WNBA DALLAS Matchup 20160828

You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.

WNBA : Money Line Matchup

Sunday 8/28/2016

Line

$ Line

OU Line

Score

CHICAGO

DALLAS

-2

+105

-125

171.5

92
Final
85

CHICAGO (12 - 13) at DALLAS (9 - 17)

Sunday, 8/28/2016 4:30 PM

Board		Money Line
653	CHICAGO	+105
654	DALLAS	-125

	Current Money Line FoxSheets
	ATS FoxSheet
	First Half FoxSheet
	Money Line FoxSheet
	Teaser Line FoxSheet

BETTING TRENDS

One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time.

(Money)	(0%)	OVER	(0%)
(Money)	(0%)	UNDER	(0%)

STATFOX SUPER SITUATIONS™

StatFox Super Situations favoring DALLAS against the money line

There are 34 situations with a total rating of 69 stars.

- Home favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off a loss against a division rival, in August or September games.
(270-98 since 1997.) (73.4%, +78.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(203-72 since 1997.) (73.8%, +62.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, in August or September games.
(145-48 since 1997.) (75.1%, +58.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(141-50 since 1997.) (73.8%, +57.3 units. Rating = 3*)

- Favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, in August or September games.
(150-50 since 1997.) (75%, +56 units. Rating = 2*)

- Favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(145-55 since 1997.) (72.5%, +51.9 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, in August or September games.
(123-40 since 1997.) (75.5%, +50.8 units. Rating = 2*)

- Favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread.
(160-57 since 1997.) (73.7%, +48.9 units. Rating = 2*)

- Favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(240-99 since 1997.) (70.8%, +48.5 units. Rating = 1*)

- Favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(99-33 since 1997.) (75%, +46 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(93-30 since 1997.) (75.6%, +45.9 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(110-39 since 1997.) (73.8%, +45.6 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, on Sunday games.
(130-77 since 1997.) (62.8%, +45 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(79-50 since 1997.) (61.2%, +38.8 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games.
(114-78 since 1997.) (59.4%, +38 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(63-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.4%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(93-66 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.5%, +44.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread.
(51-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.9%, +27.9 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games, on Sunday games.
(59-32 since 1997.) (64.8%, +28.6 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after a game - shooting 37% or lower, allowing 48% or higher against opponent after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(26-4 since 1997.) (86.7%, +23.5 units. Rating = 5*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(129-96 since 1997.) (57.3%, +22.4 units. Rating = 1*)

- Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after a game - shooting 37% or lower, allowing 48% or higher against opponent after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(39-17 since 1997.) (69.6%, +22.3 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(24-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +18.1 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(71-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.1%, +32.1 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(46-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.7%, +13.6 units. Rating = 0*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(50-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +20.5 units. Rating = 1*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(51-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +24.9 units. Rating = 2*)

- Favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(36-12 since 1997.) (75%, +6.6 units. Rating = 0*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(27-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +21.6 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread.
(80-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (62%, +35 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - cold team - having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a losing record.
(23-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +15.2 units. Rating = 1*)

- Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - cold team - failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(37-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +25.7 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(106-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after 3 straight games being outrebounded by opponent by 5 or more.
(38-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.4%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring CHICAGO against the money line

There are 78 situations with a total rating of 153 stars.

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(311-308 since 1997.) (50.2%, +72.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(70-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.1%, +33.6 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(126-83 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.3%, +54.1 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more.
(293-277 since 1997.) (51.4%, +54.3 units. Rating = 1*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(55-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.1%, +32.8 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(203-206 since 1997.) (49.6%, +48.2 units. Rating = 1*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(114-84 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.6%, +48.3 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(88-84 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.2%, +30.7 units. Rating = 1*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(91-54 since 1997.) (62.8%, +43.5 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(97-64 since 1997.) (60.2%, +39.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points.
(75-42 since 1997.) (64.1%, +39.1 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(80-58 since 1997.) (58%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(53-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.4%, +32.9 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(163-127 since 1997.) (56.2%, +38.2 units. Rating = 1*)

- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(98-55 since 1997.) (64.1%, +36.6 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(45-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +30 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(73-51 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.9%, +33.1 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season, after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(37-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.8%, +22.6 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(73-42 since 1997.) (63.5%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(61-32 since 1997.) (65.6%, +32.4 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 15 points or more.
(101-65 since 1997.) (60.8%, +32.3 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(41-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.1%, +14.7 units. Rating = 0*)

- Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(46-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.7%, +18.9 units. Rating = 1*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(48-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +26.9 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(48-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +26.9 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(48-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +26.9 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(90-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.7%, +35.4 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(30-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (50%, +30.3 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season, after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(31-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.9%, +19.3 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(64-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +38.4 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record.
(30-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +18.9 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(30-18 since 1997.) (62.5%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(114-74 since 1997.) (60.6%, +27.5 units. Rating = 1*)

- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(43-20 since 1997.) (68.3%, +27 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(48-23 since 1997.) (67.6%, +25.8 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record.
(46-23 since 1997.) (66.7%, +25.4 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(30-11 since 1997.) (73.2%, +25 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(41-17 since 1997.) (70.7%, +25 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(73-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +22.6 units. Rating = 1*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(73-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +22.6 units. Rating = 1*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(73-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +22.6 units. Rating = 1*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent after a game - shooting 37% or lower, allowing 48% or higher.
(35-11 since 1997.) (76.1%, +23.9 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(38-15 since 1997.) (71.7%, +23.7 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(56-32 since 1997.) (63.6%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(35-15 since 1997.) (70%, +23.1 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(42-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.5%, +38.3 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(21-10 since 1997.) (67.7%, +22 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(34-16 since 1997.) (68%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games.
(32-12 since 1997.) (72.7%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, on Sunday games.
(27-9 since 1997.) (75%, +19.4 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(35-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (53%, +38.1 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(24-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +22.4 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(24-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +22.4 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(24-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +22.4 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(24-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +25.1 units. Rating = 4*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a horrible defensive team (>=46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(33-11 since 1997.) (75%, +17.4 units. Rating = 1*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a horrible defensive team (>=46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(33-11 since 1997.) (75%, +17.4 units. Rating = 1*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a horrible defensive team (>=46%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(33-11 since 1997.) (75%, +17.4 units. Rating = 1*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(70-63 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.6%, +16 units. Rating = 0*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(44-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +30.8 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(78-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.4%, +40.5 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(71-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +27.9 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(71-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +27.9 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(71-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +27.9 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(80-66 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.8%, +43.5 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(43-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.4%, +10.3 units. Rating = 0*)

- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team.
(21-8 since 1997.) (72.4%, +14.2 units. Rating = 1*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(21-8 since 1997.) (72.4%, +13.9 units. Rating = 1*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(56-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +34.1 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(31-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +5.9 units. Rating = 0*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(51-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.1%, +35.5 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after a game - shooting 37% or lower, allowing 48% or higher against opponent after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(26-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +17.5 units. Rating = 1*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(40-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.2%, +16.8 units. Rating = 0*)

- Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after allowing 80 points or more in 4 straight games.
(33-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +5.6 units. Rating = 0*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(51-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.4%, +10 units. Rating = 0*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games.
(35-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.4%, +21.9 units. Rating = 1*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(43-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.8%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(47-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.5%, +13 units. Rating = 0*)

STATFOX GAME ESTIMATOR™

	Projection		Shooting		3pt Shots		Free Throws		Rebounding
Teams	Score	Edge	FGM-A	Pct.	FGM-A	Pct.	FTM-A	Pct.	Tot.	OFF	TO
CHICAGO	89		36-74	48.0%	4-12	38.2%	14-16	82.9%	48	14	13
DALLAS	85		29-71	40.4%	7-22	33.4%	20-25	79.9%	42	13	11

The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated.

In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 617 times, while DALLAS won 358 times.
Edge against the money line=CHICAGO

Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line

CHICAGO is 55-36 against the money line (+17.1 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.7, OPPONENT 78.6

CHICAGO is 40-22 against the money line (+14.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.0, OPPONENT 83.1

CHICAGO is 25-8 against the money line (+12.6 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 91.8, OPPONENT 84.1

DALLAS is 7-16 against the money line (-14.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was DALLAS 84.5, OPPONENT 89.0

DALLAS is 2-6 against the money line (-8.3 Units) when they attempt 23 to 27 free throws in a game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 89.1

DALLAS is 6-17 against the money line (-17.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 90.1

DALLAS is 3-15 against the money line (-18.6 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 85.9, OPPONENT 93.2

DALLAS is 1-6 against the money line (-7.4 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 78.3, OPPONENT 86.1

DALLAS is 9-15 against the money line (-11.7 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 86.2, OPPONENT 88.6

DALLAS is 4-7 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in home games when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 88.3, OPPONENT 89.3

DALLAS is 2-12 against the money line (-17.4 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 88.6

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring DALLAS to win against the money line

CHICAGO is 95-135 against the money line (-68.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 79.4

CHICAGO is 3-11 against the money line (-11.3 Units) in road games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 83.1

CHICAGO is 25-54 against the money line (-38.7 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 78.4

CHICAGO is 35-48 against the money line (-30.7 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 77.4

CHICAGO is 6-12 against the money line (-13.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.8, OPPONENT 88.8

CHICAGO is 4-10 against the money line (-10.9 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.5, OPPONENT 91.4

CHICAGO is 58-88 against the money line (-52.8 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 78.5

CHICAGO is 9-12 against the money line (-9.5 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.7, OPPONENT 86.4

STATFOX MATCHUP POWER TRENDS™

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line

There are 16 trends with a total rating of 54 stars.

CHICAGO is 15-4 against the money line (+9.4 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.6, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*)

DALLAS is 1-8 against the money line (-12.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 79.8, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 6*)

DALLAS is 5-15 against the money line (-15.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 4*)

DALLAS is 2-9 against the money line (-12.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 80.3, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 5*)

DALLAS is 1-5 against the money line (-9.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 79.0, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 3*)

DALLAS is 3-11 against the money line (-15.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 80.9, OPPONENT 88.1 - (Rating = 6*)

DALLAS is 0-10 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season this season.
The average score was DALLAS 82.3, OPPONENT 90.8 - (Rating = 2*)

DALLAS is 2-8 against the money line (-11.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 80.1, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 4*)

DALLAS is 6-13 against the money line (-12.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 84.6, OPPONENT 89.5 - (Rating = 2*)

DALLAS is 2-7 against the money line (-10.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 78.2, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 3*)

DALLAS is 6-11 against the money line (-10.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 85.1, OPPONENT 89.5 - (Rating = 1*)

DALLAS is 2-8 against the money line (-11.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 80.1, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 4*)

DALLAS is 6-15 against the money line (-14.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 89.8 - (Rating = 3*)

DALLAS is 2-8 against the money line (-11.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 80.1, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 4*)

DALLAS is 5-15 against the money line (-15.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 89.8 - (Rating = 4*)

DALLAS is 1-7 against the money line (-8.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 79.4, OPPONENT 90.5 - (Rating = 2*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring DALLAS to win against the money line

There are 16 trends with a total rating of 15 stars.

CHICAGO is 76-77 against the money line (-40.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 42-47 against the money line (-29.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 50-81 against the money line (-40.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 75-123 against the money line (-64.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 39-58 against the money line (-32.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 58-90 against the money line (-56.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 49-81 against the money line (-43.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 71-115 against the money line (-64.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 71-115 against the money line (-55.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 22-27 against the money line (-22.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 41-46 against the money line (-30.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 55-63 against the money line (-30.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 100-146 against the money line (-52.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 57-104 against the money line (-39.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 29-45 against the money line (-25.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 41-62 against the money line (-35.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*)

STATFOX SITUATIONAL POWER TRENDS™

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line

There are 39 trends with a total rating of 99 stars.

DALLAS is 9-17 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 2*)

DALLAS is 3-5 against the money line (-10.8 Units) as a favorite this season.
The average score was DALLAS 85.9, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 1*)

DALLAS is 3-5 against the money line (-10.8 Units) as a home favorite this season.
The average score was DALLAS 85.9, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 1*)

DALLAS is 5-8 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in home games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 86.2, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 1*)

DALLAS is 5-8 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season.
The average score was DALLAS 86.2, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 1*)

DALLAS is 4-8 against the money line (-12.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season.
The average score was DALLAS 86.6, OPPONENT 89.7 - (Rating = 3*)

DALLAS is 2-11 against the money line (-16.9 Units) against Eastern conference opponents this season.
The average score was DALLAS 84.5, OPPONENT 88.2 - (Rating = 7*)

DALLAS is 4-8 against the money line (-10.6 Units) after a division game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 89.3, OPPONENT 91.3 - (Rating = 2*)

DALLAS is 2-10 against the money line (-9.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 91.6 - (Rating = 2*)

DALLAS is 7-13 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher this season.
The average score was DALLAS 84.8, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 2*)

DALLAS is 6-12 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher this season.
The average score was DALLAS 85.3, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 2*)

DALLAS is 6-11 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher this season.
The average score was DALLAS 86.0, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 1*)

DALLAS is 2-11 against the money line (-16.9 Units) in non-conference games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 84.5, OPPONENT 88.2 - (Rating = 7*)

DALLAS is 2-6 against the money line (-7.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season.
The average score was DALLAS 84.8, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*)

DALLAS is 1-7 against the money line (-8.0 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread this season.
The average score was DALLAS 81.3, OPPONENT 89.1 - (Rating = 2*)

DALLAS is 8-16 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 3*)

DALLAS is 7-16 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 84.3, OPPONENT 89.8 - (Rating = 3*)

DALLAS is 6-16 against the money line (-16.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 4*)

DALLAS is 6-15 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 89.8 - (Rating = 3*)

DALLAS is 8-16 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 88.6 - (Rating = 3*)

DALLAS is 8-14 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 2*)

DALLAS is 7-13 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 85.8, OPPONENT 89.7 - (Rating = 2*)

DALLAS is 6-12 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 85.4, OPPONENT 89.9 - (Rating = 2*)

DALLAS is 5-13 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more this season.
The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 88.6 - (Rating = 3*)

DALLAS is 3-11 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 88.9 - (Rating = 4*)

DALLAS is 2-9 against the money line (-11.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 90.1 - (Rating = 4*)

DALLAS is 3-9 against the money line (-9.2 Units) after allowing 90 points or more this season.
The average score was DALLAS 81.4, OPPONENT 88.9 - (Rating = 2*)

DALLAS is 2-11 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 79.6, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 6*)

DALLAS is 8-12 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season.
The average score was DALLAS 85.0, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 0*)

DALLAS is 8-12 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 85.0, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 0*)

DALLAS is 2-6 against the money line (-10.0 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 84.6, OPPONENT 88.6 - (Rating = 2*)

DALLAS is 7-14 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season.
The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 2*)

DALLAS is 6-10 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 86.6, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 1*)

DALLAS is 2-13 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season.
The average score was DALLAS 80.5, OPPONENT 89.8 - (Rating = 5*)

DALLAS is 4-12 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season.
The average score was DALLAS 79.8, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 2*)

DALLAS is 2-9 against the money line (-9.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses this season.
The average score was DALLAS 80.5, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 3*)

DALLAS is 1-7 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses this season.
The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 91.5 - (Rating = 3*)

DALLAS is 3-7 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 88.1 - (Rating = 2*)

DALLAS is 1-6 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was DALLAS 80.9, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 3*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring DALLAS to win against the money line

There are 47 trends with a total rating of 45 stars.

CHICAGO is 163-206 against the money line (-61.4 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 13-26 against the money line (-18.0 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.5, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 103-130 against the money line (-50.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 6-10 against the money line (-9.7 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 19-33 against the money line (-25.0 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 8-14 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.5, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 6-11 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 4-8 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 13-26 against the money line (-18.0 Units) in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.5, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 24-30 against the money line (-20.4 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 36-46 against the money line (-23.6 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 11-15 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 4-9 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 6-10 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 16-29 against the money line (-24.9 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 83-130 against the money line (-64.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 62-99 against the money line (-51.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 31-37 against the money line (-22.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.5, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 56-84 against the money line (-38.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 38-53 against the money line (-27.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 5-9 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 2-6 against the money line (-7.6 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 52-73 against the money line (-40.6 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 30-49 against the money line (-32.0 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 20-30 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 8-12 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 7-11 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.8, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 36-53 against the money line (-31.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 25-37 against the money line (-22.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 8-11 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 9-12 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.6, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 15-18 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 11-18 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 17-22 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.0, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 4-8 against the money line (-7.9 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.1, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 9-14 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after scoring 90 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 9-12 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.6, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 13-16 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 17-29 against the money line (-22.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 14-17 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-8.6 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 2*)

CHICAGO is 51-72 against the money line (-32.2 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 3-11 against the money line (-10.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 69-106 against the money line (-47.2 Units) after playing a home game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-6.8 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 11-15 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 9-27 against the money line (-28.8 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 71.5, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 5*)

ADVANCED TEAM STATS

CHICAGO - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team				Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.
All Games	12-13	-8.5	11-14	16-9	84.8	43.9	45.8%	43.9	84.4	41.4	43.3%	41.0
Road Games	5-7	-5.7	7-5	7-5	83.6	46.1	45.6%	44.1	84.3	40.7	42.8%	41.3
Last 5 Games	4-1	+2.6	4-1	3-2	86.6	43.6	45.6%	45.4	83.6	35.8	44.9%	39.6

CHICAGO Team Statistics
			Shooting		3pt Shooting		Free Throws		Rebounding
	PPG	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	PCT	FTM-A	Pct	Tot	Off	Ast	PF	Stl	TO	Bk
Team Stats (All Games)	84.8	43.9	33-72	45.8%	4-11	38.8%	15-18	83.1%	44	10	18	19	6	12	5
vs opponents surrendering	81.9	40.6	30-68	44.2%	5-16	33.8%	17-21	79.8%	42	9	18	20	7	13	4
Team Stats (Road Games)	83.6	46.1	32-71	45.6%	5-12	42.3%	14-17	83.5%	44	9	17	20	6	12	4
Stats Against (All Games)	84.4	41.4	29-68	43.3%	7-19	34.8%	19-24	80.5%	41	8	19	18	7	11	4
vs opponents averaging	82.1	40.4	30-67	44.1%	6-16	33.8%	17-22	79.5%	42	9	18	20	8	13	4
Stats Against (Road Games)	84.3	40.7	30-69	42.8%	7-20	34.3%	18-23	80.3%	41	9	18	16	7	10	4

DALLAS - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team				Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.
All Games	9-17	-13.7	10-16	17-9	84.1	41.8	40.2%	44.0	88.5	45.2	47.8%	43.9
Home Games	5-8	-11.4	4-9	10-3	86.2	42.3	42.0%	44.5	88.7	44.8	48.5%	40.5
Last 5 Games	0-5	-7	1-4	2-3	82.4	42.4	39.7%	39.0	92.4	48.6	49.4%	50.4

DALLAS Team Statistics
			Shooting		3pt Shooting		Free Throws		Rebounding
	PPG	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	PCT	FTM-A	Pct	Tot	Off	Ast	PF	Stl	TO	Bk
Team Stats (All Games)	84.1	41.8	28-71	40.2%	7-22	33.3%	20-25	79.9%	44	12	16	20	7	13	3
vs opponents surrendering	81.7	40.4	30-68	43.8%	6-16	34.2%	17-21	80.1%	42	9	17	20	7	13	4
Team Stats (Home Games)	86.2	42.3	29-70	42.0%	6-19	34.4%	21-27	79.1%	44	12	16	20	7	13	3
Stats Against (All Games)	88.5	45.2	33-68	47.8%	5-14	33.6%	18-23	79.3%	44	9	19	22	8	13	6
vs opponents averaging	82.3	40.7	30-67	44.6%	5-15	33.9%	17-21	80.0%	42	9	18	20	8	13	4
Stats Against (Home Games)	88.7	44.8	33-67	48.5%	5-15	30.9%	19-23	81.6%	40	9	19	23	8	14	6

Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 71.5, DALLAS 72.3

SCHEDULE AND RESULTS

CHICAGO - Season Results Against the Money Line
					Team Stats				Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	SU	Money	Shots	Pct	REB	TO	Shots	Pct	REB	TO
7/19/2016	@ PHOENIX	79-77	W	+170	28-68	41.2%	43	8	31-66	47.0%	42	12
7/22/2016	CONNECTICUT	89-94	L	-210	34-65	52.3%	37	15	32-70	45.7%	39	7
8/26/2016	ATLANTA	90-82	W	-210	32-79	40.5%	50	7	27-59	45.8%	41	12
8/28/2016	@ DALLAS
9/2/2016	SEATTLE
9/4/2016	SAN ANTONIO
9/7/2016	@ WASHINGTON
9/9/2016	@ INDIANA
9/11/2016	@ CONNECTICUT
9/13/2016	MINNESOTA

DALLAS - Season Results Against the Money Line
					Team Stats				Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	SU	Money	Shots	Pct	REB	TO	Shots	Pct	REB	TO
7/20/2016	CONNECTICUT	78-89	L	-300	28-73	38.4%	38	9	34-69	49.3%	46	12
7/22/2016	@ ATLANTA	88-93	L	+100	31-75	41.3%	39	10	33-67	49.3%	59	14
8/26/2016	@ PHOENIX	72-98	L	+200	24-68	35.3%	36	9	36-63	57.1%	44	10
8/28/2016	CHICAGO
8/31/2016	@ SEATTLE
9/2/2016	LOS ANGELES
9/4/2016	WASHINGTON
9/9/2016	@ SAN ANTONIO
9/11/2016	NEW YORK

HEAD-TO-HEAD HISTORY

All games in this series since 1997

DALLAS is 16-10 (+5.0 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997

Games over the last 3 seasons

DALLAS is 3-3 (+0.2 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons

All games played at DALLAS since 1997

DALLAS is 9-3 (+6.1 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997

Games played at DALLAS over the last 3 seasons.

DALLAS is 2-1 (+1.0 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons

						Shooting		3pt shots		Free Throws		Rebounds
Date	Teams	Score	Line	Result	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	Pct	FTM-A	Pct	Tot.	OFF	TO
7/15/2016	DALLAS	77	171.5	Under	35	26-69	37.7%	10-27	37.0%	15-19	78.9%	41	11	10
	CHICAGO	84	-6	SU ATS	38	34-73	46.6%	6-16	37.5%	10-14	71.4%	49	11	9
5/29/2016	CHICAGO	92	-1.5	SU ATS	56	41-70	58.6%	4-7	57.1%	6-7	85.7%	39	8	13
	DALLAS	87	171.5	Over	47	26-75	34.7%	11-27	40.7%	24-27	88.9%	43	13	12
9/11/2015	TULSA	71	159	Over	47	25-64	39.1%	4-16	25.0%	17-23	73.9%	46	13	15
	CHICAGO	92	-6	SU ATS	51	35-72	48.6%	7-16	43.7%	15-21	71.4%	42	10	7
6/6/2015	CHICAGO	93	166.5	Over	43	34-66	51.5%	5-17	29.4%	20-22	90.9%	33	8	15
	TULSA	101	-2	SU ATS	62	34-70	48.6%	10-14	71.4%	23-27	85.2%	41	12	15

COACHING TRENDS

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line

There are 75 trends with a total rating of 132 stars.

Chatman is 32-22 against the money line (+14.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Williams is 39-57 against the money line (-19.3 Units) in all games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.3, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Williams is 14-23 against the money line (-16.5 Units) against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.5, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Williams is 20-36 against the money line (-22.5 Units) after a division game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Williams is 9-18 against the money line (-12.3 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 78.0, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Williams is 2-14 against the money line (-18.5 Units) after a game - shooting 37% or lower, allowing 48% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 74.9, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 6*)

Williams is 16-34 against the money line (-22.5 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 2*)

Williams is 13-29 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 3*)

Williams is 11-26 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 88.4 - (Rating = 3*)

Williams is 13-26 against the money line (-19.5 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 78.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Williams is 14-23 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.5, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Williams is 4-15 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.2, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Williams is 5-18 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 2*)

Williams is 2-12 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 79.9, OPPONENT 88.4 - (Rating = 3*)

Williams is 8-23 against the money line (-18.2 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.4, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 3*)

Williams is 13-21 against the money line (-15.3 Units) off a road loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 78.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Williams is 3-9 against the money line (-8.6 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.5, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Williams is 2-8 against the money line (-9.5 Units) off a blowout loss by 20 points or more to a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 78.0, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Williams is 24-34 against the money line (-19.4 Units) off a road loss in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 77.4, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Williams is 7-13 against the money line (-12.2 Units) off 2 or more consecutive road losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 78.1, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Williams is 11-17 against the money line (-15.3 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 76.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Williams is 4-11 against the money line (-13.3 Units) off a road blowout loss by 20 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 74.5, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*)

Williams is 21-42 against the money line (-25.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Williams is 18-35 against the money line (-21.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Williams is 15-31 against the money line (-21.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 3*)

Williams is 12-28 against the money line (-22.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 3*)

Williams is 27-46 against the money line (-23.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.8, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Williams is 21-36 against the money line (-19.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Williams is 16-31 against the money line (-21.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*)

Williams is 12-27 against the money line (-21.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 3*)

Williams is 11-23 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 2*)

Williams is 19-37 against the money line (-20.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Williams is 13-26 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.4, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Williams is 8-20 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.5, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 2*)

Williams is 9-26 against the money line (-22.5 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.5, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 4*)

Williams is 5-13 against the money line (-10.0 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.5, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Williams is 3-9 against the money line (-8.2 Units) after a blowout loss by 15 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.2, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Williams is 1-6 against the money line (-7.0 Units) after a blowout loss by 20 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.1, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Williams is 10-20 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Williams is 30-42 against the money line (-23.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 79.9, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Williams is 16-24 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.4, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Williams is 10-20 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Williams is 8-36 against the money line (-31.3 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 78.6, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 5*)

Williams is 4-21 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 79.6, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Williams is 6-16 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 81.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Williams is 15-39 against the money line (-25.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 79.4, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 3*)

Williams is 10-26 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.5, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Williams is 6-18 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.3, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Williams is 4-13 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after 4 or more consecutive losses as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 79.4, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Williams is 16-27 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 79.0, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Williams is 11-22 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 78.8, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Williams is 12-24 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Williams is 23-25 against the money line (-20.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 77.8, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Williams is 13-30 against the money line (-21.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 78.2, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 3*)

Williams is 25-47 against the money line (-25.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 79.9, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Williams is 9-23 against the money line (-15.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 76.0, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Williams is 12-26 against the money line (-20.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 77.9, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 3*)

Williams is 24-40 against the money line (-20.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 78.4, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Williams is 15-28 against the money line (-17.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 77.9, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*)

Williams is 27-46 against the money line (-24.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 78.5, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*)

Williams is 3-12 against the money line (-13.3 Units) versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 71.1, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 3*)

Williams is 5-16 against the money line (-12.3 Units) versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 75.3, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Williams is 19-36 against the money line (-26.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 74.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*)

Williams is 34-50 against the money line (-24.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 77.5, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Williams is 2-16 against the money line (-20.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 79.1, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 7*)

Williams is 6-19 against the money line (-17.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 4*)

Williams is 14-28 against the money line (-20.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 78.7, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 2*)

Williams is 25-43 against the money line (-23.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.5, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Williams is 7-18 against the money line (-18.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 79.6, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 4*)

Williams is 14-28 against the money line (-21.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 3*)

Williams is 13-27 against the money line (-18.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 79.2, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Williams is 22-42 against the money line (-21.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.1, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Williams is 6-18 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 79.0, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 3*)

Williams is 13-31 against the money line (-19.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.6, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*)

Williams is 18-35 against the money line (-15.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 79.3, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring DALLAS to win against the money line

There are 57 trends with a total rating of 81 stars.

Chatman is 103-103 against the money line (-30.7 Units) in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 29-44 against the money line (-29.0 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 64-73 against the money line (-38.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 23-38 against the money line (-17.6 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 21-37 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 12-22 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in road games after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 29-44 against the money line (-29.0 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 49-53 against the money line (-27.0 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 27-34 against the money line (-28.3 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 17-18 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 14-20 against the money line (-14.1 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 54-64 against the money line (-33.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 38-51 against the money line (-30.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 57-65 against the money line (-36.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 36-42 against the money line (-22.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 22-28 against the money line (-20.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 38-49 against the money line (-33.1 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 21-37 against the money line (-21.6 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 14-28 against the money line (-18.1 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 9-23 against the money line (-17.1 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 3*)

Chatman is 37-42 against the money line (-20.3 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 59-61 against the money line (-21.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 36-38 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 8-17 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 38-49 against the money line (-30.6 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 12-20 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 14-19 against the money line (-16.6 Units) after scoring 90 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 47-57 against the money line (-30.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 23-32 against the money line (-24.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 25-31 against the money line (-21.3 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 5-10 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 6-18 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 4*)

Chatman is 46-52 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 10-24 against the money line (-23.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 4*)

Chatman is 7-14 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 3*)

Chatman is 13-24 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in road games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 7-17 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in road games after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.6, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 50-41 against the money line (-25.6 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 28-26 against the money line (-17.5 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 26-43 against the money line (-28.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 42-61 against the money line (-34.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 20-25 against the money line (-17.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 32-43 against the money line (-36.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*)

Chatman is 28-38 against the money line (-22.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 41-54 against the money line (-35.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 51-57 against the money line (-17.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 80-85 against the money line (-31.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 34-44 against the money line (-19.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 45-65 against the money line (-41.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 3*)

Chatman is 14-18 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 26-30 against the money line (-21.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 75-76 against the money line (-23.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Chatman is 39-41 against the money line (-21.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 61-73 against the money line (-24.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 37-59 against the money line (-26.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Chatman is 26-38 against the money line (-23.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*)

Chatman is 37-51 against the money line (-30.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*)

STATFOX LINE TRACKER™

Here is a summary of past results against the money line in games where the line movement was similar to:

Opening Money Line: Home=-115 (Road=+-105), Closing Money Line: Home=-125 (Road=+105)

Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 73 times, while the road underdog won straight up 50 times. No Edge.

Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 2 times, while the road underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge.

KEY PLAYER INJURIES

CHICAGO

[G] 06/08/2016 - Betnijah Laney out for season ( Knee )

DALLAS

No significant injuries.

Last Updated: 5/2/2024 8:09:48 AM EST.