| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
INDIANA TULSA |
|
| 156.5 | 70 Final 76 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
651 | INDIANA | +100 | 652 | TULSA | -120 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (TULSA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (329-123 since 1997.) (72.8%, +90.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (TULSA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (293-104 since 1997.) (73.8%, +86.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (TULSA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (314-115 since 1997.) (73.2%, +83.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (378-237 since 1997.) (61.5%, +83.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - in non-conference games, off a home loss. (294-207 since 1997.) (58.7%, +80.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (TULSA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (298-116 since 1997.) (72%, +73.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (INDIANA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season. (179-66 since 1997.) (73.1%, +57.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - in non-conference games, off a home loss against a division rival. (167-121 since 1997.) (58%, +52.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (124-80 since 1997.) (60.8%, +51.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (147-98 since 1997.) (60%, +51.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (105-24 since 1997.) (81.4%, +51.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - in non-conference games, off 2 or more consecutive home losses. (74-28 since 1997.) (72.5%, +48.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games. (105-65 since 1997.) (61.8%, +42.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in non-conference games, off 2 or more consecutive home losses. (47-7 since 1997.) (87%, +38 units. Rating = 5*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (INDIANA) - in non-conference games, off 2 or more consecutive home losses. (54-9 since 1997.) (85.7%, +37.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (24-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +21 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (51-29 since 1997.) (63.8%, +35.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (32-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +26.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (75-41 since 1997.) (64.7%, +33.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in non-conference games, off 2 or more consecutive home losses. (41-5 since 1997.) (89.1%, +33 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (INDIANA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (66-33 since 1997.) (66.7%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less. (75-47 since 1997.) (61.5%, +30 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (47-20 since 1997.) (70.1%, +28.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less. (34-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (68%, +24.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - in non-conference games, off an upset win over a division rival as a home underdog. (41-29 since 1997.) (58.6%, +27.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (37-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.5%, +17.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (56-32 since 1997.) (63.6%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - in non-conference games, off 2 or more consecutive upset losses as a home favorite. (27-12 since 1997.) (69.2%, +18.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (INDIANA) - after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less. (25-7 since 1997.) (78.1%, +18.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (INDIANA) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in August or September games. (38-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.4%, +21.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (60-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +28.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less. (25-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +17.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off an upset win as an underdog. (35-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less. (23-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (109-78 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.3%, +35.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better. (67-32 since 1997.) (67.7%, +36.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better. (90-48 since 1997.) (65.2%, +35.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (87-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.4%, +45.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in August or September games. (36-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +28.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (TULSA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (52-28 since 1997.) (65%, +27.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (TULSA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (42-22 since 1997.) (65.6%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (TULSA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games. (37-19 since 1997.) (66.1%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (66-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +38.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (66-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +38.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (66-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +38.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (TULSA) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, good rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game. (25-9 since 1997.) (73.5%, +17 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (28-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +20.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA | 79 | | 28-64 | 43.5% | 5-15 | 37.1% | 18-22 | 80.4% | 42 | 10 | 14 | TULSA | 78 | | 27-67 | 40.0% | 5-18 | 29.9% | 20-25 | 80.0% | 44 | 13 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, INDIANA won the game straight up 501 times, while TULSA won 469 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
INDIANA is 7-2 against the money line (+6.7 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season. The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 69.9 | INDIANA is 105-66 against the money line (+38.1 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.8, OPPONENT 70.3 | INDIANA is 78-52 against the money line (+26.5 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 73.6, OPPONENT 70.9 | INDIANA is 5-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in road games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game this season. The average score was INDIANA 79.8, OPPONENT 73.5 | INDIANA is 10-4 against the money line (+9.2 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.8, OPPONENT 76.9 | INDIANA is 11-4 against the money line (+6.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was INDIANA 84.8, OPPONENT 78.4 | TULSA is 22-47 against the money line (-27.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 79.1, OPPONENT 82.4 | TULSA is 5-14 against the money line (-10.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 78.4, OPPONENT 80.6 | TULSA is 6-18 against the money line (-12.9 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 76.6, OPPONENT 79.8 | TULSA is 5-29 against the money line (-22.2 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was TULSA 75.3, OPPONENT 85.5 | TULSA is 11-31 against the money line (-18.3 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 82.1, OPPONENT 86.9 | TULSA is 13-27 against the money line (-16.6 Units) in home games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was TULSA 80.0, OPPONENT 79.6 |
|
INDIANA is 3-8 against the money line (-8.7 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 72.5, OPPONENT 77.4 | INDIANA is 23-48 against the money line (-53.0 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 74.4, OPPONENT 79.9 | INDIANA is 4-10 against the money line (-7.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was INDIANA 78.3, OPPONENT 86.1 | INDIANA is 90-98 against the money line (-45.5 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 81.7, OPPONENT 82.3 | TULSA is 12-5 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in home games when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was TULSA 77.9, OPPONENT 72.4 | TULSA is 6-1 against the money line (+5.7 Units) in home games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was TULSA 78.7, OPPONENT 69.1 | TULSA is 19-13 against the money line (+11.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 87.8, OPPONENT 84.8 |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 7-0 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.9, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 8-2 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was INDIANA 78.2, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 8-1 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.2, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 9-3 against the money line (+6.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was INDIANA 77.2, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 14-7 against the money line (+8.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was INDIANA 79.3, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 14-10 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.5, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 13-8 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.4, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 12-7 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.8, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 16-7 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was INDIANA 79.5, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 26-16 against the money line (+10.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.4, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 11-5 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was INDIANA 76.3, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 10-5 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 11-3 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.5, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 5-0 against the money line (+6.4 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game this season. The average score was INDIANA 83.4, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 16-13 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.1, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 11-6 against the money line (+6.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 6-13 against the money line (-10.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 74.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 14-29 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 77.8, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 13-27 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 78.1, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 17-11 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in all games this season. The average score was INDIANA 78.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 16-12 against the money line (+13.3 Units) as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 7-3 against the money line (+7.7 Units) as a road underdog of +200 or less this season. The average score was INDIANA 77.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 18-14 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.0, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 18-14 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.0, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 8-4 against the money line (+7.5 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season. The average score was INDIANA 75.4, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 11-6 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after a division game this season. The average score was INDIANA 80.3, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 10-4 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was INDIANA 79.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 19-8 against the money line (+16.5 Units) after a game where they were called for 27 or more fouls since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.4, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 5-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games this season. The average score was INDIANA 81.0, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 11-4 against the money line (+6.5 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games this season. The average score was INDIANA 77.1, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 5-0 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in road games off a home loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 86.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 5*) | INDIANA is 7-1 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in road games off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 81.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 5*) | INDIANA is 5-0 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in road games off a upset loss as a favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 80.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 6-1 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in road games off a home loss over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 84.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 5-1 against the money line (+8.2 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 81.8, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 9-5 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 7-2 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was INDIANA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 9-3 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.8, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 4*) | INDIANA is 21-9 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 79.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 5-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was INDIANA 84.0, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 14-7 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was INDIANA 80.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 13-6 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was INDIANA 80.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 12-5 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was INDIANA 79.5, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 5-1 against the money line (+6.5 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was INDIANA 74.0, OPPONENT 68.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 6-1 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more this season. The average score was INDIANA 81.1, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 10-3 against the money line (+12.5 Units) in road games after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.0, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 4*) | INDIANA is 10-2 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.9, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 5*) | INDIANA is 5-1 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 82.5, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 17-36 against the money line (-19.9 Units) in home games after a division game since 1997. The average score was TULSA 80.0, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 15-42 against the money line (-22.9 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997. The average score was TULSA 74.3, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 24-33 against the money line (-24.8 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 70.9, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 67-66 against the money line (-33.7 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.9, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 4-8 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.1, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 5-12 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 1-7 against the money line (-9.0 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 68.6, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 116-128 against the money line (-46.9 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.5, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 39-54 against the money line (-24.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.0, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 9-4 against the money line (+7.7 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was TULSA 79.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 9-2 against the money line (+10.4 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent this season. The average score was TULSA 77.5, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 4*) | TULSA is 10-2 against the money line (+10.1 Units) off an upset win as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 82.8, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 3*) | TULSA is 8-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in home games off a home win over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 78.0, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 10-4 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was TULSA 76.1, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 13-3 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season. The average score was TULSA 78.9, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 5*) | TULSA is 10-2 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games this season. The average score was TULSA 78.8, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 4*) | TULSA is 7-2 against the money line (+6.5 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games this season. The average score was TULSA 79.0, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 6-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 83.4, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 11-2 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was TULSA 79.2, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 5*) | TULSA is 8-2 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was TULSA 80.6, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 6-1 against the money line (+6.6 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was TULSA 81.3, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 17-11 | +7 | 13-14 | 17-11 | 78.5 | 40.4 | 42.6% | 40.4 | 76.8 | 40.4 | 44.6% | 40.8 | Road Games | 8-5 | +6.4 | 8-5 | 5-8 | 75.7 | 38.9 | 40.6% | 41.0 | 76.2 | 40.1 | 46.4% | 39.9 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1.5 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 79.4 | 41.2 | 43.7% | 39.8 | 76.2 | 42.0 | 45.6% | 37.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.5 | 40.4 | 28-65 | 42.6% | 6-15 | 36.6% | 18-22 | 79.5% | 40 | 10 | 15 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.5 | 38 | 28-66 | 42.2% | 5-15 | 33.4% | 15-19 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 75.7 | 38.9 | 27-66 | 40.6% | 6-16 | 40.6% | 16-19 | 80.2% | 41 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 9 | 14 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.8 | 40.4 | 28-63 | 44.6% | 4-14 | 30.4% | 16-21 | 77.7% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 75.9 | 38.2 | 28-66 | 42.9% | 5-15 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 79.2% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 76.2 | 40.1 | 29-62 | 46.4% | 4-13 | 28.6% | 14-19 | 76.7% | 40 | 8 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 14-14 | +1.7 | 15-11 | 13-15 | 77.6 | 40.4 | 38.6% | 44.9 | 76.7 | 36.9 | 44.0% | 41.2 | Home Games | 9-5 | +2 | 7-6 | 5-9 | 79.6 | 41.0 | 39.4% | 45.6 | 73.9 | 34.5 | 42.8% | 38.5 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +5.5 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 77.8 | 39.2 | 41.8% | 45.4 | 71.4 | 33.4 | 41.2% | 37.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.6 | 40.4 | 27-69 | 38.6% | 6-19 | 32.6% | 18-23 | 79.1% | 45 | 12 | 14 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 75 | 37.6 | 28-66 | 42.3% | 5-15 | 32.7% | 14-18 | 79.6% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 79.6 | 41.0 | 26-67 | 39.4% | 6-19 | 33.6% | 20-25 | 81.6% | 46 | 12 | 15 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.7 | 36.9 | 28-63 | 44.0% | 5-14 | 33.3% | 16-20 | 79.5% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 21 | 6 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 74.6 | 37.2 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 5-14 | 32.7% | 14-18 | 80.0% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 73.9 | 34.5 | 27-62 | 42.8% | 5-16 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 82.2% | 38 | 8 | 15 | 22 | 6 | 14 | 6 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: INDIANA 70.2, TULSA 71.8 |
| | |
|
|
7/21/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 62-80 | L | -125 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 25 | 10 | 27-45 | 60.0% | 43 | 20 | 7/28/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 75-73 | W | -105 | 33-81 | 40.7% | 52 | 13 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 37 | 18 | 7/29/2015 | NEW YORK | 84-72 | W | +120 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 38 | 15 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 33 | 21 | 8/2/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 83-70 | W | -250 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 43 | 13 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 33 | 12 | 8/4/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 82-106 | L | +180 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 42 | 13 | 43-68 | 63.2% | 42 | 14 | 8/7/2015 | ATLANTA | 106-77 | W | -400 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 41 | 10 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 41 | 26 | 8/11/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 73-62 | W | +145 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 44 | 10 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 33 | 14 | 8/16/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 75-63 | W | +180 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 42 | 10 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 36 | 10 | 8/18/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 79-68 | W | +155 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 46 | 16 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 34 | 17 | 8/21/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 75-63 | W | -210 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 37 | 8 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 39 | 19 | 8/23/2015 | NEW YORK | 80-79 | W | -140 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 37 | 14 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 38 | 10 | 8/26/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 79-81 | L | -175 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 44 | 15 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 36 | 9 | 8/28/2015 | ATLANTA | 84-90 | L | -330 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 35 | 18 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 39 | 14 | 8/30/2015 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2015 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/4/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/8/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2015 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2015 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/21/2015 | WASHINGTON | 69-76 | L | -165 | 23-73 | 31.5% | 60 | 14 | 25-56 | 44.6% | 31 | 8 | 7/30/2015 | PHOENIX | 66-78 | L | +105 | 21-72 | 29.2% | 46 | 12 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 40 | 16 | 8/1/2015 | MINNESOTA | 80-86 | L | +180 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 43 | 8 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 43 | 11 | 8/4/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 84-87 | L | +280 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 49 | 8 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 43 | 13 | 8/6/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 57-84 | L | +250 | 17-65 | 26.2% | 37 | 10 | 34-63 | 54.0% | 47 | 14 | 8/9/2015 | ATLANTA | 90-98 | L | -300 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 41 | 9 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 44 | 12 | 8/12/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 74-80 | L | +155 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 39 | 13 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 43 | 10 | 8/15/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 81-76 | W | +280 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 44 | 14 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 33 | 12 | 8/18/2015 | PHOENIX | 74-59 | W | +170 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 53 | 17 | 20-60 | 33.3% | 38 | 15 | 8/21/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 84-76 | W | -220 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 44 | 10 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 44 | 14 | 8/28/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 76-66 | W | -105 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 47 | 13 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 31 | 13 | 8/30/2015 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2015 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/6/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/8/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2015 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2015 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
INDIANA is 29-27 (+0.1 Units) against the money line versus TULSA since 1997 |
| |
INDIANA is 4-1 (+2.5 Units) against the money line versus TULSA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
TULSA is 19-11 (+1.4 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA since 1997 |
| |
INDIANA is 2-0 (+2.5 Units) against the money line versus TULSA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/15/2015 | TULSA | 80 | 160.5 | | 45 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 14-22 | 63.6% | 48 | 14 | 12 | | INDIANA | 83 | -3 | SU Over | 52 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 22-34 | 64.7% | 50 | 11 | 13 | 7/8/2014 | INDIANA | 78 | 155 | SU ATS | 41 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 18-20 | 90.0% | 36 | 12 | 11 | | TULSA | 76 | -1 | Under | 34 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 19-25 | 76.0% | 41 | 13 | 15 | 6/25/2014 | TULSA | 107 | 152 | SU ATS | 36 | 39-78 | 50.0% | 8-16 | 50.0% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 46 | 9 | 14 | | INDIANA | 102 | -4.5 | Over | 51 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 29-36 | 80.6% | 45 | 8 | 12 |
|
| | |
|
Stephanie is 7-3 against the money line (+7.7 Units) as a road underdog of +200 or less as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Stephanie is 11-6 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after a division game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 80.3, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Stephanie is 10-4 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 79.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Stephanie is 7-2 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Stephanie is 14-7 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 80.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Stephanie is 13-6 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 80.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Stephanie is 12-5 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 79.5, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Stephanie is 6-1 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 81.1, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Stephanie is 8-2 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.2, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Stephanie is 14-7 against the money line (+8.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 79.3, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Stephanie is 16-7 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 79.5, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Stephanie is 11-5 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.3, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Stephanie is 5-0 against the money line (+6.4 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 83.4, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 23-38 against the money line (-26.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.8, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 20-34 against the money line (-31.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 77.4, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 32-48 against the money line (-35.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 78.2, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 16-30 against the money line (-19.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 77.0, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 25-45 against the money line (-23.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 78.1, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 5-19 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.5, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Fred is 13-8 against the money line (+8.4 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 79.0, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 11-1 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in home games off a home win against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 83.0, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Fred is 10-2 against the money line (+10.1 Units) off an upset win as an underdog as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 82.8, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 18-5 against the money line (+14.4 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 78.7, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 8-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in home games off a home win as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 78.0, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 13-6 against the money line (+11.3 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 75.5, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 27-11 against the money line (+14.2 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 80.3, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 22-13 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 81.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 16-8 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 79.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 6-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 83.4, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 17-8 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 80.0, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 26-16 against the money line (+13.6 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 7-2 against the money line (+6.6 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 81.2, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 15-6 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 81.1, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 15 times, while the road underdog won straight up 9 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 2 times, while the road underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 08/30/2015 - Briann January expected to miss Sunday vs. Tulsa Shock ( Knee ) | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/2/2024 5:09:51 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|