| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES
WASHINGTON |
|
|
157
| 75
Final
57 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 601 | LOS ANGELES | -165 | | 602 | WASHINGTON | +145 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(226-85 since 1997.) (72.7%, +93.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(226-85 since 1997.) (72.7%, +93.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(226-85 since 1997.) (72.7%, +93.3 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(226-85 since 1997.) (72.7%, +93.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(226-85 since 1997.) (72.7%, +93.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(226-85 since 1997.) (72.7%, +93.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(264-105 since 1997.) (71.5%, +90.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(264-105 since 1997.) (71.5%, +90.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(321-194 since 1997.) (62.3%, +76 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(311-211 since 1997.) (59.6%, +71.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(168-74 since 1997.) (69.4%, +60.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(187-82 since 1997.) (69.5%, +59.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(135-53 since 1997.) (71.8%, +54.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(127-111 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.4%, +43.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(134-56 since 1997.) (70.5%, +54.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(126-56 since 1997.) (69.2%, +51.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(98-43 since 1997.) (69.5%, +43.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, on Sunday games.
(97-52 since 1997.) (65.1%, +41.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(48-15 since 1997.) (76.2%, +34.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a upset loss as a favorite.
(74-62 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.4%, +37.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(40-12 since 1997.) (76.9%, +30.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite, in August or September games.
(26-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +22.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games, on Sunday games.
(51-17 since 1997.) (75%, +28.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in non-conference games, off 2 or more consecutive upset losses as a favorite.
(48-29 since 1997.) (62.3%, +28.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in non-conference games.
(65-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +39.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(43-16 since 1997.) (72.9%, +27.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher.
(66-26 since 1997.) (71.7%, +23 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a upset loss as a favorite, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(34-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (68%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(41-22 since 1997.) (65.1%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a upset loss as a favorite, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(22-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +17.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(62-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +28 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a upset loss as a favorite.
(47-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.1%, +31.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(31-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.9%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite.
(21-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.4%, +21.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite.
(30-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +27 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off a upset loss as a favorite.
(37-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.8%, +24.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a upset loss as a favorite.
(35-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +25.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite, with a winning record on the season.
(24-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +19.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite.
(24-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +21.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points against opponent off a upset loss as a favorite.
(39-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.2%, +25.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points against opponent off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite.
(25-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +21 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(266-94 since 1997.) (73.9%, +83.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(266-94 since 1997.) (73.9%, +83.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss against a division rival, in August or September games.
(264-97 since 1997.) (73.1%, +83.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(224-79 since 1997.) (73.9%, +79.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(224-79 since 1997.) (73.9%, +79.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(224-79 since 1997.) (73.9%, +79.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(224-79 since 1997.) (73.9%, +79.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(224-79 since 1997.) (73.9%, +79.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(224-79 since 1997.) (73.9%, +79.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more.
(205-75 since 1997.) (73.2%, +75.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(149-52 since 1997.) (74.1%, +56.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more.
(127-41 since 1997.) (75.6%, +54.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(104-28 since 1997.) (78.8%, +51.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(117-36 since 1997.) (76.5%, +51.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(114-36 since 1997.) (76%, +50.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(89-22 since 1997.) (80.2%, +44.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(76-18 since 1997.) (80.9%, +42.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(84-25 since 1997.) (77.1%, +41.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(98-40 since 1997.) (71%, +37.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(81-31 since 1997.) (72.3%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor offensive rebounding team - averaging <=9/game on the season.
(29-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (90.6%, +21.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(35-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +26.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(47-10 since 1997.) (82.5%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread against opponent after failing to cover the spread in 4 or more consecutive games.
(24-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games.
(29-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +22.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| LOS ANGELES | 80 | | 31-67 | 46.1% | 4-11 | 33.8% | 14-18 | 77.9% | 41 | 9 | 13 | | WASHINGTON | 76 | | 28-65 | 42.7% | 3-12 | 29.6% | 17-21 | 79.8% | 42 | 10 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 588 times, while WASHINGTON won 375 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) in road games when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.0, OPPONENT 77.6 | LOS ANGELES is 183-51 against the money line (+109.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.0, OPPONENT 77.7 | LOS ANGELES is 204-118 against the money line (+38.3 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 73.0 | WASHINGTON is 4-20 against the money line (-17.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.8, OPPONENT 81.8 | WASHINGTON is 61-91 against the money line (-41.6 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 72.8 | WASHINGTON is 28-83 against the money line (-61.6 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 77.2 | WASHINGTON is 23-33 against the money line (-19.5 Units) in home games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 79.9 | WASHINGTON is 3-16 against the money line (-12.8 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.0, OPPONENT 76.6 | WASHINGTON is 2-8 against the money line (-7.1 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.8, OPPONENT 82.1 | WASHINGTON is 18-73 against the money line (-54.6 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 79.7 | WASHINGTON is 7-41 against the money line (-26.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.8, OPPONENT 85.1 | WASHINGTON is 8-41 against the money line (-26.1 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.5, OPPONENT 80.0 | WASHINGTON is 55-94 against the money line (-38.2 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 74.1 | WASHINGTON is 1-11 against the money line (-10.8 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.4, OPPONENT 81.9 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 6-6 against the money line (-15.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.6, OPPONENT 80.2 | LOS ANGELES is 5-7 against the money line (-16.4 Units) in road games when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.8, OPPONENT 85.3 | LOS ANGELES is 8-10 against the money line (-15.2 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.0, OPPONENT 81.6 | LOS ANGELES is 4-5 against the money line (-13.7 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.8, OPPONENT 78.6 | LOS ANGELES is 58-62 against the money line (-38.1 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 74.7 | LOS ANGELES is 6-5 against the money line (-19.2 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.7, OPPONENT 78.5 | LOS ANGELES is 4-5 against the money line (-16.7 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.6, OPPONENT 86.2 | LOS ANGELES is 6-11 against the money line (-11.3 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 83.2 | WASHINGTON is 6-3 against the money line (+8.1 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.2, OPPONENT 74.4 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 15-7 against the money line (+7.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.5, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 6-37 against the money line (-23.6 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 49-100 against the money line (-38.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 5-26 against the money line (-19.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-37 against the money line (-22.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 23-49 against the money line (-25.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-32 against the money line (-23.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 10-30 against the money line (-19.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 44-78 against the money line (-35.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-30 against the money line (-19.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 5-24 against the money line (-17.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 8-22 against the money line (-14.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 5-31 against the money line (-24.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 10-32 against the money line (-21.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.5, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 6-32 against the money line (-23.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 10-26 against the money line (-14.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 19-60 against the money line (-37.6 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 2-22 against the money line (-18.5 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 5-29 against the money line (-20.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.8, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-23 against the money line (-14.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.9, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 4-24 against the money line (-17.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 4-20 against the money line (-14.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.5, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 26-61 against the money line (-33.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 66.7, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-25 against the money line (-19.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.8, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 4-4 against the money line (-17.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-5 against the money line (-18.3 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.8, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-16 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.9, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-12 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.2, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-3 against the money line (-21.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 7*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-5 against the money line (-18.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-3 against the money line (-21.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 7*) | LOS ANGELES is 40-30 against the money line (-25.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-5 against the money line (-17.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.4, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-3 against the money line (-21.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 7*) | LOS ANGELES is 24-16 against the money line (-20.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-9 against the money line (-21.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.3, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-18 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.9, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 88.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-11 against the money line (-12.3 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.1, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 85-48 against the money line (+24.8 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 20-65 against the money line (-34.8 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 96-243 against the money line (-74.8 Units) as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 125-140 against the money line (-57.2 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-28 against the money line (-21.4 Units) in August or September games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.6, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 124-196 against the money line (-83.7 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 76-131 against the money line (-61.5 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.7, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 1-10 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after 3 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.2, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-24 against the money line (-17.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 64-107 against the money line (-48.2 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 30-50 against the money line (-25.6 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-31 against the money line (-21.1 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 47-83 against the money line (-38.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 12-24 against the money line (-19.4 Units) after a game where they were called for 27 or more fouls since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.7, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 6-22 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after a game where they were called for 10+ more fouls than opponent since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 4-13 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 3-14 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 37-94 against the money line (-57.7 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.0, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 2-15 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-25 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 73-120 against the money line (-41.7 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.1, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 23-65 against the money line (-39.1 Units) after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 67.4, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 7-31 against the money line (-21.1 Units) after having lost 4 of their last 5 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 51-106 against the money line (-39.3 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.7, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-32 against the money line (-19.4 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 68-126 against the money line (-57.0 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.2, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 25-55 against the money line (-31.3 Units) off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.1, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 1-9 against the money line (-9.4 Units) in home games off a road loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 3-11 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in a loss to a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 65-111 against the money line (-41.6 Units) off a road loss since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 22-42 against the money line (-28.4 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 11-39 against the money line (-23.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 3-18 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 3-8 against the money line (-7.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-30 against the money line (-20.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 3-23 against the money line (-20.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 7-28 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 2-12 against the money line (-10.6 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 67.3, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 3-10 against the money line (-8.5 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-21 against the money line (-18.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 8-25 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 16-51 against the money line (-26.3 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 98-155 against the money line (-56.4 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 100-177 against the money line (-70.3 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 50-96 against the money line (-53.0 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.8, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 15-48 against the money line (-25.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 10-36 against the money line (-20.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 10-7 against the money line (-22.2 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.3, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-7 against the money line (-16.4 Units) as a road favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-5 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in road games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.1, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-5 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.1, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-5 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.1, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-5 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in road games in August or September games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.4, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-10 against the money line (-12.4 Units) on Sunday games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-6 against the money line (-19.2 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-5 against the money line (-20.2 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.5, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-8 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-8 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in road games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-5 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in road games after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.7, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-4 against the money line (-9.6 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite of 6 or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-4 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in road games off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-10 against the money line (-10.5 Units) in road games off a loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-5 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in road games off a upset loss as a favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-6 against the money line (-22.2 Units) after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 22-15 against the money line (-29.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-5 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-9 against the money line (-25.0 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.4, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-4 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-8 against the money line (-26.2 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-20 against the money line (-23.5 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-6 against the money line (-22.2 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 7*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-4 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.4, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-7 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.2, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) in home games against Western conference opponents this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.8, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 4-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) in home games in non-conference games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.8, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 12-7 | -22.2 | 7-12 | 7-12 | 83.3 | 42.2 | 47.3% | 41.2 | 76.2 | 38.1 | 41.7% | 42.6 | | Road Games | 3-5 | -10.2 | 2-6 | 4-4 | 80.1 | 39.7 | 45.7% | 40.4 | 84.5 | 42.1 | 44.9% | 43.6 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -20.6 | 0-5 | 2-3 | 76.2 | 32.8 | 41.1% | 39.6 | 79.2 | 40.4 | 43.1% | 45.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 83.3 | 42.2 | 32-67 | 47.3% | 4-11 | 34.4% | 16-21 | 78.0% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.9 | 38.7 | 29-67 | 43.0% | 5-15 | 32.6% | 15-19 | 78.2% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.1 | 39.7 | 32-69 | 45.7% | 3-12 | 28.7% | 13-19 | 72.5% | 40 | 8 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.2 | 38.1 | 28-68 | 41.7% | 4-14 | 28.3% | 15-20 | 78.2% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 76.9 | 38 | 28-67 | 42.4% | 5-16 | 31.4% | 15-19 | 78.6% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 84.5 | 42.1 | 30-68 | 44.9% | 5-14 | 32.7% | 19-23 | 83.4% | 44 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 9-11 | +3.2 | 11-9 | 11-8 | 77.1 | 36.7 | 42.9% | 43.2 | 77.8 | 38.4 | 41.0% | 43.1 | | Home Games | 6-4 | +4.6 | 5-5 | 4-6 | 75.3 | 35.4 | 41.2% | 44.0 | 72.9 | 34.9 | 38.8% | 44.9 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -5 | 1-4 | 3-1 | 72.0 | 31.8 | 40.6% | 41.0 | 78.6 | 37.0 | 39.3% | 44.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 77.1 | 36.7 | 28-65 | 42.9% | 4-12 | 32.2% | 17-22 | 79.7% | 43 | 9 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75.7 | 37.5 | 28-66 | 42.5% | 5-14 | 32.5% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 75.3 | 35.4 | 27-65 | 41.2% | 4-12 | 31.7% | 17-22 | 80.3% | 44 | 9 | 15 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.8 | 38.4 | 28-69 | 41.0% | 5-17 | 31.5% | 16-20 | 79.9% | 43 | 11 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.9 | 38.1 | 28-67 | 41.7% | 5-16 | 32.0% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 72.9 | 34.9 | 26-68 | 38.8% | 5-18 | 29.4% | 15-19 | 76.7% | 45 | 12 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 68.5, WASHINGTON 71.4 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/28/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 64-88 | L | +210 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 31 | 14 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 52 | 14 | | 6/29/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 82-94 | L | +155 | 32-72 | 44.4% | 44 | 13 | 31-80 | 38.7% | 55 | 7 | | 7/2/2013 | MINNESOTA | 96-66 | W | -155 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 48 | 8 | 25-71 | 35.2% | 43 | 13 | | 7/4/2013 | NEW YORK | 97-89 | W | -1050 | 40-62 | 64.5% | 29 | 15 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 34 | 14 | | 7/6/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 93-66 | W | -850 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 43 | 12 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 38 | 15 | | 7/11/2013 | @ TULSA | 94-78 | W | -360 | 39-71 | 54.9% | 35 | 10 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 40 | 20 | | 7/14/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 88-76 | W | -175 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 53 | 13 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 35 | 14 | | 7/17/2013 | ATLANTA | 77-73 | W | -550 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 43 | 17 | 31-87 | 35.6% | 55 | 12 | | 7/18/2013 | PHOENIX | 84-90 | L | -850 | 30-79 | 38.0% | 49 | 14 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 48 | 15 | | 7/20/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 65-64 | W | -330 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 36 | 17 | 23-56 | 41.1% | 33 | 17 | | 7/25/2013 | SEATTLE | 66-73 | L | -1050 | 19-61 | 31.1% | 33 | 10 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 49 | 17 | | 8/2/2013 | @ TULSA | 89-96 | L | -360 | 36-78 | 46.2% | 37 | 11 | 33-62 | 53.2% | 42 | 14 | | 8/4/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/10/2013 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/13/2013 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2013 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/20/2013 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/27/2013 | PHOENIX | 97-101 | L | +145 | 36-77 | 46.8% | 41 | 9 | 36-67 | 53.7% | 42 | 14 | | 6/28/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 75-86 | L | +350 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 36 | 15 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 46 | 16 | | 6/30/2013 | TULSA | 84-61 | W | -165 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 62 | 18 | 17-70 | 24.3% | 40 | 15 | | 7/6/2013 | SEATTLE | 62-59 | W | -250 | 18-55 | 32.7% | 39 | 17 | 20-54 | 37.0% | 41 | 23 | | 7/10/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 85-89 | L | +350 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 41 | 11 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 48 | 9 | | 7/12/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 83-73 | W | +145 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 51 | 16 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 33 | 7 | | 7/16/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 86-64 | W | -300 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 48 | 10 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 42 | 16 | | 7/19/2013 | @ INDIANA | 70-77 | L | +175 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 38 | 21 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 41 | 13 | | 7/21/2013 | INDIANA | 52-65 | L | -200 | 17-55 | 30.9% | 40 | 15 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 44 | 12 | | 7/24/2013 | CHICAGO | 82-78 | W | +155 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 46 | 12 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 45 | 9 | | 7/31/2013 | NEW YORK | 78-88 | L | -250 | 28-77 | 36.4% | 40 | 11 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 53 | 16 | | 8/2/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 78-85 | L | +210 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 41 | 19 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 41 | 10 | | 8/4/2013 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2013 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2013 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2013 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2013 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/20/2013 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| WASHINGTON is 9-21 (-4.7 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 4-1 (+0.0 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 10-5 (+4.3 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 2-0 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/23/2013 | WASHINGTON | 69 | 160 | ATS | 37 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 5-8 | 62.5% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 48 | 9 | 19 | | | LOS ANGELES | 79 | -13 | SU Under | 47 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 2-5 | 40.0% | 19-21 | 90.5% | 37 | 7 | 11 | 9/7/2012 | LOS ANGELES | 96 | -9 | SU ATS | 54 | 39-63 | 61.9% | 7-9 | 77.8% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 40 | 7 | 18 | | | WASHINGTON | 68 | 154 | Over | 39 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 33 | 12 | 14 | 6/18/2012 | WASHINGTON | 70 | 148 | Over | 36 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 5-21 | 23.8% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 36 | 10 | 25 | | | LOS ANGELES | 101 | -9 | SU ATS | 44 | 37-69 | 53.6% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 23-29 | 79.3% | 37 | 14 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Carol is 15-7 against the money line (+7.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.5, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Carol is 8-7 against the money line (-16.4 Units) as a road favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 12-15 against the money line (-17.7 Units) in road games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.7, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 12-15 against the money line (-17.7 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.7, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 10-15 against the money line (-20.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.0, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Carol is 3-5 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in road games in August or September games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.4, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 16-12 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.8, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 5-8 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 1-5 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in road games after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.7, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 1-4 against the money line (-9.6 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite of 6 or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 1-4 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in road games off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 1-5 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in road games off a upset loss as a favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Carol is 24-14 against the money line (-23.7 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 15-11 against the money line (-23.5 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.0, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 10-9 against the money line (-25.0 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.4, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Carol is 7-7 against the money line (-21.2 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.6, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Carol is 11-13 against the money line (-27.3 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.0, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 5*) | Carol is 2-6 against the money line (-9.2 Units) in road games after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.6, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 3-7 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.2, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 14-11 against the money line (-25.6 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.2, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Carol is 6-5 against the money line (-18.3 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.8, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 8-12 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.2, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 6-5 against the money line (-17.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.4, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 13-9 against the money line (-22.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 24-16 against the money line (-20.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 7-11 against the money line (-12.3 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.1, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 52-26 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 77.7, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 34-12 against the money line (+15.0 Units) in home games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 78.1, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 97-64 against the money line (+27.7 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 76.6, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 68-43 against the money line (+21.3 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 78.9, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 40-26 against the money line (+20.9 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 77.0, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 69-45 against the money line (+20.2 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 76.3, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 65-35 against the money line (+20.9 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 78.0, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 29-13 against the money line (+19.3 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 77.6, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 17-8 against the money line (+9.6 Units) off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 76.0, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 82-58 against the money line (+24.3 Units) after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 77.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 71-52 against the money line (+17.4 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 77.2, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 56-26 against the money line (+30.6 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 77.7, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Mike is 88-63 against the money line (+20.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 76.9, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 69-30 against the money line (+20.6 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 75.4, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 22-16 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 76.3, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 39-21 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 73.4, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 4 times, while the home underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog won the game straight up 1 times, while the road favorite won the game straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [F] 08/03/2013 - Candace Parker "?" Sunday vs. Wash Mystics ( Wrist ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/28/2024 4:20:21 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|