| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO ATLANTA |
|
| 159.5 | 98 Final 96 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
603 | CHICAGO | -165 | 604 | ATLANTA | +145 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after playing a road game, playing on back-to-back days. (166-81 since 1997.) (67.2%, +50.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, off a close win by 3 points or less over a division rival. (166-131 since 1997.) (55.9%, +47 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a win against a division rival, playing on back-to-back days. (100-40 since 1997.) (71.4%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (92-63 since 1997.) (59.4%, +37.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (92-63 since 1997.) (59.4%, +37.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (92-63 since 1997.) (59.4%, +37.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a road win, in August or September games. (55-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.1%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a road win, playing on back-to-back days. (88-33 since 1997.) (72.7%, +35.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (22-4 since 1997.) (84.6%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off an upset win as an underdog. (35-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off an upset win as a road underdog. (24-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +20.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off an upset win as a road underdog. (29-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +24.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, off a win against a division rival. (41-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.3%, +23.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off an upset win as a road underdog. (25-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +22.5 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (276-267 since 1997.) (50.8%, +81.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - vs. division opponents, playing on back-to-back days. (298-108 since 1997.) (73.4%, +80.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws. (290-278 since 1997.) (51.1%, +77 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more. (270-114 since 1997.) (70.3%, +72.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more. (250-100 since 1997.) (71.4%, +69.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (247-267 since 1997.) (48.1%, +69.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (116-101 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.5%, +36.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, on Saturday games. (56-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +31.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (179-175 since 1997.) (50.6%, +61.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, on Saturday games. (67-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.7%, +35.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game. (139-38 since 1997.) (78.5%, +58.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (191-73 since 1997.) (72.3%, +57.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (153-55 since 1997.) (73.6%, +56.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws. (159-63 since 1997.) (71.6%, +55.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more. (162-49 since 1997.) (76.8%, +54.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after one or more consecutive overs, terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season. (253-246 since 1997.) (50.7%, +53.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (136-48 since 1997.) (73.9%, +53.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more. (182-70 since 1997.) (72.2%, +53.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (143-47 since 1997.) (75.3%, +52.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season. (69-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.5%, +34.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season. (127-45 since 1997.) (73.8%, +51.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (167-67 since 1997.) (71.4%, +50 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (180-117 since 1997.) (60.6%, +46.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (98-24 since 1997.) (80.3%, +45.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (88-34 since 1997.) (72.1%, +43 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (37-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.7%, +17.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (116-42 since 1997.) (73.4%, +42.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (43-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.2%, +29.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game. (120-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.3%, +40.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (71-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.7%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team. (41-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.4%, +23.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (84-47 since 1997.) (64.1%, +35.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (72-22 since 1997.) (76.6%, +35 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in August or September games. (63-19 since 1997.) (76.8%, +34.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (64-34 since 1997.) (65.3%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (64-34 since 1997.) (65.3%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (64-34 since 1997.) (65.3%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after beating the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games. (38-21 since 1997.) (64.4%, +29 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (131-92 since 1997.) (58.7%, +28.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after beating the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games. (47-33 since 1997.) (58.8%, +28.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (161-88 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.7%, +60 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more. (147-141 over the last 5 seasons.) (51%, +46.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games. (38-9 since 1997.) (80.9%, +26.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (30-13 since 1997.) (69.8%, +26.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (45-24 since 1997.) (65.2%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games against opponent after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games. (30-19 since 1997.) (61.2%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (21-10 since 1997.) (67.7%, +21.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games against opponent after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games. (28-16 since 1997.) (63.6%, +20.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games. (32-7 since 1997.) (82.1%, +20.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (26-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +20 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a road win, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games. (23-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (88.5%, +19.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (22-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +18.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (65-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +4.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (44-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a road win, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team. (25-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.1%, +16.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (45-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +27.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (109-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +43.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (109-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +43.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (109-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +43.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (50-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +28 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (220-175 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.7%, +46.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (44-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.7%, +16.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (205-154 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.1%, +48.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team. (63-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.7%, +29.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (31-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +14.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (21-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +9.1 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO | 82 | | 31-68 | 45.1% | 4-12 | 31.8% | 17-21 | 82.6% | 44 | 10 | 14 | ATLANTA | 80 | | 30-70 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 34.8% | 16-20 | 79.2% | 43 | 11 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 555 times, while ATLANTA won 415 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CHICAGO is 8-1 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in road games when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.8, OPPONENT 74.4 | CHICAGO is 12-5 against the money line (+8.3 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 78.1 | CHICAGO is 5-1 against the money line (+8.1 Units) in road games when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 74.0 | CHICAGO is 13-3 against the money line (+9.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 92.5, OPPONENT 82.8 | ATLANTA is 8-14 against the money line (-16.9 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was ATLANTA 76.8, OPPONENT 80.7 | ATLANTA is 4-8 against the money line (-9.5 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 81.7 | ATLANTA is 4-14 against the money line (-16.6 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.6, OPPONENT 82.1 | ATLANTA is 13-12 against the money line (-19.2 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.0, OPPONENT 78.2 | ATLANTA is 2-7 against the money line (-16.0 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 76.4, OPPONENT 81.8 | ATLANTA is 14-17 against the money line (-13.0 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 82.1 | ATLANTA is 5-10 against the money line (-14.9 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 80.4 | ATLANTA is 3-12 against the money line (-10.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 89.0 | ATLANTA is 56-64 against the money line (-29.8 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 80.4 | ATLANTA is 9-16 against the money line (-16.8 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 83.5 | ATLANTA is 88-104 against the money line (-56.3 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 84.7, OPPONENT 85.0 | ATLANTA is 17-24 against the money line (-28.3 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 81.3 |
|
CHICAGO is 79-120 against the money line (-60.9 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 79.0 | CHICAGO is 40-67 against the money line (-28.2 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 77.7 | CHICAGO is 19-46 against the money line (-28.9 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 80.3 | CHICAGO is 13-25 against the money line (-17.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 87.1 | ATLANTA is 23-8 against the money line (+16.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 88.2, OPPONENT 81.8 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 6-1 against the money line (+5.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 22-9 against the money line (+13.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 31-15 against the money line (+14.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 15-30 against the money line (-23.4 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 82.4, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 27-43 against the money line (-27.7 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 82.6, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 14-18 against the money line (-13.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 40-44 against the money line (-28.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-16 against the money line (-11.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.3, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 3-12 against the money line (-14.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 11-21 against the money line (-18.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 9-17 against the money line (-19.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 19-22 against the money line (-17.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 14-19 against the money line (-13.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 41-46 against the money line (-29.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-16 against the money line (-18.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 4-10 against the money line (-7.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 13-22 against the money line (-26.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 21-27 against the money line (-26.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 14-18 against the money line (-14.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 23-24 against the money line (-15.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 9-15 against the money line (-19.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 15-18 against the money line (-18.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 13-17 against the money line (-13.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 27-35 against the money line (-25.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 34-47 against the money line (-24.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 82.4, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 49-63 against the money line (-29.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.8, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 5-10 against the money line (-14.6 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 68-71 against the money line (-33.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 36-44 against the money line (-28.3 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 20-30 against the money line (-20.4 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-23 against the money line (-17.8 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 66-113 against the money line (-58.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 18-24 against the money line (-15.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 74.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 16-25 against the money line (-14.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 117-155 against the money line (-50.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-10 against the money line (-9.3 Units) in road games vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 70.6, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 18-26 against the money line (-19.7 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 86-133 against the money line (-46.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 44-93 against the money line (-37.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 30-16 against the money line (+13.7 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 12-15 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in all games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 83-62 against the money line (-43.5 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 83-62 against the money line (-43.5 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 72-57 against the money line (-45.7 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 18-25 against the money line (-20.1 Units) in August or September games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.3, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-16 against the money line (-13.1 Units) when playing on back-to-back days since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 76.3, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 20-22 against the money line (-26.6 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 5-11 against the money line (-12.0 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.0, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 11-14 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 17-17 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 26-31 against the money line (-26.8 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-4 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in home games revenging a road loss versus opponent this season. The average score was ATLANTA 74.3, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 22-22 against the money line (-19.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 22-23 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 20-22 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 22-24 against the money line (-20.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 50-38 against the money line (-32.2 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 9-13 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-10 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 5-8 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after playing a road game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 15-18 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 4-10 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in road games when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 91-118 against the money line (-43.8 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-13 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-21 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-16 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-21 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-8 against the money line (-7.8 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-1 against the money line (+8.3 Units) as a home underdog of +200 or less over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 83.4, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 15-2 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in home games after 3 consecutive division games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 17-11 | +1.6 | 12-16 | 16-12 | 82.5 | 41.6 | 44.3% | 44.2 | 79.6 | 39.8 | 42.9% | 42.2 | Road Games | 6-8 | -3.5 | 6-8 | 6-8 | 78.2 | 40.4 | 43.1% | 42.8 | 79.9 | 39.9 | 43.2% | 43.6 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1.2 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 74.8 | 40.6 | 41.3% | 45.0 | 78.6 | 40.0 | 46.3% | 40.0 | Division Games | 12-6 | +2.3 | 7-11 | 9-9 | 82.1 | 41.8 | 44.6% | 44.2 | 77.3 | 39.8 | 41.7% | 42.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 82.5 | 41.6 | 31-71 | 44.3% | 4-13 | 31.0% | 16-19 | 83.5% | 44 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 7 | vs opponents surrendering | 74.8 | 37.9 | 28-65 | 42.2% | 5-15 | 32.5% | 15-19 | 80.1% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 78.2 | 40.4 | 30-70 | 43.1% | 3-12 | 27.2% | 15-18 | 80.7% | 43 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.6 | 39.8 | 30-69 | 42.9% | 6-15 | 36.1% | 15-19 | 77.2% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 75.3 | 38 | 28-65 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 33.7% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.9 | 39.9 | 30-68 | 43.2% | 6-15 | 37.7% | 15-19 | 78.6% | 44 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 12-16 | -10.8 | 16-12 | 16-12 | 77.5 | 38.2 | 41.3% | 43.3 | 80.7 | 39.7 | 43.7% | 40.9 | Home Games | 7-6 | -8.5 | 8-5 | 5-8 | 74.8 | 36.5 | 39.7% | 47.4 | 74.1 | 36.4 | 40.2% | 41.1 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +4.5 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 84.0 | 41.8 | 45.0% | 42.0 | 77.6 | 37.0 | 42.3% | 37.2 | Division Games | 8-9 | -8.7 | 10-7 | 10-7 | 78.2 | 38.1 | 42.3% | 43.1 | 80.7 | 39.5 | 43.7% | 39.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.5 | 38.2 | 28-68 | 41.3% | 5-15 | 33.0% | 16-21 | 78.7% | 43 | 11 | 16 | 22 | 9 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.2 | 38.2 | 28-65 | 42.4% | 5-15 | 33.4% | 15-18 | 79.8% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 74.8 | 36.5 | 27-69 | 39.7% | 4-14 | 28.7% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 47 | 12 | 17 | 23 | 9 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.7 | 39.7 | 28-63 | 43.7% | 5-16 | 33.0% | 20-24 | 82.2% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 20 | 9 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 75.9 | 38.2 | 28-66 | 42.6% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 79.0% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 74.1 | 36.4 | 25-62 | 40.2% | 6-18 | 31.1% | 18-23 | 79.7% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 21 | 9 | 16 | 6 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 70.5, ATLANTA 70.3 |
| | |
|
|
7/21/2015 | ATLANTA | 97-92 | W | -500 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 42 | 15 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 33 | 14 | 7/28/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 87-89 | L | +155 | 33-86 | 38.4% | 53 | 12 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 43 | 13 | 7/31/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 77-88 | L | -210 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 37 | 9 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 42 | 6 | 8/2/2015 | WASHINGTON | 71-68 | W | -220 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 50 | 6 | 25-70 | 35.7% | 41 | 5 | 8/4/2015 | INDIANA | 106-82 | W | -220 | 43-68 | 63.2% | 42 | 14 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 42 | 13 | 8/7/2015 | NEW YORK | 63-77 | L | -200 | 20-67 | 29.9% | 43 | 13 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 52 | 14 | 8/9/2015 | PHOENIX | 74-64 | W | -175 | 27-78 | 34.6% | 54 | 7 | 25-66 | 37.9% | 44 | 9 | 8/11/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 63-84 | L | +220 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 35 | 17 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 42 | 14 | 8/14/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 94-84 | W | -250 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 46 | 6 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 36 | 11 | 8/16/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 64-76 | L | +145 | 23-71 | 32.4% | 49 | 9 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 41 | 11 | 8/21/2015 | WASHINGTON | 87-85 | W | -220 | 37-79 | 46.8% | 49 | 15 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 34 | 12 | 8/23/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 66-64 | W | +120 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 46 | 15 | 22-66 | 33.3% | 47 | 16 | 8/29/2015 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/30/2015 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2015 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/6/2015 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/21/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 92-97 | L | +350 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 33 | 14 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 42 | 15 | 7/29/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 85-102 | L | +145 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 37 | 13 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 45 | 17 | 7/31/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 70-86 | L | | 27-64 | 42.2% | 40 | 19 | 33-77 | 42.9% | 49 | 15 | 8/2/2015 | PHOENIX | 68-71 | L | +200 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 40 | 12 | 21-57 | 36.8% | 47 | 14 | 8/7/2015 | @ INDIANA | 77-106 | L | +300 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 41 | 26 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 41 | 10 | 8/9/2015 | @ TULSA | 98-90 | W | +220 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 44 | 12 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 41 | 9 | 8/14/2015 | MINNESOTA | 82-84 | L | +280 | 30-78 | 38.5% | 41 | 6 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 48 | 14 | 8/16/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 90-77 | W | -165 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 47 | 12 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 33 | 14 | 8/21/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 67-78 | L | +350 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 41 | 13 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 43 | 16 | 8/23/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 102-92 | W | -140 | 40-67 | 59.7% | 34 | 15 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 35 | 12 | 8/25/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 71-57 | W | -330 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 49 | 9 | 19-63 | 30.2% | 40 | 12 | 8/28/2015 | @ INDIANA | 90-84 | W | +250 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 39 | 14 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 35 | 18 | 8/29/2015 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2015 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/6/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/9/2015 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2015 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CHICAGO is 22-14 (+14.3 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 10-5 (+7.6 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CHICAGO is 11-8 (+11.5 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 4-4 (+3.2 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/21/2015 | ATLANTA | 92 | 163 | ATS | 48 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 33 | 7 | 14 | | CHICAGO | 97 | -9.5 | SU Over | 44 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 28-32 | 87.5% | 42 | 9 | 15 | 6/24/2015 | ATLANTA | 96 | 159.5 | ATS | 34 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 50 | 15 | 13 | | CHICAGO | 100 | -8.5 | SU Over | 40 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 6-13 | 46.2% | 34-36 | 94.4% | 49 | 10 | 15 | 6/19/2015 | CHICAGO | 73 | -3.5 | Under | 36 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 25-28 | 89.3% | 41 | 9 | 18 | | ATLANTA | 74 | 158 | SU ATS | 37 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 1-9 | 11.1% | 13-21 | 61.9% | 51 | 10 | 17 | 8/26/2014 | CHICAGO | 81 | 158 | SU ATS | 41 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 3-17 | 17.6% | 20-27 | 74.1% | 39 | 7 | 9 | | ATLANTA | 80 | -4 | Over | 54 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 21-29 | 72.4% | 49 | 15 | 13 | 8/24/2014 | ATLANTA | 92 | 156.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 18-20 | 90.0% | 36 | 7 | 13 | | CHICAGO | 83 | -3 | Over | 43 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 23-29 | 79.3% | 39 | 7 | 15 | 8/22/2014 | CHICAGO | 80 | 154 | SU ATS | 36 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 6-13 | 46.2% | 12-14 | 85.7% | 39 | 6 | 13 | | ATLANTA | 77 | -3.5 | Over | 37 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 5-13 | 38.5% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 42 | 9 | 11 | 8/10/2014 | ATLANTA | 69 | 156 | Under | 36 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 46 | 10 | 15 | | CHICAGO | 80 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 32 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 42 | 6 | 11 | 7/25/2014 | CHICAGO | 79 | 160 | SU ATS | 43 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 1-4 | 25.0% | 22-25 | 88.0% | 34 | 7 | 24 | | ATLANTA | 75 | -9 | Under | 29 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 33 | 10 | 20 | 7/13/2014 | CHICAGO | 79 | 159 | ATS | 46 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 1-4 | 25.0% | 22-28 | 78.6% | 55 | 13 | 21 | | ATLANTA | 81 | -7 | SU Over | 42 | 29-82 | 35.4% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 20-30 | 66.7% | 60 | 21 | 18 | 6/7/2014 | CHICAGO | 59 | 160 | Under | 31 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 40 | 10 | 18 | | ATLANTA | 97 | -6 | SU ATS | 56 | 35-78 | 44.9% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 19-27 | 70.4% | 59 | 20 | 13 | 5/24/2014 | ATLANTA | 73 | 152.5 | Over | 39 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 37 | 10 | 15 | | CHICAGO | 87 | -2 | SU ATS | 41 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 41 | 10 | 16 |
|
| | |
|
Pokey is 65-49 against the money line (+8.4 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 26-20 against the money line (+10.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 32-32 against the money line (-25.5 Units) in all games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 20-22 against the money line (-26.6 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 5-11 against the money line (-12.0 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 75.0, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 11-14 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 17-17 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 22-22 against the money line (-19.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 20-22 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 9-13 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 5-10 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 12-19 against the money line (-28.1 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 5*) | Michael is 15-18 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 77.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 14-18 against the money line (-13.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 9-16 against the money line (-11.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.3, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 3-12 against the money line (-14.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Michael is 9-17 against the money line (-19.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 19-22 against the money line (-17.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 14-19 against the money line (-13.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 7-16 against the money line (-18.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Michael is 16-21 against the money line (-18.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 14-18 against the money line (-14.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 23-24 against the money line (-15.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 34-39 against the money line (-24.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 79.3, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 13-17 against the money line (-13.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Pokey is 52-61 against the money line (-31.6 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 21-26 against the money line (-19.9 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 30-39 against the money line (-23.3 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 5-14 against the money line (-11.9 Units) in road games after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 72.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 42-35 against the money line (-19.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 22-23 against the money line (-15.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 19-36 against the money line (-23.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 73.2, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 33-51 against the money line (-29.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 66-72 against the money line (-24.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 24-38 against the money line (-22.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 73.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 33-58 against the money line (-45.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Pokey is 69-76 against the money line (-28.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 28-34 against the money line (-18.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 47-60 against the money line (-18.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 24-48 against the money line (-23.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 50-20 against the money line (+25.9 Units) on Saturday games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 74.6, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 158-77 against the money line (+38.9 Units) after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.8, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 111-54 against the money line (+34.5 Units) after 2 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.1, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 85-39 against the money line (+30.1 Units) after 3 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.8, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 89-50 against the money line (+21.3 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 77.0, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 27-15 against the money line (+15.2 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 81.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 48-17 against the money line (+18.9 Units) off a road win against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 73.4, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 104-47 against the money line (+25.0 Units) off a win against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 74.1, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 51-20 against the money line (+18.5 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 74.5, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 54-21 against the money line (+21.1 Units) after a win by 6 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 73.9, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 79-24 against the money line (+36.3 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.2, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 97-67 against the money line (+19.4 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.5, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 44-30 against the money line (+16.0 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 77.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 34-22 against the money line (+14.3 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 77.0, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 74 times, while the home underdog won straight up 35 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 14 times, while the home underdog won straight up 7 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[F] 08/03/2015 - Cierra Burdick expected to miss 4-6 weeks ( Foot ) | [G] 06/06/2015 - Celine Dumerc out for season ( Suspension ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/16/2024 6:22:32 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|