| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
SEATTLE
MINNESOTA |
|
|
155.5
| 80
Final
92 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 657 | SEATTLE | +450 | | 658 | MINNESOTA | -650 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(320-122 since 1997.) (72.4%, +67.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more.
(146-41 since 1997.) (78.1%, +60.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games.
(146-37 since 1997.) (79.8%, +59.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 20 or more of their last 25 games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(115-34 since 1997.) (77.2%, +49.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 20 or more of their last 25 games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(115-34 since 1997.) (77.2%, +49.2 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(144-74 since 1997.) (66.1%, +48.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more.
(98-25 since 1997.) (79.7%, +47.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(97-20 since 1997.) (82.9%, +46.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(77-19 since 1997.) (80.2%, +40.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(73-15 since 1997.) (83%, +36.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(69-14 since 1997.) (83.1%, +35.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(43-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.8%, +20.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(84-36 since 1997.) (70%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents.
(50-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +32 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(53-8 since 1997.) (86.9%, +31.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents.
(25-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.8%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(79-35 since 1997.) (69.3%, +26.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents.
(33-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +19.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents.
(37-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +30 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 20 or more of their last 25 games, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a marginal losing team (40% to 49%).
(25-2 since 1997.) (92.6%, +22.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 20 or more of their last 25 games, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) after 15 or more games.
(25-2 since 1997.) (92.6%, +22.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, in August or September games.
(34-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.7%, +16.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents.
(27-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.1%, +19.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(25-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.2%, +26.8 units. Rating = 6*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(55-27 since 1997.) (67.1%, +20 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents.
(34-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +15.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(30-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.2%, +24.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(71-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.1%, +32.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog against opponent off an upset loss as a road favorite.
(28-12 since 1997.) (70%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(56-27 since 1997.) (67.5%, +17.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(46-22 since 1997.) (67.6%, +17.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(53-33 since 1997.) (61.6%, +17.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(26-5 since 1997.) (83.9%, +15.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(26-9 since 1997.) (74.3%, +14.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(30-11 since 1997.) (73.2%, +13.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(28-13 since 1997.) (68.3%, +12.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(46-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.7%, +13.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, with a losing record.
(26-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.3%, +9.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(106-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(88-84 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.2%, +30.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(78-69 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.1%, +30.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots against opponent after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots.
(42-30 since 1997.) (58.3%, +29.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(90-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.7%, +35.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(73-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +22.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(73-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +22.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(73-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +22.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(27-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (73%, +25.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(27-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (73%, +25.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(27-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (73%, +25.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(52-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.1%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(42-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.6%, +31.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(71-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +27.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(71-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +27.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(71-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +27.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - off a home win against a division rival against opponent after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points.
(49-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +17.8 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| SEATTLE | 73 | | 27-62 | 43.1% | 7-20 | 33.6% | 13-16 | 81.7% | 34 | 6 | 15 | | MINNESOTA | 87 | | 34-71 | 47.9% | 4-14 | 31.8% | 15-19 | 81.7% | 47 | 14 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 835 times, while SEATTLE won 147 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
SEATTLE is 4-1 against the money line (+10.3 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.4, OPPONENT 79.8 | SEATTLE is 113-88 against the money line (+29.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.8, OPPONENT 80.6 | SEATTLE is 61-40 against the money line (+21.0 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 71.3 | MINNESOTA is 12-8 against the money line (-20.7 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.7, OPPONENT 74.9 | MINNESOTA is 63-76 against the money line (-41.4 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.1, OPPONENT 74.3 | MINNESOTA is 16-11 against the money line (-20.3 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.8, OPPONENT 75.2 | MINNESOTA is 63-71 against the money line (-33.6 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.9, OPPONENT 77.0 |
|
SEATTLE is 31-80 against the money line (-72.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.2, OPPONENT 76.9 | SEATTLE is 63-80 against the money line (-34.1 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 69.7, OPPONENT 70.1 | SEATTLE is 7-38 against the money line (-29.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.5, OPPONENT 85.1 | SEATTLE is 1-19 against the money line (-18.8 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.9, OPPONENT 89.2 | SEATTLE is 3-16 against the money line (-14.2 Units) when they grab 32 to 36 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.4, OPPONENT 82.8 | SEATTLE is 2-13 against the money line (-11.7 Units) when they grab 10+ fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.4, OPPONENT 82.6 | MINNESOTA is 19-5 against the money line (+12.3 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 76.7 | MINNESOTA is 22-0 against the money line (+22.4 Units) when they grab 10+ more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 71.4 | MINNESOTA is 186-64 against the money line (+95.2 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.8, OPPONENT 78.7 | MINNESOTA is 140-31 against the money line (+102.8 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 90.1, OPPONENT 79.9 |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 92-86 against the money line (+21.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.5, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 131-126 against the money line (+22.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.6, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 42-39 against the money line (+25.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 105-90 against the money line (+20.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.9, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 160-137 against the money line (+30.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 17-12 against the money line (-20.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.1, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 5-5 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.7, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 9-8 against the money line (-17.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.9, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 21-14 against the money line (-21.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 29-18 against the money line (-24.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.5, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 20-16 against the money line (-19.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.8, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 19-14 against the money line (-21.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.2, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 27-18 against the money line (-23.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.3, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 101-104 against the money line (-50.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.6, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 19-13 against the money line (-22.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 28-17 against the money line (-23.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 4-13 against the money line (-10.2 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 3-10 against the money line (-8.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.2, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 22-41 against the money line (-22.0 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 69.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 15-6 against the money line (+8.1 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.0, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 19-7 against the money line (+10.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.6, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 6-3 against the money line (+10.2 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.8, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 103-92 against the money line (+22.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.1, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 138-153 against the money line (+24.7 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.2, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 7-9 against the money line (-13.0 Units) on Sunday games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 168-157 against the money line (-78.0 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.6, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 106-111 against the money line (-48.2 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 56-75 against the money line (-46.1 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.4, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 53-42 against the money line (-32.3 Units) in home games after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.1, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 70-65 against the money line (-39.6 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.8, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 9-9 against the money line (-19.3 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.7, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 2-4 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 73-92 against the money line (-54.3 Units) off a road loss since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 72.6, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 136-129 against the money line (-53.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.8, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 46-41 against the money line (-31.0 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.7, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 136-150 against the money line (-80.9 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.4, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 5-4 against the money line (-20.3 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.5, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 126-151 against the money line (-69.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.2, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 5-16 against the money line (-13.0 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog of 6 or more since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 68.0, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 2-8 against the money line (-8.0 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 69.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 4-14 against the money line (-12.9 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as a home underdog since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 66.8, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 1-9 against the money line (-11.6 Units) off an upset win as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 2-9 against the money line (-8.7 Units) off a win against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 67.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 1-6 against the money line (-7.5 Units) off an upset win as a home underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.0, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 3-11 against the money line (-10.0 Units) off a home win over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 38-69 against the money line (-30.6 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 25-45 against the money line (-23.6 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.2, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 17-33 against the money line (-23.4 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 15-26 against the money line (-20.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 4-14 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in road games after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.9, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 9-18 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 8-19 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 4-12 against the money line (-9.6 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 1-8 against the money line (-7.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.6, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 1-8 against the money line (-8.3 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 67.7, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 28-8 against the money line (+13.0 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.0, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 59-20 against the money line (+28.5 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.3, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 42-13 against the money line (+22.2 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 68-37 against the money line (+23.6 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 25-8 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 24-2 against the money line (+18.2 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 21-1 against the money line (+18.8 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 17-1 against the money line (+14.8 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 33-6 against the money line (+22.2 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 17-2 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 51-11 against the money line (+22.9 Units) in home games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 11-1 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after a game where a team made 15% of their 3 point shots or worse over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.5, OPPONENT 68.5 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 10-15 | +0.8 | 12-13 | 12-12 | 80.0 | 39.4 | 45.9% | 37.5 | 80.8 | 39.8 | 44.8% | 40.9 | | Road Games | 3-8 | -1.3 | 5-6 | 3-8 | 75.0 | 36.0 | 44.0% | 36.7 | 81.2 | 39.0 | 44.8% | 40.3 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +3.2 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 80.4 | 35.2 | 45.8% | 39.0 | 72.4 | 35.6 | 41.3% | 43.4 | | Division Games | 5-7 | +4.4 | 7-5 | 5-7 | 78.0 | 38.8 | 44.1% | 38.6 | 80.6 | 41.2 | 45.7% | 39.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.0 | 39.4 | 29-62 | 45.9% | 7-20 | 35.5% | 16-19 | 82.4% | 37 | 6 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.9 | 40.6 | 30-67 | 44.2% | 5-16 | 34.0% | 17-21 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 75.0 | 36.0 | 26-60 | 44.0% | 6-19 | 31.9% | 16-19 | 83.8% | 37 | 6 | 17 | 19 | 6 | 16 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.8 | 39.8 | 30-68 | 44.8% | 5-16 | 34.6% | 14-18 | 79.3% | 41 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.7 | 40.4 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 5-16 | 33.2% | 17-21 | 79.5% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 81.2 | 39.0 | 29-66 | 44.8% | 5-15 | 31.3% | 18-21 | 82.2% | 40 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 21-5 | -9.2 | 14-12 | 14-12 | 85.6 | 43.9 | 47.1% | 43.8 | 76.1 | 38.6 | 40.9% | 39.8 | | Home Games | 11-2 | -3.7 | 7-6 | 7-6 | 85.7 | 44.3 | 47.4% | 43.7 | 73.5 | 35.5 | 39.3% | 40.2 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +0.7 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 85.6 | 44.0 | 47.4% | 44.0 | 77.6 | 40.6 | 42.1% | 38.6 | | Division Games | 12-1 | +8.1 | 8-5 | 6-7 | 85.6 | 44.2 | 46.9% | 45.5 | 74.3 | 37.2 | 41.0% | 37.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 85.6 | 43.9 | 32-69 | 47.1% | 4-13 | 31.3% | 16-20 | 81.2% | 44 | 9 | 20 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.8 | 41 | 30-68 | 44.5% | 5-16 | 34.3% | 17-21 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 85.7 | 44.3 | 32-68 | 47.4% | 4-14 | 31.6% | 17-21 | 80.6% | 44 | 9 | 21 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.1 | 38.6 | 27-67 | 40.9% | 6-18 | 31.5% | 16-20 | 80.4% | 40 | 8 | 15 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.9 | 40.5 | 30-67 | 43.9% | 6-17 | 34.3% | 17-21 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 73.5 | 35.5 | 26-67 | 39.3% | 6-18 | 31.2% | 15-19 | 82.2% | 40 | 9 | 15 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: SEATTLE 71.7, MINNESOTA 70.8 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/20/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 83-69 | W | -400 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 45 | 11 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 36 | 10 | | 7/22/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | 72-79 | L | +500 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 32 | 14 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 46 | 11 | | 8/26/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 79-72 | W | +325 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 40 | 12 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 41 | 17 | | 8/28/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/31/2016 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/2/2016 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/4/2016 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/7/2016 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/9/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2016 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/20/2016 | ATLANTA | 83-65 | W | -1050 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 39 | 12 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 38 | 17 | | 7/22/2016 | SEATTLE | 79-72 | W | -750 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 46 | 11 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 32 | 14 | | 8/26/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 80-84 | L | -330 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 41 | 18 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 40 | 14 | | 8/28/2016 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/2/2016 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/4/2016 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/6/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2016 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| SEATTLE is 31-37 (+1.0 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 9-3 (+2.2 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| MINNESOTA is 25-9 (+7.0 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 6-0 (+6.0 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/22/2016 | SEATTLE | 72 | 159.5 | ATS | 36 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 20-23 | 87.0% | 32 | 7 | 14 | | | MINNESOTA | 79 | -11.5 | SU Under | 38 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 18-20 | 90.0% | 46 | 12 | 11 | 6/19/2016 | MINNESOTA | 96 | -11 | SU ATS | 53 | 41-73 | 56.2% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 37 | 7 | 10 | | | SEATTLE | 84 | 159.5 | Over | 46 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 21-25 | 84.0% | 33 | 2 | 14 | 5/22/2016 | MINNESOTA | 78 | -9.5 | SU Under | 46 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 3-8 | 37.5% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 43 | 11 | 11 | | | SEATTLE | 71 | 158 | ATS | 41 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 42 | 6 | 15 | 9/11/2015 | MINNESOTA | 64 | -3.5 | Under | 33 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 4-19 | 21.1% | 14-22 | 63.6% | 46 | 8 | 10 | | | SEATTLE | 78 | 147 | SU ATS | 39 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 39 | 6 | 9 | 9/8/2015 | SEATTLE | 67 | 146 | ATS | 35 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 4-9 | 44.4% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 34 | 4 | 18 | | | MINNESOTA | 73 | -11.5 | SU Under | 46 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 41 | 13 | 12 | 7/3/2015 | SEATTLE | 57 | 148.5 | Under | 33 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 5-18 | 27.8% | 4-5 | 80.0% | 28 | 2 | 12 | | | MINNESOTA | 82 | -12.5 | SU ATS | 34 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 12-12 | 100.0% | 42 | 7 | 13 | 6/25/2015 | MINNESOTA | 76 | -10.5 | SU Over | 42 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 1-7 | 14.3% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 40 | 8 | 14 | | | SEATTLE | 73 | 145.5 | ATS | 51 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 9-24 | 37.5% | 8-11 | 72.7% | 36 | 6 | 17 | 6/11/2015 | SEATTLE | 70 | 148 | Over | 29 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 29 | 3 | 9 | | | MINNESOTA | 94 | -13 | SU ATS | 39 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 45 | 10 | 10 |
|
| | |
|
Boucek is 12-9 against the money line (+11.6 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Boucek is 9-16 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 76.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 15-27 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 73.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 3-17 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in road games after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 67.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 1-9 against the money line (-11.6 Units) off an upset win as an underdog as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Boucek is 2-9 against the money line (-8.7 Units) off a win against a division rival as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 67.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 1-6 against the money line (-7.5 Units) off an upset win as a home underdog as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.0, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 3-11 against the money line (-10.0 Units) off a home win as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Boucek is 9-18 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 8-19 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 3-15 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Boucek is 5-18 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.3, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Boucek is 5-16 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 72.3, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 166-77 against the money line (+15.5 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 61-11 against the money line (+23.0 Units) as a home favorite of -270 to -850 as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 91-24 against the money line (+23.5 Units) in home games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 91-24 against the money line (+23.5 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 63-31 against the money line (+17.1 Units) in August or September games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.3, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 106-45 against the money line (+35.4 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 71-21 against the money line (+26.8 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 53-13 against the money line (+29.9 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 40-9 against the money line (+24.2 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 54-11 against the money line (+34.5 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 39-8 against the money line (+20.5 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 51-21 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 24-6 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after having won 20 or more of their last 25 games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 62-18 against the money line (+19.0 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 82-34 against the money line (+18.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 119-53 against the money line (+16.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 43-10 against the money line (+19.3 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 54-18 against the money line (+19.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 42-8 against the money line (+22.4 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 94-39 against the money line (+19.6 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 88-36 against the money line (+16.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 135-52 against the money line (+21.9 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 96-32 against the money line (+25.6 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 85-26 against the money line (+26.2 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 35-7 against the money line (+18.1 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 33-8 against the money line (+19.7 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 28-6 against the money line (+18.7 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 33-19 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 48-27 against the money line (+15.3 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 23-4 against the money line (+13.5 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 37-15 against the money line (+14.3 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 59 times, while the road underdog won straight up 7 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 5 times, while the road underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/1/2024 8:01:27 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|