WNBA ATLANTA Matchup 20150829

You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.

WNBA : First Half Matchup

Saturday 8/29/2015

Line

$ Line

OU Line

Score

CHICAGO
First Half Results
ATLANTA

-0.5

+0.5

52
Final
45

CHICAGO (17 - 11) at ATLANTA (12 - 16)

Saturday, 8/29/2015 7:05 PM

Board		First Half
603	CHICAGO	-2
604	ATLANTA	82.5

	Current First Half FoxSheets
	ATS FoxSheet
	First Half FoxSheet
	Money Line FoxSheet
	Teaser Line FoxSheet

KEY GAME INFORMATION

STATFOX SUPER SITUATIONS™

StatFox Super Situations favoring ATLANTA to cover the first half line

There are 1 situations with a total rating of 3 stars.

- Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - off a close win by 3 points or less over a division rival against opponent off a win against a division rival.
(43-15 since 1997.) (74.1%, +26.5 units. Rating = 3*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring CHICAGO to cover the first half line

There are 8 situations with a total rating of 13 stars.

- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points.
(237-162 since 1997.) (59.4%, +58.8 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, in August or September games.
(89-46 since 1997.) (65.9%, +38.4 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - after beating the spread by more than 6 points in three consecutive games.
(29-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.7%, +15.8 units. Rating = 1*)

- Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(167-107 since 1997.) (60.9%, +49.3 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(31-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.9%, +15.6 units. Rating = 1*)

- Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points.
(130-78 since 1997.) (62.5%, +44.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, in August or September games.
(58-26 since 1997.) (69%, +29.4 units. Rating = 2*)

- Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins against opponent after 3 or more consecutive wins.
(32-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.1%, +15.5 units. Rating = 1*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring the game to go UNDER the first half total

There are 108 situations with a total rating of 233 stars.

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - vs. division opponents.
(998-781 since 1997.) (56.1%, +138.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(67-35 since 1997.) (65.7%, +28.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(43-19 since 1997.) (69.4%, +22.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(151-97 since 1997.) (60.9%, +44.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(132-77 since 1997.) (63.2%, +47.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(132-77 since 1997.) (63.2%, +47.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(132-77 since 1997.) (63.2%, +47.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(479-336 since 1997.) (58.8%, +109.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(364-242 since 1997.) (60.1%, +97.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(477-345 since 1997.) (58%, +97.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(361-256 since 1997.) (58.5%, +79.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(246-171 since 1997.) (59%, +57.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(126-76 since 1997.) (62.4%, +42.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(819-583 since 1997.) (58.4%, +177.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(372-264 since 1997.) (58.5%, +81.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(145-84 since 1997.) (63.3%, +52.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(94-49 since 1997.) (65.7%, +40.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a win against a division rival.
(237-152 since 1997.) (60.9%, +69.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road win.
(148-86 since 1997.) (63.2%, +53.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win.
(174-106 since 1997.) (62.1%, +57.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points.
(609-445 since 1997.) (57.8%, +119.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record.
(292-201 since 1997.) (59.2%, +70.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(112-64 since 1997.) (63.6%, +41.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off an road win where they scored 85 or more points.
(43-16 since 1997.) (72.9%, +25.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a road win.
(113-63 since 1997.) (64.2%, +43.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points against opponent off a road win.
(133-77 since 1997.) (63.3%, +48.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, off a road win against a division rival.
(40-12 since 1997.) (76.9%, +26.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, off a road win.
(64-22 since 1997.) (74.4%, +39.8 units. Rating = 4*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a road win.
(64-33 since 1997.) (66%, +27.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(591-412 since 1997.) (58.9%, +137.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(305-210 since 1997.) (59.2%, +74 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(118-65 since 1997.) (64.5%, +46.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a win against a division rival.
(167-104 since 1997.) (61.6%, +52.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road win.
(109-56 since 1997.) (66.1%, +47.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win against a division rival.
(69-34 since 1997.) (67%, +31.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off an upset win as a road underdog.
(77-37 since 1997.) (67.5%, +36.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win.
(130-67 since 1997.) (66%, +56.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent.
(435-307 since 1997.) (58.6%, +97.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(104-56 since 1997.) (65%, +42.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a losing record.
(227-144 since 1997.) (61.2%, +68.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(162-101 since 1997.) (61.6%, +50.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(81-37 since 1997.) (68.6%, +40.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(63-30 since 1997.) (67.7%, +30 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(60-25 since 1997.) (70.6%, +32.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record.
(138-81 since 1997.) (63%, +48.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(104-59 since 1997.) (63.8%, +39.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(53-22 since 1997.) (70.7%, +28.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent.
(646-454 since 1997.) (58.7%, +146.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(75-39 since 1997.) (65.8%, +32.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - foul prone team - called for 22 or more fouls/game on the season, on Saturday games.
(42-18 since 1997.) (70%, +22.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(238-170 since 1997.) (58.3%, +51 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(412-297 since 1997.) (58.1%, +85.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins.
(245-169 since 1997.) (59.2%, +59.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, off a road win.
(53-20 since 1997.) (72.6%, +31 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents.
(998-781 since 1997.) (56.1%, +138.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog.
(102-55 since 1997.) (65%, +41.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, off an upset win as an underdog.
(139-84 since 1997.) (62.3%, +46.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, off a road win against a division rival.
(121-62 since 1997.) (66.1%, +52.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, off an upset win as a road underdog.
(95-55 since 1997.) (63.3%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, off a road win.
(163-94 since 1997.) (63.4%, +59.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(151-97 since 1997.) (60.9%, +44.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(132-77 since 1997.) (63.2%, +47.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(132-77 since 1997.) (63.2%, +47.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(132-77 since 1997.) (63.2%, +47.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(479-336 since 1997.) (58.8%, +109.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(364-242 since 1997.) (60.1%, +97.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(76-36 since 1997.) (67.9%, +36.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(101-57 since 1997.) (63.9%, +38.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(101-59 since 1997.) (63.1%, +36.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - with a winning record on the season.
(721-539 since 1997.) (57.2%, +128.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(487-363 since 1997.) (57.3%, +87.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off an upset win as an underdog.
(245-173 since 1997.) (58.6%, +54.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off an upset win as an underdog, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(68-34 since 1997.) (66.7%, +30.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off a road win against a division rival.
(167-97 since 1997.) (63.3%, +60.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off a road win against a division rival, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(51-20 since 1997.) (71.8%, +29 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off a road win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season.
(96-48 since 1997.) (66.7%, +43.2 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off a road win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(67-27 since 1997.) (71.3%, +37.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off a road win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(40-16 since 1997.) (71.4%, +22.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off a win against a division rival.
(504-376 since 1997.) (57.3%, +90.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off a win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season.
(288-205 since 1997.) (58.4%, +62.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(55-26 since 1997.) (67.9%, +26.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off an upset win as a road underdog.
(186-121 since 1997.) (60.6%, +52.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off an upset win as a road underdog, in August or September games.
(64-31 since 1997.) (67.4%, +29.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off an upset win as a road underdog, with a winning record on the season.
(86-52 since 1997.) (62.3%, +28.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off an upset win as a road underdog, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(59-27 since 1997.) (68.6%, +29.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off a road win.
(315-204 since 1997.) (60.7%, +90.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season.
(181-106 since 1997.) (63.1%, +64.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(118-60 since 1997.) (66.3%, +52 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(315-230 since 1997.) (57.8%, +62 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents.
(209-143 since 1997.) (59.4%, +51.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games.
(238-168 since 1997.) (58.6%, +53.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games.
(172-112 since 1997.) (60.6%, +48.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents.
(116-68 since 1997.) (63%, +41.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(170-103 since 1997.) (62.3%, +56.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games.
(102-60 since 1997.) (63%, +36 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, vs. division opponents.
(107-61 since 1997.) (63.7%, +39.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(792-579 since 1997.) (57.8%, +155.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a game where they covered the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(201-131 since 1997.) (60.5%, +56.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(402-269 since 1997.) (59.9%, +106.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(270-170 since 1997.) (61.4%, +83 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(163-105 since 1997.) (60.8%, +47.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a game where they covered the spread against opponent after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(183-124 since 1997.) (59.6%, +46.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(832-602 since 1997.) (58%, +169.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(480-335 since 1997.) (58.9%, +111.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(316-218 since 1997.) (59.2%, +76.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins against opponent after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(216-143 since 1997.) (60.2%, +58.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins against opponent after 3 or more consecutive wins.
(123-79 since 1997.) (60.9%, +36.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(337-240 since 1997.) (58.4%, +73 units. Rating = 2*)

STATFOX GAME ESTIMATOR™

	Projection				Shooting		3pt Shots		Free Throws		Rebounding
Teams	Score	Edge	Half	Edge	FGM-A	Pct.	FGM-A	Pct.	FTM-A	Pct.	Tot.	OFF	TO
CHICAGO	82		41		31-68	45.1%	4-12	31.8%	17-21	82.6%	44	10	14
ATLANTA	80		41		30-70	42.5%	5-15	34.8%	16-20	79.2%	43	11	13

The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total.

In 1000 simulated games, ATLANTA covered the first half line 520 times, while CHICAGO covered the first half line 442 times.
No Edge.

In 1000 simulated games, 508 games went under first half total, while 492 games went over first half total.
No Edge.

Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring CHICAGO to cover the first half line

CHICAGO is 92-45 against the 1rst half line (+42.5 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.1, OPPONENT 38.3

ATLANTA is 66-110 against the 1rst half line (-55.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.9, OPPONENT 42.5

ATLANTA is 48-70 against the 1rst half line (-29.0 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 37.9, OPPONENT 38.9

ATLANTA is 4-19 against the 1rst half line (-16.9 Units) in home games when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.9, OPPONENT 40.2

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring ATLANTA to cover the first half line

CHICAGO is 65-95 against the 1rst half line (-39.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 42.3

CHICAGO is 12-26 against the 1rst half line (-16.6 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 41.0

ATLANTA is 30-17 against the 1rst half line (+11.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 44.4, OPPONENT 39.5

STATFOX POWERLINE™

	Power Rating
	Estimate	Edge
CHICAGO	-0.5
ATLANTA

STATFOX MATCHUP POWER TRENDS™

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring CHICAGO to cover the first half line

There are 2 trends with a total rating of 0 stars.

ATLANTA is 9-18 against the 1rst half line (-10.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.6, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 40-61 against the 1rst half line (-27.1 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.4, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring ATLANTA to cover the first half line

There are 10 trends with a total rating of 4 stars.

CHICAGO is 17-33 against the 1rst half line (-19.3 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.8, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.9, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 17-30 against the 1rst half line (-16.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.3, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 20-35 against the 1rst half line (-18.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.9, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 22-36 against the 1rst half line (-17.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.5, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 14-29 against the 1rst half line (-17.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.1, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 27-42 against the 1rst half line (-19.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 22-37 against the 1rst half line (-18.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.2, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 37-54 against the 1rst half line (-22.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) in home games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 48.2, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring the OVER against the first half total

There are 19 trends with a total rating of 13 stars.

CHICAGO is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.9, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 30-16 OVER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.3, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 33-22 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 28-16 OVER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 38-23 OVER (+12.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 30-18 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 24-12 OVER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 24-12 OVER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.1, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 46.2, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 9-0 OVER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 48.2, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 4*)

ATLANTA is 26-10 OVER (+15.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 43.5, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 23-11 OVER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.8, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.3, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 20-9 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.4, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 14-4 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.4, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 30-16 OVER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.9, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 38-23 OVER (+12.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.2, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*)

STATFOX SITUATIONAL POWER TRENDS™

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring ATLANTA to cover the first half line

There are 6 trends with a total rating of 3 stars.

CHICAGO is 8-17 against the 1rst half line (-10.7 Units) in August or September games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.4, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 12-26 against the 1rst half line (-16.6 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 10-22 against the 1rst half line (-14.2 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 17-34 against the 1rst half line (-20.4 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 18-31 against the 1rst half line (-16.1 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 49-30 against the 1rst half line (+16.0 Units) after 3 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.4, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the OVER against the first half total

There are 24 trends with a total rating of 25 stars.

CHICAGO is 45-25 OVER (+17.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 26-12 OVER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.3, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 35-20 OVER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 35-20 OVER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 28-16 OVER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 70.5 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 8-0 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total on Saturday games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 45.4 - (Rating = 3*)

CHICAGO is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 29-16 OVER (+11.4 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 42-25 OVER (+14.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 43-22 OVER (+18.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 30-15 OVER (+13.5 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 3 of their last 4 games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.3, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 7-0 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games with 45 or more rebounds over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 20-8 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 18-7 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 23-12 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total on Saturday games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 44.8, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 19-7 OVER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 38.5, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 33-20 OVER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.9, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 31-17 OVER (+12.3 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.2, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 24-12 OVER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.8, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.6, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 26-14 OVER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.0, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 43.2, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the UNDER against the first half total

There are 2 trends with a total rating of 3 stars.

ATLANTA is 8-2 UNDER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive division games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 36.7, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 consecutive division games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 33.9, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 3*)

ADVANCED TEAM STATS

CHICAGO - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team				Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.
All Games	17-11	+1.6	12-16	16-12	82.5	41.6	44.3%	44.2	79.6	39.8	42.9%	42.2
Road Games	6-8	-3.5	6-8	6-8	78.2	40.4	43.1%	42.8	79.9	39.9	43.2%	43.6
Last 5 Games	3-2	+1.2	2-3	2-3	74.8	40.6	41.3%	45.0	78.6	40.0	46.3%	40.0
Division Games	12-6	+2.3	7-11	9-9	82.1	41.8	44.6%	44.2	77.3	39.8	41.7%	42.6

CHICAGO Team Statistics
			Shooting		3pt Shooting		Free Throws		Rebounding
	PPG	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	PCT	FTM-A	Pct	Tot	Off	Ast	PF	Stl	TO	Bk
Team Stats (All Games)	82.5	41.6	31-71	44.3%	4-13	31.0%	16-19	83.5%	44	10	15	18	7	12	7
vs opponents surrendering	74.8	37.9	28-65	42.2%	5-15	32.5%	15-19	80.1%	41	9	16	19	7	13	4
Team Stats (Road Games)	78.2	40.4	30-70	43.1%	3-12	27.2%	15-18	80.7%	43	10	13	18	7	12	5
Stats Against (All Games)	79.6	39.8	30-69	42.9%	6-15	36.1%	15-19	77.2%	42	9	18	19	7	12	4
vs opponents averaging	75.3	38	28-65	42.5%	5-15	33.7%	15-19	78.9%	41	9	17	19	7	13	4
Stats Against (Road Games)	79.9	39.9	30-68	43.2%	6-15	37.7%	15-19	78.6%	44	9	17	19	7	13	4

ATLANTA - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team				Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.
All Games	12-16	-10.8	16-12	16-12	77.5	38.2	41.3%	43.3	80.7	39.7	43.7%	40.9
Home Games	7-6	-8.5	8-5	5-8	74.8	36.5	39.7%	47.4	74.1	36.4	40.2%	41.1
Last 5 Games	4-1	+4.5	4-1	3-2	84.0	41.8	45.0%	42.0	77.6	37.0	42.3%	37.2
Division Games	8-9	-8.7	10-7	10-7	78.2	38.1	42.3%	43.1	80.7	39.5	43.7%	39.6

ATLANTA Team Statistics
			Shooting		3pt Shooting		Free Throws		Rebounding
	PPG	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	PCT	FTM-A	Pct	Tot	Off	Ast	PF	Stl	TO	Bk
Team Stats (All Games)	77.5	38.2	28-68	41.3%	5-15	33.0%	16-21	78.7%	43	11	16	22	9	16	4
vs opponents surrendering	75.2	38.2	28-65	42.4%	5-15	33.4%	15-18	79.8%	41	9	16	19	7	13	4
Team Stats (Home Games)	74.8	36.5	27-69	39.7%	4-14	28.7%	16-21	76.2%	47	12	17	23	9	15	4
Stats Against (All Games)	80.7	39.7	28-63	43.7%	5-16	33.0%	20-24	82.2%	41	8	17	20	9	15	5
vs opponents averaging	75.9	38.2	28-66	42.6%	5-15	33.3%	15-19	79.0%	42	9	16	19	7	13	4
Stats Against (Home Games)	74.1	36.4	25-62	40.2%	6-18	31.1%	18-23	79.7%	41	9	17	21	9	16	6

Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 70.5, ATLANTA 70.3

SCHEDULE AND RESULTS

CHICAGO - Season Results Against the First Half Line
								Team Stats				Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	Half	Line	ATS	Tot.	O/U	Shots	Pct	REB	TO	Shots	Pct	REB	TO
7/21/2015	ATLANTA	97-92	44-48	-5.5	L	80.5	O	32-65	49.2%	42	15	37-71	52.1%	33	14
7/28/2015	@ PHOENIX	87-89	44-31	2	W	79	U	33-86	38.4%	53	12	32-70	45.7%	43	13
7/31/2015	LOS ANGELES	77-88	39-39	-2.5	L	80.5	U	28-67	41.8%	37	9	32-66	48.5%	42	6
8/2/2015	WASHINGTON	71-68	34-39	-3	L	78	U	27-69	39.1%	50	6	25-70	35.7%	41	5
8/4/2015	INDIANA	106-82	57-40	-3	W	80	O	43-68	63.2%	42	14	26-75	34.7%	42	13
8/7/2015	NEW YORK	63-77	32-42	-2.5	L	78.5	U	20-67	29.9%	43	13	27-65	41.5%	52	14
8/9/2015	PHOENIX	74-64	33-37	-2	L	79	U	27-78	34.6%	54	7	25-66	37.9%	44	9
8/11/2015	@ NEW YORK	63-84	36-45	3.5	L	75	O	29-70	41.4%	35	17	33-65	50.8%	42	14
8/14/2015	@ SEATTLE	94-84	52-41	-3	W	78.5	O	34-74	45.9%	46	6	29-60	48.3%	36	11
8/16/2015	@ LOS ANGELES	64-76	35-38	2	L	80	U	23-71	32.4%	49	9	30-62	48.4%	41	11
8/21/2015	WASHINGTON	87-85	45-43	-3	L	75.5	O	37-79	46.8%	49	15	37-73	50.7%	34	12
8/23/2015	@ WASHINGTON	66-64	35-33	1.5	W	77	U	24-62	38.7%	46	15	22-66	33.3%	47	16
8/29/2015	@ ATLANTA
8/30/2015	CONNECTICUT
9/3/2015	@ NEW YORK
9/6/2015	SEATTLE
9/11/2015	TULSA
9/13/2015	@ CONNECTICUT

ATLANTA - Season Results Against the First Half Line
								Team Stats				Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	Half	Line	ATS	Tot.	O/U	Shots	Pct	REB	TO	Shots	Pct	REB	TO
7/21/2015	@ CHICAGO	92-97	48-44	5.5	W	80.5	O	37-71	52.1%	33	14	32-65	49.2%	42	15
7/29/2015	@ SAN ANTONIO	85-102	42-47	2	L	74.5	O	29-66	43.9%	37	13	35-65	53.8%	45	17
7/31/2015	@ MINNESOTA	70-86	29-47	8	L	76.5	U	27-64	42.2%	40	19	33-77	42.9%	49	15
8/2/2015	PHOENIX	68-71	31-43	3	L	77	U	26-71	36.6%	40	12	21-57	36.8%	47	14
8/7/2015	@ INDIANA	77-106	40-47	5	L	77.5	O	24-61	39.3%	41	26	31-68	45.6%	41	10
8/9/2015	@ TULSA	98-90	50-42	3.5	W	79	O	34-67	50.7%	44	12	26-64	40.6%	41	9
8/14/2015	MINNESOTA	82-84	45-36	4.5	W	78	O	30-78	38.5%	41	6	31-67	46.3%	48	14
8/16/2015	CONNECTICUT	90-77	39-42	-2	L	78.5	O	27-59	45.8%	47	12	27-68	39.7%	33	14
8/21/2015	@ NEW YORK	67-78	36-37	5.5	W	76	U	24-67	35.8%	41	13	30-64	46.9%	43	16
8/23/2015	@ CONNECTICUT	102-92	63-47	-1.5	W	78.5	O	40-67	59.7%	34	15	34-70	48.6%	35	12
8/25/2015	CONNECTICUT	71-57	33-18	-4	W	79	U	26-66	39.4%	49	9	19-63	30.2%	40	12
8/28/2015	@ INDIANA	90-84	38-41	4	W	80	U	28-63	44.4%	39	14	27-59	45.8%	35	18
8/29/2015	CHICAGO
9/1/2015	@ NEW YORK
9/6/2015	WASHINGTON
9/9/2015	LOS ANGELES
9/11/2015	INDIANA
9/13/2015	@ WASHINGTON

HEAD-TO-HEAD HISTORY

All games in this series since 1997

ATLANTA is 19-17 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO since 1997

19 of 35 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997

Games over the last 3 seasons

ATLANTA is 9-6 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons

9 of 15 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons

All games played at ATLANTA since 1997

CHICAGO is 11-8 versus the first half line when playing against ATLANTA since 1997

10 of 19 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997

Games played at ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons.

ATLANTA is 4-4 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons

4 of 8 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons

						Shooting		3pt shots		Free Throws		Rebounds
Date	Teams	Score	Line	Result	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	Pct	FTM-A	Pct	Tot.	OFF	TO
7/21/2015	ATLANTA	92	163	ATS	48	37-71	52.1%	6-11	54.5%	12-16	75.0%	33	7	14
	CHICAGO	97	-9.5	SU Over	44	32-65	49.2%	5-11	45.5%	28-32	87.5%	42	9	15
6/24/2015	ATLANTA	96	159.5	ATS	34	38-88	43.2%	6-19	31.6%	14-19	73.7%	50	15	13
	CHICAGO	100	-8.5	SU Over	40	30-72	41.7%	6-13	46.2%	34-36	94.4%	49	10	15
6/19/2015	CHICAGO	73	-3.5	Under	36	22-62	35.5%	4-14	28.6%	25-28	89.3%	41	9	18
	ATLANTA	74	158	SU ATS	37	30-71	42.3%	1-9	11.1%	13-21	61.9%	51	10	17
8/26/2014	CHICAGO	81	158	SU ATS	41	29-65	44.6%	3-17	17.6%	20-27	74.1%	39	7	9
	ATLANTA	80	-4	Over	54	28-65	43.1%	3-9	33.3%	21-29	72.4%	49	15	13
8/24/2014	ATLANTA	92	156.5	SU ATS	44	35-66	53.0%	4-12	33.3%	18-20	90.0%	36	7	13
	CHICAGO	83	-3	Over	43	28-64	43.7%	4-18	22.2%	23-29	79.3%	39	7	15
8/22/2014	CHICAGO	80	154	SU ATS	36	31-66	47.0%	6-13	46.2%	12-14	85.7%	39	6	13
	ATLANTA	77	-3.5	Over	37	31-73	42.5%	5-13	38.5%	10-12	83.3%	42	9	11
8/10/2014	ATLANTA	69	156	Under	36	25-69	36.2%	8-19	42.1%	11-15	73.3%	46	10	15
	CHICAGO	80	-6.5	SU ATS	32	27-63	42.9%	8-14	57.1%	18-22	81.8%	42	6	11
7/25/2014	CHICAGO	79	160	SU ATS	43	28-52	53.8%	1-4	25.0%	22-25	88.0%	34	7	24
	ATLANTA	75	-9	Under	29	29-67	43.3%	2-11	18.2%	15-17	88.2%	33	10	20
7/13/2014	CHICAGO	79	159	ATS	46	28-74	37.8%	1-4	25.0%	22-28	78.6%	55	13	21
	ATLANTA	81	-7	SU Over	42	29-82	35.4%	3-15	20.0%	20-30	66.7%	60	21	18
6/7/2014	CHICAGO	59	160	Under	31	22-65	33.8%	2-9	22.2%	13-18	72.2%	40	10	18
	ATLANTA	97	-6	SU ATS	56	35-78	44.9%	8-18	44.4%	19-27	70.4%	59	20	13
5/24/2014	ATLANTA	73	152.5	Over	39	28-66	42.4%	5-17	29.4%	12-15	80.0%	37	10	15
	CHICAGO	87	-2	SU ATS	41	30-64	46.9%	8-14	57.1%	19-22	86.4%	41	10	16

COACHING TRENDS

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring CHICAGO to cover the first half line

There are 1 trends with a total rating of 0 stars.

Michael is 9-18 against the 1rst half line (-10.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.6, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring ATLANTA to cover the first half line

There are 36 trends with a total rating of 35 stars.

Pokey is 75-98 against the 1rst half line (-32.8 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 41-58 against the 1rst half line (-22.8 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 25-49 against the 1rst half line (-28.9 Units) in August or September games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.2, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 2*)

Pokey is 17-30 against the 1rst half line (-16.0 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 48-66 against the 1rst half line (-24.6 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 45-64 against the 1rst half line (-25.4 Units) after a division game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 21-37 against the 1rst half line (-19.7 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 49-63 against the 1rst half line (-20.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 28-45 against the 1rst half line (-21.5 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.5, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 24-38 against the 1rst half line (-17.8 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 13-28 against the 1rst half line (-17.8 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 2*)

Pokey is 16-31 against the 1rst half line (-18.1 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 7-17 against the 1rst half line (-11.7 Units) off a road win against a division rival as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.3, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 10-23 against the 1rst half line (-15.3 Units) off a road win as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.8, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 2*)

Pokey is 27-43 against the 1rst half line (-20.3 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.4, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 20-36 against the 1rst half line (-19.6 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.1, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 29-54 against the 1rst half line (-30.4 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.3, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Pokey is 30-50 against the 1rst half line (-25.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 34-50 against the 1rst half line (-21.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 11-21 against the 1rst half line (-12.1 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.4, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 8-18 against the 1rst half line (-11.8 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.8, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 21-34 against the 1rst half line (-16.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.8, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 35-50 against the 1rst half line (-20.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.0, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 34-54 against the 1rst half line (-25.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.6, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 59-78 against the 1rst half line (-26.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 25-36 against the 1rst half line (-14.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.5, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 37-52 against the 1rst half line (-20.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.2, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 27-47 against the 1rst half line (-24.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.5, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 2*)

Pokey is 45-66 against the 1rst half line (-27.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 37-57 against the 1rst half line (-25.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.7, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 61-83 against the 1rst half line (-30.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 17-28 against the 1rst half line (-13.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 29-41 against the 1rst half line (-16.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.9, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Michael is 29-13 against the 1rst half line (+14.7 Units) in home games after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 38.7, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Michael is 50-31 against the 1rst half line (+15.9 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 38.5, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Michael is 23-9 against the 1rst half line (+13.1 Units) in home games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 40.8, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring the OVER against the first half total

There are 23 trends with a total rating of 15 stars.

Pokey is 96-77 OVER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 53-36 OVER (+13.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 53-36 OVER (+13.4 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 36-21 OVER (+12.9 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 70.5 as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 21-9 OVER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total on Saturday games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.8, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 34-23 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. division opponents as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.5, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 63-49 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 36-25 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 26-15 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 8-0 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games with 45 or more rebounds as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.3, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 3*)

Pokey is 19-10 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 22-11 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a road game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.5, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 50-35 OVER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 28-17 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.0, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 21-11 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.4, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 19-7 OVER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.8, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Pokey is 48-36 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.0, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 64-48 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 82-63 OVER (+12.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 60-47 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Michael is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total on Saturday games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 44.8, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Michael is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.3, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Michael is 28-14 OVER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 41.4, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring the UNDER against the first half total

There are 3 trends with a total rating of 2 stars.

Pokey is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a game with 8 or less assists as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.3, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Michael is 41-24 UNDER (+14.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 35.2, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Michael is 62-36 UNDER (+22.4 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 34.9, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*)

STATFOX LINE TRACKER™

Here is a summary of past results against the first half line in games where the line movement was similar to:

Opening First Half Line = 1.5, Closing First Half Line = 2

Since 1997, the home underdog covered the first half line 57 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 52 times.

Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog covered the first half line 13 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 8 times.

Here is a summary of past over/under results in games where the first half total movement was similar to:

Opening First Half Total = 81.5, Closing First Half Total = 82.5

Since 1997, 5 games went under the first half total, while 1 games went over the first half total.
Edge against the first half total=Under

Over the last 3 seasons, 1 games went over the first half total, while 1 games went under the first half total.

Here is a summary of past ATS and Over/Under results in games where the first half line and first half total were similar to:

Closing First Half Line = 2, Closing First Half Total = 82.5

Since 1997, the road favorite covered the first half line 1 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 1 times.

Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog covered the first half line 1 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 0 times.

Since 1997, 2 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total.

Over the last 3 seasons, 1 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total.

KEY PLAYER INJURIES

CHICAGO

No significant injuries.

ATLANTA

[F] 08/03/2015 - Cierra Burdick expected to miss 4-6 weeks ( Foot )

[G] 06/06/2015 - Celine Dumerc out for season ( Suspension )

Last Updated: 5/17/2024 6:43:10 PM EST.