | 14-18 | 78.6% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 76.2 | 39.5 | 27-72 | 37.7% | 6-20 | 32.8% | 15-20 | 74.0% | 45 | 14 | 14 | 21 | 6 | 11 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.1 | 36.9 | 28-63 | 43.9% | 5-14 | 33.2% | 16-20 | 79.5% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 22 | 6 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 74.8 | 37.1 | 28-64 | 43.2% | 5-14 | 33.3% | 15-18 | 80.4% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.6 | 39.6 | 29-64 | 45.2% | 4-13 | 30.3% | 17-22 | 74.8% | 45 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 6 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 12-7 | +1.3 | 6-12 | 7-12 | 76.9 | 37.0 | 43.3% | 40.4 | 73.2 | 35.4 | 39.5% | 44.6 | Home Games | 7-2 | +2.6 | 2-6 | 3-6 | 79.8 | 38.8 | 45.7% | 41.6 | 72.6 | 34.6 | 37.3% | 45.7 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1.8 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 75.2 | 35.4 | 44.4% | 39.2 | 73.2 | 37.8 | 36.5% | 47.6 | Division Games | 9-3 | +5.6 | 5-6 | 4-8 | 78.3 | 38.3 | 45.9% | 38.5 | 71.2 | 34.7 | 40.3% | 41.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.9 | 37.0 | 28-64 | 43.3% | 5-14 | 35.5% | 16-20 | 83.0% | 40 | 6 | 16 | 19 | 9 | 12 | 7 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.9 | 38.1 | 28-65 | 43.0% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 78.8% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 79.8 | 38.8 | 29-64 | 45.7% | 4-13 | 32.5% | 17-20 | 85.2% | 42 | 7 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 7 | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.2 | 35.4 | 27-69 | 39.5% | 5-15 | 33.6% | 14-17 | 79.1% | 45 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 74.4 | 37.2 | 27-65 | 42.1% | 5-15 | 32.5% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 72.6 | 34.6 | 27-73 | 37.3% | 5-17 | 31.6% | 13-17 | 78.0% | 46 | 11 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: TULSA 71, PHOENIX 69.1 |
| | |
|
|
6/26/2015 | NEW YORK | 71-62 | W | -450 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 34 | 13 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 44 | 26 | 6/28/2015 | SEATTLE | 93-89 | W | -850 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 43 | 13 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 30 | 9 | 6/30/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 69-74 | L | -140 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 43 | 10 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 42 | 9 | 7/2/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 55-86 | L | +250 | 20-71 | 28.2% | 43 | 13 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 43 | 13 | 7/3/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 95-98 | L | +180 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 40 | 10 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 41 | 9 | 7/7/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 85-75 | W | +175 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 48 | 18 | 31-80 | 38.7% | 54 | 17 | 7/11/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 82-67 | W | -210 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 41 | 5 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 42 | 13 | 7/15/2015 | @ INDIANA | 80-83 | L | +135 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 48 | 12 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 50 | 13 | 7/17/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 58-65 | L | -200 | 21-68 | 30.9% | 45 | 11 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 54 | 15 | 7/19/2015 | MINNESOTA | 72-79 | L | +135 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 38 | 13 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 41 | 11 | 7/21/2015 | WASHINGTON | 69-76 | L | -165 | 23-73 | 31.5% | 60 | 14 | 25-56 | 44.6% | 31 | 8 | 7/30/2015 | PHOENIX | 66-78 | L | +105 | 21-72 | 29.2% | 46 | 12 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 40 | 16 | 8/1/2015 | MINNESOTA | 80-86 | L | +180 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 43 | 8 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 43 | 11 | 8/4/2015 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/15/2015 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2015 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/25/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 71-76 | L | -140 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 37 | 10 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 54 | 19 | 6/27/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 56-71 | L | +210 | 19-57 | 33.3% | 42 | 20 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 40 | 12 | 6/30/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 85-78 | W | -600 | 34-57 | 59.6% | 32 | 11 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 32 | 10 | 7/2/2015 | TULSA | 86-55 | W | -330 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 43 | 13 | 20-71 | 28.2% | 43 | 13 | 7/5/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 94-91 | W | -165 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 38 | 4 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 42 | 8 | 7/10/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 94-79 | W | -360 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 39 | 10 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 32 | 15 | 7/12/2015 | SEATTLE | 70-60 | W | | 25-61 | 41.0% | 44 | 13 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 37 | 12 | 7/14/2015 | ATLANTA | 80-71 | W | -550 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 41 | 10 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 39 | 14 | 7/18/2015 | NEW YORK | 73-75 | L | -300 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 36 | 12 | 25-77 | 32.5% | 61 | 9 | 7/21/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 65-70 | L | -175 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 30 | 7 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 38 | 10 | 7/28/2015 | CHICAGO | 89-87 | W | -175 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 43 | 13 | 33-86 | 38.4% | 53 | 12 | 7/30/2015 | @ TULSA | 78-66 | W | -125 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 40 | 16 | 21-72 | 29.2% | 46 | 12 | 8/2/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 71-68 | W | -250 | 21-57 | 36.8% | 47 | 14 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 40 | 12 | 8/4/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2015 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2015 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2015 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
PHOENIX is 33-15 (+21.5 Units) against the money line versus TULSA since 1997 |
| |
PHOENIX is 9-1 (+6.8 Units) against the money line versus TULSA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
PHOENIX is 17-6 (+9.1 Units) against the money line versus TULSA since 1997 |
| |
PHOENIX is 5-0 (+5.0 Units) against the money line versus TULSA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/30/2015 | PHOENIX | 78 | -2 | SU ATS | 31 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 40 | 2 | 16 | | TULSA | 66 | 153.5 | Under | 40 | 21-72 | 29.2% | 6-22 | 27.3% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 46 | 9 | 12 | 7/2/2015 | TULSA | 55 | 149.5 | Under | 29 | 20-71 | 28.2% | 4-22 | 18.2% | 11-17 | 64.7% | 43 | 15 | 13 | | PHOENIX | 86 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 47 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 43 | 3 | 13 | 6/29/2014 | PHOENIX | 80 | -4.5 | SU Under | 31 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 28-31 | 90.3% | 33 | 3 | 13 | | TULSA | 77 | 165 | ATS | 37 | 24-77 | 31.2% | 5-21 | 23.8% | 24-25 | 96.0% | 50 | 18 | 12 | 6/20/2014 | TULSA | 80 | 163 | ATS | 38 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 2-18 | 11.1% | 16-22 | 72.7% | 54 | 20 | 5 | | PHOENIX | 91 | -11.5 | SU Over | 45 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 5-9 | 55.6% | 18-21 | 85.7% | 35 | 9 | 8 | 6/6/2014 | PHOENIX | 78 | -5.5 | Over | 33 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 1-7 | 14.3% | 29-34 | 85.3% | 33 | 10 | 15 | | TULSA | 94 | 162.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 20-26 | 76.9% | 42 | 14 | 14 | 5/30/2014 | TULSA | 78 | 160 | Over | 36 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 9-24 | 37.5% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 32 | 8 | 17 | | PHOENIX | 100 | -9 | SU ATS | 47 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 10-15 | 66.7% | 34-39 | 87.2% | 38 | 9 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Fred is 11-6 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 83.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Fred is 21-45 against the money line (-22.8 Units) in road games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 75.1, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 19-44 against the money line (-23.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 75.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 11-30 against the money line (-19.2 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 77.9, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 6-24 against the money line (-17.5 Units) in road games after 2 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.0, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 3-15 against the money line (-14.4 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 73.5, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 6-21 against the money line (-14.7 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 72.6, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 3-10 against the money line (-9.4 Units) off a home loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 78.5, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 14-26 against the money line (-18.9 Units) off a loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 79.3, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 4-17 against the money line (-17.2 Units) off a home loss in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 78.5, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 11-19 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 79.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 6-21 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 77.6, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 3-18 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 77.0, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 10-21 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 78.1, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 8-22 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 79.8, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 19-34 against the money line (-27.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 33-46 against the money line (-23.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 77.9, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 5-25 against the money line (-19.9 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 73.2, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 3-13 against the money line (-12.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 77.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 8-24 against the money line (-16.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.4, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 15-38 against the money line (-22.7 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 74.3, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 11-26 against the money line (-27.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 74.2, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Fred is 22-37 against the money line (-28.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 17-30 against the money line (-29.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 77.4, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 29-44 against the money line (-32.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 78.3, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 12-27 against the money line (-20.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.4, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 21-42 against the money line (-25.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 77.9, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 6-22 against the money line (-15.7 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 75.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 47-13 against the money line (+25.3 Units) in all games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 44-9 against the money line (+22.9 Units) as a favorite as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 27-3 against the money line (+18.1 Units) in home games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 84.0, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 27-3 against the money line (+18.1 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 84.0, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 24-1 against the money line (+20.3 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 84.5, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 15-2 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in August or September games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.8, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Sandy is 12-1 against the money line (+10.3 Units) on Tuesday as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 84.6, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 31-7 against the money line (+20.6 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.3, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Sandy is 28-8 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.6, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 16-2 against the money line (+14.9 Units) after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.2, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 6*) | Sandy is 27-4 against the money line (+21.2 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.6, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 5*) | Sandy is 25-5 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 24-5 against the money line (+14.4 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 27-3 against the money line (+23.8 Units) after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.3, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 7*) | Sandy is 37-11 against the money line (+14.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 34-9 against the money line (+19.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.3, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 40-11 against the money line (+24.2 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.8, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 33-10 against the money line (+17.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.9, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 28-8 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 24-6 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 21-6 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 16-5 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 21-6 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.6, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 8-2 against the money line (+6.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.1, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 22-4 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.4, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 35-10 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.2, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 20-4 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.6, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 20-3 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.0, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Sandy is 16-2 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.3, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 5*) | Sandy is 12-2 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.4, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 12-2 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.6, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 18-4 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.5, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 17-3 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 25-3 against the money line (+21.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.6, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 7*) | Sandy is 36-10 against the money line (+19.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.6, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 23-2 against the money line (+21.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 84.1, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 7*) | Sandy is 33-7 against the money line (+22.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.7, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Sandy is 28-3 against the money line (+24.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.4, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 7*) | Sandy is 41-10 against the money line (+24.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 17-2 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.5, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 6*) | Sandy is 27-7 against the money line (+16.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 12-3 against the money line (+8.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 19-5 against the money line (+10.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 28-3 against the money line (+24.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.4, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 7*) | Sandy is 38-7 against the money line (+27.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.3, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 5*) | Sandy is 24-3 against the money line (+20.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.9, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 6*) | Sandy is 32-8 against the money line (+18.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.2, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 16-3 against the money line (+12.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.1, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Sandy is 21-5 against the money line (+15.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.4, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Sandy is 13-2 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Sandy 83.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 19-4 against the money line (+11.9 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.1, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 21-2 against the money line (+19.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 84.5, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 7*) | Sandy is 30-6 against the money line (+22.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.1, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 5*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 44 times, while the road underdog won straight up 11 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 8 times, while the road underdog won straight up 0 times. Edge against the money line=PHOENIX |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[G] 08/04/2015 - Marta Xargay Casademont doubtful Tuesday vs. Tulsa Shock ( Ankle ) | [G] 06/04/2015 - Diana Taurasi out for season ( Personal ) | [G] 06/04/2015 - Eshaya Murphy out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/18/2024 9:46:41 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|