| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES
First Half Results
WASHINGTON |
|
|
77.5
| 33
Final
26 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 601 | LOS ANGELES | -2 | | 602 | WASHINGTON | 78.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(80-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games.
(29-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.6%, +21.3 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(107-57 since 1997.) (65.2%, +44.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(134-76 since 1997.) (63.8%, +50.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(60-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a division game.
(857-638 since 1997.) (57.3%, +155.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a division game against opponent after 2 consecutive division games.
(356-255 since 1997.) (58.3%, +75.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a division game against opponent after 3 consecutive division games.
(250-174 since 1997.) (59%, +58.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 2 consecutive division games.
(586-431 since 1997.) (57.6%, +111.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(69-35 since 1997.) (66.3%, +30.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(57-25 since 1997.) (69.5%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(512-378 since 1997.) (57.5%, +96.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(109-61 since 1997.) (64.1%, +41.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(92-47 since 1997.) (66.2%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(92-47 since 1997.) (66.2%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(92-47 since 1997.) (66.2%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(396-248 since 1997.) (61.5%, +123.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(288-172 since 1997.) (62.6%, +98.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(357-243 since 1997.) (59.5%, +89.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after one or more consecutive overs.
(648-486 since 1997.) (57.1%, +113.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(104-58 since 1997.) (64.2%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(73-39 since 1997.) (65.2%, +30.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(57-26 since 1997.) (68.7%, +28.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games.
(39-16 since 1997.) (70.9%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - with a losing record.
(468-340 since 1997.) (57.9%, +94 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(193-125 since 1997.) (60.7%, +55.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(104-58 since 1997.) (64.2%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(701-479 since 1997.) (59.4%, +174.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss versus opponent, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(173-109 since 1997.) (61.3%, +53.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(305-202 since 1997.) (60.2%, +82.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(112-62 since 1997.) (64.4%, +43.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(75-37 since 1997.) (67%, +34.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points.
(511-364 since 1997.) (58.4%, +110.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record.
(234-156 since 1997.) (60%, +62.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(371-253 since 1997.) (59.5%, +92.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(60-25 since 1997.) (70.6%, +32.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(494-330 since 1997.) (60%, +131 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(144-88 since 1997.) (62.1%, +47.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(245-158 since 1997.) (60.8%, +71.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(88-48 since 1997.) (64.7%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - revenging a road loss versus opponent.
(552-368 since 1997.) (60%, +147.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(245-160 since 1997.) (60.5%, +69 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(215-140 since 1997.) (60.6%, +61 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(309-207 since 1997.) (59.9%, +81.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(86-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.6%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(533-381 since 1997.) (58.3%, +113.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(109-61 since 1997.) (64.1%, +41.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(92-47 since 1997.) (66.2%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(92-47 since 1997.) (66.2%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(92-47 since 1997.) (66.2%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(102-56 since 1997.) (64.6%, +40.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(84-44 since 1997.) (65.6%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(84-44 since 1997.) (65.6%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(84-44 since 1997.) (65.6%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(396-248 since 1997.) (61.5%, +123.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(288-172 since 1997.) (62.6%, +98.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential).
(61-28 since 1997.) (68.5%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - with a winning record on the season.
(640-436 since 1997.) (59.5%, +160.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(429-294 since 1997.) (59.3%, +105.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(259-168 since 1997.) (60.7%, +74.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(139-82 since 1997.) (62.9%, +48.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season.
(338-235 since 1997.) (59%, +79.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game.
(711-514 since 1997.) (58%, +145.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(408-286 since 1997.) (58.8%, +93.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game.
(186-111 since 1997.) (62.6%, +63.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| LOS ANGELES | 80 | | 41 | | 31-67 | 46.1% | 4-11 | 33.8% | 14-18 | 77.9% | 41 | 9 | 13 | | WASHINGTON | 76 | | 38 | | 28-65 | 42.7% | 3-12 | 29.6% | 17-21 | 79.8% | 42 | 10 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES covered the first half line 491 times, while WASHINGTON covered the first half line 467 times.
No Edge. | In 1000 simulated games, 512 games went over first half total, while 488 games went under first half total.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 24-14 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.2, OPPONENT 39.1 | LOS ANGELES is 30-10 against the 1rst half line (+19.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 45.2, OPPONENT 38.3 | WASHINGTON is 1-9 against the 1rst half line (-8.9 Units) in home games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 40.7 | WASHINGTON is 32-59 against the 1rst half line (-32.9 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.7, OPPONENT 38.5 | WASHINGTON is 15-34 against the 1rst half line (-22.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.6, OPPONENT 42.2 | WASHINGTON is 23-40 against the 1rst half line (-21.0 Units) in home games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 38.2 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) in road games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.6, OPPONENT 42.4 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 37-19 OVER (+16.1 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.7, OPPONENT 40.4 | LOS ANGELES is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.4, OPPONENT 41.9 | LOS ANGELES is 26-14 OVER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 45.2, OPPONENT 38.3 | WASHINGTON is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.4, OPPONENT 43.6 | WASHINGTON is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.5, OPPONENT 42.6 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 19-10 UNDER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.1, OPPONENT 37.6 | LOS ANGELES is 69-39 UNDER (+26.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.1, OPPONENT 34.6 | LOS ANGELES is 180-138 UNDER (+28.2 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 34.7 | WASHINGTON is 87-62 UNDER (+18.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 35.4 | WASHINGTON is 81-56 UNDER (+19.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 36.4 | WASHINGTON is 154-116 UNDER (+26.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.7 | WASHINGTON is 169-112 UNDER (+45.8 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.0 | WASHINGTON is 111-78 UNDER (+25.2 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 34.9 | WASHINGTON is 151-116 UNDER (+23.4 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 35.4 |
|
| | | | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.6, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 27-16 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.6, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 28-16 against the 1rst half line (+10.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.6, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.9, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.5, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.4, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 106-138 against the 1rst half line (-45.8 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.8, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 27-44 against the 1rst half line (-21.4 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.6, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 10-22 against the 1rst half line (-14.2 Units) in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 15-32 against the 1rst half line (-20.2 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.6, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 17-32 against the 1rst half line (-18.2 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 33.2, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.4, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 71-46 UNDER (+20.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 39-23 UNDER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.6, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 95-64 UNDER (+24.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 173-135 UNDER (+24.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.5, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 126-86 UNDER (+31.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.5, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 84-60 UNDER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.5, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 104-64 UNDER (+33.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 141-104 UNDER (+26.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.6, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 52-33 UNDER (+15.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.9, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 138-106 UNDER (+21.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.8, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 67-38 UNDER (+25.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 45-25 UNDER (+17.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.6, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 60-35 UNDER (+21.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.9, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 160-117 UNDER (+31.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 46-26 UNDER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.1, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 69-42 UNDER (+22.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 40-23 UNDER (+14.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 67-38 UNDER (+25.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 132-96 UNDER (+26.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.7, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 114-70 UNDER (+37.0 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 116-85 UNDER (+22.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 166-123 UNDER (+30.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.7, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 159-110 UNDER (+38.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.6, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 236-163 UNDER (+56.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 116-86 UNDER (+21.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.0, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 75-51 UNDER (+18.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 74-50 UNDER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.7, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 38-20 UNDER (+16.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 34-23 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.8, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 30-14 against the 1rst half line (+14.6 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.3, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-3 against the 1rst half line (+9.7 Units) in August or September games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 45.3, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-5 against the 1rst half line (+12.5 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 44.6, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.7, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 44.2, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 28-17 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.1, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 24-10 against the 1rst half line (+13.0 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.5, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.3, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-16 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.0, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 15-30 against the 1rst half line (-18.0 Units) in home games after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.7, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 23-39 against the 1rst half line (-19.9 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 5-18 against the 1rst half line (-14.8 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 30.8, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 29-50 against the 1rst half line (-26.0 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.3, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 22-40 against the 1rst half line (-22.0 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 31-49 against the 1rst half line (-22.9 Units) in home games after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.7, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 21-9 against the 1rst half line (+11.1 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.9, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-8 against the 1rst half line (+8.2 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 18-6 against the 1rst half line (+11.4 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.7, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 20-9 against the 1rst half line (+10.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.5, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-7 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.0, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.2, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.2, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 47.3, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.8, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total against Western conference opponents this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 42.4, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.2, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 42.4, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 320-265 UNDER (+28.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.5, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 168-124 UNDER (+31.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.9, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 139-99 UNDER (+30.1 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.5, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 207-163 UNDER (+27.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.4, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.3, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 131-100 UNDER (+21.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.3, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 164-117 UNDER (+35.3 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.1, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 30-16 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games off a upset loss as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.6, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 147-111 UNDER (+24.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 100-64 UNDER (+29.6 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 98-69 UNDER (+22.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.5, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 77-53 UNDER (+18.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.2, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 117-88 UNDER (+20.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 213-167 UNDER (+29.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.5, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.0, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 65-37 UNDER (+24.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 33.5, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 UNDER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.4, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 77-44 UNDER (+28.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.5, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 157-114 UNDER (+31.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 164-124 UNDER (+27.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 83-59 UNDER (+18.1 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 39-23 UNDER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.5, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 300-219 UNDER (+59.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 193-141 UNDER (+37.9 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.6, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 65-43 UNDER (+17.7 Units) the 1rst half total as a home underdog vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.7, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 57-37 UNDER (+16.3 Units) the 1rst half total as a home underdog of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.7, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 155-102 UNDER (+42.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 90-65 UNDER (+18.5 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.2, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 95-66 UNDER (+22.4 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.8, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 14-4 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total on Sunday games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 30.6, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 182-131 UNDER (+37.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 119-83 UNDER (+27.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 75-47 UNDER (+23.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 85-59 UNDER (+20.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 153-110 UNDER (+32.0 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 44-26 UNDER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 120-74 UNDER (+38.6 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 93-57 UNDER (+30.3 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.7, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 115-75 UNDER (+32.5 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 51-31 UNDER (+16.9 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 31.9, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 179-130 UNDER (+36.0 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 130-81 UNDER (+40.9 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 76-53 UNDER (+17.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games revenging a road loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.1, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 109-80 UNDER (+21.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 49-28 UNDER (+18.2 Units) the 1rst half total off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.8, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 40-23 UNDER (+14.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games off a road loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 56-34 UNDER (+18.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games off a road loss since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 127-89 UNDER (+29.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 85-57 UNDER (+22.3 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 140-100 UNDER (+30.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 74-50 UNDER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 21-8 UNDER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.1, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 38-19 UNDER (+17.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 108-74 UNDER (+26.6 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 25-12 UNDER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 45-26 UNDER (+16.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.4, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 186-135 UNDER (+37.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.2, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 128-94 UNDER (+24.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 140-106 UNDER (+23.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 155-116 UNDER (+27.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.1, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 88-55 UNDER (+27.5 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.5, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 174-132 UNDER (+28.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 111-73 UNDER (+30.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 12-7 | -22.2 | 7-12 | 7-12 | 83.3 | 42.2 | 47.3% | 41.2 | 76.2 | 38.1 | 41.7% | 42.6 | | Road Games | 3-5 | -10.2 | 2-6 | 4-4 | 80.1 | 39.7 | 45.7% | 40.4 | 84.5 | 42.1 | 44.9% | 43.6 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -20.6 | 0-5 | 2-3 | 76.2 | 32.8 | 41.1% | 39.6 | 79.2 | 40.4 | 43.1% | 45.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 83.3 | 42.2 | 32-67 | 47.3% | 4-11 | 34.4% | 16-21 | 78.0% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.9 | 38.7 | 29-67 | 43.0% | 5-15 | 32.6% | 15-19 | 78.2% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.1 | 39.7 | 32-69 | 45.7% | 3-12 | 28.7% | 13-19 | 72.5% | 40 | 8 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.2 | 38.1 | 28-68 | 41.7% | 4-14 | 28.3% | 15-20 | 78.2% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 76.9 | 38 | 28-67 | 42.4% | 5-16 | 31.4% | 15-19 | 78.6% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 84.5 | 42.1 | 30-68 | 44.9% | 5-14 | 32.7% | 19-23 | 83.4% | 44 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 9-11 | +3.2 | 11-9 | 11-8 | 77.1 | 36.7 | 42.9% | 43.2 | 77.8 | 38.4 | 41.0% | 43.1 | | Home Games | 6-4 | +4.6 | 5-5 | 4-6 | 75.3 | 35.4 | 41.2% | 44.0 | 72.9 | 34.9 | 38.8% | 44.9 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -5 | 1-4 | 3-1 | 72.0 | 31.8 | 40.6% | 41.0 | 78.6 | 37.0 | 39.3% | 44.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 77.1 | 36.7 | 28-65 | 42.9% | 4-12 | 32.2% | 17-22 | 79.7% | 43 | 9 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 75.7 | 37.5 | 28-66 | 42.5% | 5-14 | 32.5% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 75.3 | 35.4 | 27-65 | 41.2% | 4-12 | 31.7% | 17-22 | 80.3% | 44 | 9 | 15 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.8 | 38.4 | 28-69 | 41.0% | 5-17 | 31.5% | 16-20 | 79.9% | 43 | 11 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.9 | 38.1 | 28-67 | 41.7% | 5-16 | 32.0% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 72.9 | 34.9 | 26-68 | 38.8% | 5-18 | 29.4% | 15-19 | 76.7% | 45 | 12 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 68.5, WASHINGTON 71.4 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/28/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 64-88 | 30-44 | 3.5 | L | 81 | U | 24-65 | 36.9% | 31 | 14 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 52 | 14 | | 6/29/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 82-94 | 41-47 | 2 | L | 79.5 | O | 32-72 | 44.4% | 44 | 13 | 31-80 | 38.7% | 55 | 7 | | 7/2/2013 | MINNESOTA | 96-66 | 60-39 | -1.5 | W | 81.5 | O | 33-70 | 47.1% | 48 | 8 | 25-71 | 35.2% | 43 | 13 | | 7/4/2013 | NEW YORK | 97-89 | 60-37 | -7.5 | W | 77.5 | O | 40-62 | 64.5% | 29 | 15 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 34 | 14 | | 7/6/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 93-66 | 39-29 | -7 | W | 79 | U | 36-66 | 54.5% | 43 | 12 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 38 | 15 | | 7/11/2013 | @ TULSA | 94-78 | 50-35 | -4.5 | W | 80.5 | O | 39-71 | 54.9% | 35 | 10 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 40 | 20 | | 7/14/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 88-76 | 43-37 | -2 | W | 87 | U | 34-67 | 50.7% | 53 | 13 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 35 | 14 | | 7/17/2013 | ATLANTA | 77-73 | 37-34 | -6 | L | 80.5 | U | 26-59 | 44.1% | 43 | 17 | 31-87 | 35.6% | 55 | 12 | | 7/18/2013 | PHOENIX | 84-90 | 38-46 | -7 | L | 85.5 | U | 30-79 | 38.0% | 49 | 14 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 48 | 15 | | 7/20/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 65-64 | 31-39 | -4 | L | 74.5 | U | 27-59 | 45.8% | 36 | 17 | 23-56 | 41.1% | 33 | 17 | | 7/25/2013 | SEATTLE | 66-73 | 27-41 | -7.5 | L | 73.5 | U | 19-61 | 31.1% | 33 | 10 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 49 | 17 | | 8/2/2013 | @ TULSA | 89-96 | 31-42 | -4.5 | L | 80 | U | 36-78 | 46.2% | 37 | 11 | 33-62 | 53.2% | 42 | 14 | | 8/4/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/10/2013 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/13/2013 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2013 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/20/2013 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/27/2013 | PHOENIX | 97-101 | 50-43 | 2 | W | 82 | O | 36-77 | 46.8% | 41 | 9 | 36-67 | 53.7% | 42 | 14 | | 6/28/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 75-86 | 28-39 | 5.5 | L | 77 | U | 31-69 | 44.9% | 36 | 15 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 46 | 16 | | 6/30/2013 | TULSA | 84-61 | 44-34 | -2 | W | 79 | U | 29-67 | 43.3% | 62 | 18 | 17-70 | 24.3% | 40 | 15 | | 7/6/2013 | SEATTLE | 62-59 | 35-21 | -3 | W | 71.5 | U | 18-55 | 32.7% | 39 | 17 | 20-54 | 37.0% | 41 | 23 | | 7/10/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 85-89 | 38-50 | 5.5 | L | 78.5 | O | 31-67 | 46.3% | 41 | 11 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 48 | 9 | | 7/12/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 83-73 | 49-36 | 2 | W | 76 | O | 26-58 | 44.8% | 51 | 16 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 33 | 7 | | 7/16/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 86-64 | 41-36 | -3.5 | W | 75 | O | 36-74 | 48.6% | 48 | 10 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 42 | 16 | | 7/19/2013 | @ INDIANA | 70-77 | 31-32 | 2.5 | W | 72.5 | U | 25-54 | 46.3% | 38 | 21 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 41 | 13 | | 7/21/2013 | INDIANA | 52-65 | 16-30 | -2.5 | L | 71.5 | U | 17-55 | 30.9% | 40 | 15 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 44 | 12 | | 7/24/2013 | CHICAGO | 82-78 | 35-44 | 2 | L | 77 | O | 27-63 | 42.9% | 46 | 12 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 45 | 9 | | 7/31/2013 | NEW YORK | 78-88 | 33-35 | -3 | L | 72 | U | 28-77 | 36.4% | 40 | 11 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 53 | 16 | | 8/2/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 78-85 | 44-44 | 3.5 | W | 76 | O | 31-66 | 47.0% | 41 | 19 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 41 | 10 | | 8/4/2013 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2013 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2013 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2013 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2013 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/20/2013 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| LOS ANGELES is 19-9 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON since 1997 | | 16 of 30 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 5-0 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons | | 4 of 5 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 8-6 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON since 1997 | | 8 of 15 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 2-0 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/23/2013 | WASHINGTON | 69 | 160 | ATS | 37 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 5-8 | 62.5% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 48 | 9 | 19 | | | LOS ANGELES | 79 | -13 | SU Under | 47 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 2-5 | 40.0% | 19-21 | 90.5% | 37 | 7 | 11 | 9/7/2012 | LOS ANGELES | 96 | -9 | SU ATS | 54 | 39-63 | 61.9% | 7-9 | 77.8% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 40 | 7 | 18 | | | WASHINGTON | 68 | 154 | Over | 39 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 33 | 12 | 14 | 6/18/2012 | WASHINGTON | 70 | 148 | Over | 36 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 5-21 | 23.8% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 36 | 10 | 25 | | | LOS ANGELES | 101 | -9 | SU ATS | 44 | 37-69 | 53.6% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 23-29 | 79.3% | 37 | 14 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Carol is 34-23 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.8, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 30-14 against the 1rst half line (+14.6 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.3, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 13-3 against the 1rst half line (+9.7 Units) in August or September games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 45.3, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 18-5 against the 1rst half line (+12.5 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 44.6, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Carol is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.7, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 44.2, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 28-17 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.1, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 24-10 against the 1rst half line (+13.0 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.5, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.3, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 26-16 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.0, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.6, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 27-16 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.6, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 28-16 against the 1rst half line (+10.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.6, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.9, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.5, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.4, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 68-94 against the 1rst half line (-35.4 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 36.4, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 38-62 against the 1rst half line (-30.2 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.7, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 43-64 against the 1rst half line (-27.4 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.3, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 28-47 against the 1rst half line (-23.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.4, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 60-84 against the 1rst half line (-32.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.5, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 79-107 against the 1rst half line (-38.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 38.4, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Carol is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 47.3, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 88-60 OVER (+22.0 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.3, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 31-16 OVER (+13.4 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 39.3, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 11-2 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 41.5, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Mike is 78-52 UNDER (+20.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Carol 36.3, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 30-15 UNDER (+13.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Carol 35.7, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 26-11 UNDER (+13.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Carol 35.2, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 21-7 UNDER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Carol 34.6, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 53-31 UNDER (+18.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Carol 35.3, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 80-42 UNDER (+33.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Carol 35.3, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 27-11 UNDER (+14.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Carol 36.9, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 29-15 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Carol 36.6, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 48-27 UNDER (+18.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Carol 35.2, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 66-39 UNDER (+23.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Carol 35.3, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 64-39 UNDER (+21.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Carol 35.5, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 89-58 UNDER (+25.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Carol 36.1, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 31-15 UNDER (+14.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Carol 34.6, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home underdog covered the first half line 5 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 2 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog covered the first half line 1 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 0 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 12 games went over the first half total, while 5 games went under the first half total. | Over the last 3 seasons, 8 games went over the first half total, while 1 games went under the first half total.
Edge against the first half total=Over |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the home underdog covered the first half line 3 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 1 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog covered the first half line 2 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 1 times. | | Since 1997, 3 games went under the first half total, while 0 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 2 games went under the first half total, while 0 games went over the first half total. |
|
| | |
| [F] 08/03/2013 - Candace Parker "?" Sunday vs. Wash Mystics ( Wrist ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/1/2024 5:41:47 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|