| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
INDIANA CHICAGO |
|
| 161.5 | 82 Final 106 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
653 | INDIANA | +200 | 654 | CHICAGO | -250 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread. (150-54 since 1997.) (73.5%, +51.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread. (126-44 since 1997.) (74.1%, +44.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (93-61 since 1997.) (60.4%, +44 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (67-43 since 1997.) (60.9%, +36.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (67-43 since 1997.) (60.9%, +36.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (67-43 since 1997.) (60.9%, +36.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games. (98-63 since 1997.) (60.9%, +36 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (96-53 since 1997.) (64.4%, +34.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (57-30 since 1997.) (65.5%, +32.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (57-30 since 1997.) (65.5%, +32.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (57-30 since 1997.) (65.5%, +32.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread. (50-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.4%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (32-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.1%, +21.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season. (129-71 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +44.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (46-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (187-125 since 1997.) (59.9%, +61.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (146-88 since 1997.) (62.4%, +57.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, off a close win by 3 points or less over a division rival. (166-127 since 1997.) (56.7%, +51.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, on Tuesday nights. (97-78 since 1997.) (55.4%, +41.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record. (88-61 since 1997.) (59.1%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better. (65-31 since 1997.) (67.7%, +34.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better. (88-47 since 1997.) (65.2%, +33.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (68-44 since 1997.) (60.7%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a home win against a division rival. (27-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.5%, +22.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (79-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.3%, +36.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival. (23-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +18.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off a home win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season. (129-71 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +44.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA | 79 | | 29-67 | 43.1% | 6-16 | 37.9% | 15-20 | 76.1% | 39 | 9 | 13 | CHICAGO | 87 | | 33-69 | 47.4% | 4-13 | 28.9% | 18-21 | 85.8% | 45 | 10 | 12 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 712 times, while INDIANA won 258 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
INDIANA is 77-52 against the money line (+25.5 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 73.6, OPPONENT 71.0 | INDIANA is 8-2 against the money line (+9.4 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.7, OPPONENT 74.3 | INDIANA is 8-1 against the money line (+9.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was INDIANA 84.7, OPPONENT 75.0 | CHICAGO is 75-117 against the money line (-60.9 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 79.0 | CHICAGO is 26-44 against the money line (-30.9 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 78.4 | CHICAGO is 39-66 against the money line (-28.2 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 77.7 | CHICAGO is 42-65 against the money line (-28.4 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.5, OPPONENT 75.4 | CHICAGO is 18-46 against the money line (-29.9 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 80.3 | CHICAGO is 10-24 against the money line (-19.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.6, OPPONENT 87.5 | CHICAGO is 44-44 against the money line (-26.6 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 82.6 |
|
INDIANA is 98-122 against the money line (-70.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 76.1, OPPONENT 76.3 | INDIANA is 45-80 against the money line (-49.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.5, OPPONENT 74.9 | INDIANA is 3-18 against the money line (-15.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.1, OPPONENT 86.2 | INDIANA is 1-13 against the money line (-12.4 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.1, OPPONENT 89.6 | INDIANA is 8-17 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 71.9, OPPONENT 77.0 | INDIANA is 9-16 against the money line (-12.7 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 71.7, OPPONENT 74.0 | INDIANA is 88-95 against the money line (-41.4 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 81.6, OPPONENT 82.2 | CHICAGO is 20-5 against the money line (+13.4 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.0, OPPONENT 75.7 | CHICAGO is 12-4 against the money line (+10.3 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 78.1 | CHICAGO is 32-17 against the money line (+13.7 Units) in home games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 74.9 | CHICAGO is 23-8 against the money line (+17.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 88.4, OPPONENT 81.8 | CHICAGO is 10-2 against the money line (+8.5 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 92.7, OPPONENT 82.0 |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 7-2 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.7, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 8-4 against the money line (+8.9 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.4, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 9-4 against the money line (+7.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was INDIANA 77.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 8-3 against the money line (+7.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was INDIANA 77.4, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 10-4 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was INDIANA 78.2, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 73-58 against the money line (+16.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.8, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 32-21 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.5, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 17-11 against the money line (+8.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.4, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 6-1 against the money line (+6.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was INDIANA 81.0, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-12 against the money line (-9.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 71.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-18 against the money line (-12.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 73.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-17 against the money line (-16.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 70.6, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 12-21 against the money line (-18.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 73.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 64-65 against the money line (-34.8 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-13 against the money line (-9.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 72.1, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-22 against the money line (-15.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 112-152 against the money line (-51.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 82-131 against the money line (-47.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 14-25 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 42-93 against the money line (-39.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-12 against the money line (-9.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-25 against the money line (-17.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 8-15 against the money line (-10.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 23-15 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.2, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 17-10 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after 2 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.7, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 8-3 against the money line (+6.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season. The average score was INDIANA 77.3, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 22-13 against the money line (+11.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.6, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 7-3 against the money line (+6.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was INDIANA 78.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 12-7 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 5-1 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 81.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 9-5 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.5, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 6-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season. The average score was INDIANA 80.9, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-21 against the money line (-20.9 Units) as a home favorite of -165 to -250 since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 19-37 against the money line (-21.3 Units) on Tuesday since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 88-117 against the money line (-45.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 27-41 against the money line (-21.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 59-79 against the money line (-33.6 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 27-38 against the money line (-22.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 41-64 against the money line (-33.7 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-9 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 58-96 against the money line (-44.5 Units) after playing a home game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-10 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-21 against the money line (-21.4 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 68.9, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 3-11 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 76-82 against the money line (-37.8 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.4, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 63-63 against the money line (-33.0 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.6, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 15-24 against the money line (-18.7 Units) after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 69.6, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 33-68 against the money line (-30.5 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 70.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 2-9 against the money line (-10.1 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 68.1, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 54-98 against the money line (-39.7 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 69.3, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 27-14 against the money line (+13.5 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 11-8 | +5.2 | 8-10 | 12-7 | 77.1 | 40.3 | 42.6% | 40.2 | 76.9 | 40.3 | 43.9% | 42.3 | Road Games | 4-4 | +1.6 | 4-4 | 4-4 | 75.0 | 41.0 | 41.0% | 40.2 | 78.5 | 39.6 | 45.5% | 41.9 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 70.8 | 35.0 | 39.4% | 39.4 | 72.6 | 39.2 | 46.1% | 38.8 | Division Games | 7-6 | +3.5 | 7-6 | 8-5 | 77.1 | 40.1 | 41.7% | 41.1 | 77.5 | 40.2 | 44.8% | 41.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.1 | 40.3 | 27-64 | 42.6% | 5-15 | 36.0% | 17-22 | 76.4% | 40 | 9 | 15 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 75 | 37.8 | 28-67 | 41.7% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 14-18 | 80.2% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 75.0 | 41.0 | 26-64 | 41.0% | 7-16 | 41.9% | 16-20 | 76.8% | 40 | 8 | 16 | 21 | 8 | 15 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.9 | 40.3 | 28-63 | 43.9% | 5-15 | 30.6% | 17-21 | 77.5% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 76 | 38.2 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 5-15 | 32.5% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.5 | 39.6 | 29-64 | 45.5% | 4-14 | 30.1% | 16-20 | 77.3% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 20 | 9 | 14 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 12-8 | +0.4 | 8-12 | 13-7 | 84.6 | 41.9 | 45.4% | 43.7 | 80.7 | 39.7 | 42.9% | 42.1 | Home Games | 8-2 | +4.2 | 4-6 | 8-2 | 88.5 | 43.2 | 46.4% | 45.1 | 80.3 | 39.4 | 43.3% | 39.8 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.1 | 1-4 | 4-1 | 85.0 | 42.2 | 44.3% | 45.0 | 83.8 | 38.4 | 45.9% | 38.2 | Division Games | 9-4 | +2.1 | 5-8 | 7-6 | 84.0 | 42.1 | 44.8% | 44.6 | 76.9 | 39.5 | 41.5% | 42.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 84.6 | 41.9 | 32-71 | 45.4% | 4-13 | 30.7% | 17-19 | 85.8% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 7 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.1 | 37.9 | 28-65 | 42.4% | 5-14 | 32.1% | 15-19 | 80.0% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 88.5 | 43.2 | 33-71 | 46.4% | 4-13 | 34.6% | 18-21 | 87.5% | 45 | 10 | 18 | 18 | 6 | 10 | 8 | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.7 | 39.7 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 6-15 | 37.0% | 14-19 | 77.1% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 75.3 | 37.8 | 28-66 | 42.0% | 5-15 | 33.5% | 15-19 | 77.7% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 80.3 | 39.4 | 30-70 | 43.3% | 6-15 | 36.4% | 14-18 | 75.7% | 40 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: INDIANA 70.8, CHICAGO 70.6 |
| | |
|
|
6/26/2015 | CHICAGO | 77-83 | L | +135 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 43 | 18 | 32-77 | 41.6% | 43 | 9 | 6/30/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 92-84 | W | +170 | 31-56 | 55.4% | 36 | 19 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 31 | 10 | 7/2/2015 | WASHINGTON | 73-50 | W | +145 | 29-58 | 50.0% | 37 | 7 | 17-58 | 29.3% | 39 | 15 | 7/8/2015 | SEATTLE | 88-65 | W | -270 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 32 | 11 | 19-45 | 42.2% | 36 | 19 | 7/10/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 83-76 | W | -330 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 37 | 10 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 44 | 13 | 7/15/2015 | TULSA | 83-80 | W | -155 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 50 | 13 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 48 | 12 | 7/17/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 50-68 | L | +105 | 18-57 | 31.6% | 39 | 17 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 48 | 9 | 7/21/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 62-80 | L | -125 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 25 | 10 | 27-45 | 60.0% | 43 | 20 | 7/28/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 75-73 | W | -105 | 33-81 | 40.7% | 52 | 13 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 37 | 18 | 7/29/2015 | NEW YORK | 84-72 | W | +120 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 38 | 15 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 33 | 21 | 8/2/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 83-70 | W | -250 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 43 | 13 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 33 | 12 | 8/4/2015 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2015 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2015 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/26/2015 | @ INDIANA | 83-77 | W | -155 | 32-77 | 41.6% | 43 | 9 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 43 | 18 | 6/28/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 71-86 | L | -105 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 31 | 9 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 40 | 10 | 6/30/2015 | NEW YORK | 81-89 | L | -220 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 39 | 8 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 45 | 12 | 7/2/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 77-74 | W | -175 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 36 | 15 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 14 | 7/10/2015 | MINNESOTA | 90-83 | W | +145 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 40 | 10 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 41 | 9 | 7/12/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 96-76 | W | -360 | 38-67 | 56.7% | 41 | 10 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 30 | 9 | 7/15/2015 | WASHINGTON | 85-57 | W | -220 | 38-83 | 45.8% | 54 | 8 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 44 | 14 | 7/17/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 66-84 | L | +175 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 47 | 12 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 46 | 10 | 7/19/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 93-82 | W | -750 | 40-74 | 54.1% | 43 | 12 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 32 | 9 | 7/21/2015 | ATLANTA | 97-92 | W | -500 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 42 | 15 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 33 | 14 | 7/28/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 87-89 | L | +155 | 33-86 | 38.4% | 53 | 12 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 43 | 13 | 7/31/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 77-88 | L | -210 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 37 | 9 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 42 | 6 | 8/2/2015 | WASHINGTON | 71-68 | W | -220 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 50 | 6 | 25-70 | 35.7% | 41 | 5 | 8/4/2015 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2015 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2015 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
INDIANA is 33-13 (+13.9 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
INDIANA is 9-8 (+3.4 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
INDIANA is 14-8 (+9.4 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
INDIANA is 4-4 (+3.4 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/26/2015 | CHICAGO | 83 | -3 | SU ATS | 43 | 32-77 | 41.6% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 43 | 11 | 9 | | INDIANA | 77 | 164.5 | Under | 52 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 20-26 | 76.9% | 43 | 6 | 18 | 6/14/2015 | CHICAGO | 98 | -3 | SU ATS | 53 | 38-67 | 56.7% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 53 | 7 | 15 | | INDIANA | 72 | 155.5 | Over | 21 | 23-73 | 31.5% | 5-25 | 20.0% | 21-32 | 65.6% | 40 | 10 | 10 | 6/5/2015 | INDIANA | 72 | 151.5 | Over | 38 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 13-23 | 56.5% | 40 | 11 | 20 | | CHICAGO | 95 | -7 | SU ATS | 51 | 36-78 | 46.2% | 1-7 | 14.3% | 22-26 | 84.6% | 56 | 15 | 11 | 9/3/2014 | CHICAGO | 75 | 146 | SU ATS | 37 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 20-24 | 83.3% | 32 | 5 | 8 | | INDIANA | 62 | -4.5 | Under | 29 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 2-14 | 14.3% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 47 | 13 | 11 | 9/1/2014 | INDIANA | 84 | 147.5 | ATS | 39 | 31-87 | 35.6% | 6-23 | 26.1% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 54 | 20 | 10 | | CHICAGO | 86 | -3 | SU Over | 31 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 20-25 | 80.0% | 49 | 8 | 11 | 8/30/2014 | CHICAGO | 70 | 148 | Under | 33 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 1-8 | 12.5% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 42 | 11 | 12 | | INDIANA | 77 | -4 | SU ATS | 42 | 25-71 | 35.2% | 9-21 | 42.9% | 18-24 | 75.0% | 47 | 14 | 4 | 8/16/2014 | CHICAGO | 67 | 146 | Under | 31 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 6-13 | 46.2% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 38 | 5 | 12 | | INDIANA | 71 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 44 | 16 | 11 | 7/22/2014 | INDIANA | 57 | -3.5 | Under | 20 | 21-57 | 36.8% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 9-20 | 45.0% | 48 | 10 | 18 | | CHICAGO | 60 | 150 | SU ATS | 29 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 2-13 | 15.4% | 16-17 | 94.1% | 38 | 8 | 11 | 7/17/2014 | CHICAGO | 64 | 151 | Under | 31 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 44 | 10 | 21 | | INDIANA | 82 | -5 | SU ATS | 45 | 35-74 | 47.3% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 39 | 10 | 8 | 6/20/2014 | INDIANA | 83 | 151 | SU ATS | 40 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 1-7 | 14.3% | 28-35 | 80.0% | 52 | 8 | 14 | | CHICAGO | 75 | -3.5 | Over | 38 | 33-67 | 49.3% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 36 | 3 | 14 | 5/16/2014 | INDIANA | 71 | 140.5 | Over | 46 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 43 | 12 | 10 | | CHICAGO | 74 | -2 | SU ATS | 36 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 2-8 | 25.0% | 22-26 | 84.6% | 51 | 13 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Stephanie is 6-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 80.9, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Stephanie is 8-3 against the money line (+7.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.4, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Stephanie is 10-4 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.2, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Stephanie is 6-1 against the money line (+6.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 81.0, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 17-19 against the money line (-15.0 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.8, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 9-17 against the money line (-13.3 Units) on Tuesday as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 73.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 49-60 against the money line (-32.8 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 15-23 against the money line (-12.1 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 4-13 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 35-42 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 6-18 against the money line (-19.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Pokey is 40-43 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 14-22 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 14-36 against the money line (-28.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 72.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Pokey is 28-51 against the money line (-34.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 16-32 against the money line (-22.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 72.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 26-46 against the money line (-37.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.5, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Pokey is 62-69 against the money line (-24.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 19-35 against the money line (-24.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 73.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 28-55 against the money line (-47.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Pokey is 64-73 against the money line (-29.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 58-63 against the money line (-18.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 43-58 against the money line (-19.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 22-48 against the money line (-25.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 12-29 against the money line (-21.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 73.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 22-39 against the money line (-25.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Pokey is 62-47 against the money line (+8.2 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 204 times, while the road underdog won straight up 74 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 16 times, while the road underdog won straight up 9 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 08/03/2015 - Layshia Clarendon "?" Tuesday vs. Chicago Sky ( Back ) | [F] 08/03/2015 - Natalie Achonwa injured last game, probable Tuesday vs. Chicago Sky ( Knee ) | |
[F] 08/03/2015 - Tamera Young probable Tuesday vs. Indiana Fever ( Thumb ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/6/2024 9:14:48 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|