| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
NEW YORK CONNECTICUT |
|
| 148 | 80 Final 66 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
601 | NEW YORK | -220 | 602 | CONNECTICUT | +180 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG). (86-50 since 1997.) (63.2%, +42.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more. (81-46 since 1997.) (63.8%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games. (59-30 since 1997.) (66.3%, +33.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (41-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (69-45 since 1997.) (60.5%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after one or more consecutive overs, an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG). (79-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.8%, +37.9 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Road favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more. (269-112 since 1997.) (70.6%, +75.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more. (270-114 since 1997.) (70.3%, +72.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - vs. division opponents, playing on back-to-back days. (187-63 since 1997.) (74.8%, +70.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more. (250-100 since 1997.) (71.4%, +69.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, on Saturday games. (56-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +31.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, on Saturday games. (67-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.7%, +35.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (191-73 since 1997.) (72.3%, +57.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more. (162-49 since 1997.) (76.8%, +54.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (95-25 since 1997.) (79.2%, +51.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (167-67 since 1997.) (71.4%, +50 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (88-23 since 1997.) (79.3%, +48.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (74-16 since 1997.) (82.2%, +46.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a losing record. (65-17 since 1997.) (79.3%, +38.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (63-15 since 1997.) (80.8%, +37.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (53-8 since 1997.) (86.9%, +35.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (49-9 since 1997.) (84.5%, +33.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (51-10 since 1997.) (83.6%, +33.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home loss, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days. (44-9 since 1997.) (83%, +31 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an good defensive team (38-40.5%) after 15+ games, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher. (43-13 since 1997.) (76.8%, +27.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (57-27 since 1997.) (67.9%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (117-88 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.1%, +43.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (48-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +13.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (56-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +20.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (106-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.5%, +19.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (220-175 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.7%, +46.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (205-154 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.1%, +48.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team. (63-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.7%, +29.7 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK | 74 | | 28-65 | 43.2% | 4-12 | 34.5% | 14-19 | 76.6% | 47 | 11 | 16 | CONNECTICUT | 73 | | 27-67 | 40.3% | 7-19 | 35.8% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 40 | 9 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, NEW YORK won the game straight up 518 times, while CONNECTICUT won 457 times. Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
NEW YORK is 13-2 against the money line (+13.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was NEW YORK 77.4, OPPONENT 69.3 | NEW YORK is 114-89 against the money line (+21.0 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.8, OPPONENT 71.0 | NEW YORK is 72-55 against the money line (+23.7 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.2, OPPONENT 70.6 | NEW YORK is 8-3 against the money line (+5.9 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 77.5, OPPONENT 70.0 | NEW YORK is 8-1 against the money line (+8.5 Units) when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 70.9, OPPONENT 62.9 | NEW YORK is 8-2 against the money line (+6.4 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 76.6, OPPONENT 67.9 | NEW YORK is 96-90 against the money line (+25.1 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 81.0, OPPONENT 80.9 | NEW YORK is 87-42 against the money line (+53.7 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 74.6, OPPONENT 70.5 | NEW YORK is 10-3 against the money line (+8.1 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was NEW YORK 72.8, OPPONENT 65.6 | CONNECTICUT is 13-33 against the money line (-20.8 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.3, OPPONENT 75.8 | CONNECTICUT is 6-13 against the money line (-10.2 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.3, OPPONENT 74.1 |
|
NEW YORK is 65-87 against the money line (-33.6 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 68.9, OPPONENT 71.2 | CONNECTICUT is 49-16 against the money line (+19.0 Units) in home games when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.8, OPPONENT 72.3 | CONNECTICUT is 7-3 against the money line (+7.9 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 75.8 | CONNECTICUT is 138-101 against the money line (+24.5 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 72.9 | CONNECTICUT is 39-18 against the money line (+16.5 Units) in home games when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.9, OPPONENT 72.9 | CONNECTICUT is 65-44 against the money line (+17.5 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.5, OPPONENT 72.1 |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK is 17-11 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 72.9, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 14-6 against the money line (+7.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 75.7, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 16-5 against the money line (+15.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 74.1, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 15-2 against the money line (+15.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 76.1, OPPONENT 67.0 - (Rating = 7*) | NEW YORK is 20-11 against the money line (+12.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 73.7, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 16-5 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 76.6, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 19-11 against the money line (+11.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 73.5, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 14-5 against the money line (+8.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 76.3, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 14-4 against the money line (+10.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 76.8, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-38 against the money line (-21.2 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-14 against the money line (-12.0 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.2, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-34 against the money line (-19.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-44 against the money line (-21.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.6, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
NEW YORK is 11-26 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 72.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK is 19-8 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in all games this season. The average score was NEW YORK 75.1, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 9-5 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in road games this season. The average score was NEW YORK 74.8, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 9-5 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season. The average score was NEW YORK 74.8, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 8-2 against the money line (+6.1 Units) after a non-conference game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 73.1, OPPONENT 67.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 14-5 against the money line (+8.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season. The average score was NEW YORK 76.5, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 12-3 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games this season. The average score was NEW YORK 75.4, OPPONENT 67.6 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 11-3 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games this season. The average score was NEW YORK 76.9, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 13-5 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread this season. The average score was NEW YORK 75.7, OPPONENT 68.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 15-9 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 73.5, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 56-39 against the money line (+15.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.7, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 38-20 against the money line (+19.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 74.2, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 26-11 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 75.7, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 12-3 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after playing a game as favorite this season. The average score was NEW YORK 75.1, OPPONENT 67.3 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 8-2 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite this season. The average score was NEW YORK 75.1, OPPONENT 67.8 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 6-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) in road games after playing a home game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 77.3, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-25 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.5, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-12 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-36 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-7 against the money line (-7.4 Units) after a close loss by 3 points or less over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.3, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-11 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-8 against the money line (-7.0 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
NEW YORK is 2-11 against the money line (-11.9 Units) on Saturday games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 68.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 9-17 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 71.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 2-12 against the money line (-12.3 Units) in road games after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 67.5, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 7-15 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 67.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-10 against the money line (+15.9 Units) in home games after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.2, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 111-89 against the money line (+19.7 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 78-57 against the money line (+20.9 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 42-28 against the money line (+20.4 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 49-39 against the money line (+17.6 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.5, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 81-66 against the money line (+18.1 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.0, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 41-28 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 62-31 against the money line (+21.6 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.7, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-18 against the money line (+14.0 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.5, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-5 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 19-8 | +10.8 | 20-6 | 13-14 | 75.1 | 38.7 | 43.0% | 44.8 | 70.2 | 37.0 | 38.3% | 40.1 | Road Games | 9-5 | +7 | 10-3 | 7-7 | 74.8 | 40.3 | 42.2% | 45.7 | 71.1 | 37.3 | 39.0% | 39.6 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1.6 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 77.4 | 40.0 | 46.7% | 41.6 | 68.2 | 38.6 | 38.6% | 40.2 | Division Games | 10-6 | +5.2 | 12-4 | 8-8 | 75.8 | 39.9 | 43.2% | 43.2 | 73.1 | 38.7 | 39.1% | 41.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 75.1 | 38.7 | 28-65 | 43.0% | 4-12 | 31.2% | 16-21 | 76.7% | 45 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 76.5 | 38.5 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 5-15 | 32.9% | 15-19 | 79.5% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 74.8 | 40.3 | 27-65 | 42.2% | 3-10 | 31.0% | 17-22 | 76.1% | 46 | 11 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.2 | 37.0 | 25-64 | 38.3% | 6-16 | 33.7% | 16-19 | 80.6% | 40 | 7 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 76.2 | 38.3 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 5-15 | 33.4% | 15-19 | 79.8% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 71.1 | 37.3 | 25-64 | 39.0% | 5-16 | 30.7% | 16-20 | 82.1% | 40 | 7 | 16 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 12-16 | +3 | 14-14 | 18-10 | 76.4 | 37.5 | 42.4% | 40.6 | 77.0 | 38.8 | 43.9% | 41.9 | Home Games | 7-8 | -1.3 | 9-6 | 9-6 | 78.1 | 40.1 | 44.4% | 40.7 | 76.2 | 41.9 | 45.0% | 38.8 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -5 | 1-4 | 4-1 | 76.4 | 38.8 | 41.7% | 37.0 | 85.6 | 41.2 | 47.5% | 43.2 | Division Games | 4-13 | -4.8 | 6-11 | 10-7 | 74.8 | 38.0 | 42.4% | 38.2 | 79.8 | 40.6 | 44.6% | 42.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.4 | 37.5 | 29-68 | 42.4% | 7-19 | 34.9% | 12-16 | 74.5% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.8 | 38.2 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 5-15 | 32.8% | 15-19 | 79.8% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 78.1 | 40.1 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 7-18 | 36.8% | 11-15 | 74.6% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.0 | 38.8 | 28-64 | 43.9% | 5-14 | 35.5% | 16-20 | 82.9% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 16 | 7 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 76.2 | 38.4 | 28-66 | 42.6% | 5-15 | 33.1% | 15-19 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 76.2 | 41.9 | 29-64 | 45.0% | 5-13 | 35.2% | 14-16 | 84.3% | 39 | 8 | 15 | 16 | 8 | 15 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: NEW YORK 70.3, CONNECTICUT 70.2 |
| | |
|
|
7/21/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 81-77 | W | -200 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 39 | 10 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 36 | 14 | 7/22/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 59-53 | W | +100 | 17-66 | 25.8% | 62 | 13 | 20-63 | 31.7% | 39 | 12 | 7/29/2015 | @ INDIANA | 72-84 | L | -140 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 33 | 21 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 38 | 15 | 8/2/2015 | SEATTLE | 78-62 | W | -450 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 43 | 10 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 40 | 17 | 8/7/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 77-63 | W | +170 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 52 | 14 | 20-67 | 29.9% | 43 | 13 | 8/11/2015 | CHICAGO | 84-63 | W | -300 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 42 | 14 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 35 | 17 | 8/14/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 90-78 | W | -210 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 33 | 7 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 36 | 17 | 8/15/2015 | TULSA | 76-81 | L | -360 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 33 | 12 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 44 | 14 | 8/19/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 73-45 | W | -270 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 50 | 15 | 17-63 | 27.0% | 41 | 19 | 8/21/2015 | ATLANTA | 78-67 | W | -500 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 43 | 16 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 41 | 13 | 8/23/2015 | @ INDIANA | 79-80 | L | +120 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 38 | 10 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 37 | 14 | 8/28/2015 | MINNESOTA | 81-68 | W | -165 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 44 | 14 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 38 | 8 | 8/29/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2015 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2015 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/6/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/9/2015 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/22/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 78-77 | W | +280 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 42 | 15 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 50 | 16 | 7/28/2015 | INDIANA | 73-75 | L | -115 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 37 | 18 | 33-81 | 40.7% | 52 | 13 | 7/31/2015 | SEATTLE | 67-66 | W | -300 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 47 | 16 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 40 | 15 | 8/2/2015 | @ INDIANA | 70-83 | L | +200 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 33 | 12 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 43 | 13 | 8/4/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 82-51 | W | -165 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 50 | 17 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 29 | 21 | 8/7/2015 | WASHINGTON | 86-72 | W | +105 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 40 | 9 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 34 | 11 | 8/9/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 73-84 | L | +220 | 22-64 | 34.4% | 38 | 8 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 40 | 11 | 8/12/2015 | TULSA | 80-74 | W | -175 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 43 | 10 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 39 | 13 | 8/14/2015 | NEW YORK | 78-90 | L | +175 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 36 | 17 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 33 | 7 | 8/16/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 77-90 | L | +145 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 33 | 14 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 47 | 12 | 8/21/2015 | @ TULSA | 76-84 | L | +180 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 44 | 14 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 44 | 10 | 8/23/2015 | ATLANTA | 92-102 | L | +120 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 35 | 12 | 40-67 | 59.7% | 34 | 15 | 8/25/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 57-71 | L | +250 | 19-63 | 30.2% | 40 | 12 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 49 | 9 | 8/27/2015 | PHOENIX | 80-81 | L | +250 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 33 | 8 | 28-56 | 50.0% | 42 | 16 | 8/29/2015 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/30/2015 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/4/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/9/2015 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2015 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CONNECTICUT is 38-33 (-3.9 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK since 1997 |
| |
NEW YORK is 7-4 (+1.1 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CONNECTICUT is 23-13 (-2.4 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK since 1997 |
| |
NEW YORK is 3-2 (+1.6 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/14/2015 | NEW YORK | 90 | -5 | SU ATS | 47 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 4-8 | 50.0% | 12-14 | 85.7% | 33 | 9 | 7 | | CONNECTICUT | 78 | 145.5 | Over | 40 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 36 | 2 | 17 | 7/16/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 57 | 147.5 | Under | 33 | 21-70 | 30.0% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 8-11 | 72.7% | 47 | 7 | 15 | | NEW YORK | 64 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 28 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 19-27 | 70.4% | 53 | 7 | 13 | 8/8/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 66 | 149 | Under | 25 | 22-67 | 32.8% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 17-19 | 89.5% | 38 | 9 | 9 | | NEW YORK | 71 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 33 | 20-60 | 33.3% | 0-8 | 0.0% | 31-37 | 83.8% | 55 | 12 | 12 | 6/29/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 65 | 150 | ATS | 31 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 49 | 15 | 16 | | NEW YORK | 67 | -3 | SU Under | 34 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 41 | 6 | 15 | 6/15/2014 | NEW YORK | 72 | -1 | Under | 37 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 17-26 | 65.4% | 43 | 6 | 14 | | CONNECTICUT | 76 | 149.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 18-26 | 69.2% | 46 | 9 | 9 | 6/13/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 83 | 152 | SU ATS | 46 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 8-15 | 53.3% | 19-26 | 73.1% | 43 | 6 | 10 | | NEW YORK | 75 | -6 | Over | 26 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 16-22 | 72.7% | 41 | 10 | 10 | 5/16/2014 | NEW YORK | 75 | 145 | SU ATS | 37 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 44 | 6 | 16 | | CONNECTICUT | 54 | -4 | Under | 31 | 21-70 | 30.0% | 2-15 | 13.3% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 48 | 12 | 18 |
|
| | |
|
Bill is 47-27 against the money line (+18.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 72.3, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 45-37 against the money line (+15.5 Units) in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 72.9, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 77-47 against the money line (+18.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 74.2, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 32-13 against the money line (+17.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 74.5, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 46-35 against the money line (+16.4 Units) in road games after playing a game as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 73.3, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 19-13 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 70.4, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 29-24 against the money line (+9.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 71.3, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 74-76 against the money line (+20.4 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 71.8, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 61-39 against the money line (+21.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 71.3, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 38-34 against the money line (+17.5 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 72.4, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 9-25 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.5, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 6-13 against the money line (-9.7 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 14-27 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.4, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 2-12 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 5*) | Anne is 16-36 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 1-7 against the money line (-7.4 Units) after a close loss by 3 points or less as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.3, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 2-11 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 16-28 against the money line (-21.2 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 73.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 52-74 against the money line (-34.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 74.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 14-37 against the money line (-17.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 23-50 against the money line (-21.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.3, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 24-51 against the money line (-19.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.2, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 12-19 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games versus good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of <=40% in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 74.8, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 35-56 against the money line (-25.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 75.4, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 9-29 against the money line (-17.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 2-14 against the money line (-12.0 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.2, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 10-34 against the money line (-19.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 17-44 against the money line (-21.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.6, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Bill is 2-11 against the money line (-11.9 Units) on Saturday games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 68.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Bill is 11-28 against the money line (-19.5 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 68.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Bill is 7-15 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 67.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Bill is 11-26 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 72.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 5-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in home games after having lost 15 or more of their last 20 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 56-30 against the money line (+18.2 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 76.4, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 75-40 against the money line (+26.8 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 75.0, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 25 times, while the home underdog won straight up 9 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 3 times, while the home underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[F] 06/15/2015 - Rebecca Allen out for season ( Knee ) | |
[G] 08/24/2015 - Alex Bentley out indefinitely ( Ankle ) | [F] 08/15/2015 - Alyssa Thomas out indefinitely ( Shoulder ) | [C] 08/13/2015 - Elizabeth Williams out indefinitely ( Knee ) | [G] 06/05/2015 - Allison Hightower out for season ( Suspension ) | [F] 06/05/2015 - Kelsey Griffin out for season ( Hip ) | [F] 06/04/2015 - Chiney Ogwumike out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/1/2024 10:20:43 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|