| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
SAN ANTONIO
WASHINGTON |
|
|
152
| 85
Final
74 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 655 | SAN ANTONIO | +325 | | 656 | WASHINGTON | -450 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in non-conference games, off a home loss.
(319-224 since 1997.) (58.7%, +81.5 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(182-67 since 1997.) (73.1%, +59.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(253-210 since 1997.) (54.6%, +58.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(145-50 since 1997.) (74.4%, +55.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(155-52 since 1997.) (74.9%, +55.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(211-80 since 1997.) (72.5%, +55.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(162-57 since 1997.) (74%, +55.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(130-41 since 1997.) (76%, +54.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(139-45 since 1997.) (75.5%, +50.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(163-76 since 1997.) (68.2%, +49.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(154-77 since 1997.) (66.7%, +48.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(125-43 since 1997.) (74.4%, +48 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(98-30 since 1997.) (76.6%, +46.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, playing on back-to-back days.
(93-31 since 1997.) (75%, +45.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(110-39 since 1997.) (73.8%, +45.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, on Sunday games.
(130-77 since 1997.) (62.8%, +45 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(129-48 since 1997.) (72.9%, +44.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG).
(88-53 since 1997.) (62.4%, +39.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games.
(114-78 since 1997.) (59.4%, +38 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team, on Sunday games.
(59-12 since 1997.) (83.1%, +34.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, playing on back-to-back days.
(61-17 since 1997.) (78.2%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog.
(25-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +18.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team, on Sunday games.
(49-9 since 1997.) (84.5%, +32 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, playing on back-to-back days.
(74-37 since 1997.) (66.7%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games.
(61-33 since 1997.) (64.9%, +30.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games, on Sunday games.
(59-32 since 1997.) (64.8%, +28.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in non-conference games, off a home cover where the team lost straight up as an underdog.
(26-7 since 1997.) (78.8%, +22.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a straight up loss vs opponent as a favorite of 7 or more against opponent off a home loss.
(29-8 since 1997.) (78.4%, +21.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 4 of their last 5 games against opponent after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(25-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.8%, +17.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(31-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +5.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games against opponent cold team - having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games.
(25-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.3%, +21.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a win by 10 points or more as an underdog.
(27-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after allowing 80 points or more in 4 straight games.
(33-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +5.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(51-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.4%, +10 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(311-308 since 1997.) (50.2%, +72.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(139-100 since 1997.) (58.2%, +44.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(121-63 since 1997.) (65.8%, +38 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games.
(114-78 since 1997.) (59.4%, +38 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, in August or September games.
(30-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +26.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(34-15 since 1997.) (69.4%, +31.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off an upset win as a road underdog, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(52-32 since 1997.) (61.9%, +26.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(47-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +31.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off an upset win as a road underdog, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(34-17 since 1997.) (66.7%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(58-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.7%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(50-29 since 1997.) (63.3%, +17.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(25-13 since 1997.) (65.8%, +17.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - playing on back-to-back days, in August or September games.
(30-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +18 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games.
(35-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.4%, +21.9 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| SAN ANTONIO | 72 | | 27-68 | 40.5% | 5-15 | 31.7% | 13-16 | 78.6% | 43 | 11 | 12 | | WASHINGTON | 80 | | 28-66 | 42.1% | 7-19 | 37.7% | 18-22 | 81.3% | 45 | 11 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON won the game straight up 713 times, while SAN ANTONIO won 261 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 99-164 against the money line (-51.5 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.3, OPPONENT 78.1 | WASHINGTON is 5-12 against the money line (-8.9 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.9, OPPONENT 80.1 | WASHINGTON is 9-15 against the money line (-11.7 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.3, OPPONENT 76.3 | WASHINGTON is 68-107 against the money line (-44.4 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 74.4 | WASHINGTON is 131-205 against the money line (-74.7 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 74.3 | WASHINGTON is 46-93 against the money line (-62.4 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 74.3 | WASHINGTON is 69-111 against the money line (-44.2 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 74.0 | WASHINGTON is 48-63 against the money line (-33.0 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 83.2 |
|
SAN ANTONIO is 1-14 against the money line (-13.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.0, OPPONENT 82.3 | SAN ANTONIO is 42-61 against the money line (-30.7 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.9, OPPONENT 74.5 | SAN ANTONIO is 20-72 against the money line (-67.6 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 69.1, OPPONENT 76.5 | SAN ANTONIO is 13-30 against the money line (-16.8 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.3, OPPONENT 79.0 | SAN ANTONIO is 22-50 against the money line (-28.3 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.4, OPPONENT 80.0 | SAN ANTONIO is 7-43 against the money line (-37.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 85.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 6-23 against the money line (-15.5 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.8, OPPONENT 79.7 | SAN ANTONIO is 4-23 against the money line (-19.7 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 69.4, OPPONENT 80.2 | WASHINGTON is 58-54 against the money line (+21.7 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 72.9 | WASHINGTON is 15-9 against the money line (+11.3 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.2, OPPONENT 72.1 | WASHINGTON is 9-5 against the money line (+11.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 86.6, OPPONENT 80.7 | WASHINGTON is 20-13 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.4, OPPONENT 74.3 |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 10-15 against the money line (-11.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.2, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 3-8 against the money line (-8.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 1-6 against the money line (-6.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 1-7 against the money line (-7.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.1, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 95-159 against the money line (-70.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.1, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 144-218 against the money line (-74.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.9, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 1-6 against the money line (-6.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.4, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 196-300 against the money line (-102.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 2-9 against the money line (-9.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.6, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 1-6 against the money line (-8.3 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-10 against the money line (-10.4 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.9, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 1-7 against the money line (-7.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.1, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 2-11 against the money line (-12.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 34-40 against the money line (-28.1 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.8, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 46-86 against the money line (-36.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
SAN ANTONIO is 91-106 against the money line (-42.6 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.5, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 78-118 against the money line (-54.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.1, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 111-158 against the money line (-65.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 9-28 against the money line (-18.3 Units) in road games vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 10-22 against the money line (-13.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.3, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 12-28 against the money line (-17.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 133-168 against the money line (-59.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 93-151 against the money line (-61.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 106-155 against the money line (-53.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 158-224 against the money line (-73.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 12-48 against the money line (-30.3 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 20-64 against the money line (-33.1 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 84-110 against the money line (-40.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.4, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 119-160 against the money line (-57.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 257-386 against the money line (-114.3 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 152-169 against the money line (-67.3 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.9, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 79-131 against the money line (-44.7 Units) in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 157-234 against the money line (-91.2 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 117-183 against the money line (-61.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 120-200 against the money line (-80.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 32-45 against the money line (-29.0 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 92-143 against the money line (-51.5 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 95-138 against the money line (-46.1 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 52-107 against the money line (-49.9 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 57-112 against the money line (-55.7 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 34-50 against the money line (-26.4 Units) in home games after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 43-90 against the money line (-45.3 Units) after having lost 4 of their last 5 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 26-45 against the money line (-27.1 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 2-7 against the money line (-8.4 Units) off a win by 10 points or more as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.8, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 3-14 against the money line (-14.4 Units) off a win by 15 points or more as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 47-73 against the money line (-30.6 Units) off an upset win as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.8, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-11 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in home games off a win against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.7, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 1-6 against the money line (-8.4 Units) off an upset win by 10 points or more as a road underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.9, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 2-10 against the money line (-11.2 Units) off an upset win by 15 points or more as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 2-7 against the money line (-8.4 Units) off a road win by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 141-248 against the money line (-89.6 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 83-157 against the money line (-57.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 119-190 against the money line (-74.6 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.5, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 27-47 against the money line (-25.2 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 1-7 against the money line (-7.2 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.1, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
SAN ANTONIO is 13-39 against the money line (-18.8 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 69.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 60-105 against the money line (-55.4 Units) in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 72-102 against the money line (-41.4 Units) against Eastern conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 6-26 against the money line (-17.8 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 67.5, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 103-160 against the money line (-71.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.9, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 72-102 against the money line (-41.4 Units) in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 91-136 against the money line (-56.6 Units) after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.4, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 43-69 against the money line (-34.2 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.5, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 6-27 against the money line (-19.1 Units) after having lost 15 or more of their last 20 games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 62.9, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 71-112 against the money line (-46.7 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 5-17 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.9, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 3*) | SAN ANTONIO is 7-19 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.0, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 6-20 against the money line (-14.1 Units) off a home loss over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 35-53 against the money line (-24.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.4, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 68-102 against the money line (-39.1 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 28-43 against the money line (-23.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 67-121 against the money line (-43.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 4-18 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after playing a game as a home underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.4, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 4-22 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 70.9, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 89-127 against the money line (-47.4 Units) after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 35-95 against the money line (-38.3 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 69.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 13-56 against the money line (-37.4 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 67.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 4-17 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 69.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-4 against the money line (+11.3 Units) revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.2, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 8-5 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-4 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 84.0, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 5-19 | -3.8 | 12-12 | 11-13 | 72.4 | 34.2 | 40.4% | 40.3 | 80.6 | 40.1 | 44.1% | 43.9 | | Road Games | 1-11 | -4.8 | 7-5 | 7-5 | 74.0 | 33.6 | 41.3% | 38.1 | 84.3 | 41.7 | 45.8% | 44.2 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -4 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 66.4 | 33.0 | 39.4% | 37.6 | 81.2 | 36.8 | 45.7% | 44.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 72.4 | 34.2 | 27-66 | 40.4% | 5-15 | 30.9% | 14-18 | 78.3% | 40 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82 | 40.6 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 5-16 | 33.8% | 17-21 | 79.7% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 74.0 | 33.6 | 28-67 | 41.3% | 5-14 | 32.2% | 14-18 | 78.0% | 38 | 8 | 15 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.6 | 40.1 | 29-66 | 44.1% | 5-14 | 36.2% | 17-21 | 81.9% | 44 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.7 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 44.5% | 6-16 | 34.4% | 17-21 | 80.0% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 84.3 | 41.7 | 30-66 | 45.8% | 5-15 | 37.7% | 19-22 | 84.5% | 44 | 8 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 10-15 | -0.3 | 12-12 | 18-7 | 80.1 | 40.1 | 42.3% | 41.5 | 82.7 | 41.5 | 44.3% | 42.6 | | Home Games | 4-8 | -2.9 | 5-7 | 8-4 | 79.2 | 41.0 | 43.5% | 39.6 | 80.9 | 41.4 | 45.6% | 40.0 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2.2 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 74.6 | 34.8 | 40.6% | 38.6 | 82.0 | 44.2 | 45.1% | 43.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.1 | 40.1 | 28-66 | 42.3% | 7-19 | 36.4% | 18-22 | 81.4% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82 | 40.6 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 5-16 | 34.0% | 17-21 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 79.2 | 41.0 | 28-65 | 43.5% | 7-19 | 36.7% | 16-20 | 79.4% | 40 | 7 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 2 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.7 | 41.5 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 6-17 | 34.3% | 17-21 | 80.1% | 43 | 10 | 19 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.6 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 44.7% | 5-16 | 34.1% | 17-21 | 80.0% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 80.9 | 41.4 | 29-64 | 45.6% | 6-15 | 36.6% | 16-20 | 81.5% | 40 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: SAN ANTONIO 71.2, WASHINGTON 71.6 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/20/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 69-83 | L | +300 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 36 | 10 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 45 | 11 | | 8/26/2016 | NEW YORK | 77-84 | L | +350 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 47 | 11 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 41 | 11 | | 8/28/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/30/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2016 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/4/2016 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/6/2016 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/9/2016 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2016 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2016 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/20/2016 | NEW YORK | 81-88 | L | +145 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 39 | 13 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 43 | 10 | | 7/22/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 75-95 | L | +325 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 26 | 10 | 34-61 | 55.7% | 41 | 11 | | 8/27/2016 | @ INDIANA | 92-69 | W | +200 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 38 | 13 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 43 | 14 | | 8/28/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/2/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/4/2016 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/7/2016 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/9/2016 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2016 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2016 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| WASHINGTON is 19-17 (+1.8 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 4-2 (+0.6 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| SAN ANTONIO is 10-9 (+3.4 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 2-1 (+0.6 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/6/2016 | WASHINGTON | 70 | -7 | Under | 37 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 5-18 | 27.8% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 44 | 10 | 8 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 77 | 150.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 16-17 | 94.1% | 46 | 12 | 5 | 6/29/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 67 | 153.5 | Under | 27 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 39 | 11 | 11 | | | WASHINGTON | 84 | -9.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 9-19 | 47.4% | 15-15 | 100.0% | 37 | 7 | 7 | 8/5/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 63 | 148.5 | ATS | 38 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 6-13 | 46.2% | 5-6 | 83.3% | 35 | 4 | 9 | | | WASHINGTON | 66 | -10.5 | SU Under | 27 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 46 | 9 | 12 | 7/31/2015 | WASHINGTON | 88 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 49 | 36-63 | 57.1% | 9-15 | 60.0% | 7-12 | 58.3% | 47 | 7 | 14 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 53 | 149 | Under | 27 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 3-8 | 37.5% | 6-10 | 60.0% | 30 | 4 | 12 |
|
| | |
|
Hughes is 26-27 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 1-6 against the money line (-8.3 Units) off a win by 15 points or more as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 2-7 against the money line (-8.8 Units) off an upset win by 10 points or more as a road underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 0-4 against the money line (-7.3 Units) in home games off an upset win by 15 points or more as a road underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 65.8, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 3-8 against the money line (-8.8 Units) off a road win by 10 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 7-13 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in home games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 2-9 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in home games after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 23-41 against the money line (-21.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 1-6 against the money line (-8.3 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 25-38 against the money line (-16.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Hughes is 163-211 against the money line (-53.3 Units) in all games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 49-87 against the money line (-52.5 Units) in August or September games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 64-76 against the money line (-20.9 Units) against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.1, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 79-119 against the money line (-48.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 85-117 against the money line (-47.4 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 64-76 against the money line (-20.9 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.1, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 78-97 against the money line (-26.9 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 36-51 against the money line (-24.4 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 2-16 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after having lost 15 or more of their last 20 games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 60.7, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 58-83 against the money line (-29.7 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 37-52 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 43-63 against the money line (-23.9 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 35-55 against the money line (-22.3 Units) off a home loss as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 83-107 against the money line (-25.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 61-74 against the money line (-20.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 40-54 against the money line (-23.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 26-42 against the money line (-25.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.5, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 86-114 against the money line (-28.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 57-82 against the money line (-27.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 25-36 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 51-92 against the money line (-29.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.3, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 76-94 against the money line (-31.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 86-120 against the money line (-29.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.7, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 11-41 against the money line (-26.2 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 68.8, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 13-37 against the money line (-24.4 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.5, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 20-33 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.2, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 76-76 against the money line (-21.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.5, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 29-33 against the money line (-15.0 Units) when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 62-86 against the money line (-39.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 89-113 against the money line (-45.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 75-87 against the money line (-29.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.7, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 81-97 against the money line (-31.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 117-143 against the money line (-51.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.9, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 51-83 against the money line (-34.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.1, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 76-121 against the money line (-57.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 87-117 against the money line (-37.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 130-168 against the money line (-51.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 31-55 against the money line (-21.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 52-81 against the money line (-30.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 115-126 against the money line (-37.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.1, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 67-76 against the money line (-24.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 79.5, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 73-93 against the money line (-33.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.4, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 105-133 against the money line (-44.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.0, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 23-51 against the money line (-25.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.1, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 38-76 against the money line (-33.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 29-18 against the money line (+18.5 Units) when playing on back-to-back days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 25-22 against the money line (+11.1 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.2, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 44-18 against the money line (+16.9 Units) in home games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.8, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 63-44 against the money line (+19.9 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 75.5, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 20-7 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in home games after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 75.1, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 9-4 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 15-8 against the money line (+12.3 Units) revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.9, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 123-99 against the money line (+25.6 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.4, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 86-69 against the money line (+18.4 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 78.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 16-5 against the money line (+10.1 Units) off a win by 20 points or more over a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 74.5, OPPONENT 64.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 14-10 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 110-91 against the money line (+25.1 Units) after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.0, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 22-20 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 15-10 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 18-16 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.2, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 91-73 against the money line (+17.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 74.4, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 71 times, while the road underdog won straight up 16 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 9 times, while the road underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 08/27/2016 - Alex Montgomery injured last game, doubtful Sunday vs. Wash Mystics ( Knee ) | | [G] 07/06/2016 - Kayla McBride out for season ( Foot ) | | [G] 05/14/2016 - Danielle Robinson out indefinitely ( Achilles ) | |
| [G] 08/28/2016 - Bria Hartley out for season ( Personal ) | | [F] 08/27/2016 - Tianna Hawkins out indefinitely ( Concussion ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/27/2024 10:10:44 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|