| | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
TULSA First Half Results SAN ANTONIO |
|
| 74.5 | 35 Final 33 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
603 | TULSA | 74.5 | 604 | SAN ANTONIO | -1 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
- Home teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days, with a losing record. (65-32 since 1997.) (67%, +29.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games. (29-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.6%, +21.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread. (24-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.8%, +18.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games against opponent after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games. (59-28 since 1997.) (67.8%, +28.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games against opponent after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games. (37-18 since 1997.) (67.3%, +17.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (TULSA) - good free throw shooting team (76-80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better. (24-4 since 1997.) (85.7%, +19.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (TULSA) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 80 points or more. (30-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.9%, +20.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (TULSA) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more. (24-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.8%, +18.5 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, in a game involving two bad teams (25% to 40%). (33-10 since 1997.) (76.7%, +22 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - being called for 18 or less fouls/game on the season, on Sunday games. (35-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +18.5 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - vs. division opponents. (836-625 since 1997.) (57.2%, +148.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after a division game. (857-638 since 1997.) (57.3%, +155.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (36-10 since 1997.) (78.3%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (36-10 since 1997.) (78.3%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (36-10 since 1997.) (78.3%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record. (154-93 since 1997.) (62.3%, +51.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (104-61 since 1997.) (63%, +36.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread. (127-74 since 1997.) (63.2%, +45.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - with a losing record. (468-340 since 1997.) (57.9%, +94 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - off a loss against a division rival against opponent off a win against a division rival. (171-109 since 1997.) (61.1%, +51.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 80 points or more. (135-82 since 1997.) (62.2%, +44.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better. (69-29 since 1997.) (70.4%, +37.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after 1 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 1 or more consecutive wins. (358-254 since 1997.) (58.5%, +78.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games against opponent after having won 3 of their last 4 games. (38-16 since 1997.) (70.4%, +20.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher. (38-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.5%, +23.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - vs. division opponents. (836-625 since 1997.) (57.2%, +148.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - vs. division opponents, off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog. (84-43 since 1997.) (66.1%, +36.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (533-381 since 1997.) (58.3%, +113.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (36-10 since 1997.) (78.3%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (36-10 since 1997.) (78.3%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (36-10 since 1997.) (78.3%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread. (353-237 since 1997.) (59.8%, +92.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days. (92-48 since 1997.) (65.7%, +39.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games. (416-292 since 1997.) (58.8%, +94.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - off a win against a division rival. (424-297 since 1997.) (58.8%, +97.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game. (711-514 since 1997.) (58%, +145.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after a game where they covered the spread. (674-462 since 1997.) (59.3%, +165.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after a game where they covered the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days. (162-100 since 1997.) (61.8%, +52 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins. (710-481 since 1997.) (59.6%, +180.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better. (268-175 since 1997.) (60.5%, +75.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
TULSA | 78 | | 39 | | 28-67 | 42.2% | 7-20 | 33.6% | 14-18 | 79.0% | 45 | 11 | 15 | SAN ANTONIO | 76 | | 39 | | 30-70 | 42.0% | 6-17 | 33.4% | 11-16 | 72.3% | 44 | 12 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, TULSA covered the first half line 516 times, while SAN ANTONIO covered the first half line 453 times. No Edge. | In 1000 simulated games, 611 games went over first half total, while 389 games went under first half total. Edge against first half total=Over |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
TULSA is 18-9 against the 1rst half line (+8.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 42.3, OPPONENT 41.3 | SAN ANTONIO is 35-56 against the 1rst half line (-26.6 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.6, OPPONENT 37.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 37-64 against the 1rst half line (-33.4 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.3, OPPONENT 36.8 | SAN ANTONIO is 54-99 against the 1rst half line (-54.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 41.6 | SAN ANTONIO is 81-111 against the 1rst half line (-41.1 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.7, OPPONENT 36.1 |
|
TULSA is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 39.1, OPPONENT 43.7 | TULSA is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 39.0, OPPONENT 43.8 | TULSA is 23-11 OVER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 40.3, OPPONENT 44.1 | TULSA is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 42.3, OPPONENT 41.3 | SAN ANTONIO is 15-5 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 40.7, OPPONENT 43.6 | SAN ANTONIO is 17-7 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 40.5, OPPONENT 41.3 |
|
SAN ANTONIO is 45-25 UNDER (+17.5 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.1, OPPONENT 36.1 | SAN ANTONIO is 82-56 UNDER (+20.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 36.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 26-13 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.8, OPPONENT 32.6 | SAN ANTONIO is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.8, OPPONENT 36.3 |
|
| | | | |
|
SAN ANTONIO is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 13-27 against the 1rst half line (-16.7 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.6, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 20-37 against the 1rst half line (-20.7 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.6, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
TULSA is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 36.8, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
TULSA is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 41.7, OPPONENT 45.3 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 42.6, OPPONENT 46.3 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 41.9, OPPONENT 46.2 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 39.2, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 40.0, OPPONENT 45.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 44.9, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 44.9, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
SAN ANTONIO is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.2, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 68-46 UNDER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 98-61 UNDER (+30.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.7, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 67-43 UNDER (+19.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 102-68 UNDER (+27.2 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 165-130 UNDER (+22.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.0, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
SAN ANTONIO is 66-93 against the 1rst half line (-36.3 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.9, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 49-77 against the 1rst half line (-35.7 Units) as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 78-115 against the 1rst half line (-48.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.2, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) in home games after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 42-64 against the 1rst half line (-28.4 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.2, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 39-61 against the 1rst half line (-28.1 Units) in home games after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
TULSA is 8-19 against the 1rst half line (-12.9 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 38.0, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 22-42 against the 1rst half line (-24.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 35.8, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 17-31 against the 1rst half line (-17.1 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 36.7, OPPONENT 43.2 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 38.9, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 15-32 against the 1rst half line (-20.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 37.6, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 7-19 against the 1rst half line (-13.9 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 37.9, OPPONENT 44.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
TULSA is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 43.1, OPPONENT 44.7 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after scoring 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 39.7, OPPONENT 46.6 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 21-11 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 38.7, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 38.7, OPPONENT 45.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a division game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 41.8, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 17-7 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 39.5, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games off a road loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 44.8, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 39.3, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
TULSA is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 35.6, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 212-156 UNDER (+40.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.9, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 40-22 UNDER (+15.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 29-17 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 63-41 UNDER (+17.9 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.3, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 43-26 UNDER (+14.4 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.2, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 43-25 UNDER (+15.5 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.1, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 110-78 UNDER (+24.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 74-48 UNDER (+21.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.4, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 67-37 UNDER (+26.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.7, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 34-18 UNDER (+14.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a blowout loss by 15 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.9, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 19-8 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a blowout loss by 20 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 31.6, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 110-80 UNDER (+22.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.7, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 116-86 UNDER (+21.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.1, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 7-14 | -0.5 | 12-9 | 12-9 | 77.8 | 37.6 | 40.3% | 41.3 | 80.6 | 39.5 | 45.7% | 44.2 | Road Games | 2-8 | -0.7 | 5-5 | 6-4 | 72.8 | 36.1 | 37.9% | 39.5 | 80.1 | 39.3 | 47.0% | 44.2 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +5.7 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 79.2 | 38.4 | 46.0% | 44.4 | 68.0 | 31.6 | 37.8% | 40.0 | Division Games | 4-6 | +4.1 | 8-2 | 7-3 | 81.9 | 38.5 | 44.2% | 38.8 | 81.1 | 39.1 | 47.1% | 40.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.8 | 37.6 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 7-20 | 33.6% | 17-21 | 78.6% | 41 | 11 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 74.7 | 37.3 | 28-67 | 41.5% | 5-14 | 31.6% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 42 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.8 | 36.1 | 25-66 | 37.9% | 6-20 | 30.2% | 17-21 | 81.2% | 39 | 9 | 15 | 17 | 9 | 15 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.6 | 39.5 | 30-66 | 45.7% | 5-15 | 33.4% | 15-20 | 76.2% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 19 | 9 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 76.9 | 38.5 | 29-67 | 43.0% | 4-14 | 31.9% | 15-19 | 78.3% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.1 | 39.3 | 30-65 | 47.0% | 5-14 | 32.2% | 14-19 | 76.3% | 44 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 9 | 16 | 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 6-13 | 0 | 8-11 | 6-13 | 71.6 | 35.3 | 39.3% | 40.7 | 79.9 | 38.7 | 46.2% | 44.9 | Home Games | 4-5 | +0.4 | 4-5 | 2-7 | 73.3 | 36.3 | 40.8% | 42.0 | 75.0 | 38.4 | 42.1% | 44.3 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-5 | 64.6 | 33.2 | 36.9% | 45.0 | 72.6 | 36.6 | 42.3% | 45.6 | Division Games | 2-7 | +1 | 2-7 | 2-7 | 72.7 | 34.8 | 40.2% | 38.8 | 85.3 | 39.8 | 50.1% | 41.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.6 | 35.3 | 28-70 | 39.3% | 5-17 | 31.9% | 11-15 | 72.3% | 41 | 10 | 17 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.9 | 37.9 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 5-15 | 31.7% | 15-19 | 77.6% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 73.3 | 36.3 | 28-68 | 40.8% | 5-16 | 31.7% | 13-18 | 73.4% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.9 | 38.7 | 31-66 | 46.2% | 4-13 | 31.9% | 15-18 | 82.1% | 45 | 10 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 77.9 | 38.8 | 29-67 | 43.4% | 4-13 | 31.9% | 15-20 | 78.4% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.0 | 38.4 | 28-66 | 42.1% | 4-15 | 26.5% | 15-19 | 82.7% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: TULSA 72, SAN ANTONIO 70.6 |
| | |
|
|
6/28/2013 | @ INDIANA | 69-80 | 33-39 | 1.5 | L | 70 | O | 25-65 | 38.5% | 40 | 17 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 40 | 13 | 6/30/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 61-84 | 34-44 | 2 | L | 79 | U | 17-70 | 24.3% | 40 | 15 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 62 | 18 | 7/2/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 69-88 | 34-43 | 3 | L | 74 | O | 26-77 | 33.8% | 44 | 9 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 49 | 13 | 7/11/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 78-94 | 35-50 | 4.5 | L | 80.5 | O | 29-68 | 42.6% | 40 | 20 | 39-71 | 54.9% | 35 | 10 | 7/13/2013 | MINNESOTA | 75-86 | 37-51 | 5.5 | L | 78.5 | O | 26-67 | 38.8% | 36 | 15 | 34-61 | 55.7% | 43 | 15 | 7/17/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 86-59 | 45-26 | 3 | W | 71 | P | 31-54 | 57.4% | 36 | 17 | 20-57 | 35.1% | 32 | 19 | 7/19/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 64-58 | 27-28 | 1 | T | 78.5 | U | 25-75 | 33.3% | 66 | 24 | 21-72 | 29.2% | 46 | 15 | 7/21/2013 | ATLANTA | 90-63 | 44-35 | 2.5 | W | 78.5 | O | 33-63 | 52.4% | 44 | 8 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 47 | 8 | 7/25/2013 | INDIANA | 60-71 | 34-38 | -2 | L | 72 | P | 20-55 | 36.4% | 34 | 19 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 38 | 18 | 8/2/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 96-89 | 42-31 | 4.5 | W | 80 | U | 33-62 | 53.2% | 42 | 14 | 36-78 | 46.2% | 37 | 11 | 8/4/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2013 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2013 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/20/2013 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/25/2013 | PHOENIX | 77-83 | 33-43 | 3 | L | 83.5 | U | 30-83 | 36.1% | 41 | 7 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 56 | 12 | 6/30/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 67-93 | 40-49 | 7 | L | 75.5 | O | 25-65 | 38.5% | 32 | 21 | 36-64 | 56.2% | 45 | 18 | 7/6/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 66-93 | 29-39 | 7 | L | 79 | U | 25-69 | 36.2% | 38 | 15 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 43 | 12 | 7/10/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 88-80 | 41-40 | 5.5 | W | 82.5 | U | 35-66 | 53.0% | 35 | 12 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 35 | 17 | 7/12/2013 | WASHINGTON | 73-83 | 36-49 | -2 | L | 76 | O | 28-71 | 39.4% | 33 | 7 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 51 | 16 | 7/14/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 84-86 | 32-34 | 4 | W | 76.5 | U | 31-74 | 41.9% | 46 | 14 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 38 | 7 | 7/16/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 64-86 | 36-41 | 3.5 | L | 75 | O | 28-72 | 38.9% | 42 | 16 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 48 | 10 | 7/19/2013 | MINNESOTA | 71-87 | 31-46 | 6 | L | 79 | U | 25-66 | 37.9% | 44 | 16 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 40 | 12 | 7/20/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 60-52 | 35-35 | -0.5 | L | 77 | U | 27-64 | 42.2% | 48 | 16 | 21-72 | 29.2% | 46 | 11 | 7/25/2013 | NEW YORK | 65-53 | 31-22 | -1.5 | W | 72.5 | U | 19-61 | 31.1% | 52 | 13 | 16-60 | 26.7% | 48 | 16 | 8/2/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 63-85 | 33-39 | 8 | W | 78 | U | 25-73 | 34.2% | 39 | 13 | 38-71 | 53.5% | 46 | 11 | 8/4/2013 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2013 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2013 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2013 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/17/2013 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
TULSA is 21-19 versus the first half line when playing against SAN ANTONIO since 1997 | 20 of 40 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
TULSA is 5-4 versus the first half line when playing against SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons | 5 of 9 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
TULSA is 12-9 versus the first half line when playing against SAN ANTONIO since 1997 | 13 of 21 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
SAN ANTONIO is 2-2 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA over the last 3 seasons | 2 of 4 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/16/2012 | TULSA | 80 | 162.5 | SU ATS | 48 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 12-19 | 63.2% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 41 | 7 | 18 | | SAN ANTONIO | 70 | -13.5 | Under | 44 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 4-22 | 18.2% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 37 | 9 | 15 | 9/12/2012 | SAN ANTONIO | 78 | -9.5 | SU ATS | 51 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 42 | 8 | 14 | | TULSA | 67 | 162 | Under | 27 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 13-14 | 92.9% | 38 | 9 | 13 | 8/25/2012 | TULSA | 71 | 158.5 | Over | 38 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 8-24 | 33.3% | 3-4 | 75.0% | 29 | 6 | 14 | | SAN ANTONIO | 91 | -16 | SU ATS | 50 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 10-24 | 41.7% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 48 | 16 | 9 | 8/17/2012 | SAN ANTONIO | 89 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 46 | 34-65 | 52.3% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 42 | 8 | 16 | | TULSA | 79 | 163.5 | Over | 46 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 20-28 | 71.4% | 34 | 6 | 15 | 5/19/2012 | SAN ANTONIO | 88 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 31-56 | 55.4% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 20-29 | 69.0% | 47 | 12 | 24 | | TULSA | 79 | 150.5 | Over | 42 | 32-77 | 41.6% | 9-18 | 50.0% | 6-10 | 60.0% | 36 | 12 | 18 |
|
| | |
|
Dan is 55-73 against the 1rst half line (-25.3 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.4, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 38-58 against the 1rst half line (-25.8 Units) as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 60-77 against the 1rst half line (-24.7 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 52-67 against the 1rst half line (-21.7 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.3, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 34-47 against the 1rst half line (-17.7 Units) in home games after a division game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.9, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 62-76 against the 1rst half line (-21.6 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.6, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 30-47 against the 1rst half line (-21.7 Units) in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.5, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 14-29 against the 1rst half line (-17.9 Units) in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.0, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 32-50 against the 1rst half line (-23.0 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.0, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 21-33 against the 1rst half line (-15.3 Units) in home games after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 58-71 against the 1rst half line (-20.1 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.2, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 17-33 against the 1rst half line (-19.3 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.8, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 40-54 against the 1rst half line (-19.4 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.7, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 48-61 against the 1rst half line (-19.1 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 34-47 against the 1rst half line (-17.7 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.2, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 17-29 against the 1rst half line (-14.9 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.9, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Gary is 8-19 against the 1rst half line (-12.9 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 38.0, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Gary is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 36.8, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 26-16 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 49-36 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 76-61 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.6, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 18-9 against the 1rst half line (+8.1 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.2, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 44-27 against the 1rst half line (+14.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 39.5, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Gary is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 43.1, OPPONENT 44.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Gary is 21-11 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 38.7, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Gary is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 38.7, OPPONENT 45.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Gary is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 41.7, OPPONENT 45.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Gary is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 42.6, OPPONENT 46.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Gary is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 41.9, OPPONENT 46.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Gary is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 39.2, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Gary is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 40.0, OPPONENT 45.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Dan is 151-116 UNDER (+23.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.0, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 71-57 UNDER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.4, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 37-26 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 123-91 UNDER (+22.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Dan 35.5, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 161-117 UNDER (+32.3 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Dan 35.3, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 158-113 UNDER (+33.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Dan 34.5, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 42-30 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 49-19 UNDER (+28.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Dan 34.1, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Dan is 72-57 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 44-25 UNDER (+16.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Dan 32.8, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 48-36 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 39-23 UNDER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.3, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 28-17 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.9, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 47-30 UNDER (+14.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.3, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 29-16 UNDER (+11.4 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss by 10 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.4, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 77-62 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 53-39 UNDER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.7, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 42-25 UNDER (+14.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.7, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 21-11 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a blowout loss by 15 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.8, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 74-60 UNDER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 56-41 UNDER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.9, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 74-55 UNDER (+13.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.2, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 75-60 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 78-58 UNDER (+14.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.6, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 58-41 UNDER (+12.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 22-11 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.6, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 142-97 UNDER (+35.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Dan 34.3, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 50-36 UNDER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.7, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 64-43 UNDER (+16.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Dan 35.9, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 67-46 UNDER (+16.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.9, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 70-53 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 139-95 UNDER (+34.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Dan 34.5, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 116-97 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 36-23 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.5, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 39-23 UNDER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Dan 34.3, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 28 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 21 times. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 3 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 2 times. |
|
|
| |
|
Since 1997, 17 games went over the first half total, while 16 games went under the first half total. | Over the last 3 seasons, 3 games went over the first half total, while 3 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 6 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 4 times. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 1 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 0 times. | Since 1997, 5 games went over the first half total, while 5 games went under the first half total. | Over the last 3 seasons, 1 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[F] 08/02/2013 - Delisha Milton-Jones "?" Sunday vs. Tulsa Shock ( Knee ) | [G] 07/08/2013 - Becky Hammon out for season ( Knee ) | [F] 05/23/2013 - Sophia Young out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/15/2024 4:04:15 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|