| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
PHOENIX MINNESOTA |
|
| 144.5 | 61 Final 71 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
653 | PHOENIX | +220 | 654 | MINNESOTA | -300 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (329-123 since 1997.) (72.8%, +90.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (293-104 since 1997.) (73.8%, +86.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (314-115 since 1997.) (73.2%, +83.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season. (311-127 since 1997.) (71%, +83.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (378-237 since 1997.) (61.5%, +83.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (298-116 since 1997.) (72%, +73.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents, off a road loss by 10 points or more. (246-90 since 1997.) (73.2%, +67.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (252-100 since 1997.) (71.6%, +65.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss. (261-109 since 1997.) (70.5%, +61.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (192-132 since 1997.) (59.3%, +60.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss. (268-114 since 1997.) (70.2%, +58.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season. (179-66 since 1997.) (73.1%, +57.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (151-95 since 1997.) (61.4%, +56.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more. (136-49 since 1997.) (73.5%, +53.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more. (140-53 since 1997.) (72.5%, +50.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - cold team - failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (32-8 since 1997.) (80%, +22.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) after 15 or more games. (27-6 since 1997.) (81.8%, +20.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after being beaten by the spread by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games. (38-20 since 1997.) (65.5%, +19.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a marginal winning team (51% to 60%). (31-11 since 1997.) (73.8%, +18.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after one or more consecutive overs, an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG). (79-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +36.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws. (291-278 since 1997.) (51.1%, +78 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (192-132 since 1997.) (59.3%, +60.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (151-95 since 1997.) (61.4%, +56.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record. (93-63 since 1997.) (59.6%, +45.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (73-46 since 1997.) (61.3%, +39.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - good defensive team (38-40.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better. (62-24 since 1997.) (72.1%, +30 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more. (148-141 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.2%, +47.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (40-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +28 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (54-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.4%, +32 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
PHOENIX | 70 | | 27-65 | 42.4% | 5-14 | 32.0% | 11-13 | 82.0% | 41 | 7 | 13 | MINNESOTA | 74 | | 29-68 | 42.7% | 4-12 | 33.9% | 12-14 | 80.5% | 44 | 9 | 11 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 586 times, while PHOENIX won 399 times. Edge against the money line=PHOENIX |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
PHOENIX is 28-10 against the money line (+15.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 74.8 | PHOENIX is 10-2 against the money line (+9.0 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.4, OPPONENT 74.5 | PHOENIX is 17-5 against the money line (+13.4 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.6, OPPONENT 75.6 | PHOENIX is 19-6 against the money line (+11.0 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 79.6, OPPONENT 74.4 | PHOENIX is 98-67 against the money line (+30.6 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 78.4, OPPONENT 76.2 | MINNESOTA is 6-10 against the money line (-12.7 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.5, OPPONENT 74.6 | MINNESOTA is 57-75 against the money line (-45.2 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.6, OPPONENT 74.2 |
|
PHOENIX is 88-100 against the money line (-44.6 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 75.4, OPPONENT 75.7 | PHOENIX is 2-7 against the money line (-8.0 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season. The average score was PHOENIX 70.6, OPPONENT 74.3 | PHOENIX is 51-86 against the money line (-46.4 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 73.3, OPPONENT 76.0 | PHOENIX is 1-6 against the money line (-9.6 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game this season. The average score was PHOENIX 69.7, OPPONENT 74.7 | MINNESOTA is 30-2 against the money line (+24.2 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 70.5 | MINNESOTA is 42-16 against the money line (+16.3 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 73.9 |
|
| | |
|
PHOENIX is 10-4 against the money line (+13.7 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 79.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 23-10 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 77.1, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 34-14 against the money line (+21.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 15-5 against the money line (+8.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.2, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 19-7 against the money line (+10.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 15-4 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.8, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 20-6 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.9, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 29-8 against the money line (+17.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.5, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 40-15 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.6, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 26-7 against the money line (+15.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.6, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 36-12 against the money line (+17.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.6, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 16-6 against the money line (+8.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.3, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 28-6 against the money line (+20.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.9, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 5*) | PHOENIX is 41-12 against the money line (+23.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.9, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 32-8 against the money line (+20.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.6, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 45-15 against the money line (+20.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.9, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 20-6 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 79.4, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 30-11 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 79.6, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 18-2 against the money line (+16.1 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 6*) | PHOENIX is 24-4 against the money line (+20.5 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.7, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 6*) | PHOENIX is 28-7 against the money line (+18.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.0, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 36-12 against the money line (+16.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.1, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 14-3 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 79.7, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 22-7 against the money line (+10.9 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 79.5, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 25-7 against the money line (+14.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.7, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 34-11 against the money line (+18.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.8, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 4-7 against the money line (-11.1 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.1, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 1-5 against the money line (-9.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 69.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 3-6 against the money line (-13.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 87-98 against the money line (-42.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.0, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 7-8 against the money line (-11.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 38-17 against the money line (+17.3 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.0, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 19-8 against the money line (+9.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 17-1 against the money line (+14.8 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 42-16 against the money line (+14.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.1, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 40-13 against the money line (+20.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 54-21 against the money line (+21.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.1, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
PHOENIX is 51-18 against the money line (+21.2 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.5, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 13-3 against the money line (+12.2 Units) on Sunday games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 79.7, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 4*) | PHOENIX is 34-9 against the money line (+19.6 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.3, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 6-1 against the money line (+6.9 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 79.4, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 13-1 against the money line (+13.6 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 84.6, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 6*) | PHOENIX is 190-134 against the money line (+27.0 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 80.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 25-10 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 78.3, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 13-5 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 79.1, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 19-5 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.2, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 9-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.7, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 25-7 against the money line (+14.1 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 79.6, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 9-2 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in road games after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 78.9, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 4*) | PHOENIX is 22-7 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.0, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 18-5 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 150-149 against the money line (-67.4 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.2, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 50-74 against the money line (-44.6 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.1, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 44-70 against the money line (-36.1 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.1, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 68-91 against the money line (-48.8 Units) off a road loss since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.3, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 33-46 against the money line (-27.8 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.3, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 64-51 against the money line (-38.0 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.3, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 50-71 against the money line (-44.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 51-72 against the money line (-32.7 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.2, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 100-149 against the money line (-80.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.7, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 74-116 against the money line (-75.3 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 6-8 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after playing a road game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.7, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 54-59 against the money line (-33.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.1, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 119-149 against the money line (-61.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.0, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 47-17 against the money line (+17.7 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 45-16 against the money line (+21.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 24-7 against the money line (+14.0 Units) in home games after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 11-2 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after 2 straight games where they were called for 15 or less fouls over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 14-1 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in home games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 45-19 against the money line (+16.4 Units) in home games revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.9, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 17-12 | -2.9 | 9-19 | 9-18 | 75.2 | 36.6 | 42.8% | 41.0 | 73.3 | 36.1 | 40.1% | 43.2 | Road Games | 6-8 | -4.3 | 4-10 | 5-9 | 72.2 | 35.3 | 40.9% | 40.1 | 74.1 | 37.1 | 40.8% | 43.7 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -3 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 70.0 | 34.0 | 42.6% | 41.6 | 74.0 | 36.8 | 41.8% | 38.2 | Division Games | 13-5 | +4.7 | 8-9 | 5-11 | 77.2 | 37.5 | 44.7% | 39.8 | 71.7 | 35.1 | 40.6% | 40.9 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 75.2 | 36.6 | 27-64 | 42.8% | 5-15 | 33.0% | 16-19 | 82.4% | 41 | 7 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 7 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.9 | 38.2 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 5-15 | 32.8% | 15-19 | 79.4% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.2 | 35.3 | 26-63 | 40.9% | 5-15 | 34.8% | 15-19 | 80.8% | 40 | 7 | 15 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 7 | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.3 | 36.1 | 27-69 | 40.1% | 5-15 | 33.0% | 13-17 | 80.2% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 75.3 | 37.9 | 28-66 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 79.6% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 74.1 | 37.1 | 27-66 | 40.8% | 5-15 | 36.1% | 15-18 | 80.3% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 19-10 | -7.6 | 13-16 | 12-17 | 76.1 | 37.0 | 44.3% | 41.5 | 72.2 | 36.6 | 41.1% | 39.9 | Home Games | 10-3 | -4.9 | 7-6 | 6-7 | 78.4 | 38.0 | 44.7% | 42.8 | 69.4 | 33.8 | 39.6% | 39.8 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -7.9 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 68.6 | 34.2 | 39.6% | 41.2 | 75.4 | 40.6 | 43.0% | 42.2 | Division Games | 14-5 | +1.5 | 10-9 | 6-13 | 75.3 | 36.5 | 45.9% | 40.0 | 69.6 | 36.1 | 40.0% | 38.9 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.1 | 37.0 | 29-66 | 44.3% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 14-17 | 82.2% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 16 | 6 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 76.1 | 37.8 | 28-66 | 43.0% | 5-14 | 33.1% | 15-19 | 79.0% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 78.4 | 38.0 | 30-67 | 44.7% | 4-12 | 36.0% | 14-17 | 81.5% | 43 | 10 | 19 | 15 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 72.2 | 36.6 | 27-67 | 41.1% | 5-17 | 31.2% | 12-14 | 83.0% | 40 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 74.9 | 37.7 | 28-65 | 42.3% | 5-15 | 32.5% | 15-19 | 79.7% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 69.4 | 33.8 | 27-67 | 39.6% | 5-16 | 31.6% | 11-13 | 86.8% | 40 | 8 | 18 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: PHOENIX 69.5, MINNESOTA 70.8 |
| | |
|
|
7/21/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 65-70 | L | -175 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 30 | 7 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 38 | 10 | 7/28/2015 | CHICAGO | 89-87 | W | -175 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 43 | 13 | 33-86 | 38.4% | 53 | 12 | 7/30/2015 | @ TULSA | 78-66 | W | -125 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 40 | 16 | 21-72 | 29.2% | 46 | 12 | 8/2/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 71-68 | W | -250 | 21-57 | 36.8% | 47 | 14 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 40 | 12 | 8/4/2015 | TULSA | 87-84 | W | -360 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 43 | 13 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 49 | 8 | 8/7/2015 | MINNESOTA | 73-66 | W | +105 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 44 | 6 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 37 | 9 | 8/9/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 64-74 | L | +155 | 25-66 | 37.9% | 44 | 9 | 27-78 | 34.6% | 54 | 7 | 8/12/2015 | SEATTLE | 83-66 | W | | 30-67 | 44.8% | 46 | 12 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 32 | 10 | 8/16/2015 | INDIANA | 63-75 | L | -220 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 36 | 10 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 42 | 10 | 8/18/2015 | @ TULSA | 59-74 | L | -200 | 20-60 | 33.3% | 38 | 15 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 53 | 17 | 8/21/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 68-78 | L | -200 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 40 | 15 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 34 | 8 | 8/23/2015 | MINNESOTA | 79-67 | W | -105 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 43 | 12 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 36 | 12 | 8/27/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 81-80 | W | -330 | 28-56 | 50.0% | 42 | 16 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 33 | 8 | 8/28/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 63-71 | L | +170 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 45 | 19 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 35 | 11 | 8/30/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/2/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/5/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2015 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2015 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/22/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 77-78 | L | -360 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 50 | 16 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 42 | 15 | 7/29/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 82-76 | W | -400 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 31 | 12 | 31-55 | 56.4% | 32 | 21 | 7/31/2015 | ATLANTA | 86-70 | W | | 33-77 | 42.9% | 49 | 15 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 40 | 19 | 8/1/2015 | @ TULSA | 86-80 | W | -220 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 43 | 11 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 43 | 8 | 8/4/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 61-83 | L | -125 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 37 | 15 | 37-77 | 48.1% | 42 | 7 | 8/7/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 66-73 | L | -125 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 37 | 9 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 44 | 6 | 8/9/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 72-64 | W | -220 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 43 | 9 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 39 | 16 | 8/11/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 83-76 | W | | 34-66 | 51.5% | 40 | 14 | 30-76 | 39.5% | 44 | 12 | 8/14/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 84-82 | W | -360 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 48 | 14 | 30-78 | 38.5% | 41 | 6 | 8/16/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 69-77 | L | -175 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 48 | 8 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 42 | 8 | 8/19/2015 | WASHINGTON | 61-79 | L | -500 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 41 | 14 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 43 | 10 | 8/21/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 78-61 | W | -360 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 43 | 13 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 39 | 10 | 8/23/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 67-79 | L | -115 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 36 | 12 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 43 | 12 | 8/28/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 68-81 | L | +145 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 38 | 8 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 44 | 14 | 8/30/2015 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/4/2015 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/6/2015 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/8/2015 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2015 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
MINNESOTA is 33-35 (-2.9 Units) against the money line versus PHOENIX since 1997 |
| |
PHOENIX is 8-9 (+1.7 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
MINNESOTA is 21-11 (+3.6 Units) against the money line versus PHOENIX since 1997 |
| |
MINNESOTA is 6-1 (+3.8 Units) against the money line versus PHOENIX over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/23/2015 | MINNESOTA | 67 | -1 | Under | 22 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 36 | 6 | 12 | | PHOENIX | 79 | 146.5 | SU ATS | 37 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 43 | 8 | 12 | 8/7/2015 | MINNESOTA | 66 | -2 | Under | 35 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 3-3 | 100.0% | 37 | 5 | 9 | | PHOENIX | 73 | 149 | SU ATS | 33 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 44 | 10 | 6 | 6/27/2015 | PHOENIX | 56 | 150 | Under | 23 | 19-57 | 33.3% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 42 | 9 | 20 | | MINNESOTA | 71 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 37 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 6-9 | 66.7% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 40 | 9 | 12 | 6/14/2015 | MINNESOTA | 66 | -8 | Under | 38 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 0-9 | 0.0% | 18-18 | 100.0% | 45 | 8 | 16 | | PHOENIX | 81 | 152 | SU ATS | 48 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 20-22 | 90.9% | 39 | 9 | 10 | 9/2/2014 | MINNESOTA | 78 | 161.5 | Over | 42 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 38 | 11 | 8 | | PHOENIX | 96 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 37-63 | 58.7% | 6-13 | 46.2% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 35 | 4 | 11 | 8/31/2014 | PHOENIX | 77 | 160.5 | Under | 44 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 37 | 5 | 14 | | MINNESOTA | 82 | -3 | SU ATS | 36 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 22-25 | 88.0% | 39 | 11 | 11 | 8/29/2014 | MINNESOTA | 71 | 161 | Under | 31 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 36 | 9 | 14 | | PHOENIX | 85 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 42 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 23-27 | 85.2% | 51 | 12 | 15 | 8/9/2014 | MINNESOTA | 80 | 159 | ATS | 42 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 38 | 7 | 10 | | PHOENIX | 82 | -5 | SU Over | 43 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 40 | 7 | 8 | 7/31/2014 | PHOENIX | 67 | 167 | Under | 36 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 3-17 | 17.6% | 14-20 | 70.0% | 43 | 2 | 13 | | MINNESOTA | 75 | -2 | SU ATS | 39 | 29-77 | 37.7% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 13-20 | 65.0% | 61 | 11 | 13 | 6/18/2014 | MINNESOTA | 79 | 163 | Over | 42 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 3-16 | 18.7% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 28 | 4 | 6 | | PHOENIX | 92 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 52 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 13-13 | 100.0% | 44 | 11 | 13 | 6/15/2014 | PHOENIX | 80 | 165 | SU ATS | 50 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 6-12 | 50.0% | 12-20 | 60.0% | 42 | 5 | 10 | | MINNESOTA | 72 | -5.5 | Under | 31 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 6-9 | 66.7% | 42 | 10 | 10 |
|
| | |
|
Sandy is 51-18 against the money line (+21.2 Units) in all games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.5, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 13-3 against the money line (+12.2 Units) on Sunday games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 79.7, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Sandy is 34-9 against the money line (+19.6 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.3, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 6-1 against the money line (+6.9 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 79.4, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 13-1 against the money line (+13.6 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 84.6, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 6*) | Sandy is 19-5 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.2, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 9-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.7, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 25-7 against the money line (+14.1 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 79.6, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 22-7 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.0, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 18-5 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 15-5 against the money line (+8.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.2, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 19-7 against the money line (+10.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 15-4 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.8, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 20-6 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.9, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 29-8 against the money line (+17.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.5, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 40-15 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.6, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 26-7 against the money line (+15.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.6, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 36-12 against the money line (+17.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.6, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 16-6 against the money line (+8.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.3, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 28-6 against the money line (+20.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.9, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 5*) | Sandy is 41-12 against the money line (+23.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.9, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 32-8 against the money line (+20.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.6, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 45-15 against the money line (+20.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.9, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 20-6 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 79.4, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 30-11 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 79.6, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 18-2 against the money line (+16.1 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 6*) | Sandy is 24-4 against the money line (+20.5 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.7, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 6*) | Sandy is 28-7 against the money line (+18.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.0, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 36-12 against the money line (+16.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.1, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 14-3 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 79.7, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 22-7 against the money line (+10.9 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 79.5, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 25-7 against the money line (+14.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.7, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 34-11 against the money line (+18.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.8, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Cheryl is 138-67 against the money line (+22.1 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 70-17 against the money line (+20.6 Units) as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 74-20 against the money line (+23.4 Units) in home games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 74-20 against the money line (+23.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 56-27 against the money line (+17.6 Units) in August or September games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 90-42 against the money line (+23.8 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 47-19 against the money line (+19.3 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 84-40 against the money line (+20.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 16-5 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after 2 straight games where they were called for 15 or less fouls as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 39-19 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 45-27 against the money line (+10.5 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 21-11 against the money line (+8.7 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 36-15 against the money line (+17.4 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 18-9 against the money line (+9.1 Units) double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 15-2 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in home games revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 40-21 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.4, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 15-3 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 21-8 against the money line (+9.9 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 74-37 against the money line (+16.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 97-54 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 84-38 against the money line (+21.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 111-56 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 78-33 against the money line (+29.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 101-50 against the money line (+23.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 133 times, while the road underdog won straight up 53 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 12 times, while the road underdog won straight up 7 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 06/04/2015 - Diana Taurasi out for season ( Personal ) | [G] 06/04/2015 - Eshaya Murphy out for season ( Knee ) | |
[G] 08/27/2015 - Seimone Augustus out indefinitely ( Ankle ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/4/2024 6:07:17 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|